Attachment 0002 Past Performance Questionnaire rev 01.docx

Attachment 0002 Past Performance Questionnaire Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Please return within 3 days. Thank you.

PART I. (To be Completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number/Task Order:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:

Place of Performance:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

FAX Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

Rating Scale

In each of the following sections you will find questions where you are asked to rate some aspect of performance on a scale in the below ranges. If possible, PLEASE INCLUDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE RATING. The criterion for each rating is described below:

Outstanding: Superior performance with inconsequential exceptions.

Good: Outstanding performance with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.

Acceptable: Generally satisfactory performance, but with occasional exceptions. In most cases, exceptions had minor consequences.

Marginal: Occasional unsatisfactory performance with significant consequences in some cases.

Unsatisfactory: Generally unsatisfactory performance, with significant consequences in many cases.

PART II. EVALUATION (To be Completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

1. Compliance with Technical Data Package (TDP) To what extent was the contractor compliant in following a TDP? Did the contractor comply with all drawing requirements, unless a deviation from the drawings was approved by the Government? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:

2. Quality Management - Standards of Good Workmanship, Final Inspection, and Delivery To what extent was the contractor compliant in standards of good workmanship, i.e. quality controls, adhering to paint or welding requirements, satisfying the performance requirement? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:

3. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

To what extent was the contractor effective in managing the program, including its employees and subcontractors, on an overall basis? Control of subcontractors includes the selection and management as well as the verification of a final product from a subcontractor. Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:

4. Effectiveness of Management of Program/Project Schedule (to include use and control of subcontractors).

To what extent was the contractor effective in managing the program/project schedule, to include any controls put in place to manage the schedule and on an overall basis? Were projects managed effectively from beginning to end to meet the initial period of performance? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:

5. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

To what extent did the contractor adhere to the delivery schedules, on an overall basis? Did the contractor effectively manage the ordering and delivery of required materials to complete on schedule? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:

6. Controlled Costs within Contracted Totals.

Did the contractor effectively manage to control costs on contract? Were requests for over and above work fair and reasonable? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:

7. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest To what extent was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction and its customers’ interest?

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:

8. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.