Attachment 0024 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
PDF 328 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation AFM III East & West
- Solicitation number
- W58RGZ-26-R-0008
About this file
This is a Past Performance Assessment questionnaire issued by the U.S. Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal (ACC-RSA) in support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W58RGZ-26-R-0008. The questionnaire is designed to collect performance information from previous government, state, local, or commercial contract customers of offerors competing for the contract. Responses must be submitted to ACC-RSA ATTN: CCAM-AVA-D (Ms. Antionette R. McClinton) no later than 15 days after receipt of the request or the RFP closing date, whichever occurs first. Submissions may be made electronically to usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-afm-iii-east@army.mil or usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-afm-iii-west@army.mil, with questions directed to Mrs. McClinton at (520) 674-8258.
The questionnaire contains two primary assessment formats: a written questionnaire and a telephone interview template, both evaluating contractor performance across five key criteria using a four-point rating scale (Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, and No Confidence). Assessment areas include: compliance of products, services, documents, and deliverables to specification requirements and standards of good workmanship; effectiveness of project management including subcontractor control; timeliness of performance for services and product deliverables; effectiveness in forecasting and controlling estimated costs; and commitment to customer satisfaction and business-like concern for customers' interests. Each response requires a written rationale. The questionnaire also requests general comments, identification of other relevant past efforts by the company, and respondent identification information. This is a template document designed to standardize past performance evaluation for the stated RFP.
View the file
Other files
Show all 49
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-REDSTONE ARSENAL
5303 MARTIN ROAD
REDSTONE ARSENAL, AL 35898-5000
CCAM-AVA-D
MEMORANDUM FOR
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W58RGZ-26-R-0008
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal (ACC-RSA) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate Offerors on subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we are requesting that Offerors provide information about their past performance recent and relevant federal, state or local government or commercial contracts as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 488190. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the ACC-RSA, ATTN: CCAM-AVA-D (Ms Antionette R.
McClinton), Building 3777 Maintenance Row, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5280, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or closing date of RFP, whichever occurs first. Your questionnaire may be submitted electronically to: usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-afm-iii-east@army.mil or usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-afm-iii-west@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to Mrs. Antionette McClinton at (520) 674-8258.
Sincerely, Antionette McClinton Contracting Officer mailto:usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-afm-iii-east@army.mil mailto:usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-afm-iii-east@army.mil mailto:usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-afm-iii-west@army.mil
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successful in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Satisfactory Confidence
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Telephone Interview
Contractor: Contract No.:
Subcontract No. (if applicable):
POC: Title:
(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM) (Agency, Telephone No., E-mail & Facsimile No.)
If conducting a telephone interview:
“Hello, I am ______________________. I am calling in reference to Contract ____________________ with a company called ________________________. My questions will pertain to the contractor’s record of past, which is defined as within the past three years, and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. A summary of this discussion may be sent to you for your records.
Please provide examples and/or explanations, and utilize the following ratings:
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successful in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
*Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
E-mail Address:
PART II. RECORD OF INTERVIEW (To be completed by PPT Member)
( ) Discussed recentness and relevance of information ( ) Read summary to person contacted Date:
( ) Sent copy to person contacted Date:
PPT Member Signature Typed or Printed Name
Telephone Fax
| 2026-03-31T07:50:24-0500 | |
| MCCLINTON.ANTIONETTE.ROSS.1296858400 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .