ATT 0008 - QA Set 21NOV2024.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 105mm M1 Wood Box
- Solicitation number
- W519TC-23-R-0036
About this file
This document appears to be a set of questions and answers (Q&A) regarding solicitation W519TC-23-R-0036 for the 105mm M1 Wood Box. The solicitation is being issued by the Army Contracting Command - Rock Island (ACC-RI) in support of Project Manager Combat Ammunition Systems (PM-CAS). The Q&A addresses various aspects of the requirement, including the availability of technical data packages, procurement history, cushioning requirements, preservative treatment, past performance questionnaire, OPSEC coordinator, facility modifications, first article testing, proposal submission instructions, and an extension to the proposal due date. Key details include that the procurement history includes two current IDIQ contracts, no cushioning requirements beyond ISPM 15 heat treatment, and a preference for prime contractor past performance submissions. The Q&A also provides instructions for submitting proposals via DOD SAFE or email. An extension to the proposal due date was granted until 12 DEC 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ATT 0002 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| W519TC-23-R-0036 AMD 0003.pdf | ||
| ATT 0008 - QA Set 04DEC2024.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATT 0007 - Wood Box Hardware Drawings.pdf | ||
| W519TC-23-R-0036 AMD 0002.pdf | ||
| ATT 0008 - QA Set 26NOV2024.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATT 0007 - Wood Box Hardware Drawings.pdf | ||
| W519TC-23-R-0036 AMD 0001.pdf | ||
| ATT 0002 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| W519TC-23-R-0036_105mm Wood Box RFP_31Oct2024.pdf | ||
| ATT 0003 - DD1423 CDRL Guidance.pdf | ||
| Exhibit A - CDRL_final.pdf | ||
| ATT 0001 Price Matrix for 105mm Wood Box with EPA Index Application_final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATT 0006 - Wood Box TDP Drawings.pdf | ||
| ATT 0004 - ASSIST INSTRUCTIONS.pdf | ||
| ATT 0002 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT 0005 - Sample OPSEC Plan.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Written Q&A
| 105mm Wood Box | ||||
| Industry Questions and Answers (Q&A) | ||||
| # | Question | Answer | Column1 | |
| 1 | In reviewing the documents provided on SAM, we are not able to locate a detailed drawing and technical data package. | The TDP drawings are located at Attachment 0006. In the notes on page 1 of the TDP attachment additional drawings can be found in SPEC MIL-DTL-2427. | Green = RESOLVED | |
| 2 | Is procurement history available for the subject RFP notice? | Yes. Current contracts listed below: W52P1J-19-D-0007, Kaiyuh Sevices, LLC. W52P1J-19-D-0008, Choctaw Defense Manufacturing, LLC.Both contracts awarded FFP, 5-year IDIQ. | Yellow = Needs attention | |
| 3 | Do we need to submit a request to review the controlled documents for our quoting effort on the 105mm M1 Wood Box? | All Wood Box drawings/TDP docs should be available under Attachment 0006. No additional controlled documents are available. | ||
| 4 | Are there any cushioning requirements/specs for the munitions/armaments that the crate may hold? If so, which document is it located in? | No cushioning requirements. | ||
| 5 | Outside of the ISPM 15 heat treat requirements, are there any other preservative method needed such as copper preservation for example? | 1. There are requirements for preservative treatment besides ISPM15. Requirements are within MIL-DTL-2427. | ||
| 6 | Please confirm the correct drawing for Solicitation W519TC-23-R-0036 is drawing 115802-1/2/3/4. | Hardware drawings will be added as an attachment to the RFP. | ||
| 7 | I sent an email to Drawing-Request@pica.army.mil to get copies of the plans for the hardware. The email was located on page 3 of MIL-TDL-2427H. It was returned saying this email does not exist. Is there another email that I can request drawing from. Also, is there a manufacturer of the hardware? | Hardware drawings will be added as an attachment to the RFP. | ||
| 8 | The Past Performance Questionnaire document requested to be completed seems to reference an incorrect Request for Proposal #. Additionally, the POC listed on the document doesn’t seem to match the one listed on the solicitation. Will the Past Performance Questionnaire need to be revised? | PPQ has been revised. | ||
| 9 | I am reaching out to clarify if contractors are required to have an identified certified level II OPSEC coordinator per AR 530-1? We wanted to confirm if this was perhaps added by mistake, as the AR 530-1 would require us to obtain at least a SECRET clearance. | The requirement for a level II OPSEC Coordinator is correct. This requirement is due to the effort being performed at the Contractor's own facilities. | ||
| 10 | Request clarification regarding D.1.a.5 under section L of the solicitation for the 105mm Wood Box. D.1.a.5 excerpt states that the “Offeror must submit a description of any facility, process, inspection, or equipment modification, and any quality control modifications necessary to meet the requirement of the Technical Data Package (TDP). The offeror must demonstrate understanding of any TDP changes, as well as an appropriate approach to meeting the requirements”. We understand that D.1.a.5 requires a description of any modification necessary to meet the requirements of the TDP. However, we would like to confirm the appropriate response if our organization determines that no modifications are needed for the facilities, processes, inspections, equipment, or quality control measures needed. In this case, should we still provide a statement confirming our assessment and understanding of the TDP, even though no changes are required? If so, would we need to demonstrate our existing infrastructure and procedures are fully compliant with the current TDP specification despite no modifications being required on our end? Or should we submit a response explicitly stating the no modification are required? | Either response would be acceptable. You can submit a response stating no facility, process, inspection, or equip modifications are necessary to meet the requirements of the TDP and can provide a statement confirming the assessment and understanding even though no changes are required. | ||
| 11 | Can you please confirm the quantity needed for the FAT testing ? | Per the MIL DTL 2427 FAT requires 15 samples for the tests and 3 samples for visuals, all FAT requirements are in the DTL. | ||
| 12 | Do we need to request a code so we can upload our documents or is it okay to send it to you? Also do you have an example of an IMS Integrated Master Schedule? | Proposals can be sent via DOD SAFE with a request to Joe DePover or Eric Mauricio for a DOD SAFE Link. Sending through email is also acceptable. | ||
| 13 | Section L recommends that only past performance as a prime should be submitted. We have one submission in particular where design, manufacturing, and delivery of repeat deliverables was subcontracted to us, the prime was only a passthrough. Would this be reasonable to include or would the Government still prefer only prime submissions? We are in contact with the Government customer and can provide a PPQ from them. | The Offeror shall submit no more than three contract references with its proposal representing recent and relevant records of |
performance. It is recommended that offerors limit references to those involving its performance as a prime contractor only. Therefore, the Government prefers only prime submissions.
| 14 | We have an CMMC do we need to do an OPSEC plan? | Per Section H of the RFP, the contractor shall prepare and submit a written OPSEC Plan to the Contracting Officer for approval IAW DD 1423/DI-MGMT-80934C within 30 calendar days after receipt of the CI information addressed in paragraph (c) above to be reviewed and approved by the responsible Government OPSEC officer. |
| 15 | Do we need to do a CDRL? If so is it possible to get a blank copy of a CDRL? | Offerror must include all Contract Data Requirements List (CDRLS) submissions located in "Exhibit A". |
| 16 | We want to do option 1 but the solicitation is not on WAWF what can we do? | A WAWF acceptance document shall be provided for the 105mm Wood Box configuration. If a WAWF acceptance document is not submitted, the Offeror will need to submit a response in accordance with Option 2. |
| 17 | We respectfully request an extension to the submission deadline for solicitation W519TC-23-R-0036. The extension is requested to address two key challenges currently impacting offerors’ ability to submit competitive and accurate proposals: Delayed responses from material providers and the upcoming Thanksgiving Holiday. | Extension granted until 12 DEC 2024. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .