Attachment 2 St. Stephens Pre-proposal Conference Slides.pptx

PPTX presentation 575 KB Posted

Attached to
St. Stephens Switchgear Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9127825R0021
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Mobile

About this file

This is a pre-proposal conference presentation for solicitation W9127825R0021 regarding switchgear installation at St. Stephens, South Carolina, conducted by the USACE Mobile District. The project involves installing 13.8kV generator switchgear, 480V station service switchgear, and two station service transformers, along with modifying units 1-3 generator non-segregated phase bus.

The solicitation is a 100% small business set-aside under NAICS 335313 with a size standard of 1,250 employees. It will be a firm-fixed-price contract with 15-month duration from award. Proposals are due December 30, 2024 at 2:00 PM Central Time via PIEE, requiring three volumes: Past Performance/Technical Approach (Volume I), Cost Proposal (Volume II), and Administrative Requirements (Volume III). Past performance must include up to 5 relevant projects completed within 10 years. Questions are due by December 19, 2024, at 5:00 PM Central Time through ProjNet. The evaluation will prioritize technical factors over price, using a best value trade-off approach.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Pre-Proposal Conference Switchgear Installation, St. Stephens, South Carolina

Solicitation W9127825R0021

PeKita Taliaferro-Littles Contract Officer Richard Bonnell Contract Specialist USACE Mobile District 11 December 2024

Trusted Partners Delivering Value Today for a Better Tomorrow

US Army Corps of Engineers

BUILDING STRONG®

Disclaimer This pre-proposal conference is for informational purposes only.

Any remarks or explanations given during this conference (or in the conference notes) will not change the terms and conditions of the solicitation. Offerors are cautioned to carefully read the requirements of the solicitation and comply accordingly. Oral exchanges between offerors and the Government will not be binding unless changes are incorporated by a written amendment.

BUILDING STRONG

Trusted Partners Delivering Value Today for a Better Tomorrow

Topics

General Information.

What offerors should submit?

How will offerors proposals be evaluated?

What if you have questions?

Proposal due dates.

General Information Check https://sam.gov/ for solicitation & amendments.

100% Small Business set-aside NAICS Code 335313 “Switchgear & Switchboard Apparatus Manufacturing”.

Small Business Size Std: No. of Employees 1250.

Firm-Fixed Price Contract.

Contract Duration 15 months from Contract Award.

What do offerors need to submit?

Instructions to Bidders (Attachment 6 - AM 01).

Complete proposal includes 3 Volumes are required:

Vol I - Past Performance and Technical Approach

ABSOLUTELY NO COST INFO HERE

Vol II – Cost Proposal Vol III - Administrative Requirements 6 files (4 PDF files and 2 Excel files) Proposal Validity should be 90 days

What do offerors need to submit in Volume I, Factor 1, Tab A: Past Performance of Prime Relevant Company Effort Is the effort recent?

Contract is 100% complete within 10 years of the RFP issue date (2 December 2024);or Contract is ongoing and at least one year of the contract is 100% complete by the RFP issue date.

How is Offeror’s effort relevant to this RFP?

Describe how your project is similar to the scope, magnitude, and complexity to the solicitation.

Quality of Past Performance

CPARS

If no CPARS, then Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Solicitation Attachment 2 -Evaluation Criteria-Attachment 2) Can provide a copy of a previously obtained PPQ from your customer

What do offerors need to submit in Volume I, Factor 1, Tab A: Past Performance of Prime …continue from previous slide.

Submit no more than 5 examples (Attachment 2, Evaluation Criteria Section 2.1.1(a)

Evaluation Criteria Section 2.1.1(b) will be amended.

What do offerors need to submit in Volume I: Factor 2,Tab B: Technical Approach for Work

Submit your company’s technical approach to managing and executing the installation, testing, and commissioning of the 15kV switchgear at the St. Stephens plant.

Be sure to address subcontracting efforts (if applicable).

What do offerors need to submit in Volume I: Factor 3 Tab C, Technical Approach for Schedule Submit a schedule outline of the projected work as defined in Solicitation Attachment 3 “Switchgear Specifications” Be sure to identify major milestones and dates.

Ensure that the schedule demonstrates the Offerors understanding of special circuit outage scheduling and phasing requirements as required in Attachment

Volume II Cost/Price Proposal

Submit electronic copy of Excel Workbook in Excel format (read-only) Use most recent version available Do not change or modify worksheets

Insert a price on all numbered items of the Bid Schedule, unless otherwise noted in the Specifications.

Volume III Administrative Requirements Signed and dated SF1449 Acknowledge any and all Amendments Completed Proposal Data Sheet (Instructions to Bidders, Attachment 1) Representations & Certifications (Complete FAR clause 52.212-3 or a copy from Sam.gov Joint Venture documents, if applicable Financial Statements Bank Reference Notice of Exceptions

How will I be evaluated?

Solicitation Attachment 2 Evaluation Criteria details four parts process:

Proposal compliance review Volume I Technical proposal evaluations Volume II – Cost/price analysis Technical-price trade-off analysis

Evaluation of Volume 1 Volume 1Past Performance:

Looks at Recent, Relevant and Quality Each project example is assigned a relevancy rating Performance Confidence Assessment Rating All project examples are combined for an overall rating Ratings: Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Neutral Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence

…continue Evaluation of Volume 1

Technical Approach:

Will be conducted without the knowledge of price Looks at Strengths, Weaknesses, Significant Weaknesses and Deficiencies of the technical approach Combined Technical/Risk Rating to reflect the degree to which the proposal meet or does not meet minimum capabilities Consists of evaluation and adjectival ratings of all source selection factors: Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable A proposal with a deficiency will preclude award action to an offeror

…continue Evaluation of Volume 1

Volume I is more important than Volume II

Order of relative importance

Evaluation of Volume 2 Price is not rated.

Proposal analysis be performed IAW FAR 15.404-1.

Price analysis will be IAW FAR 15.404-1(b).

Pricing evaluator will check for unbalanced pricing.

The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest price offer The evaluation factors (Volume I), other than cost or price, are more important than price (Volume II).

Performance / Technical Tradeoff Upon completion of its evaluations, the SSEB will then assess price in connection with the technical evaluation to determine the proposal offering the most advantage to the Government.

What if I have a question?

Refer to AM 01: SF30 and Attachment 6,” Instructions to bidder” Submit via https://www.ProjNet.org/projnet Deadline 19 December 2024, 1700 Central Time

Proposal Due Date Submit via PIEE Site at https://piee.eb.mil Due NLT:

30 December 2024 1400 (2:00pm Central Time)

Refer to the Summary of Changes in the Solicitation SF 1449 and the Instructions to Bidders in SF 30 AM01.

QUESTIONS?

image9.png image1.jpeg image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.jpeg image7.png image8.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .