Att_0018_-_Procedures_for_Submitting_a_CDR.doc

DOC document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
Solicitation - Request for Proposal (RFP) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W52P1J15R0023
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Joint Munitions Command

About this file

This document outlines procedures for submitting a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) related to contract number W52P1J15R0023. The CDR process is used to notify a contractor when a contractual requirement has not been met. It involves an initiating government member documenting the issue in a CDR, coordinating with contracting officers, issuing the CDR to the contractor, and reviewing the contractor's response. The contractor must respond within five business days with proposed corrective actions. Failure to respond may result in escalation to the Procuring Contracting Officer. The point of contact for CDRs is the Administering Contracting Officer for Scranton Army Ammunition Plant.

The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation to manage and operate the Scranton Army Ammunition Plant and produce 155mm and 120mm munitions. It includes an industry day announcement, registration form, and hotel listings for Scranton, Pennsylvania. The soliciting agency is the U.S. Army Contracting Command - Rock Island and New Jersey on behalf of the U.S. Army Joint Munitions Command and Project Manager for Combat Ammunition Systems.

Att 0018 - Procedures for Submitting a CDR

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Solicitation - Request for Proposal (RFP), newest first.
File Type Posted
Att_0017_-_Surge_PWS_REV_A_2017-10-10.pdf PDF
Att_0030_W15QKN-17-R-0018_RFP_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Att_0012_-_Transition_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-06-30.pdf PDF
Att_0021_-_PPQ_for_Facilities_Operation_REV_A_2017-08-28.pdf PDF
Att_0018_-_GFP_List_REV_A_2017-09-06.pdf PDF
Att_0024_-_LIF_MIF_Encl_1_GFP_Currently_in_Layaway_REV_A_2017-09-06.pdf PDF
Att_0015_-_LIF_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-07-17.pdf PDF
Att_0017_-_Surge_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-07-17.pdf PDF
Att_0008_-_Environmental_PWS_-_REV_A_2017-08-11.pdf PDF
Att_0027_-_LIF_MIF_Encl_4_GFP_Prohibited_from_Relocation.pdf PDF
Att_0026_-_LIF_MIF_Encl_3_GFP_Prohibited_from_Layaway.pdf PDF
Att_0003_-_Section_L_2017-07-28_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_0006_-_Property_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-07-07.pdf PDF
Att_0014_-_Facility_Plans_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-07-17.pdf PDF
Att_0022_-_Small_Business_Participation_Plan_Property_Management_2017-06-16.pdf PDF
Att_0029_-_W15QKN-17-R-0018_RFP_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Att_0013_-_ARMS_(Direct)_-_FINAL_2017-06-16.pdf PDF
Att_0004_-_Section_M_2017-07-28_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_0025_-_LIF_MIF_Encl_2_Active_GFP.pdf PDF
Att_0023_-_U.S._DOL_Wage_Determination_No._2015-2453_2016-12-30.pdf PDF
Att_0007_-_Maintenance_and_Utilities_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-07-27.pdf PDF
Att_0025_-_LIF_MIF_Encl_2_Active_GFP.pdf PDF
Att_0027_-_LIF_MIF_Encl_4_GFP_Prohibited_from_Relocation.pdf PDF
Att_0014_-_Facility_Plans_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-07-17.pdf PDF
Att_0028_-_Facility_Drawings_2017-07-05.pdf PDF
Att_0012_-_Transition_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-06-30.pdf PDF
Att_0011_-_IH_OH_-_FINAL_2017-06-30.pdf PDF
Att_0016_-_MIF_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-06-29.pdf PDF
Att_0022_-_Small_Business_Participation_Plan_Property_Management_2017-06-16.pdf PDF
Att_0013_-_ARMS_(Direct)_-_FINAL_2017-06-16.pdf PDF
Att_0019_-_Contract_Discrepancy_Report_Template_2017-06-16.pdf PDF
Att_0017_-_Surge_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-07-17.pdf PDF
Att_0003_-_Section_L_2017-07-28_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_0021_-_PPQ_for_Facilities_Operation_2017-06-16.pdf PDF
Att_0018_-_GFP_List_2017-07-06.pdf PDF
FINAL-Scranton_AAP_EBS-06-25-2015_v2.pdf PDF
Att_0003_-_Price_Matrix_TEP_and_Property_Management.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_0020_-_PPQ_for_Facilities_Operation.docx DOCX document
Att_0009_-_SCAAP_PWS_6_-_OH-IH_-_Draft_RFP.docx DOCX document
Att_0002_-_W15QKN-17-R-0018_Attachments.PDF PDF
W52P1J-15-R-0023_Draft_11-01-2016_FINAL.pdf PDF
Att_0004_-_SCAAP_PWS_1_-_Property_-_Draft_RFP.docx DOCX document
Att_0021_-_Small_Business_Participation_Plan_Property_Management.docx DOCX document
Att_0010_-_SCAAP_PWS_7_-_Utilities-Energy_-_Draft_RFP.docx DOCX document
Att_0007_-_SCAAP_PWS_4_-_Security_-_Draft_RFP.docx DOCX document
Att_0013_-_SCAAP_PWS_10_-_Facility_Plans_-_Draft_RFP.docx DOCX document
Att_0005_-_SCAAP_PWS_2_-_Maintenance_-_Draft_RFP.docx DOCX document
Att_0014_-_SCAAP_PWS_11_-_LIF_-_Draft_RFP.docx DOCX document
Att_0015_-_SCAAP_PWS_12_-_MIF_-_Draft_RFP.docx DOCX document
Registration_Form_Nov_2016_FINAL.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Solicitation - Request for Proposal (RFP) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Contract # Procedures for Submitting a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR)

1. PURPOSE: The Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) is used as a method to notify the contractor when it has failed to meet a contractual requirement. The information collected and reported via the CDR will be used in the development of the ratings given to the contractor in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

2. BACKGROUND: The contract contains a requirement to report on Contractor Performance Information IAW FAR 52.242-4591. CPARS is used to maintain performance reports for this contract. Surveillance and oversight of contractor performance by the government is required to develop ratings to be reported into the CP ARS database. The issuance of a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) will provide the government an opportunity to advise the contractor when a requirement of the contract is not met. A CDR also serves as an official record of performance issues associated with the contract.

3. ACTION: The following steps occur in the process of documenting a CDR:

a. A member of the government staff will initiate a CDR when the contractor fails to meet a requirement of the contract. Such requirements may include but are not limited to a documented suspense (submitting proposals, responding to data calls, etc), submission of a CDRL or submission of an incomplete CDRL, etc.

b. Prior to issuance to the contractor, the initiator of the CDR will coordinate the CDR with the Administrating Contracting Officer (ACO), the Commander’s Representative and the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).

c. The CDR will be issued to the contractor. The contractor must respond with its proposed corrective action and actions it will take to prevent recurrence within five (5) business days to the ACO.

d. The government will review the contractors input into the CDR and provide the evaluation of contractor's response as well as identify any government actions taken as a result of the contractor's response.

4. FOLLOW-UP: If the contractor fails to respond to the CDR within the identified timeframe, and no request for extension has been received by the ACO, the issue will be elevated to the PCO at Army Contracting Command – Rock Island for further action.

5. POINT OF CONTACT: The point of contact for this procedure is the ACO for Scranton Army Ammunition Plant, (570) 340-1168.

Contracting Officer

Army Contracting Command- Rock Island

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .