W52P1J-20-R-0063 0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Cost Plus Fixed Fee

0003 2021MAY17

W52P1J

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - RI

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000

BLDGS 60 & 62

SHAUN Y. PETERSON

EMAIL: SHAUN.Y.PETERSON.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W52P1J-20-R-0063

2021APR01

X

X 2021JUN02 04:30pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 29

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: SHAUN Y. PETERSON

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCRI-VG/(309)782-7430

Type of Contract 1: Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Type of Contract 2: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Service Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

The purpose of Amendment 0003 to Solicitation # W52P1J-20-R-0063 is to:

1. Incorporate Updated Attachment 0025 - Carson TD-02 Density List. Changes listed below:

- Changed name from "Carson TD-02 Density List" to "Carson TD-02 Workload Data and Density List"

- Now includes all anticipated supply and transportation transactional workload per month broken out by CLIN

2. Update Section L narrative paragraph L.5.2.1.1(b)

From:

The Offeror's Staffing and Management Plan must detail the Offerors approach, to include a visual representation (i.e. organizational diagram), to deliver services required in the RFP and PWS. The Offerors SMP must detail the overarching methodology used to determine the proposed skill sets / skill level; the SMP must also contain any rational used to support staffing decisions with any explanations needed to clarify staffing decisions (e.g. cross utilization of specific labor categories, dual hatted positions, etc). Additionally, the SMP shall detail its approach to creating its management structure from general staff oversight by first line supervisors through its company headquarters management. This approach shall demonstrate a clear understanding of the requirements related to executing the program by proposing adequate management and supervision. As the Government will utilize the Service Contract Act (SCA) Directory of

Occupations (5th Edition) and TD-01 Historical Workload Data for technical evaluation purposes, the Offeror shall utilize those sources to determine which labor categories/position titles to propose as part of its proposed staffing.

To:

The Offeror's Staffing and Management Plan must detail the Offerors approach, to include a visual representation (i.e. organizational diagram), to deliver services required in the RFP and PWS. The Offerors SMP must detail the overarching methodology used to determine the proposed skill sets / skill level; the SMP must also contain any rational used to support staffing decisions with any explanations needed to clarify staffing decisions Additionally, the SMP shall detail its approach to creating its management structure from general staff oversight by first line supervisors through its company headquarters management. This approach shall detail the management and supervision structure related to executing this effort. As the Government will utilize the Service Contract Act (SCA) Directory of

Occupations (5th Edition) and Attachment 0025 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List for technical evaluation purposes, the Offeror shall utilize those sources whenever possible to determine which labor categories/position titles to propose as part of its proposed staffing.

3. Update Section L narrative paragraph L.5.2.1.1(c)

From:

Staffing/Labor Mix (Attachment 0002 - Staffing/Labor Mix): The Offeror must provide its proposed staffing mix/labor categories (skill sets / skill level, number of employees) in relation to the PWS requirements and the provided historical workload data (see applicable

Technical Data) for both the base period and option periods (fully operational capable 12-month periods (365 day periods)). The

Offeror's proposal must present a staffing approach which demonstrates a thorough understanding of the effort and provides the expected skill sets / skill level of each position, to include level of responsibility in order to successfully perform the specific workload requirements identified at Attachment 0024 TD-01 Historical Workload and meet all the PWS requirements.

NOTE: For Technical evaluation purposes only, the Government will utilize the Service Contract Act (SCA) Directory of Occupations (5th

Edition) labor category definitions to determine if the proposed labor category has the skill set / skill level necessary to perform the required task(s) as identified in L.5.2.1.1(b).

It is further noted that the inclusion of only some of the PWS paragraphs in Attachment 0024 (TD-01 Historical Workload) was for

Technical evaluation purposes only. During contract execution, compliance with all PWS requirements is expected and required.

To:

Staffing/Labor Mix (Attachment 0002 - Staffing/Labor Mix): The Offeror must provide its proposed staffing mix/labor categories (skill sets / skill level, number of employees) in relation to the PWS requirements and Attachment 0025 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List.

(see applicable Technical Data) for both the base period and option periods (fully operational capable 12-month periods (365 day periods)). The Offeror's proposal must present a staffing approach which demonstrates a thorough understanding of the effort and provides the expected skill sets / skill level of each position, to include level of responsibility in order to successfully perform the specific workload requirements identified in Attachment 0025 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List and meet all of the PWS requirements.

2 29

W52P1J-20-R-0063

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The TD-01 Historical Workload is provided only as a reference point to show how similar workload/requirements have historically been accomplished. This TD-01 Historical Workload is not a guarantee of future workload.

