Am_0002.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Amendment No. 0002 W9128F

Consolidated Helo/TRF/OPS AMU & Alert Facility PNQJVF153001 (FY19) Minot AFB, ND

See attached documentation for content of the amendment revisions to solicitation

Date for receipt of proposals is 16 JUNE 2022 at 1400 hours

Government Point of Contact: MAJ Shawn Adkins,Contract Specialist Shawn.A.Adkins@usace.army.mil

U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT

CONTRACTING OFFICE

1616 CAPITOL AVE.

OMAHA, NE 68102-4901

See Item 6

W9128F-22-R-0048

06/02/2022

04/15/2022

Am #0002 - 2 (Continuation SF 30)

01 JUN 2022

Solicitation No. W9128F22R0048

Date of Issue: 15 APR 2022 Date of Receiving Proposals: 16 JUN 2022

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0002 to Request for Proposal Solicitation Package for Construction of Consolidated Helo/TRF/OPS AMU & Alert Facility

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications. (Descriptive Changes.)

(1) Section 21 13 13.00 10 Paragraph 1.4, Delete “21 13 23 HIGH

EXPANSION FOAM (HEF) FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS.”

(2) Section 21 13 17.00 10 Paragraph 1.4, Delete “21 13 23 HIGH

EXPANSION FOAM (HEF) FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS.”

(3) Section 21 13 18.00 10 Paragraph 1.2, Subpart b. – add the following sentence: “Provide as many pre-action zones as required in the hangar bays to meet NFPA requirements on water delivery times and system volume requirements.”

(4) Section 21 13 18.00 10 Paragraph 1.2, Remove “.2 gpm/square foot” and replace with “.3 gpm/square foot”. Remove “5,000 square feet” and replace with “4,600 square feet”.

(5) Section 21 13 18.00 10 Paragraph 1.4, Delete “21 13 23 HIGH

(6) Section 21 30 00. Paragraph 1.2.1, Remove “to 185 psi” and replace with “10 psi below system pressure and”. Remove “or HEF system.”

(7) Section 21 30 00. Paragraph 1.2.2, Remove “to 190 psi” and replace with “5 psi below system pressure.” Remove “210 psi” and replace with “5 psi above system pressure.”

(8) Section 21 30 00. Paragraph 1.4, Delete “21 13 23 HIGH

(9) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 1.1, Removed “Section 21 13 23

HIGH EXPANSION FOAM (HEF) FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS”

(10) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 1.3, Revised the long-form reference for “UFC 4-211-01”: “(2017; with change 3, 2021) Aircraft Maintenance Hangars”

(11) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 1.7, Removed “21 13 23

HIGH EXPANSION FOAM (HEF) FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS”

Am #0002 - 3

(12) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 1.7, SUBMITTALS: SD-02 Shop Drawings - Removed “Emergency Foam/Water System Shutdown Signs;

G, RO”

(13) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 1.7, SUBMITTALS: SD-03 Product Data - Removed “Manual Foam Start Stations; G, DO”, “Manual Foam Stop Stations; G, DO”, “Foam Discharge Visual Notification Appliances; G, DO”, and “Rotating Beacon Contactor; G, DO”

(14) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.1.2, Removed “Foam Beacon Lighting Contactor”

(15) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.3.1, Item c, removed “and foam release beacons”

(16) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.3.3, Section removed in its entirety. Title replaced with “< text deleted >” to avoid renumbering of subsequent subparts.

(17) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.3.4, Removed “Actuation of the foam/water riser shall not activate the preaction system.”

(18) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.4.1, Removed “and high expansion foam”, “The high expansion foam riser tamper switches shall produce a distinct "FOAM SYSTEM DISABLED" supervisory signal.”, and “The high expansion foam riser(s) water flow/pressure switches shall be monitored by the FACP.”

(19) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.5.3, Item f, revised “cubicle” to “ceiling”

(20) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.7, Removed “Install releasing modules and monitor modules integral to the release of the foam system in a conditioned space within the building.”

(21) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.8, Removed “Install releasing

(22) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.9, Removed “Install releasing

(23) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.16.5.2, Item b(2), removed “FOAM/”. Item I, changed “four” to “for”.

(24) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.17, First paragraph removed “foam/water and”. Last paragraph/last sentence, removed “foam agent”

(25) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.22, Removed “Manual fire alarm stations and manual foam start stations shall be separated by a minimum of 5 feet and shall be located on opposite sides of the doors except where indicated on the FA drawings.”

(26) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.22.2, Section removed in its

Am #0002 - 4

(27) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.22.3, Section removed in its

(28) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.23, Removed “Foam beacons and”

(29) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.23.5, Section removed in its

(30) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.32, Removed “Any two optical flame detectors in alarm simultaneously shall result in a foam suppression release.” and “With the exception of a manual foam release station, the cross-zoning of two optical flame detectors in the hangar bay shall be required to release the foam suppression system.”

(31) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 2.33, First paragraph removed two instances of “foam/water”. Second paragraph revised first sentence to read as follows: “Locate the disconnect switch in Fire Suppression Equipment Rooms in readily accessible locations near the solenoid/control valve.”. Second paragraph, removed ““DISABLE FOAM SYSTEM” or”

(32) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 3.6, Removed “Foam: Blue”

(33) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 3.7, Section removed in its

(34) Section 28 31 76. Paragraph 3.84, First paragraph removed “AND FOAM/WATER”. First paragraph removed “FLOW OF FOAM IS NOT

REQUIRED AND VALVES MAY BE CLOSED AHEAD OF THE SOLENOID TO BLOCK

THE FLOW OF FOAM. WATER SHALL FLOW THROUGH THE FOAM TEST

HEADER.”. Second paragraph, removed “21 13 23 HIGH EXPANSION FOAM

(HEF) FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,”

b. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages or sections as noted below. The substituted pages or sections are revised and reissued with this amendment. For convenience, on the revised specification pages, changes have been identified by “[*Am- 2]”(underlining of added text and/or strikeout of deleted text).

Pages or Sections Deleted Pages or Sections Substituted or Added 00 22 00 00 22 00*

REGISTER REGISTER*

ND20220031 ND20220031*

ND20220043 ND20220043*

ND20220054 ND20220054*

21 13 23 ** ** **

c. Drawings (Reissued). The following drawings are revised with latest revision date indicated on each sheet and reissued with this amendment.

Am #0002 - 5

(1) Sheet FA001, FIRE ALARM GENERAL NOTES AND SUPPLEMENTAL LEGEND

(2) Sheet FA002, FIRE ALARM KEYED NOTES

(3) Sheet FA111, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA A (BASIC)

(4) Sheet FA112, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA B

(5) Sheet FA113, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA C

(6) Sheet FA114, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA D

(7) Sheet FA115, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA E

(8) Sheet FA116, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA F

(9) Sheet FA117, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA G

(10) Sheet FA118, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA H

(11) Sheet FA119A, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST

FLOOR – HANGAR BID OPTION “WEST”

(12) Sheet FA119B, FIRE ALARM INITIATION AND CONTROL PLAN FIRST

FLOOR – HANGAR BID OPTION “EAST”

(13) Sheet FA211, FIRE ALARM VISUAL NOTIFICATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA A (BASIC)

(14) Sheet FA212, FIRE PLAN VISUAL NOTIFICATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR –

AREA B

(15) Sheet FA213, FIRE ALARM VISUAL NOTIFICATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA C

(16) Sheet FA214, FIRE ALARM VISUAL NOTIFICATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA D

(17) Sheet FA216, FIRE ALARM VISUAL NOTIFICATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA F

(18) Sheet FA217, FIRE ALARM VISUAL NOTIFICATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA G

(19) Sheet FA218, FIRE ALARM VISUAL NOTIFICATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– AREA H

Am #0002 - 6

(20) Sheet FA219A, FIRE ALARM VISUAL NOTIFICATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR

– HANGAR BID OPTION “WEST”

(21) Sheet FA219B, FIRE ALARM NOTIFICATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR – HANGAR

BID OPTION “EAST”

