Attachment_1-_MA_IDIQ_PRS.pdf
PDF 103 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W58RGZ-15-R-0166
About this file
Attachment 1 MA IDIQ PRS
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE ‐
SEE FAR 3.104 FOUO (DRAFT)
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY MATRIX
PERFORMANCE
OBJECTIVE
PERFORMANCE
STANDARD
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY
LEVEL (AQL)
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
RATING
The contractor will actively participate in their respective pool by providing responses to Task Order Requests for Proposals (TORFPs).
Contractors residing within the competitive pool(s) (Restricted or Unrestricted) will be required to submit proposals to TORFP solicitations throughout the period.
Contractors with an active (awarded) Task Order are not required to propose on all TORFPs.
Contractor must meet the Satisfactory Performance Rating.
100% Inspection EXCEPTIONAL Proposals were received 90% of time.
VERY GOOD
Proposals were received 80% of time.
SATISFACTORY
Proposals were received 70% of time.
MARGINAL
Proposals were received 60% of time.
UNSATISFACTORY
Proposals were received less than 60% of time.
OBJECTIVE
PERFORMANCE
STANDARD
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY
LEVEL (AQL)
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
The contractor will provide timely responses to TORFPs.
Contractors residing within the competitive pool(s) (Restricted or Unrestricted) will submit intent to bid or no bid notifications within 5 days in the time specified in the TORFPs.
Proposals submitted in response to TORFP solicitations will be submitted will be required on time.
Contractor must meet the Satisfactory Performance Rating.
100% Inspection SATISFACTORY 90% of intent to bid or no bid notifications were received on time.
UNSATISFACTORY
Less than 90% of intent to bid or no bid notifications were received on time.
SATISFACTORY
90% of proposals were received on time.
UNSATISFACTORY
Less than 90% of proposals were
OBJECTIVE
PERFORMANCE
STANDARD
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY
LEVEL (AQL)
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
Contractors are required to provide timely responses to USG Requests for Information (RFI).
Contractors residing within the competitive pool(s) (Restricted or Unrestricted) will be required to submit RFI responses within the time specified in the Contracting Officers letter(s).
Contractor must meet the Satisfactory Performance Rating.
100% Inspection. SATISFACTORY 90% of RFI responses were received on time.
UNSATISFACTORY
Less than 90% of RFI responses were
OBJECTIVE
PERFORMANCE
STANDARD
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY
LEVEL (AQL)
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
required to provide realistic and reasonable Cost/Price proposals.
Contractors residing within the competitive pool(s) (Restricted or Unrestricted) will be required to submit proposals to Task Order solicitations throughout the ordering period.
Contractors’ TO Cost/Price proposals will be realistic and reasonable IAW FAR 15.404‐1.
Contractor must meet the Satisfactory Performance Rating.
100% Inspection. SATISFACTORY 100% of TO Cost/Price proposals are determined to be realistic and reasonable
IAW FAR 15.404‐1.
UNSATISFACTORY
Less than 100% of TO Cost/Price proposals are determined to be realistic and reasonable
IAW FAR 15.404‐1.
OBJECTIVE
PERFORMANCE
STANDARD
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY
LEVEL (AQL)
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
required to provide a Quality Proposal.
Contractors residing within the competitive pool(s) (Restricted or Unrestricted) will be required to submit proposals to Task Order solicitations throughout the period. TO RFP Technical Approach is complete, a quality product, and meets the criteria IAW the Source Selection guide, paragraph 3.1.2.2 table 3.
Contractor must meet the Satisfactory Performance Rating to ensure continued placement with Competitive Pool.
100% Inspection. EXCEPTIONAL Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements.
VERY GOOD
Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements.
SATISFACTORY
Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.
MARGINAL
Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.
UNSATISFACTORY
Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus is unacceptable.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .