A01 - Attachment 0008 - Solicitation Tables_DCGS-A CD 2_26JUN2019.pdf
PDF 281 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FORMAL SOLICITATION - Distributed Common Ground System - Army Capability Drop 2 Data Fabric and Analytics
- Solicitation number
- W56KGY-19-R-0007
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for a multiple award indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract to provide Distributed Common Ground System - Army Capability Drop 2 Data Fabric and Analytics solutions. The Army seeks to upgrade components in its DCGS-A intelligence analysis system to dynamically ingest data from multiple sources with common interfaces, enable data discovery, and provide centralized data receipt, processing, refinement, management, storage, and access. The contract will have a four-year base period and a three-year option period, with orders issued on a firm-fixed price basis. The minimum guaranteed value is $3,500 and the total potential contract value is $823,263,105.82. Questions regarding this solicitation are due by August 2, 2019 and should be submitted to the specified Army Contracting Command email addresses.
Solicitation Section J Attachments/Exhibits
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (See FAR 2.101 and 3.104)
SOLICITATION TABLES
FOR
Distributed Common Ground System – Army (DCGS-A) Capability Drop (CD) 2 – Data Fabric and Analytics
Solicitation Number: W56KGY-19-R-0007
26 June 2019
Project Manager (PM) DCGS-A 6580 Surveillance Loop, Building 6006 Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005
Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings
Table 2. Technical Findings Definitions
Table 3. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings
Rating Definition
Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Color Rating Adjectival Rating Description
Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable.
Proposal is unawardable.
Significant Strength An aspect of an Offerors’ proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.
Strength An aspect of an Offerors’ proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.
Weakness A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.
Significant Weakness A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.
Deficiency A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.
Table 4. Past Performance Assessment Ratings
Rating Definition
Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.
Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Table 5. Requirements for Submission of Proposal Materials
* Selection one (1) of the multiple versions offered.
** If the Offeror has both plan types, please submit both.
*** Page Count refers to MS PowerPoint slide count.
NOTE: Pages and slides that exceed the required maximum limitations will not be evaluated.
Additional pages and slides over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.
Volume Title File Name MS Word Version
MS Excel Version
MS
PowerPoint
Version PDF Version Maximum
Page Count
I - Executive Summary - - - - - - -
Proposal Summary "PROP_SYN" X* - - X* 10 Commercial Item
Assertions "COMM_ITEM_ASSERT" X* - - X* N/A
Glossary of Abbreviations and
Acronyms
"GLOSSARY" X* - - X* N/A
Award Documents/ Certifications/
Representations
"AWARDDOC_CERT_REP" X* X* - X* N/A
Commercial Plan or Subcontracting Plan** "CP" or "SBP" X* - - X* N/A
Data Assertions "DATA_ASSERT" - X - - N/A
II - Technical Factor Technical Solution Oral Presentation "TECH_PRESENTATION" - - X - 15***
III - Price Factor TEP Worksheet "TOTAL_EVAL_PRICE" - X - - N/A
IV - Past Performance Past Performance Record "PAST_PERF" X* - - X* N/A
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .