g18r0135_RFP_Final_v3.pdf

Design-Bid-Build Request For Proposal

DLA GENERAL PURPOSE WAREHOUSE

RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT, TX

W9126G18R0135 October, 2017

US Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District

This page was intentionally left blank

FY17 DLA General Purpose Warehouse RD17DLAGPW

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

00 11 00.01 SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD, SF-1442

00 11 00.02 CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE

00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

00 22 11 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

00 72 00 CONTRACT CLAUSES

00 73 00 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

00 73 10 SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

00 73 46 WAGE DETERMINATION SCHEDULE

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 00 00.00 44 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

01 31 19.00 44 PROJECT MEETINGS

01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

01 35 14.00 44 SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES FOR RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT

01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL

01 45 00.15 10 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE(RMS CM)

01 45 35 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS

01 57 20.00 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

01 57 23 TEMPORARY STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

01 57 24.01 44 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (TEXAS)

01 57 25.00 44 SWPP PLAN INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM

01 58 00 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT

01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS

01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA

01 91 00.15 TOTAL BUILDING COMMISSIONING

DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS

02 41 00 DEMOLITION

DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE

03 11 13.00 10 STRUCTURAL CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FORMING

03 15 00.00 10 CONCRETE ACCESSORIES

03 20 00.00 10 CONCRETE REINFORCING

03 30 00.00 10 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

03 35 00.00 10 CONCRETE FINISHING

03 39 00.00 10 CONCRETE CURING

03 45 00 PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE

DIVISION 04 - MASONRY

04 20 00 UNIT MASONRY

DIVISION 05 - METALS

05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1

05 21 00 STEEL JOIST FRAMING

05 30 00 STEEL DECKS

05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

05 51 33 METAL LADDERS

05 52 00 METAL RAILINGS

DIVISION 06 - WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES

06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY

06 20 00 FINISH CARPENTRY

06 41 16.00 10 PLASTIC-LAMINATE-CLAD ARCHITECTURAL CABINETS

06 61 16 SOLID SURFACING FABRICATIONS

DIVISION 07 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION

07 21 13 BOARD AND BLOCK INSULATION

07 21 16 MINERAL FIBER BLANKET INSULATION

07 22 00 ROOF AND DECK INSULATION

07 27 10.00 10 BUILDING AIR BARRIER SYSTEM

07 60 00 FLASHING AND SHEET METAL

07 81 00 SPRAY-APPLIED FIREPROOFING

07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING

07 92 00 JOINT SEALANTS

DIVISION 08 - OPENINGS

08 11 13 STEEL DOORS AND FRAMES

08 13 73 SLIDING METAL DOORS

08 14 00 WOOD DOORS

08 33 23 OVERHEAD COILING DOORS

08 39 54 BLAST RESISTANT DOORS

08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS

08 71 00 DOOR HARDWARE

08 81 00 GLAZING

08 91 00 METAL WALL AND DOOR LOUVERS

DIVISION 09 - FINISHES

09 29 00 GYPSUM BOARD

09 30 10 CERAMIC, QUARRY, AND GLASS TILING

09 51 00 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS

09 65 00 RESILIENT FLOORING

09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS

09 96 00 HIGH-PERFORMANCE COATINGS

DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES

10 14 00.10 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE

10 14 00.20 INTERIOR SIGNAGE

10 14 53 TRAFFIC SIGNAGE

10 21 13 TOILET COMPARTMENTS

10 22 13 WIRE MESH PARTITIONS

10 26 00 WALL AND DOOR PROTECTION

10 28 13 TOILET ACCESSORIES

10 44 16 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

10 51 13 METAL LOCKERS

10 56 13 STEEL SHELVING

DIVISION 11 - EQUIPMENT

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2

11 13 19.13 LOADING DOCK LEVELERS

DIVISION 12 - FURNISHINGS

12 21 00 WINDOW BLINDS

12 59 00 SYSTEMS FURNITURE

12 93 00 SITE FURNISHINGS

DIVISION 21 - FIRE SUPPRESSION

21 13 13.00 10 WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, FIRE PROTECTION

DIVISION 22 - PLUMBING

22 00 00 PLUMBING, GENERAL PURPOSE

DIVISION 23 - HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC)

23 00 00 AIR SUPPLY, DISTRIBUTION, VENTILATION, AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS

23 05 93 TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING FOR HVAC

23 07 00 THERMAL INSULATION FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

23 09 00 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL FOR HVAC

23 09 23.02 BACNET DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL FOR HVAC AND OTHER BUILDING

CONTROL SYSTEMS

23 35 19.00 20 INDUSTRIAL VENTILATION AND EXHAUST

23 54 16.00 10 HEATING SYSTEM; GAS-FIRED HEATERS

23 81 00.00 20 UNITARY AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT

DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL

26 00 00.00 20 BASIC ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

26 05 48.00 10 SEISMIC PROTECTION FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

26 08 00 APPARATUS INSPECTION AND TESTING

26 20 00 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

26 24 13 SWITCHBOARDS

26 28 01.00 10 COORDINATED POWER SYSTEM PROTECTION

26 33 53.00 20 UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS)

26 41 00 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM

26 51 00 INTERIOR LIGHTING

26 56 00 EXTERIOR LIGHTING

DIVISION 27 - COMMUNICATIONS

27 05 28.36 40 CABLE TRAYS FOR COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS

27 10 00 BUILDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CABLING SYSTEM

27 21 00.00 20 INTERCOMMUNICATION SYSTEM

DIVISION 28 - ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY

28 10 05 ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEMS (ESS)

28 31 76 INTERIOR FIRE ALARM AND MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM

DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 11 00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING

31 32 11 SOIL SURFACE EROSION CONTROL

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3

DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS

32 01 19 FIELD MOLDED SEALANTS FOR SEALING JOINTS IN RIGID

PAVEMENTS

32 11 16 BASE COURSE FOR RIGID AND SUBBASES FOR FLEXIBLE PAVING

32 11 24 GRADED CRUSHED AGGREGATE PAVEMENT

32 11 26 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE

32 11 30 LIME TREATED SUBGRADE

32 12 10 BITUMINOUS TACK AND PRIME COATS

32 12 17 HOT MIX BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT

32 12 21 BITUMINOUS ROAD-MIX SURFACE COURSE

32 13 13.06 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR ROADS AND SITE

FACILITIES

32 16 13 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS AND CURBS AND GUTTERS

32 17 23 PAVEMENT MARKINGS

32 31 13 CHAIN LINK FENCES AND GATES

32 92 19 SEEDING

DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES

33 05 23 TRENCHLESS UTILITY INSTALLATION

33 11 00 WATER UTILITY DISTRIBUTION PIPING

33 30 00 SANITARY SEWERS

33 32 13.13 PACKAGED SEWAGE LIFT STATIONS, WET WELL TYPE

33 34 00 FORCE MAINS AND INVERTED SIPHONS; SEWER

33 40 00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES

33 51 15 NATURAL-GAS / LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS DISTRIBUTION

33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

DIVISION 34 - TRANSPORTATION

34 41 15.00 44 TRAFFIC AND HANDICAP PARKING SIGNS

-- End of Project Table of Contents --

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4

Project Title: Construct General Purpose Warehouse at Red River Army Depot, Texarkana, Texas.

This project w ill be unrestricted.

NAICS Code: 236220 FSC: Y1GZ Size Standard: $36.5 million.

Magnitude of Construction: $25,000,000 - $100,000,000

**If the contractor fails to provide adequate and acceptable bond documents and insurance certif icate w ithin ten days af ter contract aw ard,such failure shall constitute ground for termination for default w ithout the requirement for the Contracting Officer to first issue a "show cause" letter. The Government w ill not allow the contractor to w ork on the project unless the bond documents and insurance certif icate have been accepted by the Contracting Off icer and a signed Notice to Proceed has been issued to the contractor.

ELMER HOWARD 817 886 1492

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

01-Nov-2017

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______1 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________1095 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________01 00 00.00 44

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________16 Jan 2018 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, FORT WORTH

ATTN: CESWF-CT

819 TAYLOR ST, ROOM 2A17

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300

W9126G

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

01:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

817-886-6403FAX:TEL: 817-886-1043 TEL: FAX:

W9126G18R0135 84

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Estimated Estimated Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount

0001 All work to construct the General Purpose Warehouse, exclusive of all other work listed separately. 1 JOB $ *** $

0002 Construction of all Exterior Work outside the building(s)'s 5-foot line(s) (Including earthwork, utilities, paving, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, screen walls, turfing, landscaping,and all other work not listed separately)

1 JOB $ *** $

OPTIONS

0002 OPTION NO. 1: Construct aircurtains at the overhead doors. 1 JOB *** $

0003 OPTION NO. 2: Construct wooden gazebo. 1 JOB *** $

0004 OPTION NO. 3: Construct high volume fans. 1 JOB *** $

TOTAL BASE OFFER

TOTAL (BASE OFFER + ALL OPTIONS)

FY17 DLA General Purpose Warehouse Red River Army Depot, Texas

Solicitation No.: W9126G-18-R-0135

CLIN SCHEDULE

Section 00 11 00 Page 1

Section: 00 11 00 W9126G-18-R-0135

DLA General Purpose Warehouse Red River Army Depot, TX

CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE

NOTES:

NOTE NO. 1. To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Contract Line Item (CLIN) schedules as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

NOTE NO. 2. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items of the CLIN Schedule. Failure to do so may result in the offer being unacceptable

NOTE NO. 3. Not Used.

NOTE NO. 4. CONDITIONS GOVERNING EVALUATION OF OFFERS AND AWARD OF CONTRACTS:

The Government may require the delivery of the numbered line items, identified in the schedule as option items, in the quantity and at the price stated in the schedule. Subject to the availability of funds, the Contracting Officer may exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor within the time indicated below from the Notice to Proceed

NOTE NO. 5. All the extensions of the unit prices shown will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the unit price and the extension, the unit price will be considered to be the offer.

NOTE NO. 6. Not Used.

NOTE NO. 7. Not Used

NOTE NO. 8. CLIN 0001, design includes costs for efforts related to the design of the complex, as well as any related costs for the constructor’s coordination during design (see Section 00 73 00 Special Contract Requirement (SCR): Constructor’s Role During Design). In general, include engineering and designer costs for efforts after the Design Complete or Issued for Construction documents in the construction CLIN’s.

NOTE NO. 9. Include all costs for coordination and accommodation of Government-Furnished, Government- Installed Equipment, as described in Section 01 10 00 STATEMENT OF WORK, in the Contract Line Items for construction of the associated facilities.

NOTE NO. 10. Not Used.

NOTE NO. 11. The Offeror shall propose a total integrated contract duration in number of calendar days after the Notice to Proceed (NTP) is received by the Contractor, whether via electronic means or hard copy, whichever is the earliest method of delivery. The total number of proposed calendar days for design and construction through completion, ready for turnover shall not exceed the number of calendar days specified in Section 00 73 10 Supplemental Contract Requirements and 01 00 00.00 44 Construction Schedule . The proposed duration shall become the required contract duration. The Government may issue the NTP via e-mail or Facsimile (FAX) or by other means. Day number 1 is the day after the date of receipt of the NTP.

NOTE NO. 12. At the option of the Government, the Government may require the Contractor to perform the work identified as Optional line item(s) at the price(s) stated in the CLIN Schedule. The Contracting Officer may

Section: 00 11 00 W9126G-18-R-0135

DLA General Purpose Warehouse Red River Army Depot, TX

CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE

exercise one or more of the Option(s) by written notice to the Contractor within 30 calendar days after the date of the acknowledgment of the Notice to Proceed by the Contractor. There is no separate completion period for these option(s) and the work included therein shall be completed within the contract duration as proposed above.

Exercise of the Option(s) shall be evidenced on Standard Form 30, citing this CLIN Schedule note as the authority for exercising the Option. The Option shall be deemed exercised at the time the Government deposits the SF30 in the mail or, if earlier, at the time it is delivered to the Contractor.

NOTE NO. 13. 52.217-5 EVALUATION OF OPTIONS (JUL 1990)

(a) Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government's best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(b) The Government may reject an offer as nonresponsive if it is materially unbalanced as to prices for the basic requirement and the option quantities. An offer is unbalanced when it is based on prices significantly less than cost for some work and prices which are significantly overstated for other work.

NOTE NO. 14. Responders are advised that this requirement may be delayed, cancelled or revised at any time during the solicitation, selection, evaluation, negotiation and/or final award process based on decisions related to DOD changes in force structure and disposition of the Armed Forces.

NOTE NO. 15. The Army will procure this facility through a design and cost competition in accordance with the provisions set forth in this Request for Proposals (RFP). When the task order is awarded, it will be a "Firm Fixed Price Contract."

NOTE NO. 16. Any proposal that is materially unbalanced as to prices for the Base Schedule may be rejected.

An unbalanced proposal is one that is based on prices significantly less than the cost for some work and prices that are significantly overstated for other work and can also exist where only overpricing or underpricing exists.

NOTE NO. 17. ABBREVIATIONS

For the purpose of this solicitation, the units of measure are represented as follows:

a. LS (lump sum)

NOTE NO. 18. Not Used

END OF CLIN SCHEDULE

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors

LOCAL INFORMATION

PROJECT INFORMATION

a. For technical information regarding plans and specifications contact Darren Stouffer, Red River Army Depot Eastern Area Office, Fort Worth District, Corps of Engineers, telephone 903.831.1970 or email at Darren.K.Stouffer@usace.army.mil.

b. For information regarding bidding procedures or bonds, contact, Elmer Howard, telephone 817-886-1492 or via email elmer.howard@usace.army.mil . Collect calls are not accepted.

c. Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

GENERAL NOTICES

a. Offerors must provide full, accurate, and complete information as required by this solicitation and its attachments. The penalty for making false statements in Offers is prescribed in 18 USC 1001. (FAR 52.214-4).

b. The Affirmative Action Requirement of the Equal Opportunity Clause may apply to any contract resulting from this RFP.

OFFEROR’S QUALIFICATIONS

Pursuant to FAR 9.1, before an offer is considered for award, the offeror will be requested by the Government to submit a statement regarding his previous experience in performing comparable work, his business and technical organization, financial resources, and plant available to be used in performing the work.

NOTICE REGARDING POTENTIAL EMPLOYMENT ON MILITARY INSTALLATION

If the work called for by this request for proposal is located on a military installation, offerors should check with post/base security to determine if potential employees will be allowed on the base/post to seek employment.

BID GUARANTEE

Reference the provision 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee. Facsimile Bonds are not acceptable.

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST

The estimated cost of the proposed construction is between $25,000,000 - $100,000,000.

SPECIAL NOTICE CONCERNING INDIVIDUAL SURETIES

The Security interest, including pledged assets as set forth in the FAR 52.228-11, PLEDGES OF ASSETS, and executed Standard Form 28 entitled "AFFIDAVIT OF INDIVIDUAL SURETY" shall be furnished with the bond.

Failure to provide with the bid bond a pledge of assets (security interest) in accordance with FAR 28.203-1 will result in rejection of a bid which is bonded by individual sureties.

PARTNERING

In order to accomplish this contract, the government is encouraging the formation of a cohesive partnership with the contractor and its subcontractors. This partnership would strive to draw on the strengths of each organization in an effort to achieve a quality project done right the first time, within budget, and on schedule. This partnership would be bilateral in make-up and participation would be totally voluntary. Any cost associated with effectuating this partnership will be agreed to by both parties and will be shared equally with no change in contract price.

mailto:Darren.K.Stouffer@usace.army.mil mailto:paige.e.stone@usace.army.mil

PRINCIPAL CONTRACTING OFFICER

The Contracting Officer who signs this contract will be the Principal Contracting Officer for this contract. However, any Contracting Officer assigned to the Fort Worth District, contracting within his or her authority, may take formal action on this contract when a contract action needs to be taken and the Principal Contracting Officer is unavailable.

PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY CONTRACTOR

The successful bidder/offeror must furnish the Contracting Officer within 20 days after award the following a description of the work which he intends to perform with his own organization (e.g., earthwork, paving, brickwork, or roofing), the percentage of the total work this represents, and the estimated cost thereof.

FOREIGN ONWERSHIP CONTROL OR INTERESTS (FOCI)

All prospective contract bidding companies are subject to vetting against Foreign Ownership Control or Interests (FOCI). Submittal of a Statement of Affiliation (SOA) must be accomplished as detailed in the RFP. SOA information will be protected in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974. The use of the SOA is not for obtaining a facility clearance.

Information obtained from the vetting process will be adjudicated by the Accrediting Official (AO) and designated appointees, who will have the final decision regarding the eligibility of the company following the FOCI process.

Reasonable requests to review information for accuracy will be met, but there is no appeal process for final decisions. In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974 information obtained for adjudicative purposes will not be shared outside of elements involved in the adjudicative process. The Accrediting Official (AO), SSM will not share the rationale for adjudicative decisions.

BIDDER INQUIRY

Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via:

Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system.

To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user.

Verify that information on next screen is correct and click to continue.

From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry. Only one question will be allowed per inquiry. If multiple questions are included in a single inquiry, only the first question will be answered. All others will remain unanswered until entered in as single inquiries.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation Number is: W9126G18R0135 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: D4SW39-YWEGEM

The Bidder Inquiry System will be closed to new inquiries five (5) calendar days prior to proposal submission in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary. If the System is not closed in a timely manner, an inquiry posted within seven calendar days of the receipt of proposals will still be regarding as untimely and will not afforded a substantive response.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

The bidder call center operates weekdays from 8am to 5pm U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

http://www.projnet.org/projnet

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 252.236-7008 Contract Prices-Bidding Schedules DEC 1991

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation. [Contracting Officer check appropriate box.]

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract resulting from this solicitation.

(End of provision)

52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996)

(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.

(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States.

The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.-

(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20 percent of the bid price or $3 Million whichever is less.-

(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.-

(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.

(End of provision)

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District 819 Taylor Street, Rm 2A17 (Attn: CESWF-CT) Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

(End of provision)

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for-- 20 December 2017 at 9:00 am CST

(c) Participants will meet at— Red River Army Depot, Main Entrance Gate, Visitor Center, Bldg. 455A

POC: Darren Stouffer Telephone: 903-831-1970 Email: darren.k.stouffer@usace.army.mil

(End of provision)

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil

52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (APR 1984)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of"(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any DFARS (48 CFR Chapter 2) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

Section 00 22 11 - Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria, and Basis of Award One Step - Best Value, Design-Build (Single Award)

DBB SELECTION PROCEDURES

DESIGN-BID-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

1. OVERVIEW

2. BASIS OF AWARD

3. GENERAL INSTRUCTION

3.1. GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT

4. EVALUATION FACTORS AND WEIGHTING, VOLUME 1, TECHNICAL

4.1. GENERAL

4.2. PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

5. TAB A– FACTOR 1–PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.2. RELEVANCY DETERMINATION

5.3. CONFIDENCE EVALUATION CRITERIA

6. TAB B – FACTOR 2 – TECHNICAL APPROACH

SUBFACTOR 2a – PROJECT STAFFING

6.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

6.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

7. TAB C – FACTOR 2 -- TECHNICAL APPROACH

SUBFACTOR 2b -- SUMMARY SCHEDULE

7.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

7.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

8. TAB D– FACTOR 3 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

8.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

8.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

9. PRICE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION, VOLUME 2, PRICE

9.1. TABLE 2 - Volume 2 – PRICE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION

9.2. GENERAL

10. TAB A – FACTOR 4 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442 AND BID SCHEDULE)

10.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

10.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

11. TAB B –BID GUARANTEE

11.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

11.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

12. TAB C –REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

12.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

12.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

13. TAB D –SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

13.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

13.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

14. TAB E –REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

14.1.SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

15. EVALUATION CRITERIA

15.1. GENERAL

15.2. DISCUSSIONS (IF NECESSARY)

16. EVALUATION AND RATING SYSTEM

16.1.GENERAL

16.2. REVIEW WRITE-UP

16.3. RATING SYSTEM

17. DEFINITIONS

18. PAST PERFORMANCE RATINGS

19. PRICE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION RATINGS

20. ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT 1- PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

ATTACHMENT 2- PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

ATTACHMENT 3- COMPANY PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRRE

ATTACHMENT 4- SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

ATTACHMENT 5- CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (APR 2010)

1.0 OVERVIEW

This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits for the construction of a General Purpose Warehouse at Red River Army Depot, located in Texarkana, Texas. The Design-Bid-Build project shall consist of the construction of the General Purpose Warehouse totaling 240,000 square feet storage capacity and 3,000 square feet of administrative space. This solicitation is for a Design-Bid-Build, Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contract at Red River Army Depot, Texarkana, Texas.

The work shall be in accordance with the Request for Proposal documents. The proposed project will be a competitive Unrestricted, Full-and-Open competition resulting in the award of a firm-fixed price contract procured in accordance with FAR 15.101, Negotiated Procurement using the “Tradeoff Process”.

The Tradeoff Process permits the tradeoffs among cost, price and/or non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal. Offerors submit their performance and capability information for review and consideration by the Government. Relative weights among technical factors are provided in Section 4: Evaluation Factors & Weighting. The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) reviews, evaluates, and rates the proposals against the source selection criteria in the RFP. A competitive range consisting of the most highly qualified technical offerors will be established prior to discussions (if held). Concurrently, the Government analyzes price proposals of Offerors utilizing the project cost proposal. Price will not be rated, but will be a factor in making the final best value determination for award. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) compares proposals and determines the best value for the government. The perceived benefits of the higher priced proposal must merit the additional cost, and the rationale for tradeoffs must be documented.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Contracting Officer (CO) will award a firm fixed-price contract to that responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority (SSA) determines offers the best overall value to the Government. Best Value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement. In using the best value approach, the Government seeks to award a contract to the Offeror who gives the Government the greatest confidence that it will best meet our requirements.

This process may result in an award being made to a firm with a higher-priced offer where the decision is consistent with the evaluation criteria/factors and the SSA determines that the technical or service superiority and/or overall business approach and/or superior past performance of the higher-priced offer outweighs the cost difference.

The SSA, using sound business judgment, bases the award decision on an integrated assessment of the evaluation criteria in the factors described below. While the entire evaluation team strives for maximum objectivity, the selection process is subjective by nature and professional judgment is implicit throughout the best value process. Ultimately, the contract shall be awarded to the Offeror whose proposal, based upon the evaluation criteria, represents the best value to the Government.

Proposals must meet the criteria stated in the RFP in order to be eligible for award, to include responsiveness, technical acceptability and responsibility.

In order to determine which proposal(s) represent the best value, the Government will be determined by a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in this RFP.

As technical ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages become less distinct, differences in price between proposals are of increased importance in determining the most advantageous proposal.

Conversely, as differences in price become less distinct, differences in technical ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages between proposals are of increased importance to the determination. All evaluation factors when combined are significantly more important than price.

The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer(s). The right is also reserved to reject any and all offers.

Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer.

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Firms formally organized as a single entity firms that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors.

Any legally organized Offeror may submit a proposal.

Contractor Team Arrangements. Contractor Team Arrangements are considered an arrangement in which: two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or (2) a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program. In accordance with FAR Subpart 9.6, the Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements; provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in the offer. The Offeror shall identify the major or critical aspects of the requirement to be performed by those identified in the Contractor Team Arrangement. The submission must contain a narrative that clearly explains the relevance to a particular factor of information concerning a company that is part of a Contractor Team Arrangement.

The Government will consider the adequacy of this explanation in deciding the relevance of the information to this procurement.

Any Offeror submitting an offer in the name of a joint venture, shall include a fully executed copy of the joint venture agreement with the offer. Joint venture agreements which require SBA approval may be submitted absent the requisite SBA Servicing Agency approving authorities’ signature; however, the Offeror shall submit evidence from the Offeror’s SBA Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this project with the appropriate SBA personnel.

Offerors shall submit their proposal per the instructions provided in Section 00 21 00. Proposals are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

3.1 PROPOSAL FORMAT:

(1) Submit only the electronic documents. Submit only the electronic files specifically requested. All files submitted shall be in PDF format. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. All pages shall be numbered.

(2) PDF pages shall be formatted to print on 8 ½ by 11 inch paper, unless another paper size is specifically authorized for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide, but may include headers and footers of the solicitation, project title and company. PDF drawings and summary schedule diagrams shall be sized to print on 11x17 inch paper.

(3) Hard copies shall not be submitted, with the exception of the bid guarantee. Refer to Section 00 21 00, 1.12 Bid Guarantee for bid guarantee submission requirements.

(4) “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

(5) In the case of an Offeror that is part of a large, multi-segmented business concern, provide information directly pertaining to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) that will perform work under the prospective contract.

(6) For submissions with page limitations, the corresponding PDF pages will be counted.

(7) Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision or amendment, e.g., Error, Omission or Clarification shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered and clearly marked “REVISED”, with the date of revision.

(8) Within three (3) days of contract award, the contractor receiving the award shall electronically submit their conformed proposal.

4.0 EVALUATION FACTORS AND WEIGHTING, VOLUME 1, TECHNICAL

4.1 GENERAL:

Offerors are invited to submit a proposal, as indicated below. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria described herein, using the evaluation rating systems outlined in the Design-Bid-Build selection procedures. Price information will be evaluated for fairness, reasonableness, and for material unbalancing, as described herein. The evaluation will be conducted in accordance with FAR Part 15.

4.2. PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME 1 – Technical

Table 1 - Volume 1 – PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

Location Factor Number Description Relative

Importance

TAB A Factor 1 PAST PERFORMANCE Most Important

Factor 2 TECHNICAL APPROACH

TAB B Subfactor 2a PROJECT STAFFING Less Important than Factor 1. More Important than Subfactor 2b and Factor 3.

TAB C Subfactor 2b SUMMARY SCHEDULE Less Important than Factor 1 & Subfactor 2a.

More Important than Factor 3.

TAB D Factor 3 SMALL BUSINESS

PARTICIPATION

Less Important than Factor 1, Subfactor 2a & Subfactor 2b.

5.0 TAB A – FACTOR 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

5.1.1. The Offerors shall demonstrate past performance through the submission of similar projects, using the Construction – Past Performance Assessment Worksheet (Attachment 2). If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, Limited Liability Corporation (LLC), Partnership, Teaming Arrangement, or Parent company/subsidiary/affiliate as identified in the offeror’s proposal, provide past performance information for construction projects relevant to each of the proposed roles on this project. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer. If projects were design-bid-build, identify them as such. Offeror can submit no more than three (3) projects (up to one proposal data sheet per project) that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the scope of the work for this solicitation to be considered relevant. One (1) of the three (3) projects submitted for past performance may be a current construction project with at least 50% construction progress completed. If offeror is proposing as a Joint Venture (JV) LLC, Partnership and/or Teaming Arrangement and past performance cannot be provided as such, each partner shall submit past performance information, with no more than three (3) projects each.

5.1.2. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation (Attachment 3) is provided for the Offeror to submit to the client for each project the Offeror included for Factor 1, Past Performance that does not have an interim or final CPARS or CCASS evaluation or is a non- Federal Government project. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQ should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If any negative past performance information is received to which the Offeror has not an opportunity to respond, the contractor will be given an opportunity to provide rebuttal. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Elmer Howard, via e-mail at:

Elmer.Howard@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date.

5.1.2.1. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposals PPQ’s previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

5.1.2.2. Do not request past performance questionnaires (PPQ) on projects that have interim or final CPARS or CCASS evaluations. If an interim or final CPARS or CCASS evaluation exists and a PPQ is provided for the same project, the CPARS or CCASS evaluation will be reviewed as the official past performance record for the project, and the PPQ will not be considered by the Source Selection Board or the Source Selection Authority.

5.1.2.3. For USACE or other DoD projects which are underway but do not yet have an interim or final CPARS or CCASS evaluation, one PPQ per contract may be submitted; to be considered, the PPQ shall be signed by the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) for the contract.

5.1.3. Offerors are not required to submit any additional past performance information. The Government will utilize CPARS, CCASS and any other information deemed relevant to assess confidence in the Offeror’s ability to perform,

5.1.3.1. Offerors may submit information on past performance issues and corrective actions taken to prevent these issues from reoccurring. Discuss whether these corrective actions have been implemented on contracts awarded subsequent to the performance issues, the effectiveness of the corrective actions, and POC information for the subsequent contracts.

5.1.4. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluation of past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS number of team members (Partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquires of owner representative(s), Federal Awardees Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

5.1.5. Projects will be considered relevant to this procurement as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

5.1.6. The Offeror may provide a supplemental narrative (not project lists), not to exceed two pages, explaining how any corporate past performance that is not directly related to the specific projects above is applicable to this project and how the Government will benefit.

5.2 RELEVANCY DETERMINATION:

5.2.1. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant the past performance is to the project under consideration. Past performance on the projects identified in the project forms will receive more consideration than past performance provided in the supplemental narrative. The Government will place greater value on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations.

Federal Government project past performance will not be rated inherently more important than non- Federal Government project past performance.

5.2.2. More relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

5.2.3. Contracts with lower degrees of relevance will not be as strong of predictors of likely future contract performance success and will typically have less influence on the final past performance confidence rating.

5.2.4. Contracts that have little or no relevance typically do not influence the performance confidence rating; however, any contracts with adverse past performance could reflect larger company-wide concerns and may have impact upon the past performance confidence rating.

5.2.5. Based on the relevancy of the projects submitted, an overall relevancy determination will be assessed as an interim step prior to establishing a confidence rating. An overall determination of “very relevant” can only be achieved if a single project meets all four of the relevancy criteria. If all four relevancy criteria are met through a combination of two or more projects, the overall relevancy determination will be no higher than “relevant”.

5.2.6. Offeror can submit no more than three (3) projects (up to one proposal data sheet per project) that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the scope of the work for this solicitation to be considered relevant. One (1) of the three (3) projects submitted for past performance may be a current construction project with at least 50% construction progress completed. If offeror is proposing as a Joint Venture (JV) LLC, Partnership and/or Teaming Arrangement and past performance cannot be provided as such, each partner shall submit past performance information, with no more than three (3) projects each.

5.3 CONFIDENCE EVALUATION CRITERIA:

5.3.1. The SSEB will review the past performance information available, to include CPARS, CCASS and other past performance information deemed relevant, to…