W9124J20R0005, Technical Exhibit B, Specific Relevant Contract Ref Sheet Revised, 10 Feb 20.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Support Base Services (SBS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9124J20R0005
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Sam Houston

About this file

This document contains a technical exhibit for a solicitation seeking support base services. The U.S. Army Installation Management Command is soliciting proposals to provide installation augmentation services at its bases in the continental United States, Hawaii, Alaska, and Puerto Rico across twelve task areas. Services procured under this contract will minimize the use of mobilized reserve component units for non-inherently governmental functions. Offerors must provide past performance references for similar contracts valued at or above $25 million annually either as a prime contractor or major subcontractor. For each reference, details of contract type and value, completion schedule, government points of contact, and narrative explanations of objectives, cost and schedule performance, and corrective actions taken must be included. The relevancy of each past performance example to the scope of work under this solicitation must also be explained.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Technical Exhibit B Support Base Services W9124J-20-R-0005 Specific Relevant Contract Reference Sheet-Revised 10 Feb 20

The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.

1. Contract Number, Award Date and Contract type.

2. Price/Cost – original awarded AND final (or projected final, if contract is current).

3. Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).

4. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable).

Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:

5. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

6. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

7. Government or commercial technical representative or COR Identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant or similar to the effort required by this solicitation. In determining relevancy, consideration should be given but not limited to such things as product/service similarity, product/service, size and complexity, contract type, contract environment, division of company proposing, and subcontractor interaction.

8. Narrative explanation on each contract listed describing the objectives achieved and the following data: any cost growth or schedule delays encountered. For any Government contracts which did not/do not meet original requirements with regard to cost, schedule, or technical performance, a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a Limited or a No Confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the offeror to be considered a Substantial Confidence or Satisfactory Confidence candidate.

9. Negative Performance Explanation/Documentation (if applicable). A copy of any cure notices, show cause letters or contract discrepancy reports received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the offeror or proposed subcontractor.

10. Relevancy Explanation The Offeror shall provide a description/explanation of how this past performance example cited is relevant (in nature, size and complexity) to the work specified by this solicitation.

1.

Contract Number __________________________ Award Date________________________________ Contract type_______________________________

2. Price/Cost – original awarded price__________________________________________ Modified Price/Cost - ____________________________________________________

3. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule.

Original completion/delivery date ______________________________________________ Revised completion/delivery date ______________________________________________

4. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:

5. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).____________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________

6. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________

7. Government or commercial technical representative or COR.

Address: ____________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: _______________________________________________________

8. Narrative explanation.____________________________________________________

9. Negative Performance Explanation Documentation.__________________________________________

10. Relevancy Explanation.___________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .