B08 All Questions and Answers Final.pdf

Question # Question Reference (RFP #, PWS #, etc.) Question Answer

1 JBLE Site Visit Introduction Whose responsibility is it to transport ammunition from JBLE to Fort Story?

The Government

2 JBLE Site Visit Introduction Is there an Army requirement for rail? No, the Air Force is responsible for rail operations.

3 JBLE Site Visit Introduction There is Level 1 maintenance at JBLE. Is there level 2 and 3 elsewhere?

The contract inclusive of the PWS statement does not define maintenance in terms of levels. The contractor is required to perform maintenance in accordance with the PWS inclusive of all referenced documents (e.g. Army Publications) and the density list.

Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) Repair Facility, Bldg. 1411 Are special tools managed by Contractor?

All tools assigned as Government Furnished Equipment are managed by the Contractor

5 ASP Repair Facility, Bldg. 1411 Is there a corrosion control plan and is this taken care of on a timeline or as needed?

Contractor will follow the Army Corrosion Control Plan IAW established Army Regulations.

6 ASP Repair Facility, Bldg. 1411 How are small arms controlled and stored?

Only those small arms being repaired are stored at the repair facility. All other storing of small arms are the responsibility of the individual Units.

7 ASP Repair Facility, Bldg. 1411 What's the responsibility of managing inventory outside of repair shops?

The contractor is not responsible for managing inventory outside of the repair shops

8 ASP Repair Facility, Bldg. 1411 What is the procedure for the purchase of shop stock?

The contractor will purchase shop stock through the appropriate Logistics Information System (LIS) (i.e. Global Combat Support System- Army (GCSS-A). If items are not available through the LIS, the contractor shall submit a Purchase Request for Government approval to purchase shop stock under the other direct cost CLINs.

9 Paint Booths, Bldg. 1411,1417, 1420 Is there forced air?

Breathable air is available in Bldg. 1411 (Paint Booth, Allied Trades), 1417 (Large Paint Booth) and 1420 (Blast Booth). Portable devices are also available. There is forced air in all of the paint booths.

10 Paint Booths, Bldg. 1417 Are there any lifts in the bays? Portable lifts are available as needed

11 ASP Magazines, Bldg. 3711 Is there a requirement for ground maintenance?

No Contractor requirement, it is managed by the Air Force, Civil Engineering Division.

12 ASP Magazines, Bldg. 3711 Any requirement for maintenance on ammunition?

Maintenance has no requirement with ammunition other than maintenance on MHE equipment. The contractor is responsible for repackaging of smoke and pyro as needed.

13 Container repair shop, Bldg. 1411 Is the contractor responsibility for container movement?

No. However, the contractor is responsible for movement of the containers inside the maintenance compound. The Military Units are responsible for containers movement to and from the maintenance facility.

14 ASP Magazines. Bldg. 3711 Is there vehicle inspection at ASP?

Yes, the contractor is responsible for vehicle compliance IAW applicable Regulations, Standard Operating Procedures, etc. at the ASP.

15 Container repair shop, Bldg. 1411 Contractor responsibility to manage or issue containers? No 16 Container repair shop, Bldg. 1411 Any fiber glass repair? Yes. Some body work repair is fiber glass.

17 Container repair shop, Bldg. 1411 Are there established repair cycle times for units?

The contractor is required to build maintenance plans for the Army Support Activities including the Contractor's GFE and the Garrison equipment. The repair cycle times are for equipment only and are found through the approved Logistics Information System (LIS).

18 Container repair shop, Bldg. 1411 Any allied trades requirement for Contractor? Yes, See PWS Paragraph 5.4

19 Lee Site Visit Introduction What year is the density in site visit slides?

The slides pertaining to the density list presented at the site visit represent FY18.

However, offerors are reminded to propose to the requirements/density list provided in the solicitation.

20 Lee Site Visit Introduction What size are the busses used in support of the Ft. Lee mission?

The busses at Fort Lee range from 16 to 44 passenger. All bus operators require Commercial Drivers License.

21 Lee Site Visit Introduction Does the Government provide an office for the contractor. Yes

Hazardous Material Management Program Who issues Safety Data Sheets?

Government issues Safety Data Sheets.

23 Transportation Motor Pool Does the Contractor use LRC vehicles or company vehicle to perform contract requirements?

The contractor can use LRC vehicles through normal dispatching procedures from the transportation motor pool. The contractor is not required to provide motor vehicles to perform the task order.

Travel Office; Personal Property Processing Office (PPPO)

Is the contractor required to surge personnel during the peak travel season?

No, the number of FLC1 hours attributable to Personal Property Processing Office accounts for year round workload.

25 Supply Support Activity Do the contractor transport HAZMAT to Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office (DRMO)?

No. The contractor is required to transport non-HAZMAT material (e.g. scrap metal) to Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Disposition Services.

26 Maintenance Shop What is painted in paint shops?

Vehicles, forklifts, containers, etc. Anything can be painted but mostly passback equipment.

27 Maintenance Shop Is there a requirement for the contractor to provide maintenance to emergency vehicles at Lee or other bases?

The contractor is not required to perform maintenance on emergency vehicles at JBLE. The contractor is responsible to perform maintenance on emergency vehicles at Fort Lee, see TD-02 Maintenance Density List

28 Lee Site Visit Introduction How many Contracting Officers Representative (CORs)?

The Government anticipates two (2) CORs will be appointed for the non-reimbursable customers, 1 at Lee and 1 at JBLE. Reimbursable customers will most likely have their own COR.

29 Lee Site Visit Introduction Is there a requirement for Dining Facility equipment Maintenance?

Dining Facility Maintenance is not being solicited as a part of this task order.

30 Lee Site Visit Introduction Is payment difference between Lee and JBLE? Yes, Fort Lee and JBLE has separate CLINs and funding streams.

31 ASP Magazines

At the site visit offerors were told that the contractor will need to provide water and a porta-potty. There is no mention of this in the PWS - please confirm this is contractor-provided. If so, will the contractor be reimbursed for this expense.

Water is purchased by the contractor utilizing an ODC CLIN for the ASP. The Porta- Potty is a Government expense/ responsibility. At the Ammunition Supply Point there is no running water or utilities.

Exhibit A, TD-01 Workload, Supply Section

Issue: Productive Man Hours is calculated at 1864. Under the Supply Section, paragraph 5.19, the first task line – Supply Support – Stock Readiness. The minimum FLC1 hours is listed as 1865.

Question: Will the Government correct from 1865 to 1864. At 1865 we would have to add 0.01 to the FLC count to ensure we meet the minimum FLC1 hours on Att0002.

The Government has updated Exhibit A, TD-01 Workload to reflect 1,864 hours.

Mission Essential Contractor Services As Defined In DFARS 252.237.7023

Material Maintenance Operations. Supervisor and mechanics necessary to respond and repair Alert Rapid Deployment Forces if crisis demands. In order to determine manpower requirements, the Contractor will need to know mission and equipment that are required to be supported for the Alert Rapid Deployment Forces.

Question: Is there a reporting timeline for this mission? What are task requirements for the JBLE Supervisor and mechanics?

Specific mission requirements for Alert Rapid Deployment Forces will be briefed to the contractor when known. In accordance with, PWS Paragraph 1.4.2.1 the contractor shall ramp up travel and begin work within 72 hours from Notice to Proceed from the Contracting Officer. The contractor shall provide the required FLC1 and FLC2 personnel to meet workload requirements.

PWS 5.4 PWS 5.4.5 "Perform carpentry tasks required for the repair or modification of any Government owned, tactical or commercial equipment and customer requested fabrication."

Question: Are these tasks required to be performed at Fort Lee and JBLE?

JBLE - YES

FT.LEE -NO

PWS 5.1, Maintenance Requirements and Capabilities

The JBLE maintenance capabilities and capacity differs from some of the Fort Lee capabilities.

Question: Can maintenance work be performed at JBLE to support the Fort Lee workload or backload?

No

Fort Lee/JBLE/Fort Story Site Visit, July 31, 2019

The Quality Assurance Specialist Ammunition Surveillance (QASAS) indicated that JBLE ammunition residue is not being turned-in to Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Norfolk. The hold on residue turn-in is due to JBLE not receiving reimbursement to the installation for turn-in of ammunition residue. Therefore, ammunition residue is being maintained in the ASP.

Question: Are there any issues with ammunition residue being turned-in to DLA Richmond from the Fort Lee Ammunition Supply Point (ASP)?

Currently, at the JBLE residue yard , the contractor is required to process spent brass from all sources. Subsequently the contractor is responsible for transporting processed spent brass from JBLE residue yard to the Fort Lee residue yard. At Fort Lee, the contractor is also required to process spent brass from all sources.

The contractor is required to transport all processed spent brass at Ft. Lee, including processed spent brass from JBLE, to the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Disposition Services. Note at the Government discretion, the Contractor may be required to transport processed spent brass to DLA Disposition Services directly from both JBLE and Ft. Lee.

PWS 5.1 Maintenance Certification The JBLE Logistics Readiness Center supports the 7th Transportation Brigade (Expeditionary) which has maritime equipment and boats.

Question: Are there any marine certification requirements for the maintenance employees that work on the maritime equipment or components?

NO. There are "NO" marine certification requirements for the maintenance employees that work on the maritime equipment or components.

PWS 5.22.4, page 49 Based on AMC-R-350-4 dated 22 November 2017, there are several mandatory training courses that require renewal during the life of the contract. Specific courses are residency courses offered only by the DoD, and are not available at Fort Lee or Fort Eustis. Will TDY expenses be reimbursable by the government?

PWS Paragraph 1.3.2 states in relevant part "The contractor shall provide the appropriate amount of qualified labor and management with required training, skills and experience in order to accomplish the work required under this PWS. The contractor shall not allow any employee that is not certified, trained or licensed for a particular task to perform such work. The contractor, at its own expense shall maintain all qualifications and certifications required to perform the requirements of this PWS."

PWS 5.1 Maintenance Support Question: What support is provided to the TACOM Watercraft Inspection Branch? Are there any established Memorandums of Understanding or Memorandums of Agreements?

No Support is provided to the TACOM Watercraft Branch at this time. (No longer a Customer on the Task Order)

TD-01 Maint Level of effort and PWS, Section C-5: Req.

TD-01 shows a Level of effort for Supporting Functions and Tasks section however, the PWS has no corresponding paragraph. If this is correct will the USG update the PWS?

The Government will not update the PWS. The PWS is correct. The Government has updated TD-01 to reflect the corresponding PWS paragraph.

TD-01 Maint Level of effort , Allied Trades

The TD-01 shows the requirement for a Motor Vehicle Body with a Task description for repair of fiberglass automobile bodies. I would seem that it would be more appropriate for a repair of metal for vehicles/equipment?

The Government has updated TD-01 as Allied Trades -Fiberglass/Motor Equipment Metal to support the task required as well as to reflect the corresponding PWS paragraph.

TD-01 Maint Level of effort and PWS, Section C-5: Req.

TD-01 shows a Level of effort for Arms and Sensitive Items Storage however, the PWS has no corresponding paragraph. If this is valid will the USG update the PWS?

The Government will not update the PWS. The PWS is correct. The Government has updated TD-01 to reflect the corresponding PWS paragraph.

TD-01 Maint Level of effort , Arms and Sensitive Storage Req.

The TD-01 shows Weapon Repair with a Task description for repairs, rebuilds, or overhauls major assemblies. Will the govt update the TD to reflect Weapon Repair?

TD-01 has been updated to reflect weapon repair.

TD-01 Maint Level of effort and PWS, Section C-5: Req.

TD-01 shows a Level of effort for Technical Inspections however, the PWS has no corresponding paragraph. Will the PWS be updated to reflect the work?

The Government will not update the PWS. The PWS is correct. The Government has updated TD-01 to reflect the corresponding PWS paragraph.

TD-06 page 6 & 9 and TD-01 Safety coordinators are identified for both sites as The Safety Coordinator is a 100% FLC1 position however there is no work load identified in the TD-01. Will the government update TD-01 with the appropriate work load?

The Government has updated TD-01. The Government has updated TD-06 Safety Coordinator to FLC2.

TD-06 page 5 and TD-01 Personal property Counselor is identified as 100% FLC1 position however there is no work load identified in the TD-01. Will the government update TD-01 with the appropriate work load?

The Gov't has updated TD-01 with the appropriate work load. The Gov't has also updated TD-06 to remove Personal Property Counselor.

Attachment 0002 - Staffing and Labor Mix

In the example Tab columns F and G row 5-6 shows 2 CBAs Each with different hours. In the Staffing and Labor Mix tab Column G row 4 shows one CBA with no hours. Is it the intent of the USG to update the tab to reflect the two CBAs in effect along with the appropriate hours?

Attachment 0002 has been updated to reflect both collective bargaining agreements.

TD-01 Workload M-S-T CLIN breakout in Maintenance and Supply tabs in the M-S-T do not readily identify direct labor man-hours associated to Fort Lee and those aligned to JBLE. Will the USG define Fort Lee and JBLE CLINs in the final RFP?

Attachment 0005, Allocation_Tab_1b specifies a CLIN for each functional area and site. TD-01 is updated to provide the specific CLIN. The Offeror should review all documents related to this effort to ensure all requirements are achievable.

TD-01 Workload M-S-T, Maintenance Tab

Task Description for Weapons Repair - Small Arms appears incorrect and lists vehicle mechanic tasks. Repairs, rebuilds, or overhauls major assemblies of internal combustion automobiles, buses, trucks or tractors. Work involves most of the following:

Diagnosing the source of trouble and determining the extent of repairs required; replacing worn or broken parts such as piston rings, bearings, or other engine parts; grinding and adjusting valves; rebuilding carburetors; overhauling transmissions; and repairing fuel injection, lighting, and ignition systems. This includes repairs of small arm weapon systems. Will this be corrected in the final RFP?

TD-01 has been updated to reflect the correct task description.

Exhibit A, TD-01 Maintenance Workload and PWS, Section C-5:

Requirements

TD-01 shows a workload for Arms and Sensitive Items Storage however, the PWS has no corresponding paragraph. Is the workload valid and the requirement needs to be added to the

PWS?

The Government will not update the PWS. The PWS is correct. The Government has updated TD-01 to reflect the corresponding PWS paragraph.

Exhibit A, TD-01 Maintenance Workload and PWS, Section C-5:

Requirements

TD-01 shows a workload for Technical Inspections however, the PWS has no corresponding paragraph. Is the workload valid and the requirement needs to be added to the PWS?

The Government will not update the PWS. The PWS is correct. The Government has updated TD-01 to reflect the corresponding PWS paragraph.

Exhibit A, TD-01 Maintenance Workload and PWS, Section C-5:

Requirements

TD-01 shows a workload for Supporting Functions and Tasks however, the PWS has no corresponding paragraph. Is the workload valid and the requirement needs to be added to the

PWS?

In the draft RFP the Government did not properly identify the PWS workload for Supporting Functions and Tasks on TD-01. The Government has updated TD-01 with the corresponding PWS paragraph/workload for supporting functions and tasks.

Exhibit A, TD-01 Maintenance Workload, Allied Trades

The TD-01 shows the requirement for a Motor Vehicle Body with a Task description for repair of fiberglass automobile bodies.

Should not the Task description be for the repair of metal for vehicles/equipment?

The Government has updated TD-01 as Allied Trades -Fiberglass/Motor Equipment Metal to support the task required as well as to reflect the corresponding PWS paragraph.

Exhibit A, TD-01 Maintenance Workload, Arms and Sensitive Storage Requirements

The TD-01 shows Weapon Repair with a Task description for repairs, rebuilds, or overhauls major assemblies. Is this the correct Task description?

No, TD-01 has been updated to reflect the correct task description.

Exhibit A, TD-01 Maintenance Workload, Production Control and Supporting Functions and Tasks

On the TD-01 there is a requirement for Administrative. Will the Government verify that this is the correct Task description?

The Gov't usage of the term Administrative is workload required to support the requirement. The Task description is accurate.

Attachment 0002 and Attachment

Attachment 0008 consists of two separate and distinct CBAs, one for Ft Lee and one for JBLE. The Attachment 0002 only allows for one CBA in the Proposed Hours per FTE while the Example shows two CBAs. Will the Government reissue the Attachment 0002 with two CBAs or provide the contractor with the Proposed Hours that they want used in the single CBA?

The Government has update Attachment 0002 Staffing/Labor Mix to reflect two CBAs.

Attachment 0002 and Attachment

Attachment 0002, Column F, Row 16 shows CLIN 0006. Should this not be CLIN 0005 as specified in Attachment 0005, PMO Labor?

Attachment 0002, Column F, Row 16 has been updated to reflect CLIN 0005 as specified in Attachment 0005, PMO Labor.

Exhibit A, TD-06, LRC Lee, Paragraph 4 and JBLE/Story, Paragraph 4

Both of the referenced paragraphs specify the requirement for a Safety Coordinator (Specified Non-Key Position). As there is no corresponding workload in TD-01 nor is this position pre-populated in Attachment 0002, will the Government clarify if this requirement is an additional labor category to be listed in Attachment 0002 or is this an additional duty for the Environmental Safety Health (ESH) Technician?

The Government has updated TD-01 to reflect the requirement for Environmental Safety and Health. The Government has updated TD-06 Safety Coordinator to FLC2. Safety Coordinator may be an additional requirement for the Environmental Safety Health (ESH) Clerk at JBLE.

Attachment 0001, page 42/58, Paragraph 5.4 Allied Trades

Painting and maintaining/operating paint booths is a requirement in this section. Is the contractor responsible for painting complete vehicles or only 'spot' paint a vehicle? Is there a requirement for CARC painting? Is the Government responsible for any and all permits and Federal/State/local taxes associated with use of volatile organic compounds (VOC) or particulate matter compounds?

The Contractor is responsible for painting complete equipment/vehicles or 'spot' paint equipment or a vehicle as requirement dictates. Complete painting may include application of Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC) in accordance with the Army Corrosion Control Program. The Government is responsible for any and all permits and Federal/State/local taxes associated with use of volatile organic compounds (VOC) or particulate matter compounds. However, the Contractor is responsible for monthly reporting (CDRL) that identifies all paint compounds used to include VOC information.

Attachment 0001, PWS Is there any requirement for maintenance on watercraft? No Support is provided to the TACOM Watercraft Branch at this time. (No longer a

Customer on the Task Order)

TD-01, Workload - Maintenance Tab Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk

The Automotive Repair requirement on TD-01, lists tasks defined in the SCA Dictionary as an Automotive Worker.

However, no Automotive Worker is outlined on the Ft. Eustis CBA to SCA Crosswalk. Have there been any modifications to the CBA or the CBA to SCA Crosswalk that include Automotive Worker? If not, how does the USG intent for contractor's to propose this labor category?

The CBA to SCA crosswalk identifies all positions currently on the two CBAs.

Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

TD-01, Workload - Maintenance Tab Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk

The Administrative requirement on TD-01, lists tasks defined in the SCA Dictionary as a Personnel Assistant III. However, no Personnel Assistant III is outlined on the Ft. Eustis CBA to SCA Crosswalk. Have there been any modifications to the CBA or the CBA to SCA Crosswalk that include Personnel Assistant III?

If not, how does the USG intent for contractor's to propose this labor category?

The CBA to SCA crosswalk identifies all positions currently on the two CBAs.

Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

TD-01, Workload - Maintenance Tab Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk

There is a Technical Inspections requirement for JBLE listed on the TD-01. However, on the CBA to SCA Crosswalk, there is no "inspector" listed for JBLE to assign these tasks. Can the USG provide additional information as to which labor category shown on the CBA to SCA Crosswalk conducts technical inspections in the maintenance functional area for JBLE.

The CBA to SCA crosswalk identifies all positions currently on the two CBAs.

Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

TD-01, Workload - Maintenance Tab Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk

The Automotive Repair requirement, on TD-01, lists tasks defined in the SCA Dictionary as an Automotive Worker.

However, no Automotive Worker is outlined on the Ft. Eustis CBA to SCA Crosswalk. Have there been any modifications to the CBA or the CBA to SCA Crosswalk that include Automotive Worker? If not, how does the USG intent for contractor's to propose this labor category?

The CBA to SCA crosswalk identifies all positions currently on the two CBAs.

Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

TD-01, Workload - Supply Tab Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk TD-06, Key and Specified Non-Key Positions Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix

The TD-01 and TD-6 for JBLE Clin 3AA shows an ASP Lead as a FLC1 position. However, the Attachment 0002 lists this position as FLC2. There is no ASP Lead in the CBA to SCA Crosswalk. Can the government clarify if the ASP Lead position is FLC1 or FLC2? If FLC1, please provide a corrected Attachment 0002. If FLC2, the Option Period Total Proposed FLC1 Hours by Functional Area section of Attachment 0002 needs to be updated to remove the hours as FLC1.

The Gov't has updated the ASP Lead on Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix to indicate the ASP Lead (Key Position) is FLC1.

TD-01, Workload Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix

On the JBLE CBA to SCA Crosswalk, the following positions were listed, but do not clearly correspond to an indicated position under any requirement listed on TD-01. Can the government please include a requirements outline in the TD-01, in order that contractors can determine where these positions are included in the labor force and associated CLINs on Attachment 0002? Positions include: Data Entry Operator II, Gunsmith III, Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Mechanic, Motor Vehicle Mechanic Helper, Pneumatic Systems Mechanics, Sewing Machine Operator, Tire Repairer, and Woodworker. Without outlining the requirement for these positions in the TD-01, the contractor cannot determine which CLIN the work falls under on Attachment 0002.

The CBA to SCA crosswalk identifies all positions currently on the two CBAs.

Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

TD-01, Workload - Transportation Tab Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix

On the TD-01, the first requirement (Fleet Support) corresponds to two SCA positions, Parking and Lot Attendant and Scheduler, Maintenance. Neither of those two positions are listed on the CBA to SCA Crosswalk. Can the government provide a more detailed requirement on the TD-01 that more aligns with the corresponding position on the CBA to SCA Crosswalk? Without clarification on the customer's specific requirement, the contractor cannot properly complete Attachment 0002 for this position.

The CBA to SCA crosswalk identifies all positions currently on the two CBAs.

Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

TD-01, Workload Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix

On the Fort Lee CBA to SCA Crosswalk, the following positions were listed, but do not clearly correspond to an indicated position under any requirement listed on TD-01. Can the government please include a requirements outline in the TD-01, in order that contractors can determine where these positions are included in the labor force and associated CLINs on Attachment 0002? Positions include: Carpenter, Maintenance, Electronic Tech, Maint III, Heavy Equipment Operator, Special Equipment Mechanic, and Welder, Material Maintenance.

Without outlining the requirement for these positions in the TD- 01, the contractor cannot determine which CLIN the work falls under on Attachment 0002.

The CBA to SCA crosswalk identifies all positions currently on the two CBAs.

Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

TD-01, Workload Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix

On TD-06 under LRC LEE, there are several positions which are described and listed as FLC1 positions. However, they are not included in the CBA to SCA Crosswalk, nor are they clearly outlined on the TD-01, ensuring that contractors can propose the correct position with the correct title under the correct CLIN on Att 2. Those positions include: Personal Property Counselors, Safety Coordinator, and Property Book Specialist. Can the government provide a detailed requirement on the TD-01, which outlines the positions in question in order that the contractor can properly propose the labor category under the correct CLIN on Attachment 0002? In addition, can the government include the correct labor category title in the CBA to SCA Crosswalk for these positions?

The CBA to SCA crosswalk identifies all positions currently on the two CBAs.

Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

TD-01, Workload Attachment 0016, CBA to SCA Crosswalk Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix

On TD-06 under LRC JBLE/Fort Story, there are several positions which are described and listed as FLC1 positions.

However, they are not included in the CBA to SCA Crosswalk, nor are they clearly outlined on the TD-01, ensuring that contractors can propose the correct position with the correct title under the correct CLIN on Att 2. Those positions include: ASP Operations, and Safety Coordinator. Can the government provide a detailed requirement on the TD-01, which outlines the positions in question in order that the contractor can properly propose the labor category under the correct CLIN on Attachment 0002? In addition, can the government include the correct labor category title in the CBA to SCA Crosswalk for these positions?

The Government has updated Attachment 0002 to indicate the updated positions associated with TD-06 Key and Specified Non-Key Positions. The Gov't has provided a detailed task description for ASP Operations Specialist position on TD-

01. The Government has updated TD-06 Safety Coordinator to FLC2. The Gov't has provided the labor category title in the CBA to SCA Crosswalk. The CBA to SCA crosswalk identifies all positions currently on the two CBAs. Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix

Can the government provide an example or a discussion on what information belongs on Attachment 0002 in cells H4 through K4? The example tab in Attachment 0002 does not include these cells.

Contract Name (i.e. HAZMAT, TMP) PoP Date

Attachment 0002 Staffing/Labor mix has been revised removing Contract Name, (i.e. HAZMAT, TMP), PoP Date from H4 through K4

TD-01, Workload TD-06, Key and Specified Non-Key Positions Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix Attachment 0008, CBA

Both CBA's indicate Foreman positions will receive a premium pay adjustment, but these positions are not clearly indicated in the TD-01, Attachment 0002 or TD-06. Can the government provide more detailed requirement information in TD-01, Attachment 0002, or in TD-06 that will assist the contractor to understand where the Foreman positions outlined in the CBA's will reside in the labor force and under which CLINs?

Both CBA's indicate Foreman positions. However, at this time there is no requirement for a foreman position, but this does not prevent the offerors from proposing a foreman position if it aligns with their staffing solution.

Note: All lead position tasks are accurately identified in TD-01.

TD-01, Workload Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix Attachment 0008, CBA

Attachment TD-01 indicates Lead positions at Fort Lee;

however, the CBA for Fort Lee does not outline any premium pay adjustments for Leads at Fort Lee. Can the government clarify if there is an updated CBA which may include premium pay increases for Leads or if there is no premium pay requirements for Leads at Fort Lee?

The Government has provided the current CBAs incorporated into the current contract (the Fort Lee CBA is not prescriptive with regards to premium pay requirements for Lead positions). Offerors are required to propose the appropriate staffing/labor mix to perform the workload identified in TD-01, the PWS, and the contract by utilizing the appropriate documents.

TD-01, Workload Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix

The positions listed below, do not equate to full FTE's (1864) when calculated using the information provided on TD-01. Can the government address if these positions represent part time personnel or can the government adjust TD-01 to ensure hours calculate to full time equivalent positions for each labor category.

JBLE - Maintenance - Motor Vehicle Mechanic - FTE calculation = 6.9 JBLE - Maintenance - Electronics Maintenance Tech I - FTE calculation = 2.27 Fort Lee - Maintenance - Heavy Equipment Mechanic - FTE calculation = 1.93 Fort Lee - Maintenance - Motor Vehicle Mechanic - FTE calculation = 0.91 Fort lee - Maintenance - Electronic Tech, Maint II - FTE calculation = 0.98 Fort lee - Maintenance - Electronic Tech, Maint I - FTE calculation = 0.63 Fort Lee - Maintenance - Repairer Small Arms - FTE calculation = 1 28

Not all positions are required to be dedicated to one FTE. Some positions maybe dual-hatted.

TD-01, Workload Attachment 0002, Staffing and Labor Mix

On TD-01, Supply Tab, CLIN 3BA, Supply Support-Stock Readiness, the government input 1865 hours versus 1864, which represents one FTE throughout the exhibit. Can the government confirm that the 1865 hours is in error and should be recorded as 1864. If so, please provide an updated TD-01 reflecting the corrected hours.

The Government has updated TD-01 to reflect 1,864 hours per FTE.

TD-04, Hours of Operation TD-04 shows a compressed "regular day off" schedule for Fort Lee, in which alternating Friday's are non-work days. Is this the contractor's schedule, as well?

No, this is not the contractor's schedule. The Gov't does not dictate the contractor's schedule. The Government's expectation is the contractor's work schedule should be based on a forty (40) hour schedule or as other established mission hours may dictate. The site will be minimally staffed by Government personnel.

TD-06, Key and Specified Non-Key Positions

TD-06 indicates, under ESH Technician, that the Government requires an FTE Onsite at LRC Lee and an FTE Onsite at LRC JBLE. Can one of these FTE’s be the ESH Manager at one location and the Technician at the other location, or does the government require two Technicians, as well as the Manager?

The Government has updated TD-01 to reflect the requirement for Environmental Safety and Health. The Government has updated TD-06 Safety Coordinator to FLC2. Safety Coordinator may be an additional requirement for the Environmental Safety Health (ESH) Clerk at JBLE.

TD-06, Key and Specified Non-Key Positions

TD-06 indicates, under Quality System Analyst, that the Government requires an FTE Onsite at LRC Lee and an FTE Onsite at LRC JBLE. Can one of these FTE’s be the Quality Manager at one location and the Analyst at the other location, or does the government require two Analysts, as well as the Manager?

The Gov't has indicated Quality System Analyst – Specified Non-Key Position requirement for FTE Onsite at LRC Lee and an FTE Onsite at LRC JBLE. The Gov't also requires a Quality Manager per TD-06 Key & Specified Non-Key Positions.

L.5.2.1.1 Staffing and Management Plan (SMP) L.5.2.1.1 (a) (3) page limit 6

Staffing and Management Plan for any EAGLE opportunity requires the same elements to be addressed. From an SMP standpoint size of the opportunity should not be the driving factor for page limitations. Since the approach to staffing and managing EAGLE opportunities is relatively the same would the government consider allowing a 9 page submission vice 6 pages as it has on most other opportunities.

The page limit for the SMP will remain at six pages. This RFP has less requirements than other EAGLE task order competitions with higher page counts. For example, Offerors are not required to address a Surge Capability Requirement as was required in the Fort Hood EAGLE competition.

81 JBLE Site Visit Will there be a change in proposal evaluations in future EAGLE solicitations? We can only answer questions related to the JBLE/Ft. Lee site visit.

82 Site Visit 1-on-1

RFP M.5.2.8(c) relevancy of contract, how many functional areas need to be met to qualify and how does this affect the

AADV?

Section M, Paragraph M.5.2.8 states in order to determine if a reference is similar in scope to the FLVA-JBLE Fort Story Task Order, the reference must have demonstrated similar experience to the FLVA, JBLE, Fort Story PWS Attachment 0001, in at least one of the following functional areas: Maintenance, Supply, Transportation. In order to determine if a reference is similar in magnitude and complexity, the Annual Average Dollar Value must meet or exceed the minimal level of relevant experience listed in Section M, Paragraph M.5.2.8 ( c )(2) for each functional area: Maintenance, Supply, Transportation. If a contract reference has demonstrated experience in more than one functional area, the minimal level of relevant experience is the sum of the amounts listed in Section M, Paragraph M.5.2.8 ( c) (2) for each respective functional area.

83 Site Visit 1-on-1 How does transportation get determined relevant for PP reference?

In accordance with Section M, paragraph M.5.2.8 ( c ) In order to determine if a reference is relevant, the reference must meet scope, magnitude, and complexity requirements defined in M.5.2.8

RFP, Sec L, page 50, para L.5.1.9.1(a)

Reference to DoD Manual 4145.26-M dtd 13 Mar 08. There is a version DoD Manual 4145.26 (no "M") dtd 13 Mar 08 incorporating change 2 dtd 31 Aug 18 . Which version does the Government want referenced in this proposal?

Offerors should reference DoD Manual 4145.26 (no "M") dated 13 March 2008 incorporating change 2 dated 31 August 2018. Sections L and M have been updated to DoD Manual 4145.26 dated 13 March 2008 incorporating change 2 dated 31 August 2018.

RFP, Sec L, page 49, para L.5.1.6 Business Systems Information

In previous task orders, documentation for both the Accounting System and the Business System were required. RFP only requests documentation for the Accounting System. Has the requirement to provide current Gov't approval status of Business Systems (i.e. billing, estimating, budget and financial control, purchasing and QA) been removed? The RFP has been updated by adding Section L, Paragraph L.5.1.6.2