W9127821R0051 AM04.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127821R0051
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
1 2
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
W9127821R0051-0004 12 JULY 2021 MHF20005
6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY(If other than item 6)
CODE
Corps of Engineers 109 St. Joseph St.
Mobile, AL 36602
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION
NO.
W9127821R0051
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
9 JUNE 2021
10A. MODIFICATION OF
CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
CODE
FACILITY CODE
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority)
THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible)
The subject solicitation for: AIRMAN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FACILITY, EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
Is modified in the following: REFER TO THE ENCLOSED REVISED SPECIFICATIONS FOR AMENDMENT NO. 0004
NOTE: THE RECEIPT OF PROPOSAL DATE IS HEREBY REVISED BY THIS AMENDMENT. REFER TO BLOCK 13.A OF THE ENCLOSED SF1442.
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document reference in item 9A or 10A, as Heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICE (Type or print)
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BY
(Signature of contracting officer)
16C. DATE SIGNED
NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)
PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA
AIRMAN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FACILITY W9127821R0051
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA MHF20005
SF 30 Page 2 W9127821R0051-0004
PART I - REVISIONS MADE BY ADDED AND/OR REPLACEMENT PARAGRAPHS/PAGES/SECTIONS
The items listed below are to be replaced by the corresponding added and/or revised paragraphs/pages or sections. Added and/or revised paragraphs/pages or sections are indicated by a note in bottom right hand corner of each paragraph or page. Added sections are hereby made a part of the contract and are to be inserted in the specification in the proper numerical/alphabetical sequence.
Within the specifications, deletions from the specifications are indicated by strikethrough, e.g.: deletions are marked with strikethrough and additions to the specifications including revisions/substitutions are indicated in bold, italic and underlined, e.g.: additions are indicated thus.
Corresponding Added or Revised Paragraph SECTION Page, and/or Section
SF1442 Revised Block 13.A as indicated herein.
00 12 00 Revised Paragraph 3.3 and Attachment 3 as indicated herein.
Encl as stated Revised pages of the specifications as indicated in Part I.
SOLICITATION, OFFER
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
1. SOLICITATION NO.
W9127821R0051
2. TYPE OF
SOLICITATION
SEALED BID (IFB)
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
3. DATE ISSUED
9 JUNE 2021
PAGES OF PAGES
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO.
6. PROJECT NO.
MHF20005
7. ISSUED BY CODE CT 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, MOBILE
CONTRACTING DIVISION (CESAM-CT)
109 SAINT JOSEPH STREET
MOBILE, AL 36628-0001
SAME AS BLOCK 7
9. FOR INFORMATION
CALL : Eli Couch
Kimberly Brackett
A. NAME
Elisha.Couch@usace.army.mil Kimberly.L.Brackett@usace.army.mil
B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS) 251-690-3354 251-441-5170
SOLICITATION
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date):
CONSTRUCT FY-21 AIRMAN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FACILITY EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
* See Section 01 00 00, Paragraph “COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK”.
**Block 13A. : Refer to Section 00 11 00 for the number of copies to submit with the original offer.
11. The Contractor shall begin performance within _8____ calendar days and complete it within __*__ calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed.
This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _ __ .)
12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
YES NO
12B. CALENDAR DAYS
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Sealed offers in original and ___**___ copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by _1400_ (hour) local time 16 22 JULY 2021 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.
B. An offer guarantee is, is not required.
C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
D. Offers providing less than __120__ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.
NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101
STANDARD FORM 1442(REV. 4-85)
Prescribed by GSA FAR(48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)
Revised by Amendment No. W9127821R0051-0004
14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)
16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)
CODE FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within _________ calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement
AMOUNTS
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT NO.
DATE
20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER
(Type or print)
20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT
23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
ITEM
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )
26. ADMINISTERED BY CODE 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work, requisitions identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award,
(b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.
30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED
TO SIGN (Type or print)
31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
30B. SIGNATURE
30C. DATE 31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BY
31C. AWARD
DATE
STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)
SECTION 00 12 00
00 12 00
3.3 Volume II - Evaluation of Factor 1 – Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor. Factor 1 will be rated with relevancy ratings and a confidence rating applied as described below.
(1) An Offeror’s “Relevant Company Effort” information will be evaluated to determine if the construction and design projects submitted are “recent”, and “relevant”. For this solicitation, the Government will give more consideration for: design-bid-build construction projects; projects on military installations; projects of a dollar value similar to those anticipated under this solicitation; and projects where the Offeror performed as the prime contractor, as opposed to a subcontractor. Offerors demonstrating a project portfolio with more “relevant” projects may be given more consideration; and therefore, a higher confidence rating as identified below.
(2) The Government will then assess how well an Offeror performed on their projects. The Government will, as necessary, confirm quality of past performance data provided by the Offeror and, at its discretion, obtain additional past performance information, if available, from other sources.
When the relevant performance record indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective action taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and evaluate their effectiveness.
(3) Upon completion of its evaluation of each project, the SSEB, by consensus, will assign each project one of the following ratings:
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Very Relevant - Present/Past effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude, effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant - Present/Past effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant - Present/Past effort involved some scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant - Present/Past effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
No overall relevancy rating is assigned to an Offeror’s portfolio of projects. Rather, after checking compliance and assigning each project a relevancy rating, the SSEB will then determine an overall Performance Confidence Assessment rating. The overall Performance Confidence Assessment rating takes into consideration the degree of relevancy of each project, and the quality ratings of those projects.
(4) If the Offeror is submitting as a Joint Venture (JV), the SSEB will utilize the information submitted to conduct the relevancy and performance confidence assessment ratings of the JV, as previously indicated. Based on the information submitted by the JV Offeror, the SSEB will evaluate and assess:
SECTION 00 12 00
(i) The JV’s “Past Performance Information”, and/or
(ii) Either JV partners’ “Past Performance Information”
(5) The overall Performance Confidence Assessment Rating reflects the degree of probability that the Offeror will be able to meet the solicitation’s requirements. Upon completion of the evaluation, one of the following ratings will be assigned:
Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings and Description Substantial Confidence
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonable assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Limited Confidence
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
(6) Offerors and Lead Design Firms with little or no relevant past performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably for Factor 1.
However, such a proposal will be rated neutral confidence, and thus may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government when compared to the proposals of other Offerors and Lead Design Firms with recent/relevant past performance.
(Note: The remainder of the section is unchanged by this amendment.)
| SF30 |
| LINEUP |
| Sf1442_AM04 |
| 00 12 00_AM04 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .