Att_0020_-_PPQ_for_Facilities_Operation.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation - Request for Proposal (RFP) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J15R0023
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for facilities operation services related to solicitation number W52P1J15R0023. The U.S. Army Contracting Command - Rock Island and U.S. Army Contracting Command - New Jersey on behalf of the U.S. Army Joint Munitions Command and Project Director for Joint Services and Project Manager for Combat Ammunition Systems are seeking past performance information on offerors as part of an industry day announcement regarding the property management and operation of the Scranton Army Ammunition Plant combined with associated production of 155mm and 120mm projectiles and shells. Respondents are to provide ratings and comments on offerors' conformance to requirements, schedule adherence, problem identification and resolution, work effort satisfaction, behavior, and compliance with security and regulatory requirements. Completed questionnaires must be sent directly to the contracting specialist by the response date.
Att 0020 - PPQ for Facilities Operation
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Solicitation - Request for Proposal (RFP) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES OPERATION
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form The Offeror must complete Sections IIA and IIB for each Past Performance reference and send copies to the PPQ respondent(s) identified in IIA in a timely manner. The Offeror shall include these documents with its proposal; however, the PPQ respondent will send the completed questionnaire directly to the POC identified in the PPQ Section IV below.
In order to assess potential contractors ACC-RI contracting office is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. The PPQ respondent will complete all sections of the Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire except sections IIA and IIB. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call or email to confirm or clarify information. This is a critical acquisition being conducted by ACC-RI and your support is sincerely appreciated.
Thank you for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire. The completed questionnaire shall be submitted directly via email to, Contract Specialist, Katie Young, Contract Specialist, katie.m.young.civ@mail.mil.
The subject line in the submission email shall clearly indicate: ‘[Offeror Name] W52P1J-15-R-0023 message shall originate from the PPQ respondent’s Government or corporate email address.
1. GENERAL GUIDANCE
Please use the following rating in scoring the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):
1. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
Please Rate This Contractor With Respect To:
1. Conforming to the contract requirements including specifications, standards of good workmanship, and technical direction:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
Comment: ___________________________________________________________________
1. Contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Contractor’s ability to identify and correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Satisfaction level of work effort performed:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Has the contractor demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior in dealing with your staff and other contractors (including responsiveness and the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes):
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Contractor’s compliance with security requirements OSHA and EPA:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Is there anything else you would like to add?
III. RETURN INFORMATION
When completed, please send electronically via email to:
Katie Young, Contract Specialist, katie.m.young.civ@mail.mil
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .