sf30-19r9-am3.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

AM-0003 06 May 2019

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

CECT – Contracting Division USACE, Honolulu District Bldg 252 (CECT-POH) Ft Shafter, HI 96858-5440

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State, and Zip Code) (x) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

W9128A-19-R-0009 X

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04/08/2019

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[ X ]The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ X ] is extended, [ ] is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __1__ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not, [ ] is required to sign this document and return _ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PN 92743 Repair Bucholz Army Airfield, Kwajalein Island, U.S. Army Kwajalein Atoll (USAKA), Republic of the Marshall Islands

See Page 2 of 2 Pages

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Am-0003 Standard Form 30

RFP No. W9128A-19-R-0009 Page 2 of 2 Pages

Item No. 14 (Continued)

1. CHANGES TO SPECIFICATIONS. Attached hereto are new, revised and deleted sections to the specifications. Revised pages replace like-numbered pages. The revision mark (Am-0003) is shown on each revised page.

A. REVISED SECTIONS. The following sections were revised with changes shown in bold and red colored font for additions, and strike through with deletions.

Section 00 22 16:

Paragraph A, sub-paragraphs 1.3.3, 1.4.1

B. ADDITIONS TO SECTIONS. The following sections are added in its entirety.

Section 00 73 00, Port of Kwajalein Information

Section 00 73 00, Requests for Information #1 to 156

Note: The answers to the requests for information in this amendment are made part of the contract and supercedes the responses in PROJNET.

2. CHANGES TO DRAWINGS. The following revised drawings replace like-numbered drawings and are issued herewith:

REV NO. SHEET IDENTIFICATION REVISION DATE

1 CP-312 May 02, 2019

1 CP-313 May 02, 2019

1 CP-706 May 02, 2019

1 CP-707 May 02, 2019

3. The proposal due date has changed. See SF1442, Block 13A.

DESIGN-BID-BUILD CONSTRUCTIONS SERVICES FOR REPAIR BUCHOLZ ARMY AIRFIELD RUNWAY, KWAJALEIN ATOLL, REPUBLIC OF THE

MARSHALL ISLANDS

MAGNITUDE OF CONSTRUCTION: BETWEEN $100,000,000 AND $250,000,000

THE PROJECT WILL BE INCREMENTALLY FUNDED. $107M IS AVAILABLE FOR AWARD WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE FUNDING EXPECTED

BY 30 SEPTEMBER THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR.

RAYMOND R GREENHECK 808-835-4380

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

08-Apr-2019

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within _______10 calendar days and complete it within ________ 738 calendar days after receiving award, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________5 copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________ 15 May 2019 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______ 90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

CECT - CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, HONOLULU DISTRICT

BLDG 252 (CECT-POH)

FT. SHAFTER HI 96858-5440

W9128A

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour) Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

92743

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX: TEL: TEL: FAX:

W9128A19R0009 78

(Am-0003)

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00 22 16 – Page 1

Section 00 22 16 – Supplementary Instructions to Proposers

EVALUATION FACTORS

A. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION (Section 00 22 16)

1.0 Proposal Submission Requirements

a. Each volume shall be submitted; one (1) CD for each volume, as well as hard copies; five (5) of technical Volume 1, and three (3) of Pricing Volume 2. Any portion of the proposal that is changed (as a result of negotiations or proposal revisions) should be annotated and dated. Each volume shall be clearly labeled with its title and a copy number (e.g., copy 1 of 5).

b. Each paragraph should be single spaced. Do not use a font size smaller than 10 pitch, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print. Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required for any submission. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be produced in landscape mode.

c. The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

Volume Title Hard Copies

I Technical (Factors 1 through 4) 5

II Price and Bonding 3

II

Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents, and

Certifications / Representations

1.1 Cost of Preparing Proposals.

The Government will not reimburse any Offeror for any costs incurred in the preparation and submittal of its proposal in response to this solicitation.

1.2 Submittal of Proposals

Proposals may be submitted via U.S. Postal Service, courier service, or personally delivered as follows:

Proposals submitted via U.S. Postal Services shall be mailed to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District

Contracting Division (CEPOH-CT), ATTN: Mr. Raymond Greenheck / Ms. Merbby Nicolas

Bldg. 230, Otake Street

Fort Shafter, Hawaii 96858-5440

Proposals submitted via courier service or hand delivered shall be delivered to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District

Contracting Division (CEPOH-CT), ATTN: Mr. Raymond Greenheck / Ms. Merbby Nicolas

Bldg. 252, Walker Drive

Fort Shafter, Hawaii 96858-5440

Proposals must be clearly identified on the shipping package with the RFP number.

Proposal received by telegraph, facsimile and/or e-mail will not be accepted.

Section 00 22 16 – Page 2

Proposals received by the Government after the date and time set for receipt of proposals will be handled in accordance with the requirements of Provision “52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors Competitive Acquisition (Jan

2017),” subparagraph (c), found in Section 00 22 16.

1.3 Proposal Format

1.3.1 Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be identified with the appropriate page number, centered at the bottom of the page, and the complete company name, date and Request for Proposal (RFP) number shall be identified in the header and/or footer. The terms RFP and solicitation are used interchangeably. All pages margins must be at least one (1) inch wide, and may include headers and footers. Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8 ½ inches by 11 inches, unless another paper size is specifically authorized.

The following additional restrictions apply:

1.3.2 File Packaging. Provide read-only PDF file format in searchable text software containing the technical and price volume. Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of

Contents. Each disc shall be externally labeled with the solicitation number, volume number, date, and the Offeror’s name. If the hard copy proposal differs from the electronic version, the hard copy will govern. If the electronic files are of a size which it must be compressed (zipped), it shall be compressed into one file using WinZip version 6.2 or later. Self-extracting .exe files are not acceptable.

1.3.3 Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The technical proposal will be appropriately organized using the tabs specified in the chart below. The proposals shall contain a detailed table of contents. The first page shall be a cover sheet identifying the Offeror (name, address, and point of contact), contract description, and solicitation number shall be provided. The second sheet shall be a Table of Contents.

Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – Volume 1

A The Proposal Cover Sheet

B Airfield Paving Construction Experience

C Organization and Management Plan

D Technical Approach

E Past Performance

1.3.4 Specific Instructions for the Technical Proposal (Volume 1)

Proposal shall contain the entire proposal in .pdf format using Adobe Acrobat software to print to a .pdf file; do

NOT scan the document(s) into a .pdf file. The text portion of the Volume I proposal shall be contained as a single

.pdf file in searchable text. Sections of the proposal shall be bookmarked (linked to the index) in logical order.

Offerors shall submit all technical proposal documentation in Adobe PDF format on:

Five (5) hard copies each for each proposal (1 original and 4 copies); and

One (1) CD ROM as one PDF file titled:

W9128A-19-R-0009_COMPANY NAME_TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

1.4 Specific Instructions for the Price Proposal (Volume 2)

1.4.1 Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents, as indicated in the following chart

Section 00 22 16 – Page 3 below. The first page shall be a cover sheet identifying the Offeror (name, address, and point of contact), contract description, and solicitation number shall be provided. The second sheet shall be a Table of

Contents, as indicated in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL – Volume 2

1 Coversheet

2 The SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

3 Section 00 10 00, Proposal Schedule

4 Bonding Capability

Copy of Representations and Certifications completed electronically via the System for

Award Management (SAM.gov).

6 JV Agreement or Articles of Organization for LLC, if applicable.

Volume 2, Tab 2: The SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award is to be completed by all Offerors and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with FAR 4.102. All amendments must be acknowledged by all Offerors in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation.

Volume 2, Tab 3: The Offeror shall provide a completed Section 00 10 00, Proposal Schedule in read-only PDF format. The PDF file may not be password protected.

Offerors shall submit the price proposal in a second envelope that is clearly marked, “PRICE PROPOSAL, VOLUME 2, RFP NO. W9128A-19-R-0009.”

Offerors shall submit the price proposal documentation on:

Three (3) hard copies for each proposal (1 original and 2 copies); and

One (1) CD ROM as one PDF file titled:

W9128A-19-R-0009_COMPANY NAME_PRICE PROPOSAL

Volume 2, Tab 4: Submit an original letter from the Offeror’s surety(ies) stating that the Offeror has sufficient bonding capacity for performance and payment bonds equal to or greater than the proposed Total Base Schedule

Plus Options, and the Surety’s assurance that it intends to provide such bonds if the Offeror is awarded the contract.

Volume 2, Tab 5: All Offerors must have electronically completed the annual Representations and Certifications on the System for Award Management (SAM) Website at www.sam.gov or respond with the completed

Representations / Certifications found in the solicitation. The Offerors are responsible for ensuring that these on-line

Representations and Certifications are updated as necessary to reflect changes, but at least annually to ensure that it is kept current, accurate and complete. Additionally, the Offeror must also complete and return the “Section 00 45

00 - Representations and Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors” included in the solicitation. If the

Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) and it does not have the SAM Representations and Certifications as a JV, all participants of the JV must separately complete the SAM Representations and Certification.

Volume 2, Tab 6: Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable): If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), include a copy of the finalized / approved JV Agreement. JV Agreements must clearly indicate the percentages of the JV participants, in particular the percent of the controlling party, and a clear delineation of responsibilities and authorities between the JV parties. If the Offeror is a Limited Liability Company, include a copy of the Articles of

Organization / Incorporation.

Section 00 22 16 – Page 4

In the case of an Offeror that is part of a large, multi-segmented business concern, provide information directly pertaining to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) that will perform work under the prospective contract.

Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab (such as a JV Agreement) in accordance with the instructions below, the tab can be omitted.

Solicitations, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations shall not be addressed separately from that submitted in VOLUME 2.

1.5 Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each Factor:

Factor 1 – Airfield Paving Construction Experience

Factor 2 – Organization and Management Plan. A total of five (5) single-sided pages. Of the five (5) pages, one (1) single-sided no larger than 11”x17” shall be for the Organizational Chart in accordance with Volume 1, Tab C, paragraph 2.1.

Factor 3 – Technical Approach. A total of ten (10) single-sided pages.

Factor 4 – Past Performance – No page limitation

Factor 5 – Price – No page limitation

For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page;

information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Where authorized, fold-out pages (11” x 14” or 11” x 17”) will count as one page. Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a “Table of Contents” or divider tabs, are not included in the page limitation.

B. BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government intends to award a single contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering the evaluation factors described herein. The non-price technical factors when combined, are significantly more important than price. Offerors will be cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest price offered. The

Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced Offeror or to reject all Offerors. To receive consideration for award, an Offeror must receive a rating of no less than “Acceptable” for each of the Technical factors.

If awarded the contract, the Offeror shall construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications.

1.0 Contract Award

The evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Department of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 215.3, Army Federal Acquisition Regulation

Supplement (AFARS) 5225.3, Department of Defense Source Selection Procedures, Army Source Selection

Supplement (AS3) to the Department of Defense Source Selection Procedures, and this solicitation. Award will be made to the Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 9, conforms to the solicitation requirements (such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications).

Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the Offeror being considered non awardable.

1.1. Award without Discussions

The Government intends to award without discussions IAW FAR 52.215-1; however, IAW FAR Subpart 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions. Therefore, Offerors are advised to submit proposals that are fully and clearly acceptable without additional information. If award will be made without conducting discussions, the Offeror may only be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of proposals (e.g., the relevance of an Offeror’s past performance information and adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond) or to resolve minor or clerical errors.

Section 00 22 16 – Page 5

1.2 Competitive Range/Discussions

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with Offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the Offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the best value to the Government, price and other factors considered.

If discussions are deemed necessary, they will be held only with those Offerors determined to be in the competitive range. The Contracting Officer may establish a competitive range comprised of the most highly rated proposals based on the rating of each evaluation factor against the evaluation criteria. The competitive range may be further reduced for purposes of efficiency pursuant to FAR 15.306(c)(2). If the Government elects to open discussions, it has sole discretion as to whether an Offeror is in the competitive range, and may include proposals rated

“Unacceptable” under the Technical factors. Offerors whose proposals are not included in the competitive range will be notified as soon as practicable.

Discussions will include issuance of evaluation notices with its significant weaknesses, deficiencies, adverse past performance, and any other aspects of the Offeror’s proposal that could enhance materially the Offeror’s proposal for award. During discussions, the Government may ask the Offeror to further explain and / or to answer questions about its proposal. An Offeror initially included in the competitive range may be eliminated from consideration for award during discussions. At the conclusion of discussions, each Offeror still within the competitive range shall be given an opportunity to submit a Final Proposal Revision (FPR) for final evaluation and selection.

C. FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal:

VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

TAB A The Proposal Cover Sheet

Factor LOCATION DESCRIPTION RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

FACTOR 1 Vol 1 Tab B Airfield Paving

Construction Experience

Most Important Technical Factor

(Equally important to Factor 4)

FACTOR 2 Vol 1 Tab C Management Plan /

Organization

Equally important to Factor 3, less important than Factor 1.

FACTOR 3 Vol 1 Tab D Technical Approach Equally important to Factor 2, less important than Factor 1.

FACTOR 4 Vol 1 Tab E Past Performance Less Important than Factors 2 and 3

(Equally important to Factor 1)

Factor 5, Price, is the least important factor. The resulting award will be a Firm Fixed Price contract. Price reasonableness will be utilized in the evaluation of the Firm-Fixed Price effort.

D. EVALUATION APPROACH

The Offeror’s Volume 1 and Volume 2 proposal will be evaluated as specified below:

1.0 VOLUME 1, TAB B – FACTOR 1 - AIRFIELD PAVING CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE

1.1 Submission Requirements:

1.2 Factor 1 Overview.

This factor evaluates the Offeror’s proposed Airfield Paving Construction Experience for the base contract and all options. The Offeror (or prime contractor) and its team shall demonstrate experience on contracts with similar features, magnitudes, and complexities to this RFP. The Offeror is expected to explain how its experience is similar to airfield paving construction as described in this RFP (including but not limited to Specification Section

Section 00 22 16 – Page 6

32 13 14.13). The Offeror shall explain how its experience is similar to the management and coordination complexity (such as multiple contractors, stakeholders, joint occupancies and a Temporary Workforce Camp) expected for this RFP.

1.2.1 The Offeror shall submit a maximum of five (5) contracts.

A “contract” is defined as a single contract or a single task order performed under a MATOC (Multiple Award Task

Order Contract)/SATOC (Single Award Task Order Contract)/IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity

Contract).

Data presented shall include construction contracts relevant to this requirement as provided in the solicitation’s technical narrative which the Offeror’s team has completed, or which are currently under construction and are substantially complete. Relevant construction experience will be limited to performance of contracts similar in size, scope, and complexity to that outlined in the solicitation. The Offeror shall submit a maximum of five (5) contracts. If more than five (5) contracts are submitted, only the first five (5) contracts will be evaluated. The

Offeror shall submit a completed Attachment A “Experience Information” form for each contract. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current and complete. Each contract shall be described in two pages or less. Any pages that exceed this limitation will not be considered. The information in Attachment A includes, but is not limited to, the following contract information:

a. Contract title, contract number, and location.

b. Contract type (for example, Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity task order; Design/Build;

Design-Bid-Build; Firm Fixed-Price; Cost Plus, etc.)

c. Total dollar award amount, and the total dollar amount at completion of the contract.

d. Start and completion dates (month/year) or percentage until complete to include actual completion date

(month/year).

e. Role of Offeror, provide a detailed description (address type of work self-performed, to include design, and percentage and type of self-performed work, as applicable for each team member, and type of work sub-contracted out)

f. Brief description of contract and how it relates to this solicitation.

g. Customer primary Point of Contact (POC) and alternate POC (name, relationship to the contract [Administering Contracting Officer / Contracting Officer Representative, etc.], agency/firm affiliation, city, state, current phone number, and e-mail address)

h. Awards or recognition received, where applicable

Note: If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) and the JV does not have experience working as a JV, the partners of the

JV may submit experience on behalf of the Offeror. All references herein to “the Offeror” include all proposed joint venture partners. Submitted contracts by members of a joint-venture or from the joint-venture itself will be considered and evaluated as long as the member or joint-venture itself was the prime contractor. Sub-contractor experience may be submitted on behalf of the Offeror provided the Offeror provides a copy of a binding teaming agreement or binding letter of commitment from that sub-contractor to perform the work required in this RFP for the Offeror. Information provided from potential sub-contractors (not included in the joint venture) will not be considered or evaluated

The JV shall submit no more than five (5) contracts, but each respective JV partner must submit at least one (1) contract under this Factor.

1.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The Government will evaluate the extent of relevant experience of the prime contractor. If an Offeror submits a proposal as a joint venture, the Government will evaluate the experience of its proposed JV team and the roles each member of the JV team will have in performing this contract. If an Offeror submits a binding agreement or letter from a sub-contractor as specified in Para 1.2.1, the Government will evaluate the experience of the proposed sub-contractor in relation to its proposed role in performing this contract. The extent of relevant experience will be determined based on the similarity of the submitted contracts to the size, scope, and complexity of the construction required by the solicitation. For the purposes of this solicitation, a recent contract is defined as

Section 00 22 16 – Page 7 at least 80% complete or turned over within the past seven (7) years preceding the issuance date of this RFP.

When assessing an Offeror’s relevant experience, the Government intends to give greater weight to each of the following:

a. Proposals that include a higher number of relevant contracts, up to a maximum of five.

b. Construction contracts for airfield paving with asphalt paving.

c. Construction contracts for airfield paving with Portland Cement concrete.

d. New / renovation construction contracts for airfield paving with an award amount of $50,000,000 or more.

e. Construction contracts for airfield paving where airfield operations continue within and/or adjacent to the project site.

f. New / renovation construction contracts demonstrating experience with underground electrical and plumbing.

g. New / renovation construction contracts with a temporary workforce camp.

See paragraph 6.2, Combined Technical / Risk Rating, Table 1, for the evaluation rating system for Factor 1, Airfield Paving Construction Experience.

2.0 VOLUME 1, TAB C – FACTOR 2 – MANAGEMENT PLAN / ORGANIZATION

2.1 Submission Requirements:

Organization. Describe what firms will be included to include its roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements the Offeror has established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each firm’s roles and responsibilities on the project. Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s), and risk management team(s). Identify the firms selected for the project, if work is not to be self-performed. The Offeror shall describe the proposed management structure of the team, and how the construction process will be managed.

1.2.3 Evaluation Criteria:

The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of the overall organization and how well it is organized, structured, and staffed to execute the entire scope of work. If applicable, joint venture participants’ contribution to the organization shall be commensurate with its skills and background.

See paragraph 6.2, Combined Technical / Risk Rating, Table 1, for the evaluation rating system for Factor 2.

3.0 VOLUME 1, TAB D – FACTOR 3 – TECHNICAL APPROACH

3.1 Submission Requirements:

3.1.1 Technical Approach. Offerors shall provide a narrative of how it will manage and construct the project.

The Offeror shall describe its ability to maintain operability using reliable and proven methods in consideration of the following challenges:

Construction of an airfield, during ongoing flight operations.

Ongoing construction of an airfield and how the Offeror will provide access and protection to the aircraft, aircraft personnel, and aircraft passengers during construction.

Risk management framework interrelationship between ongoing flight operations.

Coordination with the Government, and other stakeholders.

Scheduling around adverse / seasonal weather conditions.

The Offeror shall relate the project scope features to the construction process considering the impact of environmental considerations, work sequencing, work by others, and resource management. The Offeror shall describe its understanding of construction in highly corrosive climates, construction in isolated areas, working with

Section 00 22 16 – Page 8 other prime contractors on the same work site and/or in the same facility during on-going construction, while achieving beneficial occupancy date milestone.

The Offeror shall describe its understanding of airfield paving construction and explain how it will execute the construction of the project to include mobilization and demobilization of equipment, and the storage and management of supplies and materials.

Offeror shall describe reliable/proven methods for construction of an airfield at a confined area adjacent to on-going construction by another prime contractor.

3.1.2 Self-Performed Work. Generally describe the types of work the Offeror will self-perform to comply with the requirements in clause 52.236-1, Performance of Work by the Contactor, for self-performed work.

3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

3.2.1 Technical Approach. The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, and any deficiencies in the technical approach to which the Offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the requirements within the required schedule based upon proven methods and techniques. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s understanding of the requirements described in the technical specification of the solicitation. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposal to determine if the proposed approach is workable and achievable. The Government intends to assess each Offeror’s plan to determine how well the Offeror understands the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s understanding of construction in highly corrosive climates, construction in isolated areas, working with other prime contractors on the same work site and/or same facility under construction to achieve the beneficial occupancy date milestone. Additional consideration will be given to a detailed approach that identifies specific elements that present the greatest risk to project success and describe the approach to mitigate the risks.

See paragraph 6.4, Combined Technical / Risk Rating, Table 1, for the evaluation rating system for Factor 3.

3.2.2 Self-Performed Work. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposal to ensure that self-performed work complies with the requirements of Clause 52.236-1 for self-performed work.

4.0 VOLUME 1, TAB E – FACTOR 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE

4.1 Submission Requirements:

4.1.1 Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective. For each project submitted under Factor 1, the Offeror shall provide past performance information. For Federal projects, the

Offeror may submit finalized CCASS or CPARS reports. If a finalized CCASS or CPARS report is not available, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the RFP is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project. The Offeror shall provide customer reference name(s), company affiliation and current contact information (phone number and email address) on the PPQ form, for each experience submitted for

Factor 1. Previously completed PPQ’s may be submitted; however, ensure current phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. The completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal and may be duplicated for submission on future solicitations. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first 2 pages of the PPQ (Attachment 1), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to Government via e-mail to W9128A-19-R-0009@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the

Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

4.1.2 Projects for which past performance information is submitted shall be well underway (fully designed and at least 80% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no more than seven (7) years preceding the issuance date of this RFP. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last seven (7) mailto:W9128A-19-R-0009@usace.army.mil

Section 00 22 16 – Page 9 years preceding the issuance date of this RFP, such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

4.1.3 In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance

Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture or teaming arrangement) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information

System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

4.1.4 An Offeror will not receive credit for relevant past performance of a parent, affiliate or separate division.

An Offeror may receive credit for relevant past performance under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example) if the Offeror demonstrates that its role on the submitted project is relevant to the role it proposes to perform on this project.

4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

4.2.1 The Government will first assess and rate the recency and relevancy of each recent project submitted by the

Offeror. The projects will include those submitted under the Factor 1 as well as from other sources as described above. This rating is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing overall past performance confidence assessment rating assigned to Factor 4. The past performance relevancy ratings are described in

Paragraph 6.3 below.

4.2.2 The Government will next consider how well the Offeror performed on the contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. With respect to relevancy, past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance. Past performance of a parent, affiliate or separate division will not be considered relevant unless the Offeror demonstrates that the resources of the parent, affiliate or separate division will affect the performance of the Offeror on this project. Past performance under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the Offeror’s role on the project is not considered relevant. Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, correcting construction errors, warranty work, etc. The Government will target areas covered in the requirements of this proposal including records of conforming to quality, schedule, cost control, customer satisfaction, O&M manuals, problem resolution of construction errors, warranty work, and safety. The Government places a higher value on projects which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the contractor used to resolve problems successfully. The rating for this factor will be expressed as a degree of confidence in the Offeror’s ability to successfully accomplish the contract requirements. The rating system used for the performance confidence assessment is described in Paragraph 6.4 below.

4.2.3 The entity will be rated on its own performance or that of its predecessor, if relevant. Past performance under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the Offeror’s role on the project is not considered relevant. If the Government does not obtain past performance information for the project identified by the Offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the Offeror through other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance confidence assessment will be considered

“Unknown Confidence (Neutral)”.

5.0 VOLUME 2, TAB 3, FACTOR 5 – PRICE

5.1 Submission Requirements:

Submit the properly filled out and executed SF 1442, along with the Proposal Schedule, 00 10 00. See instructions in

Section 00 22 16 – Page 10

Section 00 21 00, “Instructions to Offerors.”

5.1.1 MARSHALLESE CONTRACTORS: This RFP includes Contract Clause 52.219-4 regarding a 10% price evaluation preference for Marshallese business concerns. Marshallese business concerns electing to waive the evaluation preference shall submit a copy of clause 52.219-4 indicating such.

5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1 The Offeror’s proposed price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated to determine if it is fair and reasonable, using one or more of the price analysis techniques found at FAR 15.404-1(b). The Government may request supplemental price breakdown information to assist the Government in performing the price evaluation. The evaluation of all option CLINs will not obligate the Government to exercise any option.

5.2.1.1 Errors: The Offeror’s Cost/Price proposal will be reviewed for errors. The Offeror may be given an opportunity to clarify certain aspects of their proposal at the sole discretion of the Contracting Officer.

5.2.1.2 Award cannot be made at a price that exceeds that authorized by congress.

5.2.2 Supplemental Breakdown. If deemed necessary to evaluate elements of the price proposal The

Government will request a breakdown of elements of the price in a sealed envelope marked “Price Breakdown

Information,” in Excel format. The Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown. This information will not be needed sooner than three (3) working days after proposal submission due date. This information may be required for the initial proposal, and if requested, for any revised proposals. This information is not an opportunity for an Offeror to revise its non-price or price proposal.

The supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations described above. Offerors are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc. and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. The Government will presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract.

5.2.3 The Government will evaluate the proposal to determine if the Offeror has submitted an original letter from a reputable surety indicating that the Offeror has the ability to obtain at the total contract value (base and options).

The Government considers any bonding company listed on the US treasury circular 570 a reputable surety. A proposal that fails to meet the bonding letter requirement as specified in this paragraph will be ineligible for award.

General Instructions. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.402 and 15.403- 1, certified cost or pricing data are not required based on the fact that adequate competition is expected for this procurement. The

Government may request for information other than certified cost or pricing data, if the Contracting Officer determines that there is insufficient information available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions at FAR 15.403-1 apply. If requested, information submitted shall be prepared following the instruction in FAR 15.403-5. Additionally, in the event that adequate competition is not obtained, the Contracting Officer may incorporate FAR 52.215-20 entitled, “Requirements for Cost or Pricing Data or Information Other Than Cost or

Pricing Data,” into the solicitation and request a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data. There is no page limitations for this volume.

6.0 RATING CRITERIA

6.1 Definitions.

a. Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

b. Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Section 00 22 16 – Page 11

c. Significant Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

d. Strength. Any aspect of a proposal that, when judged against a stated evaluation criterion, enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.

e. Significant Strength. A significant strength appreciably enhances the merit of a proposal or appreciably enhances the probability of successful contract performance.

f. Deviation: Proposal implies or specifically offers a deviation below the specified criteria. The firm may or may not have called the deviation to the Government’s attention. A deviation is a deficiency.

The proposal must conform to the solicitation requirements for award.

6.2 Combined Technical/Risk Rating for Factors 1, 2 and 3.

In accordance with the Army Source Selection Supplement (AS3), Section 3.1, the Army methodology for evaluating Technical Approach and Related Risk is the Combined Technical/Risk Rating, (see Table 1 below). This methodology considers risk, in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. This rating scale will be used for Technical Factors 1, 2, and 3.

TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable.

Proposal is unawardable.

6.3 Past Performance Criteria - Recency and Relevancy.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the PWS.

6.3.1 Recency. A project is considered recent if it is currently well underway (designed and at least 80% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no more than seven (7) years preceding the issuance date of this RFP.

6.3.2 Relevancy. A project’s relevance is determined according to the similarity of the project to the work proposed by the RFP according to Table 2 below.

Section 00 22 16 – Page 12

Table 2 - Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

6.4 Past Performance – Confidence Assessment and Ratings

Quality Assessment. The Confidence Rating assesses the overall quality of the Offeror’s past performance.

Documented results from Past Performance Questionnaires, interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment.

The Government will utilize the Performance Confidence Assessment (see Table 3 below) to select the most appropriate confidence level for each Offeror.

TABLE 3 - Performance Confidence Assessments

Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant…