W900KK-20-R-0001 Amendment 0001 Jul 13 2020.pdf

PDF 561 KB Posted

Attached to
Cyber TRIDENT
Solicitation number
W900KK-20-R-0001
Issued by

About this file

This is a solicitation for the Cyber Training, Readiness, Integration, Delivery and Enterprise Technology (TRIDENT) contract. Key details include:

  • The contract will provide acquisition lifecycle support for the Persistent Cyber Training Environment program of record and continue evolving the platform, architectures, and development operations environment.

  • Services required are insertion and integration of third-party technologies into the platform baseline, platform maintenance and evolution, acquisition lifecycle system management for capabilities within the environment, identifying acquisition optimization opportunities, and supporting interoperability initiatives.

  • Proposals are due no later than August 13, 2020. Award is anticipated in the third quarter of fiscal year 2021.

  • The contract has a ceiling value of $957.7 million over a potential eight-year ordering period. Firm fixed-price, cost-plus-fixed-fee, and cost-reimbursement orders are contemplated.

  • The soliciting agency is the Department of the Army Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center. The program office is Program Executive Office Simulation, Training and Instrumentation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W900KK-20-R-0001 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Q-As with Final RFP - Cyber TRIDENT 7-27-20.pdf PDF
W900KK-20-R-0001 Conformed thru Amend 0003.pdf PDF
DO 0003-SOW-CDRLs 7-20-20.pdf PDF
W900KK-20-R-0001 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Q-As with Final RFP - Cyber TRIDENT 7-23-20.pdf PDF
W900KK-20-R-0001 Conformed Amend 0002.pdf PDF
W900KK-20-R-0001 Conformed Thru Amend 0001.pdf PDF
Attach 1 - Base SOW - Cyber TRIDENT - 6 Jul 2020.pdf PDF
TO 0002-SOW-CDRLs 7-9-20.pdf PDF
Attach 4 - RCS Price List -6-29-2020 Updated.docx DOCX document
Attach 20 - Traceability Matrix - 6-24-20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Q-As with Final RFP - Cyber TRIDENT 7-13-20.pdf PDF
DO 0003-SOW-CDRLs 7-9-20.pdf PDF
TO 0001-SOW-CDRLs 7-9-20.pdf PDF
RFP - W900KK-20-R-0001 11 Jun 2020 - Released.pdf PDF
TO 0002-SOW-CDRLs 6-8-20.pdf PDF
Attach 20 - Traceability Matrix - 6-5-20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach 19 - Q-A Spreadsheet Form - 12 Mar 2020.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach 5 - Small Business Participation Proposal Form.DOCX DOCX document
Attach 4 - RCS Price List -6-10-2020 Updated.docx DOCX document
DO 0003-SOW-CDRLs 6-8-20.pdf PDF
Attach 16 - SF1408 - Pre-Award Suvey of Prospective Contractor Acctg System.pdf PDF
Exhibits - Cyber TRIDENT - CDRLs - 6-4-20.pdf PDF
TO 0001-SOW-CDRLs 6-8-20.pdf PDF
Attach 2 -Contract Labor Rates - Updated 6-8-2020.docx DOCX document
Attach 18 - Past Perf Questionnaire - Cyber TRIDENT - 6-8-20 Updated.docx DOCX document
Attach 15 - Pre-Award Survey of Prospective Contractor Acctg System Checklist.pdf PDF
Attach 1 - Base SOW 1 Jun 2020.pdf PDF
Instructions for Obtaining Distribution D Document - 10 Jun 2020.pdf PDF
Attach 14 - PCTE DD254 - 5 Jun 2020.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to make the follow ing changes:

1. The proposal due date has been extended from 6 Aug 2020 to 13 Aug 2020. Section A, Block 9 and Section L.A.3.0 is changed accordingly.

2. Section F ordering periods for the follow ing base contract CLINs are changed as indicated:

CLIN 0001 start date is changed to 01 Jun 2021; CLIN 0014 end date is changed to 30 Jun 2026; CLIN 1014 ordering period is changed to 01 Jul 2026 to 30 Jun 2028; CLIN 2003 start date is changed to 01 Jul 2028; CLIN 2004 start date is changed to 01 Jul 2028.

3. Section G3, SB Participation Plan attachment reference is removed.

4. Secton J, Attachment 4 name is corrected as follow s: Regional Compute and Storage Price List.

5. Section J, Attachments 1 (SOW, Sec 3.2.1), 4 (RCS Price List), 10 (Govt Prop Listing), 17 (Workbook), and 20 (Traceability Matrix) are modified as attached.

6. Attachment # 5 Small Business Participation Plan is removed and Section L.B.4 is adjusted accordingly.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 48

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 13-Jul-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W900KK20R0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11-Jun-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Jul-2020

CODE

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ORLANDO

ATTN: BRAVO DIVISION

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

W900KK 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W900KK20R0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

CONTINUATION OF BLOCK 14

7. Section L.A.2.0 Proposal Instructions - Sentence is modified as follows: With the exception of the Price/Cost volume and the Administrative Information volume, no cost or pricing information should appear in any volume.

8. Sections A block 9, L.A.2.2, L.A.2.3 and L.A.3.0 are modified to required all proposals be submitted via DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) located at https://safe.apps.mil/.

9. Section L.A.2.2.1 third bullet has been modified to add factor number and factor name.

10. Section L.A.2.2 numbering has been corrected to L.A.2.2.2.

11. Section L.A.2.3, Note 1 has been changed to add "List of Exhibits".

12. Section L.B.1.2 references are corrected as follows: Base SOW Section 3.2.5.8, 3.2.7, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, TO 0001 SOW-2020-011-01, Sec 3.2

13. Section L.B.1.6.A numbering is corrected.

14. Section L.B.2.b.iv Section name is changed to Attachment 4, Regional Compute and Storage Price List (IAW Base Contract CLINs 0005, 1005 and 2005).

15. Section L.B.2.c.i.B cost and substantiating information requested on subcontractors has been changed to only require cost and substantiating information from major subcontractors.

16. Section L.B.2.c.ii.B cost and substantiating information requested on subcontractors has been changed to only require cost and substantiating information from major subcontractors.

17. Section L.B.2.d.ii. labor rate cost breakdown for all proposed labor categories, both FFP and CPFF was incorporated for further clarification.

18. Section L.B.2.d.ii. the profit information is added as follows: In addition, the offeror shall include rates and amounts in the spreadsheet on each indirect cost element; such as labor overhead, fringe, general and administraive, FCCOM and profit (where applicable).

19. Section L.B.2.d.ii cost and substantiating information requested on subcontractors has been changed to only require cost and substantiating information from major subcontractors.

20. Section L.B.3.2(b), item 12 in table is changed to Technical Representative or Program Manager and Program Name.

21. Section L.B.4 change sentence in paragraph as follows: The document shall delineate each 12 months of performance of the five (5) year base ordering period, of the two (2) year option ordering period and of the 12 month option ordering period.

22. Section L.B.5.5 Corrected location for submission of information on status of offeror’s accounting system.

23. Section M.B.1.5.i is changed as follows: Description of transition plan, to include integration factory with related milestones/activities with a schedule for project and contract management among existing PCTE contractors and a checklist of required activities.

24. Section M.B.4.1 is changed as follows: The Government will verify total value presented in the Small Business Participation Commitment Document are consistent with the Total Contact Value of $957M, as stated in Section B, Contract Minimum/Maximum Quantity and Contract Value. Proposals that are not consistent between the Small Business Participation Commitment Document and Total Contract Value of $957M, may be considered “unacceptable”, and therefore rejected; the Contracting Officer will notify an Offeror if the proposal is rejected in accordance with FAR 15.503(a)(1).

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 06-Aug-2020 02:00 PM to 13-Aug-2020 02:00 PM.

The depository location has changed from 12211 Science Dr, Orlando, FL to (See Instructions in Sec

L.3.0).

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been modified:

IDC CONSTRAINTS

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum contract value stated in the following table. The maximum contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum contract value stated in the following table. The ceiling amount of the contract is $957,739,868.00. There is no specified percentage of the ceiling amount for firm fixed-price CLINs and delivery orders versus cost-plus-fixed fee CLINS or cost-reimburseable CLINs and delivery orders. The quantities and dollar amounts set forth in the individual CLINs are merely estimates. The entire $957,739,868.00 coud be CPFF delivery orders, Cost-Reimburseable delivery orders, FFP delivery or combination of FFP, CPFF and Cost-Reimburseable delivery orders.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

$25,000,000.00 $957,739,868.00

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule Item has been deleted from CLIN 0001:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

31-AUG-2021

N/A US ARMY PEO STRI

KOZLOWSKI, JAMES

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

407-208-5864 FOB: Destination

W906ZL

The following Delivery Schedule item has been added to CLIN 0001:

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2021 TO

31-AUG-2021

N/A US ARMY PEO STRI

KOZLOWSKI, JAMES

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

407-208-5864

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0014 has been added:

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2021 TO

30-JUN-2026

N/A US ARMY PEO STRI

KOZLOWSKI, JAMES

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

407-208-5864

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 1014 has been added:

CAGE

POP 01-JUL-2026 TO

30-JUN-2028

N/A US ARMY PEO STRI

KOZLOWSKI, JAMES

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

407-208-5864

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2003 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2028 TO

30-JUN-2029

N/A US ARMY PEO STRI

KOZLOWSKI, JAMES

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

407-208-5864

To:

CAGE

POP 01-JUL-2028 TO

30-JUN-2029

N/A US ARMY PEO STRI

KOZLOWSKI, JAMES

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

407-208-5864

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2004 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2028 TO

30-JUN-2029

N/A US ARMY PEO STRI

KOZLOWSKI, JAMES

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

407-208-5864

To:

CAGE

POP 01-JUL-2028 TO

30-JUN-2029

N/A US ARMY PEO STRI

KOZLOWSKI, JAMES

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

407-208-5864

SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

G3 SB PARTICIPATION PLAN

Small Business Participation Commitment Document A. Small Business Participation data shall be submitted on a semi-annual basis IAW the Small Business

Utilization Report , CDRL A002 and the Small Business Participation Commitment Document, listed in Section J. If, at any time during contract performance, the Contracting Officer determines that Small Business participation levels are not being maintained at or above the goal, the Contractor will be required to submit a plan for reallocating resources in a manner that will ensure the goal will be met. The reallocation plan should be submitted no later than 15 days after notice from the Contracting Officer and implementation should begin within 20 days thereafter.

B. Proposed Small Business Participation Percentage of __% (to be completed at contract award) is incorporated into the resulting contract. Small Business participation calculation will include contract amounts on all delivery/task orders placed against all CLINs. The small business participation amounts and percentages shall be measured by comparing the total obligated amount on delivery/task orders to the total actual amount performed by Small Business concerns on those delivery/task orders. Failure to meet the overall Small Business Participation of __% in each 12 months of performance beginning from contract award will affect the assessment provided in the Contractor Performance Assessment Report under Utilization of Small Business.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS

Attachments

Attachment 1 Basic Contract Statement of Work 6 Jul 2020 40 pages Attachment 2 Contract Labor Rates (FFP and CPFF Rates) 6 Mar 2020 1 page Attachment 3 REMOVED N/A N/A Attachment 4 Regional Compute and Storage Price List 29 Jun 2020 2 pages Attachment 5 REMOVED N/A N/A Attachment 6 Small Business Subcontracting Plan

(to be added at contract award)

TBD TBD

Attachment 7 Regional Compute and Storage (RCS) Installation Documentation

(a) RCS Installation Guide 20 Feb 2020 219 pages

(b) RCS 5 Rack Elevation 27 Feb 2020 7 pages

(c) RCS Specification Overview – Ft Meade 27 Oct 2017 8 pages

(d) RCS 5 Rack PDU Calculation (24A) 02 May 2019 6 pages

(e) RCS01HAVAC Calculation 23 Oct 2019

(f) RCS01 Weight Calculation 23 Oct 2019 Attachment 8 Platform Development Kit (PDK) 28 Apr 2020 112 pages Attachment 9 Government Furnished Property (GFP) Only Listing of Persistent Cyber Training Environment (PCTE) 10 Mar 2020 4 pages

Attachment 10 Government Equipment PCTE HW-SW Property Listing – To include GFP

13 Jul 2020 16 pages

Attachment 11 Property Management Plan (to be added at contract award)

TBD TBD

Attachment 12 Transition (Phase In) Checklist (to be added at contract award)

TBD TBD

Attachment 13 Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) Checklist (to be added at contract award)

TBD TBD

Attachment 14 Contract Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254

25 May 2020 3 pages

Attachment 15 SF 1408 Pre-Award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Checklist

TBD 10 pages

Attachment 16 DCAA Pre-Award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System

TBD 2 pages

Attachment 17 Cost Proposal Spreadsheet 6 Jul 2020 1 page Attachment 18 Past Performance Questionnaire 15 Apr 2020 5 pages Attachment 19 Question and Answer Form 6 Mar 2020 1 Page Attachment 20 Traceability Matrix Form 24 Jun 2020 1 Page

Exhibits – Contracts Data Requirements List (CDRLs)

A001 DI-MGMT-81808 Contractor's Risk Management Plan 3 June 2020 1 page

A002 DI-MGMT-

82041A

Small Business Utilization Report 3 June 2020 1 page

B001 DI-IPSC-81427B Software Development Plan (SDP) 3 June 2020 1 page

B002 DI-MGMT-

80934C

Operations Security (OPSEC) Plan 3 June 2020 1 page

B003 DI-MGMT-82247 System Security Plan & Associated Plans of Action to Implement NIST SP 800-171

3 June 2020 2 pages

B101 DI-MISC-80711A Maintenance Plan 3 June 2020 1 page

B102 DI-MISC-80711A Trouble Ticketing/Problem Reporting Plan 3 June 2020 1 page

C101 DI-MGMT-80269 PCTE Consolidated GFE Report 3 June 2020 2 pages

C102 DI-MISC-80711A Property Management System Plan 3 June 2020 1 page C103 DI-MGMT-81994 Priced Bill of Materials 3 June 2020 1 page

C104 DI-SESS-81758 Logistics Product Data 3 June 2020 1 page

C105 DI-TMSS-

80527C Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Manuals & Associated Supplemental Data

3 June 2020 2 pages

A101 DI-MGMT-81928 CONTRACTORS PROGRESS AND STATUS

REPORT

3 June 2020 1 page

A102 DI-ADMN-81505 Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes 3 June 2020 1 page

A201 DI-MGMT-81928 CONTRACTORS PROGRESS AND STATUS

REPORT

3 June 2020 1 page

A202 DI-ADMN-81505 Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes 3 June 2020 1 page B201 DI-MISC-80711A Platform Development Kit (PDK) 4 June 2020 2 pages B202 DI-MISC-80711A System Integration Plan 3 June 2020 1 page

B203 DI-IPSC-81442A Software Version Description (SVD) 3 June 2020 1 page

B204 DI-SESS-81875 Configuration Management Plan 3 June 2020 1 page

B205 DI-MISC-80711A Consolidated User Feedback Report 4 June 2020 1 page

B206 DI-MISC-80711A Training Materials/Courseware 3 June 2020 1 page

B207 DI-MGMT-82001 DOD Risk Management Framework (RMF) Package Deliverables

3 June 2020 2 pages

B208 DI-NDTI-80603A Test Procedure 3 June 2020 1 page

B209 DI-MISC-80711A Test Procedure Report 3 June 2020 1 page

B210 DI-NDTI-80809B Test/Inspection Report 3 June 2020 1 page B211 DI-NDTI-80566 Test Plan 3 June 2020 1 page

A301 DI-MGMT-81928 CONTRACTORS PROGRESS AND STATUS

REPORT

3 June 2020 1 page

A302 DI-ADMN-81505 Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes 3 June 2020 1 page

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

PART A GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

L.A.1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

This solicitation will result in a Single-Source (SS) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract with an ordering period up to 96 months (60-months base ordering period, one two year option and one, one-year option ordering period). This solicitation will become the basic contract for the Cyber TRIDENT effort.

Requirements will be proposed on the immediate needs of the Government and executed as delivery/task orders during the ordering period. Task Orders (TO) 0001 and 0002 and Delivery Order (DO) 0003 will be awarded under this solicitation along with the basic Cyber TRIDENT ID/IQ contract.

The primary North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this solicitation is 541512, (size standard $30M) Computer System Design Services (planning and designing computer systems that integrate computer hardware, software and communication technologies).

The source selection process will be conducted IAW FAR 15.101-1 Best Value, Tradeoff approach, where it is in the best interest of the Government to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

L.A.2.0 PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

The Offeror is required to submit sufficient information concerning the areas identified in Part B, to include the terms and conditions of the entire solicitation, to enable Government personnel to fully ascertain capabilities of the Offeror to perform the requirements. The proposal must be sufficient in detail and scope to permit evaluation and provide the evaluators a clear understanding of the Offeror’s capability to meet or exceed the defined elements as required by the solicitation. All proposals must clearly and convincingly demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements, associated risks and is able, willing and competent to devote the resources necessary to meet the requirements, and that the Offeror has valid and practical solutions for all requirements considering potential risk areas. Offeror must respond to all Section L requirements of the solicitation and not alter or rearrange the solicitation. The Offeror has the burden of proof to demonstrate compliance with all the evaluation factors identified in this solicitation. The Offeror is advised that the Government may incorporate into the final contract enhancing features included in the Offeror’s proposal deemed beneficial to the Government.

With the exception of the Price/Cost volume and the Administrative Information volume, no cost or pricing information should appear in any volume. Alternate proposals are not acceptable.

In presenting material in the proposal, the Offeror is advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Clarity, brevity, and logical organization should be emphasized during proposal preparation. The Offeror is responsible to present enough information to allow the Government to evaluate the proposed work effort, support, and approach, as well as the cost/price proposal without opening discussions. Though the Government reserves the right to hold discussions, award may be based upon initial offers. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands, or can and/or will comply with, the specifications, and paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof without supporting information are considered inadequate by the Government, and may render a rating of unacceptable.

The Offeror must include any data that illustrates the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. Failure to address a specific factor or element clearly may be considered a deficiency.

Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentation materials beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal is neither necessary nor desired.

The Offeror is expected to comply with all requirements of the RFP. The Government advises the Offeror that taking exception or deviating from any term or condition of the RFP may make an offer unacceptable, and the proposal un-awardable, unless the RFP expressly authorizes such an exception or deviation with regard to that specific term or condition.

In accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(A)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. Should discussions take place, all offerors in the competitive range will be allowed the number of dates stated during in discussion correspondence with the offerors in the competitive range to submit Final Proposal Revisions. The Contracting Officer will schedule the discussions sessions, and each offeror within the competitive range will be notified of the time and place to their discussion session. Appropriate security clearances should be provided by the offerors in sufficient time to process the requests. The Contracting Officer will provide additional instructions with the notifications. The discussions sessions will take place at a facility of the Government’s choosing in the Orlando, FL area.

Throughout these instructions, a “major subcontractor” is defined as a subcontractor who provides at least 20% of the proposed total price/cost (excluding the Offeror’s profit/fee), for the contract. “Team member” is defined as those entities that make up a joint venture or any other legal partnership or teaming arrangement formed for the purpose of responding to this solicitation. A team member also could be a corporate parent, division, subsidiary, or affiliate.

The Government is not responsible for nor will the Government pay any portion of the costs associated with the development of the offeror’s written proposal.

The Government anticipates an award 3rd Quarter, Fiscal Year 2021. This information is provided for use as a basis for schedules and burden (labor, overheads, G&A, etc.) mid-point calculations. The Government requests proposals be valid for at least two hundred seventy (270) calendar days from the proposal due date.

Offerors are cautioned that in order for their proposal to be eligible for award, the proposal shall be in compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in the solicitation.

L.A.2.1 SOLICITATION QUESTIONS

All questions regarding the RFP shall be submitted via email to the Contract Specialist and the Contracting Officer within 15 calendar days after the release date (annotated at Block 5 of SF33) of the final RFP. Offerors shall submit questions using the Solicitation Question/Comment Form, Attachment 19, located in Section J. No phone inquiries regarding the RFP will be received or acknowledged. Offerors will received an acknowledgement of their questions via response to the email submission. All inquiry items will be answered via an Amendment to the RFP/Solicitation and posted to www.beta.sam.gov website under the solicitation number.

All questions and answers will be posted without the offeror’s identification. All questions and answers will be posted except for questions that would reveal a potential Offeror’s confidential business strategy, technical solution, or any information that is considered unique to a particular Offeror. All questions and answers that DO NOT reveal a potential offeror’s confidential business strategy, technical solution, or any information that is considered unique to a particular offer will be posted. The Government reserves the right to decline addressing questions received after 15 calendar days after the RFP release date.

L.A.2.2 PROPOSAL FORMAT

The required method of the Cyber TRIDENT proposal delivery is via the DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) located at https://safe.apps.mil/. Offerors shall ensure the recipients receiving the proposal submitted via DoD SAFE are as identified in Section L.A.3.0

Offerors are encouraged to test the DoD SAFE proposal exchange methodology by sending a copy of the Cyber

TRIDENT Base SOW to the aforementioned recipients at least 72 hours prior to the proposal due date/time. The Government will confirm receipt, via email, within one business day. If confirmation email is not received, please coordinate directly with the PCO to resolve issue.

If there are any technical difficulties with DoD SAFE, the Offeror shall coordinate an alternate method of Cyber TRIDENT proposal submittal with the recipients, no less than 24 hours prior to the due date and time. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the entire proposal is received by the Government prior to the proposal due date and time. All proposals submitted must be in compliance with the full solicitation.

LA.2.2.1 Proposal Document Format

Proposals must be formatted as follows:

Using a Times New Roman 12 pt normal font except for font on graphs and tables;

Single-spaced with 1-inch margins all around, and formatted for standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper;

All proposal pages shall be numbered with factor number, factor name, section number and page numbers

(except for supporting/back-up data provided with the Cost/Price proposal) and any applicable data use restrictions as specified in FAR Subpart 52.215-1(e);

When foldout pages are used they must not exceed 11 x 17 inches and will be counted as 1 page. Drawings may be provided separately and may be any size, but should be folded to approximately 8.5 x 11 inch standard size and will count as 1 page;

Graphs and tables shall be presented in no smaller than an 8 pt font and can be a font other than Times New Roman. Graphs and table resolution should be consistent with the purpose of the data presented.

All proposal submissions shall not contain classified data nor shall include hyperlinks in the proposal.

All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, proposal volume number, date, Request for Proposal (RFP) number and “SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION -- SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104” in the header and/or footer.

The Offeror will provide a complete proposal to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) as electronic files fully compatible with Microsoft Office 2013 and for information not supported by MS Office products, with the latest Adobe Acrobat reader on a CD-ROM. The Offeror will ensure that the Price/Cost Volume is provided on a separate file. Each file is to be labeled for content and the Offeror’s name and shall be free of any virus or malware.

Data submitted in spreadsheet/workbook format shall be readable by MS Excel 2013. All files shall be clearly identified with a filename appropriate to the content (e.g., Volume I Technical/Management Appendix-A). Please note, self-extracting ".exe" files are not acceptable. Note: Offerors shall submit back-up documentation (e.g. DCAA and/or DCMA rate agreements and vendor quotes), not available in a compatible MS Office 2013 format, in Adobe Acrobat (pdf.) file format.

The Offeror must present proposal information in a manner that facilitates a one-to-one comparison between the information presented and this Proposal Instruction. Proposal information must be structured such that its paragraph number/letter is identical to the Proposal Instructions paragraph number to which it is responding, although the Offeror may add lower tier subparagraphs. The Offeror must provide reasons it will not provide information for a particular paragraph. The proposal information instructions are structured by paragraph numbers where first, second, third, and fourth parts correspond to the volume, book, section, and element, etc., in Offeror’s proposal. If the data is not contained in the appropriate volume of the proposal, it will not be evaluated. For example, if past performance narratives are submitted under the Cost/Price Volume rather than the volume specified, the proposal will be evaluated as if no Past Performance narratives were submitted at all.

L.A.2.2.2 Voice-Over Slide Brief Presentation

A pre-recorded Audio File (.mp3 format) voice-over slide brief with a PowerPoint presentation (.pptx) electronic file shall be submitted by each offeror to augment any or all Factor 1 Technical/Management

Approach section elements (at the lowest element level) included in its proposals and will be evaluated in conjunction with the proposal and in accordance with its corresponding Section M criteria. Each offeror shall submit an audio file containing a narrated briefing accompanying the 75 slides, and presenting for no longer than a total of two and one-half hours (2.5 hours). The voice-over presenter(s) should use slides during their presentations (see below for slide count restrictions), and announce in the voice over the slide number and element they are augmenting to when transitioning between slides. Audio file, along with the electronic slide presentation is to be submitted with proposal submission. Slide presentations shall have page numbers and Section L element number and include a presentation cover sheet, proprietary data sheet, and presentation agenda with a time index of the slides. The presentation cover sheet, proprietary data sheet, and presentation agenda are excluded from the slide count. The slides submitted for the voice-over brief presentation must be no smaller than an 8 pt font with no margin restrictions, include no notes and shall be submitted in Microsoft (MS) PowerPoint format (MS Office 2013 compatible).

The voice-over audio file and slide presentation are to be arranged in the order of the elements it is augmenting. The offeror shall have each presenter identify which factor element is being discussed during the voice-over audio file and slide presentation.

The offeror shall identify any and all proprietary items utilized during the voice-over presentation.

Cost/Price data should be provided only in the Cost/Price volume of the written proposal and NOT as part of this brief presentation.

The voice-over brief presentation shall include team members (e.g. program management, technical personnel) who will work or perform a key role on the Cyber TRIDENT effort. Identification of all speaker(s), along with their company name and position, shall be made at the start of the voice-over presentation.

Offerors are advised that there shall be NO embedding of documents, hyperlinks, videos, or tool demonstrations incorporated in the briefing slides or during the voice-over presentations. Slides which are not addressed during the voice-over brief presentation will be removed from the offeror’s proposal and not be considered as part of the proposal submission. Offerors shall not submit backup slides.

If the information presented by the offeror during their voice-over presentation differs from the offeror’s submitted technical/management proposal, a weakness or deficiency may be generated by the Government which may result in an unfavorable adjectival rating. Additionally, in the event of a discrepancy between the voice-over presentation and the technical/management.

The voice-over presentation shall be submitted in mp3 file format. The voice- over brief presentation does not constitute an oral presentation as that term is defined in FAR 15.102.

L.A.2.3 PROPOSAL CONTENT AND VOLUMES

Each volume of the proposal shall be submitted electronically and in the format as specified in the table below. All volumes of the proposal shall be submitted electronically via SAFE to the email address provided in Section L.3.0 prior to the closing date/time stated in this solicitation. Page limitations for each volume if any, are also specified in the table below and notes 1 and 2. Proposal pages beyond the specified maximum limit will not be reviewed as part of the evaluation.

Volume Volume Title Maximum Page Limit

(See notes 1 and 2)

Factor 1:

Technical/Management

Transition Plan

75 pages for proposal

15 pages for plan (to include checklists)

Voice-Over Brief

75 Slides and 2 ½ hours for voice-over brief

2 Factor 2: Cost/Price

Spreadsheet

Unlimited

3 Factor 3: Past Performance Unlimited

4 Factor 4: Small Business Participation

Unlimited

5 Administrative Information Unlimited

Table 1

Note 1: The proposal’s cover and/or title sheet, table of contents, list of exhibits, labor category (tables) and slides are excluded from the page limitation.

Note 2: Those pages submitted with the proposal that exceed the page count in Table 1 above for the Technical/Management Volume will not be evaluated. The voice-over brief file submitted with the proposal that exceed 2 ½ hours will not be evaluated, along with the slides associated with the voice-over file exceeding 2 ½ hours.

Each volume shall contain the following information:

Cover and/or title page Title of proposal and proposal number as applicable Offeror’s name, address and POC RFP number Proposal volume Copy number Page number Table of Contents (The table of contents must provide sufficient detail to enable easy location of important elements) Use tabs and/or dividers

OFFERORS ARE HEREBY ON NOTICE, A FAILURE TO SUBMIT ALL THE REQUIRED

DOCUMENTATION IN THE MANNER (TIMELINESS AND FORMAT) SPECIFIED IN THE

SOLICITATION INSTRUCTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED NON-RESPONSIVE AND MAY NOT BE

FURTHER CONSIDERED FOR THIS COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT.

L.A.3.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS:

Clearly mark electronic files with the solicitation number and markings required as stated above. The submission date for all Volumes shall be no later than the date and time specified in Block 9 of Standard Form 33 of the RFP.

Offerors shall submit all proposals via DoD SAFE located at https://safe.apps.mil/ to the personnel listed below.

Offeror shall not submit proposals by United States Postal Service, commercial carrier, facsimile or electronica mail (email).

Army Contracting Command – Orlando Army Contracting Command - Orlando ATTN: Rebeca Gonzalez, Contract Specialist Attn: Jason Jerome, Contracting Officer 12211 Science Drive 12211 Science Drive Orlando, FL 32826-3725 Orlando, FL 32826-3725 Solicitation Number: W900KK-20 R-0001 Solicitation Number: W900KK-20-R-0001

Rebeca.a.gonzalez.civ@mail.mil Jason.jerome3.civ@mail.mil Ph 407-384-3968 Ph 407-208-5868

Proposals are due NLT 2:00pm EST (1600 UTC) on Aug 13, 2020. Submission time is based on drop-off date and time as recorded by DoD SAFE site.

Offerors are hereby notified that non-Government participant(s) will have access to the offerors’ proposals.

The non-Government participants are contracted employees supporting Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) contract W900KK-17-D-0002, Optimal Solutions and Technologies located at 2101 L St, NW Suite 800, Washington, DC 20037-1657 and ECS Federal, LLC located at 2750 Prosperity Avenue, Suite 600, Fairfax, VA 22031 and support services contract W31P4Q-16-A-0003, Task Order 0002, COLSA Corporation at 6728 Odyssey Drive, Huntsville, AL 35806. They will serve as advisors to the Government and will be authorized access to only the Offeror’s Volume I – Technical/Management Approach, which is necessary to enable them to provide specific advice on Cyber TRIDENT matters. All non-Government personnel have signed certificates of non-disclosure and financial interest, or their equivalent documents. Non-Government participants will participate in an advisory role only and will not be included in any applicable consensus discussion or determination.

L.A.4.0 PROPOSAL PACKAGING: Section Removed.

L.A.5.0 CLASSIFIED DATA

All proposals must be UNCLASSIFIED

L.A.6.0 SOLICITATION CHANGES

For any changes and additional information for the solicitation please go to:

https://beta.SAM.gov

L.A.7.0 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI):

Technical documentation associated with the solicitation will be posted on www.beta.sam.gov along with the solicitation. For security, several of the attachments will require completing a request form with offeror information in order to obtain documentation. Please following instructions provided on the solicitation page on www.beta.sam.gov.

PART B SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS

L.B.1.0 FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL/MANAGEMENT

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to cost or price aspects of the offer.

In this Volume, the Offeror shall describe the technical proficiency, capabilities, and management approach proposed by the Offeror to fulfill the requirements of the solicitation. Throughout this Volume the Offeror shall demonstrate an understanding of the requirements specified in Section L of the RFP, its SOW references and address its risks and associated risk mitigation plans.

The offeror shall provide all information and data required to conduct a thorough and complete technical evaluation in the written proposal and any augmentation to the elements in their voice-over audio brief and its associated PowerPoint presentation file. The offeror shall address the following in the proposal:

TECHNICAL APPROACH

Elements:

L.B.1.1 – Agile Development Operations (DevOps)

A. The offeror shall describe their agile development operations (DevOps) process as well as their approach to improve and innovate the current PCTE agile development process detailing, at a minimum, each of the below tasks:

References: Base SOW-2020-011, Section 3.2 and TO 0002 SOW-2020-011-02, Section 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4

i. Agile DevOps process which takes into consideration the existing Government led Agile process as well as the multi-vendor PCTE environment (e.g. Cyber Innovation Challenge contractors, Government Off the Shelf (GOTS) development teams, University Affiliated Research Centers (UARCS)) and Government functional teams (e.g. Development, Platform Operations, Event Operations).

ii. Improvement of offeror backlog task completion rate (velocity) and reduction of incomplete tasks (user story under-delivery) at sprint reviews.

iii. Methods for improving the tracking and visibility of task dependencies between the offeror and the existing PCTE contractors.

B. The offeror shall describe their approach to improve and innovate the continuous integration / continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline, detailing, at a minimum, each of the below tasks:

References: Base SOW-2020-011, Section 3.2 and TO 0002 SOW-2020-022-02, Section 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4

i. Extent to which the CI/CI pipeline is automated to include number of stages, types of testing and testing technologies.

ii. Tools and techniques used to advance software between stages of pipeline including air gaps.

iii. Ensuring common software baselines across multiple RCSs and classificaion instances.

C. The offeror shall provide a complete description of their approach to develop, integrate and test the PCTE platform capabilities in terms of:

References: DO 0003 SOW-2020-011-03, Secton 3.2 and Appendix A

i. Capability Development

ii. Integration

iii. Delivery

L.B.1.2 – Infrastructure/Platform Operations

The Offeror shall describe their approach to support and innovate the operations and sustainment of the PCTE Platform Regional Compute and Storage (RCS) infrastructure and services. The Offeror's approach shall describe, at a minimum, the below aspects of PCTE RCS infrastructure and Platform Operations:

References: Base SOW Section 3.2.5.8, 3.2.7, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, TO 0001 SOW-2020-011-01, Section 3.2

i. Infrastructure and configuration management to support rapid CI/CD, automatic scaling and load balancing of existing PCTE contractor’s software across RCS instances.

ii. Methods and tools used for error reporting and platform monitoring.

iii. Method or technique for collecting user feedback to improve the PCTE application

L.B.1.3 – Cybersecurity Posture

The Offeror shall describe their process for securing the system, maintaining patch compliance, and monitoring the PCTE platform, including any improvements they would apply to the current system. In addition to best practices, the Offeror shall describe their process and methodology for maintaining the integrity of the PCTE platform against a variety of threats. The Offerors shall describe their solutions to these PCTE challenges and issues detailing, at a minimum, each of the below tasks:

References: Base SOW-2020-011, Section 3.2 and 3.4, TO 0001 SOW-2020-011-01, Section 3.3, TO 0002 SOW- 2020-02, Section 3.4 and DO 0003 SOW 2020-03, Section 3.3.

i. Storage and risk evaluation of malware before allowing it to run in the environment to prevent cyber hazards from breaching their boundaries.

ii. Protecting the user facing portion of the PCTE platform

iii. Protecting vendor intellectual propoerty from insider threats.

iv. Maintaining patch compliance and secure operations of the PCTE platform installed at data classifications to include Unclassified, Secret and Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI).

MANAGEMENT APPROACH

L.B.1.4 – Third Party Integration and Coordination

The Offeror shall describe their process for coordinating, collaborating, and innovating in a multi-vendor environment by maximizing and enhancing third party organization's technology and capabilities into the PCTE program to include:

References: Base SOW-2020-011, Sections 3.1 and 3.2, TO 0001 SOW-2020-011, Section 3.1.2 and TO 0002, SOW-2020-011, Section 3.1 and .3.2

i. Description of innovation or novel tools and techniques used to enable integration with external capabilities.

ii. Description of how third party organizations and contractors providing PCTE technology insertion will be incorporated into the Agile DevOps process previously described in the offeror’s proposal.

L.B.1.5 – Transition Plan

The Offeror shall describe a detailed transition plan that documents how the Offeror will take responsibility of operations and be fully operational to meet the requirements described in the SOW, and at a minimum, include the following:

References: Base SOW-2020-011, Section 3.1.9.1 and 3.1.9.2

i. Description of transition plan, to include integration factory with related milestones/activities with a schedule for project and contract management among existing PCTE contractors and a checklist of required activities.

ii. Detailed plan of Senseitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) implementation with a checklist of required activities for completion of the SCIF.

L.B.1.6 – Management

A. The Offeror shall describe an overall management approach to meet responsibilities and deadlines to include the proposed organizational team structure and working relationships and agreements with partners, subcontrators, the Government, and members of the PCTE user representatives as defined by the following at a minimum:

References: Base SOW-2020-011, Section 3.1 and 3.6

i. Organizational structure demonstrates alignment to interrelationships of PCTE critical program activities

ii. Plan for regular interaction with the PCTE end users that indicates mature knowledge of the user organizational structure and the Offeror's plan to maintain operational relevance for PCTE.

iii. Description of how the offeror intends to administer and control delivery order resource allocation among multiple concurrent delivery orders and core software integration tasks.

iv. Labor Categories, to include education and qualifying experience, with assoicated hours for

Task/Delivery Ordrs 0001, 0002 and 0003. In addition, provide same information for labor categories proposed with the Labor Rate Table not associated with these orders, but included in the table.

B. The offeror shall describe a detailed plan for managing material and facilities associated with the PCTE program to include the following, at a minimum:

References: TO 0001, SOW‐2020‐011‐01, Section 3.4 and DO 0003, SOW‐2020‐022‐02, Section 3.4

i. Procure, maintain and renew software licenses for Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) tools, applications and development products.

ii. Detailed plan to esnure a cost effective approach to evaluating system licensing usage to better enable the Government to make smart licensing procurement decisions.

iii. Implementation and Maintenance of an automated supply managmenet and accountability process for

Government Furnished Equipment (GFE).

L.B.2.0 FACTOR 2 –COST/PRICE PROPOSAL

The Cost/Pricing Data shall be provided by the offeror to enable the Government to perform cost/price analysis and ultimately enable the Government to conduct the analysis IAW FAR 15.404-1. The offeror is required to support and submit cost and pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 (a certificate of cost or pricing data (as defined at FAR 2.101) is not required for competitive acquisition unless adequate competition does not exist). Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details, in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. In addition, any narrative that the offeror feels will clarify the proposal beyond the information required can be submitted as part of the cost proposal.

The Cost/Price Volume shall consist of both a narrative providing the pricing content listed below in Sections a. through d. and the cost/price data as stated below demonstrating the computation and buildup of the total proposed costs by cost element in both total and by CLIN for each of the items listed below..

The content for the cost/price volume shall include the following information. (The offeror shall provide rationale for any information not included)

a. List of all major subcontractor or team members (as defined in Section Part A. L.2.0) with cage codes;

b. For Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basic Contract CLINs 0001, 0002, 0003, 0005 (attachment 4), 0012 and 0013, provide in the cost/price volume as stated below for each CLIN:

i. Post Award Conference (FFP CLIN 0001 of Basic IDIQ): The offeror shall propose in the cost/price volume a unit price for the Post Award Conference as designated in Section B of the solicitation.

Post Award Conference, 1 each $___________________

ii. Contract Data Requirements List (CDRLs) (FFP CLIN 0002 of the Basic IDIQ) The offeror shall propose in the cost/price volume a unit price for CDRLs A001, B001, B002 and B003 as designated in Section B of the solicitation.

Contractor’s Risk Management Plan, A001, DI-MGMT-81808 1 each, $______________ Software Development Plan (SDP), B001, DI-IPSC-81427B, 1 each, $___________ Operations Security (OPSEC) Plan, B002, DI-MGMT-80934C, 1 each, $_________________ System Security Plan, B003, DI-MGMT-82247, 1 each $____________________.

iii. Task Order 0001, Infrastructure and Maintenance (IAW Base Contract CLIN 0003): The offeror shall propose in the cost/price volume monthly FFP unit prices for contract years one through five along with the total prices filled in using the estimated quantities as designated below. Infrastructure and maintenance pricing includes providing the 24 hour, 95% availability of support IAW SOW-2020-011-01 for TO 0001, to include a 95% maintenance support of all Regional Compute Storage (RCS) equipment at all sites listed in Attachment 10.

Availability time does not include time missed due to unavailability of RCS fielded facilities, network non-connectivity, or awaiting Government provided replacement parts. These times are deleted from the platform availability time.

Contract Year 1 Monthly Unit Price $_____________ x 9 months = $_____________ Contract Year 2 Monthly Unit Price $____________ x 12 months = $_____________ Contract Year 3 Monthly Unit Price $_____________ x 12 months = $_____________ Contract Year 4 Monthly Unit Price $____________ x 12 months = $_____________ Contract Year 5 Monthly Unit Price $_____________ x 12 months = $_____________

The offeror shall propose the FFP unit prices, multiplied by the number of months for each base contract year for an extended price. The Government reserves the right to place an order for Infrastructure and Maintenance services for increments of a month, but for less than an entire contract year.

In addition to the FFP unit prices and extended prices, the offeror shall submit sufficient supporting data in the cost/price volume to enable the Government to understand how the proposed FFP amounts were developed and to perform price realism analysis. All pricing and estimating techniques should be clearly explained in detail (Breakdown of prices, basis of estimates, historical data utilized, etc). For this analysis, the Government is not conducting an in-depth cost analysis or verifying each and every item as reasonable in performing its price realism analysis instead the Government is evaluating the top level cost elements for each unit price to determine if its realistic. All techniques should support the proposed amounts in such a manner that computation and understanding can be accomplished.

Offerors shall provide in Attachment 17, Cost Proposal Spreadsheet, Tab A – Infrastructure & Maintenance, top level cost elements information of the offeror’s proposed unit price for each line items, including indirect cost proposed. The offeror shall include as a part of the cost breakdown the following information:

- Direct Labor categories and associated labor hours for each CLIN price proposed;

- Material listing by CLIN unit price and its associated costs;

- Other direct cost proposed and a description of the cost;

- Indirect (in total for the unit price) cost proposed for the task order.

For purposes of the price realism analysis, the offerors’ price proposal shall delineate, in a spreadsheet, all cost elements associated with their proposal. Price realism pertains to the offeror’s ability to project costs which are reasonable, which indicate that the offeror understands the work to be performed, and is consistent with the effort described in the technical proposal, and assess the degree to which the price proposal reflects the likelihood (risk) that the offeror will provide the supplies or services at the proposed price.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .