ATT 0002 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 105mm M1 Wood Box
- Solicitation number
- W519TC-23-R-0036
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for RFP W519TC-23-R-0036 issued by Army Contracting Command - Rock Island for the procurement of 105mm Wood Boxes (NSN: 8140-01-077-2004, Part Number: 9271047). The questionnaire must be submitted to eric.a.mauricio.civ@army.mil by December 12, 2024.
The questionnaire is divided into two sections: Section 1 requires offerors to provide contract details including contract number, award date, item description, relevance to current procurement, dollar value, quantity, delivery rates, and points of contact. Section 2, to be completed by references, evaluates contractor performance across multiple areas including delivery schedule adherence, quality of RFVs/ECPs submissions, First Article Test performance, critical characteristic failures, overall quality, responsiveness, and contractor/customer relationship. The evaluation specifically focuses on any delivery delays, test failures, contract terminations, and corrective actions taken during previous contract performance.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W519TC-23-R-0036 AMD 0003.pdf | ||
| ATT 0008 - QA Set 04DEC2024.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATT 0007 - Wood Box Hardware Drawings.pdf | ||
| W519TC-23-R-0036 AMD 0002.pdf | ||
| ATT 0008 - QA Set 26NOV2024.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATT 0007 - Wood Box Hardware Drawings.pdf | ||
| ATT 0008 - QA Set 21NOV2024.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W519TC-23-R-0036 AMD 0001.pdf | ||
| ATT 0002 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| W519TC-23-R-0036_105mm Wood Box RFP_31Oct2024.pdf | ||
| ATT 0003 - DD1423 CDRL Guidance.pdf | ||
| Exhibit A - CDRL_final.pdf | ||
| ATT 0001 Price Matrix for 105mm Wood Box with EPA Index Application_final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATT 0006 - Wood Box TDP Drawings.pdf | ||
| ATT 0004 - ASSIST INSTRUCTIONS.pdf | ||
| ATT 0002 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT 0005 - Sample OPSEC Plan.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire 105mm Wood Box Request for Proposal W519TC-23-R-0036
The Army Contracting Command - Rock Island appreciates your input on the below Contractor’s performance by taking a few moments to provide past performance information on the contract / purchase order you have been identified as the POC for. The Offeror shall complete Section 1 below. The reference shall complete Section 2 and submit the questionnaire to the contact below.
Your time and effort is greatly appreciated. Please submit the completed questionnaire to eric.a.mauricio.civ@army.mil. If you have any questions with regard to this request, please don’t hesitate to contact Eric Mauricio at the email above.
SECTION 1
i. Contract Number and Award Date:
ii. Item(s) Description
iii. Brief explanation of the contract’s relevance to the current procurement
iv. Contract dollar value
v. Quantity and monthly delivery rate, if applicable
vi. Buying activity or company, and mailing address
vii. Point(s) of contact, including names, job titles, telephone numbers, and email addresses.
SECTION 2
PLEASE SUBMIT PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE BY 12/12/2024 TO:
eric.a.mauricio.civ@army.mil
1. Did the contractor meet the original contract delivery schedule? Yes ___ No ____
a. If no, was it contractor or Government caused delay?
b. If contractor, why?
c. How many times was the delivery schedule revised due to contractor delay?
d. If yes, was the contractor ahead of schedule and what benefit did it provide to the customer (Government or commercial)?
2. Throughout the course of your contract:
a. Requests for Variance (RFVs) and/or Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs): How would you rate the timeliness and quality of these submissions?
b. Did the contractor have any First Article Test or Lot Acceptance Test failures? If yes, please specify how this failure impacted the Government.
c. Was the contract terminated for any reason? Please specify if applicable.
3. Critical characteristic failures:
a. How would you rate the timeliness and quality of Failure Analysis Corrective Action Reports (FACARs)?
b. How many critical characteristic failures did the Contractor have?
c. Did the critical failures cause a major delay in schedule? If so, how many times and what was the impact to the Government?
4. How would you describe the overall quality of the contractor? WHY?
5. Was the contractor responsiveness to requests for information? WHY?
6. How would you describe the contractor/customer relationship for this contract? WHY?
7. Any other comments regarding Quality, Delivery Schedule Performance/On-Time Delivery or about the contractor’s past performance in general?
Signature of person submitting Questionnaire Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .