Fort Wainwright W5168W24R0014 Solicitation Amendment 1.pdf

PDF 339 KB Posted

Attached to
W5168W-24-R-0014 Dining Facility Attendant - Fort Wainwright
Solicitation number
W5168W-24-R-0014
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for dining facility attendant services at Fort Wainwright in Alaska. The contractor shall provide quality food services and flexible, efficient, and cost-effective operations at designated dining facilities in support of the installation's food service program. Services include dining facility operations and remote site feeding. The period of performance is one base year with four one-year options. The solicitation sets aside this requirement entirely for small businesses and notifies offerors of the priority for proposals received from state licensing agencies and their blind vendors in accordance with the Randolph-Sheppard Act. Proposals are due by January 11, 2024 and the government intends to make award by February 15, 2024. The solicitation includes instructions for the preparation of proposals in four volumes covering solicitation documents, technical approach, past performance, and pricing. Pricing shall be submitted using the pricing matrix attachment, which is based on the Department of Labor wage determination also attached. The estimated annual workload and facility plans are provided as attachments.

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provi ded herei n, all t erms and condit ions of t he document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remai ns unchanged and in ful l force and effect .

15A. NAME AND TIT LE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

ST ANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescr ibed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to make the f ollow ing changes.

Clause 52.219-14 w /CD 2021-O0008 (Feb 2023) changed to f ull text Clause 52.219-14 (Oct 2022) removed.

Corrected contract specialist contact inf ormation.

Additions:

Attachment N - Example Staf fing Matrix FWAK Attachment Q - Technical Questions and Answ ers (W5168W24R0014) Attachment R - Sample Materials Quantity List

1. CONTRACT ID CODE P AGE OF P AGES

J 1 11

16A. NAME AND T ITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DAT E SIGNED

BY 25-Jan-2024

16B. UNITED ST AT ES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contract ing Officer)(Signature of person author ized t o sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, Count y, Stat e and Zip Code) X W5168W24R0014

X 9B. DAT ED (SEE IT EM 11)

22-Dec-2023

10B. DAT ED (SEE IT EM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITAT ION NO.

11. THIS IT EM ONLY APPLIES T O AMENDMENT S OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered soli cit ati on i s amended as set forth in It em 14. The hour and date specified for rece ipt of Offer is ext ended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowl edge rece ipt of t his amendment pri or to the hour and date specified in the sol ici tat ion or as amended by one of t he fol lowing methods:

(a) By compl eti ng Items 8 and 15, and returning copi es of the amendment ; (b) By acknowledgi ng recei pt of thi s amendment on each copy of t he offer submit ted;

or (c) By s epara te let ter or t elegram whi ch i ncludes a refe rence t o t he s olic ita tion and amendment numbers . FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE P LACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS P RIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SP ECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of thi s amendment you desire t o change an offer already submit ted, s uch change may be made by t elegram or let ter, provided each t elegram or l ett er makes re ference to the sol ici tat ion and this amendment , and is received prior to the openi ng hour and dat e speci fi ed.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DAT A (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORT H IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. T HE ABOVE NUMBERED CONT RACT /ORDER IS MODIFIED T O REFLECT THE ADMINIST RATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORT H IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO T HE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. T HIS SUPPLEMENT AL AGREEMENT IS ENT ERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OT HER (Specify type of modification and authorit y)

E. IMPORTANT: Contract or is not, is required to sign this document and return copies t o the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/cont ract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/ MODIFICATION NO. 5. P ROJECT NO.(If appli cable )

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25-Jan-2024

CODE

FDO FSH IRC

2371 INFANTRY POST RD, BLDG 602

FORT SAM HOUSTON TX 78234

W5168W 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other t han item 6)

4. REQUISITION/P URCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See I tem 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W5168W24R0014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1-Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

A. Proposal Submittal and Communications Regarding this Solicitation

1. All proposals in response to this solicitation shall be delivered no later than the date and time stated in Box 8 of the SF1449.

2. Offerors are required to e-mail their proposal documents to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at the following email addresses: javelin.m.carouthers.civ@army.mil and michael.d.schneider55.civ@army.mil, respectively. Should the files be too large to email, 20 MB or more, the Offeror will need to e-mail the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist and use the Contracting Communication Module in Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) for the submission of their proposal. The Offerors e-mail submission or submission through the Contracting Communication Module in PIEE must be made no later than (NLT) the closing date and time specified in Box 8 of the SF1449.

3. A virtual Site Visit for this requirement will be held on 8 January 2024 at 11:00 CST.

Site Visit Registration Instructions: Upon joining the site visit, the guest username shall be changed to reflect the organization’s name. If multiple representatives are logging in from different devices, ensure each representative changes the guest username to the organization’s name.

Link: https://dod.teams.microsoft.us/l/meetup-join/19%3adod%3ameeting_07b4626e1388460c9d463987fda91d70%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a %22fae6d70f-954b-4811-92b6-0530d6f84c43%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%229eb2bcfa-d638-4031-b179- 108ad659ee2f%22%7d

Any and all technical questions or clarifications will need to be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist as specified in the instructions below.

All Technical Questions are due No Later Than (NLT) 11 January 2024 at 12:00 PM CST. Offerors will submit questions in writing to Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist javelin.m.carouthers.civ@army.mil and michael.d.schneider55.civ@army.mil respectively. The Government will answer questions received up until due date listed above and provide responses to interested parties via System for Award Management (SAM) website at https://sam.gov/content/home. Questions received after this date may not be answered.

If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise deemed unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale.

B. General Instructions

1. The proposal must demonstrate the Offeror’s capacity and capability to meet all of the requirements set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) referenced herein, convey the Offeror’s capabilities for transforming the Offeror’s approach understanding into accomplishment; provide in detail the plans and methods for so doing; and provide, as requested below, the price to meet contract requirements.

michael.d.schneider5 Highlight michael.d.schneider5 Highlight

2. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offerors, the contracting officer will review this determination, and if adequate price competition exists, no additional information will be requested. However, if at any time during this process the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness of the proposed price.

3. This procurement is subject to the Randolph-Sheppard Act (R-SA), 20 U.S.C. §107, Operation of Vending Facilities and 34 CFR §395.33, Operation of Cafeterias by Blind Vendors, which establishes a priority for blind persons recognized and represented by the State Licensing Agency (SLA), in the award of contracts for the operation of cafeterias on federal facilities. Accordingly, although the solicitation is set-aside 100% for small business, the State Licensing Agency will also be permitted to submit a proposal in accordance with 34 CFR 395.33(b). This notice is not designed to discourage competition; rather, it notifies all potential offerors that the priority established by the R-SA for proposals received from SLAs and their blind vendors is applicable to this procurement.

4. The selection of a source for award purposes will be conducted utilizing FAR Part 12 (Acquisition of Commercial Items) in conjunction with FAR Part 15 (Contracting by Negotiation). Offers will be evaluated using the criteria under the Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items. Award will be made to a single offeror whose timely offer is deemed responsible IAW FAR, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, represents the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) offer, or to the SLA under the R-SA priority.

5. By submission of its offer, the offeror agrees to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements to include those identified specifically as evaluation factors and subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being rejected.

6. Period of Acceptance of Offers: FAR clause 52.212-1 (c), Period for Acceptance of Offers, is 240 calendar days.

7. Instructions outlined in paragraph C below prescribe the format for the proposal and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals.

8. Debriefings. Upon notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing IAW the requirements of FAR 15.506.

C. Proposal Preparation Instructions

1. The offeror’s proposal shall consist of four (4) separate volumes: Volume I – Solicitation Documents, Volume II

– Technical, Volume III – Past Performance, and Volume IV – Price.

2. Proposal Format.

a. The proposals shall be organized into the four (4) volumes identified at Table 1. A cover sheet should be provided, clearly marked as to volume number, title, solicitation identification, and offeror’s name. All text shall be single spaced and on white background with black color font (Black and white requirement does not apply to graphics or photos. Company stationery and logos are acceptable). Documents shall be easily readable (12-pitch type or 10-point proportion spacing). Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections. Digital copies shall be provided in Microsoft Word, PDF, PowerPoint, and/or Excel as outlined in Table 1. The file name shall be “Company Name – Initial” for the first submission. The file name of later submissions (if necessary) shall be “Company Name – Revision X” with X indicating the number of the revision.

Page limitations are as follows in Table 1:

Table 1 – Proposal Submittal Instructions and Format

VOLUME TITLE NO. OF DIGITAL &

ELECTRONIC COPIES

PAGE LIMIT

I Solicitation Documents SF1449 Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs

Representation, Certification, and Other Statements of Offerors

Exceptions / Assumptions Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan

Property Management Plan (PMP) Subcontracting Plan (SLA Only)

1 EA – MS Word or PDF N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

II Technical (Note: Staffing Matrix shall be provided in Excel)

1 EA – MS Word, PDF or Excel

100 Total

III Past Performance 1 EA – MS Word, PDF or Excel

10 pages per reference

IV Price (Note: Pricing Matrix shall be provided in Excel)

1 EA – MS Word or Excel N/A

b. Proposal Limitations. The proposal shall not exceed the limits stated at Table 1 (above). If the page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit shall be removed and unread. The Government will not accept any changes to the offeror’s proposal after the closing date of the solicitation (see FAR Provision 52.212-1(f), for further information regarding late proposals). If discussions become necessary, page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors.

c. Page Limit includes all appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, or drawings.

d. Page Limit does not include covers for volumes, tables of contents, staffing matrix (Attachment H) and section dividers/tables if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. Pages will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams or extraneous data. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

e. What Counts As A Page. A page shall be an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper. Letter size and spacing requirements for illustrations and tables can be at the discretion of the offeror but must be easily readable. Margins shall be at least 1 inch on the top and bottom and ¾ inch on the side. The offeror shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. In the event an offeror creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

f. Indexing. Each volume shall contain a detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.

g. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used with a definition for each.

3. Proposal Content.

a. Volume 1 – Solicitation Documents. Failure to follow the Contract Proposal preparation instructions may cause your proposal to be deemed unacceptable by the Government. Volume I shall be organized as follows and contain the identified information.

TAB A. SF 1449 (Solicitation, Offer and Award) – shall be submitted fully completed. The offeror is cautioned that the SF 1449 must contain an original signature in Block 30a of the form. The contractor shall acknowledge any amendments to the RFP IAW the instructions on the SF 1449 and with Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors of the Solicitation, FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items. The offeror shall provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contract regarding decisions made with respect to the proposal and who can obligate the company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

TAB B. Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs – The offeror shall ensure the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation is fully completed and error free. It shall contain the offeror’s prices for the established Contract Line Items Numbers (CLINS). All final monetary extensions shall be in whole dollars only.

TAB C. Representation, Certification, and Other Statements of Offerors – Offeror must have filled out an online provision FAR Clause 52.212-3 - Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Products and Commercial Services, Online Reps and Certs at System for Award Management (https://www.sam.gov). If Offeror or teaming partner/subcontractor is a small business, they shall ensure certification as a small business under North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 561720.

In accordance with Class Deviation 2023-O0001 - Verification of Eligibility of Small Business Joint Ventures Effective October 28, 2022, a small business joint venture offeror must submit, with its offer, the representation required in paragraph (c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications- Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and paragraph (c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations, in accordance with 52.204-8(d) and 52.212-3(b) for the following categories:

(A) Small business;

(B) Service-disabled veteran-owned small business;

(C) Women-owned small business (WOSB) under the WOSB Program;

(D) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business under the WOSB Program; or

(E) Historically underutilized business zone small business.”

TAB D. Exceptions/Assumptions (if required) – Identification and explanation of any exceptions or assumptions.

An exception is an objection to solicitation requirements. If the offeror finds it necessary to take exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly identify the applicable solicitation document, page / paragraph, requirement / portion, and its rationale / impact. Offerors are cautioned that taking an exception may render the offer ineligible for award.

This information shall be provided in the format below in Table 2.

Table 2 – Solicitation Exceptions

Solicitation Document Page/Paragraph Requirement/Portion Rationale & Impact

PWS

Evaluation Factors for Award, etc.

Applicable Page and Paragraph Numbers.

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken.

Describe the rationale and impact of the exception on the performance, schedule, cost, to include any benefit that accrues to the Government, An assumption is an Offeror’s fact or facts based on its interpretation of the solicitation requirements. If the offeror finds it necessary to list its assumptions in response to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly identify the applicable solicitation document, page / paragraph, requirement / portion, and a narrative why the facts(s) used to make an assumption was necessary to develop a proposal.

This information shall be provided in the format below in Table 3.

Table 3 – Solicitation Assumptions

Solicitation Document Page/Paragraph Requirement/Portion Narrative

PWS

Evaluation Factors for Award, etc.

Applicable Page and Paragraph Numbers.

Identify the requirement or portion for which the assumption is made.

Describe why the fact(s) used to make an assumption was necessary to develop a proposal.

TAB E. Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan - Offerors shall submit a Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan IAW DFARS Provision 252.237-7024, Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Services. The Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan will not be included in the source selection evaluation or be considered in the basis for award. However, Failure to submit and negotiate a Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan acceptable to the Contacting Officer will make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract.

TAB F. Property Management Plan (PMP) - Offerors shall submit a PMP IAW FAR Clause 52.245-1, Government Property. The PMP is to provide an overview of “how” the contractor intends to manage Government Property in its possession in accordance with FAR 52.245-1 requirements. The PMP shall also include any customary commercial practices, voluntary consensus standards, or industry leading practices the contractor plans to use in managing Government Property. The PMP will not be included in the source selection evaluation or be considered in the basis for award. However, Failure to submit and negotiate a PMP acceptable to the Contacting Officer will make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract.

TAB G: Subcontracting Plan. The priority established by the R-SA applies to this acquisition. This requirement is being set-aside for small business. Therefore, only the SLA is required to submit subcontracting plans, and those plans must contain all the elements required in FAR Clause 52.219-9 Alt II and DFARS Clause 252.219-7003. The subcontracting plan shall be submitted with the proposal. Subcontracting plans shall contain separate percentage goals using Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), HUBZone Small Business, Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB), and Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) concerns as subcontractors. Small business concerns are not required to submit a subcontracting plan. The subcontracting plan will not be included in the source selection evaluation or be considered in the basis for award. However, failure of the SLA to submit and negotiate a subcontracting plan acceptable to the Contacting Officer will make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract.

Note: The Army recognizes that under the Randolph Sheppard Act, subcontracting opportunities may not exist due to the nature of the act and applicable state laws and / or administrative rules. If the SLA believes that no subcontracting opportunities exist (e.g., a subcontracting relationship does not apply to a blind vendor that is appointed in accordance with the R-SA and the applicable state rules / laws) please include the justification in your proposal and the Contracting Officer will seek to waive the subcontracting plan requirement in accordance with FAR 19.705-2(c).

b. Volume II – Technical Volume.

(1) The Technical Volume shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims in the Offeror’s proposal. The responses will be evaluated against the Technical Capability Factor and Subfactor defined in the Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items.

Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Technical requirements or the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect and understanding of the requirement or the capability to perform. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS (including referenced publications or technical data); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used” etc., will be considered unacceptable. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their technical capabilities and past experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

See Table 1 for page limits associated with the proposal.

(2) The Technical proposal will be evaluated against the Technical Capability Factor and Subfactor defined in the Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items. The section shall be prepared in an orderly format and in sufficient detail to enable the Government to make a thorough evaluation of the contractor’s technical competence and ability to comply with the contract task requirements specified in the PWS.

(3) The volume shall be organized according to the following general outline.

Tab A – Table of Contents Tab B – List of Tables and Drawings Tab C – Cross Reference Matrix Tab D – Factor 1 Technical Capability

(4) Additional information specific to Tab D of the Technical Volume follows:

TAB D. Technical Capability.

Subfactor 1 - Staffing Plan. The staffing plan shall include proposed staffing by labor categories to perform the required services in each building listed in the PWS and Solicitation Attachment F – Estimated Workload.

Offerors shall utilize the Solicitation Attachment H - Staffing Matrix, for depicting their staffing. Offerors are only required to complete the Staffing Matrix for CLINs/SubCLINS within the Pricing Matrix that contain estimated quantities.

In addition to completing the Staffing Matrix, offerors shall provide rationale for their staffing for the applicable dining facilities to specifically address the following:

(a) Explain the logic for the staffing (FTEs x labor categories) for not only during serving times, but for hours before and after serving times;

(b) Rationale for staffing to ensure successful continuous operations of all PWS tasks during feeding times (to include as patrons/units rotate through the facility).

Rationale needs to include their methodology for accommodating fluctuating meals within the bands, cross-utilization of personnel and minimizing employee turnover.

c. Volume III – Past Performance.

Offerors are requested to provide information on up to 5 previous Government contracts whose effort is recent and relevant to the effort required by this solicitation.

a. “Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last 3 years from the date of the solicitation. If the offeror has not had 5 Government contracts within the last 3 years from the date of the solicitation, information on recent and relevant subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted.

b. “Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation.

i. Scope: Similarity of experience in the areas defined in the PWS.

ii. Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the PWS.

iii. Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the PWS. For complexity, not only will the tasks performed by the offeror be considered, but also the offeror’s ability to coordinate tasks (e.g., concurrent performance requirements).

Past performance information described herein is required on the offeror and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners proposed to perform 25% of the proposed effort based on the total proposed price. The offeror shall submit, along with the information required in this paragraph, a consent letter executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror’s performance.

If applicable, Offeror’s may provide the experience or past performance of a parent / affiliate / predecessor company to an Offeror where the firm’s proposal demonstrates that the resources of the parent / affiliate / predecessor will affect the performance of the Offeror. The Offeror shall demonstrate that the resources of the parent / affiliate / predecessor company (its workforce, management, facilities, or other resources) shall be provided or relied upon for contract performance such that the parent / affiliate / predecessor will have meaningful involvement in contract performance.

(3) Submission Requirements. The offeror shall submit a Past Performance Volume containing the following:

Table of Contents

Summary Page describing the role of the offeror and each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner that the offeror is required to provide Past Performance specific relevant contract reference sheets for the past performance experience IAW Attachment L.

Consent Letters executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing the release of past performance information so the offeror can respond to such information. A sample consent letter can be found at Attachment K.

Client Authorization Letters for each identified effort for a commercial customer authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror’s performance.

Specific Relevant Contracts Format. Complete sheets IAW Attachment L and ensure that the submission is limited to 10 pages per reference. The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or as a subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting assertion of relevance and how it is determined that the work previously performed is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.

Past Performance Questionnaire – See Attachment M - Past Performance Questionnaire. For each of the contracts the offeror describes in Attachment L, the offeror is requested to provide a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment M) to a reference at the organization that awarded the contract. It is requested that the reference, not the offeror, email the completed Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment M) BEFORE THE DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS directly to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at the following email addresses:

javelin.m.carouthers.civ@army.mil and michael.d.schneider55.civ@army.mil. The offeror, NOT THE GOVERNMENT, is responsible for ensuring that the Government receives a sufficient number of questionnaires.

d. Volume IV – Price. The offeror shall provide a price for each CLIN included in the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation. The offer shall complete the pricing matrix, (Attachment G – Pricing Matrix) and shall provide a price for each CLIN/SubCLIN in the pricing matrix. Offerors are required to submit a unit price and extended amount (estimated quantity X Unit Price = Extended Amount) for each Building within the Pricing Matrix. The offerors shall utilize the extended CLIN pricing from the pricing matrix to price the applicable CLIN in the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation.

The offeror shall ensure prices are represented in whole dollars only. The offeror shall include in their pricing matrix a breakdown by each labor category subject to the SCA WD and/or CBA the basic hourly labor rates being paid.

(1) Offerors are required to submit prices for Phase-in, Project Management, each dining facility, and CMR in the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation and Attachment G - Pricing Matrix. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding six (6) months of the offeror’s final ordering year price to the offeror’s total price.

(2) The offeror is informed that Department of Labor Wage Determination is applicable to this requirement, see Solicitation Attachment I – CBA/ Supplement Union Agreement.

ATTACHMENT LIST

Attachment List

Attachment A: FWAK DFAC Local Map Attachment B: FWAK AFMIS Headcount FY23_FY22_FY21 Attachment C: FWAK DFA Building Plans Attachment D-4: FWAK Incidental Property Attachment E: FWAK Sample Materials List Attachment F: Estimated Workload Data – FWAK DFA 5 July 2023 Attachment G: FWAK Pricing Matrix – 14Nov23 Attachment H: FWAK DFA Staffing Matrix 3OCT23 Attachment I: Fort Wainwright ISC CBA 2022-2025 Attachment J: FWAK Pictures of Facilities Attachment K: Consent Forms for Release of Past Performance Information Attachment L: Specific Relevant Contracts Reference Sheets Attachment M: Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment N: Example Staffing Matrix FWAK Attachment O: FWAK DFA PWS 6 Nov 23 Attachment P: Fairbanks North Wage Determination 15-5683 Attachment Q: Technical Questions and Answers (W5168W24R0014) Attachment R: Sample Materials Quantity List

52.219-14 LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING (DEVIATION 2021-O0008) (FEB 2023)

(a) This clause does not apply to the unrestricted portion of a partial set-aside.

(b) Definition. “Similarly situated entity,” as used in this clause, means a first-tier subcontractor, including an independent contractor, that—

(1) Has the same small business program status as that which qualified the prime contractor for the award (e.g., for a small business set-aside contract, any small business concern, without regard to its socioeconomic status); and

(2) Is considered small for the size standard under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code the prime contractor assigned to the subcontract.

(c) Applicability. This clause applies only to—

(1) Contracts that have been set aside for any of the small business concerns identified in 19.000(a)(3);

(2) Part or parts of a multiple-award contract that have been set aside for any of the small business concerns identified in 19.000(a)(3);

(3) Contracts that have been awarded on a sole-source basis in accordance with subparts 19.8, 19.13, 19.14, and 19.15;

(4) Orders expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and that are—

(i) Set aside for small business concerns under multiple-award contracts, as described in 8.405-5 and 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F); or michael.d.schneider5 Highlight michael.d.schneider5 Highlight michael.d.schneider5 Highlight

(ii) Issued directly to small business concerns under multiple-award contracts as described in 19.504(c)(1)(ii);

(5) Orders, regardless of dollar value, that are—

(i) Set aside in accordance with subparts 19.8, 19.13, 19.14, or 19.15 under multiple-award contracts, as described in 8.405-5 and 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F); or

(ii) Issued directly to concerns that qualify for the programs described in subparts 19.8, 19.13, 19.14, or 19.15 under multiple-award contracts, as described in 19.504(c)(1)(ii); and

(6) Contracts using the HUBZone price evaluation preference to award to a HUBZone small business concern unless the concern waived the evaluation preference.

(d) Independent contractors. An independent contractor shall be considered a subcontractor.

(e) Limitations on subcontracting. By submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Contractor agrees that in performance of a contract assigned a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for—

(1) Services (except construction), it will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding certain other direct costs and certain work performed outside the United States (see paragraph (e)(1)(i)), to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor’s 50 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded. When a contract includes both services and supplies, the 50 percent limitation shall apply only to the service portion of the contract. The following services may be excluded from the 50 percent limitation:

(i) Other direct costs, to the extent they are not the principal purpose of the acquisition and small business concerns do not provide the service. Examples include airline travel, work performed by a transportation or disposal entity under a contract assigned the environmental remediation NAICS code 562910), cloud computing services, or mass media purchases.

(ii) Work performed outside the United States on awards made pursuant to the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, or work performed outside the United States required to be performed by a local contractor.

(2) Supplies (other than procurement from a nonmanufacturer of such supplies), it will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor’s 50 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded. When a contract includes both supplies and services, the 50 percent limitation shall apply only to the supply portion of the contract;

(3) General construction, it will not pay more than 85 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor’s 85 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded; or

(4) Construction by special trade contractors, it will not pay more than 75 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor’s 75 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded.

(f) The Contractor shall comply with the limitations on subcontracting as follows:

(1) For contracts, in accordance with paragraphs (c)(1), (2), (3) and (6) of this clause – [Contracting Officer check as appropriate.] ___ By the end of the base term of the contract and then by the end of each subsequent option period; or X By the end of the performance period for each order issued under the contract.

(2) For orders, in accordance with paragraphs (c)(4) and (5) of this clause, by the end of the performance period for the order.

(g) A joint venture agrees that, in the performance of the contract, the applicable percentage specified in paragraph

(e) of this clause will be performed by the aggregate of the joint venture participants.

(1) In a joint venture comprised of a small business protege and its mentor approved by the Small Business Administration, the small business protege shall perform at least 40 percent of the work performed by the joint venture. Work performed by the small business protege in the joint venture must be more than administrative functions.

(2) In an 8(a) joint venture, the 8(a) participant(s) shall perform at least 40 percent of the work performed by the joint venture. Work performed by the 8(a) participants in the joint venture must be more than administrative functions.

(End of clause)

The following have been deleted:

52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting OCT 2022

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .