RFP Questions and Answers.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J19R0118
View the file
Other files
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question # | Question Reference (RFP #, PWS #, etc.) | Question | Answer | |
| 1 | Exhibit A, TD-01 Workload & PWS | Exhibit A TD-01 Workload spreadsheet excludes the Container Yard Operations task within the Transportation tab; however, the PWS includes this task (5.33). Would the Government clarify whether Container Yard Operations is a required task for this effort? | Container Yard Operations PWS 5.33 is included on the Transportation tab under column B in the first merged section. Depending on how TD-01 Workload opens up, Offeror may have to adjust the row height of the document to see all language. | |
| 2 | Key Personnel | Is the ASP Supervisor/Lead at JBLE FLC2 and Ft Lee FLC1? | TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key has been updated. Ft Lee requires a FLC1 Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Lead/ Inspector, and JBLE requires a FLC2 Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Supervisor | |
| 3 | CLIN Breakout | Is CLIN 0002AA JBLE and CLIN 0002BA Fort Story? | No, CLIN 0003AA is JBLE and Ft Story PASSBACK. CLIN 0003AB is JBLE and Ft Story BASEOPS. | |
| 4 | Key Personnel | Is there a requirement for Key or Non-Key personnel solely dedicated to Ft Story? | No, Any Key and Specified Non-Key personnel skill sets needed at Fort Story will be shared by JBLE. | |
| 5 | TD-01 and Attachment 0002 | TD-01 shows CLIN 2CA belonging to Ft Lee. Attachment 2 – S&L Mix shows CLIN 2CA belonging to JBLE. Attachment 5 – Cost Price Matrix shows CLIN 2CA belonging to JBLE. Can you verify that the TD-01 labor hours need to be assigned to JBLE? | TD-01 Workload has been updated. CLIN 3CA is now aligned under JBLE. Maintenance CLINs are now 3 series CLINs. | |
| 6 | CLIN Breakout | Can you clarify the CLIN(s) that designated as JBLE, which are for Ft Eustis and which are for Ft Story? | CLINs designated as JBLE are for both JBLE and Ft Story. | |
| 7 | TD-01, Maintenance Tab, Row 6, Task Column | The Task description matches the SCA Automotive Worker job description but there is no equivalent job category in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 0008 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk. | TD-01 Workload has been updated with correct task descriptions that now align to the crosswalk. | |
| 8 | TD-01, Maintenance Tab, Row 20, Task Column | The Task description matches the SCA Fabric Worker job description except for the last sentence which suggests a different labor category is desired but there is no equivalent job in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 0008 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement, if it is desired what repairs this employee will perform and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk. | TD-01 Workload has been updated with correct task descriptions. Hours associated with maintenance repair tasks have been realigned from the fabric task description to the correct maintenance task description. | |
| 9 | TD-01, Maintenance Tab, Row 32, Task Column | The Task description matches the SCA Personnel Assistant (Employment) II job description but there is no equivalent job category in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 0008 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk. | Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. | |
| 10 | TD-01, Supply Tab, Row 8, Task Column | The Task description is close to matching the SCA Material Handling Laborer job description but there is no equivalent job category in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 08 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk. | TD-01 Workload has been updated with correct task descriptions. Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. | |
| 11 | TD-01, Transportation Tab, Rows 3 and 4, Task Column | The Task description is close to matching the SCA Material Expeditor job description but there is no equivalent job category in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 0008 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk. | TD-01 Workload has been updated with correct task descriptions. Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. | |
| 12 | TD-01, Transportation Tab, Row 11, Task Column | The Task description is a fraction of the SCA Dispatcher Motor Vehicle job description found in TD-01, Transportation Tab, Row 9. Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement. | The task description is correct. | |
| 13 | TD-01 | |||
| Attachment 0005 | TD-01 lists CLIN 0002CA as work at Fort Lee, VA, while Attachment 0005 lists CLIN 0002CA as work at JBLE. Will the Government please clarify this requirement? | TD-01 Workload has been updated. CLIN 0003CA is now aligned under JBLE. Maintenance CLINs are now 3 series CLINs. | ||
| 14 | TD-01 | |||
| Attachment 0005 | TD-01 lists CLINs 0002LA, MA, and NA; however there are no such CLINs listed in Attachment 0005. Will the Government please clarify the requirement? | TD-01 Workload has been updated. CLINs 0002LA, 0002MA, and 0002NA have been deleted. Hours associated with these CLINs have been reallocated to other CLINs. | ||
| 15 | TD-01; Supply ASP | TD-01 requires an ASP Supply Support Administrative task that the TD-01 also specifies receives 4% HAZ uplift. This administrative position, as the task details, is an office support and does not handle hazardous materials Will the Government please clarify if this position requirement also handles hazardous materials or if the 4% HAZ uplift is justified/required? | Yes, this position should be proposed with 4% uplift due to the low hazard working environment and the location of the tasks being performed. | |
| 16 | TD-01; Supply ASP | |||
| TD-06 | There is a TD-01 ASP staffing requirement at Fort Lee; however, there is no ASP Supervisor required in TD-06. Is this the Government's intent that the technically acceptable for there to be no dedicated FTE ASP Supervisor at Fort Lee? | The government has not identified a requirement for a dedicated FTE ASP supervisor at Fort Lee. However, TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key has been updated by identifing supervisory duties for the ASP under the Supply Operations Manager at Fort Lee. | ||
| 17 | TD-06, Page 9, Electronics Technician Maintenance– Specified Non-Key Position | The associated job description matches the SCA job description for an Electronics Technician Maintenance III and Attachment 0002, row 41, equates this job to a Electronics Technician Maintenance I. Please clarify the job description or categorization. | Attachment 0002 has been updated to Electronics Technician Maintenance III. | |
| 18 | TD-06, Page 6, Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Lead/ Inspector -Key Position | Attachment 0002, Row 33, equates this job category to an Ammunition Supply Point Specialist. Attachment 008 and Attachment 0016 do not have an equivalent position listed and Attachment 0002, Row 38 equates an Ammunition Specialist to an ASP Operations Specialist. Please clarify what job category the Ammunition Supply Point Specialist fits in to. | Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note: Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. | |
| 19 | Attachment 0001, Page 42, Paragraph 5.4.5 | Carpentry tasks are called out in this paragraph but no corresponding work load is in TD-01. Please clarify the requirement and/or work load required. | TD-01 Workload does not list every single detail/task required in PWS Section 5. TD-01 provides the Minimum Functional Labor Category 1 Hours required to perform all PWS Section 5 paragraphs. During contract execution, the preponderance of FLC1 hours proposed will support the respective task/descriptions associated with the identified PWS paragraph number identified in TD-01. During contract execution, it is expected offerors will cross utilize labor categories to support ancillary tasks required by the PWS (e.g. mechanic performing carpentry tasks). | |
| 20 | Attachment 0001, Page 56, Paragraph 5.33 | Container Yard Operations tasks are called out in this paragraph but no corresponding work load is in TD-01. Please clarify the requirement and/or work load required. | Container Yard Operations PWS 5.33 is included on the Transportation tab under column B in the first merged section. Depending on how TD-01 Workload opens up, Offeror may have to adjust the row height of the document to see all language. | |
| 21 | Attachment 0016 | As there is no associated job description, will the government clarify if the Order Filler II found in Attachment 0008, page 32 of 71, should be added to the Cross Walk as an Order Filler SCA code 21071? | The Order Filler II position title has been added to the CBA-SCA crosswalk. | |
| 22 | Attachment 0016 | As there is no associated job description, will the government clarify how the Property Technician (Supply) found in Attachment 0008, page 33 of 71, should be added to the Cross Walk? | The Property Technician (Supply) position title has been added to the CBA-SCA crosswalk. | |
| 23 | Attachment 0016 | As there is no associated job description, will the government clarify how the Warehouse Specialist - Stock Readiness found in Attachment 0008, page 31 of 71, should be added to the Cross Walk? | The Warehouse Specialist - Stock Readiness position title has been added to the CBA-SCA crosswalk. | |
| 24 | Attachment 0016 | There are two (2) crosswalks include in Attachment 0016: one (1) for Fort Lee and the other labeled, "Fort Eustis." Does the Fort Eustis crosswalk also apply and include all labor categories for Langley and Fort Story, or if not, will the Government be providing those crosswalks? | Yes, the crosswalk titled Fort Eustis includes Joint Base Langley Eustis (JBLE) and Fort Story. | |
| 25 | Attachment 0016 | On the Fort Lee crosswalk, will the Government please clarify what the difference is in labor categories: Production Control Clerk I and Production Control Clerk II so that offerors other than the incumbent can properly determine appropriate and technically acceptable staffing for these positions? | TD-01 Workload has been updated to delineate the appropriate tasks for both the Production Control I and Production Control II requirements. | |
| 26 | Questions & Answers #59 and #78 |
TD-01
TD-06
| Attachment 0008 | The Government's answers points to an ES&H Clerk at JBLE; however the TD-06 specifies this position is only at Fort Lee. The similar requirements in the TD-01 are both for Fort Lee and the FLC-1 CBA position is only included in the Fort Lee CBA and absent from the JBLE CBA. Will the Government please refresh and clarify the requirements for both the Safety Coordinator and ES&H Clerk positions at Fort Lee and JBLE? | Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note: Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. |
| 27 | TD-06 | |
| Attachment 0002 | The JBLE Electronics Technician Maintenance, Lead is listed as a Specified Non-Key position in both the TD-06 and Attachment 0002; however, the JBLE Electronics Technician Maintenance (non-lead) position is listed in the TD-01 with the same Electronics Technician Maintenance III skills, but listed as the Electronics Technician Maintenance I in the Attachment 0002. Will the Government please clarify the requirement as there is no TD-06 requirement for an Electronics Technician Maintenance I at JBLE, but it is listed in the Attachment 0002 (duty title)? | Attachment 0002 has been updated from Electronics Technician Maintenance I to an Electronics Technician Maintenance III. |
| 28 | TD-01 |
Attachment 0008
| Attachment 0016 | In the Maintenance Production Control task area there is an Administrative JBLE requirement very clearly specifying an Human Resources (HR)-related labor category not in Attachment 0008 or Attachment 0016, nor anything closely related to it. Will the Government please clarify this task description to more accurately depict this Production Control administrative requirement? | The task description is correct. Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. |
| 29 | TD-01 |
TD-06
Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008
| Attachment 0016 | TD-01 requires one (1) full-time equivalent (FTE) Environmental Safety & Health (ES&H) Clerk at Fort Lee in each Maintenance Production Control as well as in Supply HAZ and Fuel. This is a TD-06 Program Management Office (PMO) Specified Non-Key position listed as FLC-1 in TD-06, and listed as a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) position in both the Attachment 0002 and Attachment 0008 at Fort Lee only. In the Attachment 0002, however, it is only specified as one (1) FTE in the PMO. Will the Government please clarify this requirement in both locations, CLIN (PMO or respectively 0002DA and 0003GA), and quantities? | Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note: Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. |
| 30 | TD-01 |
TD-06
Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008
| Attachment 0016 | The TD-06 Supply ASP requirement lists a Lead position at Fort Lee and not JBLE; however, the TD-01 ASP Lead is listed under JBLE and not Fort Lee. There are many other inconsistencies as well with the ASP requirement that do not synch between the TD-01, TD-06, Attachment 0002, Attachment 0008, and Attachment 0016. Will the Government please clarify the ASP requirements at both Fort Lee and JBLE so they are consistent with all referenced documents? | Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note: Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. |
| 31 | TD-01, Transportation Material Support (the first two (2) line item tasks) |
TD-06
Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008
| Attachment 0016 | The first task is a mix of some sort of lead/trainer in safety with Material Coordinator tasks mixed in. The second task is spot on Material Coordinator. There is no Material Coordinator, nor any like labor category in the TD-06, Attachment 0002, Attachment 0008, or Attachment 0016. | TD-01 Workload under Transportation Material Support (the first two (2) line item tasks) are written correctly and align to the Att0016 crosswalk. | ||
| 32 | The only safety-related FLC-1/CBA position in any of these documents is the PMO ES&H Clerk, which is Specified Non-Key and only one (1) FTE on the Attachment 0002. This level of specificity with the safety requirement tasks, along with requiring a labor category that doesn't exist in the CBA has made staffing these two (2) requirements impossible. Will the Government please clarify these requirements in a way that aligns with Attachments 0002, 0008, 0016, and TD-06? | Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note: Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. | ||
| 33 | TD-01 |
TD-06
Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008
| Attachment 0016 | The Government has listed a requirement in both Maintenance and Supply (TD-06) for "Supply Support - Environmental Safety & Health" each at Fort Lee. This position is listed in the PMO at FLC-1/CBA as Specified Non-Key; however, the Attachment 0002 only lists one (1) FTE in the PMO. Will the Government please clarify this requirement in Maintenance and Supply or are these positions the same, just not Specified Non-Key in Maintenance and Supply? | Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note: Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. |
| 34 | TD-01 |
TD-06
Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008
| Attachment 0016 | The Government has listed a requirement in both Maintenance and Supply (TD-06) for "Supply/Support - Environmental Safety & Health" each at Fort Lee. This position is listed in the PMO at FLC-1/CBA as Specified Non-Key; however, the Attachment 0002 only lists one (1) FTE in the PMO. Since the PMO position is allocated under the PMO on Attachment 0002, are these PMO FLC-1 hours to be allocated against what functional area or none at all? | Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note: Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. |
| 35 | TD-01 |
TD-06
Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008
| Attachment 0016 | Are there any non-CBA and strictly SCA labor category positions on the current contract? | Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. |
| 36 | TD-01 |
TD-06
Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008
| Attachment 0016 | Will the Government acknowledge that if there are any non-CBA and strictly SCA labor category positions on the current contract, and by disclosing them, they would negate any unfair technical, as well as pricing advantage (SCA is lower than CBA) provided to the incumbent who would be the only company with such knowledge? | There are no SCA positions on the current contract. | ||
| 37 | Attachment 0005, Allocation_Tab_1b | Row 321, Columns D through H, for entering the values for CLIN 0005 are blacked out. Should the contractor use Row 320 to enter these values? | No | |
| 38 | BO8 exhibit B CDRL Listing | The Government only provide a listing of the CDRLs and not the document itself. Will the Govt provide each of the documents similarly to other TOR issued? | The CDRL Portfolio contains one DD1423-1 to cover the CDRL requirements. Details of each CDRL are now included within the Attachment 0001 PWS. The CDRL portfolio also contains all government provided CDRL formats. | |
| 39 | TD-06 Key & Specified Non-Key Positions Fort Lee/JBLE Fort Story, VA | TD-06 JBLE/Fort Story lists Locksmith - Specified Non-Key Position and Supply Techncian ASP - Specified Non-Key Position. The TD does not idicate if these are proposed as either FLC1 or FLC2 positions. Please clarify how these postions are classified. | TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions has been updated. Locksmith is 100% FLC1. Supply Technician ASP has been removed. | |
| 40 | Attchment 0016 CBA To SCA Crosswalk, Ft. Lee TAB. | The Fort Lee CBA has three labor categories, Order Filler II, Warehouse Specialist - Stock Readiness, and Property Technician (Supply), that were added by memorandums of understanding that were not included in Attachment 0016. Please update Attachment 0016 to reflect these added positions. | These labor categories have been added to Attachment 0016. | |
| 41 | PWS Annex B Supply PRS | The Supply PRS listed Task Requirement 5.16.1, PWS 5.16 is Reserved. Why does Annex B list a Task/Requirement that is Reserved? | Annex B has been updated to reserve 5.16. | |
| 42 | TD-01 Workload Maintenance TAB. | In the TD-01 Maintenance worksheet the PWS Requirement / Shop column lists Supporting Functions and Tasks with no PWS reference assigned, please address where the Supporting Functions and Task requirements align with the PWS requirements provided. | "Supporting Functions and Task" description has been removed from the PWS Requirement / Shop column. | |
| 43 | PWS 1.4.6.1 and 1.4.6.2 | PWS 1.4.6.1 and PWS 1.4.6.2 reference compliance with Executive Order (EO) 13495, that EO was revoked on 31 October 2019, is the PWS reference still applicable? | Even though there is an Executive Order and the Department of Labor has taken some action, theFederal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Clause 52.222-17 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers remains in full force until such time as there is a change to the FAR (e.g a deviation) |
| 44 | Solicitation, p. 50, L.5.2.1.1(a)(3) | The SMP currently has a 10 page limitation. In order to stay compliant and cover two installations, the org chart will not fit in one 11x17. Please consider adding two pages to the limitation for the org chart, or consider it out of page count. | The 10 page limitation will remain. 9 pages has been used before and there were no issues. |
| 45 | RFP Section J | Will the Govt provide missing documents Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Att 0008, Att 0012, and Att 0016 via SAMS BETA or email? | These exhibits and attachments were provided via DoD Safe. Updated documents for Amendment 0005 will also be provided in DoD Safe |
| 46 | Questions and Answers #85 | RFP requests documentation for only the Accouning System, but not the Business Systems. Answer to question indicates Business Systems has been add at para L.5.1.6.2. There is no para L.5.1.6.2 in the RFP. Will the Govt provide an updated RFP? | Amendment 0005 adds Section L, Paragarph L.5.1.6.2. |
| 47 | Attachment 0015 Subcontractor Cost Info Submission | Instructions states in part, "…to the Government via FBO shall…" Since FBO is not a viable submission option, how does the Gov't want Subcontractor Cost Info submitted? | Reference Section L, Paragraph L.3 Proposal Submittal Instructions. Offerors may email proposals or submit proposals through Department of Defense DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) |
| 48 | Proposal Due Date | Will the Gov't extend proposal submission due date - specifically give offerors a due date 30 days from date all missing documents received? | Amendment 0005 will extend the due date |
| 49 | Attachment 0005, Cost/Price Matrix, Allocation_Tab_1b | CLIN 0005 on Allocation_Tab_1b is greyed out so Offerors cannot provide a price for these CLINs. Would the Government provide a corrected copy of Attachment 0005 to include fields in blue for Offerors to complete CLIN 0005? | Attachment 0005 has been updated. |
| 50 | Attachment 0007, DOL Wage Determination | The Government provided WDs number 2015-4314, revision number 11 dated 07/16/2019, and number 2015-4341, revision number 11 dated 12/26/2018, as part of the solicitation. A more recent version of these WDs exist, revision number 13 dated 12/23/2019 and revision number 13 dated 12/23/2019, respectively. The updated WDs include the calendar year 2020 hourly minimum wage under Executive Order 13658 and for WD 2015-4341, the updated health & welfare rates as well. Would the Government please confirm that: 1) the Government intended to provide one WD ending in an even number and one WD ending in an odd number and 2) Offerors are to use the provided prior revision number WDs for pricing purposes and not the current revision number WDs? | The Government intends to use Wage Determination 2015-4313, Revision 12, dated 23 December 2019 for Fort Lee and 2015-4341, Revision 13, dated 23 December 2019 for JBLE. Attachment 0007 has been updated to reflect these changes and offerors are to use these updated versions. |
| 51 | RFP, Page 2, A.2 and All Questions and Amswers Final | The RFP states "Please note that the Government answers provided in response to the feedback received on the DRAFT documents are not incorporated into this RFP." Will the Government verify that the answers to the questions have not incorporated and that these will be addressed in an ammendment? | The Government does not incorporate questions and answers into the RFP |
| 52 | Solicitation page 61, paragraph L.5.4.2.12(a)(2) & Attachment 0008 Fort Lee CBA page 24 | Solicitation page 61, paragraph L.5.4.2.12(a)(2) states that the CBA for Fort Lee expires on 31 March 2020 and Offerors will continue to use the last applicable rate(s) in force (without escalation) for the remainder of the period of performance. However, the CBA for Fort Lee contains a set of labor rates that become effective October 2020. Should offerors use the October 2019 rates or the October 2020 rates for all periods? | In accordance with the CBA, written notice to terminate the agreement must be provided to the Government sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date of 31 Mar 2020. If this notice is not received, the CBA automatically renews itself for one (1) year periods. No such notice has been received and therefore the agreement will be extended for another year. With this extension, the October 2020 rates should be used. |
| 53 | |||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | |||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | |||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | |||
| 62 | |||
| 63 | |||
| 64 | |||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | |||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | |||
| 71 | |||
| 72 | |||
| 73 | |||
| 74 | |||
| 75 | |||
| 76 | |||
| 77 | |||
| 78 | |||
| 79 | |||
| 80 | |||
| 81 | |||
| 82 | |||
| 83 | |||
| 84 | |||
| 85 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .