PAN 038049 W911SD-26-Q-A044 PAST PERFORMANCE Questionnaire DAS Modernization Phs 1.pdf

RFI BATCH # 3 (AMEND 0001)

1. L.6.1.3, Table 2 – Page Limitations, pg. 64

Table 2 specifies that one (1) CD ROM is required for the digital submission of each volume (Volumes I–IV). Would the Government consider allowing offerors to consolidate all four digital volumes onto a single CD ROM, with each volume clearly labeled in separate folders, rather than requiring four individual CD

ROMs?

Answer: 1 CD ROM is acceptable, and One (1) binder is also acceptable so long as the digital copy is on a CD ROM

2. L.6.1.3, Table 2 – Page Limitations, pg. 64

Will the Government please confirm that cover pages, and tables of contents are excluded from the page limitations for the technical and past performance volume?

Answer: That’s fine

3. Reference: Solicitation page 12/69; paragraph C2.1.3

“The following Spectrum Requirements support the objective of this requirement.

Table 3 Spectrum Requirements (end of paragraph)”

Question: Table 3 does not appear in the Solicitation; however, there is a Table 3 with frequencies in the PWS. Should the reader refer to Table 3 on page 8/68 in the PWS?

Answer: It is the offeror’s responsibility to review all attached documents posted in the SAM.gov solicitation

4. Reference: Solicitation 64/69; Page limitations in Table 2

Page Limit for Volume III, Past Performance, is “20 (does not include questionnaire responses)”

Question: Could the Government provide additional information about the desired questionnaires?

Answer: Will upload past performance questionnaire into SAM

5. Reference: RFQ page 9/69, paragraph C1.9, Contractor Travel

“Reserved”

Question: Will the Government permit quoters to include the cost of travel within the terms of its GSA Contract and the Joint Travel Regulation?

Answer: Only quote what is requested in the solicitation

Past Performance Questionnaire See below

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Quote

(RFQ) W911SD-26-Q-A044

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army West Point Contracting Office is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the:

US Army

United State Military Academy (USMA)

681 Roger Place Suite 100

West Point, New York 10996

(insert Contracting Office and address), no later than 15 days after receipt of request or

(insert date), whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to ignacio.j.cordova2.civ@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

*Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to

Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this

Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________

Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.