Attachment 2 - Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire.DOC

DOC document 36 KB Posted

Attached to
Enterprise Multimedia Center Army Support Services Five Year Contract - Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911S024R0003
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire that will be used to evaluate past performance for a federal contract opportunity. The questionnaire requests the offeror's representative to provide candid responses on the contractor's past performance in areas such as compliance with requirements, project management effectiveness, timeliness of deliverables, cost control (if applicable), and customer satisfaction. The evaluations use a rating scale of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory, with the respondent required to provide rationale for each rating. The questionnaire is to be returned by 17 April 2024 at 3:00 PM ET to the designated Contracting Specialist and Contracting Officer.

The related federal contract opportunity is Solicitation W911S024R0003 for the Enterprise Multimedia Center Army Support Services Five Year Contract, which is an 8(a) set-aside requirement issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis. All questions on the solicitation are due by 7 March 2024 at 2 PM EDT.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Enterprise Multimedia Center Army Support Services Five Year Contract - Solicitation, newest first.
File Type Posted
EMC Solicitation Questions and Answers 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EMC Pricing Worksheet Attachment 3 041024.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911S024R0003 EMC Amendment 4.pdf PDF
W911S024R0003 EMC Amendment 4 Conformed Copy.pdf PDF
W911S024R0003 EMC SF 1449 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
Attachment E After Action Review (AAR) Template.pdf PDF
EMC Solicitation Questions and Answers_ Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - Past Performance Reference Sheet.docx DOCX document
W911S024R0003 EMC SF 1449 Amendment 2 Conformed_040324.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Performance Work Statement EMC.pdf PDF
EUSTIS-SC-24-001 - DD 254 (1).pdf PDF
EMC Pricing Worksheet Attachment 3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911S024R0003 EMC SF 1449_Amendment 2_040324.pdf PDF
EUSTIS-SC-24-001 - DD 254 CONTINUATION Attachment 4B.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
W911S024R0003 A00001.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Past Performance Reference Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 - Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
W911S024R0003_02292024.pdf PDF
EUSTIS-24-SC-001 - PWS Attachment 5.pdf PDF
Materials CLIN List Section 7.5 Attachment E EMC.pdf PDF
EUSTIS-SC-24-001 - DD 254 CONTINUATION Attachment 4B.pdf PDF
W911S024R0003_02292024.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
EUSTIS-SC-24-001 - DD 254 Attachment 4A.pdf PDF
EMC Pricing Worksheet Attachment 3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - Past Performance Reference Sheet.docx DOCX document
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the award of a federal contract action. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Government’s POCs identified below by 17 April 2024 at 3:00 PM Eastern Time (ET).

Contract Specialist: Jared Maunz, jared.b.maunz.civ@army.mil
Contracting Officer: Benjamin Cady, benjamin.m.cady.civ@army.mil

Rating Definitions:

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor was highly effective.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance eof the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious probme for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Offeror’s Past Performance Reference POC – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Exceptional

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Government’s POCs identified above.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .