Attachment_02_-_RETS_PRS.pdf

W9113M-15-R-0007 05 July 2017 Attachment 02

Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) Reagan Test Site (RTS) Engineering and Technical Services (RETS)

Performance Objective

Performance Standard Acceptable Quality Level

Method of Surveillance

Performance Evaluation Ratings

1. Technical/Quality

a. RTS Test Mission Services (TMS) and Instrumentation Modifications

b. RTS Standard Technical Services

(STS)

c. Transition

Contract requirements met for RTS TMS services and instrumentation modifications (PWS paragraph 3.1 and all sub-paragraphs excluding subparagraphs 3.1.1.1.7 (Range Safety Planning), 3.1.1.5.5 (Range Safety System Operations).

Contract requirements met for RTS STS services (PWS paragraph 3.2 and all sub-paragraphs excluding RTS range safety (subparagraph 3.2.4.5), security management (subparagraph 3.2.4.8), and government property management (subparagraph 3.2.4.11)

Transition Phase-in and Phase- Out conducted IAW Government approved Transition Phase-In and Phase Out plans.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor are satisfactory.

Maintain satisfactory quality performance with effective and efficient cost controls.

100% inspection of deliverable data and reports.

Combination of Periodic and Random inspection of rendered services.

Review of feedback surveys from test mission customers.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions are only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

2. Cost Control

a. Test Mission Services - Customer Mission Estimating and Billing Accuracy

b. Standard Technical Services Cost Control

Overall contract

Actual mission support costs for all activities for each RTS test mission program are billed IAW FAR Part 31 and cost reporting is delivered to the government for the actual mission support costs IAW CDRL requirements.

STS Contract labor mix is controlled in efficient and effective manner; travel, material, and ODCs effectively controlled. Effective and efficient cost controls with high quality performance maintained.

Maintain effective and efficient cost controls with quality performance.

Actual costs are within 10% of final estimated costs

Actual labor resource mix is maintained within 10% of awarded contract resource mix.

Travel, material, and ODCs effectively monitored and controlled.

reports.

Combination of Periodic and Random inspection of rendered services.

Review of feedback surveys from test mission customers.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions are only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which

3. Schedule/ Timeliness

Overall Contact: Contract deliverables are delivered on time. Contractor adapts to schedule changes during execution of TMS and STS requirements.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor are satisfactory.

reports.

Combination of Periodic and Random inspection of rendered services.

Review of feedback surveys from test mission customers.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element

4. Management or Business Relations

a. Contract Execution

b. Coordination and Flexibility

c. Management of Key Personnel

Contractor meets all contract requirements under the PWS

4.6. Contractor integrates and

coordinates all activity needed to execute the contract; identifies and applies resources required to meet schedule requirements;

assigns responsibility for missions/actions required by contract; communicates appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner.

Contractor is timely, accurate, and complete in identification of problems, required corrective actions, and proposal submittals resulting in effective business relations and customer satisfaction.

Qualified key personnel are maintained and/or hired in a timely manner and IAW key personnel requirements identified in the PWS (paragraph 4.3).

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions reports.

Combination of periodic and random inspection of rendered services.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element

5. Management or Business Relations - Training

a. AT Level I awareness training,

b. AT Awareness Training for Contractor Personnel Traveling Overseas.

c. iWATCH training, All contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access Army installations, facilities and controlled access areas shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 30 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable and annually thereafter. AT Level I awareness training is available at the following website: http://jko.jten.mil

AT Awareness Training for Contractor Personnel Traveling Overseas. US based contractor employees and associated subcontractor employees to make available and to receive government provided area of responsibility (AOR) specific AT awareness training as directed by AR 525-13. Specific AOR training content is directed by the combatant commander with the unit ATO being the local point of contact.

The contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall brief all employees on the local iWATCH program (training standards provided by RTS).

This locally developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to

This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 05 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 30 calendar days after contract award.

Annual certification provided to COR listing individuals Contractors that have completed required training.

completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 05 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 30 calendar

Contractor meets certification requirements 100% of the time.

Assignment of performance rating for training.

SATISFACTORY: Training is completed as required.

UNSATISFACTORY: Training is not completed as required.

d. OPSEC training.

e. DoD Cyber Awareness training

f. Threat Awareness and Reporting Program (TARP) report suspicious activity to the

COR.

Per AR 530-1 Operations Security, the contractor employees must complete Level I OPSEC Awareness training.

OPSEC Awareness for Military Members, DoD Employees and Contractors is available at the following website:

http://cdsetrain.dtic.mil/opsec/ind ex.htm

All contractor employees and associated sub-contractor employees must complete the DoD Cyber awareness training before issuance of network access and annually thereafter.

All contractor employees working IA/IT functions must comply with DoD and Army training requirements in DoDD 8570.01, DoD 8570.01-M and AR 25-2 within six months of appointment to IA/IT functions.

DoD Cyber Awareness Challenge Training is available at the following website:

https://ia.signal.army.mil/DoDIA A/

Comply with AR 381-12. All contractors with security clearances must receive annual TARP training by a Counter Intelligence agent or other trainer as specific in 2-4b of

AR 38-12.

This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 30 calendar completed before issuance of network access and annually thereafter with the results reported to the COR NLT 30 calendar days after training is complete.

This face-to-face training shall be completed annually with the results reported to the COR NLT 30 calendar days after completion.

g. Combating Trafficking in Persons

Comply with FAR Part 52.222- 50, Combating Trafficking in Persons

Contractor compliance plan posted at the work place and on the Contractor’s website.

Annual certification that the Contractor has implemented a compliance plan.

Assignment of performance rating for COMBATING IN TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS criteria:

SATISFACTORY: Compliance plan is posted no later than the initiation of contract performance at the workplace in an easily accessible area. If posting at the workplace or on the web site Is impracticable, the Contractor shall provide the relevant contents of the compliance plan to each worker in writing. Annual certification provided to the Contracting Officer that the Contractor has implemented a compliance plan.

UNSATISFACTORY: Compliance plan is not made available to employees in the workplace, on the web site, or to each Contractor employee in writing. Annual certification not provided to Contracting Officer.

6. Subcontracting/ Small Business

Overall Contract: Contractor’s award and management of subcontracts is timely, and contractor meets small/small disadvantage and women-owned business participation goals.

Performance demonstrates a good faith effort to meet all of the negotiated subcontracting goals in the various socio-economic categories for the current period.

Contractor complies with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns.

Contractor meets any other small business participation requirements included in the contract/order.

Contractor fulfills the requirements of the subcontracting plan included in the contract/order.

Contactor completes and submits Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in

100% inspection of contractor subcontracting / small business plan and execution reports

Performance exceeded all statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had exceptional success with initiatives to assist, promote, and utilize small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), HUBZone small business, veteran-owned small business (VOSB) and service disabled veteran owned small business (SDVOSB). Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Went above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan and other small business requirements of the contract/order. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.

VERY GOOD

Performance met all of the statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had significant success with initiatives to assist, promote and utilize SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, and SDVOSB. Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met or exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, an accurate and timely manner.

including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Endeavored to go above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.

SATISFACTORY

Performance demonstrated a good faith effort to meet all of the negotiated subcontracting goals in the various socio-economic categories for the current period.

Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met any other small business participation requirements included in the contract/order. Fulfilled the requirements of the subcontracting plan included in the contract/order.

Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.

MARGINAL

Performance is deficient in meeting key subcontracting plan elements. Deficient in complying with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract/order. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner. Failed to satisfy one or more requirements of a corrective action plan currently in place; however, does show an interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level and has demonstrated a commitment to apply the necessary resources to do so. Required a corrective action plan.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance is noncompliant with FAR 52.219-8 and 52.219-9, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract/order. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner.

Showed little interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level or is generally uncooperative.

Required a corrective action plan.

7. Regulatory Compliance

a. Security Management

b. Industrial Safety

c. Information Assurance

Security Management is provided for RTS operations IAW PWS sections 3.2.4.8, and 5.1.

Industrial Safety for RTS Operations is provided IAW PWS section 5.2.

Information Assurance is provided for RTS operations IAW PWS section 3.2.3

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions reports.

Combination of periodic and random inspection of rendered services.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element

8. Other

a. Property and Data Accountability

b. RTS Mission and RF Safety

Maintain Government furnished property (GFP, GFE, GFI, etc.), contractor acquired property (CAP) and data accountability IAW PWS sections 3.2.4.11

RTS Mission Safety, RF safety is provided IAW PWS sections

3.1.1.1.7 (Range Safety Planning), 3.1.1.5.5 (Range Safety System Operations), and

3.2.4.5 (RTS Range RF safety).

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions reports.

Combination of periodic and random inspection of rendered services.

Property Inventories and Data Files

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element