NOTE: For Technical evaluation purposes only, the Government will utilize the Service Contract Act (SCA) Directory of Occupations (5th

Edition) to determine if the proposed labor category has the skill set / skill level necessary to perform the required task(s) as identified in L.5.2.1.1(b).

It is further noted that the inclusion of only some of the PWS paragraphs in Attachment 0025 (TD-02 Workload Data and Density List) was for Technical evaluation purposes only. During contract execution, compliance with all PWS requirements is expected and required.

4. Update Section L narrative paragraph L.5.2.1.1(c)(5)(ii)

From:

Functional Labor Category 1 (FLC1): Positions that directly accomplish the tasks/functions of the workload provided in Attachment 0024

TD-01 Historical Workload Data (e.g. mechanic / shop supply clerk in support of the maintenance effort). Note: Leads may be proposed as solely FLC1, if applicable.

To:

Functional Labor Category 1 (FLC1): Positions that directly accomplish the tasks/functions of the workload provided in Attachment 0025

TD-02 Workload Data and Density List (e.g. mechanic / shop supply clerk in support of the maintenance effort).

Note: Leads may be proposed as solely FLC1, if applicable.

5. Update Section L narrative paragraph L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(i)

From:

The Offeror must identify all of its proposed staffing required to support all PWS requirements, specifically those that are both identified at Section 5 of the PWS and Attachment 0024 TD-01 Historical Workload in terms of FTEs and FLC1 or FLC2 on the Staffing/Labor

Mix - Attachment 0002.

To:

The Offeror must identify all of its proposed staffing required to support all PWS requirements, specifically those that are both identified at Section 5 of the PWS and Attachment 0025 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List in terms of FTEs and FLC1 or FLC2 on the

Staffing/Labor Mix - Attachment 0002.

6. Update Section L narrative paragraph L.5.4.2.3.1

From:

Offerors shall complete the Allocation Tab 1b as part of its Attachment 0005 - Cost/Price submission. This worksheet shall allocate the

Offerors total proposal dollars to the appropriate Tasks as shown in Attachment 0024 TD-01 Historical Workload.

To:

Offerors shall complete the Allocation Tab 1b as part of its Attachment 0005 - Cost/Price submission. This worksheet shall allocate the

Offerors total proposal dollars to the appropriate workload data and density lists broken down by CLIN as shown in Attachment 0025 TD-02

Workload Data and Density List.

7. Update Section M narrative paragraph M.5.1.2(c)

From:

Staffing/Labor Mix (Attachment 0002: Staffing/Labor Mix): The Government will evaluate the Offeror's staffing approach to determine if the Offeror's proposed staffing solution meets the following criteria: Note: For Technical evaluation purposes only, the Government will utilize the SCA Directory of Occupations (5th Edition), TD-01 Historical Workload and/or the SMP narrative to determine the skill set / skill level being proposed and to determine whether the proposed laborer can perform the required task(s).

To:

Staffing/Labor Mix (Attachment 0002: Staffing/Labor Mix): The Government will evaluate the Offeror's staffing approach to determine if the Offeror's proposed staffing solution meets the following criteria: Note: For Technical evaluation purposes only, the Government will utilize the SCA Directory of Occupations (5th Edition), TD-02 Historical Workload Data and Density List and/or the SMP narrative to determine the skill set / skill level being proposed and to determine whether the proposed laborer can perform the required task(s).

8. Update Section M narrative paragraph M.5.1.2(c)(1)

From:

Demonstrates an adequate understanding of the effort by providing appropriate staffing that is realistic and feasible to successfully perform the specific workload requirements in Attachment 0024 TD-01 Workload and the PWS requirements identified therein. Staffing

3 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

levels support the provided workload requirements for both the base period and option periods (fully operational capable 12-month / 365 day periods).

Note: For Technical evaluation purposes only, the Government will utilize the labor category definitions provided in the SCA Directory of Occupations (5th Edition), and/or the SMP narrative to determine the skill set / skill level being proposed and to determine whether the proposed laborer can perform the required task(s).

It is further noted that the inclusion of only some of the PWS paragraphs in Attachment 0024 (TD-01 Workload) was for Technical evaluation purposes only. During contract execution, compliance with all PWS requirements is expected and required.

To:

Demonstrates an adequate understanding of the effort by providing appropriate staffing that is realistic and feasible to successfully perform the specific workload requirements in Attachment 0025 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List and the PWS requirements identified therein. Staffing levels support the provided workload requirements for both the base period and option periods (fully operational capable 12-month / 365 day periods).

Note: For Technical evaluation purposes only, the Government will utilize the labor category definitions provided in the SCA Directory of Occupations (5th Edition), and/or the SMP narrative to determine the skill set / skill level being proposed and to determine whether the proposed laborer can perform the required task(s).

9. Incorporate the following paragraph to Sections L:

- L.5.2.1.1(b)(2)(iii)\~The Offeror must clearly identify its onsite quality control approach with direct coordination to the responsible corporate quality office

10. Extend the proposal submission date to 4:30pm Central Time on 02 June 2021.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0004 ***

4 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Number List of Number

Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________

Attachment 0025 CARSON TD-02 WORKLOAD DATA AN DENSITY LIST 13-MAY-2021 013 EMAIL

5 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

L.1.1 These instructions are a guide for preparing a proposal. These instructions describe the type and extent of information required, and emphasizes the significant areas to be addressed in the proposal. Review the Performance Work Statement (PWS) contained in this

Request for Proposal (RFP) for further insight into the areas that must be addressed within the proposal. Include detailed information sufficient to enable the Government evaluators to conduct a meaningful review and make a determination relative to the Offeror's understanding of the requirements in each of the evaluated areas. It is the Government's intent to award a single combination Cost-Plus

Fixed Fee / Firm Fixed Price (Transition-In CLIN and PMO CLINs only) Requirements contract with some non-fee bearing cost elements

(e.g., Other Direct Costs) which are ancillary to the services provided.

L.1.2 In accordance with (IAW) FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors - Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2017), the Government intends to award a contract without discussions. Offerors are cautioned to examine this RFP in its entirety and to ensure that proposals contain all necessary information, provide all required documentation, and are complete in all respects. The Government is not obligated to make another request for the required information nor does the Government assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions in the evaluation process and to permit Offerors to revise proposals, if deemed necessary. During the evaluation process, the Government may request clarifications as needed. Clarifications do not constitute discussions and an Offeror is not allowed to change its proposal in response to a request for clarification. In accordance with FAR 15.306(c)(2), if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Any Offeror eliminated from further consideration will be notified in writing.

L.1.3 Offerors shall submit proposals that will remain valid for not less than 180 days from the required submission date.

L.1.4 Proposals, modifications, revisions, or withdrawals of proposals received after the date established in this RFP for receipt of proposals will be handled IAW FAR Clause 52.215-1.

L.1.5 An Offeror is defined as the prime BOA Holder submitting a proposal under this RFP.

L.1.6 For the purposes of this Task Order RFP, a Joint Venture (JV) is defined as a team of two or more firms that have entered into a legally binding JV agreement. A firm proposing as a JV will be referred to as the Offeror.

L.1.7 Updates related to this Task Order RFP, to include the RFP, amendments, notices, and other information, will be posted to Contract

Opportunities as stated in Section A, Paragraph A.13. Offerors are advised to continuously monitor Contract Opportunities website for new information. Offerors are deemed to have knowledge of all information that is posted to Contract Opportunities.

L.2 PROPOSAL PREPARATION:

L.2.1 The proposal must be prepared in a clear and legible manner. In addition, the Offeror shall write the proposal in English and the proposal must be specific and complete as described in these instructions. Offerors shall not specifically prepare samples or descriptive literature for submission with the proposal. Adherence to the prescribed format is required. Failure to provide proposals ______________________________ in compliance with the instructions specified as COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS in Section L of this RFP and in compliance with ALL_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ instructions in Section M.3 of this RFP shall render the Offeror's proposal non-compliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ not be further considered for award.____________________________________

L.2.2 All information pertaining to a particular volume shall be confined to that volume. For example, no Cost/Price information shall be included in any volume other than the Cost/Price Proposal volume. The Government is not required to and will not search other volumes for a missing file or missing information.

L.2.3 The proposal must not contain any classified material.

L.2.4 Offeror must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and have a Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) and

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code.

L.2.5 Digital Microsoft (MS) Word files and MS Excel files must be compatible with Microsoft Office 2013.

L.2.5.1 Please Note: The Offeror shall not lock or password protect any file (e.g. *.doc/.docx, *.pps/.pptx, *.xls/.xlsx, *.txt, *.msg).

L.2.6 Adobe PDF (Portable Document Format) Files. Scanned PDF documents must be legible and must be viewable in Adobe Acrobat.

L.2.6.1 Text Searchable Adobe PDFs: File formats that are identified as Text Searchable Adobe PDF must be formatted to contain searchable text. All elements of the file must be able to be searched for text. The Government will not accept scanned or image-only

PDF files in lieu of this requirement and will not invoke the text recognition feature within Adobe Acrobat.

6 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.2.7 Compressed files (e.g. *.zip) and Executable files (e.g. *bat, *.exe,*.jar, *.vb, *.wsf) will NOT be accepted. Refer to Attachment

0010 - Blocked File Extensions for a complete list of non-acceptable file types.

L.2.8 For the purposes of proposal preparation and evaluation only, the Offeror shall use 10 February 2022 as the Notice to Proceed

(NTP) date. Proposal information shall reflect that NTP date.

L.3 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS:

L.3.1 Proposals shall be submitted electronically to shaun.y.peterson.civ@mail.mil and james.w.doran10.civ@mail.mil. Due to file size restrictions, Proposals may be submitted through Department of Defense (DOD) Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE), http://safe.apps.mil/

. Non-CAC users will have to request a drop-off request from the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer. Please visit the website for more details and instructions for its use. Cloud Services and third party drop boxes are not acceptable for proposal submission.

Emailed proposals shall state the following in the subject line: Proposal for solicitation number (W52P1J-20-R-0063) - Add company name.

It is highly recommended that the Offeror request a Return Receipt or other form of acknowledgement to verify that the proposal submission was received prior to the closing of the RFP.

L.3.2 The proposal submittal method used for this solicitation is the electronic response via document upload method.

L.3.3 Offerors should enter a description for every file uploaded. For files over 10 megabytes (MB) the "Large Upload (JAVA)" button must be utilized. The combined file size limit for upload using "Large Upload (JAVA)" is 100MB. If needed, the Offeror can break single files over 100MB into smaller files or use the upload utility multiple times if files exceed the 100MB size limit.

L.3.4 Digital file names must use the required naming convention for each specific proposal document identified below. Filenames must be 40 characters or less and must not contain single quotes, spaces and pound or percent signs. If an Offeror's file name is too long

(more than 40 characters), it is permitted to abbreviate the Name of the Company field within the file name.

L.3.5 Proposal revisions are possible and permitted until the solicitation response deadline. Note: The Offeror must be logged in to the system to be able to submit / revise electronic responses.

L.3.6 Do not assume submission will be instantaneous. File size and number of files to be uploaded will be factors to consider.

Offeror/ Subcontractors should allow adequate time for submission completion because the entire proposal (i.e. Offerors submission and all Subcontractor(s) submissions) must be received by the due date and time for the proposal to be considered.

L.3.7 To avoid rejection of an offer, the Offeror must make every effort to ensure its electronic submission is virus-free. Proposals, or portions thereof, submitted with the presence of a virus or which are otherwise unreadable will be treated as unreadable pursuant to

FAR 15.207(c).

L.3.8 Submission Instructions for Subcontractor Cost proposal can be found in L.5.4.2.10.

L.4 PROPOSAL STRUCTURE:

L.4.1 The Offeror must submit a proposal IAW the guidelines below.

L.4.1.1 For all documents, each page shall include the complete Offeror's name, volume number, file name, date, and solicitation number in a header and/or footer.

L.4.1.2 Each Offeror shall submit ONLY one proposal and that proposal shall address all of the requirements of the RFP. To be considered for this requirement, the Offeror must submit a complete response to this RFP using the instructions provided in Section L.

COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: If the Offeror's proposal fails to meet the terms and conditions of the RFP or takes exception to any of the_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ terms and conditions of the RFP, will render the Offeror's proposal unacceptable and will not be further considered for award.______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

L.4.1.2 (a) Each Offeror shall submit the most current versions of Attachments 0002 - Staffing and Labor Mix, 0003 - Performance

Questionnaire, and 0005 - Cost-Price Matrix required for this RFP. The Government will verify that the Offerors submission contains the most current RFP Attachments 0002, 0003, and 0005 that were posted to Contract Opportunities as stated in Section A, Paragraph A.13.

L.4.1.2 (b) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: Failure to provide the most current versions of the RFP Attachments 0002, 0003, or 0005 shall render _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ the Offerors proposal non-compliant and will not be further considered for award._________________________________________________________________________________

L.4.1.3 A proposal is presumed to represent the Offerors best efforts to respond to the RFP. The Offeror must provide adequately detailed information that complies with the solicitation requirements, allows for meaningful review by the Government evaluators, and affirmatively demonstrates the merits of its proposal. The Offeror shall provide sufficient detail to substantiate the validity of all stated assertions and must not merely repeat the RFP requirements, but rather must provide convincing documentary evidence of how contract requirements will be met. Data not submitted with the proposal, but submitted previously, or presumed to be known (i.e., previous projects performed for the United States Government (USG)) will not be considered. Clarity and completeness are essential. It

7 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

is the Offerors obligation to submit an unambiguous proposal that clearly reflects the Offerors intended technical approach and establishes cost credibility. If the use of new and innovative techniques is intended, the impact on cost must be explained. As another example, if a business policy decision to absorb a portion of the estimated cost was made, that approach must be stated within the proposal (including any associated calculations). NOTE: Offerors must propose to the requirements of this Step 3 Task Order RFP.

Possessing a BOA does not guarantee that an Offeror will be determined technically acceptable for the purposes of this solicitation.

Therefore, Offerors must meet the requirements described in this solicitation in order to be eligible for award.

L.5 INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED:

L.5.1 General Documents: The Offeror shall include the following:

L.5.1.1 One executed signed copy of the RFP coversheet titled "Solicitation, Offer and Award" (SF33).

L.5.1.1(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_SF33

L.5.1.1(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.1(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.1(d) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: Failure to provide the signed SF 33 will render the Offeror's proposal non-compliant. The proposal _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for award.___________________________________________________________________

L.5.1.2 EITHER all signed amendment coversheets titled "Amendment of Solicitation/ Modification of Contract" (SF30) or one executed signed copy of the RFP coversheet (SF 33) with block fourteen (14) completed.

L.5.1.2(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_SF30(Amends)

L.5.1.2(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.2(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.3 Section I clauses that require Offeror completion.

L.5.1.3(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_Iclauses

L.5.1.3(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.3(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.4 Section K clauses that require Offeror certification.

L.5.1.4(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_Kclauses

L.5.1.4(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.4(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.5 Offeror Points of Contact (POC): The Government does not intend to conduct discussions prior to awarding this task order.

However, any exchanges to include clarifications between the Government and the Offeror will be conducted through the use of e-mail.

Therefore, the Offeror is required to provide at least two (2) company individuals whose responsibilities will include reading and responding to Evaluation Notices (ENs) through e-mail. For example, the Offeror's Contract Manager, as an agent of the company might be the main agent responsible, but a second agent shall be available in case of the main agent's unavailability. The agents' names, company titles, telephone numbers, facsimile numbers, and e-mail addresses should be provided, and it is the Offeror's responsibility to keep the information updated throughout the competition; submission of updated POC information will not constitute a proposal revision. A

Title Page is allowable to provide for the restriction or disclosure and use of data as specified in FAR Clause 52.215-1.

L.5.1.5(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_POCs

L.5.1.5(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.5(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.6 Business Systems Information:

L.5.1.6.1 The Contracting Officer will review the Offeror's accounting system status for determining contractor responsibility IAW FAR

8 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

16.301-3; a cost-reimbursement type contract may be used only when the contractor's accounting system is adequate for determining costs applicable to the contract. An adequate system is a system that can separately accumulate costs under a Government contract and has the ability to generate the specific cost information required under the anticipated contract. An SF 1408 has been attached to this RFP

(Attachment 0006) which contains the specific procedures that are considered part of an adequate system. Therefore, in order for an

Offeror to receive an award under this RFP, the successful Offeror will be required to demonstrate that the design of its accounting system can accomplish the specific SF 1408 procedures; as a result, the Offeror is required to provide in its proposal:

- Official documentation, from either a successful Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audit of the Offeror's accounting system; or

- A letter from the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) documenting its approval/adequacy of the Offeror's accounting system; or

- Rationale for why documentation cannot be presented at proposal submission and a proposed date for which required documentation will be available. Absent an adequate accounting system, an apparent awardee cannot be determined responsible under FAR 9.104-5 and will be ineligible for award. Per FAR 9.104-5(b), an apparent awardee who does not furnish the certification or such information as may be requested by the Contracting Officer shall be given an opportunity to remedy the deficiency. Therefore, if an Offeror is unable to provide the certification with its proposal as required, it will be given another opportunity to present the required certification prior to award in the event it is determined to be the apparent awardee.

L.5.1.6.1 (a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_AcctSys

L.5.1.6.1 (b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.6.1 (c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.6.2 The Offeror shall provide its current Government approval status of the following business systems: billing (internal controls), estimating, budget and financial control, purchasing and quality assurance. The Offeror shall provide official Government approval documentation for any systems that have Government approval. The approval status and approval documentation will not be evaluated and is for Government contract administration. If approval of any of these business systems is not available, provide a statement of such and a brief rationale as to why these systems have not been approved.

L.5.1.6.2 (a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_BusSys

L.5.1.6.2 (b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.6.2 (c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.7 Teaming Matrix (Attachment 0005, Tab 2): The Offeror shall provide the full company name, CAGE code, role of participant, functional area(s) to be performed, proposed labor/fee for each participant for the entire period of performance (excluding ODC's and the option to extend), percent of participation, and cost proposal submittal method, indicate whether the participant requires a SECRET

Facility Clearance, and indicate which participants will perform in the ASP. The Offeror shall populate every column using the instructed fill-ins on the Attachment 0005, Tab 2 for itself, and proposed Subcontractors.

L.5.1.7 (a) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: The amount in the total of Column F (Total estimated dollar value) provided on Attachment 0005, Tab ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 shall match the amount of 'Subtotal - Proposed Labor/Fee" found on Attachment 0005, Tab 1a, Cell I22'. Failure to make these two____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ amounts match shall render the Offeror's proposal non-compliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be further considered_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ for award.__________

L.5.1.7 (b) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_4_Att0005

L.5.1.7 (c) File Format: MS Excel

L.5.1.7 (d) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.7 (e) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: If an Offeror is proposing subcontractors, failure of the Offeror to populate all blue highlighted ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ cells for itself and each of its proposed Subcontractor(s) on the Teaming Matrix (Attachment 0005, Tab 2) will render the Offeror's____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ proposal non-compliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for award._________________________________________________________________________________________________________

L.5.1.7 (f) The compliance requirements of L.5.1.7(a) and (e) do not apply to an Offeror performing 100% of the requirement by itself with no subcontractors.

L.5.1.8 SECRET Facility Clearance: Offerors must possess a SECRET Facility Clearance by the RFP closing date, at the time of award, and throughout the life of the contract. Any and all Subcontractors who will be performing contract requirements which necessitate facility clearance must also have a SECRET Facility Clearance by RFP closing date, at the time of award, and throughout the life of the contract.

In order for an Offeror/Subcontractor to request and sponsor an individual employee's SECRET Security Clearance to perform the functions identified in the PWS, the Offeror/ Subcontractor must possess a SECRET Facility Clearance by the RFP closing date. Possession

9 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

of an INTERIM SECRET Facility Clearance will be sufficient to meet the requirement at time of proposal submission provided that it can be validated by the Defense Security Service (DSS); however, please note that access to classified COMSEC information requires a FINAL

US Government Clearance at the appropriate level and therefore if contractor employee requires access to classified COMSEC the offeror will be required to possess a FINAL US Government Clearance at the appropriate level in order to perform after award, and throughout the life of the contract.

While it is acknowledged that the Offeror may form contractual relationships with additional legal entities (i.e. Prime/Subcontracts, Partnerships, etc.) in order to perform work under this contract, including the specific work which necessitates the SECRET Facility and

Security Clearances, the Offeror (i.e. the legal entity that is submitting the proposal and would be identified as the awardee of the contract) must possess a SECRET Facility Clearance itself and cannot rely solely on the clearance of a Subcontractor or other legal entity. Possession of a SECRET Facility Clearance will be determined by CAGE code. For a proposal submitted by a Joint Venture, the

SECRET Facility Clearance must be granted under the name and CAGE code of the Joint Venture itself to meet this solicitation requirement; even if the managing partner of the Joint Venture has a SECRET Facility Clearance, or if all members of the Joint Venture have a SECRET Facility Clearance, the proposal will not be eligible for award unless the Joint Venture possesses the clearance under its own name and CAGE code.

L.5.1.8 (a) The Offeror shall complete Column I on Tab 2 of Attachment 0005 (Teaming Matrix) for any and all listed entities (i.e.

Offeror and Subcontractors, Subsidiaries, or other affiliates) that require a SECRET Facility Clearance for their proposed performance of requirements IAW the PWS. The Contracting Officer will verify that all entities designated as YES possess a SECRET Facility

Clearance; the verification will be conducted through a CAGE code search performed on the Defense Security Services (DSS) Industrial

Security Facilities Database (ISFD).

L.5.1.9 Pre-Award Safety Responsibility

L.5.1.9.1 Offers shall demonstrate capability to comply with the contract safety requirements IAW DFARS Clause 252.223-7002 - Safety

Precautions for Ammunition and Explosives, Clause 252.223-7003 - Change in Place of Performance Ammunition and Explosives and paragraph

5.22 of the PWS to be part of a responsibility determination. The following shall be submitted with the proposal:

L.5.1.9.1 (a) A safety plan outlining the Offeror's approach to ensure compliance with each of the General Safety Requirements described in Chapter 3 of the DoD Contractor's Safety Manual For Ammunition and Explosives (4145.26-M) dated 13 March 2008. The Offeror may provide evidence of the development and implementation of a safety program used during the performance of Ammunition Supply Services under another Government contract which includes operational procedures intended to prevent ammunition and explosive related accidents.

However, the Offeror's safety plan shall still address each of the General Safety Requirements described in Chapter 3 of the DoD 4145.26-

M. If an Offeror does not have an existing safety plan, it may submit a draft safety plan addressing each of the General Safety

Requirements described in Chapter 3 of the DoD 4145.26-M.

L.5.1.9.1 (b) A history of accident experience that meets the reporting requirements at DoD 4145.26-M C2.2 Reporting Criteria for any

Federal, State or Local Government contracts for any type of ammunition or explosive related services with performance within three (3) years of the closing date of this RFP. If the Offeror has no history of accidents that meets the reporting requirements at DoD 4145.26-M

C2.2, then the Offeror shall submit, with its proposal, a statement indicating it has no accident experience that meets the reporting requirements at DoD 4145.26-M C2.2.

L.5.1.9.1 (c) Subcontractor information:

L.5.1.9.1 (c)(1) Identification of all subcontractors proposed for the ammunition supply services.

L.5.1.9.1 (c)(2) Proposed methods used to evaluate the capability of the subcontractor to comply with the requirements of DoD 4145.26-M.

L.5.1.9.1 (c)(3) Propose methods used to ensure subcontractor compliance.

L.5.1.9.1(d) Naming Convention: Offerors_Name_Vol_1_Safety

L.5.1.9.1(e) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.9.1(f) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.10 Mission Essential Contractor Services (MECS)

L.5.1.10.1 The Offeror's MECS proposal shall adhere to the following:

L.5.1.10.1(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_MECS

L.5.1.10.1(b) File Format: Text Searchable Adobe PDF

L.5.1.10.1(c) Page Limit: 2 pages

10 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.5.1.10.1 (c)(1) Page limit excludes cover page, table of contents, and glossary of abbreviations and acronyms.

L.5.1.10.1 (c)(2) Pages larger than 8.5 inches x 11 inches will be counted as two pages.

L.5.1.10.1 (c)(3) The font size shall be no less than 10 point font for all documents, to include charts, tables, and diagrams.

L.5.1.10.2 Mission Essential Contractor Services (MECS): The Offeror shall provide its MECS Plan that details its approach as to how it will continue to perform the essential contractor services listed in Attachment 0013 - Mission Essential Contractor Services by specifically addressing each part of the DFARS 252.237-7024 (b)(2)(i through v) .

L.5.1.11 Offerors shall submit its Small Business Administration 8(a) Certification Letter as proof of being an 8(a) contractor.

L.5.1.11(a) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_1_8(a)cert.

L.5.1.11(b) File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

L.5.1.11(c) Page Limit: None

L.5.1.11(d) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: Failure to provide the Small Business Administration 8(a) Certification Letter shall render the ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Offeror's proposal non-compliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for award.___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

L.5.2 Technical Management Factor:

L.5.2.1 The Offeror shall demonstrate mission capability by detailing its proposed technical approach to meet the requirements specified in the PWS and this RFP by providing its Staffing and Management Plan (SMP).

L.5.2.1.1 Staffing and Management Plan (SMP):

L.5.2.1.1(a) The Offeror's SMP proposal must adhere to the following:

L.5.2.1.1(a)(1) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_2_SMP

L.5.2.1.1(a)(2) File Format: Text Searchable Adobe PDF

L.5.2.1.1(a)(3) Page Limit: 15 Pages

L.5.2.1.1(a)(3)(i) Page limit excludes cover page, table of contents, and glossary of abbreviations and acronyms

L.5.2.1.1(a)(3)(ii) Pages larger than 8.5 inches x 11 inches will be counted as two pages

L.5.2.1.1(a)(3)(iii) The font size must be no less than 10 point font for all documents, to include charts, tables, and diagrams.

L.5.2.1.1(a)(4) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: Failure to provide the Staffing and Management Plan and in compliance with L.5.2.1.1(a)(3) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ through L.5.2.1.1(a)(3)(ii) will render the Offeror's proposal non-compliant. The proposal will not be evaluated and will not be__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ further considered for award._____________________________

L.5.2.1.1(b) The Offeror's Staffing and Management Plan must detail the Offerors approach, to include a visual representation (i.e.

organizational diagram), to deliver services required in the RFP and PWS. The Offerors SMP must detail the overarching methodology used to determine the proposed skill sets / skill level; the SMP must also contain any rational used to support staffing decisions with any explanations needed to clarify staffing decisions Additionally, the SMP shall detail its approach to creating its management structure from general staff oversight by first line supervisors through its company headquarters management. This approach shall detail the management and supervision structure related to executing this effort. As the Government will utilize the Service Contract Act (SCA)

Directory of Occupations (5th Edition) and Attachment 0025 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List for technical evaluation purposes, the

Offeror shall utilize those sources whenever possible to determine which labor categories/position titles to propose as part of its proposed staffing.

The SMP MUST BE SUPPORTED BY THE OFFEROR'S ATTACHMENT 0002 STAFFING/LABOR MIX and, at a minimum, must address the following elements:

L.5.2.1.1(b)(1) Reserved

L.5.2.1.1(b)(1)(i) Reserved

L.5.2.1.1(b)(1)(ii) The Offeror's SMP must include a description of its capability to successfully execute the provided surge requirement capability in accordance with PWS 1.4.3.1 and TD-12 Mobilization Support Services. The Offeror shall provide a plan detailing how it will successfully meet the surge requirement by achieving full operational capability (FOC) not later than 21 days

11 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

following the NTP from the PCO. The Offeror's detailed description must include the individual(s) (identified by position title) responsible to receive and immediately respond to the NTP, its methodology and plan to increase staffing not later than 21 days, and the hiring practices proposed. Consideration should be given to the temporary nature and limited duration of the work, and the effect on recruitment and retention. NOTE: Offeror's are NOT to price the Mobilization Support Services, as the Mobilization Support Services portion will not be evaluated for cost/price. An award under this RFP does not guarantee the contractor the award of this Mobilization

Support Services, nor does it obligate the Government to additional costs or fee associated with the Mobilization Support Services.

L.5.2.1.1(b)(2) The Offeror must provide an Organizational Diagram to depict a comprehensive organizational overview that identifies the following:

L.5.2.1.1(b)(2)(i) Identification of the tasks to be performed by the Offeror and all proposed subcontractor(s) (if applicable) as identified on the Offerors Teaming Matrix (Attachment 0005, Tab 2).

L.5.2.1.1(b)(2)(ii) Identification of the command and control relationship among the Offeror, all proposed subcontractor(s) as identified on the Offerors Teaming Matrix (Attachment 0005, Tab 2). The command and control relationship must include identification of leadership positions (e.g., team leads, foremen, supervisors, deputies, managers) responsible for performing successful oversight of each of the primary task areas identified in Section C-5 of the PWS. FTE Counts are not required on the Organizational Diagram.

Proposed FTEs counts will only be evaluated on the Attachment 0002 and will not be evaluated as part of the Organizational Diagram.

L.5.2.1.1(b)(2)(iii)\~The Offeror must clearly identify its onsite quality control approach with direct coordination to the responsible corporate quality office

L.5.2.1.1(c) Staffing/Labor Mix (Attachment 0002 - Staffing/Labor Mix): Staffing/Labor Mix (Attachment 0002 - Staffing/Labor Mix): The

Offeror must provide its proposed staffing mix/labor categories (skill sets / skill level, number of employees) in relation to the PWS requirements and Attachment 0025 TD-02 Workload Data and Density List. (see applicable Technical Data) for both the base period and option periods (fully operational capable 12-month periods (365 day periods)). The Offeror's proposal must present a staffing approach which demonstrates a thorough understanding of the effort and provides the expected skill sets / skill level of each position, to include level of responsibility in order to successfully perform the specific workload requirements identified in Attachment 0025 TD-02

Workload Data and Density List and meet all of the PWS requirements. The TD-01 Historical Workload is provided only as a reference point to show how similar workload/requirements have historically been accomplished. This TD-01 Historical Workload is not a guarantee of future workload.

NOTE: For Technical evaluation purposes only, the Government will utilize the Service Contract Act (SCA) Directory of Occupations (5th

Edition) to determine if the proposed labor category has the skill set / skill level necessary to perform the required task(s) as identified in L.5.2.1.1(b).

It is further noted that the inclusion of only some of the PWS paragraphs in Attachment 0025 (TD-02 Workload Data and Density List) was for Technical evaluation purposes only. During contract execution, compliance with all PWS requirements is expected and required.

L.5.2.1.1(c)(1) Offeror's proposal shall adhere to the following:

L.5.2.1.1(c)(2) Naming Convention: Offeror's_Name_Vol_2_Att0002

L.5.2.1.1(c)(3) File Format: MS Excel

L.5.2.1.1(c)(3)(i) The Offeror shall not add or remove any tabs (other than the example tab) to the Attachment 0002 Staffing/Labor Mix.

L.5.2.1.1(c)(4) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT: Failure to provide the Staffing/Labor Mix Attachment 0002 in the Government provided format, in _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ compliance with L.5.2.1.1(c)(3) and L.5.2.1.1(c)(3)(i), and to provide the following required information, shall render the Offeror's______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ proposal non-compliant, and the proposal will not be…