202008_MCD Virtual Industry Day Slides.pptx

PPTX presentation 25 MB Posted

Attached to
CHL023 Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911KB21R0001
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Alaska

About this file

This document provides details regarding a sources sought announcement for the Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification project. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Alaska District is seeking information from firms capable of constructing a 4.5 mile mix-in-place barrier wall between 56 to 66.5 feet below the crest of Moose Creek Dam's embankment. Interested firms should have experience as a prime contractor on similar civil engineering projects valued between $100 million and $250 million. Responses are due no later than September 10, 2019 and should include information on the firm's qualifications and capabilities, bonding limits, and completed questionnaire. The work will be completed under NAICS code 237990 with a small business size standard of $36.5 million.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification Chena river Lakes Flood Control project Alaska District - CEPOA

Virtual Industry Day

Alaska District 17 August 2020

“The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.”

Agenda

Contracting

Small Business

Project Overview (Project Manager/Lead Engineer)

Closing

Contracting Points of Contact Contract Specialists

John McComas (John.L.Mccomas@usace.army.mil)
Christine Dale (Christine.A.Dale@usace.army.mil)

Contracting Officer Theresa Afrank (Theresa.M.Afrank@usace.army.mil)

Mailing Address

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Alaska District
POA-CT, RM 30
PO Box 6898
JBER, AK 99506-0898

DISCLAIMERS

Questions regarding the August 2020 industry day or any material presented shall be submitted through ProjNet (See next slide for instructions)

- Questions will not be answered today
- The Government reserves the right to not answer questions should they chose to do so
- Today’s slides were posted to beta.sam.gov and all questions/answers will be posted tohttps://beta.sam.gov once all answers are consolidated

The information being presented today is draft/preliminary information for the Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification and is subject to change. No offers or proposals will be accepted at this time.

Once the formal solicitation is issued, the solicitation shall be reviewed in its entirety as changes may/will occur from the information presented today till the formal solicitation is released.

Any information presented today does not commit the Government to any particular Contracting means/methods as formal reviews and approvals will direct the acquisition.

Contracting

Instruction for contractor that already have an office and a vendor ID will go to:

https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?StrKornCob=HomePagePublic Click register Fill out appropriate information (will need vendor ID which is obtainable from the ProjNet POC for that Contractor) Sign in Search for project: (name, P2 number, title) for this project it is Moose Creek Dam Modification (may have to click unpinned if nothing is showing up) Add project Click on project Click key access and enter: SSX5V3-3JIR8C From there a new menu will pop up and allow them to enter comments

If they do not have an office on ProjNet. Email Deandra.L.Wood@usace.army.mil with a good POC to get in touch with so USACE-POA can create a new office in ProjNet, which the users will then be able to register under and follow steps above.

PROJNET INSTRUCTIONS

Contracting All information regarding this acquisition will be posted to https://beta.sam.gov (formally known as www.fbo.gov) once it is available for release.

Solicitation Number is W911KB21R0001 – FAR Part 15 Contracting by Negotiation

- Anticipating Best Value Tradeoff Source Selection

NAICS is 237990 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

- Small Business Size Standard $39.5 Million

Anticipated contract is FFP

Project Magnitude is between $100,000,000 and $250,000,000

Approved by SBA as Unrestricted Acquisition

- Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be required
- Factor Related to Extent of Small Business Participation Commitment is anticipated

Schedule Physical site visit is schedule for 20 August 2020 as stated in beta.sam.gov posting.

One-on-One briefing schedule is in works, once finished, WebEx notices will be sent out.

Tentative Schedule (Calendar Year)

Second Industry Day-3rd Quarter 2020
Solicitation-1st Quarter 2021
Award-3rd Quarter 2021
Construction Complete-3rd Quarter 2024
Contract Closeout-3rd Quarter 2025

No further industry day’s are scheduled. If a site visit is held as part of the solicitation, the details for that site visit will be published in the solicitation.

Solicitation and all amendments must be signed/acknowledged Contractors must have an active registration in https://beta.sam.gov and must not be debarred and/or suspended to be considered for award.

Site Visit 20 August 2020 Meeting Point has moved from Project Office parking lot to location identified below.

Hard Hat, Steel Toe Boots/Shoes, Reflective Vest, Hearing Protection, Safety Glasses are required. Active construction is going on near dam control works.

USACE-CEPOA Small Business Professional

Kathy Kinnett
(907) 753-5557
Kathy.J.Kinnett@usace.army.mil

Alaska Procurement Technical Assistance Center https://ptacalaska.org/

Anchorage: Jody King
(907) 786-7270jlking8@alaska.edu
Fairbanks: Pierre Thompson
(907) 456-7822pierre.thompson@aksbdc.org

Small Business Contacts/Helpful links Procurement Center Representative (Alaska)

Randy Miller
(907)229-6939
Randall.Miller@sba.gov

System for Award Management https://beta.sam.gov/

Small Business Administration www.sba.gov

Moose Creek Dam Safety Modification Chena river Lakes Flood Control project Steve Howard Project Manager

Coleman Chalup P.E.

Lead Engineer Dam Safety Program Manager

Robert Tedrick P.E.

Design Manager

Alaska District 17 August 2020

“The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.”

All information is subject to change once the project is out for bid.

This information represents a 65% design

Project Location

OPERATIONAL SCHEMATIC

Population at risk Operational schematic

Reaches

Project Office Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 4 Reach 5 Reach 6 Reach 7 Reach 8 Reach 9 Control Works/Chena River

FLOODWAY AND DAM

Control Works (1992 Pool of Record)

NEED TO UPDATE

Geology

Foundation is gravelly sand/sandy gravel that likely exceeds 1000 ft in thickness with a surficial blanket of silt.

The transition from sand and gravel to silt includes layers of sand and silty sand, including fine sand with Cu<3.

The sand and gravel includes gap graded and open work gravel lenses.

Sloughs from meanders and braids, as well as permafrost, complicate the near surface geology.

Chena River Tanana River

600 ft

MCD

SLOUGHS AND PERMAFROST LOCATIONS

Mapped Sloughs Mapped Permafrost

Capacitive-Coupled Resistivity (CCR) - 50 foot depth

Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) - 300 foot depth

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) - 50 foot depth

Embankment Design

Rock Fill

Geotechnical Investigation – USACE-CEPOA Centerline Boreholes

R3 R4 R5 R7 R6 R8 R9

89 borings for embankment and potential borrow sources 6,140 feet drilled Borings ranging from 15 to 130 feet deep Results Encountered permafrost Mix Design samples Better understanding of foundation conditions Encountered zones with cobbles Identified soil in potential borrow sources

Potential Failure modes

24 ft 40 to 80 ft

Silt Layer Coarse Sand and Gravel Layer

Pooling and Floodway from Chena River Stability Berm Upstream Water Stage <= 525 feet NAVD 88 Continuous Silty sand/fine sand Layer

Boils Boils Downstream – City of North Pole

Impervious silt blanket Moose Creek Dam During periods of high water stages in the Chena River, due to the silty sand and fine sand layer under the silt layer, three modes of failure can occur under the Moose Creek Dam: 1. backwards erosion and piping (horizontal exits), 2. backwards erosion and piping (vertical exits) and 3. contact erosion. These three modes of failure could act independently or together, eventually causing a failure in the dam, leading to flooding and potential risk of loss of life and damage to the cities of North Pole and Fairbanks, and other adjacent communities.

Horizontal Exit Vertical Exit Allowable Seepage Backwards erosion Potential Failure point Contact Erosion Piping

LEGEND

Potential Failure in Dam Fairbanks City of North Pole Backward Erosion and Piping with Vertical Exit Backward Erosion and Piping with Horizontal Exit Contract Erosion

PLAN (BARRIER WALL)

StationWall Depth (feet)Wall Elevation (NAVD88)
240+0061470
284+00285+006163470468
285+00335+0063468
335+00336+006367468464
336+00406+0067464
407+00484+0061470
484+00493+00Transition to top of bedrock at north abutment

Geotechnical Investigation – USACE-CEPOA Centerline Boreholes with Barrier Wall Extents

R3 R4 R5 R7 R6 R8 R9

Existing Crest

ALLOWABLE CREST HEIGHT REDUCTION

Existing Crest (ft)Allowable Crest Height Reduction (ft)
Crest Reduction05
Working Platform Width23.53451.561
Min Distance from Drain88

No side casting of material to the upstream or downstream

North Abutment

Station 457+00 to 479+70

Looking South Looking North

Station 434+29 to 457+00

Station 411+59 to 434+29 control works tie-in

Barrier Wall (Control Works tie-in)

Barrier wall tied into sloped concrete wall Sheet pile Jet Grouting Mix-in-Place

Station 388+90 to 411+59

Station 366+19 to 388+90

Station 343+49 to 366+19

Low Point Drain

Station 320+79 to 343+49

Station 298+09 to 320+79

Station 252+70 to 275+39

Station 230+00 to 252+70

Powerline decommission

Looking West Looking East

Mix-in-place waste material placement

Improve East Cutoff Dike Access Road Improve Tree Laydown Area Surface

Proposed North Borrow Source

Proposed Peninsula Borrow Source & staging/laydown area

Proposed South Borrow Source

Haul Roads

Mix Design Findings To Date Bureau of Reclamation Design Standards No. 13: Embankment Design (Table 16.7.11-1)

Dam NameCement Factor
(lb/yd3)Bentonite Content
(% of cement)W/C RatioCoarse/Fine Aggregate Ratio28-day UCS (lb/in2)
Island Copper Mine239222.781.0220
Wister Dam350101.01.39598
Meeks Cabin255151.851.04151
1Based on average for the mix shown.
Golder 2018 Mix Design (with Relief Well Water)

FHWA Design Manual: Deep Mixing For Embankment and Foundation Support (Bench Scale Testing)

Binder FactorCement Factor
(lb/yd3)Bentonite Content
(% of cement)W/C RatioCoarse/Fine Aggregate Ratio28-day UCS (lb/in2)
10 (lb/ft3) (8.16)18718.02.03258
20 (lb/ft3) (13.68)3399.01.38582
25 (lb/ft3) (16.08)4057.21.23934
30 (lb/ft3) (18.27)4666.01.131199
35 (lb/ft3) (20.29)5215.11.061334

Bureau of Reclamation Used for comparison of Mix Design

FHWA

Used Bench Scale Testing to conduct Mix Design

Contractor will be required to perform their own Mix Designs after award of the contract.

Allowable Technology for Barrier Wall construction at moose creek dam Mix in place methods shall be utilized to mix the embankment and foundation materials with Bentonite and Portland Cement in order to construct a Barrier Wall through Moose Creek Dam.

Any methods that utilize a bentonite slurry trench to support the embankment while excavation of the barrier wall takes place will NOT be utilized at Moose Creek Dam. The potential loss of slurry could result in failure of the embankment into the excavation during construction due to highly pervious foundation materials.

8/14/2020

Proposed Construction Criteria/Constraints

Specification
Max Depth67 feet
Min Width24 inches
Length25,300 feet (4.5 Miles)
Max Permeability1E-06 cm/sec
Unconfined Compressive Strength10 day rolling average at 200 psi @ 28 days, nothing below 150 psi
Measure of Acceptance
Verification CoringYes
Insitu Permeability TestingYes
Unconfined Compressive StrengthYes
Permeability on SamplesYes
Homogeneous and ContinuityYes
Connections to Existing Structures
Low Point DrainTie into Sheet Pile
Control WorksTie into Control Works with Jet Grouting. No embedment into existing concrete.

Closing Comments Questions should be submitted via ProjNet

These slides are posted to the industry day notification.

Questions/answers will be posted once all answers are consolidated.

Reminder: The Government reserves the right to not answer questions should they chose to do so.

image4.png image5.png image6.png image10.jpeg image11.jpeg image12.png image13.png image14.jpeg image15.jpeg image16.jpeg image17.jpeg image18.png image19.png image20.jpeg image21.png image22.png image23.png image24.png image25.png image26.jpeg image27.png image28.png image29.png image30.png image31.png image32.png image33.png image34.png image35.png image36.png image37.jpeg image38.jpeg image39.jpeg image40.jpeg image41.png image42.jpeg image43.jpeg image44.jpeg image45.jpeg image46.png image47.jpeg image48.jpeg image49.jpeg image50.png image51.jpeg image52.jpeg image53.jpeg image54.jpeg image55.jpeg image56.png image57.jpeg image58.jpeg image59.png image60.png image61.png image62.png image63.png image64.jpeg image65.jpeg image66.jpeg image67.jpeg image68.png image69.jpeg image70.jpeg image71.jpeg image72.png image73.jpeg image74.jpeg image75.jpeg image76.png image77.png image78.png image79.jpeg image80.jpeg image81.jpeg image82.jpeg image83.png image84.jpeg image85.jpeg image86.jpeg image87.jpeg image88.png image89.jpeg image90.jpeg image91.jpeg image92.png image93.jpeg image94.jpeg image95.jpeg image96.png image97.jpeg image98.jpeg image99.jpeg image100.jpeg image101.png image102.jpeg image103.jpeg image104.jpeg image105.jpeg image106.jpeg image107.jpeg image108.png image109.png image110.jpeg image111.jpeg image112.jpeg image113.jpeg image114.jpeg image115.png image116.jpeg image117.jpeg image118.jpeg image119.jpeg image120.png image121.jpeg image122.jpeg image123.jpeg image124.jpeg image125.jpeg image126.png image127.jpeg image128.jpeg image129.jpeg image130.jpeg image131.jpeg image132.png image133.jpeg image134.jpeg image135.jpeg image136.jpeg image137.jpeg image138.png image139.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image7.png image8.png image9.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .