Modification_Document_W564KV-16-R-0034-0001_(29Jul16).pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Post the questions from Industry w ith their answ ers and to:

2. Remove the page limit from Volume I;

3. Modify PWS paragraphs 1.6.2. and 1.6.5.;

4. Remove 52.215-8, update 52.212-1 and 52.212-2;

5. Update ELINs A203, A204, A208, and A209 on the Price Sheets; and

6. Provide clearer versions of Exhibits 4-8 and 4-9, additional task order samples, and camp building guide.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 29-Jul-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W564KV-16-R-0034

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Jun-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

29-Jul-2016

CODE

TCC-KAISERSLAUTERN

THEATER CONTRACTING CENTER

BLDG. 3233, KLEBER KASERNE

MANNHEIMER STR. 238

67657 KAISERSLAUTERN

GERMANY

W564KV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W564KV-16-R-0034

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been added by full text:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. RFP QUESTIONS: Questions shall be submitted electronically ONLY to Richard Van De Linde, Contract Specialist, richard.vandelinde.civ@mail.mil AND Ms. Brigitte F. Bryant, Contracting Officer, at brigitte.f.bryant.civ@mail.mil. The subject of the e-mail(s) shall be W564KV-16-R-0034 – Rotational Exercise Logistic Support, and shall be received not later than (NLT) 1700 CET, 20 July 2016. Follow-up/additional questions will not be accepted after this date. Answers to submitted questions will be provided via a RFP amendment. No fax or facsimile or telephonic questions will be accepted.

2. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION: Proposals shall be submitted via email to the POCs above. The proposal shall be submitted in a format that is compatible with MS Word or MS Excel 2000 or higher. The firewall utilized by the Government contracting office does not authorize or accept ZIP files. The offeror is responsible for ensuring delivery to the POC. Receipt of emails with attachments larger than 10MB (total) are not likely to be allowed through the firewall. Accordingly, proposals may be provided via multiple emails. Each email will be titled “Proposal for Solicitation W564KV-16-R-0034, Message X of X.” The Government will not be responsible for late submissions due to transmission problems. If any portion of the electronic proposal/quote is not received on time, the whole proposal will be considered late and therefore may not be evaluated. No proposals/quotes received by FAX will be accepted. Offeror shall provide Points of Contact (POC) for your company, a telephone number, and your DUNS number.

3. AWARD TYPE: The Government intends to award a Single, Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for one (1) base 12 month ordering period with four 12 month option ordering periods to meet the requirement. Required Ordering Period is anticipated to begin on 13 September 2016, through 12 September 2021. All payments will be made through Wide Area Workflow (WAWF).

4. Offerors shall submit a proposal that is legible and comprehensive enough to provide the basis for a sound evaluation by the Government. Information provided shall be precise, factual, and complete. Legibility, clarity, completeness, and responsiveness are of the utmost importance.

5. NEGOTIATIONS/DISCUSSIONS: The Government intends to award without discussions. Offerors should provide their best, complete proposal, upon initial submission. The Government reserves the right to hold discussions and negotiations if deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

PARAGRAPH (b) OF FAR 52.212-1 IS SUPPLEMENTED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Detailed Proposal Instructions. All proposals, questions, and correspondence, SHALL BE submitted in the ENGLISH language and all pricing in EUROS only. Offers submitted in a language other than English and a currency that is not in EUROS will not be evaluated. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited. Offeror’s proposal information shall be confined to the appropriate volume to facilitate independent evaluation. Proposals that do not follow these guidelines or that do not include the requested minimum information may be eliminated from further consideration for award.

2. Proposal Format and Content. Except as designated in the Addendum to FAR Clause 52.212-2, the Government will evaluate the proposal using only the information provided with the proposal. Failure of an offeror to submit detailed information sufficient to evaluate the offer as stipulated herein may result in a rating of unacceptable.

3. The submission shall be clearly indexed, logically assembled, and clearly identified. A page, for purposes of this solicitation, is defined as one side of standard sized sheet of paper (US letter 8.5” x 11” or European A4 8.3” x 11.7”), Times New Roman, font size (12), proportional spacing permissible, 1 inch margin (European 2.54cm) on all sides, single spaced. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by solicitation number in the header and/or footer. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. A Table of Contents shall be created which outlines the contractor’s proposal submission. Information printed on charts and graphs may be a smaller font; however, the charts and graphs must be clearly legible, regardless of font size. For ease of reference, consecutive page numbering is requested. Only the Pricing Exhibit shall contain price information. For the pricing proposal, the Microsoft Excel files shall remain unlocked and numbers shall not be hard coded. Offerors shall not change the formulas within the Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet provided by the Government. All other proposal parts shall be void of price information. Page limit for Volumes II, III, and IV is not more than 50 pages. Volume I does not have a page limit. Past Performance Questionnaires included in Volume IV are not included in the page count.

4. The proposal shall be organized into four volumes as described below.

a. Volume I. The signed and dated Synopsis / Solicitation along with any applicable amendments plus:

(1) A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3.

(2) Proof of SAMS Registration.

(3) FAR 52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (Jan 2011).

(4) DFARS 252.229-7001 ALT I Tax Relief (only complete this clause if applicable).

(5) FAR 52.228-3 Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act) (Jul 2014) (Offerors must indicate whether their proposals include DBA insurance.)

(6) FAR 52.228-4 Workers’ Compensation and War-Hazard Insurance Overseas.

b. Volume II. Technical Factor: The technical factor ratings reflect the acceptability or unacceptability of the offeror’s proposal and will be evaluated using the ratings below. Each proposal shall contain the information required for evaluation in accordance with the evaluation factors and criteria identified in the solicitation. Offers that do not conform to the requirements of the Solicitation may be rejected without further evaluation, deliberation, or discussion. The offeror shall clearly identify all teaming arrangements, as applicable. The teaming arrangements shall include all subcontractors and supply vendors to be used in the performance of the resulting contract. In order for the Government to determine a proposal to be technically acceptable, the following technical information shall be submitted:

(1) Technical Subfactor 1.1 – Prior experience. The offeror shall provide evidence of its firm, or proposed teaming partner firms, having a minimum of two years of prior relevant logistical support experience, within the past five years of the date of the solicitation posting, for each of the following elements (a-f) as they relate to providing logistic support for field training or mission rehearsal exercises:

(a) Project Management

(b) Shuttle Bus and On-Call Transportation Services

(c) Distribution and Issuance of Various Supply Items

(d) Field Dining, Food Service Facility Management, and Food Preparation, inclusive of associated personnel

(e) Field Equipment Acquisition and Management

(f) Field Laundry, Shower and hand-wash facilities.

The offeror shall provide evidence of its logistical support experience by identifying its recent and relevant contracts. For each contract, the offeror shall provide the following substantiating information:

i. Specific logistic support contract services provided

ii. Name of contracting organization

iii. Contract number

iv. Number of years providing specific service

v. Contract type total contract value

vi. Description of the field training or mission rehearsal environment, or how the experience is similar to field training or mission rehearsal environment

vii. Explanation of how this prior experience is relevant to this solicitation and the resultant contract

viii. Contracting officer’s name and telephone number

NOTE: relevant logistical support experience means that it is of similar to the work contemplated under this PWS in terms of type, complexity, and magnitude (minimum of €13,000,000 combined total annual value), and it was experience obtained within the past five years of the date of the solicitation posting.

(2) Technical Subfactor 1.2 – Technical / Management Capability. The offeror shall submit its technical/management information detailing:

(a) its management plan, procedures, and policies to manage personnel according to all requirements of the PWS;

(b) how it will manage the overall contract in order to ensure the required quality and quantity of services are provided in an efficient and timely manner to meet critical deadlines, meet unexpected changes that will require the contractor to perform under constrained time frames IAW the PWS;

(c) a description of the firm’s ability to provide all required services for critical mission rehearsal exercises.

Each of the three elements of the offeror’s technical/management plan listed above (a-c) must be demonstrated by addressing each of the following points (i-v):

i. Teaming arrangements and allocation of responsibilities as applicable.

ii. Knowledge of the local requirements to operate.

iii. Ability to obtain all the needed clearances to work on post.

iv. Ability to obtain and maintain all required licenses and certifications. At a minimum, for the purpose of proposal evaluation, the offeror’s plan shall demonstrate a plan that specifically addresses: (1) EU or US Army Food Handler certifications, and (2) ADR- Schulungsbescheinigung for Fuel and Class V ammunition.

v. Ability to manage Government Property IAW FAR Part 45.

c. Volume III. Past Performance Factor: Offeror shall submit a record of past performance over the last three years of the date of the solicitation posting. The record of past performance shall be limited to contracts which are relevant to size, scope, and complexity of the procurement under consideration as defined in provision 52.212-2.

The Government will evaluate the quality of an offeror’s relevant past performance in order to determine whether that performance demonstrates a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. For the purposes of determining relevancy, the Government may aggregate or consider together the performance of multiple, separate requirements at the same time by a single offeror. Offeror shall include any contracts listed under the Experience Technical Subfactor as a source of past performance, and may include other past performance similar to the procurement under consideration. Offeror shall be understood to be the prime contractor and shall identify any applicable subcontractor performing 25% of services under the contract line items in the Schedule. Offeror shall submit the following information for its and its applicable subcontractors’ past performance per current or past contracts:

(1) Section 1 – Contract Descriptions: This section shall include information and detail of service experience for the offeror and any intended subcontractors in the format below:

(a) Government agency or commercial entity name.

(b) Contract number (if applicable).

(c) Description of services performed. Also relate scope and magnitude of these services performed to this requirement.

(d) Place(s) of performance.

(e) Total contract value/value of work performed.

(f) Period of Performance.

(g) Point of Contact at the office that awarded the contract, to include: name, telephone, fax number and email address, if available.

(2) Section 2 - Past Performance: Offeror shall provide a brief but thorough narrative explanation of each contract listed in “Section 1 - Contract Descriptions,” detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. For all contracts identified in Section 1 above, the offeror will send Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment 3) to the references identified in Section 1 (g) above. The narrative shall address the following Subfactors of Past Performance:

(a) Cost control

(b) Quality of work

(c) Compliance with performance schedules

(d) Ability to accomplish work in the required time

NOTE: Past Performance Questionnaires shall be emailed to the POCs identified above in paragraph "1. RFP QUESTIONS", and must be received by the synopsis/solicitation closing date.

d. Volume IV. Price Offer.

(1) Price Exhibits – Offeror shall complete the provided Price Exhibits using the provided Excel spreadsheet.

Complete the pricing exhibits as follows:

(a) Estimating Techniques and Methods – when responding to the Price Proposal requirements in the solicitation, the Offeror may use any generally accepted estimating technique to develop its proposal.

(b) Pricing assumptions – Summarize all significant pricing assumptions, scope limitations, exceptions and /or qualifications of the Price Proposal.

(c) Cost or Pricing Information Requirements – In accordance with FAR 15.402, 15.403-1(b) and 15.403-3(a), “information other than cost or pricing data” may be required to support price reasonableness. If, after receipt of proposals, the Contracting Officer determines that there is insufficient information available to determine the reasonableness of the proposed pricing, the Offeror shall be required to submit additional information other than cost or pricing data. If, during the evaluation process, the Contracting Officer determines that adequate competition no longer exists, then cost or pricing data may be required.

(2) Do not complete Solicitation Section B with pricing information. All pricing will be contained in the Price Exhibits and the Pricing Summary.

(3) This solicitation does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of offeror’s proposal(s) or in making any necessary studies for the preparation thereof, or for any visit the Contracting Officer may request for the purpose of clarification of the proposal or for preparation for negotiations.

PARAGRAPH (c) OF FAR 52.212-1 IS REPLACED AS FOLLOWS:

Period for Acceptance of Proposals/Offers. The suppliers/offeror agrees to hold the prices in its proposal firm for 150 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of proposals/offers.

PARAGRAPH (f) OF FAR 52.212-1 IS SUPPLEMENTED AS FOLLOWS:

Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers: Offeror is responsible for submitting offers, and any modifications, revisions, or withdrawals, so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified in the solicitation IAW FAR 15.208, Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals. The time specified in the solicitation for receipt of offers is local time, Central European Summer Time (CEST), Kaiserslautern, Germany.

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

BASIS FOR AWARD:

1. This is a competitive source selection using a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process. The Government anticipates awarding a contract resulting from this Solicitation under FAR Parts 12 and 15 to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the Solicitation and whose offer represents the best value to the Government using a LPTA source selection process. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price meeting the technical acceptability and past performance acceptability standards as described in the solicitation.

a. Technical acceptability will be based on a contractor submitting an offer that complies with all of the requirements listed in the Solicitation and Performance Work Statement (PWS). A contractor's ability to comply with all of the requirements listed in the Solicitation and PWS is met when they have received an "acceptable" rating on all technical factors and subfactors. An unacceptable rating for any technical subfactor will result in an overall unacceptable rating for the technical factor.

b. Past performance acceptability will be based on a contractor having satisfactory past performance. A contractor's ability to meet all of the past performance requirements listed in the Solicitation is met when they have received an "acceptable" rating. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a) (2) (iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, unknown shall be considered “acceptable.”

2. Evaluation Factors.

a. Factor 1 – Technical. The government technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on a pass/fail basis, assigning ratings of Acceptable or Unacceptable for each subfactor and its elements using the following ratings and descriptions:

TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS

Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

(1) Subfactor 1.1 – Prior Experience. The Government will evaluate the offeror's technical experience that its firm, or proposed teaming partner firms, have a minimum of two years of prior relevant logistical support experience within the past five years of the date of the solicitation posting. The Government will evaluate the following elements of Prior Experience as they relate to field training or support of mission rehearsal exercises.

(a) Project Management

(b) Shuttle Bus and On-Call Transportation Services

(c) Distribution and Issuance of Various Supply Items

(d) Field Dining, Food Service Facility Management, and Food Preparation, inclusive of associated personnel

(e) Field Equipment Acquisition and Management

(f) Field Laundry, Shower, and Hand-wash facilities.

The Government will evaluate the above listed elements (a-f) to verify that they are supported by prior relevant logistical support experience as follows:

i. Specific logistic support contract services provided

ii. Name of contracting organization

iii. Contract number

iv. Number of years providing specific service

v. Contract type total contract value

vi. Description of the field training or mission rehearsal environment, or how the experience is similar to field training or mission rehearsal environment

vii. Explanation of how this prior experience is relevant to this solicitation and the resultant contract

viii. Contracting officer’s name and telephone number

NOTE: relevant logistical support experience means that it is similar to the work contemplated under this PWS in terms of type, complexity, and magnitude (minimum of €13,000,000 combined total annual value), and it was experience obtained within the past five years of the date of the solicitation posting.

2) Subfactor 1.2 – Technical/Management Capability. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s technical/management plan to ensure it contains detailed:

(a) procedures and policies to manage personnel according to all the requirements of the PWS.

(b) procedures and policies to manage the overall contract in order to ensure the required quality and quantity of services are provided in an efficient and timely manner, meet critical deadlines, meet unexpected changes that will require the contractor to perform under constrained time frames IAW the PWS.

(c) description of the firm’s ability to provide all required services for critical mission rehearsal exercises.

The Government will evaluate the above listed elements (a-c) to verify that they are supported by the criteria listed below (i-v):

i. Teaming arrangements and allocation of responsibilities as applicable.

ii. Knowledge of the local requirements to operate.

iii. Ability to obtain all the needed clearances to work on post.

iv. Ability to obtain and maintain all required licenses and certifications. At a minimum, for the purpose of proposal evaluation, the offeror’s plan shall demonstrate a plan that specifically addresses: (1) EU or US Army Food Handler certifications, and (2) ADR- Schulungsbescheinigung for Fuel and Class V ammunition.

v. Ability to manage Government Property IAW FAR Part 45.b.

Factor 2 – Past Performance.

(1) Past performance will be evaluated in terms of current and past contract performance, to determine the degree to which an Offeror satisfactorily performed services and satisfied customers. Information presented in the Offeror’s past performance documentation, together with information from the past performance performance questionnaire, and other sources available to the Government, i.e. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS); Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS); and/or Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) will be the basis of evaluation for this factor. The Offeror and any applicable subcontractor shall submit a complete record of past performance within the last three years of the date of the solicitation posting. The Government will evaluate the quality of an offeror’s relevant past performance in order to determine whether that performance demonstrates a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. The quality of relevant past and present performance that is similar to the requirements of this solicitation’s Performance Work Statement and performed within the past three years of the date of the solicitation posting.

Rating: Description:

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)

(2) (iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

(2) The Government assessment will focus on contracts that meet the following conditions:

(a) Recency - Recent is defined as performance during the past three years from the date of issuance of the formal solicitation.

(b) Relevancy – Relevant is defined as contracts performed for exercise logistic support services with an estimated annual value comparable to this requirement.

(3) The Government assessment will evaluate past performance to determine how well the contractor performed on the recent and relevant contracts with regard to the following subfactors of Past Performance:

(a) Cost control

(b) Quality of work

(c) Compliance with performance schedules

(d) Ability to accomplish work in the required time

(4) The past performance evaluation performed in support of this source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.

c. Factor 3 – Price.

(1) The Government will analyze each Offeror’s price proposal by using techniques and procedures described under FAR 15.404-1, Proposal Analysis Techniques. The Offeror’s proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the requirements specified in FAR 52.212-1 and Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 of the Solicitation.

(2) Price Reasonableness and Balance. Each Offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness and balance in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b) and (g). The Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced.

(3) Completeness. The Government will review the pricing submissions for completeness and compliance with FAR 52.212-1 and its addendum. Incomplete price submissions may not be evaluated and the proposal may be eliminated from the competition.

(4) Total Evaluated Price. For the purposes of evaluation, the offeror’s total evaluated price will include the one-year base period, and the four (4) one (1) year option periods for all CLINs, as well as the options available under FAR Clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. To account for the option period(s) possible under Clause 52.217-8 (maximum six months), the Government will take the price for all CLINs of the final option period, prorate it by a six-month value and add it to the sum of all CLINs (base plus all option periods) . This amount will be the total evaluated price. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the options.

The following have been deleted:

52.215-8 Order of Precedence--Uniform Contract Format OCT 1997

(End of Summary of Changes)