Attachment_0011_-__Questions__Answers_13Feb2018.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 113 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Security Support Services (SSS)
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J-17-R-0111
About this file
Attachment 0011 Q&A
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 65 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q&A 1 dated 12April2017
| Draft PWS Q&A 12April2017 | |||
| Question # | Reference/Page # | Question | USG Response |
| 1 | 3.4 Instructor Qualifications, Page 19 | Recommend adding tactical experience (minimum of 3 years)serving as a armed contractor or combat arms MOS to the instructor qualifications | PWS Section 3.4 remains unchanged at this time. |
| 2 | 2.6.1 PSD Shift Leader, Page 14 | recommend changing from E8 to E7 | See revised PWS Section 2.6.1. |
| 3 | None | Recommend incorporating explosive detection (at least) or dual purpose explosive detecction and patrol canine/handler teams in both the static and mobile services. Include the support staff (trainer, kennel master, vetrinarian etc…) as part of this solicitaion | These services will not be added to the SSS acquistion. |
| 4 | none | Recommend the government include in the final solicitation a separate exhibit or attachment detailing the requirements for weapons qualifications and training by weapon type including non-NATO weapons for the LNs | See Attachment 0004 - Private Security Company Weapons Qualifications Standards |
| 5 | 2.4.2.1 Guard Shift Leader U.S. Expat, Page 10 | PWS Position qualifications for this position do not include the requirement for a US Secret security clearance whereas ALL other positions requiring US Expats do include a requirement for a US Secret security clearance. Recommend including the requirement for a US secret clearance for this position | See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.1. |
| 6 | 4.2.1 Business Licenses, Page 25 | recommend the government include wording to support the deployment/employment of armed contractor personnel in countries that may not yet have reformed governments or allow the contractors to secure the licenses in a timely manner. We understand the requirements to be licensed in countries like Iraq and Afghanistan where contractors have been operating for over 15 years and the governments have been established, but the government should recognize and allow for the fact that this licensing may not be immediately available upon (much less prior to) the contractors entering a conflict/post-conflict country and their being a government in place to issue valid licenses. Requiring licenses with proposals works for established countries with enough leadway - requiring contractors to be licensed in all the countries on the CENTCOM AOR or in a post conflict country that may not have a government in order to submit a compliant proposal | The Host Nation Business Licenses will be determined at the Task Order Level. See revised PWS Section 4.2.1. |
| 7 | 2.3.2 SECURITY RECONNAISSANCE TEAMS (SRT) | "All team members will have advanced tactical training and the ability to operate all team equipment, including any team weapon." |
| Question: Can the Government provide additional information on what it considers “advanced tactical training” so bidders are operating from a common understanding regarding this term and its requirements? | See revised PWS Section 2.3.2 | ||
| 8 | 2.3.2 SECURITY RECONNAISSANCE TEAMS (SRT) | "The SRT must include team members with the following knowledge, skills and attributes: |
Advanced combat trauma first aid. Two team members will have certification as EMT/Combat Lifesaver. All team members will have training to stabilize trauma injuries.
| Questions: The government lists this requirement for SRTs but not for other tasks (such as Protective Services Teams, Security Escort Teams, or Convoy Escort Teams). Will these teams also be required to include certified EMT/Combat Lifesaver personnel? If not, how will emergency medical treatment be provided? | See revised PWS Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3. | ||
| 9 | 2.4.2.1 Guard Shift Leader U.S. Expat | "• Must possess a Military background of not less than ten (10) years or have equivalent training. |
• Must have reached the grade of E-7 or greater and successfully served in a supervisory role for at least one year at the platoon level or equivalent, verified by military transcripts and evaluations."
| Question: This does not list specific military occupational specialties (such as those listed under 2.4.2.3, Internal Roving Security Guard). It is the Government’s intent that the Guard Shift Lead not have a combat arms background? | See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.1. | ||
| 10 | 2.4.2.2 Internal Roving Security Guard Team Leader | "Must possess a Military background, have reached the grade of E-6 (NATO Code OR-6) or equivalent leadership experience in private security or civilian police and successfully served in a supervisory role for at least one year, verified by military transcripts and evaluations." |
| Question: This does not list specific military occupational specialties (such as those listed under 2.4.2.3, Internal Roving Security Guard). Is it the Government’s intent that the Internal Roving Security Guard Team Leader not have a combat arms background? | See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.2. | ||
| 11 | 2.4.2.4 Internal Roving Security Guard (OCN/LN) | "Four years’ experience in Military Occupational Specialty or Armed Force Specialty Codes designated as combat arms, Military Police, or Special Operations Forces." |
Question: Can the Government clarify how bidders are to confirm their OCN and LN roving security guards meet the requirement for four years’ experience? Can the Government also clarify if police, paramilitary, or previous prior security company experience is considered valid for this position? It is the Offeror's responsibility to provide OCN and LN roving security guards with the required expierence/training.
See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.4.
12 2.4.2.5 FIXED GUARD SHIFT LEADER FVEY/NATO "Prior experience as officer, non-commissioned officer or team leader in armed forces, police, or private security company in a contingency area."
| Question: Can the Government clarify the years of experience required for this position as well as the acceptable military occupational specialties? | See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.5. | ||
| 13 | 2.6.1 PSD SHIFT LEADER | "• Prior experience as officer, warrant officer or senior non-commissioned officer (E8 [NATO Code OR-8] or higher) or team leader in armed forces, police, or private security company in a contingency area. Must possess a Military background of not less than ten (10) years or have equivalent training." |
| Question: Section 2.6.2 PSD Team Leader lists specific military occupation specialties required for the Team Leader position. These are not listed for the PSD Shift Leader position. Is it the Government’s intent to not require this standard for the Shift Leader? | See revised PWS Section 2.6.1. | ||
| 14 | 2.7.2 SRT GUARD MEDIC, and 2.3.2 SECURITY RECONNAISSANCE TEAMS (SRT) | "2.7.2: Four years’ experience in Military Occupational Specialty or Armed Force Specialty Codes designated a combat medic or equivalent civilian certification. |
2.3.2: Advanced combat trauma first aid. Two team members will have certification as EMT/Combat Lifesaver. All team members will have training to stabilize trauma injuries."
Question: The Government provides two different standards for SRT medical qualifications. Can the Government please clarify which standard will be applied?
| Both sets of standards in PWS Sections 2.7.2 and 2.3.2 are required. | ||
| 15 | 2.4.2.6 FIXED GUARD SHIFT LEADER OCN/LN | "Prior experience as officer, warrant officer or non-commissioned officer or team leader in armed forces, police, or private security company in a contingency area. " |
| Question: Can the Government clarify the years of experience required for this position as well as the acceptable military occupational specialties? | See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.6. | ||
| 16 | 2.4.2.3 Internal Roving Security Guard (USEXPAT) and 2.4.2.7 FIXED GUARD U.S. EXPAT | "2.4.2.3: Four years’ experience in Military Occupational Specialty or Armed Force Specialty Codes designated as combat arms, Military Police, Special Operations Forces, or Civilian Police. |
2.4.2.7: Six years’ experience in Military Occupational Specialty or Armed Force Specialty Codes designated as combat arms, Military Police, or Special Operations Forces."
Question: Did the Government intend to set a higher experience bar for Fixed Guard USEXPATs versus Internal Roving Security Guard USEXPATs?
| See revised PWS Sections 2.4.2.3 and 2.4.2.7. | ||
| 17 | 2.4.2.9 FIXED/MOBILE GUARD Other Country Nationals (OCNs) and 2.4.2.10 FIXED/MOBILE GUARD Local National (LNs) | "2.4.2.9: Limited working proficiencies speaking, listen and reading in English language. |
2.4.2.10: Shall be a citizen of the duty location. Memorized proficiency speaking, listen, reading in English language."
Question: Is it the Government’s intent to set no prior experience standards for the OCN and LN Fixed/Mobile Guard positions?
| See revised PWS Sections 2.4.2.9 and 2.4.2.10. | |
| 18 | 2.4.2.5 FIXED GUARD SHIFT LEADER FVEY/NATO |
2.4.2.8 FIXED/MOBILE GUARD FVEY/NATO
2.4.2.9 FIXED/MOBILE GUARD Other Country Nationals (OCNs) "2.4.2.5: Prior experience as officer, non-commissioned officer or team leader in armed forces, police, or private security company in a contingency area.
2.4.2.8: FIXED/MOBILE GUARD FVEY/NATO: All guards shall possess the following qualifications:
• Shall be a citizen of NATO member state, Australia, or New Zealand.
• Limited working proficiencies speaking, listen and reading in English language.
2.4.2.9: FIXED/MOBILE GUARD Other Country Nationals (OCNs): All Guards shall possess the following qualifications:
• Limited working proficiencies speaking, listen and reading in English language."
Question: Is it the Government’s intent not to specify minimum experience for these positions?
| See revised PWS Sections 2.4.2.5, 2.4.2.8, and 2.4.2.9. | |||
| 19 | NA | What life support, if any, will the military and USG be providing in support of the Contractor work force? | Life support will be defined at the Task Order Level if needed. |
| 20 | NA | The CENTCOM AOR is encompassing of many countries. The ability to acquire licenses in some of these countries may prove to be extremely difficult if not impossible (i.e. Iran). |
| Of those countries within the CENTCOM AOR, will the Government consider specifying if there are countries where task orders will be non-existent? | Host Nation Business Licenses will be determined at the task order level. | ||
| 21 | PWS 2.3.3, Page 8 | Although the Government references an Operations Center in the PWS, there are no supporting positions specified within the PWS. |
| Will the Government please consider adding in labor positions such as Intelligence Analyst, Operations Specialist, Operations Managers, etc. to assist in providing the necessary support? | The positions needed are included in the PWS. | |||
| 22 | NA | Will any mobile security personnel be required to be cleared U.S. Expats? | See revised PWS. | |
| 23 | PWS 2.4.2.7, Page 12 | Will the Government consider requiring four years of experience for the Fixed Guard U.S. Expat position? | See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.7. | |
| 24 | PWS 2.4.2.7, Page 12 | Will the Government consider modifying the Fixed Guard U.S. Expat requirement to allow for civilian police experience as qualifying criteria? | See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.7. | |
| 25 | PWS 8.2.2, Page 36 | Will the Government please clarify the type of LAV requested? (i.e. SUV, Bus, or Sedan)? | The type of vehicle will be determined at the Task Order Level. See revised PWS Section 8.2.2. | |
| 26 | NA | Although static security personnel often have multiple layers of added security (i.e. fall back positions, military presence, quick reaction force, etc.), this is not the case with mobile security personnel. |
Due to the increased risk of conducting mobile security, versus static security coupled with the inherent quality of personnel associated with a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable release, will the Government consider releasing Mobile Security components as Best Value? The Government may utilize the Best Value Tradeoff Source Selection Processes for the base contract award(s). The utilization of Best Value Tradeoff or LPTA will be determined at the Task Order level, based on complexity and scope of the Task Order requirements.
Q&A 2 dated 21September2017
| Draft PWS Q&A 21September2017 | |||
| Question # | Reference/Page # | Question | USG Response |
| 1 | PWS/ Page 1 and Page 22 | Page 1 references "armed/unarmed security operations" and Page 22 states "all personnel who fall under the scope of this contract are required to be armed". Please clarify which positions, if any, are unarmed. | See revised PWS Section 3.1. |
| 2 | PWS/Page 22 | Please clarify if the firearm training device that can be used for semi-annual/sustainment training as approved by the KO and as resources allow will be provided as GFE | GFE/GFP will be defined at the task order level. The EST 2000 is the only recognized system of record by the U.S. Army, therefore, the contracing officer does not have the authority to grant equivalent recognition to any other specific simulation device. |
| 3 | PWS/Page 22 | Section 3.2 requires that initial weapons qualification be completed prior to deployment to a specific task order. Are we correct in assuming that personnel do not have to qualify initially with their assigned weapons? If not, and weapons are GFE, how can contractors qualify with their assigned weapons before arriving at the site? | The individual does not need to qualify with the specific induvial weapons (i.e., serial number) but rather with the type of weapon and configuration they will carry (e.g., M-4 with CCO). |
| 4 | PWS/Pages 12,13 and 14 | Section 2.4.2.1 Identifies the requirements for the "Guard Shift Leader U.S. Expat" while sections 2.4.2.5 and 6 identify "FIXED Guard Shift Leader" (FVEY/NATO) and OCN/LN respectively. Are these positions meant to be interchangeable by task order requirements (if so, should the positions be named the same "Fixed Guard Shift Leader") or does the Government envision the "Fixed Guard Shift Leaders" reporting to the "Guard Shift Leader U.S. Expat"? | See revised PWS Sections 2.4.2.5 and 2.4.2.6. |
| 5 | PWS/Pages 12,13 and 15 | While there are many positions identified as "Fixed/Mobile Guard" FVEY/NATO, OCN, and LN, there is no position identified as a Fixed/Mobile Guard U.S. Expat, only "Fixed Guard". Is this an oversight or does the government not require mobile guards U.S. Expats? | It is ultimately at the contractor's discreation on how they choose to staff the positions, but note that NATO/FVEY countries include U.S. Expats. There is no change in the PWS. |
| 6 | PWS/Page 15 | 2.4.2.12 does not identify the nationality requirements for the medics. Please provide. | The position requirements are listed at PWS 2.4.2.12, a specific nationality is not required. |
| 7 | PWS/Pages 15, 18 and 19 | as the only medic / medical support position identified in the scope are "mobile" and "protective" positions, are we correct in assuming that all medical support for the static/fixed security personnel are government furnished? | Both the PSD and SRT have a medic as a part of their team. Therefore, the medic at PWS Section 2.4.2.12 is the medic that will support static/fixed guards. |
| 8 | PWS/page 15, 18 and 19 | Section 2.4.2.12, please provide additional detail on what the government will accept as "equivalent civilian certification" for a combat medic. As this position does not have a nationality requirement, please confirm that the civilian certification is available and applicable for NATO/FVEY and OCN/LN personnel | The intent is that medical personnel have certified training equivalent to US Army Combat Life Saver. |
| 9 | PWS/Multiple Pages, multiple sections | Section 2.4.2.1Please provide additional clarification on what "equivalent training" the government considers equal to 10 years of military experience and the minimum rank/grade of E-7 | See revised PWS. |
| 10 | PWS/Page 15 | Sections 2.4.2.10 and 11 - please confirm what proof the government will accept for years of military experience as well as type of discharge for the LN personnel. | It is at the Contractor's discretion to decide what they think would be sufficient to show proof of experience/discharge. |
| 11 | PWS/page 15, 18 and 19 | Would the government consider adding a "senior medic U.S. Expat" position in order to facilitate control and standardization of the medics as well as manage logistics/supplies etc.… | No. However, inclusion of such as position to provide necessary control and coordination of the vendor’s internal organizational structure is at the discretion of the contractor. |
| 12 | PWS/Pages 15 and 16 | Sections 2.5 and 2.5.1 - as the Operations Cell and the Coordination Cell scope requirements are significantly different from those of the static and mobile security scopes, will the government provide additional clarity and detail on the requirements for the positions necessary to support and execute this work? Are we correct in assuming that these are two separate cells and not necessarily located on the same FOB/location? | See revised PWS Sections 2.5 and 2.5.1. |
| 13 | PWS/Page 5 | Section 2.1.3.1 Please confirm if the training mentioned in this section is contractor or Government provided. Also, please confirm the type of "recovery operations" (vehicle, personnel etc.…) training . | All training requirements are the responsibility of the contractor, unless otherwise specified. |
| 14 | PWS/Pages 9, 15 and 16 | Please clarify and deconflict the composition and scopes of the multiple operations and coordinations centers and cells outlined in the scope. Is the Private Security Operations Center described on Page 9 the same as the Operation Center delineated in Section 2.5? What are the expected types of positions the government deems necessary to support and execute the work of these Operations/Coordinations Centers/Cells (intel, IT, Communications etc...) and will you provide additional positions as well as minimum requirements/qualifications/types of experience for the positions supporting these centers/cells ? | Please see revised PWS Section 2.5. The specific Operation Center requirements will be determined at Task Order level. |
| 15 | PWS 3.2 / Page 22 | Will ranges, ammo, firearms training devices (e.g. EST-2000) be CFE or GFE? | GFE will be determined at the Task Order level. |
| 16 | PWS 2.3.2 / Page 8 | Will LN's require weapons' training for all Task Order organic weapon systems? | Yes |
| 17 | PWS 6.2.2 / Page 35 | Since all U.S. contractor personnel must transit through CRC, can weapons' qualifications be conducted at Ft. Bliss or will that need to be completed prior to arrival at Ft. Bliss? | Weapons' qualifications may be conducted at Ft. Bliss on an as available basis, at the contractor's risk. If weapons qualifications are conducted prior to arrival at Ft. Bliss, it is required that the qualification on all weapon types and configuration (e.g., M-4 w CCO) that will be assisnged to the individual when in theater. |
| 18 | PWS 6.2.2 / Page 35 | If weapon qualification must occur prior to arriving at Ft. Bliss, what weapon systems are required to be fired? | If weapons' qualifications are conducted prior to arrival at Ft. Bliss they are required to complete the qualification on all weapon types and configuration (e.g., M-4 w CCO) that will be assigned to the individual when in theater. |
| 19 | PWS 6.2.2 / Page 35 | Will the government provide a list of POI's covered during CRC? | An explanation of CRC can be found at the following link: https://www.bliss.army.mil/crc/documents/L104%20-%20CRC%20Deployment%20Guidance_13%20July%202014.pdf |
| 20 | PWS Attachment 004 Annex_Private_Security_Company_Weapons_Qualifications_Standards | Is there a limit to the number of times an individual can attempt to successfully qualify with a particular weapon system? | There is no limit to number of attempts. The requirement is that the contractor must certify that the individual is qualified. If weapons qualification is done at CRC, however, Fort Bliss may have a limitation on number of attempts. |
| 21 | PWS Part 3 / Page 22 | Are the any other specific minimum qualifications (i.e. years of experience, additional certifications, etc…) for instructors other than those listed for firearms and Master Driver? If so, please provide. | There are no specific minimum qualifications for instructors other than those listed in PWS Section 2.4.1. and PWS Part 3 Training Requirements. |
| 22 | PWS Part 3 / Page 22 | Will the contractor be required to develop curriculum to satisfy the PWS for any courses not covered by CBT or provided at CRC? | Yes. Unless otherwise provided for, the contractor will develop its own POI that will meet the training outcome requirements of the PWS. |
| 23 | PWS 3.6.3 / Page 23 | What the minimum specifications for a driving track to conduct the driving training outlined in 3.6.3? | The training process is at the contractor's discreation. The contractor may develop training that meets the required outcome. |
| 24 | none | Does the government intend to inspect contractor training facilities (CONUS and OCONUS, if required) and if so, will the government provide an inspection/specifications' checklist? | At this time the Government does not intend to inspect contractor training facilities. |
| 25 | none | Can the contractor train FVEY and OCN personnel at the task order location, at risk, or will they need to be trained elsewhere and then deployed to the TO POP? | The contractor may train FVEY and OCN personnel at the task order location at their own risk. |
| 26 | none | Is there a minimum # of hours required to conduct pre-deployment training courses? If so, what is the breakdown between classroom and practical application. | Unless otherwise provided for, the contractor may develop its own POI that meets the training outcome requirements of this PWS. |
| 27 | PWS 2.1.3 / Page 4 | Please confirm that these are internal roving patrols. Will the government require roving guards to go further than 1 mile from the facility perimeter? | The USG confirms that the PWS Section 2.1.3 Roving Patrols are internal. It is not intended for them to operate outside of the perimeter. |
| 28 | PWS 2.1.3.1 / Page 4 | Will the government provide drivers training, crew served weapons employment training, self-defense, escalation of force and rules of force training? If so, are we correct in assuming it will be conducted at the worksite? If not, where? | Unless otherwise provided for, the contractor may develop its own POI that meets the training outcome requirements of this PWS. |
| 29 | PWS 2.3.2 / Page 8 | Will the government provide clarificationas to what type of "advanced tactical training" these personnel are supposed to receive and who is to provide it? If the contractor is to provide, can the government supply additional information concerning the minimum requirements and qualifications of the tactical instructor(s)? | Advanced Tactical Training required is listed in PWS Section 2.3.2 . |
| 30 | PWS/Multiple Pages, multiple sections | What will the government accept as proof of FVEY, OCN's and LN's military / police experience? | The Offeror is required to provide personnel that meet the requirements of the PWS. Documentation included is at the Offeror's discretion. |
| 31 | PWS 2.7.2 / Page 17 | Will the government provide advanced medicine and trauma care for contractors on the contract? | The USG will provide medical care IAW Deviation 2015-O0009 - Contractor Personnel Performing in the United States Central Command Theater of Operations as well as AFARS 5152.225-5902 - Fitness for Duty and Medical/Dental Care Limitations. Anything beyond what is stated in the references above are provided for by the contractor. |
| 32 | PWS 3.1 / Page 22 | Will the government provide the specific weapon systems that each contractor must be able to qualify with? | Specific weapons will be listed in Task Order. Currently, CENTCOM specifies U.S. Government approved individual weapons and ammunition. M-16/M-4 or AK-47 type weapons (not to exceed 7.62mm) and M-9 or equivalent (not to exceed .45 cal.) are the standard approved weapons and ammunition for contract security. U. S. Government ball ammunition is the standard approved ammunition. |
| 33 | PWS 3.6.3 / Pages 23-24 | Will the contractor be responsible for hiring a master driver to conduct driver training for contractors? If the Master Driver is a contractor position, will the contractor master driver be authorized to issue licenses on military tactical vehicles (or is this a government responsibility)? | It is the responsibility of the contractor to arrange for training through a Master Driver. |
| 34 | PWS 6.2 / Page 35 | Does the government have a standard number of days in which the task order would be fully operational? | Depending on the scope and the complexity of the Task Order fully operational status would be required at either 90 days or 120 days. The amount will be decided at the task order level. |
| 35 | PWS 2.4.2.7 / Page 14 | Text bullet references Four years' Military experience required, with a substitution for two years "of the total six years' experience" . Will the Government please confirm that the substitution is for a total of four years' experience? | See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.7. |
| 36 | PWS 2.4 / Pages 10 - 21 | Only one of the 25 PSC Personnel positions in the PWS (2.4.2.1 Guard Shift Leader U.S. Expat.) is referenced as being "considered key personnel". Are any of the other listed positions considered by the Government to be key personnel? | See revised PWS. |
| 37 | Attachment 0005 and PWS 2.1.4, 2.4 / Pages 10 - 21 | The Government has issued as Attachment 0005 a description of ILR Language Skill Level Descriptions. However, a number of positions that are classified as USEXPAT require only 2 or 2+ skill levels, which corresponds to Limited Working Proficiency or Plus, and described as "Discourse is often incohesive". Will the Government confirm that this is the correct language skill level required for these positions? | The USG confirms that 2 or 2+ skill level is a minimum requirement. |
| 38 | PWS 2.3.3, 2.5 / Page 9, 15 | What are the differences between the Private Security Operations Center referenced in PWS 2.3.3 and the Operations Center described in PWS 2.5? | See revised PWS. |
| 39 | PWS 2.5.1 / Page 16 | Is the Coordination Cell located in the Private Security Contract Operations Center, Operations Center or another Government facility? | The specific requirements for a operations cell will be determined at the Task Order level. |
| 40 | PWS 2.4.2.1 2.9, 2.8, /Page 12 and 20 | What are the specific roles and responsibilites for the Guard Site Manager and Guard Site Assistant Manager, particularly with respect to the reporting relationship to the Guard Shift Leader (PWS 2.4.2.1) and communications with the COR? | See revised PWS Sections 2.4.2.1, 2.8, and 2.9. |
| 41 | General | Does the Government anticipate funding any PMO positions required for SSS? | The positions required are included in the PWS. |
| 42 | Draft PWS April 12 Response Q&A - Question 26 | The Government indicated that it may use Best Value source selection for the base contract award. This evaluation could be enhanced with the release of task orders concurrent with the base IDIQ. Will the Government consider releasing one or more task orders with the base IDIQ RFP package? | Task Orders will not be released with the base IDIQ RFP package. |
| 43 | 4.8.3 / page 31 | The PWS calls for weapons to be maintained in "proper working order", but does not allow for an armorer to be included with the deployed teams. Will armorer be included in the task orders either in the FOB or in the AOR? | It is the contractor's discretion on how to meet the requirement for weapons to be maintained in proper working order. |
| 44 | 2.4 / page 10-15 | The PWS does not allow for any forward deployed Logistical personnel to handle property accountability, shipping, inventory maintenance and other logistical functions that are critical to mission success. Will the larger Task Orders include Logistics Personnel in the AOR or as part of the larger teams? | The positions required are included in the PWS. Although, it is at the contractor's discretion on how they plan to prospose to accomplish requirements of the PWS. |
| 45 | 1.0 / page 3 | The PWS refers us to the Unified Command Plan (UCP) for specific AOR details. Can we get a copy of the current UCP? | See revised PWS Section 1.0. |
| 46 | 2.1 / page 5 | The PWS requires guards to possess the ability to operate metal detectors (i.e., Rapid Scan). Can we perform the certification in theater, with on-site equipment, or must it be accomplished before deployment? Will the Government specify the equipment we are required to become certified on? | Certification can be performed in theater. Whether the equipment will be vendor provided or GFE will be identified at the task order level. |
| 47 | 2.1 / page 5 | Many of the documents specified in the PWS are not publically available. Can we get digital copies of all U.S. Military PAMs, Regulations, and other documents, referenced in the PWS? | All documents that are unclassified and can be released for public viewing listed in Part 4 are available on-line. |
| 48 | 2.1.3 / page 5 | Given that roving patrols outside of the perimeter, can provide critical early warning of threats, is there any authority given to security provider to operate outside of the designated perimeter of the installation the Contractor is securing? | Determined at the Task Order level. |
| 49 | 2.1 / page 5 | Can the Government provide a list of all technology currently installed and in use on perimeters at installations to allow offerors to develop a good pre-deployment training plan and ensure a level playing field for all bidders? | The Government will not provide this information. |
| 50 | 2.1.3.1 / page 5 | Must all training requirements be accomplished within 10 days of arrival at final duty location? | See revised PWS Section 2.2. |
| 51 | 2.1.4 / page 6 | Is English proficiency certification required for employees for whom English is their primary language? Must everybody have a proficiency certification or only employees for whom English is not their primary language? | A minimum English proficieny level 2/2+ is required for all employees, unless stated otherwise. |
| 52 | 2.1.4 / page 6 | Does a US primary HS equivalent diploma / certificate satisfy English proficiency requirement? What about prior services in the U.S. armed forces? | The personnel need to be able to demonstrate English proficiency IAW with the PWS. Documentation is not required. |
| 53 | 2.2.2 / page 6 | Is there a minimum number of mobile guards per two armed vehicle SETs? | Yes, IAW PWS Section 2.2.2 |
| 54 | 2.2.2 / page 6 | Can the Medic and / or driver count as mobile guards? | No. The Medic and the Driver have different duties and cannot be interchanged. |
| 55 | 2.3.2 / page 7 | For the SRT, can we have an LNO co-located with the supported Civil Affairs unit or is the LNO's responsibility on a project-by-project basis? Can the Government more clearly define all SRT team member responsibilities? | The Government will not provide this information. SRT responsibilities required are provided in the PWS. |
| 56 | 2.3.2 / page 9 | Regarding liaison with local authorities, is Contractor responsible for relationship building or only supporting the Civil Affairs? | The Government will not provide this information. |
| 57 | 2.3.3 / page 9 | Does Private Security Contract Operations Center have to be at duty location or can it be positioned geographically to support multiple duty locations, as long as there are command & control nodes at each location? Does every duty location require a Private Security Contract Operations Center? Can it be located outside the base controlling multiple locations? | See revised PWS. The specific requirements for a Operations Center will be determined at a task order level. |
| 58 | 2.4.1 / page 10 | PWS requires an Armed PSC to be able to temporarily perform minimum required duties in the event eyeglasses are broken or displaced by emergency actitvity. What is the specific un-aided eye-sight requirement for shooting? In most senarios, 20/20 - 20/70 would be the minimum. Is there a minimum standard? | There is no minimum standard required. Demonstrated proficiency is the requirement. |
| 59 | 2.4.2.1 / page 12 | PWS requires Guard Shift Leader U.S. Expat to work in the Ops Center watch floor. Does this refer to the Contractor Ops Center or the U.S. Military Ops Center at the duty location? | It refers to any operations or command center as determined by the force protection officer at the task order level. |
| 60 | 2.4, Page 12-15 | Throughout the PWS, personnel with military background is required. We assume anybody with a US military background must have an Honorable Discharge Certificate and no discharge below Honorable would be acceptable. Is that true? | Yes, any individual with US military back ground must be Honorable Discharge and have a Honorable Discharge certificate. |
| 61 | 2.5.1 / page 16 | Regarding force protection and intelligence, will cleared Contractor personnel have access to classified reporting related to base security? | Release of classified information to any person, even “cleared” personnel, will require a “need to know” in addition to the appropriate clearance level. |
| 62 | 2.5.1 / page 16 | Will Contractor be required to get U.S. military approval for any / all movements outside of the secured area? | The contractor must comply with the appropriate force protection procedures. These will vary from location to location and will be specified in any orders relevant to the Task Order. |
| 63 | 2.5.1 / page 16 | Where will the Coordination Cell be located? With USG Operations Center or Contractor Operations Center? | The specific requirements for the Operations Center will be determined at the Task Order level. |
| 64 | 2.10 / page 21 | Is there any requirement for Interpreters to possess US Citizenship or to possess a security clearance? | The Interpreters do not have to possess US Citizenship or a security clearance. |
| 65 | 3.1 / page 22 | Can we get a copy of the referenced OPORD and FRAGOs? | All documents that are unclassified and can be released for public viewing listed in Part 4 are available on-line. |
| 66 | 3.2 page 22 and ANNEX -- PSC Weapons Qualification Standards | PWS states initial qualification will be performed via live fire. Does that mean that all subsequent qualification and sustainment training can be performed using non-live fire training and certification methods for duration of individual's participation on the contract? Also, the ANNEX says that "if conditions do not allow for live fire requalification, approved simulators may be used." Can simulators be used even if conditions do allow for live fire to provide the Government more options for qualification training? | Live fire re-qualification is the standard and shall be used if available. Simulators, if available, are recommended for sustainment training in-between semi-annual requalification. |
| 67 | 4.3 / page 28 | Must arming authorization be accomplished before proposal submission? Also,must BIOMETRIC Enrollment be done before proposal submission? | Arming authorization and Biometric enrollment will not be required to be complete prior to proposal submission. |
| 68 | 7.1 / page 37 | Will the Government provide the FAR and DFARS requirements specific to management of Government property? | Government Property Clauses are listed below: |
FAR 52.245-1
DFARS 252.211-7007
DFARS 252.245-7001
DFARS 252.245-7002
DFARS 252.245-7004
| 69 | 8.2 / page 38-39 | Will there be a fleet manager position for vehicle oversight, maintenance and monitoring of reporting requirements? | A Fleet Manager position is not a requirement, however, it is at the contractor's discretion to include this type of position. If a contractor included this position in their proposal justification shall be included in the narrative. |
| 70 | Attachment 0005 - Interagency Language Roundtable | The attachment provides detailed language skill level descriptions. Does the USG require a third party testing authority, or can the language skill assessments be self-performed? | The USG does not require a third party testing authority. It is at the contractors discretion on how the language proficiency will be met. |
| 71 | SSS PWS - Page 3, Para 1 | With the potential inclusion of additional AORs, does the USG intend for interested companies to submit a worldwide NTE labor rate, per category, or will the IDIQ NTE labor rates only cover CENTCOM? | The USG intends that the IDIQ NTE labor rates submitted with this proposal will only cover CENTCOM. When additional AORs have a requirement, pricing will be requested for those specific AORs. |
| 72 | SSS PWS - Training Requirements, Page 22, Section 3.1 | Does the USG intend for required training to be completed in the United States, prior to deployment, or will the USG allow a portion of the curriculum be instructed at the place of performance, prior to beginning work in that labor category? Are there any limitations? | Reference PWS Section 6.2.5 "The Contractor is responsible for providing all training as is detailed in the PWS for all personnel prior to the arrival at the in-country performance location. Training for sites that require any crew-served weapons qualification (familiarization training must be provided by the contractor prior to the arrival in theater) will take place once employees arrive at performance location." |
| 73 | SSS PWS - Page 12, Section 2.4.2.1 | The only key position identified is the Guard Shift Leader U.S. Expat. Does the USG intend to require a CONUS Program Management Office? At minimum, we recommend a Program Manager and Deputy Program Manager as Key Personnel, requiring 100% dedication to the SSS Program. | See revised PWS. |
| 74 | SSS PWS - Page 15, Sections 2.4.2.10 and 2.4.2.11 | For LN positions, how does the Government intend to determine pricing methods, per country? We recommend not including LN NTE rates at the IDIQ level, due to the high level of variability between local markets. | See Attachment 0002 - Section L- Additional Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors; Attachment 0003 - Section M - Additional Evaluation Factors for Award; and Attachment 0004 - Price Matrix. |
Q&A 3 dated 12December2017
| Draft PWS/Solicitation Q&A 12December2017 | |||
| Question # | Reference/Page # | Question | USG Response |
| 1 | Section L3 states the Introduction/Exec Summary is to not exceed 5 pages. Section L.4.4 states 2 pages | Please confirm the maximum length of the Introduction/Executive Summary | The maximum length of the Introduction/Executive Summary is 5 pages. See revised Section L.4.4. |
| 2 | Sections L4 and M4 "validation of compliance with ANSI/ASIS PSC.1-2012…" et al | Please confirm that the USG requires acceptable offerors to be "certified" IAW these national and international standards vice just validating that we comply with them. If acceptable offerors only have to validate that they comply with these standards, what documentation will the USG accept as proof/validation of this "compliance"? | Third party certification is not required by DoD and shall not be required in DoD contracts. However, offerors may provide certification information as evidence to support the system they propose. Consideration of such certifications will be considered as a factor in the evaluation of proposals for award of a covered contract for the provision of private security functions. Alternative evidence of compliance may be a record of audit under a previous government contract which states that the vendor was in compliance with ANSI/ASIS PSC.1 or ISO 18788. The offeror may also submit as evidence a plan for conformity assessment that includes independent auditing by subject matter experts and surveillance audits equivalent to the requirements in ANSI/ASIS PSC.2 and ANSI Accreditation Bureau (ANAB) Rule 40. Certification will be preferred over other forms of evidence. |
| 3 | Section L5.1.2 "model task order" | Is the government providing a model/sample task order for offerors to bid against with the final solicitation/RFP? If so, will the technical and price proposals for it be separate/additional volumes than the ones listed in this Section L and M? | The USG will not provide a model/sample task order for offerors to bid against with the final solicitation/RFP. |
| 4 | Sections L and M multiple references to "Host Country/Nation" and "Host Country/Nation Laws" | The government requires offerors to provide details in many volumes of their proposal that are dependent upon or in response to "host country laws" including mobilization/demobilization plans, recruitment and screening plans, supply chain management and transition plans for example and risk assessment matrices for many. As host country laws differ would the government consider providing a "sample" or "for response purposes only" country to use for the technical volume as you did for the price volume? | The USG will not provide a "sample" or "for response purposes only" country. |
| 5 | Section L.7 and Attachment 4 CLINs X008 and 009 | Would the government provide a CLIN for Host Nation Personnel mobilization and demobilization? If not, please provide the location where you would like for us to account for these costs. | The USG will not provide a CLIN for Host Nation Personnel mobilization and demobilization. The mobilization and demoblization expenses associated with Host Nation Personnel shall be put into the Firm Fixed Price Labor. |
| 6 | Section M.2.2 | Given the binary evaluation ratings, how will the Government assess the relevancy for contracts executed outside of the CENTCOM AOR? Will contracts executed CONUS be evaluated as "Not relevant"? Will contracts that do not required armed security be evaluated as "not relevant"? | IAW with the definition of relevant in section M.10.2.2, contracts can be the same, similar, or some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities. Therefore, if a contract has some similarities it will be considered relevant. |
| 7 | Section M.9.2.4.5 | This section states the USG will verify that the offeror has provided an affirmative statement that reflects full understanding of and compliance with host nation and country of origin recruitment and labor laws. Isn't this requirement/evaluation criteria better suited for the individual task orders where the offerors will have greater fidelity on not only their final selection of where they are recruiting OCN/TCN/NATO expats as well as the actual host nation? If the government requires this information as part of the IDIQ proposal, would the USG please remove this section from the page count as we will have to provide dozens of affirmative statements (number of "country of origins" x each CENTCOM AOR country)? | IAW PWS 1.0 Overview, "This Performance Work Statement is for the Security Support Services (SSS) throughout the CENTCOM AOR." An affirmative statement shall be made for countries with in the CENTCOM AOR in support of PWS 1.0. |
| 8 | Section L.6.3 | Please confirm that the USG requires our outline of how we intend to assign the effort of future task orders under this IDIQ as part of the Past Performance Volume and not the technical volume. | Section L.6.3, Section 3 - Subcontracts is a part of the past performance volume. |
| 9 | PWS multiple references and Attachment 8 | Please confirm that when the USG states that the language requirement for positions ("level X in English" ) they are for speaking only and that no position requires a "reading" proficiency. Please confirm that there are no requirements evaluation criteria for listening or reading. Please confirm that the requirements only pertain to English and that there are no requirements for any personnel to speak, read or be able to listen in the language of the host nation. | The USG confirms that the language requirement for positions are for speaking. In accordance with PWS 2.10, there is an interpreter position which shall be able to speak, read, or be able to listen to host country or other country national languages as determined at the task order level. |
| 10 | Section L.5.2.4.6 / M.9.2.4.7 | Please provide explanation whether this housing plan is country specific or AOR-wide. If country specific, please provide which nation this section should be based on. | See revised PWS Section 8.5. See revised Section L.5.2.4.6 and Section M.9.2.4.6. |
| 11 | PWS 2.2 / page 6 | Who is responsible for providing the training at the final duty station for the training outlined in this section? | All training is provided by the contractor, unless otherwise specified. |
| 12 | PWS Part 3 / page 26 & PWS 6.2.2 / page 39 | In the Q&A from 21 September 2017, the government stated information for CRC could be found via a provided link. The link did not outline the specific training courses provided at CRC. Would the government consider providing that list to offerors IOT ensure the training management plan covers all required training (CRC and any training not included in CRC) outlined in the PWS? | The USG will not provide a list of the required training. Information on training can be found in DFARS clause 252.225-7995 (Deviation 2017-O0004), as well as Attachment 0015 - Pre-Deployment Guide. |
| 13 | PWS 3.2 / page 26 | Will the government confirm the CCO is the "Close Combat Optic" and the model is the Aimpoint CompM2? | The CCO is not required in the PWS, Attachment 0007 - Annex Private Security Company Weapons Qualification Standards, or Chapter 8 of DA PAM 385-38. For the purpose of contractor standards and the Law Enforcement Qualification Standards, CCO or Close Combat Optic does not refer to a particular model of optic. Any non-magnified reflex sight with aiming dot not to exceed 4 MOA, is operable throught the environmental factors applicable to the task order, and will reliably hold zero will be acceptable. |
| 14 | PWS 3.2 / page 26 | The Q&A #32 from 21 September 2017 states the approved weapon systems are "…M9 or equivalent (NTE .45 cal). Will the government clarify what an equivalent manufacturer and model weapon is? | Any semi-automatic pistol in military use, using a magazine with at least seven rounds, in calibers or 9mm, 40 cal. or .45 cal., IAW arming authorization policy in effect for the task order. Examples could include (but are not limited to) the M9, M11 (Sig P228), M1911, M45, Glock 17, 19, or 22, and M17 (Sig P320). |
| 15 | PWS 6.2.2 / page 39 | Will the contractor be required to provide instructors for the CRC course at Ft. Bliss? | No, the Contractors will not be required to provide instructors for the CRC courses. |
| 16 | PWS 3.4 / page 27 | Will the government accept a DOS Basic Field Firearms Officer Course (BFFOC) certification as a qualifying firearms' instructor credential? | Yes. This meets the definition in paragraph 3.4 |
| 17 | Q&A 21 September 2017 #'s 22 and 26 | The government stated the contractor can create POIs to meet the training outcome requirements, |
A. Will the government require submission of the contractor developed POIs for approval prior to use?
B. Who retains ownership of the developed POIs?
| C. What is the security classification (CUI) of developed POI's, if any? | Any training materials developed by the contractor for the contractors use will be considered proprietary and will remain the property of the contractor. Such POIs will be unclassified. Any POIs developed by the contractor will meet the outcome required in the PWS for that training. | ||
| 18 | Attachment 0004 - Price Matrix, Assumptions Tab | 2) Pricing assumptions state fully operational status will be either 275 or 245 for the base year. The base year tab prices 365 days of labor for each labor category. Assumptions also define mobilization which does not include labor; however states "Contractors will only be able to bill the number of personnel required to perform services..." Is it to be assumed that all mobilization labor for each labor category is to billed in CLINS 0001-0005 and other labor required to mobilize in the mobilization CLIN? Or should mobilization labor for BOG personnel be priced in CLIN 0008? |
See revised Attachment 0004 - Price Matrix. Any costs associated with mobilization shall be billed to the mobilization CLINS.
| 19 | L.3 | The Table on page in L.3 states Volume I is titled "Proof of Facilities Clearance, Business Operations Licenses, Validation of compliance with ANSI/ASIS PSC.1- 2012, and Supplemental Documents" and page 5 is titled "Proof of Facilities Clearance, Validation of Compliance with ANSI/ASIS PCS.1-2012, and Supplemental Documents". Which title is correct? | See revised table in Section L.3. |
| 20 | L.3 | What format should we submit Volumes I-III? Is PDF acceptable? | It is at the offerors discretion on the format (word/pdf) of Volumes I-III. PDF is acceptable. |
| 21 | L.3 | Past Performance Questionnaires are listed in the exclusions. Are past performance questionnaires required for this bid? | See revised Section L.3. |
| 22 | L.5.1.3.1 | The link on page 7 does not work. Please fix. | See Section L.5.1.3.1. See Attachment 0017 - Annex A, ATP 5-19 Risk Management. |
| 23 | PWS Part 10 | The Deliverables lists states a Quality Control Plan (QCP) is due with the proposal. Is this correct? If so, where should it go? Does it count against the page count? | See revised PWS Section 5.3.1. |
| 24 | L.5.2.3 | Section L.5.2.3 requires the submission of program management resumes but nowhere else in the PWS tells the contractor who the government is defining as key personnel or part of the program management team. Please clarify, | Key Personnel are defined throughout the PWS. |
| 25 | PWS 2.4.2.7 / Page 14 | Can the Government clarify if the Fixed Guard U.S. Expat should be Fixed/Mobile Guard U.S. Expat to correspond with PWS 2.4.2.8 – Fixed/Mobile Guard FVEY/NATO and PWS 2.4.2.9 – Fixed/Mobile Guard OCNs? | See revised PWS Section 2.4.2.7. |
| 26 | PWS 2.4.2.12 / Page 15 | Can the Government provide the nationality of the Mobile Guard Medic? | The position requirements are listed at PWS 2.4.2.12, a specific nationality is not required. |
| 27 | PWS 1.0 / Page 3 | Can the Government provide the list of countries in the CENTCOM AOR they anticipate issuing task orders in the base year? | The USG will not provide a list of countries in the CENTCOM AOR they anticipate issuing task order for in the base year. |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.