RRAD_MATOC_RFP_Questions(2nd_Wave).pdf

Question Number

Document Question/Comments Answer/Response Date Received

Date Posted

1 Solicitation On Attachment_001, the pricing matrix, most of the items are pretty straight forward. However, the welder is not. It makes a difference if the welder is welding pipe or structure steel. Can you please explain what is expected to be inputted as the base and fringe rate?

After review of the Davis Bacon Act (DBA), there is not a minimum wage and fringe that must be paid to welders. Because the "Welders" category represent only 1% or 1200 hours out of 120,000 hours included in the attachment, I would advise all offerors to price its proposed welders to capture a mix of potential welder positions.

8/10/2018 8/22/2018

2 Solicitation Starting on page 6 through page 14 there are various different reports called out.

Are these reports expected to be submitted with the proposal?

These reports are not to be submitted with a proposal. However, these Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) reports shall be reviewed and submitted at the individual Task Order level.

8/10/2018 8/22/2018

3 Solicitation On pages 55‐65 there are several blanks to be filled in. Is this to be part of our proposal?

Yes, the blanks have to be filled in. 8/10/2018 8/22/2018

4 Solicitation On pages 73‐76 there is mention of a letter of credit. Are we to submit a letter of credit as part of our proposal? If not, is bid bond required in place of the letter?

The offeror may use a 52.228‐14 Irrevocable Letter of Credit (ILC), in lieu of a bid bond or to secure other types of bonds such as performance and payment bonds. The ILC is available as an alternative to a construction bond.

8/10/2018 8/22/2018

5 Solicitation Are there drawings on this project? No 8/14/2018 8/22/2018

6 Solicitation I have a job currently through the MATOC procurement at RRAD that has been completed (original scope of work). The project is not closed out due to a change order that has been held up for months in legal and admin departments. Could I use that project as a past performance even though the project has not been closed out and there is a MOD in waiting?

Please refer to Section L.4.1.1, L.4.1.2, L.4.1.3.4 of the RFP. 8/17/2018 8/22/2018

RRAD MATOC

W911RQ‐18‐R‐0267

Question and Answer Tracker

Document Question/Comments Answer/Response Date Received

Date Posted

7 Solicitation We are a General Contractor in the processing of completing our renewed 5 year Contract Application. Can you please provide us with direction as to who will fill out the Past Performance Questionnaire for us?

Please refer to Section L.4.1.3.4 8/21/2018 8/22/2018

8 Solicitation To determine relevant projects can you please tell us what the $ minimum and $ maximum amount the task orders are anticipated to be? SEE AMENDMENT 0002. The overall contract minimum ($3,000) and maximum ($96.65M) has been added to the Executive Summary in the RFP. Additionally, 52.216‐19 Order Limitations has been added to provide Task Order minimums and maximums.

8/24/2018 8/30/2018

9 Solicitation Please confirm the total $ magnitude for the MATOC is $10M The contract minimum ($3,000) and maximum ($96.65M) are now included in the RFP.

8/24/2018 8/30/2018

10 Solicitation Are there any page limits on the 3 Volumes? If yes, what are they?

No 8/24/2018 8/30/2018

11 Solicitation

If we have completed CPARS, can we include them in the back of Volume I?

OFFERORS ARE NOT INSTRUCTED TO INCLUDE CPARS IN THEIR PROPOSAL

SUBMITTAL

8/24/2018 8/30/2018

12 Solicitation Can you please provide me the magnitude of this MATOC for the total program ..ex NTE 30,000,000 over the life of contract ?

The contract minimum ($3,000) and maximum ($96.65M) are now included in the RFP.

8/24/2018 8/30/2018

13 Solicitation Can you please provide me the maximum task order price that will be awarded in this program? See clause 52.216‐19, referenced in answer 8.

8/24/2018 8/30/2018

14 Solicitation Can you please provide the required staffing for a awarded task order ‐ex dedicated superintendent, qc, safety ..ect ..

We don’t have any required staffing levels. If required, they would be included in each specific Task Order.

8/24/2018 8/30/2018

15 Solicitation On page 9 of 17 of the RFP, L.4.1.3 Past Performance (m) states, "Copies of the Statements of Work from each of the submitted contracts to establish the relevance of the contract to the scope of work activities listed in L.4.1.2 above." In cases were the Statements of Work were vaguely stated or incomplete, may we include relevant information from the government's project specifications and/or drawings to illustrate relevance?

SEE AMENDMENT 002. SECTION L.4.1.3 (M) HAS BEEN AMENDED TO SAY

" COPIES OF THE STATEMENTS OF WORK FROM EACH OF THE SUBMITTED

CONTRACTS TO ESTABLISH THE RELEVANCE OF THE CONTRACT TO THE

SCOPE OF WORK ACTIVITIES LISTED IN L.4.1.2 ABOVE. IN ADDITION TO

THE COMPLETE STATEMENT OF WORK, THE OFFEROR MAY PROVIDE

SUBSTANTIATING DATA (I.E. DRAWINGS) TO SUPPORT THE STATEMENT

OF WORK.

8/24/2018 8/30/2018

Document Question/Comments Answer/Response Date Received

Date Posted

16 Solicitation Per Section L.4.1.3, paragraph M, offerors must provide "Copies of the Statements of Work from each of the submitted contracts to establish the relevance of the contract to the scope of work activities listed in L.4.1.2 above." As it is commonplace for Federal contracts to include sizable Statements of Work (SOW), we respectfully request that offerors be allowed to provide excerpts of SOW's as appropriate in place of entire SOW's. For example, one of our submitted contracts has an SOW of more than 1120 pages. If we are able to provide pages with relevant excerpts only, the SOW page count is reduced to just 11 pages. This will increase the ease of locating information and ease of transmission.

FOR ALL STATEMENTS OF WORK SUBMITTED, L.4.1.3 (J) STATES " IN ITS

DESCRIPTION, THE OFFEROR SHOULD SPECIFY THE LOCATION IN THE

PROPOSAL (TO INCLUDE FILENAME OR DOCUMENT REFERENCE WITH

PAGE AND PARAGRAPH OF THE PAST CONTRACT INFORMATION) THAT

SUBSTANTIATES THE RELEVANCE; "

8/27/2018 8/30/2018

17 Solicitation May we include Final CPAR evaluations to address item (l) "self‐assessment of contract performance" under L.4.1.3? No, CPARS IS A GOVERNMENT ASSESSMENT.

8/22/2018 8/30/2018

18 Solicitation Can Final CPAR evaluations be provide in lieu of Past Performance Questionnaires?

No

8/22/2018 8/30/2018

19 Solicitation Is there a page limit associated with the Past Performance Volume? No 8/22/2018 8/30/2018 20 Solicitation I see the requirements regarding final performance and payment bonds within 10 days if awarded, but I am not finding the bid bond requirements and Standard Form 24 or Bid Guarantee provision of the solicitation required for the proposal.

Please advise if I have overlooked the bid bond requirement included in this solicitation proposal or is the bid bond a future requirement per task order if awarded a MATOC Contract?

These subject requirements are required within 10 days of Task Order award. The bid bond is a future requirement per task order if awarded a MATOC contract.

8/27/2018 8/30/2018

21 Solicitation The solicitation calls for Payment/Performance bonds within 10 days after being award the project. However, [13.B] In the solicitation form does not indicate whether or not a bid bond is required at this time and I can't find any indication within the RFP. I would just like to verify whether one is needed? And If so, at what percent of the amount?

The bid bond is a future requirement per task order if awarded a MATOC contract.

8/27/2018 8/30/2018

22 Solicitation L.1.2.1 States that the Government minimum acceptance period is 180 calendar days ‐ yet the SF 1442 says 90 days in box 13.D. Please clarify if we are to fill in 180 or 90 in box 17 on the SF 1442 Back Page

SEE AMENDMENT 0002. SECTION L TAKES PRECEDENT OVER BOX 17 OF

THE SF 1442, but BOX 17 HAS BEEN CHANGED TO 180 CALENDAR DAYS.

8/24/2018 8/30/2018

Document Question/Comments Answer/Response Date Received

Date Posted

23 Solicitation Our bonding company does not feel that a bid bond is required at this stage of the solicitation. Is it possible that the bid bond and / or irrevocable letter of credit that are referenced in the specifications apply to future, individual task orders once the contract is awarded? If a bid bond is required, we would need additional information regarding assumed contract value, bid bond percentage and the proper form to use. If a bid bond is required, (1) what contract value should be used / assumed, (2) what bid bond percentage (i.e. 5%, 20%, etc.) is required and

(3) which bid bond form do we use?

Correct, the bid bond and / or irrevocable letter of credit that are referenced in the specifications apply to future, individual task orders once the contract is awarded.

8/28/2018 8/30/2018