Final RFP Questions and Answers - Amendment 0010.pdf

Question # Question Reference (RFP #, PWS

#, etc.)

Question Original Answer Revised Answer (if needed)

Exhibit A, TD-01 Workload & PWS Exhibit A TD-01 Workload spreadsheet excludes the Container Yard Operations task within the Transportation tab; however, the PWS includes this task (5.33). Would the Government clarify whether Container Yard Operations is a required task for this effort?

Container Yard Operations PWS 5.33 is included on the Transportation tab under column B in the first merged section. Depending on how TD-01 Workload opens up, Offeror may have to adjust the row height of the document to see all language. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

2 Key Personnel Is the ASP Supervisor/Lead at JBLE FLC2 and Ft Lee FLC1?

TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key has been updated. Ft Lee requires a FLC1 Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Inspector, and JBLE requires a FLC2 Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Supervisor Original Answer Remains Unchanged

3 CLIN Breakout Is CLIN 0002AA JBLE and CLIN 0002BA Fort Story?

No, CLIN 0003AA is JBLE and Ft Story PASSBACK. CLIN 0003AB is JBLE and Ft Story BASEOPS. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

4 Key Personnel Is there a requirement for Key or Non-Key personnel solely dedicated to Ft Story?

No, Any Key and Specified Non-Key personnel skill sets needed at Fort Story will be shared by JBLE. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

5 TD-01 and Attachment 0002

TD-01 shows CLIN 2CA belonging to Ft Lee. Attachment 2 – S&L Mix shows CLIN 2CA belonging to JBLE. Attachment 5 – Cost Price Matrix shows CLIN 2CA belonging to JBLE. Can you verify that the TD-01 labor hours need to be assigned to JBLE?

TD-01 Workload has been updated. CLIN 3CA is now aligned under JBLE.

Maintenance CLINs are now 3 series CLINs. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

6 CLIN Breakout Can you clarify the CLIN(s) that designated as JBLE, which are for Ft Eustis and which are for Ft Story? CLINs designated as JBLE are for both JBLE and Ft Story. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01, Maintenance Tab, Row 6, Task Column

The Task description matches the SCA Automotive Worker job description but there is no equivalent job category in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 0008 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk.

TD-01 Workload has been updated with correct task descriptions that now align to the crosswalk. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01, Maintenance Tab, Row 20, Task Column

The Task description matches the SCA Fabric Worker job description except for the last sentence which suggests a different labor category is desired but there is no equivalent job in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 0008 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement, if it is desired what repairs this employee will perform and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk.

TD-01 Workload has been updated with correct task descriptions. Hours associated with maintenance repair tasks have been realigned from the fabric task description to the correct maintenance task description. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01, Maintenance Tab, Row 32, Task Column

The Task description matches the SCA Personnel Assistant (Employment) II job description but there is no equivalent job category in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 0008 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk.

Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01, Supply Tab, Row 8, Task Column

The Task description is close to matching the SCA Material Handling Laborer job description but there is no equivalent job category in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 08 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk.

TD-01 Workload has been updated with correct task descriptions. Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01, Transportation Tab, Rows 3 and 4, Task Column

The Task description is close to matching the SCA Material Expeditor job description but there is no equivalent job category in Attachment 0016 CW to SCA, TD-06 Key Positions or Attachment 0008 CBA? Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement and if this labor category should be added to the Cross Walk.

TD-01 Workload has been updated with correct task descriptions. Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01, Transportation Tab, Row 11, Task Column The Task description is a fraction of the SCA Dispatcher Motor

Vehicle job description found in TD-01, Transportation Tab, Row 9. Please clarify if this is the desired Task requirement. The task description is correct. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01

Attachment 0005

TD-01 lists CLIN 0002CA as work at Fort Lee, VA, while Attachment 0005 lists CLIN 0002CA as work at JBLE. Will the Government please clarify this requirement?

TD-01 Workload has been updated. CLIN 0003CA is now aligned under JBLE.

Maintenance CLINs are now 3 series CLINs. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01

Attachment 0005

TD-01 lists CLINs 0002LA, MA, and NA; however there are no such CLINs listed in Attachment 0005. Will the Government please clarify the requirement?

TD-01 Workload has been updated. CLINs 0002LA, 0002MA, and 0002NA have been deleted. Hours associated with these CLINs have been reallocated to other CLINs. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01; Supply ASP

TD-01 requires an ASP Supply Support Administrative task that the TD-01 also specifies receives 4% HAZ uplift. This administrative position, as the task details, is an office support and does not handle hazardous materials Will the Government please clarify if this position requirement also handles hazardous materials or if the 4% HAZ uplift is justified/required?

Yes, this position should be proposed with 4% uplift due to the low hazard working environment and the location of the tasks being performed.

The requirement to propose a 4% premium for HAZMAT positions has been removed from TD-01 Workload. The CBA covers every position that involves hazardous material and the negotiated labor rate is inclusive of any hazmat differential." Therefore, no additional hazmat pay is required for CBA. Offerors are not to propose overtime premiums.

TD-01; Supply ASP

TD-06

There is a TD-01 ASP staffing requirement at Fort Lee;

however, there is no ASP Supervisor required in TD-06. Is this the Government's intent that the technically acceptable for there to be no dedicated FTE ASP Supervisor at Fort Lee?

The government has not identified a requirement for a dedicated FTE ASP supervisor at Fort Lee. However, TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key has been updated by identifying supervisory duties for the ASP under the Supply Operations Manager at Fort Lee. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-06, Page 9, Electronics Technician Maintenance– Specified Non-Key Position

The associated job description matches the SCA job description for an Electronics Technician Maintenance III and Attachment 0002, row 41, equates this job to a Electronics Technician Maintenance I. Please clarify the job description or categorization. Attachment 0002 has been updated to Electronics Technician Maintenance III. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-06, Page 6, Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Lead/ Inspector -Key Position

Attachment 0002, Row 33, equates this job category to an Ammunition Supply Point Specialist. Attachment 008 and Attachment 0016 do not have an equivalent position listed and Attachment 0002, Row 38 equates an Ammunition Specialist to an ASP Operations Specialist. Please clarify what job category the Ammunition Supply Point Specialist fits in to.

Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non- Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note:

Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0001, Page 42, Paragraph 5.4.5

Carpentry tasks are called out in this paragraph but no corresponding work load is in TD-01. Please clarify the requirement and/or work load required.

TD-01 Workload does not list every single detail/task required in PWS Section 5.

TD-01 provides the Minimum Functional Labor Category 1 Hours required to perform all PWS Section 5 paragraphs. During contract execution, the preponderance of FLC1 hours proposed will support the respective task/descriptions associated with the identified PWS paragraph number identified in TD-01. During contract execution, it is expected offerors will cross utilize labor categories to support ancillary tasks required by the PWS (e.g. mechanic performing carpentry tasks). Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0001, Page 56, Paragraph 5.33 Container Yard Operations tasks are called out in this paragraph but no corresponding work load is in TD-01. Please clarify the requirement and/or work load required.

Container Yard Operations PWS 5.33 is included on the Transportation tab under column B in the first merged section. Depending on how TD-01 Workload opens up, Offeror may have to adjust the row height of the document to see all language. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0016 As there is no associated job description, will the government clarify if the Order Filler II found in Attachment 0008, page 32 of 71, should be added to the Cross Walk as an Order Filler SCA code 21071? The Order Filler II position title has been added to the CBA-SCA crosswalk. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0016

As there is no associated job description, will the government clarify how the Property Technician (Supply) found in Attachment 0008, page 33 of 71, should be added to the Cross Walk?

The Property Technician (Supply) position title has been added to the CBA-SCA crosswalk.

The Government initially misidentified the Property Technician (Supply)/Property Book Specialist (non-key) as a CBA position under Fort Lee and incorrectly aligned this position title to the Property Book functions at Ft. Lee instead of aligning it to the Property Technician (Supply) (Non- Key) (Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP) requirement at JBLE. The Government has now corrected this misidentification. The minimum FLC1 hours in TD-01 Workload for Fort Lee Property Book functions remain unchanged but are now aligned to the correct CBA position title, Supply Technician. The Government also removed the Fort Lee requirements for a Property Technician (Supply)/Property Book Specialist (Non-Key) from Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor and from TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. The Government now has correctly identified the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) position in Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor (Row 44); TD-01 Workload (Row 7); and TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. TD-01 has been revised by realigning the workload hours under CLIN 0003AA.

Specifically the realignment consists of moving 1,864 hours from Row 6 "Automotive Repair" requirement to the newly created Row 7 "Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP)" requirement. Further, Attachment 0016 has been updated by removing Property Technician (Supply) from the Fort Lee CBA to SCA tab to the Fort Eustis CBA to SCA tab. The total maintenance minimum Functional Labor Category 1 hours remain unchanged at 108,112.

Attachment 0016 As there is no associated job description, will the government clarify how the Warehouse Specialist - Stock Readiness found in Attachment 0008, page 31 of 71, should be added to the Cross Walk?

The Warehouse Specialist - Stock Readiness position title has been added to the CBA-SCA crosswalk. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0016 There are two (2) crosswalks include in Attachment 0016: one

(1) for Fort Lee and the other labeled, "Fort Eustis." Does the Fort Eustis crosswalk also apply and include all labor categories for Langley and Fort Story, or if not, will the Government be providing those crosswalks?

Yes, the crosswalk titled Fort Eustis includes Joint Base Langley Eustis (JBLE) and Fort Story. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0016 On the Fort Lee crosswalk, will the Government please clarify what the difference is in labor categories: Production Control Clerk I and Production Control Clerk II so that offerors other than the incumbent can properly determine appropriate and technically acceptable staffing for these positions?

TD-01 Workload has been updated to delineate the appropriate tasks for both the Production Control I and Production Control II requirements. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Questions & Answers #59 and #78

TD-01

TD-06

Attachment 0008

The Government's answers points to an ES&H Clerk at JBLE;

however the TD-06 specifies this position is only at Fort Lee.

The similar requirements in the TD-01 are both for Fort Lee and the FLC-1 CBA position is only included in the Fort Lee CBA and absent from the JBLE CBA. Will the Government please refresh and clarify the requirements for both the Safety Coordinator and ES&H Clerk positions at Fort Lee and JBLE?

Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non- Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note:

Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-06

Attachment 0002

The JBLE Electronics Technician Maintenance, Lead is listed as a Specified Non-Key position in both the TD-06 and Attachment 0002; however, the JBLE Electronics Technician Maintenance (non-lead) position is listed in the TD-01 with the same Electronics Technician Maintenance III skills, but listed as the Electronics Technician Maintenance I in the Attachment 0002. Will the Government please clarify the requirement as there is no TD-06 requirement for an Electronics Technician Maintenance I at JBLE, but it is listed in the Attachment 0002 (duty title)?

Attachment 0002 has been updated from Electronics Technician Maintenance I to an Electronics Technician Maintenance III. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01

Attachment 0008 Attachment 0016

In the Maintenance Production Control task area there is an Administrative JBLE requirement very clearly specifying an Human Resources (HR)-related labor category not in Attachment 0008 or Attachment 0016, nor anything closely related to it. Will the Government please clarify this task description to more accurately depict this Production Control administrative requirement?

The task description is correct. Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01

TD-06

Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008 Attachment 0016

TD-01 requires one (1) full-time equivalent (FTE) Environmental Safety & Health (ES&H) Clerk at Fort Lee in each Maintenance Production Control as well as in Supply HAZ and Fuel. This is a TD-06 Program Management Office (PMO) Specified Non-Key position listed as FLC-1 in TD-06, and listed as a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) position in both the Attachment 0002 and Attachment 0008 at Fort Lee only. In the Attachment 0002, however, it is only specified as one (1) FTE in the PMO.

Will the Government please clarify this requirement in both locations, CLIN (PMO or respectively 0002DA and 0003GA), and quantities?

Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non- Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note:

Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01

TD-06

Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008 Attachment 0016

The TD-06 Supply ASP requirement lists a Lead position at Fort Lee and not JBLE; however, the TD-01 ASP Lead is listed under JBLE and not Fort Lee. There are many other inconsistencies as well with the ASP requirement that do not synch between the TD-01, TD-06, Attachment 0002, Attachment 0008, and Attachment 0016. Will the Government please clarify the ASP requirements at both Fort Lee and JBLE so they are consistent with all referenced documents?

Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non- Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note:

Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01, Transportation Material Support (the first two (2) line item tasks)

TD-06

Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008 Attachment 0016

The first task is a mix of some sort of lead/trainer in safety with Material Coordinator tasks mixed in. The second task is spot on Material Coordinator. There is no Material Coordinator, nor any like labor category in the TD-06, Attachment 0002, Attachment 0008, or Attachment 0016.

TD-01 Workload under Transportation Material Support (the first line item task) has been updated. Att0016 has also been updated aligning the Freight Specialist to a Material Coordinator. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

The only safety-related FLC-1/CBA position in any of these documents is the PMO ES&H Clerk, which is Specified Non-Key and only one (1) FTE on the Attachment 0002. This level of specificity with the safety requirement tasks, along with requiring a labor category that doesn't exist in the CBA has made staffing these two (2) requirements impossible. Will the Government please clarify these requirements in a way that aligns with Attachments 0002, 0008, 0016, and TD-06?

Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non- Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note:

Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01

TD-06

Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008 Attachment 0016

The Government has listed a requirement in both Maintenance and Supply (TD-06) for "Supply Support - Environmental Safety & Health" each at Fort Lee. This position is listed in the PMO at FLC-1/CBA as Specified Non-Key; however, the Attachment 0002 only lists one (1) FTE in the PMO. Will the Government please clarify this requirement in Maintenance and Supply or are these positions the same, just not Specified Non-Key in Maintenance and Supply?

Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non- Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note:

Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01

TD-06

Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008 Attachment 0016

The Government has listed a requirement in both Maintenance and Supply (TD-06) for "Supply/Support - Environmental Safety & Health" each at Fort Lee. This position is listed in the PMO at FLC-1/CBA as Specified Non-Key; however, the Attachment 0002 only lists one (1) FTE in the PMO. Since the PMO position is allocated under the PMO on Attachment 0002, are these PMO FLC-1 hours to be allocated against what functional area or none at all?

Updates have been made to the Attachment 0002, TD-06 Key and Specified Non- Key Positions, and TD-01 Workload to align position descriptions and titles. Note:

Some Key and Specified Non-Key position titles have been changed as well. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01

TD-06

Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008 Attachment 0016

Are there any non-CBA and strictly SCA labor category positions on the current contract?

Any FLC1 position titles not identified in Attachment 0016 should be proposed as SCA positions. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01

TD-06

Attachment 0002 Attachment 0008 Attachment 0016

Will the Government acknowledge that if there are any non- CBA and strictly SCA labor category positions on the current contract, and by disclosing them, they would negate any unfair technical, as well as pricing advantage (SCA is lower than CBA) provided to the incumbent who would be the only company with such knowledge?

The incumbent's current staffing solution will not be shared and is not equal to the requirements under this solicitation due to changes in the Government requirements. TD-01 identifies the need for 1864 hours of tasks that align to SCA labor category Personnel Assistant II. This position is NOT a CBA position and is a new requirement under this solicitation. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0005, Allocation_Tab_1b Row 321, Columns D through H, for entering the values for CLIN 0005 are blacked out. Should the contractor use Row 320 to enter these values? No Original Answer Remains Unchanged

BO8 exhibit B CDRL Listing The Government only provide a listing of the CDRLs and not the document itself. Will the Govt provide each of the documents similarly to other TOR issued?

The CDRL Portfolio contains one DD1423-1 to cover the CDRL requirements.

Details of each CDRL are now included within the Attachment 0001 PWS. The CDRL portfolio also contains all government provided CDRL formats. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-06 Key & Specified Non-Key Positions Fort Lee/JBLE Fort Story, VA

TD-06 JBLE/Fort Story lists Locksmith - Specified Non-Key Position and Supply Technician ASP - Specified Non-Key Position. The TD does not indicate if these are proposed as either FLC1 or FLC2 positions. Please clarify how these positions are classified.

TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions has been updated. Locksmith is 100% FLC1. Supply Technician ASP has been removed. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0016 CBA To SCA Crosswalk, Ft. Lee TAB.

The Fort Lee CBA has three labor categories, Order Filler II, Warehouse Specialist - Stock Readiness, and Property Technician (Supply), that were added by memorandums of understanding that were not included in Attachment 0016.

Please update Attachment 0016 to reflect these added positions. These labor categories have been added to Attachment 0016.

The Order Filler III, Warehouse Specialist-Stock Readiness have been added to Attachment 0016 under the Ft. Lee CBA to SCA tab. The Government initially misidentified the Property Technician (Supply) as a CBA position under Fort Lee and incorrectly aligned this position title to the Property Book functions at Ft. Lee instead of aligning it to the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) (Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP) requirement at JBLE. The Government has now corrected this misidentification. The minimum FLC1 hours in TD-01 Workload for Fort Lee Property Book functions remain unchanged but are now aligned to the correct CBA position title, Supply Technician. The Government also removed the Fort Lee requirements for a Property Book Specialist (Non-Key) from Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor and from TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. The Government now has correctly identified the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) position in Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor (Row 44); TD-01 Workload (Row 7);

and TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. TD-01 has been revised by realigning the workload hours under CLIN 0003AA. Specifically the realignment consists of moving 1,864 hours from Row 6 "Automotive Repair" requirement to the newly created Row 7 "Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP)" requirement.

Further, Attachment 0016 has been updated by removing Property Technician (Supply) from the Fort Lee CBA to SCA tab to the Fort Eustis CBA to SCA tab. The total maintenance minimum Functional Labor Category 1 hours remain unchanged at 108,112.

PWS Annex B Supply PRS The Supply PRS listed Task Requirement 5.16.1, PWS 5.16 is Reserved. Why does Annex B list a Task/Requirement that is Reserved? Annex B has been updated to reserve 5.16. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01 Workload Maintenance TAB. In the TD-01 Maintenance worksheet the PWS Requirement / Shop column lists Supporting Functions and Tasks with no PWS reference assigned, please address where the Supporting Functions and Task requirements align with the PWS requirements provided.

"Supporting Functions and Task" description has been removed from the PWS Requirement / Shop column. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

PWS 1.4.6.1 and 1.4.6.2

PWS 1.4.6.1 and PWS 1.4.6.2 reference compliance with Executive Order (EO) 13495, that EO was revoked on 31 October 2019, is the PWS reference still applicable?

Even though there is an Executive Order and the Department of Labor has taken some action, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Clause 52.222-17 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers remains in full force until such time as there is a change to the FAR (e.g a deviation)

Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Solicitation, p. 50, L.5.2.1.1(a)(3) The SMP currently has a 10 page limitation. In order to stay compliant and cover two installations, the org chart will not fit in one 11x17. Please consider adding two pages to the limitation for the org chart, or consider it out of page count.

The 10 page limitation will remain. 9 pages has been used before and there were no issues. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

45 RFP Section J Will the Govt provide missing documents Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Att 0008, Att 0012, and Att 0016 via SAMS BETA or email?

These exhibits and attachments were provided via DoD Safe. Updated documents for Amendment 0005 will also be provided in DoD Safe

Updated documents in Amendment 0010 will be provided in DoD Safe or beta.sam (look in both places)

46 Questions and Answers #85

RFP requests documentation for only the Accounting System, but not the Business Systems. Answer to question indicates Business Systems has been add at para L.5.1.6.2. There is no para L.5.1.6.2 in the RFP. Will the Govt provide an updated RFP? Amendment 0005 adds Section L, Paragraph L.5.1.6.2. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0015 Subcontractor Cost Info Submission

Instructions states in part, "…to the Government via FBO shall…" Since FBO is not a viable submission option, how does the Gov't want Subcontractor Cost Info submitted?

Reference Section L, Paragraph L.3 Proposal Submittal Instructions. Offerors may email proposals or submit proposals through Department of Defense DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) Original Answer Remains Unchanged

48 Proposal Due Date

Will the Gov't extend proposal submission due date -specifically give offerors a due date 30 days from date all missing documents received? Amendment 0005 will extend the due date

Amendment 0010 extends the proposal submission due date to 12:00 CST 30 July 2020

Attachment 0005, Cost/Price Matrix, Allocation_Tab_1b

CLIN 0005 on Allocation_Tab_1b is greyed out so Offerors cannot provide a price for these CLINs. Would the Government provide a corrected copy of Attachment 0005 to include fields in blue for Offerors to complete CLIN 0005? Attachment 0005 has been updated. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0007, DOL Wage Determination The Government provided WDs number 2015-4314, revision number 11 dated 07/16/2019, and number 2015-4341, revision number 11 dated 12/26/2018, as part of the solicitation. A more recent version of these WDs exist, revision number 13 dated 12/23/2019 and revision number 13 dated 12/23/2019, respectively. The updated WDs include the calendar year 2020 hourly minimum wage under Executive Order 13658 and for WD 2015-4341, the updated health & welfare rates as well.

Would the Government please confirm that: 1) the Government intended to provide one WD ending in an even number and one WD ending in an odd number and 2) Offerors are to use the provided prior revision number WDs for pricing purposes and not the current revision number WDs?

The Government intends to use Wage Determination 2015-4313, Revision 12, dated 23 December 2019 for Fort Lee and 2015-4341, Revision 13, dated 23 December 2019 for JBLE. Attachment 0007 has been updated to reflect these changes and offerors are to use these updated versions. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

RFP, Page 2, A.2 and All Questions and Answers Final

The RFP states "Please note that the Government answers provided in response to the feedback received on the DRAFT documents are not incorporated into this RFP." Will the Government verify that the answers to the questions have not incorporated and that these will be addressed in an amendment? The Government does not incorporate questions and answers into the RFP Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Solicitation page 61, paragraph L.5.4.2.12(a)(2) & Attachment 0008 Fort Lee CBA page 24

Solicitation page 61, paragraph L.5.4.2.12(a)(2) states that the CBA for Fort Lee expires on 31 March 2020 and Offerors will continue to use the last applicable rate(s) in force (without escalation) for the remainder of the period of performance.

However, the CBA for Fort Lee contains a set of labor rates that become effective October 2020. Should offerors use the October 2019 rates or the October 2020 rates for all periods?

In accordance with the CBA, written notice to terminate the agreement must be provided to the Government sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date of 31 Mar 2020. If this notice is not received, the CBA automatically renews itself for one (1) year periods. No such notice has been received and therefore the agreement will be extended for another year. With this extension, the October 2020 rates should be used. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

53 Attachment 0005, Allocation_Tab_1b

The IMD totals in row 9 are not inclusive of the labor and fee for CLINs 0003JA and 0003KA in rows 26-29. Would the Government provide a revised Attachment 0005 with these formulas corrected to include all CLINs under the IMD? Attachment 0005 has been updated. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Attachment 0005, Cost_Price_Abstract_1a

The IMD labor and fee totals in rows 8-9 are not inclusive of the labor and fee for CLINs 0003JA and 0003KA in rows 26-29 of Allocation_Tab_1b. Would the Government provide a revised Attachment 0005 with these formulas corrected to include all CLINs under the IMD? Attachment 0005 has been updated. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

55 TD-01 Workload - Supply - Row 19

Can the government confirm the FLC1 hours entered for Supply Support - ASP - Lead in cell F19, belong in CLIN 4AA? The correlating CBA with the lead position would seem like it would belong in CLIN 4CA instead.

Yes, the FLC1 hours entered for Supply Support - ASP - Lead in cell F19 belong in CLIN 4AA. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

56 Attachment 0005, Allocation_Tab_1b

This locked attachment contains formula errors, specifically , in the Allocation_Tab_1b, the summation contained in cells D9 – H9 do not capture all the costs contained in rows 10 – 29. This summation omits rows 25-29, resulting in an erroneous total for CPFF CLIN 0003. How are bidders to reconcile this error pursuant to the instruction contained in this section? Will the Government revise the form, correcting the errors so that bidders are not submitting defective proposals Attachment 0005 has been updated. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

57 RFP Section L.5.4.2.12

RFP section L.5.4.2.12, page 61 of 71 requires bidders to “escalate its proposed Exempt Base Labor rates, compounded by 3.4 for each option year.” Is this 3.4% or is the Government looking to increase salaries by 3.4% each year

The 3.4% increase compounded annually meaning: For example, the Offeror shall calculate the Option Year 1 proposed exempt labor rates by applying the 3.4% escalation to its proposed base exempt labor rates. The Offeror shall calculate the Option Year 2 proposed exempt labor rates by applying the 3.4% escalation to it proposed Option Year 1 labor rates. The Offeror shall calculate the Option Year 3 proposed exempt labor rates by applying the 3.4% escalation to its proposed Option Year 2 labor rates. The Offeror shall calculate the Option Year 4 proposed exempt labor rates by applying the 3.4% escalation to its proposed Option Year 3 labor rates. Section L.5.4.2.12(a)(4) has been updated to read in part "For proposal preparation purposes only, for the Option Years, the Offeror and its Subcontractor(s) SHALL escalate its proposed Exempt Base Labor Rates, compounded annually, by 3.4% for each option year..." Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01 Workload (Amend 0005) and B08 Attachment 0005 - Cost Price Matrix, and B08 Attachment 0002 - Staffing and Labor Mix

With Amendment 0005 the Government changed and realigned the CLIN numbering for all Maintenance, Supply, and Transportation for all hour assignments. B08 Attachment 0005 has not been revised or updated to reflect the TD-01 changes.

Can offerors assume B08 Attachment 0005 will be revised prior to the proposal submission date? Are pen and ink changes authorized to Attachment 0005 if a revised attachment is not issued?

Attachment 0005 has been updated. TD-01 and Attachment 0005 are matched

up. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Solicitation instructions paragraphs L.2.8, L.5.4.2.12(a)(2), and L.5.4.2.13(a)(1)

L.2.8 states the Offeror shall use 16 NOV 2020 as the Notice to Proceed (NTP) date. L.5.4.2.12(a)(2) and L.5.4.2.13(a)(1) state offerors should assume a 04 June 2020 Notice to Proceed date.

Please verify the correct Notice to Proceed date for proposal preparation.

The Notice to Proceed date is 16 November 2020. Section L has been updated to reflect the correct date. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Solicitation instructions L.5.4.2.13(b)(1)(i)

States Offeror shall provide budgetary rate data for 2020 through 2024. Later that paragraph states that explanations and calculations shall be provided for the basis of 2019 through 2024. Please confirm if the correct range is 2020 - 2024 for budgetary rate data. The Offeror shall provide budgetary rate data for years 2020 through 2024. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Solicitation instructions L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)States in L.5.2.1.1(c)(6)(viii) The Offeror must insert the corresponding shop or PWS requirement in the cells labeled "Shop or PWS Requirement." Please clarify there is no cells labeled Shop or PWS requirement. It only has CLINS? Section L has been updated to remove the "Shop or PWS requirement" language. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Q&A question 44 answer The 10 page limitation will remain. 9 pages has been used before and there were no issues. Solicitation Instructions in Amendment 00005

States in amendment 0005 L.5.2.1.1(a)(3) Page Limit:

Anticipate 6 Pages. Please clarify the correct page limitation for the SMP volume?

The correct page limitation is 10. Section L has been updated to reflect the correct page limitation. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

TD-01 Workload, Attachment 0002, and Attachment 0005

In the government provided documents, TD-01, attachment 2 and attachment 5, there seems to be a discrepancy on CLINS between the documents. In TD-01, there is a CLIN 5AB, and in attachment 2 and attachment 5 there is a CLIN 5BA. To ensure we are using the correct CLIN, will the government clarify which CLIN is correct?

TD-01 has been updated to align to Att0002 and Att0005. Within TD-01, CLIN 5AB has been changed to 5BA. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

AMD 0005 Q&A #2, 18, and 30

AMD 0005 TD-06

AMD 0005 Att0002

AMD 0005 TD-01

Q#2 states that Fort Lee requires an FLC1 Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Lead/Inspector. TD-06 and Att0002 show the requirement for an ASP Lead/Inspector. TD-01 shows a requirement for an FLC1 ASP Inspector at Fort Lee, not a Lead.

TD-01 usually shows where Leads are required in the task description.

Question: Will the government show the task line where the ASP Lead/Inspector is required at Fort Lee?

Changed answer to Q#2: TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key has been updated. Ft Lee requires a FLC1 Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Inspector, and JBLE requires a FLC2 Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Supervisor.

Updated TD-06, Fort Lee "ASP Lead/Inspector" has been changed to "ASP Inspector". Original Answer Remains Unchanged

AMD 0005 Q&A #9 and 28

AMD 0005 TD-01

Is it the Government's intent for an SCA Personnel Assistant to fill the Maintenance Administrative task requirement, or a CBA Order Filler II?

These tasks do not align to a CBA position and should be proposed as a SCA position. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

AMD 0005 Q&A #11

AMD 0005 TD-01

Is it the Government's intent to have an SCA Material Coordinator, or CBA Freight Specialist fill the task requirements? CBA Freight Specialist Original Answer Remains Unchanged

AMD 0005 Q&A #31

AMD 0005 TD-01

AMD 0005 ATT0016

The CBA Freight Specialist Labor Category is crosswalked to an SCA Material Handling Laborer. The SCA labor category is not sufficient to meet the TD-01 task requirements.

Question: Is it the Government's intent that an SCA Material Handling Labor skill level is sufficient to meet the CBA Freight Specialist tasks?

Changed answer to Q#31: TD-01 Workload under Transportation Material Support (the first line item task) has been updated. Att0016 has also been updated aligning the Freight Specialist to a Material Coordinator. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

AMD 0005 Q&A #8

AMD 0005 TD-01 The task description maps to CBA Fabric Worker. The last line added to the task maps to SCA Automotive Worker. Q&A #8 states hours associated with maintenance repair tasks have been realigned from the fabric task description to the correct maintenance task description.

Question: Is it the Government's intent that the CBA Fabric Worker be crossleveled with an SCA Automotive Worker. And if so, how many hours will be designated for the SCA Automotive Worker and how many for the CBA Fabric Worker?

Please see updated TD-01 for task description update and hour realignment. The changes made in reference to Q#8 did not save previously. Updates have now been made.

Yes, there should be a cross leveling of these tasks. The hours have been updated on TD-01 to show the designated hours for each task description. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

AMD 0005 RFP para L.3.1, L.3.5.1, and L5.4.2.10

Amd 5 RFP paras L.3.1 – L.3.5.1 and L.5.4.2.10 indicates respectively, “Offeror shall submit its proposal through the FedBizOpps system” and Subcontractor shall submit through FBO.gov.

Will the Government update the instructions to indicate correct submittal method? Section L has been updated with the correct submission method. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

AMD 0005 Q&A #22

AMD 0005 TD-01

AMD 0005 Att0016

Q&A # 22 stated that the CBA Property Technician (Supply) has been added to the CBA ATT0016 crosswalks the CBA Property Technician (Supply) to a SCA Supply Technician at significantly lower pay rate than the CBA Supply Technician crosswalked to an SCA Supply Technician labor category TD-01 describes Supply Division tasks mapped to CBA Supply Technicians and CBA Warehouse Specialists.

Question: The CBA Property Technician (Supply) tasks are not mapped to TD-01 tasks. Will the Government update TD-01 task descriptions to identify Property Technician (Supply) tasks?

Within TD-01, all CBA Property Technician (Supply) tasks are aligned to the Supply Support - Property Management requirement supporting PWS 5.18 Property Book Office.

The Government initially misidentified the Property Technician (Supply)/Property Book Specialist (non-key) as a CBA position under Fort Lee and incorrectly aligned this position title to the Property Book functions instead of aligning it to the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) (Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP) requirement at JBLE. The Government has now corrected this misidentification. The minimum FLC1 hours in TD-01 Workload for Fort Lee Property Book functions remain unchanged but are now aligned to the correct CBA position title, Supply Technician. The Government also removed the Fort Lee requirements for a Property Book Specialist (Non- Key) from Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor and from TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. The Government now has correctly identified the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) position in Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor (Row 44); TD-01 Workload (Row 7); and TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. TD-01 has been revised by realigning the workload hours under CLIN 0003AA. Specifically the realignment consists of moving 1,864 hours from Row 6 "Automotive Repair" requirement to the newly created Row 7 "Government Furnished Property (GFE) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP)" requirement. Further, Attachment 0016 has been updated by removing Property Technician (Supply) from the Fort Lee CBA to SCA tab to the Fort Eustis/JBLE CBA to SCA tab. The total maintenance minimum Functional Labor Category 1 hours remain unchanged at 108,112.

AMD 0005 Q&A #22

AMD 0005 TD-01

AMD 0005 Att0016

Q&A # 22 stated that the CBA Property Technician (Supply) has been added to the CBA ATT0016 crosswalks the CBA Property Technician (Supply) to a SCA Supply Technician at significantly lower pay rate than the CBA Supply Technician crosswalked to an SCA Supply Technician labor category TD-01 describes Supply Division tasks mapped to CBA Supply Technicians and CBA Warehouse Specialists.

Question: Is it the Government's intent for the CBA Property Technician (Supply) to be used in lieu of the CBA Supply Technician?

Only in the area within TD-01 aligned to the Supply Support - Property Management requirement supporting PWS 5.18 Property Book Office.

The Government initially misidentified the Property Technician (Supply)/Property Book Specialist (non-key) as a CBA position under Fort Lee and incorrectly aligned this position title to the Property Book functions instead of aligning it to the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) (Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP) requirement at JBLE. The Government has now corrected this misidentification. The minimum FLC1 hours in TD-01 Workload for Fort Lee Property Book functions remain unchanged but are now aligned to the correct CBA position title, Supply Technician. The Government also removed the Fort Lee requirements for a Property Book Specialist (Non- Key) from Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor and from TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. The Government now has correctly identified the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) position in Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor (Row 44); TD-01 Workload (Row 7); and TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. TD-01 has been revised by realigning the workload hours under CLIN 0003AA. Specifically the realignment consists of moving 1,864 hours from Row 6 "Automotive Repair" requirement to the newly created Row 7 "Government Furnished Property (GFE) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP)" requirement. Further, Attachment 0016 has been updated by removing Property Technician (Supply) from the Fort Lee CBA to SCA tab to the Fort Eustis/JBLE CBA to SCA tab. The total maintenance minimum Functional Labor Category 1 hours remain unchanged at 108,112.

AMD 0005 Q&A #22

AMD 0005 TD-01

AMD 0005 Att0016

Q&A # 22 stated that the CBA Property Technician (Supply) has been added to the CBA ATT0016 crosswalks the CBA Property Technician (Supply) to a SCA Supply Technician at significantly lower pay rate than the CBA Supply Technician crosswalked to an SCA Supply Technician labor category TD-01 describes Supply Division tasks mapped to CBA Supply Technicians and CBA Warehouse Specialists. CBA Property Technical (Supply) are not mapped.

Question: Is it the Government's intent for the CBA Property Technical (Supply) to be used in lieu of CBA Warehouse Specialists in the Supply Division?

No, the CBA Property Technical (Supply) is only in the area within TD-01 aligned to the Supply Support - Property Management requirement supporting PWS 5.18 Property Book Office.

It is not the Government's intent for the CBA Property Technical (Supply) to be used in lieu of CBA Warehouse Specialists in the Supply Division. The Property Technician (Supply) has been moved from the Fort Lee tab to the Eustis tab within the CBA SCA crosswalk. The Property Technician (Supply) has been added to TD-06 and the Staffing & Labor Mix document as a Non-Key position. TD-01 has been updated using the tasks description from TD-06 to align hours to the JBLE maintenance CLIN.

AMD 0005 Q&A #22

AMD 0005 TD-01

AMD 0005 Att0016

TD-01 describes Supply Division tasks mapped to CBA Supply Technicians and CBA Warehouse Specialists. CBA Property Technical (Supply) are not mapped.

Question: What Supply Division work areas do the CBA Property Technician (Supply) work in CIF, SSA, or CIPBO? CIPBO

The Property Technician (Supply) is actually under the maintenance tab in TD-01 Workload, CLIN 0003AA JBLE. The Government initially misidentified the Property Technician (Supply) as a CBA position under Fort Lee and incorrectly aligned this position title to the Property Book functions at Ft. Lee instead of aligning it to the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) (Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP) requirement at JBLE. The Government has now corrected this misidentification. The minimum FLC1 hours in TD-01 Workload for Fort Lee Property Book functions remain unchanged but are now aligned to the correct CBA position title, Supply Technician. The Government also removed the Fort Lee requirements for a Property Book Specialist (Non-Key) from Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor and from TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. The Government now has correctly identified the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) position in Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor (Row 44); TD-01 Workload (Row 7);

and TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. TD-01 has been revised by realigning the workload hours under CLIN 0003AA. Specifically the realignment consists of moving 1,864 hours from Row 6 "Automotive Repair" requirement to the newly created Row 7 "Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP)" requirement.

Further, Attachment 0016 has been updated by removing Property Technician (Supply) from the Fort Lee CBA to SCA tab to the Fort Eustis CBA to SCA tab. The total maintenance minimum Functional Labor Category 1 hours remain unchanged at 108,112.

AMD 0005

Attachment 0016

On the Fort Eustis tab, the CBA start date should be 07/01/2019

vs. the 10/01/2019.

Question: Will the provide a revised Attachment 0016 with the correct CBA start date? The CBA SCA Crosswalk has been updated to 10/01/2019. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

AMD 0005

Section L, Page 20; L.5.4.2.12(a)(1) & L.5.4.2.12(a)(2)

It states the Ft. Lee CBA expires on 31 March 2020 but it should end on 31 March 2021.

Question: Will the Government revise the CBA expiration date in Section L?

Section L has been updated with the correct expiration date of 31 March 2021. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

RFP and Amds We noticed that the solicitation calls for premium pay; however, we cannot find the rate for that premium pay. Would the Government provide the rate?

The requirement to propose a 4% premium for HAZMAT positions has been removed from TD-01 Workload. The CBA covers every position that involves hazardous material and the negotiated labor rate is inclusive of any hazmat differential." Therefore, no additional hazmat pay is required for CBA. Offerors are not to propose overtime premiums. Original Answer Remains Unchanged

Amd 6, Att 0002, and Q&A #73

Q&A states the CBA Property Technician (Supply) is mapped to the CIPBO Section. ATT0002 has the CIPBO positions mapped to a CBA Supply Technician with a Non-Key job title of Property Book Specialist.

Q&A says it's a Property Technician (Supply) ($25.79), but Att0002 shows a Supply Technician ($29.63).

Question: Which is correct, the Q&A or Att 0002? The Q&A is correct. Att0002 has been updated to align the Property Book

Specialist to the CBA Property Technician (Supply).

The Government initially misidentified the Property Technician (Supply)/Property Book Specialist (non-key) as a CBA position under Fort Lee and incorrectly aligned this position title to the Property Book functions at Ft. Lee instead of aligning it to the Property Technician (Supply) (Non- Key) (Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP) requirement at JBLE. The Government has now corrected this misidentification. The minimum FLC1 hours in TD-01 Workload for Fort Lee Property Book functions remain unchanged but are now aligned to the correct CBA position title, Supply Technician. The Government also removed the Fort Lee requirements for a Property Book Specialist (Non- Key) from Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor and from TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. The Government now has correctly identified the Property Technician (Supply) (Non-Key) position in Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor (Row 44); TD-01 Workload (Row 7); and TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key. TD-01 has been revised by realigning the workload hours under CLIN 0003AA. Specifically the realignment consists of moving 1,864 hours from Row 6 "Automotive Repair" requirement to the newly created Row 7 "Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP)" requirement. Further, Attachment 0016 has been updated by removing Property Technician (Supply) from the Fort Lee CBA to SCA tab to the Fort Eustis CBA to SCA tab. The total maintenance minimum Functional Labor Category 1 hours remain unchanged at 108,112.

Amd 6, Att 0002, and Q&A #73

Referring to above question: If the Q&A is the correct Labor Category for the CIPBO Section, will the Government provide an updated ATT0002 with the correct CBA Labor Category mapping for the Non-key Property Book Specialist?

Att0002 has been updated to align the Property Book Specialist to the CBA Property Technician (Supply).

The Government initially misidentified the Property Technician (Supply) as a CBA position under Fort Lee and incorrectly aligned this position title to the Property Book functions…