20191108_W911SD-19-R-0039_RFIs_V2.pdf

RFI Response – Laundry Services, West Point, NY

W911SD‐19‐R‐0039

Questions from Amendment 03 RFIs Patricia Sullivan, Donna Pletcher – Pruiss, Robert Rapp

1. The Original Question number 7 in the RFI Response stated:

Question: It appears The Government is asking contractors to address each part of the PWS and how the contractor intents to perform them. A cross reference matrix for this is even required. However there doesn’t appear to be a space for this in the Volume general outline.

• Where in Technical Volume does the Government want the response to the

PWS?

All technical capabilities should be addressed in Volume II – Technical Capabilities as stated in “Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors”

Follow up Question 11/7/19: Taking in to consideration the Governments answer above. There is not a place in the Technical Capability Volume general outline or Elements where the Response to the contract task requirements specified in the PWS fits.

Will the Government please provide which specific section or element where the offeror should insert this part of the proposal? Please reference the required four elements listed under Volume II – Technical Capabilities. The verbiage in paragraph (1) of the Technical capabilities is used to ensure the Offerors meaningful detail in their submission. Offerors are only required to respond to the four elements listed in the section.

If it is helpful historical RFP’s have had the element called Mission Capability - Each task area must be addressed separately to include staffing (skill mix) and any deliverables associated with the specific tasks. The Mission Capability section shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their company and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offerors proposal.

2. Question 16 in the RFI was asking if there was a Wage Determination or a CBA.

The current workforce is all under a Collective Bargaining Agreement which stipulates the wages and benefits. This CBA is the Wage determination for this contract. See Amendment 0004.

Question: So that all offerors know the appropriate wages and benefits for the labor force will the government please provide a copy of the current CBA?

As Corrected, The CBA is the Wage Determination for the current contract W911SD-14-C-0006. This Solicitation will use Wage Determination

RFI Response – Laundry Services, West Point, NY

W911SD‐19‐R‐0039

Questions from Amendment 03 RFIs Patricia Sullivan, Donna Pletcher – Pruiss, Robert Rapp

3. Question number 201 in the RFI stated:

21. Maintenance shop tools owned by the government or the contactor? Refer to Technical Exhibit #4 for a list of government owned equipment. Any tools not listed, are contractor owned.

Currently all shop tools are owned by the contractor NOT the government.

4. Question Number 28 in the RFI stated:

28. How many employees working at CLADS Office? The number of employees (staffing levels) needed to satisfy contract requirements shall be determined by the contractor.

The number of people government provided is not accurate an accurate number.

The Staffing should be determined by the offeror in order to accommodate the PWS requirements in PARA 5.8.4.7 which States: Average Cadet wait time at CLADs shall not exceed 10 minutes.