W9115119R0009_past_performance_Questionaire.docx

DOCX document 287 KB Posted

Attached to
Analytic Engineering Mission Support Services
Solicitation number
W9115119R0009
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Responses_to_questions_from_Industry_W91151-19R-0009_15_July.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W91151-19-R-0009_amendmnent_0003.pdf PDF
W91151-19-R-0009-0002_amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Responses_to_questions_from_Industry_W91151-19R-0009_1_July.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0001-A021_(OneSAF)_24_June_.pdf PDF
Security_CRDLs_A0001-A032_Updated_24_June_.pdf PDF
COMBATXXI_CDRLs_A0001-A010_updated_24_June.pdf PDF
TRADOC_A001-A005_24_June.pdf PDF
TRO_CDRLs_A001-A003_24_June.pdf PDF
A002_Knowledge_Management.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_PRS.docx DOCX document
pricing_proposal_sheet__25_July_2018.xls XLS spreadsheet
Combined_DD254_docs_.pdf PDF
A001_Knowledge_Management.pdf PDF
Responses_to_questions_from_Industry_W91151-19R-0009_28_June.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE_1A_PERSONNEL_QUALIFICATIONS_REQUIREMENTS.docx DOCX document
W91151-19-R-0009_-0001_conformed_copy_.pdf PDF
TE_1_-_ESTIMATED_WORKLOAD_DATA.docx DOCX document
Technical_Exhibit_3_Incidental_property.pdf PDF
Technical_Exhibit_2_GFP.pdf PDF
TRADOC_CDRLs_A001-A005.pdf PDF
Security_CDRLs_A001-A031.pdf PDF
SCA_WD_01102018.pdf PDF
W91151-19-R-0009_30_May_19.pdf PDF
OneSAF_CDRLs_A001-A021.pdf PDF
TE_1_-_ESTIMATED_WORKLOAD_DATA.pdf PDF
DD0254_AnalyticEngineeringMissionSupportServices_082817.pdf PDF
TRO_A0001-A003.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_PRS.pdf PDF
COMBATXXI_CDRLs_A001-_A010.pdf PDF
Technical_Exhibit_1A_PERSONNEL_QUALIFICATION_REQUIREMENTS.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Department of the Army U.S. Army mission and installation contracting command MICC – Fort Hood 36000, DaRNALL LOOP, ROOM 1300B Fort Hood, TX 76544-5095

APPENDIX D

3 June 2019 ATEC Support Division

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W91151-19-R-0009

Dear Sir/Ma’am;

The US Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) – Fort Hood is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate Offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the Offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state or local government or commercial contracts as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 54151. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and submit electronically to Ms. Junee’ Johnson junee.c.johnson.civ@mail.mil, Ms. Ebonie McClintock-Bennett ebonie.f.mcclintock-bennett.civ@mail.mil and please copy usarmy.hood.acc-micc.mbx.micc-hood-asd@mail.mil, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 8 July 2019, whichever occurs first.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to Junee Johnson POC or the undersigned at 254-287-3243.

Sincerely,

Ebonie McClintock-Bennett
Contracting Officer

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________

Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________

POC:________________________Title:________________________
(Name)(E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

Please return the completed PPQ to the following people

Ms. Ebonie F. McClintock-Bennett ebonie.f.mcclintock-bennett.civ@mail.mil Ms. Junee C. Johnson junee.c.johnson.civ@mail.mil

And Please copy:

usarmy.hood.acc-micc.mbx.micc-hood-asd@mail.mil

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:____________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:____________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:____________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

_____________________________________________________
SignatureDate

Typed or Printed Name

TELEPHONE INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________

POC:________________________Title:________________________
(Name)(E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail & Facsimile No.)

If conducting a telephone interview:

“Hello, I am ______________________. I am calling in reference to Contract ____________________ with a company called ________________________. My questions will pertain to the contractor’s record of past, which is defined as within the past three years, and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. A summary of this discussion may be sent to you for your records. The following ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary).

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

Record of Interview: (to be filled out by PPT member)

( ) Discussed recentness and relevance of information

( ) Read summary to person contactedDate:____________________
( ) Sent copy to person contactedDate:____________________
______________________________________________________________
PPT Member SignatureTyped or Printed Name
______________________________________________________________
TelephoneFax

image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it.