W9124J20R0014 Amendment 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See Amendment Narrative for details.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-Nov-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9124J20R0014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14-Oct-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Nov-2020

CODE

MICC - FSH

ATTN: MICC - FSH

2205 INFANTRY POST RD

210-466-2145

FORT SAM HOUSTON TX 78234-1361

W9124J 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9124J20R0014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

AMENDMENT NARRATIVE

The purpose of this solicitation amendment is to:

a. Extend the closing date from 16 Nov 20 to 19 Nov 20.

b. Provide answers to technical questions received.

c. Update Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, TAB F.

d. Update the Attachment List.

e. Updated DFARS 252. 216-7006.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 16-Nov-2020 12:00 PM to 19-Nov-2020 12:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

I. Proposal Preparation Instructions

A. Proposal Submittal and Inquiries

1. Due to the situation surrounding COVID-19 and DoD guidance, Offerors will be required to e-mail their proposal documents to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at the following email addresses:

samuel.j.colton.civ@mail.mil and madeline.m.allison.civ@mail.mil. Should the files be too large to e-mail the Offeror will need to e-mail the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist for the Government to submit a “Request a Drop-off” request through the DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) web-based tool. Once the Government submits the request Offerors will have fourteen (14) days to upload their digital proposal files for “Pick-Up” by the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist before the request expires. The Offerors e-mail submission or submission through the DoD SAFE must be made no later than (NLT) the closing date and time specified in the solicitation.

2. The point of contact responsible for providing additional information and answering all inquiries is the Contracting Officer via the Contract Specialist. All questions or concerns regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at the following email addresses:

samuel.j.colton.civ@mail.mil and madeline.m.allison.civ@mail.mil.

3. Due to the situation surrounding COVID-19 and DoD guidance a Site Visit for this requirement will NOT be conducted at Fort Leonard Wood, MO. Please refer to the attachments provided to this solicitation for building information.

Any and all technical questions or clarifications will need to be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist as specified in the instructions below.

All Technical Questions are due No Later Than (NLT) 28 October 2020, 12:00 PM CST. Offerors will submit questions in writing to Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist through samuel.j.colton.civ@mail.mil and madeline.m.allison.civ@mail.mil. The Government will answer questions received up until due date listed above and provide responses to interested parties via System for Award Management (SAM) website at http://beta.sam.gov. Questions received after this date may not be answered.

B. General Instructions

1. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements in addition to those identified as evaluation factors and subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award in the absence of discussions. Taking exception to any provision in the solicitation without addressing the exception with the contracting office before the proposal due date specified within the solicitation will render the proposal ineligible for award. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offerors, the contracting officer will review this determination, and if adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested. However, if at any time during this process the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness of the proposed price.

2. This procurement is subject to the Randolph-Sheppard Act (R-SA), 20 U.S.C. §107, Operation of Vending Facilities and 34 CFR §395.33, Operation of Cafeterias by Blind Vendors, which establishes a priority for blind persons recognized and represented by the State Licensing Agency (SLA), in the award of contracts for the operation of cafeterias on federal facilities. Accordingly, although the solicitation is set-aside 100% for small business, the State Licensing Agency will also be permitted to submit a proposal in accordance with 34 CFR 395.33(b). This notice is not designed to discourage competition rather, it notifies all potential offerors that the priority established by the R-SA for proposals received from SLAs and their blind vendors is applicable to this procurement.

3. The selection of a source for award purposes will be conducted utilizing FAR Part 12 (Acquisition of Commercial Items) in conjunction with FAR Part 15 (Contracting by Negotiation). Offers will be evaluated using the criteria under the Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items. Award will be made to a single offeror whose timely offer is deemed responsible IAW FAR, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, represents the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) offer, or to the SLA under the R-SA priority pursuant to the procedures outline in this solicitation. The source selection steps are delineated in the addendum to 52.212-2.

4. By submission of its offer, the offeror agrees to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements to include those identified specifically as evaluation factors and subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being rejected.

5. Noncompliance with the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements may hamper the Government’s ability to properly evaluate the proposal and may result in elimination of the proposal from further consideration for contract award.

6. Proposals shall remain valid for 120 days following the date specified for receipt of offers.

7. Instructions outlined in paragraph C below, prescribes the format for the proposal and describes the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals.

8. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise deemed unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

9. IAW FAR 4.8, Government Contract Files, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals.

10. All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the System for Award Management (SAM) website at http://beta.sam.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time email notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

11. Debriefings. Upon notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing IAW the requirements of FAR 15.506.

C. Proposal Preparation Instructions

1. The offeror’s proposal shall consist of four (4) separate volumes: Volume I – RFP Documents, Volume II – Technical, Volume III – Past Performance, and Volume IV – Price.

2. Exception: IAW FAR Part 19.702, the SLA, if submitting a proposal, shall submit Volume V – Subcontracting Plan. Volume V shall be submitted as identified in paragraph 4.e. Instructions for required components for the subcontracting plan can be found at FAR Clause 52.219-9 Alt II (Dev 2018-O0018) and DFARS Clause 252.219- 7003.

3. Proposal Format.

a. Offerors shall submit an original copy, listed in paragraph c. Table 2 below, of their proposal.

b. Exceptions. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors and sub-factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offeror being ineligible for award. If the offeror finds it necessary to take exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly identify the applicable Volume and exceptions with a complete explanation of why the exception was taken, what benefit accrues to the Government (if any), and its impact (if any), on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Offerors are cautioned that taking an exception may render the offer ineligible for award. This information shall be provided in the format below in Table 1.

Table 1 – Solicitation Exceptions

Solicitation Document Page/Paragraph Requirement/Portion Rationale & Impact

PWS

Evaluation Factors for Award, etc.

Applicable Page and Paragraph Numbers.

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken.

Describe the rationale and impact of the exception.

c. The proposals shall be organized into the four (4) volumes identified at Table 2. The SLA is required to also submit Volume V. A cover sheet should be provided, clearly marked as to volume number, title, solicitation identification, and offeror’s name. All text shall be single spaced and on white background with black color font (Black and white requirement does not apply to graphics or photos. Company stationary and logos are acceptable).

Documents shall be easily readable (12-pitch type or 10 point proportion spacing). Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections. Digital copies shall be provided in Microsoft Word, PDF, PowerPoint, and/or Excel as outlined in Table 2. The file name shall be “Company Name – Initial” for the first submission. The file name of later submissions (if necessary), shall be “Company Name – Revision X” with X indicating the number of the revision. Page limitations are as follows in Table 2:

Table 2 – Proposal Submittal Instructions and Format

VOLUME TITLE NO. OF DIGITAL

& ELECTRONIC

COPIES

PAGE LIMIT

I RFP Documents 1 EA – MS Word or

PDF

N/A

II Technical 1 EA – MS Word, PDF or Excel

100 Total

III Past Performance 1 EA – MS Word, PDF or Excel

10 pages per reference

IV Price 1 EA – MS Word or Excel

None

V Subcontracting Plan

(SLA ONLY)

1 EA – MS Word, PDF or Excel

d. Proposal Limitations. The proposal shall not exceed the limits stated at Table 2 (above). If the page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit shall be removed and unread. The Government will not accept any changes to the offeror’s proposal after the closing date of the solicitation (see FAR Provision 52.212-1(f), for further information regarding late proposals). If discussions become necessary, page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors.

e. Page Limit includes all appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, or drawings.

f. Page Limit does not include covers for volumes, tables of contents, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, staffing matrix (Attachment H) and section dividers/tables if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. Pages will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams or extraneous data. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

g. What Counts As A Page. A page shall be an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper. Letter size and spacing requirements for illustrations and tables can be at the discretion of the offeror but must be easily readable. Margins shall be at least 1 inch on the top and bottom and ¾ inch on the side. The offeror shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. In the event an offeror creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

h. Indexing. Each volume shall contain a detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.

i. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used with a definition for each.

4. Proposal Content.

a. Volume 1 – RFP Documents. Offerors are required to submit a completed SF 1449 (Solicitation, Offer and Award) (Including Acknowledgment of Amendments). All final monetary extensions shall be in whole dollars only.

Failure to follow the Contract Proposal preparation instructions may cause your proposal to be deemed unacceptable by the Government. Volume I shall be organized as follows and contain the identified information.

TAB A. Exceptions/Assumptions (if required) – Identification and explanation of any exceptions or deviations. Additionally, any assumptions used in the proposal preparation must be identified. See Table 1 – Solicitation Exceptions.

TAB B. Solicitation, Offer and Award – The SF 1449 shall be submitted fully completed. The offeror is cautioned that the SF 1449 must contain an original signature in Block 30a of the form. The contractor shall acknowledge any amendments to the RFP IAW the instructions on the SF 1449 and with Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors of the Solicitation, FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items. The offeror shall provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contract regarding decisions made with respect to the proposal and who can obligate the company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

TAB C. Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs – The offeror shall ensure the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation is fully completed and error free. It shall contain the offeror’s prices for the established Contract Line Items Numbers (CLINS).

TAB D. Representation, Certification, and Other Statements of Offerors – The offeror shall ensure that corresponding Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors are submitted thoroughly completed with all blocks in each certification/representation completed truthfully and completely.

TAB E. Contingency Plan - Offerors shall submit a Contingency Plan IAW DFARS Clause 252.237-7024, Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Services, and PWS paragraph 2.2.1.4. Note: Although the plan is required, it will not be included in the source selection evaluation or be considered in the basis for award.

TAB F. Property Management Plan (PMP) - Offerors shall submit a PMP IAW FAR Clause 52.245-1, Government Property, and PWS paragraph 5. The Offeror’s property management plans shall include the methods, practices, or procedures for accounting for property that are consistent with the requirements of the solicaition. Note:

Although the plan is required, it will not be included in the source selection evaluation or be considered in the basis for award.

b. Volume II – Technical Volume.

(1) The Technical Volume shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims in the Offeror’s proposal. The responses will be evaluated against the Technical Capability Factor and Subfactors defined in the Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items.

Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Technical requirements or the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect and understanding of the requirement or the capability to perform. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS (including referenced publications or technical data); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used” etc., will be considered unacceptable. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their technical capabilities and past experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

See Table 2 for page limits associated with the proposal.

(2) The Technical proposal will be evaluated against the Technical Capability Factor and Subfactors defined in the Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items. The section shall be prepared in an orderly format and in sufficient detail to enable the Government to make a thorough evaluation of the contractor’s technical competence and ability to comply with the contract task requirements specified in the PWS.

(3) The volume shall be organized according to the following general outline.

Tab A – Table of Contents Tab B – List of Tables and Drawings Tab C – Cross Reference Matrix Tab D – Factor 1 Technical Capability

(4) Additional information specific to Tab D of the Technical Volume follows:

TAB D. Technical Capability.

Subfactor 1 – Organizational Structure: The Offeror shall submit an organizational diagram with a detailed explanation of their organizational structure that identifies the following:

(a) Key position(s), qualifications for key position(s), and what authority these individuals possess;

(b) Where decision making and problem resolution authority lies within the organization;

(c) Identification of the command and control relationship among the Offeror and all proposed subcontractor(s). The command and control relationship must include identification of leadership positions (e.g., team leads, foremen, supervisors, managers) responsible for performing successful oversight of the PWS.

Subfactor 2 - Staffing Plan. The staffing plan shall include proposed staffing by labor categories to perform the required services in each building listed in the PWS and Solicitation Attachment F – Estimated Workload.

Offerors shall utilize the Solicitation Attachment H - Staffing Matrix, for depicting their staffing. Offerors are only required to complete the Staffing Matrix for CLINs/SubCLINS within the Pricing Matrix that contain estimated quantities.

In addition to completing the Staffing Matrix, offerors shall provide rationale for their staffing for the applicable dining facilities to specifically address the following:

(a) Explain the logic for the staffing (FTEs x labor categories) for not only during serving times, but for hours before and after serving times;

(b) Rationale for staffing to ensure successful continuous operations of all PWS tasks during feeding times (to include as patrons/units rotate through the facility).

Rationale needs to include their methodology for accommodating fluctuating meals within the bands, cross-utilization of personnel and minimizing employee turnover.

c. Volume III – Past Performance. The Past Performance evaluation will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of an offeror’s recent Past Performance, focusing on and targeting performance which is relevant to the effort.

Past performance information described herein is required on the offeror and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners proposed to perform 25% of the proposed effort based on the total proposed price. The offeror shall submit, along with the information required in this paragraph, a consent letter executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror’s performance.

(1) The offeror shall include documentation regarding their relevant past performance as it directly relates to the work being procured under this solicitation. The offeror SHALL NOT go back more than 3 years from the date of the solicitation for the submitted data. The past performance data shall show successful history of past contract performance.

(2) In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance Volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government to include, but not limited to, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontractor Reporting System (eSRS) or other databases; and may be obtained from other sources available to the Government, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with program managers, contracting officers, and/or fee determining officials. Offerors are reminded that both independent data and data provided by offerors in their proposals may be used by the Government to evaluate offeror past performance.

However, the burden of providing thorough, complete, and current past performance information as requested in this paragraph remains with the offerors. Proposals that do not contain the information requested in this paragraph risk rejection or a less than acceptable performance rating by the Government. All past performance comments received will be taken into consideration and could affect the overall rating. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (IAW FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or neutral) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered acceptable.

(3) Submission Requirements. The offeror shall submit a Past Performance Volume containing the following:

Table of Contents

Summary Page describing the role of the offeror and each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner that the offeror is required to provide Past Performance specific relevant contract reference sheets for the past performance experience IAW Attachment L.

Consent Letters executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing the release of past performance information so the offeror can respond to such information. A sample consent letter can be found at Attachment K.

Client Authorization Letters for each identified effort for a commercial customer authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror’s performance.

Specific Relevant Contracts Format. Complete sheets IAW Attachment L and ensure that the submission is limited to 10 pages per reference. The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or as a subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting assertion of relevance and how it is determined that the work previously performed is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.

Past Performance Questionnaire – See Attachment M - Past Performance Questionnaire. The offeror shall forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire for each of the contracts identified on the specific relevant contract reference to the points of contact responsible for monitoring performance. The points of contact shall return the questionnaires directly via email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at the following email addresses: samuel.j.colton.civ@mail.mil and madeline.m.allison.civ@mail.mil no later than the proposal due date.

Questionnaires not submitted directly to the Contracting Officer or Contract Specialist will not be reviewed and evaluated. The information contained in the properly executed and returned questionnaires will be used to evaluate the offeror’s past performance. New entities that have no past customers shall annotate on the Summary Page that they have no previous clients and that the minimum number of questionnaires cannot be provided.

d. Volume IV – Price. The offeror shall provide a price for each CLIN included in the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation. The offer shall complete the pricing matrix, (Attachment G – Pricing Matrix) and shall provide a price for each CLIN/SubCLIN in the pricing matrix. Offerors are required to submit a unit price and extended amount (estimated quantity X Unit Price = Extended Amount) for each Building within the Pricing Matrix (for SubCLINs that do not contain an estimated quantity the offeror shall simply insert a Unit Price only).

The offerors shall utilize the extended CLIN pricing from the pricing matrix to price the applicable CLIN in the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation.

The offeror shall ensure prices are represented in whole dollars only. The offeror shall include in their pricing matrix a breakdown by each labor category subject to the SCA WD and/or CBA the basic hourly labor rates being paid. The Government reserves the right to request Certified Cost or Pricing Data or Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data if the Government deems it necessary in order to determine price reasonableness.

(1) Offerors are required to submit prices for Phase-in, Project Management, each dining facility, and CMR in the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation and Attachment G - Pricing Matrix. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding six (6) months of the offeror’s final ordering year price to the offeror’s total price.

(2) The offeror is informed that Department of Labor Wage Determination is applicable to this requirement, see Solicitation Attachment I – CBA/ Supplement Union Agreement.

e. Volume V – Subcontracting Plan. The priority established by the R-SA applies to this acquisition. This requirement is being set-aside for small business. Therefore, only the SLA is required to submit subcontracting plans and those plans must contain all the elements required in FAR Clause 52.219-9 Alt II (Dev 2018-O0018) and DFARS Clause 252.219-7003. Subcontracting plans shall contain separate percentage goals using Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), HUBZone Small Business, Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB), and Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) concerns as subcontractors. Small business concerns are not required to submit a subcontracting plan. Failure to comply with the requirement herein and FAR Clause 52.219-9 Alt II (Dev 2018-O0018) and DFARS Clause 252.219-7003 shall render the offeror ineligible for award.

ATTACHMENT LIST

Attachment A: Dining Facility Location Map Attachment B: AFMIS Headcounts FY17-FY19 Attachment C: Dining Facility Drawings Attachment D1: GFP Attachment D2: Real Property Attachment D3: Durable Property Attachment E: Incidental Items Attachment F: Estimated Workload Data Attachment G: Pricing Matrix Attachment H: Staffing Matrix (Version dated 20201102) Attachment I: CBA/Supplemental Union Agreement Attachment J1 Facility Pictures BLDGs 630 & 653 Attachment J2 Facility Pictures BLDGs 754 & 1010 Attachment J3 Facility Pictures BLDGs 836 & 820 Attachment J4 Facility Pictures BLDGs 908 & 930 Attachment J5 Facility Pictures BLDGs 1792 &1784 Attachment J6 Facility Pictures BLDGs 2105 & 3223 Attachment J7 Facility Pictures BLDG 6111 Attachment K: Consent Forms for Release of Past Performance Information Attachment L: Specific Relevant Contracts Reference Sheets Attachment M: Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment N: DoD SAFE FAQ Attachment O: FTLW QA (Dated 201109)

252.216-7006 ORDERING (SEP 2019)

(a) Any supplies and services to be furnished under this contract shall be ordered by issuance of delivery orders or task orders by the individuals or activities designated in the contract schedule. Such orders may be issued from 5 February 2021 through 4 February 2026.

(b) All delivery orders or task orders are subject to the terms and conditions of this contract. In the event of conflict between a delivery order or task order and this contract, the contract shall control.

(c)(1) If issued electronically, the order is considered ``issued'' when a copy has been posted to the Electronic Data Access system, and notice has been sent to the Contractor.

(2) If mailed or transmitted by facsimile, a delivery order or task order is considered ``issued'' when the Government deposits the order in the mail or transmits by facsimile. Mailing includes transmittal by U.S. mail or private delivery services.

(3) Orders may be issued orally only if authorized in the schedule.

(End of Clause)

(End of Summary of Changes)