Att_0014_-_Facility_Plans_PWS_-_FINAL_2017-07-17.pdf

FACILITY PLANS, STRATEGIES, AND ANALYSES

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

(DIRECT)

1. OBJECTIVE: To develop and update plans and strategies for overall facility management to include capacity planning, strategic planning, and investment planning. The results of this planning will provide a tool/roadmap for decision makers regarding facility and investment strategies at Scranton Army Ammunition Plant (SCAAP).

2. BACKGROUND: The Joint Munitions and Lethality Life Cycle Management Command (JM&L LCMC) is responsible for performing Industrial Preparedness Planning (IPP) and Production Base Support (PBS) planning and execution.

2.1 IPP is performed to document production capabilities and capacities, perform production base analyses, assist in developing acquisition strategies, as well as make proper production base decisions. This PWS is for the contractor to provide and update SCAAP production base data required for the Government to perform the IPP mission.

2.2 The PBS program provides for investment and modernization for industrial base capabilities. The effort under this PWS is for the planning and analyses for PBS projects at SCAAP. Execution of individual PBS projects is direct funded via separate Statements of Work (SOW) or in some instances support SOW for work performed by others.

3. REQUIREMENTS:

3.1 Project Management Reviews (PMRs)

3.1.1 The contractor shall support/host periodic on-site PMRs at the request of the Government, typically three times per year. These reviews can range from being a program-wide review and/or project-specific reviews.

3.1.2 These PMRs shall include a review of all recently completed PBS project, in-process PBS projects, and planned PBS projects. Any return on investment figures shall be noted. The PMR shall also include a review of recently completed, in-process, and planned Contractor Investment projects. The PMR shall include a review of any environmental, safety, or security issues. The PMR shall include a review of any other Government-funded project (even from other Government organizations). The PMR shall include a review of any ARMS initiatives or updates. The PMR shall include other topics at the Governments’ request.

3.2 Industrial Preparedness Planning (IPP): The contractor shall respond to industrial base capacity inquiries in one of the following formats: MS Word, PowerPoint, Excel, Project; each inquiry will specify the format. Recurring information requested will include, but is not limited to:

Building/equipment utilization Building/equipment capacities Single point failure areas Identification of bottle necks and time and cost to resolve Critical skills, critical equipment, critical spare parts Identify availability and capability of workforce Critical materials/ingredients Process support to include software and hardware Infrastructure support Estimated useful life of critical buildings or equipment shall be identified and prioritized in need of replacement

3.3 Production Base Support (PBS)

3.3.1 The Contractor shall respond to the annual PBS call letter which requests submission of new project requirements in addition to updating the current project data including, but not limited to, project purpose, benefits, justification, cost estimates, and economic analyses for modernization, layaway, and maintenance of inactive facility projects.

3.3.2 The Contractor shall support/host periodic on-site PBS Call Letter Reviews at the request of the Government to review submissions and priority of projects. The Call Letter Review is once per year, typically combined with a PMR.

3.3.3 The contractor shall perform pre-contract actions for projects scheduled for execution. These tasks include but are not limited to, support Determination and Findings preparation and review, support SOW preparation and review, and preparing responses to requests for proposals (RFPs). This includes any pre-design activities required by the contractor to respond to RFPs. Final or full design of the proposed efforts shall be addressed as a proposed project on a case-by-case basis. Real Property acquisition/modernization shall comply with the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990.

3.4 PWS Cost Breakdown: The contractor shall submit the estimated costs for each Indirect PWS in this contract. The report shall include a description of major cost drivers for each PWS. The Government intends to use this information to track overhead costs related to PWS requirements on Government-owned, Contractor-operated facilities. The information will not be shared outside of the Government. The contractor shall provide updates within 90 days of each contract year. This report is for information purposes only, and will not be construed as a bill. (CDRL A001)

3.5 Cost Control Strategies: The Contractor shall implement a Cost Control Strategy System to control major cost drivers within this Property Management Contract (including any PBS orders issued) and any associated production.

The strategy shall identify all significant cost drivers or high dollar areas within these contracts to be targeted by cost controls. The Contractor shall identify strategies employed to research cost drivers and identify opportunities to reduce said costs; describe planned and completed actions; and identify anticipated and actual return on investments. The Contractor shall describe its Cost Control Strategy System to the Government during Program Management Reviews, and provide an annual report on actions and results at the end of the fiscal year. (CDRL A002)