(22) Sheet FA310, FIRE ALARM AUDIBLE NOTIFICATION LEGEND

(23) Sheet FA400, ENLARGED FIRE ALARM PLANS

(24) Sheet FA501, FIRE ALARM AND FOAM SYSTEM DETAILS

(25) Sheet FA601, FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL (FACP) MATRIX PART 1

(26) Sheet FA602, FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL (FACP) MATRIX PART 2

(27) Sheet FA603, FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL (FACP) MATRIX PART 3

(28) Sheet FA604, FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL (FACP) MATRIX PART 4

(29) Sheet FA605, RELEASING SERVICE CONTROL PANEL (RSCP) MATRIX –

RSCP040

(30) Sheet FA606, RELEASING SERVICE CONTROL PANEL (RSCP) MATRIX –

RSCP070

(31) Sheet FA610, RISER DIAGRAM NOTES FIRE ALARM AND ASSOCIATED

SYSTEMS

(32) Sheet FA611, RISER DIAGRAM FIRE ALARM, MASS NOTIFICATION, AND

(PARTIAL) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS

(33) Sheet FA612, RISER DIAGRAM RELEASING, CONTAINMENT, AND CLEAN

AGENT SYSTEMS

(34) Sheet FA620, VISUAL NOTIFICATION ZONES DISTRIBUTION MATRIX

(35) Sheet FA621, VISUAL NOTIFICATION TRANSMISSION PRIORITY

MATRICES

(36) Sheet FX110, COMPOSITE FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN

(37) Sheet FX111, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “A”

(38) Sheet FX112, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “B”

(39) Sheet FX113, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “C”

(40) Sheet FX114, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “D”

(41) Sheet FX115, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “E”

(42) Sheet FX116, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “F”

(43) Sheet FX117, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “G”

(44) Sheet FX118, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “H”

Am #0002 - 7

(45) Sheet FX119A, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN HANGAR BITD

OPTION “WEST”

(46) Sheet FX119B, FIRST FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN HANGAR BID

OPTION “EAST”

(47) Sheet FX120, COMPOSITE SECOND FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN

(48) Sheet FX125, SECOND FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “E”

(49) Sheet FX126, SECOND FLOOR FIRE PROTECTION PLAN – AREA “F”

(50) Sheet FX301, FIRE PROTECTION SECTIONS

(51) Sheet FX302, FIRE PROTECTION SECTIONS

(52) Sheet FX601, FIRE SUPPRESSION SCHEDULES

(53) Sheet EL501, LIGHTING DETAILS AND LINE-VOLTAGE LIGHTING

CONTROLS

(54) Sheet EP112, POWER PLAN – FIRST FLOOR AREA B: RECEPTACLES

(55) Sheet EP116, POWER PLAN – FIRST FLOOR AREA F: RECEPTACLES

(56) Sheet EP216, POWER PLAN – FIRST FLOOR AREA F: EQUIPMENT

(57) Sheet EP400, ENLARGED POWER PLANS

(58) Sheet EP401, ENLARGED POWER PLANS

(59) Sheet EP601, ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM NORMAL POWER

(60) Sheet EP602, ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM GENERATION POWER

(61) Sheet EP611, EQUIPMENT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION SCHEDULE CF/CI:

PART 1

(62) Sheet EP613, EQUIPMENT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION SCHEDULE CF/CI:

PART 3

(63) Sheet EP614, EQUIPMENT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION SCHEDULE CF/CI:

PART 4

(64) Sheet EP621, PANEL SCHEDULES

(65) Sheet EP644, PANEL SCHEDULES

(66) Sheet EP650, PANEL SCHEDULES

(67) Sheet EP654, PANEL SCHEDULES

2. This amendment is a part of the proposing papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged. All other conditions and requirements of the request for proposal remain unchanged.

Am #0002 - 8

3. Electronic Proposal/Email. See section 00 22 00 for how to submit electronic proposals.

4. Electric Offers will be received until 2:00 p.m., local time at place of receiving proposals, 16 JUN 2022, as stated in the Request For Proposal.

Attachments:

Spec Pages listed in 1.a. and 1.b. above Dwgs. listed in 1.c. above

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

1 JUN 2022

jmh/2181

Section 00 22 00 W9128F-22-R-0048

Section 00 22 00 Page 1

SECTION 00 22 00 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA

AND BASIS OF AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

4.1. VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL

4.2. VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO-FORMA INFORMATION

5.0 VOLUME 1 –FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL

5.1. FACTOR 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE AND EXPERIENCE

5.2. FACTOR 2 – SCHEDULE AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.3. FACTOR 3 – KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

5.4. FACTOR 4 – UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS

6.0 VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

6.1. GENERAL

6.2. FACTOR 5 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND

CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE)

6.3. EVIDENCE OF BONDABILITY

6.4. REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

6.5. SUB CONTRACTING PLAN

7.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

7.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

7.2. EVALUATION

7.3. DEFINITIONS

7.4. EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

7.5. PAST PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

Section 00 22 00 Page 2

ATTACHMENTS

1 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME

CONTRACTOR

2 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE KEY SUBCONTRACTOR (OR PRIME IF

WORK NOT TO BE SUBCONTRACTED)

3 – NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

4 - KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

5 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

6 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR (DESIGN FIRM OR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR)

7 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

Section 00 22 00 Page 3

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1. This is a “Best Value - Tradeoff” solicitation for the Construction of Helo AMU/MX/Alert Shelter/Ops Facility at Minot AFB, ND. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm-fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

1.2. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

Proposals shall be submitted by the time and date as specified. All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format with Optical Character Recognition (OCR) applied to all documents that will enable word searches to be conducted using Adobe-compatible PDF software. The two (2) volumes listed below shall be submitted as “SEPARATE” single files. Due to heightened security at Government installations, the proposal shall be emailed to the following. If the proposal is too large for email, Offers may be submitted electronically via DOD Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE) at https://safe.apps.mil/ to the following recipients:

1. MAJ Shawn Adkins, shawn.a.adkins@usace.army.mil

2. Glenda Canty, Glenda.A.Canty@usace.army.mil

**Offerors accessing the DOD SAFE site as a GUEST (a “Guest” is defined as a user who is not assigned a CAC) must request a package invitation from the Contract Specialist listed in Section 00 22 00 a minimum of 48-business hours prior to the close of the RFP.**

For the purposes of determining whether the proposal was received "late" in accordance with FAR 15.208, the date and time the file(s) are received by the USACE Outlook Server or uploaded into the DOD SAFE website as identified in the DOD SAFE notification e-mail sent to the Contract Specialist(s)/ Contracting Officer will be the time and date the Government received the proposal. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal.

Coordinate directly with the Contract Specialist for any questions related to submission requirements or format.

Volume I: Technical Volume II: Price and Pro Forma Information

Title the single files in the following format:

W9128F22R0048_CompanyName_Volume_I_Technical W9128F220R0048_CompanyName_Volume_II_Price_and_Pro_Forma_Information (Note: Company name may be abbreviated)

It is imperative that none of the pricing or Volume 2 information show up in Volume 1.

1.3. PROPOSAL FORMAT

The Packaging that contains the Proposals shall be sealed and marked:

Section 00 22 00 Page 4

“Proposals for Solicitation No. W9128F-22-R-0048, to be opened by Contracting Personnel Only”

Submit each volume as a separate .PDF file. The pages shall be formatted as 8 ½” x 11” using 10 point or larger font size. For each file, provide a title sheet and a table of contents hyperlinked or bookmarked to the appropriate location in the document. The Table of Contents must include, at a minimum, separate entries for each evaluation factor. Provide a title sheet within each volume identifying the prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, telephone, fax and email address and point of contact. Include the signature, title and contact information of the official that can bind the firm. For this solicitation, a page is considered a single sided page or sheet. Double sided pages will be considered two pages when determining page limits. Blank pages used to separate sections will not be counted when determining page limits.

Volume number and tab section submitted shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number and revision date for the amended page, if necessary)

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

2.1. The Contracting Officer will award a firm-fixed-price contract to that responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority has determined conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are approximately equal to the cost/price factor. After the Government individually evaluates and rates each proposal, the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Authority will determine which proposal represents the best value. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Official must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the cost limitation) would justify award to that offeror.

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.1. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.2. The proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the requirements of the RFP. The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail and should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

3.3. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror’s evaluation.

3.4. Firms formally organized as construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations

Section 00 22 00 Page 5 may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. See Attachment 8 for Contractor Team Arrangements.

3.5. Submit proposals per paragraph 1.2 above. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

4.1. VOLUME 1 –TECHNICAL

Factors 1-4 are listed in descending order of importance, with Factor 1 being the most important.

Factor Description Notes

Factor 1 Past Performance and Experience

Factor 2 Schedule and Project Management Plan

Factor 3 Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience

Factor 4 Utilization of Small Business Concerns

4.2. VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Factor Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 5

Price (Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet And Contract Line Item Schedule)

All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are approximately equal to cost or price (Factor 5).

N/A Evidence of Bondability Not Rated

N/A Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

N/A Sub-Contracting Plan Not Rated (Do not provide with proposal)

NOTE: 8(a) Joint Venture Offeror or Offeror submitting Proposal as HubZone Joint Venture shall submit evidence from Offerors SBA Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or business Opportunity Specialist.

5.0 VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL

Section 00 22 00 Page 6

5.1. VOLUME 1– FACTOR 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE AND EXPERIENCE

5.1.1. Submission Requirements:

5.1.1.1. Construction Projects. The Offeror shall submit three (3) projects performed by the Prime Construction Entity. Limit one (1) page per project submitted, with one additional page allowed for describing past teaming experience between current team members (see below).

Any information presented beyond the page limit will not be evaluated.

At least one project shall demonstrate experience constructing a hangar facility, or similar (motorpool, large bay facility, etc.) of at least 15,000 square feet.

5.1.1.2. Teaming Experience. In one page, the Offeror shall demonstrate any previous teaming experience between current team members. Teaming experience information is limited to projects that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past eight years preceding the issue date of this solicitation.

5.1.1.3. Project Information. All projects submitted should demonstrate experience on similar (relevant) projects of equal or greater value. Submit projects that are “well underway” (at least 75% construction complete), or were completed and turned over no longer than eight ten

(810) years preceding the issue date of this solicitation. The proposed prime construction entity shall have performed in the same role as the prime or lead entities on the projects submitted. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements set forth in the RFP. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. If the Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. If projects were design-build, so identify them.

Project information should CLEARLY include:

(a) Type of Facility Represented

(b) Name of Firm

(c) Name of Project

(d) Location of Project

(e) Owner, including reference POC with confirmed contact information

(f) General Scope of Construction Project

(g) Summary of Your Role in the Project

(h) Construction Cost at completion

(i) Extent and Type of Work Subcontracted Out

(j) Dates Construction Began and Completed

Section 00 22 00 Page 7

5.1.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.1.2.1. Projects that included an Aircraft Hangar facilities greater than 25,000 square feet in size may be rated more favorably.

5.1.2.2. Projects that demonstrate experience with UFGS 32 13 14.13 compliant airfield paving may be rated more favorably.

5.1.2.3. Projects that demonstrate experience with UFGS 32 12 15.13 compliant airfield paving may be rated more favorably.

5.1.2.4. Projects that were not completed within the United States may be rated less favorably. Not used.

5.1.2.5. Experience on similar projects that exceed the scope and value may be rated more favorably.

5.1.2.6. Experience on USACE projects may be rated more favorably than Federal Government project experience.

5.1.2.7. The Government will consider extent of demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Previous experience in North Dakota may be rated more favorably.

5.1.2.8. Note: The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing DoD or Government appraisal systems, or through interviewing owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.1.2.9. Note: A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project while employed at a different firm.

5.1.3. Past Performance Submission Requirements:

Submit past performance evaluations and ratings for each project the Offeror includes this factor. The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract’s requirements. One performance confidence assessment rating is assigned for each offeror after evaluating the offeror's recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the contract requirements.

If available, submit Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Performance Evaluations ratings. For projects which were constructed for other government entities, submit the performance appraisal sheets used by that government entity if available.

5.1.3.1. CPARS Evaluations

Firms are requested to retrieve their CPARS past performance information directly from CPARS available at: http://www.cpars.gov. CPARS is an electronic repository of performance information collected by all the major federal performance reporting systems.

Logging onto CPARS will require the following:

Section 00 22 00 Page 8

All Department of Defense (DoD) employees (military and civilian), including DoD Contractors that are working on site (military/government facilities) or contractors working offsite using Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) are required to use certificates from DoD Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) to access CPARS. If the contractor doesn't work on site or with GFE they are encouraged to obtain and use a certificate from an External Certificate Authority (ECA). For DoD users, the use of PKI Login is Mandatory. Federal and Contractor users can use the PKI login category if they have PKI.

External Certificate Authority External Certificate Authorities (ECAs) and Interim External Certificate Authorities (IECAs) provide digital certificates to the DoD's private industry partners, contractors using their own equipment or working in non-government facilities, allied partners, and other agencies.

Additional information about the PKI certificate is at https://www.cpars.gov/pki_info.htm web page.

You will also need your DUNS number and Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) to log onto CPARS. The MPIN number was selected by whoever registered your firm in the System for Award Management (SAM) Registry at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. If you do not know your MPIN number, you will need to contact the SAM help desk by emailing them from the email link on the https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ web page. Please be aware that they will only release the MPIN number to the person who originally registered your firm.

There are two other ways to obtain a copy of CPARS evaluations as follows: (1) Contact your government point of contact for the project you mentioned, and ask them if they can send you a copy, or (2) Apply for “Contractor/Senior Contractor Representative” access at http://www.cpars.gov. This type of access is issued to only one person within the firm, typically a member of senior management. In addition to access to your completed CPARS performance evaluations, you will also be able to view status of evaluations which have not yet been completed. Following receipt of your application request, you will be emailed a logon and access instructions.

5.1.3.2. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

The Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 6) is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client. The Past Performance Questionnaire should be completed by an owner or owner’s representative not affiliated with your firm. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal only for projects which do not have a CPARS evaluation. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 6), which will provide contract and client Information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Section 00 22 00 Page 9

5.1.3.3. Government Utilization of Alternate Information Sources for Past Performance

The Government will assess the past performance on projects submitted under the Specialized Experience factor and reserves the right to conduct telephone interviews with points of contact identified in the proposal or to review personal knowledge. In addition, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance of the Offeror on the submitted projects and any other previous work. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror's proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

5.1.4. Evaluation Criteria:

5.1.4.1. The Government will perform a performance confidence assessment of the offeror’s probability of successfully meeting the contract requirements, considering the degree of success of the offeror’s recent (“well underway” or turned over no longer than 8 years preceding the date of this solicitation), relevant experience. The rating system used for the performance confidence assessment is described in paragraph 7.4.

5.1.4.2. Relevancy: The Government will first assess the relevancy of recent projects accomplished by the offeror to the scope of this contract for overall application to the performance confidence assessment ratings described hereinafter. The projects will include those submitted under the Past Performance and Experience Factor as well as from other sources described above. This assessment is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing an overall past performance confidence assessment assigned to the Past Performance and Experience Factor. The past performance relevancy assessments are described below:

(a) Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(b) Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(c) Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(d) Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

5.1.4.3. Performance: The Government will next consider how well the offeror performed on the contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance.

Section 00 22 00 Page 10

CPARs and/or PPQs with little to no supporting narrative will be weighted less significantly (both positive and negative) than CPARs and/or PPQs with more convincing supportive narratives. Past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance. Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and designer or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting design or construction errors, warranty work, etc. (see the interview form at attachment 6). The Government will target areas covered in the requirements of this proposal including records of conforming to quality, schedule, cost control, customer satisfaction, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, problem resolution for design or construction errors, warranty work, and safety. The Government will not release the Interview Forms to the offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased interview comments. The Government also places a higher value on projects, which document successful outcomes and are supported by outside source confirmation, for example, but not limited to telephone interviews with points of contact identified in the proposal, other agency performance databases, offeror furnished references, or personal knowledge. The Government also places a higher value on projects, which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the contractor used to resolve problems successfully. This assessment is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing an overall past performance confidence assessment rating assigned to the Past Performance and Experience Factor. The past performance confidence ratings are described below:

(a) Substantial Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

(b) Satisfactory Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

(c) Limited Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

(d) No Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(e) Neutral Confidence: No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

5.1.4.4. Each entity (firm) will be rated on its own performance or that of its predecessor, if relevant.

An entity may not establish past performance based on the past performance of its proposed key personnel, apart from that of the entity. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, The Government will only evaluate past performance of the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. If the Government does not obtain past performance

Section 00 22 00 Page 11 information for the projects identified by the offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the offeror through other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance confidence assessment rating will be considered “Unknown Confidence”.

5.2. VOLUME 1– FACTOR 2 – SCHEDULE AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.2.1. Submission Requirements:

5.2.1.1. Provide information that describes the offeror’s Project Management approach to executing the construction contract per the detailed requirements herein. Clearly and concisely describe the organizational and technical approaches to project management and execution, and contract duration. Limit to eight (8) pages or less.

5.2.1.2. Proposed Contract Duration. The offeror shall propose the contract duration in the appropriate Contract Line Item Number in the CLIN Schedule. The offeror shall also list this duration in this section of the proposal. Use an arbitrary, non-binding Notice to Proceed date of 15 October 2022. This date, in no way, obligates the government to award a contract on any particular date or timeframe.

5.2.1.3. Risk Assessment. Page Limit – Five (5) pages of the eight (8) total pages of the Project Management Plan. Submit a list of risks specifically associated with this project. Identify the degree of risk, possible impact of the risk on the project, whether it is within or outside the Offeror’s control, and a plan to mitigate the risk(s).

5.2.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.2.2.1. Technical Approach for Construction. Proposals that clearly and concisely demonstrate a thorough understanding of the constraints and impacts of working in Minot, ND may be rated more favorably.

5.2.2.2. Proposed Contract Duration: Unless changed during negotiations, this duration will become the contractually binding performance period. The Government may consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places undue risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators’ judgment.

5.2.2.3. Risk Assessment. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it demonstrates the ability to: Identify and mitigate risk(s); establish a degree of risk, that may impact mission, safety, quality, schedule, and cost; and, identify whether risk(s) is/are within the Offeror’s control.

5.3. VOLUME 1– FACTOR 3 - KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

5.3.1. Submission Requirements:

5.3.1.1. For key personnel provide a brief resume using the Key Personnel Resume form at the end of this Section. Indicate the position title on each project listed in resumes. Provide the name, owner, dollar amount, dates worked on the project, date of completion, and brief scope of each resume project. Limit two (2) pages per resume submitted.

Section 00 22 00 Page 12

Include resumes for the following key personnel:

- Project Manager responsible for the overall project (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- Construction Quality Control System Manager (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- General Superintendent (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

5.3.1.2. The minimum experience requirement for the Project Manager is 5 years of experience as a Project Manager, managing similar projects to this solicitation.

5.3.1.3. The minimum experience requirement for the Contractor Quality Control (CQC) System Manager is 5 years of experience as a Quality Control Manager on similar projects to this solicitation. CQC System Manager shall comply with personnel requirements listed in Section 01 45 00.00 10.

5.3.1.4. The minimum experience requirement for the Superintendent is 10 years’ experience as superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors.

5.3.1.5. Offeror shall provide unequivocal letters of commitment from all proposed key personnel NOT currently employed by the Offeror. Use the form letter at the end of this section.

5.3.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.3.2.1. The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary, which includes previous satisfactory experience in similar type work, to manage, control and to perform construction.

5.3.2.2. Resumes that do not clearly state the personnel’s specific duties and job title on previous projects may be rated less favorably.

5.3.2.3. Project Managers that hold active architect or engineer professional registration may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.4. Offerors that propose key personnel who worked on the projects in Factor 1 may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.5. Key personnel that demonstrate experience on at least one project that included a minimum 125,000 square foot Hangar Facility completed in the past 810 years (as required for projects in Factor 1) may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.6. Key personnel that exceed the required minimum years of experience in their position may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.7. Previous Federal government project experience may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.8. Performance of key personnel proposed for this project may be taken into account when it comes to the attention of the Government. This shall be achievable with other projected or on-going work.

Section 00 22 00 Page 13

5.3.2.9. The Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members as a strength. The more relevant the experience, as defined in 7.3.14, the more favorably it may be rated.

5.3.2.10. Note: The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing DoD or Government appraisal systems, or through interviewing owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.4. VOLUME 1– FACTOR 4 – UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS

(REQUIRED FOR ALL OFFERORS)

5.4.1. Submission Requirements:

5.4.1.1. This factor requires all offerors, regardless of size status to address their planned small business usage for this project. All offerors are required to provide a Small Business Participation Plan. It should address their corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting and using small businesses in the performance of this contract. All plans should address the Offeror's commitments to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and /or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small businesses. This Participation Plan should include a breakdown of small business subcategories to be used as shown on the chart in (d) below.

5.4.1.2. The Participation Plan should demonstrate commitment to all federally designated categories of small business: Small Businesses (SBs), Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSBs), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs) HUBZone Small Businesses (HUB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs), and Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSBs).

The plan should identify all categories for participation as part of the Offeror's team. This should include a general description of the type of work, product or service anticipated to be supplied via a small business concern. The Offeror shall not exceed more than 10 pages for the submitted Small Business Participation Plan. A specific format is not required, however, items stated below (a) through (e) shall be provided as a minimum.

Small Business Participation Plan requirements:

(a) Provide a Narrative addressing the corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting and using small businesses in the performance of this contract. The Narrative should address the Offeror's commitment to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and /or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small businesses. The Narrative should provide detailed supporting documentation regarding the individual commitments expressed in percentages for evaluators to determine that the goals stated are realistic.

(b) Provide the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror for this procurement.

______Large Business Prime Offeror ______Small Business Prime Offeror (also check type of SB below) ____Small Disadvantaged Business

____Woman-Owned Small Business

Section 00 22 00 Page 14

____HUB Zone Small Business ____Veteran Owned Small Business ____Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business

(c) Submit the Total Percentages planned for Small Business. Percentages are based on Total

Contract Value of the Offeror. For this project, the awardee is targeted to subcontract 23% of the Total Contract Value to the Small Business Community.

Total Percentage planned for Small Business: = __________% (Small Business Prime Contractors – Include yourselves in the above percentage.)

For example: If you are a Small Business Prime Contractor and will be doing 40% of the work and you will be subcontracting another 23% to other small business firms, then your Total Percentage planned for Small Business will = 63%

(d) Indicate the total percentage of participation, Supplies/Services to be provided and the name of the small business firms intended to be used by each type of subcategory small business.

Type of Small Business % Supplies/Services Name of Small Business Firms

Small Business Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) Woman Owned Small Business (WOSB) Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone)

Service Disabled Veteran-Owned (SDVOSB) Veteran Owned (VOSB)

(e) Provide types of commitments, if any are in place, for this specific acquisition either written, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.

(f) Include a summary with small business participation data for the projects submitted under Factor 1 Specialized Experience. At a minimum, include total small business participation as a percentage of the Total Contract Value, and the CPARS or PPQ rating received for small business participation (as applicable).

5.4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

Small Business Participation Plans will be evaluated on the basis of:

• Percentage of performance of small businesses.

o All offeror’s should propose their best efforts towards the goal of Small Business Participation of 23% of the proposed Total Contract Value (through collective small

Section 00 22 00 Page 15 business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business).

Offerors that exceed the targeted 23% will be rated more favorably than Offerors that meet it. Offerors that do not meet the targeted 23% will be rated lower.

o The subcategory small business goals provided will be reviewed to ensure they are realistic in respect to this project.

• The extents of identification of the work (Supplies/Services) small firms are to perform.

• The extent to which SB firms are specifically identified in proposals.

• The extent of commitment to SB firms.

• Offerors that receive a CPAR rating for Small Business category of exceptional for the projects submitted under Factor 1 Specialized Experience may be rated more favorably.

All…