Attachment_0008_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

1 | P a g e

ATTACHMENT 0010

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

RFP W52P1J-16-R-0139 - Passive RFID III

OFFEROR NAME and CAGE:

SECTION I – GENERAL GUIDANCE

Introduction: Under solicitation W52P1J-16-R-0139 - Passive RFID III, the Army Contracting Command at Rock Island, IL (ACC-RI) is obtaining past performance information. The completed PPQ serves as a source of information to evaluate the Offerors recent and relevant performance of the submitted project/contract reference (listed in Section IIB below) as it relates to the solicitation.

Instructions:

Offerors shall – o Complete Section IIA and IIB, then email entire PPQ to the intended PPQ Respondent.

o Instruct the PPQ Respondent to complete Section III.

Respondents to the PPQ shall – o Complete Section III entirely, to include comments (if any); and Section IV with contact information.

o Send the completed PPQ to the Government Contract Specialist, Tim Volkert at timothy.w.volkert.civ@mail.mil.

o Recommended format for email Subject: “Completed PPQ for W52P1J-16-R-0139, [Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-[contract reference number]”.

o Recommended PPQ electronic document filename: “[Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-PPQ-pRFID III -[contract reference number].doc” or “.docx” or “.pdf”.

o Send the completed PPQ to the Contract Specialist identified above. DO NOT send a copy of the completed PPQ to the Offeror.

In addition to the submitted PPQ email response, Respondents may receive follow-up phone calls for clarification purposes. This is a critical acquisition and as such comments are appreciated for all ratings as applicable.

RATING DESCRIPTION

Excellent The Offeror's past performance far exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits.

Good The Offeror’s past performance exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits.

Satisfactory The Offeror's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements.

Marginal The Offeror's past performance could have been improved. The Offeror required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

Unsatisfactory The Offeror's past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements.

mailto:timothy.w.volkert.civ@mail.mil

2 | P a g e

SECTION II (To be completed by the Offeror A. 1 - 6 and B. 1 - 9)

A. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

1. Name & Job Title:

2. Organization:

3. Address:

4. Phone No:

5. Email:

6. Date:

B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1.

CAGE and Company (if other than a prime contract holder and first tier subcontractor)

2. Contract Name:

3. Contract Identification Number:

4. Order Number(s) (if applicable):

5.

Date of Contract Award and total contract value:

6.

Average Annual value of the Contract (provide the number of years used to calculate the average):

(if any) Estimated Products Value:

(if any) Estimated Services Value:

7.

Period of Actual Contract Performance

8.

CONUS and/or OCONUS locations:

9.

Describe the products and/work the work effort performed on this referenced contract or as a subcontractor. Word count is limited to no more than 500 words:

3 | P a g e

THE FOLLOWING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONDENT POC.

SECTION III. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE

1.

Name and Respondent’s Job Title (e.g. COR, Contracting Officer, etc.)

2.

Has the Contractor ever been issued a cure notice, show cause notice, etc.? If yes, explain.

____Yes (explain) ____No

3.

Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or terminated for cause? If yes, explain:

4.

If changes in contract dollar amounts throughout the life of the contract increased/decreased was the change generally attributable to customer-issued Change Orders, Contractor-submitted claims, or payment for consideration to the Government and attributed to the Contractor actions?

(please explain):

5. Has the contractor encountered any performance problems related to deliverables, services, and EPA violations? If YES, explain:

6. Rate the contractor’s management of the Contract:

Exceptional Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

a. Appropriate Staffing Levels

b. Effectiveness in Management of Subcontractors

c. Adherence to schedules and Responsiveness to Urgent requirements

d. Timeliness & Efficiency of Customer Support

e. Satisfaction submission of required contract reports

4 | P a g e

7. Compliance with the requirements of the contract; conformance to standards of good workmanship, and responsiveness to technical direction:

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Check

Comments:

8. Adherence to task order estimates; reasonableness of change order proposals; and completeness of billing:

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Check

Comments:

9. Adherence to the contract schedules:

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

10. Contractor’s performance in identifying and resolving problems:

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

11. Contractor’s performance to effectively manage subcontractors (if applicable) and/or team members (this includes payment, billing and invoicing of subcontractors):

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

12. In summary, please give your OVERALL assessment of this contractor’s performance on this contract.

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSES