202008_MCD Virtual Industry Day Slides.pptx
PPTX presentation 25 MB Posted
- Attached to
- CHL023 Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911KB21R0001
About this file
This document provides details regarding a sources sought announcement for the Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification project. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Alaska District is seeking information from firms capable of constructing a 4.5 mile mix-in-place barrier wall between 56 to 66.5 feet below the crest of Moose Creek Dam's embankment. Interested firms should have experience as a prime contractor on similar civil engineering projects valued between $100 million and $250 million. Responses are due no later than September 10, 2019 and should include information on the firm's qualifications and capabilities, bonding limits, and completed questionnaire. The work will be completed under NAICS code 237990 with a small business size standard of $36.5 million.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Industry Questions - 20200827 Moose Creek Dam Mod TRACK CHANGES.docx | DOCX document | |
| Dwgs CHL023 20200810 Without Exploration Logs Part 4 of 5.pdf | ||
| Dwgs CHL023 20200810 Without Exploration Logs Part 1 of 5.pdf | ||
| Dwgs CHL023 20200810 Without Exploration Logs Part 3 of 5.pdf | ||
| MCD Industry Day Sign In Sheet 8-20-2020.pdf | ||
| Dwgs CHL023 20200810 Without Exploration Logs Part 5 of 5.pdf | ||
| Dwgs CHL023 20200810 Without Exploration Logs Part 2 of 5.pdf | ||
| Industry Day Meeting Area (20 Aug 2020).pdf | ||
| MCD Industry Day Information(CT Edit).pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Moose_Creek_Dam_Mod_Industry_Day_Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Moose_Creek_Mix_Design_Report_FINAL.pdf | ||
| 201907_MCD_Sources_Sought_Information.pdf | ||
| CHL023_Moose_Creek_Dam_Sources_Sought_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification Chena river Lakes Flood Control project Alaska District - CEPOA
Virtual Industry Day
Alaska District 17 August 2020
“The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.”
Agenda
Contracting
Small Business
Project Overview (Project Manager/Lead Engineer)
Closing
Contracting Points of Contact Contract Specialists
| John McComas (John.L.Mccomas@usace.army.mil) |
| Christine Dale (Christine.A.Dale@usace.army.mil) |
Contracting Officer Theresa Afrank (Theresa.M.Afrank@usace.army.mil)
Mailing Address
| U.S. Army Corps of Engineers |
| Alaska District |
| POA-CT, RM 30 |
| PO Box 6898 |
| JBER, AK 99506-0898 |
DISCLAIMERS
Questions regarding the August 2020 industry day or any material presented shall be submitted through ProjNet (See next slide for instructions)
| - Questions will not be answered today | |
| - The Government reserves the right to not answer questions should they chose to do so | |
| - Today’s slides were posted to beta.sam.gov and all questions/answers will be posted to | https://beta.sam.gov once all answers are consolidated |
The information being presented today is draft/preliminary information for the Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification and is subject to change. No offers or proposals will be accepted at this time.
Once the formal solicitation is issued, the solicitation shall be reviewed in its entirety as changes may/will occur from the information presented today till the formal solicitation is released.
Any information presented today does not commit the Government to any particular Contracting means/methods as formal reviews and approvals will direct the acquisition.
Contracting
Instruction for contractor that already have an office and a vendor ID will go to:
https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?StrKornCob=HomePagePublic Click register Fill out appropriate information (will need vendor ID which is obtainable from the ProjNet POC for that Contractor) Sign in Search for project: (name, P2 number, title) for this project it is Moose Creek Dam Modification (may have to click unpinned if nothing is showing up) Add project Click on project Click key access and enter: SSX5V3-3JIR8C From there a new menu will pop up and allow them to enter comments
If they do not have an office on ProjNet. Email Deandra.L.Wood@usace.army.mil with a good POC to get in touch with so USACE-POA can create a new office in ProjNet, which the users will then be able to register under and follow steps above.
PROJNET INSTRUCTIONS
Contracting All information regarding this acquisition will be posted to https://beta.sam.gov (formally known as www.fbo.gov) once it is available for release.
Solicitation Number is W911KB21R0001 – FAR Part 15 Contracting by Negotiation
- Anticipating Best Value Tradeoff Source Selection
NAICS is 237990 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Small Business Size Standard $39.5 Million
Anticipated contract is FFP
Project Magnitude is between $100,000,000 and $250,000,000
Approved by SBA as Unrestricted Acquisition
| - Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be required |
| - Factor Related to Extent of Small Business Participation Commitment is anticipated |
Schedule Physical site visit is schedule for 20 August 2020 as stated in beta.sam.gov posting.
One-on-One briefing schedule is in works, once finished, WebEx notices will be sent out.
Tentative Schedule (Calendar Year)
| Second Industry Day | - | 3rd Quarter 2020 | ||
| Solicitation | - | 1st Quarter 2021 | ||
| Award | - | 3rd Quarter 2021 | ||
| Construction Complete | - | 3rd Quarter 2024 | ||
| Contract Closeout | - | 3rd Quarter 2025 |
No further industry day’s are scheduled. If a site visit is held as part of the solicitation, the details for that site visit will be published in the solicitation.
Solicitation and all amendments must be signed/acknowledged Contractors must have an active registration in https://beta.sam.gov and must not be debarred and/or suspended to be considered for award.
Site Visit 20 August 2020 Meeting Point has moved from Project Office parking lot to location identified below.
Hard Hat, Steel Toe Boots/Shoes, Reflective Vest, Hearing Protection, Safety Glasses are required. Active construction is going on near dam control works.
USACE-CEPOA Small Business Professional
| Kathy Kinnett |
| (907) 753-5557 |
| Kathy.J.Kinnett@usace.army.mil |
Alaska Procurement Technical Assistance Center https://ptacalaska.org/
| Anchorage: Jody King | |
| (907) 786-7270 | jlking8@alaska.edu |
| Fairbanks: Pierre Thompson | |
| (907) 456-7822 | pierre.thompson@aksbdc.org |
Small Business Contacts/Helpful links Procurement Center Representative (Alaska)
| Randy Miller |
| (907)229-6939 |
| Randall.Miller@sba.gov |
System for Award Management https://beta.sam.gov/
Small Business Administration www.sba.gov
Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification Chena river Lakes Flood Control project Steve Howard Project Manager
Coleman Chalup P.E.
Lead Engineer Dam Safety Program Manager
Robert Tedrick P.E.
Design Manager
Alaska District 17 August 2020
“The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.”
All information is subject to change once the project is out for bid.
This information represents a 65% design
Project Location
OPERATIONAL SCHEMATIC
Population at risk Operational schematic
Reaches
Project Office Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 4 Reach 5 Reach 6 Reach 7 Reach 8 Reach 9 Control Works/Chena River
FLOODWAY AND DAM
Control Works (1992 Pool of Record)
NEED TO UPDATE
Geology
Foundation is gravelly sand/sandy gravel that likely exceeds 1000 ft in thickness with a surficial blanket of silt.
The transition from sand and gravel to silt includes layers of sand and silty sand, including fine sand with Cu<3.
The sand and gravel includes gap graded and open work gravel lenses.
Sloughs from meanders and braids, as well as permafrost, complicate the near surface geology.
Chena River Tanana River
600 ft
MCD
SLOUGHS AND PERMAFROST LOCATIONS
Mapped Sloughs Mapped Permafrost
Capacitive-Coupled Resistivity (CCR) - 50 foot depth
Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) - 300 foot depth
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) - 50 foot depth
Embankment Design
Rock Fill
Geotechnical Investigation – USACE-CEPOA Centerline Boreholes
R3 R4 R5 R7 R6 R8 R9
89 borings for embankment and potential borrow sources 6,140 feet drilled Borings ranging from 15 to 130 feet deep Results Encountered permafrost Mix Design samples Better understanding of foundation conditions Encountered zones with cobbles Identified soil in potential borrow sources
Potential Failure modes
24 ft 40 to 80 ft
Silt Layer Coarse Sand and Gravel Layer
Pooling and Floodway from Chena River Stability Berm Upstream Water Stage <= 525 feet NAVD 88 Continuous Silty sand/fine sand Layer
Boils Boils Downstream – City of North Pole
Impervious silt blanket Moose Creek Dam During periods of high water stages in the Chena River, due to the silty sand and fine sand layer under the silt layer, three modes of failure can occur under the Moose Creek Dam: 1. backwards erosion and piping (horizontal exits), 2. backwards erosion and piping (vertical exits) and 3. contact erosion. These three modes of failure could act independently or together, eventually causing a failure in the dam, leading to flooding and potential risk of loss of life and damage to the cities of North Pole and Fairbanks, and other adjacent communities.
Horizontal Exit Vertical Exit Allowable Seepage Backwards erosion Potential Failure point Contact Erosion Piping
LEGEND
Potential Failure in Dam Fairbanks City of North Pole Backward Erosion and Piping with Vertical Exit Backward Erosion and Piping with Horizontal Exit Contract Erosion
PLAN (BARRIER WALL)
| Station | Wall Depth (feet) | Wall Elevation (NAVD88) | |||
| 240+00 | 61 | 470 | |||
| 284+00 | 285+00 | 61 | 63 | 470 | 468 |
| 285+00 | 335+00 | 63 | 468 | ||
| 335+00 | 336+00 | 63 | 67 | 468 | 464 |
| 336+00 | 406+00 | 67 | 464 | ||
| 407+00 | 484+00 | 61 | 470 | ||
| 484+00 | 493+00 | Transition to top of bedrock at north abutment |
Geotechnical Investigation – USACE-CEPOA Centerline Boreholes with Barrier Wall Extents
R3 R4 R5 R7 R6 R8 R9
Existing Crest
ALLOWABLE CREST HEIGHT REDUCTION
| Existing Crest (ft) | Allowable Crest Height Reduction (ft) | |||
| Crest Reduction | 0 | 5 | ||
| Working Platform Width | 23.5 | 34 | 51.5 | 61 |
| Min Distance from Drain | 8 | 8 |
No side casting of material to the upstream or downstream
North Abutment
Station 457+00 to 479+70
Looking South Looking North
Station 434+29 to 457+00
Station 411+59 to 434+29 control works tie-in
Barrier Wall (Control Works tie-in)
Barrier wall tied into sloped concrete wall Sheet pile Jet Grouting Mix-in-Place
Station 388+90 to 411+59
Station 366+19 to 388+90
Station 343+49 to 366+19
Low Point Drain
Station 320+79 to 343+49
Station 298+09 to 320+79
Station 252+70 to 275+39
Station 230+00 to 252+70
Powerline decommission
Looking West Looking East
Mix-in-place waste material placement
Improve East Cutoff Dike Access Road Improve Tree Laydown Area Surface
Proposed North Borrow Source
Proposed Peninsula Borrow Source & staging/laydown area
Proposed South Borrow Source
Haul Roads
Mix Design Findings To Date Bureau of Reclamation Design Standards No. 13: Embankment Design (Table 16.7.11-1)
| Dam Name | Cement Factor | |||||
| (lb/yd3) | Bentonite Content | |||||
| (% of cement) | W/C Ratio | Coarse/Fine Aggregate Ratio | 28-day UCS (lb/in2) | |||
| Island Copper Mine | 239 | 22 | 2.78 | 1.0 | 220 | |
| Wister Dam | 350 | 10 | 1.0 | 1.39 | 598 | |
| Meeks Cabin | 255 | 15 | 1.85 | 1.0 | 4151 | |
| 1Based on average for the mix shown. | ||||||
| Golder 2018 Mix Design (with Relief Well Water) |
FHWA Design Manual: Deep Mixing For Embankment and Foundation Support (Bench Scale Testing)
| Binder Factor | Cement Factor | ||||
| (lb/yd3) | Bentonite Content | ||||
| (% of cement) | W/C Ratio | Coarse/Fine Aggregate Ratio | 28-day UCS (lb/in2) | ||
| 10 (lb/ft3) (8.16) | 187 | 18.0 | 2.03 | 258 | |
| 20 (lb/ft3) (13.68) | 339 | 9.0 | 1.38 | 582 | |
| 25 (lb/ft3) (16.08) | 405 | 7.2 | 1.23 | 934 | |
| 30 (lb/ft3) (18.27) | 466 | 6.0 | 1.13 | 1199 | |
| 35 (lb/ft3) (20.29) | 521 | 5.1 | 1.06 | 1334 |
Bureau of Reclamation Used for comparison of Mix Design
FHWA
Used Bench Scale Testing to conduct Mix Design
Contractor will be required to perform their own Mix Designs after award of the contract.
Allowable Technology for Barrier Wall construction at moose creek dam Mix in place methods shall be utilized to mix the embankment and foundation materials with Bentonite and Portland Cement in order to construct a Barrier Wall through Moose Creek Dam.
Any methods that utilize a bentonite slurry trench to support the embankment while excavation of the barrier wall takes place will NOT be utilized at Moose Creek Dam. The potential loss of slurry could result in failure of the embankment into the excavation during construction due to highly pervious foundation materials.
8/14/2020
Proposed Construction Criteria/Constraints
| Specification | |
| Max Depth | 67 feet |
| Min Width | 24 inches |
| Length | 25,300 feet (4.5 Miles) |
| Max Permeability | 1E-06 cm/sec |
| Unconfined Compressive Strength | 10 day rolling average at 200 psi @ 28 days, nothing below 150 psi |
| Measure of Acceptance | |
| Verification Coring | Yes |
| Insitu Permeability Testing | Yes |
| Unconfined Compressive Strength | Yes |
| Permeability on Samples | Yes |
| Homogeneous and Continuity | Yes |
| Connections to Existing Structures | |
| Low Point Drain | Tie into Sheet Pile |
| Control Works | Tie into Control Works with Jet Grouting. No embedment into existing concrete. |
Closing Comments Questions should be submitted via ProjNet
These slides are posted to the industry day notification.
Questions/answers will be posted once all answers are consolidated.
Reminder: The Government reserves the right to not answer questions should they chose to do so.
image4.png image5.png image6.png image10.jpeg image11.jpeg image12.png image13.png image14.jpeg image15.jpeg image16.jpeg image17.jpeg image18.png image19.png image20.jpeg image21.png image22.png image23.png image24.png image25.png image26.jpeg image27.png image28.png image29.png image30.png image31.png image32.png image33.png image34.png image35.png image36.png image37.jpeg image38.jpeg image39.jpeg image40.jpeg image41.png image42.jpeg image43.jpeg image44.jpeg image45.jpeg image46.png image47.jpeg image48.jpeg image49.jpeg image50.png image51.jpeg image52.jpeg image53.jpeg image54.jpeg image55.jpeg image56.png image57.jpeg image58.jpeg image59.png image60.png image61.png image62.png image63.png image64.jpeg image65.jpeg image66.jpeg image67.jpeg image68.png image69.jpeg image70.jpeg image71.jpeg image72.png image73.jpeg image74.jpeg image75.jpeg image76.png image77.png image78.png image79.jpeg image80.jpeg image81.jpeg image82.jpeg image83.png image84.jpeg image85.jpeg image86.jpeg image87.jpeg image88.png image89.jpeg image90.jpeg image91.jpeg image92.png image93.jpeg image94.jpeg image95.jpeg image96.png image97.jpeg image98.jpeg image99.jpeg image100.jpeg image101.png image102.jpeg image103.jpeg image104.jpeg image105.jpeg image106.jpeg image107.jpeg image108.png image109.png image110.jpeg image111.jpeg image112.jpeg image113.jpeg image114.jpeg image115.png image116.jpeg image117.jpeg image118.jpeg image119.jpeg image120.png image121.jpeg image122.jpeg image123.jpeg image124.jpeg image125.jpeg image126.png image127.jpeg image128.jpeg image129.jpeg image130.jpeg image131.jpeg image132.png image133.jpeg image134.jpeg image135.jpeg image136.jpeg image137.jpeg image138.png image139.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image7.png image8.png image9.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .