20191114_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 176 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Laundry and Dry Cleaning Services , West Point Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911SD19R0039
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of contractor performance on a previous federal government contract. It requests information on the contract such as description of services provided, initial and final costs, reasons for cost differences, customer information and ratings of the contractor's technical performance, program management, transition and employee retention. Narrative evaluations are also solicited. The questionnaire aims to collect input for consideration in future contract award decisions.
A related federal contract opportunity involves soliciting capability statements from small businesses for provision of laundry and dry cleaning services at the United States Military Academy at West Point. Services required include cleaning and pressing textiles, garments and linens for cadets and other personnel. Responses are requested by March 15th, 2020 to determine contractor qualifications and interest in a small business set-aside. The anticipated NAICS code is 812332 for industrial laundering.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: _______________________________________________________________________________
B. Cage Code: _________________________________
C. Contract number: _______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
J. Description of service provided: ______________________________________________________________
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title:
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:
D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
US UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
Technical Performance S M US NA
T1. Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts
T3. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts
T4. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5. Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
Program Management S M US NA
P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management
P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
Transition/phase-in S M US NA
T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
Employee Retention/Attraction S M US NA
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes____ Default____ Convenience____ Pending Terminations____ No ____ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address: 681 Hardee Pl, West
Point, NY 10996
ATTN: Lakenia Brown
Or FAX/E-mail to:
Lakenia.M.Brown.civ@mail.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .