20200813 RFI Log CTANG Track CEKT182732.pdf
PDF 165 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W50SC2-20-R-0005
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document contains a request for information and responses related to a federal design-build construction contract opportunity. The contract is for the construction of a quarter mile running track at Bradley Air National Guard Base in East Granby, Connecticut. The project value is between $500,000 and $1 million. Questions addressed include clarification on surface material requirements, soil stockpile locations, as-built survey needs, and an extension to the period of performance. Responses provided adjustment to the statement of work and confirmation of design compliance standards. The solicitation number is W50SC2-20-R-0005 and is a total small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 237990 and size standard of $39.5 million average annual revenue. The agency is the Department of the Army National Guard.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W50SC2-20-R-0005 Amendment 0001 20200821.pdf | ||
| 20200821 RFI Log CTANG Track.pdf | ||
| 20200820 RFI Log CTANG Track CEKT182732.pdf | ||
| CES CEKT182732 Pre-Proposal Presentation.pdf | ||
| Pre-Proposal Attendance.pdf | ||
| W50SC2-20-R-0005 Pre-Proposal 06 AUG 20.pdf | ||
| EXHIBIT A.docx | DOCX document | |
| EXHIBIT B.docx | DOCX document | |
| W50SC2-20-R-0005.pdf | ||
| EXHIBIT C.docx | DOCX document | |
| EXHIBIT D.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Connecticut Air National Guard Construct Quarter Mile Track CEKT182732
W50SC2‐20‐R‐0005
Item Reference RFI CTANG Response
Spec section 01 10 10 paragraph 6.3.4.4
Specification section 01 10 10 paragraph 6.3.4.4 states that “The pavement section for the asphalt running track shall be in accordance with UFC 4‐740‐02”.UFC 4‐740‐02 Table 5‐8 lists the surface materials of the track as “a first‐class, full‐pour polyurethane synthetic surface, including all necessary sub‐structure and drainage to obtain long‐life durability, pursuant to the guidelines of \1\ NCAA Cross Country/Track and Field Rules. /1/ The minimum thickness of the track surface must be ½ in. (13 mm) and the surface color will be determined by the installation”. Other section of the design requirements imply that the track is an “asphalt running track” and does not refer to the ½” full‐pour polyurethane synthetic surface. Specification section 01 10 10 paragraph 6.3.4.4 states that “The pavement section for the asphalt running track shall be in accordance with UFC 4‐740‐02”.UFC 4‐740‐02 Table 5‐8 lists the surface materials of the track as “a first‐class, full‐pour polyurethane synthetic surface, including all necessary sub‐structure and drainage to obtain long‐life durability, pursuant to the guidelines of \1\ NCAA Cross Country/Track and Field Rules. /1/ The minimum thickness of the track surface must be ½
in. (13 mm) and the surface color will be determined by the installation”. Other section of the design requirements imply that the track is an “asphalt running track” and does not refer to the ½” full‐pour polyurethane synthetic surface. 1. Is the ½” full‐pour polyurethane synthetic surface required for this project? 2. Is there a preferred color selection? 3. No pavement section showing minimal thicknesses of asphalt or base material is supplied in UFC 4‐740‐02. Is this to be determined by the designer of record or are there minimum Base requirements that must be met? 4. Please confirm only the pavement section must comply with requirements of UFC 4‐470‐02 and no other requirements such as dimensions, markings or other requirements as stated per \1\ NCAA Cross Country/Track and Field Rules as many of these requirements conflict with what is shown in the 35% drawings and ANGH 32‐ 1084 paragraph 12.5
1. 1/2" Full‐pour polyurethane synnthetic surface is not required for this project. 2. Not applicable as 1/2" full‐pour polyurethane synthetic surface is not required. 3.
Contractors are to follow American Sports Builders Association's (ASBA) asphalt guidelines for minimum thickness. 4. Contractors are to follow American Sports Builders Association's (ASBA) asphalt guidelines for construction.
SOW Section 5 paragraph 5.3, Spec section 01 10 10 paragraph 3.2.5
Statement of Work Section 5 paragraph 5.3 states “Establish an acceptable stockpile location for soil to be reutilized as common fill. No Soil is allowed to be removed from the site due to potential pesticide contamination.” . It is assumed that if OPI #2 is awarded then the in‐field area could be used as the stockpile location. Specification section 01 10 10 paragraph 3.2.5 States:“There are no designated borrow material areas located on the Bradley ANG Base installation. See attached sample specification Excavation and Management of Contaminated Soils in Appendix 4.” If this item is not awarded, will the Base provide an acceptable stockpile area for the pesticide contaminated fill?
Yes, soil stockpile location will be outside of the track area.
3 Is an on ground as‐built survey required? Yes, as‐built is required 4 Is soil sample and analysis required for suspected pesticide contaminated soils? Not unless topsoil must be moved off site.
The period of performance is 180 Days. With the anticipated start date in October and the design period of several weeks, virtually the entire construction phase of the project will be in winter months.
Will the ANG consider and alternative period of performance to accommodate the construction during the construction season as most of the work on this project will be weather sensitive?
The PoP will be extended to 270 days.
As of 8/13/2020 2:17 PM Page 1 of 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .