Amendment_0003_-_Released _16-R-0002 _Ft_Polk _JOC _9_Sep_16.pdf

W9124E-16-R-0002

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to revise the follow ing: Section A, update Offeror Due Date/Time, Section I, delete duplicate FAR Clause 52.211-12, Revise Section J, List of Documents, Exhibits, and other Attachments; revise Section L, Instructions, conditions and notice to offeror and Section M, Evaluation factors for aw ard.

Add Technical Exhibit 4 - Historical Workload Data, and Technical Exhibit 5-Government Responses to Industry Questions.

All changes are highlighted in yellow .

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-Sep-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9124E-16-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Aug-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Sep-2016

CODE

MISSION & INSTALLATION CONTRACTING CMD

FORT BRAGG

ANGELINA M. CLEMENTS

2175 REILLY ST, STOP A

FORT BRAGG NC 28310-5000

W9124E 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time 30-Sep-2016 03:00 PM has been added.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been deleted:

52.211-12 Liquidated Damages--Construction SEP 2000

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION

Technical Exhibit 1 Davis Bacon Wage Determinations

Technical Exhibit 2 Fort Polk Maps

Technical Exhibit 3 Fort Polk Regulation 200-1

Technical Exhibit 4 Historical Workload

Technical Exhibit 5 Responses to Questions from Industry

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS

L.1. General Instructions

a. The selection of a source for award purposes will be conducted utilizing source selection (negotiated) procedures as delineated in FAR Part 15.3. Offers will be evaluated using the criteria under Section M, “Evaluation Factors for Award.” Noncompliance with the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements may hamper the Government's ability to properly evaluate the proposal and may result in elimination of the proposal from further consideration for contract award.

b. The Offer. The submission of the documentation specified below will constitute the offeror's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the RFP, concurrence with the Statement of Work, and contract type.

c. It is the Government’s intention to award without discussions. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified.

d. Instructions outlined below, prescribe the format for the proposal and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals.

e. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise deemed unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the KO in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

f. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

g. All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities

(FedBizOpps) website at http://www.fbo.gov/. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

h. Debriefings. The KO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range, whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. The KO will notify offerors who were in the competitive range of the source but were not selected for award in accordance with FAR 15.503(b). Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.506.

L.2. Proposal Submission, Preparation Instructions, and Content.

The following instructions prescribe the format for the proposal and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals.

L.3.1. Proposal Submission. Submit signed and dated offer at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Failure to provide all required documents or information may exclude the Offeror(s) from further consideration. No email proposals will be accepted. Submit signed and dated offer at or before the exact time specified in the solicitation.

Failure to provide all required documents or information may exclude the Offeror(s) from further consideration.

Proposals SHALL be submitted to the following address:

VIA EXPRESS CARRIER OR WALK-IN:

MISSION INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND CENTER - FORT BRAGG (MICC-FB)

CCMI-CBR-BR, ATTN: MIGRATION 1 DIVISION (MS. SAMANTHA DAVIS)

W9124E-16-R-0002

BLDG 2-1105 (C-STACK, ROOM 214), MACOMB STREET

FORT BRAGG, NC 28310-5000

(910) 908-3463

NOTE: In the event discussions become necessary, proposal revisions may be received via email. Instructions on how to submit revised proposals will be issued by the KO if discussions are required.

a. All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website at https://www.fbo.gov . It is the responsibility of each Offeror to review the webpage for notice of amendments, updates, or changes to current information.

b. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208 “Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals.”

c. The Contracting Officer (KO) and the Contract Specialist are the point of contact for this acquisition.

Address all questions or concerns you may have to the Contract Specialist and/or the KO by 31 August 2016. All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing via email to:

Ms. Angelina M. Clements, Contracting Officer Ms. Samantha R. Davis, Contract Specialist Mission & Installation Contacting Command (MICC) Mission & Installation Contracting Command (MICC) MICC Center - Ft. Bragg, ATTN: CCMI-RCB MICC Center - Ft. Bragg, ATTN: CCMI-RCB 2175 Reilly Road, Stop A 2175 Reilly Road, Stop A Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000 Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000

(910) 908-3465 (910) 908-3463 angelina.m.clements.civ@mail.mil samantha.r.davis.civ@mail.mil

If the Government responses to technical questions affect the General Statement of Work requirements or any other portion of the solicitation, then an Amendment of Solicitation will be issued.

d. Acknowledgement of Solicitation Amendments. The offeror must submit a statement to acknowledge solicitation amendments, if applicable.

L.3.2. Proposal Preparation Instructions.

a. The proposals shall be organized into three (3) volumes. A cover sheet shall be clearly marked as to volume number, title, copy number, solicitation identification and the offeror's name. All text shall be single spaced and printed black on white paper (Black and white requirement does not apply to graphics, photos, etc., Company stationary and logo’s are acceptable). Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections. Page limitations are as follows:

VOLUME TITLE FORMAT

NUMBER OF

COPIES

No. of Digital Copies on

CD ROM

MAXIMUM

PAGE LIMIT

Volume I

RFP Documents

TAB A – Signed Solicitation, Offer, and Award (SF 1442) and any Amendments

TAB B – Section K TAB C – Section

Transmittal Summary Letter

TAB D –

Responsibility Statement

TAB E – Bid Guarantee

TAB F– OCI

MS Word 2013 or earlier/Adobe

PDF

1 Original

1 PDF

None

Volume II

Mission Capability

TAB A –

Table of Contents

TAB B –

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

TAB C – List of Table and Drawings and/or cross reference matrix (if applicable)

TAB D –

Bonding Capacity

TAB E – JOC

Program Management Plan

TAB F – Quality Control Procedures

MS Word 2013 or earlier/Adobe

PDF

3 PDF

30 page count

Volume III

Price TAB A – ID/IQ Price

Proposal

MS Excel 2013; if narrative is included: MS word 2013 or earlier

1 (Protected and Unprotected Excel Price Matrix)

None

b. Proposal Limitation. The proposal shall not exceed the page limits identified above. If the page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit shall be removed and not considered in the evaluation. The Government will not accept any changes to the contractor’s proposal after the closing date of the solicitation (See FAR 15.208 for further information regarding late proposals). If discussions become necessary, page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors.

c. Page Limit Includes: All appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, drawings, etc. All

Appendices, Charts, Graphs, Diagrams, Tables, Photographs, Drawings or fold-outs used for charts or tables (8.5 x 14 fold-outs) will count as one (1) page; 11 x 17 foldouts are permissible up to 10 pages and are excluded from page count).

d. Page Limit does not include covers for volumes, tables of contents, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, and section dividers/tables if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. They will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

e. Page: A page shall be an 8 ½ X 11” sheet of paper. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Letter size and spacing requirements for illustrations and tables can be at the discretion of the offeror but must be easily readable. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and 3/4 inch side margins. All pages of each proposal shall be identified with the solicitation number W9124E-16-R-0002.

Printing shall be easily readable (Font: Times New Roman; Font Style: Regular: Size: 10 point on 8.5 x 11 inch paper.) The Contractor shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. In the event contractor creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

f. Indexing. Each volume shall contain a detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.

g. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

h. All pricing spreadsheet documents shall be in Microsoft Excel. Spreadsheets will not contain hidden worksheets. All formulas, lookup tables, and links shall be intact, and no links shall exist to files not included with the submission. PDF or flat files will not be considered adequate.

L.3.3. Proposal Content.

a. Volume I – RFP Documents. Part I must be clearly marked “VOLUME I - RFP DOCUMENTS, RFP W9124E-16-R-0002.” Offerors are required to submit a completed SF 1442 (including acknowledgment of Amendments), Section K, Transmittal Summary Letter, Exceptions/Assumptions, Financial Statements, and Offer Bond. Failure to follow the below RFP Document Proposal preparation instructions may cause your proposal to be determined unacceptable by the Government. The RFP Documents Volume shall be organized as follows and contain the identified information.

(1) TAB A - SF 1442. The SF 1442 shall be submitted fully completed. The offeror is cautioned that the

SF 1442 shall contain an original signature in block 30B of the form. Acknowledgment of amendments can be made on the face of the SF 1442 in block 19 or signed copies of the amendments can be included in this Section.

(2) TAB B - Section K (Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors). The offeror shall ensure that Section K is submitted with all blocks in each certification/representation completed truthfully and completely.

(3) TAB C - Transmittal Summary Letter. A summary cover letter to the proposal shall provide the following: (1) the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contact, who is authorized to make decisions with respect to the proposal and obligate the company contractually, (2) Identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government, (3) A list of the proposal package contents, and (4) A listing of subcontractors and/or teaming partners that the offeror historically uses when involved in contracts of this type or magnitude.

(4) TAB D – Responsibility Statement. The Offeror shall submit a statement of their responsibility and its latest financial statements, in accordance with FAR 9.104-1. This will be used in the Government’s determination of responsibility for the Offeror.

(5) TAB E - Proper Offer Guarantee (offer bond). The offeror shall submit a bid guarantee in accordance with FAR 52.228-1. The bid guarantee amount shall be at least 20% of the bid price but not exceed $3 million.

(6) TAB F – Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan (if applicable). Offerors shall submit a Mitigation Plan, if required, to satisfy the requirements of FAR 9.5 “Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest”. Potential OCI conflicts that may exist include Unequal Access to Information, Biased Ground Rules, and Impaired Objectivity. The OCI Mitigation Plan shall include a description of the actual or potential OCI, a description of the action that the responder has taken or proposes to take to avoid, mitigate, or neutralize the conflict, and any other relevant information that would assist the Contracting Officer in determining whether the Mitigation Plan is in fact acceptable or unacceptable.

The Contracting Officer will review any mitigation plans submitted in response to this Request for

Proposal before the proposal is evaluated or considered for award. The Contracting Officer will determine whether there is an OCI issue based on the information submitted and if the mitigation plan resolved any OCI concerns. If the Contracting Officer determines that there is an OCI issue and that it cannot be mitigated, the Contracting Officer will inform the Offeror that the proposal will not be evaluated or considered for award. The Contracting Officer and Offeror must resolve any OCI issues prior to the evaluation and consideration for award.

b. Volume II – Mission Capability Proposal. Part II must be clearly marked “VOLUME II – MISSION

CAPABILITY PROPOSAL, RFP W9124E-16-R-0002.”

(1) General. The Mission Capability Volume shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. Responses will be evaluated against the factors defined in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award.

The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the SOW (including referenced publications, technical data, etc.); statements paraphrasing the SOW or parts thereof (including applicable publications, technical data, etc.); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used,” etc., will be considered

W91247-15-R-0004 unacceptable. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience.

The Government will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

(2) The Mission Capability Volume shall, at a minimum, be prepared in a form consistent with the SOW and the evaluation criteria for award set forth in Section M of this solicitation. The section shall be prepared in an orderly format and in sufficient detail to enable the Government to make a thorough evaluation of the contractor’s technical competence, and ability to comply with the contract job requirements specified in the SOW. The offeror shall address as specifically as possible the actual methodology to be used for accomplishing the SOW requirements. The volume shall include a table of contents, a list of table(s) and drawings (if applicable), and cross reference matrix (if applicable).

(3) The offeror shall provide the following:

(a) TAB A, Table of Contents

(b) TAB B, Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

(c) TAB C, List of Tables and Drawings and/or cross reference matrix (if applicable)

(d) TAB D, Element 1: Bonding Capacity. Information showing minimum available bonding capacity of

$15M aggregate ($5M per year) with verification from the Securities or Bonding Company. The information shall include how long the Surety Company has provided bonding for the Contractor and the bonding limit for a single project, aggregate amount, and current available bonding.

(e) TAB E, Element 2: JOC Program Management Plan: For this element the offeror shall submit a

Management Plan for successful execution of the contract. The management plan shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(f) TAB E, Element 2: JOC Program Management Plan: For this element the offeror shall submit a

Management Plan for successful execution of the contract. The management plan shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(i) The Management Plan will detail how the Offeror will manage and maintain a comprehensive subcontractor base. The plan must also address the offeror’s capability to recruit and retain qualified, licensed, certified, and trained subcontractors throughout the duration of the contract.

(ii) The Management Plan will detail how the Offeror will manage and maintain an “in-house” workforce, to perform the required percentage of in-house work in accordance with SOW 2.4.3. The plan must also address the Offeror’s capability to recruit and retain a qualified, licensed, certified and trained workforce throughout the duration of the contract.

(iii) The offeror shall demonstrate their understanding of and ability to manage multiple and concurrent task orders, and their ability to ramp-up for typical end of fiscal year workload and deadlines.

(g) TAB F, Element 3: Quality Control Plan. The Offeror shall provide their quality control which meets the requirements stated in SOW 2.6.3. Quality Control Plan.

(h) TAB G, Element 4: Staffing Approach in accordance with SOW 2.4.3 and Technical Exhibit 4. The

Offeror shall provide an organization chart which lists key personnel and in-house staff. The accompanying narrative shall illustrate that key personnel meet the required knowledge, skills, and experience listed at SOW

2.4.1. – 2.4.1.3.

c. Volume III – Price Proposal (Coefficients). Part III must be clearly marked “VOLUME III – PRICE

PROPOSAL, RFP W9124E-16-R-0002.”

(1) TAB A, ID/IQ Price Proposal: Price proposal shall consist of Schedule B plus all costs included in development of the coefficients. Schedule B shall be submitted fully completed and error free. It shall contain the offeror’s prices (coefficients) for the established format in Schedule B. Coefficient means a numerical factor that represents costs (generally indirect costs) not considered to be included in the UPB prices. The coefficients are proposed as a percentage (in decimal format) increase or decrease to the UPB prices. For example, a coefficient of

1.2 would result in an additional 20 percent to the listed unit price; 0.9 would result in a 10 percent decrease of the listed prices, and 1.00 would leave the unit price as the proposed unit price. The offeror shall limit the Coefficients to two decimal places. The offeror shall propose Base Year and Option Year Coefficients. All components of price shall be included in the offeror’s coefficient, and shall be fully supported as no allowance for omitted cost will be made later. The offeror’s Coefficients shall be all inclusive and shall include, but not be limited to, the following costs:

General and Administrative and other Overhead Profit and risk Bond premiums Social security contributions Insurance Costs Employee Payroll Taxes Insurance and Fringe Benefits Subcontractors’ Overhead and Profit Business Taxes, contributions, and memberships Mobilization and demobilization costs Site cleanup Labor adjustments between the Gordian Unit Price Book given labor rates and the current Davis/Bacon

Labor Rates

Supervision

Quality control

Transportation of contractor’s personnel to, from, and within the job site

Shipping of all materials to the jobsite

Lodging and per-diem

Adjustment factors to account for small jobs

Incidental tools and equipment

Submittals

Job Order preparation costs

Any markups for materials and all contingencies

Corporate Headquarters support (legal, financial, etc.)

Waste and excess material

Sales tax on material and equipment costs

Compliance with EPA/OSHA regulations and protection and safety laws

(2) TAB B: The offeror shall include a detail of the coefficients obtained from TAB A and provide the following worksheet for TAB B. Bid guarantee calculations should derive from this section.

Estimated maximum contract value

(per year)

Geographic Distribution

Pre-priced Coefficient (Base-Year)

Offered

0001AA

$5,000,000 x .6822 = 3,411,000 x =

0001AB

$5,000,000 x .0530 = 265,000 x

0001AC

$5,000,000 x .0328 = 164,000 x

0001AD

$5,000,000 x .0329 = 164,500 x

0001AE

$5,000,000 x .0247 = 123,500 x

0001AF

$5,000,000 x .0499 = 249,500 x

0001A G

$5,000,000 x .0335 = 167,500 x

H

$5,000,000 x .0332 = 166,000 x

0001AJ

$5,000,000 x .0333 = 166,500 x

K

$5,000,000 x .0117 = 58,500 x

0001AL

$5,000,000 x .0129 = 64,500 x

Total Price for base year $

(per year)

Geographic Distribution

Pre-priced Coefficient

(Option 1 )

1001AA

1001AB

1001AC

$5,000,000 x .0328 = 164,000 x

1001AD

1001AE $5,000,000 x .0247 = 123,500 x = $

1001AF

1001A

1001AJ

1001AL

Total Price for Option Period 1 $

(per year)

Geographic Distribution

Pre-priced

(Option

Period 2 )

2001AA

2001AB

2001AC

$5,000,000 x .0328 = 164,000 x =

2001AD

2001AE

$5,000,000 x .0247 = 123,500 x

2001AF

2001A

2001AJ

2001AL

Total Price for Option Period 2 $

TOTAL PRICE

(base and all options)

(END INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1. Basis for Contract Award.

a. The source selection shall be conducted via a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) approach in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS). The government will award the contract to the LPTA offeror who is deemed responsible. For a proposal to be determined “Technically Acceptable” and receive consideration for award based upon low price submitted, the proposal must receive a rating of “Acceptable” for the mission capability factor. Failure to meet the criteria will render the proposal to be technically unacceptable and will not be considered for award.

b. Preliminary Screening. The contracting officer, or designated individual(s) will conduct a preliminary screening to determine if the proposal(s) have complied with the data submission prerequisites of Sections A, B, K and L. Failure to submit the required information may result in elimination of the proposal for award consideration.

c. The Government will evaluate responses strictly in accordance with this solicitation and will not assume that performance will include areas not specified in the Contractor's submission.

M.2. Award. The Government intends to award a single contract as a result of this solicitation. Offers received for less than the stated number of coefficients listed in the Schedule B will be considered ineligible for award. As set forth in FAR 52.215-1 (f)(4), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a), Clarifications and award without discussions). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal shall contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In the event that discussions are held, a competitive range determination will be made.

M.2.1. Evaluation Criteria. The Government will use the criteria set forth below in the evaluation and selection of offers for award. Each offeror must submit a proposal that completely addresses all of the requirements listed in Section L of the RFP and must demonstrate how each requirement will be satisfied. Cursory responses or responses which merely reiterate or reformulate Section L, the SOW or technical specifications, or the solicitation will not be considered “Acceptable” as satisfying the requirements of the RFP or as demonstrating the ability to perform the jobs outlined in the solicitation.

a. Factor 1 – Mission Capability. The Government technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, assigning ratings of Acceptable or Unacceptable (defined below).

The Government will evaluate offeror’s methods and approach to meeting the (1) Bonding Capacity, (2) JOC Program Management Approach, (3) Quality Control Procedures and (4) Staffing Approach, to determine Technical Acceptability. The offeror’s technical proposal will receive one (1) of the adjectival ratings defined below.

ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

To be considered technically acceptable, offerors must demonstrate the capability to provide the elements set forth below as required by the solicitation. Technical Acceptability will be based on the following:

(1) Element 1: Bonding Capacity. To be considered technically acceptable, the offeror’s bonding capacity shall show that the offeror has the capability to obtain from a Securities or Bonding Company a minimum available bonding capacity of $15M aggregate ($5M per year).

(2) Element 2: JOC Program Management Approach. To be considered technically acceptable, the JOC Program Management Approach must meet the following:

(a) The Management Plan demonstrates that the Offeror can successfully manage and maintain a comprehensive subcontractor base. The plan illustrated that the offeror is capable of recruiting and retaining qualified, licensed, certified, and trained subcontractors throughout the duration of the contract.

(b) The Management Plan demonstrates the offeror can successfully manage and maintain an “in-house” workforce, to perform the required percentage of in-house work as defined in the SOW 2.4.3. The plan illustrated that the offeror is capable of recruiting and retaining a qualified, licensed, certified, and trained workforce throughout the duration of the contract.

(c) The offeror’s Management Plan demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of and ability to manage multiple and concurrent task orders, and their ability to ramp up for typical end of fiscal year workload and deadlines.

(3) Element 3: Quality Control Plan – The offeror’s quality control plan meets the requirements stated in SOW 2.6.3. Quality Control Plan.

(4) Element 4: Staffing Approach. The Offeror provided an organization chart which listed key personnel and adequate in-house staff as defined in the SOW 2.4.3 Attachment 3. The narrative provided illustrated that the key personnel meet the required knowledge, skills, and experience listed at SOW 2.4.1 – 2.4.1.3.

b. Factor 2 – Price (Coefficients). Price will not be scored or rated. The price analysis techniques and procedures described under FAR Part 15.404-1(b) will be the primary means of assessing whether the price submission is reasonable, complete and balanced. The Government will evaluate all offers for award purposes by multiplying the offered coefficients by $5M for each year (three year total) to determine the offered price of each offeror.

Additionally, as part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (see FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding one-half of the Offeror's final option period price to the Offeror's total price. Thus, the Offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period, 1st option, 2nd option, and 1/2 of the 2nd option. Offerors are not required to enter a price for the six-month period. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Also, the Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the prices are significantly unbalanced, as defined under FAR 15.404-1 (g).

Definitions:

Completeness/Accuracy: The Offeror’s proposal is in compliance with the Price Volume instructions is mathematically accurate.”

Reasonableness: A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

Unbalanced: Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques.

Example Evaluation of Coefficients:

FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY

ITEM DESCRIPTION

Estimated

Percentage of Work

EXAMPLE

PRE-PRICED

COEFFICIENT

0001 BASE YEAR ORDERING PERIOD

0001AA NORMAL WORKING HOURS – FORT POLK

68.22% 1.10

0001AB NORMAL WORKING HOURS – MEDICAL

FACILITIES AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT

5.30% 1.13

0001AC NORMAL WORKING HOURS – TOLEDO BEND

AND PEASON RIDGE

3.28% 1.15

0001AD NORMAL WORKING HOURS – CONTROLLED

AREAS

3.29% 1.16

0001AE NORMAL WORKING HOURS – INTERMEDIATE

STAGING BASE

2.47% 1.18

0001AF OTHER THAN NORMAL WORKING HOURS –

FORT POLK

4.99% 1.15

0001AG OTHER THAN NORMAL WORKING HOURS –

MEDICAL FACILITIES AND CHILD

DEVELOPMENT

3.35% 1.18

0001AH OTHER THAN NORMAL WORKING HOURS –

TOLEDO BEND AND PEASON RIDGE

3.32% 1.15

0001AJ OTHER THAN NORMAL WORKING HOURS –

CONTROLLED AREAS

3.33% 1.19

0001AK OTHER THAN NORMAL WORKING HOURS –

INTERMEDIATE STAGING BASE

1.17% 1.19

0001AL NON PRE-PRICED COEFFCIENT

1.29% 1.20 contract value (per year)

Geographic Distribution

*EXAMPLE*

Prepriced

Evaluated

0001AA $5,000,000 x .6822 = 3,411,000 x 1.10 = $3,752,100

0001AB $5,000,000 x .0530 = 265,000 x 1.13 = $299,450

0001AC $5,000,000 x .0328 = 164,000 x 1.15 = $188,600

0001AD $5,000,000 x .0329 = 164,500 x 1.16 = $190,820

0001AE $5,000,000 x .0247 = 123,500 x 1.18 = $145,730

0001AF $5,000,000 x .0499 = 249,500 x 1.15 = $286,925

0001AG $5,000,000 x .0335 = 167,500 x 1.18 = $197,650

0001AH $5,000,000 x .0332 = 166,000 x 1.15 = $190,900

0001AJ $5,000,000 x .0333 = 166,500 x 1.19 = $198,135

0001AK $5,000,000 x .0117 = 58,500 x 1.19 = $69,615

0001AL $5,000,000 x .0129 = 64,500 x 1.20 = $77,400

Total Overall Evaluated Price for 1 year $5,597,325

(END EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD)

(End of Summary of Changes)