W9127N-15-R-0012_Amend_0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

NAME OF PROJECT: FALL CREEK DAM AND RESERVOIR ADULT FISH FACILITY WATER SUPPLY UPGRADE Amendment No. 0003 Makes the follow ing changes to Solicitation No. W9127N-15-R-0012:

(1) Change: Basis of Aw ard Section 4 A 2; Proposal Content Limitations adding "The 50 page limit does NOT include PPQs under Factor 2"

(2) Added information only draw ing FLD-64-127-80-5 that show s dimensions of the existing ball valves in the reservoir that are to be removed and correction in the Draw ing index sheet G-001.

(3) Updated various dimensions on draw ings ED101 and E-101 to match reference draw ing FLD-4-5.

(4) Updated the Equipment List on draw ing E-702

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-Apr-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9127N-15-R-0012

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Mar-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Apr-2015

CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

333 SW FIRST AVE

PORTLAND OR 97204-3495

W9127N 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127N-15-R-0012

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE / INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

BASIS OF AWARD

This contract will be awarded to one contractor using a best value source selection process outlined in FAR part 15.

The Government will use a tradeoff process to determine award considering price and other factors described below.

The Government may award to other than the lowest-priced or highest-rated offer. This acquisition will be set-aside exclusively for small business in accordance with the procedures outlined in FAR part 19. Similar past requirements have indicated that there are ample local small businesses capable of performing this project. Award of this contract will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government.

BACKGROUND

The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Portland District, seeks a contractor to upgrade the existing water supply piping for the Fall Creek Adult Fish Collection Facility, and incidental related work. The existing facility water supply is a gravity supply from the Fall Creek Dam forebay. The system consists of three steel conduits (small, medium, and large), each conduit with three multilevel intakes known as fish horns, or nine total fish horns.

The different level fish horns are used to adjust the water temperature at the fish facility. Specific project features include:

a. Structural – Refurbish and Replace Existing Fish Horn Components.

b. Mechanical – Replace Valves, Piping, and Hydraulic Power Unit(HPU) System.

c. Electrical and Controls

d. Pipe Inspection

SELECTION PROCESS

This section identifies the minimum requirements of the Offeror’s proposal, and provides guidelines for the preparation of the proposal. Due to the technical requirements and the complexity of the project a “Best Value” acquisition strategy will be used. The solicitation is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside. The Government intends to award a single award, firm-fixed price contract. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will select the most qualified proposal. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is highly rated technically and represents the best value to the government.

Note: The Government intends to make an award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions should discussions prove to be necessary or advantageous to the Government. Because the Government does not intend to hold discussions offerors are encouraged to include their best pricing in their initial proposal.

EVALUATION PROCESS

A. General.

(1) The solicitation is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside. The Government intends to award a single award, firm-fixed price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors and subfactors in the solicitation. Offerors shall submit a technical proposal and a price proposal. The evaluation results of the technical and price proposals will determine an awardee. All evaluation factors other than price are approximately equal in importance to one another. All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are approximately equal to price.

(2) The Government intends to make an award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions should discussions prove to be necessary or advantageous to the Government. Because the Government does not intend to hold discussions offerors are encouraged to include their best pricing in their initial proposal.

(3) In the context of this proposal, “offeror” refers to the proposed prime contractor. A major subcontractor is defined as one who will be providing critical hardware/services (i.e. performing “major features of work” as described under Factor 5 – see below) or whose subcontract is for more than 25% of the total proposed price.

(4) Information submitted about any company other than the offeror, whether an affiliated company, major subcontractor, or other associated business, may not be given much weight unless the proposal contains evidence that the offeror has obtained a written commitment from this other business entity to perform a portion of the work.

(5) All proposals received will stand alone and be considered complete and final. The evaluation board will not consider any information or data incorporated by reference or otherwise referred to. The successful offeror will be selected solely on the basis of the evaluation factors set forth below. Accordingly, proposals submitted in response to this solicitation should provide clear, complete, concise, and straightforward responses to the evaluation factors. Elaborate proposals, color brochures, and other excesses are discouraged.

B. Evaluation Ratings.

All non-price factors other than past performance shall be rated using the combined technical/risk rating as follows:

COLOR RATING DESCRIPTION

Blue

Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Purple

Good

Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Green

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow

Marginal

Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by the strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet the requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unacceptable and unawardable.

Past performance shall be rated using the following ratings:

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

RATING DEFINITION

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude

Relevant of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Performance Confidence Assessments

RATING DESCRIPTION

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

C. Definitions.

Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

Strength. An aspect of an offerors’ proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

4. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS AND EVALUATION

A. Administrative Details and General Instructions: Proposals are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

(1) General Proposal Format. Submit each copy of the proposal in tabbed, 3-ring binders with a “D” ring or locking closures.

Title Page. Each copy must include the Offeror’s name and address, phone number and email address, title of the solicitation, solicitation number and date of submittal clearly identified on the front cover of the binder.

Table of Contents. Each binder of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents. The complete table of contents shall be included in each binder.

Printed Matter Submissions. Pages containing text are expected to be 8 ½ x 11 inches with at least one-inch margins at the top, bottom, and both sides. Paragraphs should be separated by at least one blank line. A standard 11-point font in either Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required.

Organization charts or schedules. A folded 11” x 17” format may be used. Larger format drawings or tables may be added by folding them to fit within the binder.

All information must be confined to the appropriate volume. If the materials do not fit within a single volume, they should be separated in additional binders, but clearly identified as such. Each volume of the proposal is expected to contain a table of contents, summary section with a brief abstract of the volume, and the narrative discussion.

(2) Proposal Content Limitations.

The Offeror must confine the proposal to relevant information and documentation sufficient to provide an adequate basis for evaluation. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details, in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of the proposal. The page count is at the discretion of the offeror, however the proposal may not be more than 50 typewritten pages total. The 50 page limit does NOT include PPQs under Factor 2 The evaluation panel for the Government is instructed to evaluate the non-price proposal factors on the basis of the information provided. Extraneous information provided in the proposals will not be considered in the evaluations; therefore, the offeror should only provide information that satisfies the solicitation requirements. Merely restating the specifications without sufficient elaboration demonstrates a lack of understanding of the requirement.

DO NOT cross reference past performance information. It is acceptable to repeat data, project information or experience in more than one non-price area as long as it satisfies the requirements of the factor.

Proprietary information must be clearly marked.

B. Content of Proposals: All proposals must be prepared in two (2) volumes: A technical proposal (Volume I) and a price proposal (Volume II). Each of the volumes shall be separate and complete in itself so that evaluation of one may be accomplished independently from evaluation of the other. The technical proposal must not contain reference to price. Offerors who fail to submit a complete proposal may be excluded and thus receive no further consideration for award.

(1) Technical Proposal, Volume I: Provide one (1) original and three (3) copies and one (1) pdf. file on a CD-ROM. Volume I shall consist of information for the five (5) factors, and the associated sub-factors, listed in tabular form, as noted below.

VOLUME I – TECHNICAL (NON-PRICE FACTORS)

TAB EVALUATION FACTOR SUBFACTOR

1 Past Experience (Factor 1) 2 Past Performance (Factor 2) 3 Project Management (Factor 3) Prime Contractor Personnel (Sub-factor 1) 4 Project Management (Factor 3) Sub-contractor (Sub-factor 2) 5 Project Management (Factor 3) Safety Record (Sub-factor 3) 6 Schedule (Factor 4) Gantt Chart 7 Schedule (Factor 4) Narrative 8 Detailed Technical Work Plan (Factor 5) Mechanical Equipment 9 Detailed Technical Work Plan (Factor 5) Structural Equipment

10 Detailed Technical Work Plan (Factor 5) Electrical Equipment 11 Detailed Technical Work Plan (Factor 5) Pipe Inspection

Volume I – Technical (Non-Price) Factors and Sub-factors:

Factor 1: Past Experience

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Project Management

Sub-factor 1: Prime contractor personnel.

Sub-factor 2: Sub-contractor personnel.

Sub-factor 3: Safety Record.

Factor 4: Schedule

Gantt Chart Narrative

Factor 5: Detailed Technical Work Plan

Mechanical Equipment Structural Equipment Electrical Equipment Pipe Inspection

Volume I – Technical (Non-Price) Submission Requirements and Evaluation Criteria:

FACTOR 1 – Past Experience Submission Requirements:

The offeror shall provide project information for 3 to 5 projects for the prime, and 2 to 3 projects of each of the proposed major subcontractor(s)*, completed or substantially completed** that are comparable in size, scope, and complexity with the project required by this solicitation.

Project information shall contain:

A description of the project and the contractor’s involvement in the project;

Project location;

Name, address, telephone number and email address of a current representative of the contact customer representative;

Contract awarded amount;

Project start date

Project completion date

* If the offeror will not be having any major subcontractors (as defined above) perform a portion of the work, clearly indicate. An offeror will not be treated unfavorably for failing to utilize a major subcontractor.

** Substantially completed is defined as having completed more than 75% of the project work.

Evaluation Criteria:

More favorable ratings will be assigned to more recent projects, and projects similar in size, scope and complexity to the requirement in this solicitation. Less recent and smaller dollar value projects may be given less weight.

Projects demonstrating that the prime and major subcontractor(s) have a history and are capable of completing the following major features of work will be more highly rated: Designing and manufacturing directional control valves, hydraulic cylinders, HPU’s that use water, or water/propylene glycol mixtures as the working fluid, painting, welding, PLC/HMI based control panel fabrication and testing, and RFEC non-destructive testing for corrosion in pipes.

Note: The Government may consider past experience information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition.

FACTOR 2 – Past Performance Submission Requirements:

The offeror shall provide past performance information for each project listed by the offeror under Factor 1: Past Experience.

If a completed CPARS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, the standard Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for USACE is Form PPQ-0 (9/30/11) and it is provided as Attachment A to the solicitation.

PPQ-0 is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal under Factor 1, Past Experience, and for which a completed CPARS evaluation is not available. (Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.) Do not submit a PPQ when a completed CPARS is available.

Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment A), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow- up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Michael I.

Grasso, via email at Michael.I.Grasso@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. The offeror may submit PPQs retained from previous proposal submissions for other RFPs. For new PPQs, the offerors shall instruct the clients to put the solicitation number in the subject line. The PPQs are Source Selection materials. All successfully submitted PPQs will receive an e-mail confirmation upon receipt. If the offeror does not receive the confirmation, it is their responsibility to follow up to ensure the government has received the information Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the PPIRS, including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s),FAPIIS, Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), telephone interviews with organizations familiar with the offeror’s performance, Government personnel with personal knowledge of the offeror’s performance capability, and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

Evaluation Criteria:

The Government seeks a contractor who maintains a strong commitment to customer satisfaction and superior performance. It is the offeror’s responsibility to affirmatively document these qualities in his technical proposal. In doing so, be mindful that “past performance” and “past experience” are not identical. Past experience measures what you have done and how many times, or for how long, you have done it. Past performance, however, measures how well you have performed.

Past Performance on projects that are similar in size and scope to this project may be considered to be more advantageous to the Government. Thus, the Government will take into consideration the age and relevance of past performance information and the offeror’s overall performance record.

If any performance issues are identified, the Government will consider the number, type and severity of the problems and effectiveness of corrective actions taken.

More favorable ratings may be given to proposal that demonstrate high past performance based on satisfaction of past customers with the offeror’s goods or services, a proven ability to maintain supply/installation schedules, and his record of accomplishing work within budget. The government will evaluate the currency and relevancy of the information, which may help the government assess performance risk.

Past performance questionnaires and/or ratings in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), indicating high levels of customer satisfaction, or completing in advance of original contract schedule, or finding innovative ways to cut costs, or increase value to the customer, will receive a better rating.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Note: The Government may consider past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement.

FACTOR 3 – Project Management For this factor, a highly rated proposal would demonstrate that the offeror’s project team has the expertise, qualifications, and experience to be able to complete the work and complete the work safely.

Sub-factor 1: Prime contractor personnel.

