Am-0004_W9128F-19-R-0004.pdf

PDF 995 KB Posted

Attached to
SOF Human Performance Training Center Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9128F19R0004
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Omaha

About this file

Am-0004_W9128F-19-R-0004

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to SOF Human Performance Training Center, newest first.
File Type Posted
Am-0005_W9128F-19-R-0004.pdf PDF
Am-0003_W9128F-19-R-0004.pdf PDF
Am-0002_W9128F-19-R-0004.pdf PDF
Am-0001_W9128F-19-R-0004.pdf PDF
CAD-BIM-Files_Instructions.txt TXT text file
FCBQ.zip ZIP file
SOF_HPTF_FFE_RTA_for_Binder.pdf PDF
SPECS_W9128F-19-R-0004.pdf PDF
SID_Color_Board_RTA_SOF_HPTF_FCN.pdf PDF
22x34_FCBQ_Advertisement.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Amendment No. 0004 W9128F

SOF HUMAN PERFORMANCE TRAINING CENTER, PN 79447 (FY19), FORT CARSON, COLORADO

See attached documentation for content of the amendment revisions to solicitation

Date for receipt of proposals is 19 FEB 2019 at 1400 hours

Government Point of Contact: Bill Rawe, Contract Specialist (402) 996-3722

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Rocky Mountain Area Office Attn: CONTRACTING DIVISION (CENWO-CT-M) 5475 Tech Center Drive, Suite 205 Colorado Springs, CO 80919

See Item 6

W9128F-19-R-0004

02/08/2019

01/09/2019

02/08/2019

Am #0004 - 1

Am #0004 - 2 (Continuation SF 30)

8 February 2019 Solicitation No. W9128F 19 R 0004

Date of Issue: 09 JAN 2019 Date of Receiving Proposals: 19 FEB 2019

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0004 to Request for Proposal Solicitation Package for Design and Construction of SOF HUMAN PERFORMANCE TRAINING CENTER.

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications. (Descriptive Changes.)

(1) Section 01 30 00.24 Attachments, delete General Wage Rate Decision Number CO190002 in its entirety and substitute General Wage Rate Decision Number CO190002 dated 02/01/2019. General Wage Rate Decision Number CO190002 dated 02/01/2019 is included as an attachment to this Amendment.

(2) Section 01 30 00.24 Attachments, delete General Wage Rate Decision Number CO190022 in its entirety and substitute General Wage Rate Decision Number CO190022 dated 02/01/2019. General Wage Rate Decision Number CO190022 dated 02/01/2019 is included as an attachment to this Amendment.

b. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages or sections as noted below. The substituted pages or sections are revised and reissued with this amendment. For convenience, on the revised specification pages, changes have been identified with highlighting, all portions of the revised specification pages apply regardless of whether changes are shown with highlighting.

Pages or Sections Deleted Pages or Sections Substituted or Added 00 22 00 00 22 00 01 84 00 01 84 00 01 89 00 01 89 00

2. This amendment is a part of the proposing papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged. All other conditions and requirements of the request for proposal remain unchanged.

3. Electronic Proposals. Provide proposals via the instructions provided in Section 00 22 00 of the Request for Proposal.

4. Offers will be received until 2:00 p.m., local time at place of receiving proposals, 19 FEB 2019.

Attachments:

General Wage Rate Decisions CO190002 dated 02/01/2019 CO190022 dated 02/01/2019 Specification Pages listed in 1.b., above

Am #0004 - 3 (Continuation SF 30)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

8 February 2019 nep/2160

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

Am #0004 CO190002 - 1 02/01/2019

General Decision Number: CO190002 02/01/2019 CO2

Superseded General Decision Number: CO20180012

State: Colorado

Construction Type: Heavy

Counties: Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Denver, Douglas, El Paso, Jefferson, Larimer, Mesa, Pueblo and Weld Counties in Colorado.

HEAVY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.60 for calendar year 2019 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.60 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2019. If this contract is covered by the EO and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must pay workers in that classification at least the wage rate determined through the conformance process set forth in 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(ii) (or the EO minimum wage rate,if it is higher than the conformed wage rate). The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Please note that this EO applies to the above-mentioned types of contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but it does not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/04/2019 1 02/01/2019

Am #0004 CO190002 - 2 02/01/2019

ASBE0028-001 07/01/2018

Rates Fringes

Asbestos Workers/Insulator (Includes application of all insulating materials, protective coverings, coatings and finishings to all types of mechanical systems)....................$ 31.73 14.23

* BRCO0007-004 01/01/2019

ADAMS, ARAPAHOE, BOULDER, BROOMFIELD, DENVER, DOUGLAS,

JEFFERSON AND WELD COUNTIES

BRICKLAYER.......................$ 29.52 10.23

BRCO0007-006 05/01/2018

EL PASO AND PUEBLO COUNTIES

Rates Fringes

BRICKLAYER.......................$ 25.88 10.34

ELEC0012-004 09/01/2018

PUEBLO COUNTY

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN

Electrical contract over $1,000,000..................$ 27.70 12.30+3% Electrical contract under $1,000,000..................$ 24.85 12.30+3%

ELEC0068-001 06/01/2018

JEFFERSON, LARIMER, AND WELD COUNTIES

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 35.80 15.45

ELEC0111-001 09/01/2017

Am #0004 CO190002 - 3 02/01/2019

Line Construction:

Groundman...................$ 25.68 25.25%+$5.75 Line Equipment Operator.....$ 31.35 25.25% + $5.75 Lineman and Welder..........$ 44.92 25.25%+$5.75

ELEC0113-002 06/01/2018

EL PASO COUNTY

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 31.80 15.90

* ELEC0969-002 01/01/2019

MESA COUNTY

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 24.80 9.84

ENGI0009-001 05/01/2017

Rates Fringes

Power equipment operators:

Blade: Finish...............$ 27.92 10.10 Blade: Rough................$ 27.60 10.10 Bulldozer...................$ 27.60 10.10 Cranes: 50 tons and under..$ 27.75 10.10 Cranes: 51 to 90 tons......$ 27.92 10.10 Cranes: 91 to 140 tons.....$ 28.55 10.10 Cranes: 141 tons and over...$ 29.82 10.10 Forklift....................$ 27.22 10.10 Mechanic....................$ 28.08 10.10 Oiler.......................$ 26.84 10.10 Scraper: Single bowl under 40 cubic yards........$ 27.75 10.10 Scraper: Single bowl, including pups 40 cubic yards and over and tandem bowls.......................$ 27.92 10.10 Trackhoe....................$ 27.75 10.10

IRON0024-003 06/01/2018

Rates Fringes

Ironworkers:.....................$ 27.45 22.11 Structural

LABO0086-001 05/01/2009

Am #0004 CO190002 - 4 02/01/2019

Laborers:

Pipelayer...................$ 18.68 6.78

PLUM0003-005 06/01/2017

JEFFERSON, LARIMER AND WELD COUNTIES

PLUMBER..........................$ 39.08 16.44

PLUM0058-002 07/01/2018

EL PASO COUNTY

Rates Fringes

Plumbers and Pipefitters.........$ 32.75 14.85

PLUM0058-008 07/01/2018

PUEBLO COUNTY

Rates Fringes

Plumbers and Pipefitters.........$ 32.75 14.85

PLUM0145-002 07/01/2016

MESA COUNTY

Rates Fringes

Plumbers and Pipefitters.........$ 35.17 11.70

PLUM0208-004 06/01/2016

JEFFERSON, LARIMER AND WELD COUNTIES

PIPEFITTER.......................$ 37.10 16.62

SHEE0009-002 07/01/2018

Am #0004 CO190002 - 5 02/01/2019

Sheet metal worker...............$ 34.02 17.49

TEAM0455-002 07/01/2018

Rates Fringes

Truck drivers:

Pickup......................$ 21.41 4.32 Tandem/Semi and Water.......$ 22.04 4.32

SUCO2001-006 12/20/2001

Rates Fringes

BOILERMAKER......................$ 17.60

Carpenters:

Form Building and Setting...$ 16.97 2.74 All Other Work..............$ 15.14 3.37

Cement Mason/Concrete Finisher...$ 17.31 2.85

IRONWORKER, REINFORCING..........$ 18.83 3.90

Laborers:

Common......................$ 11.22 2.92 Flagger.....................$ 8.91 3.80 Landscape...................$ 12.56 3.21

Painters:

Brush, Roller & Spray.......$ 15.81 3.26

Power equipment operators:

Backhoe.....................$ 16.36 2.48 Front End Loader............$ 17.24 3.23 Skid Loader.................$ 15.37 4.41

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other

Am #0004 CO190002 - 6 02/01/2019 health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of "identifiers" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than "SU" or "UAVG" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the "SU" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates

Am #0004 CO190002 - 7 02/01/2019 the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Union Average Rate Identifiers

Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010 08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Am #0004 CO190002 - 8 02/01/2019

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

Am #0004 CO190022 - 1 02/01/2019

General Decision Number: CO190022 02/01/2019 CO22

Superseded General Decision Number: CO20180032

State: Colorado

Construction Type: Building

County: El Paso County in Colorado.

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include single family homes or apartments up to and including 4 stories).

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.60 for calendar year 2019 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.60 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2019. If this contract is covered by the EO and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must pay workers in that classification at least the wage rate determined through the conformance process set forth in 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(ii) (or the EO minimum wage rate,if it is higher than the conformed wage rate). The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Please note that this EO applies to the above-mentioned types of contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but it does not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/04/2019 1 02/01/2019

Am #0004 CO190022 - 2 02/01/2019

ASBE0028-002 07/01/2018

ASBESTOS WORKER/HEAT & FROST

INSULATOR - MECHANICAL (Duct, Pipe & Mechanical System Insulation)......................$ 31.73 14.23

ELEC0113-005 06/01/2018

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN (Includes Low Voltage Wiring)..................$ 31.80 15.90

* ELEV0025-001 01/01/2019

Rates Fringes

ELEVATOR MECHANIC................$ 45.05 34.125

FOOTNOTE:

a.Vacation: 6%/under 5 years based on regular hourly rate for all hours worked. 8%/over 5 years based on regular hourly rate for all hours worked.

b. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Veterans' Day; Thanksgiving Day; the Friday after Thanksgiving Day; and Christmas Day.

ENGI0009-017 05/01/2017

Rates Fringes

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

(Crane) 141 tons and over...........$ 29.82 10.10 50 tons and under...........$ 27.75 10.10 51 to 90 tons...............$ 27.92 10.10 91 to 140 tons..............$ 28.55 10.10

IRON0024-009 06/01/2018

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER, ORNAMENTAL...........$ 27.45 12.34

IRON0024-011 06/01/2018

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER, STRUCTURAL...........$ 27.45 12.34

Am #0004 CO190022 - 3 02/01/2019

PAIN0079-009 08/01/2017

PAINTER (Spray)..................$ 20.50 8.41

PLAS0577-002 05/01/2018

Rates Fringes

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 27.13 12.10

PLUM0058-003 07/01/2018

Rates Fringes

PLUMBER (Excludes HVAC Duct, Pipe and Unit Installation)......$ 32.75 14.85

PLUM0058-004 07/01/2018

Rates Fringes

PIPEFITTER, Includes HVAC Pipe Installation (Excludes HVAC Duct and Unit Installation)....................$ 32.75 14.85

SFCO0669-002 04/01/2017

Rates Fringes

SPRINKLER FITTER (Fire Sprinklers)......................$ 36.73 20.47

SHEE0009-005 07/01/2018

Rates Fringes

SHEET METAL WORKER (Excludes HVAC Duct, Pipe and Unit Installation)....................$ 34.02 17.49

SUCO2013-008 07/31/2015

Rates Fringes

BRICKLAYER.......................$ 21.96 0.00

CARPENTER........................$ 22.63 6.98

LABORER: Common or General......$ 13.40 1.40

LABORER: Mason Tender - Brick...$ 15.99 0.00

Am #0004 CO190022 - 4 02/01/2019

LABORER: Mason Tender - Cement/Concrete..................$ 16.00 0.00

LABORER: Pipelayer..............$ 16.96 3.68

OPERATOR:

Backhoe/Excavator/Trackhoe.......$ 20.26 8.62

OPERATOR: Bobcat/Skid Steer/Skid Loader................$ 18.58 2.42

OPERATOR: Grader/Blade..........$ 21.50 0.00

PAINTER (Brush and Roller).......$ 17.20 0.00

ROOFER...........................$ 16.71 0.00

SHEET METAL WORKER (HVAC Duct Installation Only)...............$ 25.18 6.30

SHEET METAL WORKER (HVAC Unit Installation Only)...............$ 24.00 2.18

TRUCK DRIVER: Dump Truck........$ 17.34 0.00

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

Am #0004 CO190022 - 5 02/01/2019

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of "identifiers" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than "SU" or "UAVG" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the "SU" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Am #0004 CO190022 - 6 02/01/2019

Union Average Rate Identifiers

Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010 08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Am #0004 CO190022 - 7 02/01/2019

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

Section 00 22 00 W9128F19R0004

Section 00 22 00 Page 1 Am #0004

SECTION 00 22 00 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF

AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

4.1. VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL

4.2. VOLUME 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

4.3. VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO-FORMA INFORMATION

5.0 VOLUME 1 –FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL

5.1. TAB A –SUBFACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.2. TAB B –SUBFACTOR 2 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.3. TAB C –SUBFACTOR 3 – KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

6.0 VOLUME 2 – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1 TAB A - FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

7.0 VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

7.1. GENERAL

7.2. TAB A – FACTOR 3 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND CONTRACT

LINE ITEM SCHEDULE)

7.3. TAB B – EVIDENCE OF BONDABILITY

7.4. TAB C– REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

8.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

8.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

8.2. EVALUATION

8.3. DEFINITIONS

8.4. EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

8.5. PAST PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

ATTACHMENTS

1 - NOT USED

2 - NOT USED

Section 00 22 00 Page 2

3 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR

4 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DESIGN FIRM OR IN-HOUSE DESIGN CAPABILITY

5 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE KEY SUBCONTRACTOR (OR PRIME IF WORK NOT TO BE

SUBCONTRACTED)

6 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TELEPHONE INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE

7 - KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

8 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

9 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR (DESIGN FIRM OR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR)

10 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

Section 00 22 00 Page 3

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1. This is a “Best Value-Tradeoff” solicitation for the Design and Construction of the SOF Human Performance Training Center at Fort Carson, Colorado. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm-fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

1.2. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

[*Am-2] In an effort to reduce paperwork and reduce cost, all proposals shall be submitted electronically via the AMRDEC SAFE website. In the event that the AMRDEC SAFE website remains disabled, submit proposals on CD/DVD as described in the NOTE below. All submissions, other than the Supplemental Price Breakdown (see paragraph 7.2.1.2), shall be in Adobe PDF format with Optical Character Recognition (OCR) applied to all documents that will enable word searches to be conducted using Adobe-compatible PDF software. The Supplemental Price Breakdown may be submitted in Excel format to the recipients listed below via email and must be submitted no later than three working days after the proposal submission. The three (3) volumes listed below shall be submitted as “SEPARATE” single files via AMRDEC. Offerors may use compression utilities such as 7-Zip, WinZip or PKZip to reduce file size and facilitate transmission when using AMRDEC. Offerors are encouraged to send all three (3) files in the same AMRDEC transmission, if possible.

Volume I: Technical and Small Business Utilization Volume II: Past Performance Volume III: Price and Pro Forma Information

Title the single files in the following format:

W9128F19R0004_Company Name_Volume_I_Technical W9128F19R0004_Company Name_Volume_II_Past_Performance W9128F19R0004_Company Name_Volume_III_Price_and_Pro_Forma_Information

(Note: Company name may be abbreviated)

It is imperative that none of the pricing or Volume 3 information show up in Volumes 1 or 2.

To submit proposals electronically via AMRDEC SAFE, go to the following website:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE/ At the AMRDEC SAFE website select “Non-CAC Users” in order to register, access the site and submit your proposal(s). When completing the information for transmittal at the AMRDEC SAFE website, you will be asked to enter e-mail addresses for the recipients. When your proposal is submitted via the AMRDEC SAFE website, the website will provide notification of the submittal to the recipients. For this solicitation, the recipients will be:

Mr. Bill Rawe, william.t.rawe@usace.army.mil Ms. Christine Wilson, christine.l.wilson@usace.army.mil

After submitting your information, you will receive two (2) disclaimers:

A. “The files were successfully uploaded.”

B. “Your files cannot be downloaded by recipients until you verify your email address. Please check your email for further instructions.”

***OFFERORS MUST FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS SENT TO YOUR EMAIL TO COMPLETE THE

SUBMITTAL PROCESS***

For the purposes of determining whether the proposal was received “late” in accordance with FAR 15.208, the date and time the file(s) are uploaded into the AMRDEC SAFE website as identified in the AMRDEC e-mail sent to the Contract Specialist(s)/Contracting Officer will be the time and date the Government received the proposal. Please note that the process involves two steps, after the proposal has been uploaded to the AMRDEC SAFE website the Offeror must verify its email address in order for the Government to receive access to the proposal uploaded onto the AMRDEC SAFE website. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal.

Section 00 22 00 Page 4

[*Am-2] NOTE: In the event that the AMRDEC website remains disabled, Offeror shall submit one CD/DVD containing their proposal to the following address prior to the proposal due date and time:

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Rocky Mountain Area Office Attn: CONTRACTING DIVISION (CENWO-CT-M) 5475 Tech Center Drive, Suite 205 Colorado Springs, CO 80919

In the event that Offerors choose to hand-carry their proposals, Offerors shall contact Bill Rawe, Contract Specialist, 402-996-3722, william.t.rawe@usace.army.mil at least one business day prior to delivery to ensure availability of appropriate Government personnel to receive the package in person. Offers shall be received by the date and time indicated in Block 13 of the SF 1442 for this solicitation or as identified in subsequent amendments.

1.3. PROPOSAL FORMAT

Written materials: 8 ½” x 11” format using 10 point or larger font size. For each volume, provide a title sheet on the cover and table of contents. Volume 1 shall have bookmarks, at a minimum, corresponding to each factor and sub-factor. Provide a title sheet identifying the prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, telephone, and email address and point of contact. Include the signature, title and contact information of the official that can bind the firm. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

Volume number and tab section submitted shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number and revision date for the amended page, if necessary)

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

2.1. The Contracting Officer will award a firm-fixed-price contract to that responsible Offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than cost or price, when combined, are equal to cost or price; however, the Contract award should not exceed the cost limitation described in Section 00 21 00 for this project. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Official must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the cost limitation) would justify award to that offeror.

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.1. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.2. The proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the requirements of the RFP. The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail and should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

3.3. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror’s evaluation.

Section 00 22 00 Page 5

3.4. Firms formally organized as design-build entities, design firms and construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. Any legally organized Offeror may submit a proposal, provided that the Offeror or Offeror’s subcontractor has or will have professional architects and engineers, registered in the appropriate technical disciplines and provided that the requirements specified in Contract clause, “Requirements for Registration of Designers”, are met. All designs must be under the direct supervision of appropriately licensed professionals for each discipline involved.

3.5. Submit proposals per paragraph 1.2 above. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

4.1. VOLUME 1 –TECHNICAL

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 1 TECHNICAL

Factor 1 is slightly more important than Factor

2. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are equal to than cost or price (Factor 3).

Subfactor 1 Vol. 1 TAB A Specialized Experience Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 2 Vol. 1 TAB B Project Management Plan Second most Important Subfactor (slightly less than Subfactor 1)

Subfactor 3 Vol. 1 TAB C Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience

3rd most Important Subfactor (significantly less important than Subfactor 2)

4.2. VOLUME 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 2 Vol. 2 TAB A Past Performance

Factor 1 is slightly more important than Factor

2. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are equal to cost or price (Factor 3).

N/A Relevancy Used in determining rating for Factor 2

N/A Confidence Used in determining rating for Factor 2

4.3. VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 3 Vol. 3 TAB A Price (Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet And Contract Line Item Schedule)

Factor 1 is slightly more important than Factor

2. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are equal to cost or price (Factor 3).

Section 00 22 00 Page 6

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance

N/A Vol. 3 TAB B Evidence of Bondability Not Rated

N/A Vol. 3 TAB C Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

NOTE: 8(a) Joint Venture Offeror or Offeror submitting Proposal as HubZone Joint Venture shall submit evidence from Offerors SBA Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or business Opportunity Specialist.

5.0 VOLUME 1 –FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL

5.1. VOLUME 1 -TAB A – SUBFACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1.1. Submission Requirements:

5.1.1.1. Construction and Design Projects. The Offeror shall submit a total of six (6) projects as follows. The Offeror shall submit three (3) projects performed by the Prime Construction Entity while in the same capacity as Prime Construction Entity. Additionally, the Offeror shall submit three (3) projects performed by the Lead Design Entity while in the same capacity as Lead Design Entity. The proposed prime construction and lead design entities shall have performed in the same role as the prime or lead entities on the projects submitted. Limit one (1) page per project submitted. Any information presented beyond the page limit will not be evaluated.

5.1.1.2. Teaming Experience. In one page, the Offeror shall demonstrate previous teaming experience between current team members. Teaming experience information is limited to projects that are well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past ten (10) years preceding the issue date of this solicitation. If the Offeror has no teaming experience to demonstrate, a statement stating so shall be included in place of the “Teaming Experience” page.

5.1.1.3. Project Information. All projects submitted should demonstrate experience on similar projects (design/construction complexity and size) of similar or greater value. Submit projects that are currently well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than ten (10) years preceding the issue date of this solicitation. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements set forth in the RFP. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. If the Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member.

If projects were design-build, so identify them.

Project information shall CLEARLY include:

(a) Type of Facility Represented

(b) Name of Firm

(c) Name of Project

(d) Location of Project

(e) Owner, including reference POC with confirmed contact information

(f) General Scope of Construction Project

Section 00 22 00 Page 7

(g) Summary of Your Role in the Project. Indicate that you were the prime construction entity for construction projects or the lead design entity for the design projects.

(h) Construction Cost at completion

(i) Percent (%) and Type of Work Subcontracted Out

(j) Dates Construction Began and Completed

5.1.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.1.2.1. Experience on similar projects that exceed the scope (complexity and/or size) and/or value may be rated more favorably. A similar project does not necessarily have to perform the same mission, but should be of similar design and construction complexity and size.

5.1.2.2. Federal Government project experience may be rated more favorably than non-Federal Government project experience.

5.1.2.3. Projects that are not “well underway” or completed as defined above may be rated less favorably.

5.1.2.4. Previous design-build experience is not necessary for an acceptable rating. The Government may consider previous D-B experience a strength.

5.1.2.5. The Government may consider previous recent (as defined above) teaming experience among the team members as a strength. The more relevant the experience (as defined above), the more favorably it may be rated.

5.1.2.6. Note: The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing DoD or Government appraisal systems, or through interviewing owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.1.2.7. Note: A firm will not receive credit under this subfactor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project while employed at a different firm.

5.2. VOLUME 1 - TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.2.1. Submission Requirements:

5.2.1.1. Provide information that describes the offeror’s Project Management approach to executing the design-build contract per the detailed requirements herein. Clearly and concisely describe the organizational and technical approaches to project management and execution, and proposed contract duration. Limit the information to fifteen (15) pages or less.

5.2.1.2. Organization. List the design and construction entities and describe their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each entity’s roles and responsibilities on the project. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) shall be appended to the plan (not included in the page limitation). Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s).

Identify the design firm(s) chosen for the project, if not to be self-performed. The Offeror shall document unequivocal teaming arrangements with its lead design entity (ies) and key subcontractors (see attachment 9). Describe the proposed management structure for the team, describing the how the design and construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team. Include a key personnel organization chart that clearly depicts the key positions and the names of the personnel, their firm affiliations and their job locations and their job/position title within the organization. The key personnel organization chart shall be consistent with the corporate organization chart, with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the D-B team entities, and with the list

Section 00 22 00 Page 8 of key personnel to be provided under the Tab, “KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND

EXPERIENCE”.

5.2.1.3. Technical Approach for Design and Construction. Describe the technical approach to design and construction of the facility. Include any considerations of fast-tracking design and construction, panelized construction, pre-engineered components, etc. The Government is looking for ways to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints in an effort to reduce costs and achieve an aggressive schedule while minimizing impact to the base.

5.2.1.4. Risk Assessment. Submit a list of risks specifically associated with this project. Identify the degree of risk, possible impact of the risk on project (schedule, cost, safety etc.), whether it’s within or outside the Offeror’s control, and a plan to mitigate the risk(s).

5.2.1.5. Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror shall propose the contract duration in the appropriate Contract Line Item Number in the CLIN Schedule and should not exceed the benchmark performance duration specified in the CLIN. The offeror shall also list this duration in this tab of the proposal.

5.2.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.2.2.1. Organization. The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of the overall organization and how well it is organized, structured and staffed to execute the entire scope of work. This subfactor will be rated as unacceptable if the Offeror has not selected and committed to use its lead design entity.

Joint venture participants’ contribution to the organization should be commensurate with their skills and background.

5.2.2.2. Technical Approach for Design and Construction. The Government places a higher value on an offer that provides proposed methods to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints, in an effort to reduce costs and support an aggressive schedule including such things as fast-tracking, etc. The Government will also consider whether the approach reduces on-site craft labor and susceptibility to inclement weather delays.

5.2.2.3. Risk Assessment. The Government will evaluate the risk assessment to verify that the Offeror has a clear understanding of the risks, roles, and scope of the project. Proposals may be rated more favorable for risk assessments that are clearly identified with logical and accurate assessments of each risk.

5.2.2.4. Proposed Contract Duration: Unless changed during negotiations, this duration will become the contractually binding performance period. The Government will rate the proposed duration matching or shorter than the benchmark duration as “acceptable”. No advantage will be considered for proposals that provide a duration shorter than the proposed benchmark. A proposed duration that is longer than the proposed benchmark duration will be viewed as a deficiency. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places undue risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment.

5.3. VOLUME 1 - TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 - KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

5.3.1. Submission Requirements:

5.3.1.1. For key personnel…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it.