Submission Requirements:

Provide the prime contractor’s organization chart indicating key construction personnel. At a minimum, the chart must include the positions of project manager, project superintendent, contractor quality control (CQC) system manager, and Site Safety and Health Officer(SSHO) that will be assigned to this project. Current resumes for these positions shall be provided. The resumes shall include the duties and responsibilities of the individuals and examples of project experience. Examples of project experience shall include capacity the individual served on each project, dates employed on each project, and monetary size of each project.

Evaluation Criteria:

More favorable evaluations may be given to personnel who have been working in the field longer than those with less experience. Emphasis will be given to personnel with more recent experience and experience similar in size, scope, and complexity to the project called for under this solicitation.

Sub-factor 2: Subcontractor.

Provide current resumes of major subcontractors proposed to complete all work associated with this project. Each resume shall consist of a brief description of the company, services provided for this contract, number of years in business, and number of contracts between the prime contractor and subcontractor.

Evaluation Criteria:

More favorable evaluations may be given to subcontractors who have been in business longer, and have had more past business relationships with the prime contractor.

Sub-factor 3: Safety Record.

Offerors shall include the Prime and major subcontractors' safety record and evidence of their ability to safely conduct construction operations. Information on the prime and major subcontractors' safety record must include the following:

1. Experience Modification Rate (EMR) for Workers’ Compensation Insurance.

Contractors or subcontractors with a rating over 1.0 EMR must provide explanation as to their rating and what steps have been taken to reduce their rating.

2. OSHA Incident Rates – OSHA Form 300

3. Awards or recognition for safety within the last 3 years, if any.

Evaluation Criteria:

Evaluation will be based on the safety record submitted for the prime and major subcontractors.

Offerors with a lower Experience Modification rates (EMRs) will result in a higher evaluation rating. EMRs above 1.0 will result in a lower evaluation rating. Higher evaluation ratings will also be given to offerors that demonstrate continual compliance with OSHA, and have received recognition for safety in the last 3 years.

FACTOR 4 – Schedule Submission Requirements:

Gantt Chart. The offeror shall submit a Gantt chart (MS Project or Primavera software) showing a planned schedule to complete the project. The schedule shall include the fabrication, installation, testing, and commissioning of major features of work. The schedule shall also include mobilization, demobilization, fish facility shutdown periods, reservoir drawdown periods, critical submittals, interim milestones, and contract completion date.

Narrative. The Gantt chart shall be accompanied with a narrative addressing how the offeror will maintain and accomplish the project schedule. Examples of narrative topics include critical path, production rates, weather days, assumptions used (i.e. size of crew, hrs/day, days/wk), anticipated problem areas or delaying factors and their impact, proposed corrective actions and contingency plans to meet project milestones (such as how the offeror will manage work operations when the reservoir raises above fish horn tiers during the contract), and other factors that demonstrate the ability to accomplish the schedule.

Evaluation Criteria:

For the evaluation of all sub-factors, the evaluation will be based on practicality and thoroughness.

A highly rated schedule will demonstrate that the offeror fully understands the required work, contingencies that may arise and how to deal with them, the site constraints, the quality control process related to schedule, and has a realistic plan to complete the work on time.

FACTOR 5 – Technical Work Plan

Provide detailed technical work plans for the major features of work on the project. Examples of topics for each feature of work include access restrictions, crane limitations, ability to perform a significant amount of work in a compressed amount of time, addressing environmental regulations and permits, testing, quality control, commissioning, etc. The Technical Work Plan may also include drawings, cut sheets, examples, or other types of information to communicate the work plan.

The Technical Work Plan must include the following Major Features of Work:

Mechanical Equipment Provide a detailed narrative that addresses the challenges and procedures proposed for the successful completion of the mechanical work for this project. At a minimum, specifically discuss:

a. Mechanical equipment procurement plan (i.e. knife gate valves, pipe fittings and appurtenances, and the hydraulic power unit).

b. The design, manufacture, installation, and testing of hydraulic systems and components (directional control valves, cylinders, hydraulic power units, etc.) that use water, or water/propylene glycol mixtures, as the working fluid., or water/propylene glycol mixtures as the working fluid.

c. The fabrication and installation of the Fish Facility Water Supply Discharge Pipes.

Structural Equipment Provide a detailed narrative that addresses the methods and equipment proposed for the successful completion of the structural work for this project. At a minimum, specifically discuss how the work will be prosecuted including:

a. Type of equipment, equipment setup, transportation methods, and equipment access proposed to perform the work.

b. Describe the process and steps for removal of all structural features to be refurbished or replaced.

c. Describe the method of reinstallation of new and refurbished structural features.

Electrical Equipment Provide a detailed narrative of the challenges and procedures proposed for the electrical work for this project. At a minimum, specifically discuss:

a. Electrical equipment procurement plan ( i.e. PLC/HMI based control panel fabrication and testing).

b. Removal of the existing control system.

c. Installing and testing of the proposed electrical system (i.e. fiber optic cable and

PLC/HMI based control system).

Pipe Inspection Provide a detailed work plan of the challenges and procedures proposed for the remote field eddy current (RFEC) nondestructive testing for corrosion of the buried water supply pipe lines.

Evaluation Criteria:

A highly rated proposal for this factor will demonstrate that the offeror’s project team understands the challenges of the major features of work and has effective solutions to those challenges.

Technical Work Plans will be evaluated on their approaches to demolition, procurement, fabrication, installation, quality control, testing, and commissioning of equipment and materials.

Plans will also be evaluated on their understanding of site challenges, plans and specifications, USACE quality control process, environmental constraints, and safety requirements. A detailed and specific work plan will be rated higher than a vague and general work plan.

(2) Price Proposal, Volume II: The Price Proposal shall be complete, detailed and submitted on forms provided in the Request for Proposal (RFP) (one (1) original and one (1) pdf. file on a CD-ROM).

Contractors shall provide pricing and complete all line items on Standard Form 1442 (SF 1442).

The Price Proposal will be evaluated to determine reasonableness. Price will be evaluated based on the total for all line items, to include option items. Evaluation of price may also include price realism analysis, if such analysis is determined necessary. If determined necessary, price realism will be evaluated on the basis of whether pricing information reflects a clear understanding of the costs and risks associated with the project.

It may also include verification of an offeror’s price, and exchanges with the offeror to determine whether it has an acceptable understanding of the difficulties that may be encountered in performing the contract.

The results of a price realism analysis may impact the evaluation of non-cost factors and the resulting award decision.

Volume II - Price. Your price proposal must be prepared in accordance with below paragraphs and must include:

Tab 1 - SF1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award.

The SF1442 shall be filled out completely by the offeror and signed by an official that is authorized to bind the company. The offeror shall also acknowledge all amendments to the solicitation in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30 or Block 19 of SF1442.

Tab 2 – Section 00010, Proposal Price / Bid Schedule.

The offeror shall fully complete this section.

Tab 3 - Representations, Certifications and other Statements of Offerors.

The offeror shall complete all representations and certifications in Section 00600 and also ensure current registration and completed/updated Annual Representations and Certifications on the System for Award Management (SAM) website, www.sam.gov.

Tab 4 - Bid/Offer Guarantee.

C. Submission of Proposals: Proposals must arrive at the location designated in the RFP for receipt of such proposals prior to the time and date established in Block 13, SF 1442. There will not be a public proposal opening. In order for the proposal to be considered, it MUST be prepared in ENGLISH, and must be submitted as a hardcopy original (Volume I and II) and four (4) copies (Technical Volume I only) with the required electronic CD-ROM:

BY HAND OR COURIER TO:

U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NWP

Block 300 (10th Floor USACE Security Desk) 333 SW. First Avenue Portland, Oregon Attention: Michael I. Grasso – CECT-NWP-C

OR SURFACE MAIL ADDRESS:

U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NWP

P. O. Box 2946 Portland, OR 97208-2946 Attention: Michael I. Grasso – CECT-NWP-C

NOTE: E-MAIL SUBMISSIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. If the electronic CD-ROM proposal differs from the hard copy, the hard copy will take precedence.

OFFEROR SHALL MARK THE OUTSIDE ENVELOPE(S) (PURSUANT TO FAR 14.201-5) AS

FOLLOWS:

Envelope(s) shall be plainly marked with the following information:

Solicitation No. W9127N-15-R-0012 Opening Date: _______________________________________________________ Number of each amendment that has been received: _________________________

ATTACHMENT A

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. The USACE Form PPQ shall be utilized for all evaluations that require a Past Performance Questionnaire.

2. Solicitations:

“Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT

SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS

EVALUATION, the PPQ included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2, Recent of Current Past Performance.

AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment A), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow- up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Michael I. Grasso, via email at Michael.I.Grasso@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.”

USACE Form PPQ will be made accessible on FBO website as a separate attachment.

(End of Summary of Changes)

C

C F

D

D

A

A

H E

E

GG

H

A

A

B

B

M I

N

N

=1'-8"

4SP.@ 5"

N

3" MIN. 3" MIN.

" 3" 3" =2'-1"

5SP. @ 5"

N

N

5"

1'-2•"

3'-6"

2'-6"

5"5"

6"

8•" 8•"=2'-1"

5SP. @ 5"

S

P

2'-11" 5" 6"

4"

4"

7¦

. 3" MIN. 3" MIN.

N

5"

5"

3" MIN.

/0

A P

T

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

X

X

A C

A

C

A C

A

P

S T

U B

X

X

A C

A

C

A C

A

P

HH10

HH7

HH6

HH5

HH4

HH3

HH2

HH1

U7 T1

STUB STUB STUB X1 AP23 STUB

STUB STUB STUB X1 AP23 STUB

STUB STUB STUB X1 AP23 STUB

STUB STUB STUB X1 AP23 STUB

STUB STUB STUB STUB X2 AP2

STUB

HH1

HH2

HH3

HH4

HH5

HH6

HH7

HH8

HH10

X2

STUB AP2STUB STUB STUB STUB

STUB

STUB AP2STUB STUB STUB X2

STUB STUBSTUB STUB X1 AP23

STUB STUBSTUB STUB X1 AP23

STUB STUBSTUB STUB X1 AP23

STUB STUBSTUB STUB X1 AP23

AP3 X4AC1 AC2 AC3 X3

STUB

U7 T1 H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

S T

U B

A P

X

S T

U B

X

A P

S T

U B

S T

U B

A P

X

S T

U B

S T

U B

S T

U B

A C

A

C

A C

X

A P

X

T

THIS ROW FOR HH8 ONLY

U13 (HH7 ONLY)

HH7 ONLY

FINISHED GRADE

GROUND ROD

1" DIAM. COPPER WELD

BROZE CABLE CLAMP

TOP OF DAM

#2/0 BARE

GRAVEL COVER

X

GRAVEL COVER

GROUND LINE, EL. 841.0X

SELECTED BACKFILL

T

SELECTED BACKFILL

EL. 664.0

GROUND LINE,

X

X

A P

EL. 675.0

GROUND LINE,

BACKFILL

SELECTED

#2/0 BARE

U -2

T -2

EL. 675.08

EL. 674.29

UPPER CONDUIT

EL.662.2

HH8

EL.664.6

EL.661.68

LINE

GROUND

E L .7

E L .6

S T

A

R O

R O

.7

EL. 665

EL. 664

EL. 662.83

U/S FISH FACILITIES

UPPER CONDUIT

R O

STA.

3+

GROUNDING JUMPER

O.Z. TYPE EX OR EQUAL, WITH

CONDUIT EXPANSION FITTINGS,

GROUNDING JUMPER

O.Z. TYPE AX OR EQUAL, WITH

CONDUIT EXPANSION FITTINGS,GROUNDING JUMPER

O.Z. TYPE AX OR EQUAL, WITH

CONDUIT EXPANSION FITTINGS,

A X

IS

O

F D

A M

HH2

EL. 675.0

GROUND LINE COVER

ALUMINUM MANHOLE

GRD. BUS

#2/0 TO

IRONS

PULLING

BRASS PLUGS

"STUBS" CLOSED WITH

FLUSH COUPLING

2" NIPPLE

DRAIN AND SUMP

COVER

GRAVEL #6

#6

NOTE 3

#2/0 BARE

/0

A P

BLOCK

CONCRETE

ROCK LINE

SEE DWG. FLD-4-15

DOWNSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY,

SEE DWG FLD-4-12

REGULATING GATE STRUCTURE,

AT FIRST SUPPORT

CONDUITS X1 AND X2

TERMINATE AND CAP

SEE DWG. FLD-4-18

SPILLWAY

D U

C T B

A N

K

/0

W

IT

H

R .O S

T A

S T

A

S T

A

G R R

O D "X

/0

G R R

O D "X

/0

S T

A

"X

G R R

O D

"S

C E

N T E

R

D

IS

T R

S T

A

A X

IS

O

F D

A M

HH2

HH3

HH4

HH5

HH6

G R R

O D "X

TO POWER POLE

GROUND, AT METER ON POLE

TERMINATED 6 FT. ABOVE

21 FT. ABOVE GROUND AP1

U7 & T1 TERMINATED ON POLE

POLE, LANE COUNTY COOP.

#2/0

GROUND ROD, 1"X10'

GROUND ROD, 1"X10'

#2/0, RUN IN CONDUIT HC1

SEE DWG. FLD-4-16

UPSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY.

HH9, SEE DWG. FLD-4-16

SEE DWG, FLD-4-10

ADIT BUILDING

HH10

HH7

#2/0

F

HH7

3" MIN.

H H

F

IR

S T S

U P P

O R

T

/0

G R

O U

N D T

O

12 SP. @

12'-0"=144'-0"

CONDUIT SUPPORTS

13 SP. @

12'-0"=156'-0"

CONDUIT SUPPORTS

A P

/0

/0

SELECTED BACKFILL

BUSHINGS

GRDG.

ROD

GROUND

12'-0"

EL. 841.0

TOP OF DAM

F

O R H

H

EACH 12/c #19/25

A P

/0 B

A R

E

#2/0 BARE

A C

/c

/2

A C

/c

/2

A C

/c

/2

CONNECTED TO UTILITY GROUND

COPPER CABLE,

#2/0 BARE

"4

" (HH8 ONLY)4

3U13, "2

1AP1-2

"2

1AP1-2

/0

A P -2

12-HOLES

" DIA.,16

" (HH8 ONLY)4

3U13, " (HH7 ONLY)4

3U13, GALV. AFTER FABRICATION

"X3'-3" LONG4

1L3"X3"X

U BOLT

" GALV.8

DRILLING DETAIL BELOW

LONG, GALV, SEE

" x 2'-9"2 1" x 12

1L2

", 2/c #184 3U13, "2 12'-1

15'-0"

12'-0"

12'-0"

3'-6"

6"

M

IN

1'-0"1'-0"

3'-3"

1'-0"5"5"5"5"7"

6" 6"

4'-0"

"4

2-5/8"

2-5/8"

2'-9"

3'-6"

8•"5 SP. @ 5"= 2'-1"8•"

NOTE 3

EACH 12/c #19/25

H C

H C

H C

H C

H C

H C

H

C

H C

H

C

H C

H C

H

C

H C

H

C

H C

HC5 HC4 HC3 HC2

HC5 HC4 HC3 HC2

HC1 HC2 HC3 HC4 HC5

H C

H C

H C

H C

H C

H C

H C

H C

H C

H C

19/25

GRAPHIC SCALES

12"

12"

12" 6" 0 1'

0 40'

2'1'06"

4'3'2'1'0

40'

SCALE: 1 INCH = 1 FOOT

SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 FOOT

HC1

HC1

H C

H

C

H C

H

C

H C

H C

H

C

H C

H

C

H C

HC5 HC4 HC3 HC2 HC1

NOTE 3

NOTE 3

NOTE 3

SEE SHEET ED402 & ED602

UPSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY. INCH = 1 FOOT2

1SCALE:

INCH = 1 FOOT4

3SCALE:

SEE SHEET ED401 & ED603

DOWNSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY,

DRAWING PLOT SIZE: ANSI F

D

C

A

B

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D W

N B

Y

C K

D B

Y

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D A

T E

F

IL

E N

U M

B E

R

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

P L

O T S

C A

L E

P L

O T D

A T

E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

IDENTIFICATION

SHEET

1 2 3 4 5 6

E

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N M

A R

K D

A T

E A

P P

R of Engineers

US Army Corps

/1

/2

BORDER VERSION UPDATE [08-2013]

ED101SHEET NAME:G2ecdder Douglas RichardsBY USERNAME:DATE AND TIME PLOTTED: 4/10/2015 10:46:46 AM

SECTION F-F

SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"

SECTION A-A

SECTION B-B

BRACKET DRILLING DETAIL

PLAN

SCALE: 1"=1'-0"

SECTION D-D SECTION E-E

PLOT PLAN

SCALE: 1"=40'-0"

TYPICAL FOR HH1-HH6, INCLUSIVE, SIMILAR FOR HH7 & HH8

HANDHOLE DETAIL

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

TYPICAL GROUND ROD INSTALLATION

SCALE: 1"=1'-0"

SECTION C-C

HANDHOLE DEVELOPMENT

SECTION G-G

"=1'-0"2

1SCALE:

SECTION H-H

NO SCALE

" = 1'-0"4

3SCALE:

" = 1'-0"4

3SCALE:

"=1'-0"2

1SCALE:

"=1'-0"2

1SCALE:

"=1'-0"2

1SCALE:

"=1'-0"2

1SCALE:

NOTES:

FLD-4-5 PLOT PLAN AND GROUNDING

W A

T E

R S

U P

P L

Y U

P G

R A

D E

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

P O

R T

L A

N D

O R

E G

O N

P O

R T

L A

N D D

IS

T R

IC

T

A

S I F

/2

/2

F L F .1

E

D

X X

X .d g n

G E

C D

T R

S

G E

C D

P W

L

O T P

L A

N A

N D G

R O

U N

D

IN

G

ED101

:1

U L T F

IS

H F

A C

IL

IT

Y

F

L L C

R E

E K D

A M A

N D R

E S

E R

V O

IR

REFERENCE DRAWING:

G E

C D

D E

R

W

IL

L

IA

M F

O R

T U

N Y P .E

N -1

-R -0

4. ELEVATIONS BASED ON NGVD29. SEE C-001 FOR NAVD88 CONVERSION.

FACILITY AND THE UPSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY.

3. REMOVE CABLES "HC1-HC5" BETWEEN THE DOWNSTREAM MIGRANT

2. ALL EXISTING CONDUITS 2" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

1. GREEN OR HEAVY LINES INDICATE EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED.

G E

C D

D E

R U

P D

A T

E D D

IM

E N

S

IO

N S T

O M

A T

C H R

E F

E R

E N

C E D

R A

W

IN

G F

L D -4 -5

/1

/1

A

PORTLAND DISTRICT

B

B

D

C

C F

A

A

D

F

H E

E

H

G G

SECTION C-C

"=1'-0"2

1SCALE:

N

3" =2'-1"

5SP. @ 5"

3"

N

N

5"

=1'-8"

4SP.@ 5"

1'-2•"

3'-6"

2'-6"

5"5"

6"

8•" 8•"=2'-1"

5SP. @ 5"

S

7¦

N

3" MIN. 3" MIN.

. 3" MIN. 3" MIN.

N

5"

5"

2'-11" 5" 6"

4"

4"

3" MIN.

/0

A P

T

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

X

X

A C

A

C

A C

A

P

S T

U B

X

X

A C

A

C

A C

A

P

HH10

HH7

HH6

HH5

HH4

HH3

HH2

HH1

U7 T1

STUB STUB STUB X1 AP23 STUB

STUB STUB STUB X1 AP23 STUB

STUB STUB STUB X1 AP23 STUB

STUB STUB STUB X1 AP23 STUB

STUB STUB STUB STUB X2 AP2

STUB

HH1

HH2

HH3

HH4

HH5

HH6

HH7

HH8

HH10

X2

STUB AP2STUB STUB STUB STUB

STUB

STUB AP2STUB STUB STUB X2

STUB STUBSTUB STUB X1 AP23

STUB STUBSTUB STUB X1 AP23

STUB STUBSTUB STUB X1 AP23

STUB STUBSTUB STUB X1 AP23

AP3 X4AC1 AC2 AC3 X3

STUB

U7 T1 H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

H H

S T

U B

A P

X

S T

U B

X

A P

S T

U B

S T

U B

A P

X

S T

U B

S T

U B

S T

U B

A C

A

C

A C

X

A P

X

T

THIS ROW FOR HH8 ONLY

U13 (HH7 ONLY)

HH7 ONLY

FINISHED GRADE

GROUND ROD

1" DIAM. COPPER WELD

BROZE CABLE CLAMP

TOP OF DAM

#2/0 BARE

GRAVEL COVER

X

GRAVEL COVER

GROUND LINE, EL. 841.0X

SELECTED BACKFILL

T

SELECTED BACKFILL

EL. 664.0

GROUND LINE,

X

X

A P

EL. 675.0

GROUND LINE,

BACKFILL

SELECTED

#2/0 BARE

U -2

T -2

EL. 675.08

EL. 674.29

UPPER CONDUIT

EL.662.2

HH8

EL.664.6

EL.661.68

LINE

GROUND

E L .7

E L .6

S T

A

R O

R O

.7

EL. 665

EL. 664

EL. 662.83

U/S FISH FACILITIES

UPPER CONDUIT

R O

STA.

3+

GROUNDING JUMPER

O.Z. TYPE EX OR EQUAL, WITH

CONDUIT EXPANSION FITTINGS,

GROUNDING JUMPER

O.Z. TYPE AX OR EQUAL, WITH

CONDUIT EXPANSION FITTINGS,GROUNDING JUMPER

O.Z. TYPE AX OR EQUAL, WITH

CONDUIT EXPANSION FITTINGS,

A X

IS

O

F D

A M

HH2

EL. 675.0

GROUND LINE COVER

ALUMINUM MANHOLE

GRD. BUS

#2/0 TO

IRONS

PULLING

BRASS PLUGS

"STUBS" CLOSED WITH

FLUSH COUPLING

2" NIPPLE

DRAIN AND SUMP

COVER

GRAVEL #6

#6

NOTE 3

#2/0 BARE

/0

A P

BLOCK

CONCRETE

ROCK LINE

SEE DWG. FLD-4-15

DOWNSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY,

SEE DWG FLD-4-12

REGULATING GATE STRUCTURE,

AT FIRST SUPPORT

CONDUITS X1 AND X2

TERMINATE AND CAP

SEE DWG. FLD-4-18

SPILLWAY

D U

C T B

A N

K

/0

W

IT

H

R .O S

T A

S T

A

S T

A

G R R

O D "X

/0

G R R

O D "X

/0

S T

A

"X

G R R

O D

"S

C E

N T E

R

D

IS

T R

S T

A

A X

IS

O

F D

A M

HH2

HH3

HH4

HH5

HH6

G R R

O D "X

TO POWER POLE

GROUND, AT METER ON POLE

TERMINATED 6 FT. ABOVE

21 FT. ABOVE GROUND AP1

U7 & T1 TERMINATED ON POLE

POLE, LANE COUNTY COOP.

#2/0

GROUND ROD, 1"X10'

GROUND ROD, 1"X10'

#2/0, RUN IN CONDUIT HC1

SEE DWG. FLD-4-16

UPSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY.

HH9, SEE DWG. FLD-4-16

SEE DWG, FLD-4-10

ADIT BUILDING

HH10

HH7

#2/0

HH7

3" MIN.

H H

F

IR

S T S

U P P

O R

T

/0

G R

O U

N D T

O

12 SP. @

12'-0"=144'-0"

CONDUIT SUPPORTS

13 SP. @

12'-0"=156'-0"

CONDUIT SUPPORTS

A P

/0

/0

SELECTED BACKFILL

BUSHINGS

GRDG.

ROD

GROUND

12'-0"

EL. 841.0

TOP OF DAM

12'-0"

F

O R H

H

EACH 12/c #19/25

A P

/0 B

A R

E

#2/0 BARE

A C

/c

/2

A C

/c

/2

A C

/c

/2

COPPER CABLE,

#2/0 BARE

CONNECTED TO UTILITY GROUND

"4

"4

" (HH8 ONLY)4

3U13, "2

1AP1-2

"2

1AP1-2

/0

A P -2

12-HOLES

" DIA.,16

" (HH8 ONLY)4

3U13, " (HH7 ONLY)4

3U13, GALV. AFTER FABRICATION

"X3'-3" LONG4

1L3"X3"X

DRILLING DETAIL BELOW

LONG, GALV, SEE

" x 2'-9"2 1" x 12

1L2

", 2/c #184 3U13, "2 12'-1

3'-6"

8•"5 SP. @ 5"=2'-1"8•"

2†"

2†"

2'-9"

4'-0"

6" 6"

1'-0"5"5"5"5"7"

3'-3"

U BOLT

" GALV.8

6"

1'-0"1'-0"

IN

15'-0"

12'-0"

3'-6"

NOTE 4

GRAPHIC SCALES

12"

12"

12" 6" 0 1'

2'1'06"

4'3'2'1'0

SCALE: 1 INCH = 1 FOOT

SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 FOOT

0 40'40'

INCH = 1 FOOT2

1SCALE:

INCH = 1 FOOT4

3SCALE:

SP5 SP4 SP3 SP2

SP5 SP4 SP3 SP2

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

SP5 SP4 SP3 SP2

NOTE 3

NOTE 3

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

SP2 SP3 SP4 SP5

J1

J2

J3

TT

TT

TT

NOTE 3

SEE SHEET E-401

DOWNSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY,

250 350

200 300100

SEE 701

NOTE 3

SEE SHEET E-402 & E-602

CONTROL HOUSE

UPSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY.

C1

ZS0

B1

ZSO

A1

ZSO

C1

ZSC

B1

ZSC

A1

ZSC

A2

ZSO

B2

ZSO

C2

ZSO

C2

ZSC

B2

ZSC

A2

ZSC

A3

ZSO

B3

ZSO

C3

ZSO

A3

ZSC

B3

ZSC

C3

ZSC

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

S P

DRAWING PLOT SIZE: ANSI F

D

C

A

B

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D W

N B

Y

C K

D B

Y

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D A

T E

F

IL

E N

U M

B E

R

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

P L

O T S

C A

L E

P L

O T D

A T

E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

IDENTIFICATION

SHEET

1 2 3 4 5 6

E

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N M

A R

K D

A T

E A

P P

R of Engineers

US Army Corps

/1

/2

BORDER VERSION UPDATE [08-2013]

E-101SHEET NAME:G2ecdder Douglas RichardsBY USERNAME:DATE AND TIME PLOTTED: 4/10/2015 10:46:57 AM

SECTION F-F

SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"

SECTION B-B

SECTION A-A

BRACKET DRILLING DETAIL

PLAN

SCALE: 1"=1'-0"

HANDHOLE DETAIL

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

TYPICAL FOR HH1-HH6, INCLUSIVE, SIMILAR FOR HH7 & HH8

SECTION D-D

"=1'-0"2

1SCALE:

SCALE: 1"=40'-0"

PLOT PLAN

NO SCALE

SECTION H-H

SECTION E-E SECTION G-G

HANDHOLE DEVELOPMENT

"=1'-0"2

1SCALE:

TYPICAL GROUND ROD INSTALLATION

SCALE: 1"=1'-0"

" = 1'-0"4

3SCALE:

" = 1'-0"4

3SCALE:

"=1'-0"2

1SCALE: "=1'-0"2

1SCALE:

FLD-4-5 PLOT PLAN AND GROUNDING

W A

T E

R S

U P

P L

Y U

P G

R A

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

P O

R T

L A

N D

O R

E G

O N

P O

R T

L A

N D D

IS

T R

S I F

/2

/2

F L F .1

E -1

X X

X .d g n

G E

C D

T R

S

G E

C D

P

O T P

L A

N A

N D G

R O

U N

D

IN

G

E-101

U L T F

IS

H F

A C

IL

IT

Y

E -1

F A

L L C

R E

E K D

A M A

N D R

E S

E R

V O

IRREFERENCE DRAWING:

NOTES:

G E

C D

D E

R

W

IL

L

IA

M F

O R

T U

N Y P .E

N -1

-R -0

6. ELEVATIONS BASED ON NGVD29. SEE C-001 FOR NAVD88 CONVERSION.

IN WATER. SEE E-603 AND SPECIFICATIONS.

5. JUNCTION BOXES J1 - J3 SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR CONTINUOUS SUBMERSION

DO NOT USE EXISTING PIPE AS SUPPORT. LABEL EACH CABLE PER SPECS.

AS NECESSARY USING 175LB CABLE TIES OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD.

4. INSTALL CABLES WITHIN EXISTING PIPE TRENCH. BUNDLE & SUPPORT

SPARE (SP) IS A PULL CORD IN PLACE OF REMOVED CABLE.

MIGRANT FACILITY. SEE E-701 FOR CIRCUIT ID & BLOCK DIAGRAM.

DOWNSTREAM MIGRANT FACILITY TO ADIT BUILDING AND UPSTREAM

3. INSTALL NEW FIBER OPTIC CABLE WITHIN EXISTING DUCT FROM

2. EXISTING DUCTBANK CONDUITS 2" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

1. RED OR HEAVY LINES INDICATE EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED.

G E

C D

D E

R U

P D

A T

E D D

IM

E N

S

IO

N S T

O M

A T

C H R

E F

E R

E N

C E D

R A

W

IN

G F

L D -4 -5

/1

/1

A

12" 9" 6" 3" 0 1'

SCALE: 1•"= 1'-0"

POWER SCHEMATIC

B

A

DETAIL

SEE

B

DETAIL

SEE

POWER

ITEM QUAN UNIT DESCRIPTION

EQUIPMENT LIST (PRIMARY ITEMS SHOWN)

C

DETAIL

SEE

CR01 THROUGH CR32

S P

A C

E

I B

I F

E N

B T

14131211100908

LIGHT 03

01 02

SUGGESTED LAYOUT

120VAC SUPPLY TERMINALS

EXTERNAL TO HPU CABINET & DEVICES

2 LEVEL / 2 CIRCUIT TERMINALS 2 LEVEL / 2 CIRCUIT TERMINALS

TO SOLENOID VALVES & HPU SUPPLY

A

E

24VDC SUPPLY TERMINALS

120VAC MODULE TERMINALS

C 24VDC MODULE TERMINALS

O B

I A I

DETAIL

SEE

D

DETAIL

SEE E

D

28 4141

292929 29

29 29 2929

42424242 42 42 40 40

NP3

F -D

C

F -D

C

F -D

C

F -D

C

F -D

C

F -D

C

F -D

C

D C -C

O M

D C -C

O M

G R

O U

N D

G R

O U

N D

C B -0

F -L

F -L

F -L

F -L

F -L

F -L

2525252525252427 26 26 26 26 26

NP1 NP2

120VAC DEVICES

" TEXT8

" TEXT8

" TEXT8

" TEXT8

" TEXT8

X 2"2

X 2"2

X 2"2

X 2"2

X 2"2

NP1

NP2

NP3

NP4

PLATE

NAME

(AS REQ'D)

DIMENSION

SIZE

FONT

ENGRAVED DESCRIPTION

NAMEPLATE SCHEDULE

27 38 38 38 38 38383838383838 383838 38

INTERNAL WIRING TO IA16I MODULE

NP4

G R

O U

N D

A -0

/N

A -0

/N

A -0

/N

A -0

/N

A -0

/N

A -0

/N

A -0

/N

A -0

/N

A -0

/N

A -0

/N

A -1

/N

A -1

/N

A -1

/N

A -1

/N

A -1

/N

A -1

/N

H P

U -P

M

H P

U -N

00 01 02

H P

U -N

H P

U -N

03 04 05 06 07

G R

O U

N D

09 11 13 15 17 19 21 29272523 3508 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 34

NP5

B -0

B -0

B -0

B -0

B -0

B -0

B -0

B -0

B -0

B -0

B -1

B -1

B -1

B -1

B -1

B -1

B -1

B -1

B -1

B -1

B -2

B -2

B -2

B -2

B -2

B -2

B -2

B -2

B -2

B -2

B -3

B -3

INTERNAL WIRING TO IB32 MODULE

NP6

VALVE LIMIT SWITCHES

EXTERNAL TO FISH HORN

120VAC INPUT FROM HPU

" TEXT8

X 2"2

1 NP5 120VAC OUTPUT TO HPU/VALVES

NP6

FISH VALVE PLC CABINET

34 35

OUTPUT RELAY TERMINALS

P S

S S

S S

N

L N

G

OUTLET

100 WATT

CB01-15A

W/THERMOSTAT

CABINET HEATER

SWITCH

ETHERNET

+24VDC COM

PS-1

DOOR SWITCH LIGHT

24" FLUORESCENT LIGHT

RECEPTACLE

DUPLEX

L1

L2

L3

L5

L

F4-DC

F5-DC

F1-L

F2-L

F3-L

F4-L

F5-L

DC3

DC4

PNL HL CKT3

120VAC SUPPLY

SEE E-703

INTERFACE MODULE

FUSED ANALOG

S

120VAC/24VDC@20A

DC UPS POWER MODULE

DC5

DC6

#1756-PB72

120VAC/5VDC

TERMINAL

GRAPHIC

RD

BK

LOAD

INPUT

F6-DC

DC7

S

RD

BK 25A CKT BREAKER

WITH INTEGRAL

EXTERNAL BATTERY

ISOLATED PWR SUPPLY

ANALOG TRANSMITTER

(RSVD FUTURE)

SPARE CKT

F7-DC

1756-IB32

MODULE

DC INPUT

1756-OB32

MODULE

DC OUTPUT

CONVERTER

DC/DC

#10AWG #10AWG

PS-2

D C -C

O M

F8-DC

DC-COM

(#12AWG)

UPS-DC

(3/4"C FLEX, 2#10AWG, 1#12EGC)

MFR POLARIZED CABLE W/CONNECTORS

S S

LINE NEUTRAL EGC

DISCONNECT

MAIN CABINET AC

#10AWG

F1-DC

F2-DC

F3-DC

F9-DC

DC2

F6-L

N E

U T

R A

L

N E

U T

R A

L

N E

U T

R A

L

N E

U T

R A

L

N E

U T

R A

L

BLOCK (TYP)

TERMINAL

NEUTRAL

42 42 42

F -D

C

F -D

C

F -D

C

SP

SP

2 LEVEL / 2 CKT TERMINALS

(TYP)

24VDC INPUTS

MAIN AC DISCONNECT

24VDC UPS DISCONNECT

PS1

UPS

D C -C

O M

31 32 33

CABINET WIRING TO RELAY CONTACTS

CIRCUIT PROTECTOR

UL 98 CLASS CC

MAIN DC DISCONNECT

MAIN CABINET

ADJACENT TO

WALL MOUNT

NEMA 1 ENCLOSURE

COM

PS2-

POS

PS2-

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

A1 A2

12 22

14 24

11 21

C P

U

S P

A C

E

S P

A C

E

S P

A C

E

ALLEN BRADLEY #1492-WFB4-24 FINGER SAFE FUSE BLOCK, LED INDICATOR

ALLEN BRADLEY #1492--PPSL3 PARTITION PLATE

ALLEN BRADLEY #1492-JD4C FEED THROUGH 30A TERMINAL BLOCKS, 4 POINTS

ALLEN BRADLEY #1492-JD3-B 2-LEVEL, 2CKT FEED THROUGH TERMINAL BLOCK, BLUE

ALLEN BRADLEY #1492-JD3-RE 2-LEVEL, 2CKT FEED THROUGH TERMINAL BLOCK, RED

ALLEN BRADLEY #1492-JD3…