Attachment 4 - Hazardous Material Survey - 2019.pdf

Hazardous Materials Survey McEntire Joint National Guard Base –

Corrosion Control Building (#1046) Eastover, SC

December 5, 2018 Prepared For: HDR

9781 S. Meridian Blvd., Englewood, CO 80112 ARM Project No. 12-7232-18

Report Compiled By

Robbie Robertson AHERA Asbestos Inspector

Report Reviewed By

Sid Havird AHERA Asbestos Inspector / Project Manager

1210 1st STREET SOUTH EXTENSION / COLUMBIA, SC 29209 / phone 803-783-3314 fax 803-783-2587

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

3.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALSURVEY

3.1 Regulatory Overview

3.2 Visual Assessment

3.3 Physical Assessment

3.4 Sample Collection

3.5 Sample Analysis

3.6 Asbestos Results and Recommendations

4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY

4.1 Scope of the Limited Lead-Based Paint Survey

4.2 Summary of Lead-Based Paint Results

4.3 Lead-Based Paint Results and Recommendations

5.0 MOLD SURVEY

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Scope of Indoor Air Quality Survey

5.3 Summary of Indoor Air Quality Inspection

5.4 Air and Surface Sample Results

6.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALSURVEY

7.0 WARRANTY

APPENDICES

A. FIGURES

B. ASBESTOS SAMPLE SUMMARY TABLES

C. ANALYTICAL RESULTS

D. INSPECTORS LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS

E. XRF FIELD DATA AND PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS SHEET

F. PHOTOGRAPHS

McEntire Joint National Guard Base, Bld. 1046 ARM Project No. 12-7232-18 Hazardous Materials Survey December 5, 2018

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

HDR has commissioned ARM Environmental Services, Inc. (ARM) to conduct a hazardous materials survey of Building 1046 (Corrosion Control Building) at McIntire Joint National Guard Base located in Eastover, SC. The purpose of this hazardous material survey is to identify, to the extent feasible, hazardous building materials that may require abatement before renovation or demolition activities.

The table below shows the regulated building materials that were identified or assumed during this survey. NOTE: Any bulbs, ballasts, etc. observed during the survey which had no visible labels specifying “non-Mercury” or “non-PCB” containing are assumed to be hazardous should they be removed.

Table 1: Summary of Findings

Hazardous Material Material Description Approximate

Quantity Asbestos No Asbestos Detected in the Building NA

Lead-Based Paint Yellow Floor Lines at Building Hangars (2) 600 LF

Mold No Visible Mold Detected in the Building NA

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB’s) Ballasts 94

Type 3 R Transformer (on pad) 1

Single Phase Transformers 4

Non- PCB Labeled Transformer 1

Mercury Interior Fluorescent Tube Light Bulbs 170

Exterior Fluorescent Light Bulbs 10

High Intensity Exterior Lights 24

High Intensity Interior Lights 14

Fire Alarm Lights 24

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC’s) HVAC Units 12

Compressors 6

Building occupant-derived waste Pull Fire Alarm 12

Fire Extinguishers (16lb tank) 8

Portable Halon Foam Tank (150lb tank) 4

Jet X Type C Foam Concentrate (300 gal tank) 2

Batteries in Fire Alarm Box 8

Thermostats (Non-Mercury) 3

Computers/Monitors 9

Emergency Exit Signs w/ Nickel Cadmium batteries 18

Cleaning Compound (D-Limonene), (55 gal drum) 4

Jet Waste Bags (20 gal drum) 1

Jet Filters (10 gal drum) 1

Paint Thinner (5 gal drum) 1

Paint Related Liquid (55 gal drum) 1

Table 1: Summary of Findings (cont.)

Hazardous Material Material Description Approximate

Quantity Storage Tanks

Underground Storage Tank (UST)- jet fuel 1,000 gal

Tank for paint, grease & sludge from jets 8,000 gal

Mobile Tanks for jet fuel (370 gal each) 2

Monitor Wells Monitor Wells (associated with 8,000 gal sludge tank) 3 wells

Note: SF = Square Feet LF = Linear Feet

This executive summary is intended solely for introductory purposes, and the information contained in this section should be used only in conjunction with the full text of this report.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

ARM Environmental Services, Inc. (ARM) has conducted a hazardous materials survey of Building 1046 (Corrosion Control Building) at McEntire Joint National Guard Base located in Eastover, SC. The hazardous materials survey included the sampling and analysis of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM), lead-based paint, as well as a visual inspection for fungi/microbial growth, moisture-impacted building materials, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) containing building materials, mercury-containing light tubes, cooling systems that may contain chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), and building occupant-derived waste (BODW). We understand the survey was requested due to the planned renovation of the building.

The hazardous materials survey was performed on November 19 and 20, 2018. The scope of work conducted included the following:

Visual inspection of the interior and exterior of Building 1046 at McEntire Joint National Guard Base located in Eastover, South Carolina, for the presence of suspect ACM, lead-based paint, mold and moisture impacted building materials, PCB-containing light building materials and light ballasts, mercury-containing light tubes and thermostats, CFC-containing refrigerant units, and BODW.

Collection and analysis of bulk samples of suspect (ACM).

Lead based paint survey was conducted using an X-Ray Fluorescent (XRF)

Analyzer.

Visual survey for suspect fungi/microbial growth.

Documentation of the number of PCB-containing light ballasts, mercury-containing fluorescent and high-intensity discharge (HID) light bulbs and thermostats, potential CFC-containing components, and BODW at the subject property.

Preparation of this report.

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

The building is a brick structure that has two hangar sections on each end and an office space in the center, all of which are connected. The total square footage is approximately 12,640 square feet in size and the building is built on a concrete slab foundation.

Interior Materials – consist of sheetrock and concrete block walls, vinyl floor tile and dropped ceiling tiles.

Exterior Materials – consist of brick exterior walls, a flat built-up roof and metal framed doors and windows.

3.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL SURVEY

The asbestos survey was conducted by Robbie Robertson; a licensed and EPA approved AHERA Asbestos Inspector. The survey was conducted on November 19 and 20, 2018 in general accordance with the sampling protocols established by EPA Regulation 40 CFR 763 Subpart E 763.86, AHERA. Site photographs taken during the survey are included as Appendix F.

3.1 Regulatory Overview

An ACM is defined as any material containing asbestos of any type in an amount greater than one percent (1%). The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and asbestos waste disposal practices. It also requires the identification and classification of existing building materials prior to demolition or renovation activity. Under NESHAP, asbestos-containing building materials are classified as either friable, Category I non-friable or Category II non-friable ACM. Friable materials are those that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Category I non friable ACM includes packing materials, gaskets, resilient floor coverings and asphalt roofing products containing more than 1 percent (%) asbestos.

Category II non-friable ACM are non-friable materials other than Category I materials that contain more than 1% asbestos.

Friable ACM, Category I and Category II non-friable ACM which is in poor condition and has become friable or which will be subjected to drilling, sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading and which could be crushed or pulverized during anticipated renovation/demolition activities are considered regulated ACM (RACM). RACM must be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Asbestos Standard for Construction Industry (29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates workplace exposure to asbestos.

The OSHA standard requires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained below 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc).The OSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities, which could disturb ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions which employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work. A full copy of the OSHA asbestos standard for general industry may be found at OSHA’s website (www.osha.gov) and should be referenced for specific information.

3.2 Visual Assessment

Our survey activities began with a visual observation of the interior and exterior of Building 1046 to identify apparent homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area consists of building materials, which appear similar throughout in terms of color, texture and date of application. Building materials which were not identified as concrete, glass, wood, masonry, metal or rubber were considered suspect ACM.

ARM lifted floor coverings in several areas, where possible, and did not observe additional flooring layers unless mentioned in this report; however, as ARM could not observe the materials beneath all floor covering in all areas, there may be isolated areas of additional suspect material present beneath existing flooring.

3.3 Physical Assessment

A physical assessment of each homogeneous area of suspect ACM was conducted to assess the friability and condition of the materials. A friable material is defined by the EPA as a material, which can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Friability was assessed by physically touching suspect materials.

3.4 Sample Collection

Based on the results of the visual sampling, bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected in general accordance with AHERA sample collection protocols. Random samples of suspect materials were collected in each homogeneous area. Bulk samples were collected using wet methods as applicable to reduce the potential for fiber release.

Samples were placed in sealable containers and labeled with unique sample numbers using an indelible marker.

The selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling was based on visual observations and the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in content. Forty-two (42) bulk samples were collected from fourteen (14) homogeneous areas of suspect ACM in the building. Sample locations are depicted on the Figure 1 Floor Plan, which is included as Appendix A.

3.5 Sample Analysis

Bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody to EMSL Analytical Inc. (EMSL) of Pineville, North Carolina for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining techniques per EPA EPA/600/R-93/116. The percentage of asbestos, where http://www.osha.gov/ applicable, was determined by microscopical visual estimation. EMSL is accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program NVLAP (#200841-0). If applicable, layered analysis of samples was conducted by the lab to separate the tile and mastic, plaster base coat and finish, layers of vinyl sheet flooring, cove base & mastic, and the drywall and joint compound.

Asbestos Sample Summary Tables of the suspect ACM samples collected during this assessment are included as Appendix B. The complete laboratory analytical results are included as Appendix C.

3.6 Results and Recommendations

Based on the results of laboratory analyses, none of the sampled building materials tested positive for asbestos at a concentration >1%.

The asbestos survey was limited to the accessible building material/components. In the event that any suspect ACM, which was not addressed in this survey is encountered, the material / component should be presumed to contain asbestos until analysis can be conducted.

4.0 LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY

4.1 Scope of the Limited Lead-Based Paint Survey

ARM personnel conducted a limited lead-based paint (LBP) survey of accessible building components on November 19 and 20, 2018. The LBP survey was conducted using a Niton XL-309 X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzer (Serial #17307) to measure the lead content of surface coatings on representative homogenous building components. A homogenous building component is a building material that is uniform in paint color, texture, and appears identical in every respect.

The sample methodology for this survey was limited in scope and generally based on the 1997 revised United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines.

HUD and EPA guidelines define lead-based paint as any paint with equal to or greater than 1.0 milligram of lead per square centimeter of painted surface (mg/cm2) when measured by X-ray Fluorescence. The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) defines lead based paint as any paint that is equal to or greater than 0.7 mg/cm2 when measured with an XRF. In this survey, the regulatory limit

(0.7 mg/cm2) established by SCDHEC was used when measured by the XRF since the structure is slated for renovation or demolition. All waste debris coated with lead-based paint equal to or greater than 0.7mg/cm2 must be disposed of in an approved Class Two (C&D) or Class Three (MSWLF) landfill or approved metal recycler. Any building components coated with paint containing lead should be handled in a manner that minimizes the exposure of building occupants or maintenance / renovation / demolition personnel to airborne lead contaminants. Interior room equivalents are identifiable parts of a building (such as a room or a hallway) and are generally listed by number, starting with the first room of the main entrance and proceeding clockwise around the building.

The main entrance of the structure was considered to be the front entrance and all walls or building components are labeled A, B, C, or D with A facing the entrance of the building and proceeding clockwise. Floor plans indicating the locations of the building components tested for LBP in the subject building are included in Appendix A of this report.

4.2 Summary of Lead-Based Paint Results

Coated surfaces on the referenced building were analyzed with the XRF. The following building components listed in Table 2 tested positive or are assumed positive for lead-based paint.

Table 2: Lead-Based Paint Material Summary

Material Description Material Location Color Material Condition

XRF Results mg/cm2

Floor Lines at Concrete Floor

Building Hangars (2)- Sides A, B, C & D

Yellow Intact 1.20 – 1.90

4.3 Lead-Based Paint Survey Results / Recommendations

Based on the XRF results, the following building components tested positive or are assumed positive for lead-based paint:

Yellow Floor Lines at Concrete Floor – Building Hangars (Sides A,B,C & D)

Building materials with lead-based paint are subject to South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control regulations pertaining to waste disposal, and to OSHA regulations pertaining to worker safety. If these building components are disturbed during renovation or demolition, contractors and workers should be informed as to the presence of lead-based paint and appropriate work practices and personal protective equipment should be used to prevent exposure to lead dust/fumes or spreading lead contamination from the work site. The building components containing lead should be disposed of in accordance with federal and state regulations.

Any building components to be removed containing equal to or greater than 0.7mg/cm lead-based paint should be disposed of in a Class II or Class III solid waste landfill or recycled by an approved metal recycler. If any paint is to be removed from the building components (chemical stripping, scraping, sandblasting, etc.) the paint residue after removal should be tested for lead using the toxic characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) to determine if the paint waste should be handled/disposed of as hazardous waste.

This survey was limited to accessible building materials tested. All painted surfaces on each building material not tested during the survey, should be presumed to contain lead-based paint until XRF or laboratory analysis can be conducted.

5.0 MOLD SURVEY

5.1 Introduction

ARM Environmental Services, Inc. (ARM) has completed a visual Mold Survey of Building 1046 at McEntire Joint National Guard Base in Eastover, SC. The purpose of the mold evaluation was to identify visible fungi/microbial growth on interior building components.

5.2 Scope of Mold Survey

ARM personnel conducted a limited mold evaluation of Building 1046 on November 19 and 20, 2018. The evaluation consisted of the following activities:

A visual reconnaissance of the subject building.

5.3 Summary of Mold Survey

No visible mold growth was observed in Building 1046.

5.4 Air and Surface Sample Results

It should be noted that no air or surface samples were collected during this mold survey.

6.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY

A visual survey was conducted for evidence of electrical components that may contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in refrigerators, freezers, heating and cooling systems, and mercury in fluorescent bulbs/switches/thermostats. The observations and findings of our hazardous materials survey are as follows:

Four (4) single phase transformers and two (2) pad-mounted transformers were observed during the survey. Only one of these transformers is labeled “non-PCB containing”. Any transformer without this label is assumed to contain PCB’s. Also, approximately ninety-four (94) Electric Light ballasts were observed in Building 1046. Based on the appearance, it is likely that the light ballasts do not contain PCB’s. However, it should be noted that these fixtures were not dissembled in order to observe the labelling. The ballasts and transformers are to be considered hazardous unless non-PCB labels are found during removal and disposal.

Removal and disposal of known or assumed PCB materials should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 761 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB’s)

Manufacturing, Processing, and Distribution in Commerce, and any state regulations that may apply.

Approximately one hundred eighty (180) Fluorescent light tubes, twenty four (24) high intensity exterior light bulbs, fourteen (14) high intensity interior light bulbs, and twenty four (24) fire alarm lights which are believed to contain mercury were documented. In the event that they would be removed, the light tubes and bulbs require special handling and recycling methods due to the presence of mercury.

The removal and disposal of mercury containing materials should comply with 40 CFR Part 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management, and any state

Twelve (12) HVAC units were observed in and around the building. Since there was no refrigerant labeling visible which substantiated the absence or presence of chlorofluorocarbons, the units are therefore assumed to contain chlorofluorocarbons (CFC’s) should they be removed. The disposal of refrigerants should be done in accordance with EPA regulations, including 40 CFR Part 82 (Protection of Stratospheric Ozone), and any state regulations that may apply.

There were three (3) thermostats (non-mercury), eighteen (18) emergency exit signs and eight (8) fire alarm batteries in the building. These and other batteries can contain Nickel Cadmium (NiCd) that are considered hazardous should they be removed. The disposal of hazardous batteries should comply with 40 CFR Part 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management, and any state regulations that may apply.

Approximately nine (9) computers/monitors are present in the building. Please note that should these be removed, the monitors and computers contain potentially harmful components such as lead, cadmium, beryllium, or brominated flame retardants. Electrical computer components require special handling and recycling methods due to the presence of these hazardous materials.

Approximately eight (8) sixteen pound dry chemical fire extinguishers are present in the building. If the fire extinguishers are removed from the building, please note that they are under pressure and contain ammonium phosphate which is known to be highly corrosive. The extinguishers would require special handling and recycling methods due to the presence of these hazardous materials.

There are four (4) 55 gal drums of cleaning compound containing D-Limonene which can be toxic causing irritation to the eyes and skin. The liquid is also flammable and requires special handling and recycling.

Other potentially hazardous materials include one (1) 55 gal drum of paint related liquid, one (1) 5 gal container of paint thinner, one (1) 10 gal drum of jet filters, and one (1) 20 gal drum of jet waste bags.

This building has a fire extinguishing foam known as Jet X- Type C High Expansion Foam Concentrate that will release from overhead dispensers should there be a fire. This foam concentrate can be toxic causing irritation to the eyes and skin.

There are two (2) Underground Storage Tanks (UST’s) on site including one (1)

1,000 gal jet fuel tank and one (1) 8,000 gal tank which contains paint, grease, and sludge from jets. There are three (3) monitor wells on site which are near the 8,000 gal UST.

There are two (2) mobile fuel tanks which contain 370 gal of jet fuel each. These are in front of Building 1046 near the flight line.

7.0 Warranty

ARM warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in general accordance with accepted professional practices as applied by similar professionals in the community at the time of its preparation. Changes in the state of the art or in applicable regulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed in this report. The field and laboratory results reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to determine the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect lead-based coated materials, asbestos containing materials, and hazardous materials at the time of the inspection. Test results are valid only for the materials tested. There is a distinct possibility that conditions may exist which could not be identified within the scope of study or which were not apparent during the site visit. This inspection covered only those materials, which were exposed and/or accessible to the inspector. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

Appendix A

Figures

Project Hazardous Materials Survey

McEntire Joint National Guard Base – Bldg. 1046 Hopkins, South Carolina

ARM Project #12-7232-18

Figure 1 Floor Plan Showing Sample Locations

= Negative Asbestos Sample = Positive Asbestos Sample

Scale

Not to Scale

Date

December 2018

N

Side A

Side C

Side D Side B

10 11

18 19 20 21

22 23 24

25 26 27

28,29,30

33 34(Roof)

35(Roof)

36(Roof)

37(Roof)

38(Roof) 39(Roof)

40 41 42

Appendix B

Asbestos Sample Summary Tables

HA

Approx.

Quantity

(ft²)

Sample

Number Description Material Location Lab Result Category

Present

Condition

1 Beige/White 12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile with mastic Throughout NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

2 Beige/White 12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile with mastic Throughout NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

3 Beige/White 12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile with mastic Throughout NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

4 Covebase Mastic (black) Throughout NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

5 Covebase Mastic (black) Throughout NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

6 Covebase Mastic (black) Throughout NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

7 Dark Beige 12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile with mastic Room 101 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

8 Dark Beige 12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile with mastic Room 101 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

9 Dark Beige 12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile with mastic Room 101 NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

10 Covebase Mastic (tan) Room 101 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

11 Covebase Mastic (tan) Room 101 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

12 Covebase Mastic (tan) Room 101 NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

13 2x4 Drywall Ceiling Panel Room 101, 109, 110 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

14 2x4 Drywall Ceiling Panel Room 101, 109, 110 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

15 2x4 Drywall Ceiling Panel Room 101, 109, 110 NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

16 2x4 Pinhole & Fissure Ceiling Tile Throughout NAD - PLM Misc Good / F

17 2x4 Pinhole & Fissure Ceiling Tile Throughout NAD - PLM Misc Good / F

18 2x4 Pinhole & Fissure Ceiling Tile Throughout NAD - PLM Misc Good / F

19 Beige Duct Mastic Room 106, 118 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

20 Beige Duct Mastic Room 106, 118 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

21 Beige Duct Mastic Room 106, 118 NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

22 Dark Tan Duct Mastic Room 118 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

23 Dark Tan Duct Mastic Room 118 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

24 Dark Tan Duct Mastic Room 118 NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

25 Drywall & Joint Compound Room 118 (Corridor) NAD - PLM Misc, SM Good / F

26 Drywall & Joint Compound Room 118 (Corridor) NAD - PLM Misc, SM Good / F

27 Drywall & Joint Compound Room 118 (Corridor) NAD - PLM Misc, SM Good / F

28 Sink Mastic Room 114 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

29 Sink Mastic Room 114 NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

30 Sink Mastic Room 114 NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

31 Boiler Tank Insulation Room 115 NAD - PLM TSI Good / F

32 Boiler Tank Insulation Room 115 NAD - PLM TSI Good / F

33 Boiler Tank Insulation Room 115 NAD - PLM TSI Good / F

34 Roof Core - Outer 1' from edge Upper Roof NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

35 Roof Core - Outer 1' from edge Upper Roof NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

36 Roof Core - Outer 1' from edge Lower Roof NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

37 Roof Core - Inner Section Upper Roof NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

38 Roof Core - Inner Section Upper Roof NAD - PLM Misc Good / NF

39 Roof Core - Inner Section Lower Roof NAD - TEM Misc Good / NF

40 Ceiling Texture Exterior Corridor NAD - PLM SM Good / F

41 Ceiling Texture Exterior Corridor NAD - PLM SM Good / F

42 Ceiling Texture Exterior Corridor NAD - PLM SM Good / F

HA-7 250 LF

HA-8 300 LF

HA-11 60 SF

HA-12 980 LF

HA-13 11,660 SF

HA-14 530 SF

HA - Homogeneous Area NAD - No Asbestos Detected PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy Chry - Chrysotile asbestos Misc - Miscellaneous Material

TEM = Transmission Electron Microscopy SM - Surfacing Material Cat I - asbestos containing packings, gaskets, asphaltic roofing products, resilient flooring, pliable mastics

SF - Square Feet LF - Linear Feet VCT - Vinyl Composition Tile F-Friable NF- Non-Friable G - Good (very localized limited damage)

D - Damaged (Damage of less than 10% distributed & less than 25% localized) SD - Significantly damaged (damage equal to or greater than 10% distributed/25% localized

HA-1 2,730 SF

HA-2 560 LF

HA-9 500 SF

HA-10 4 SF

HA-6 5,200 SF

HA-5 600 SF

HA-3 350 SF

HA-4 125 LF

Table 1 - Asbestos Sample Summary McEntire Joint National Guard Base

ARM Project # 12-7232-18

Appendix C

Analytical Results

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

10801 Southern Loop Blvd Pineville, NC 28134

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

411812184EMSL Order:

Customer ID: ARM62

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Sid Havird (803) 783-3314

Fax:ARM Environmental Services, Inc. (803) 783-2587

Received Date:1210 1st Street South Extension 11/21/2018 10:00 AM

Analysis Date:Columbia, SC 29209 11/21/2018

Collected Date: 11/20/2018

Project: McIntire AFB - Bld. 1046/ 12-7232-18

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

01-Floor Tile

411812184-0001

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

Tan/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Beige/White 12x12

VCT w/ Mastic

01-Mastic

411812184-0001A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

Cellulose<1%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Beige/White 12x12

VCT w/ Mastic

02-Floor Tile

411812184-0002

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

White/Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Beige/White 12x12

VCT w/ Mastic

02-Mastic

411812184-0002A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

89%

Cellulose1%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Beige/White 12x12

VCT w/ Mastic

411812184-0003

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Covebase (Black)

Mastic Only

411812184-0004

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Covebase (Black)

Mastic Only

07-Floor Tile

411812184-0005

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Beige 12x12

VCT w/ Mastic

07-Mastic

411812184-0005A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Beige 12x12

VCT w/ Mastic

08-Floor Tile

411812184-0006

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

Tan/White/Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Beige 12x12

VCT w/ Mastic

08-Mastic

411812184-0006A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

94%

Cellulose1%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Beige 12x12

VCT w/ Mastic

411812184-0007

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Covebase (Tan)

Mastic Only

411812184-0008

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Covebase (Tan)

Mastic Only

411812184-0009

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)84%Cellulose

Glass

15%

1%

Gray/Tan

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

2'x4' Drywall Ceiling

Panels

411812184-0010

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)89%Cellulose

Glass

10%

1%

Gray/Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2'x4' Drywall Ceiling

Panels

411812184-0011

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)88%Cellulose

Glass

10%

2%

Brown/Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2'x4' Drywall Ceiling

Panels

411812184-0012

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

27%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

50%

8%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

2'x4' Pinhole &

Fissure Ceiling Tile

Initial report from: 11/23/2018 07:43:03

Page 1 of 4ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/23/2018 7:43 AM

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

411812184EMSL Order:

Customer ID: ARM62

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

411812184-0013

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

15%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

10%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

2'x4' Pinhole &

Fissure Ceiling Tile

411812184-0014

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

15%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

10%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2'x4' Pinhole &

Fissure Ceiling Tile

411812184-0015

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

Cellulose<1%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Beige Duct Mastic

Only

411812184-0016

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

88%

Fibrous (Other)2%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Beige Duct Mastic

Only

411812184-0017

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Tan Duct Mastic

411812184-0018

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Tan Duct Mastic

25-Drywall

411812184-0019

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)89%Cellulose

Glass

10%

1%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall & Joint

Compound

25-Joint Compound

411812184-0019A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall & Joint

Compound

26-Drywall

411812184-0020

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)89%Cellulose

Glass

10%

1%

Gray

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall & Joint

Compound

26-Joint Compound

411812184-0020A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall & Joint

Compound

27-Drywall

411812184-0021

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)89%Cellulose

Glass

10%

1%

Brown/Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall & Joint

Compound

27-Joint Compound

411812184-0021A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall & Joint

Compound

411812184-0022

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

8%

84%

Cellulose8%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Sink Mastic

411812184-0023

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

70%

Cellulose15%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Sink Mastic

411812184-0024

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose10%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tank Insulation

411812184-0025

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose10%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tank Insulation

411812184-0026

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose10%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tank Insulation

34-Synthetic Layer

411812184-0027

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

5%

82%

Synthetic8%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Outer

34-Membrane

411812184-0027A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Outer

Page 2 of 4ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/23/2018 7:43 AM

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

411812184EMSL Order:

Customer ID: ARM62

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

34-Insulation

411812184-0027B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Outer

35-Synthetic Layer

411812184-0028

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

10%

80%

Synthetic5%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Outer

35-Membrane

411812184-0028A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

90%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Outer

35-Insulation

411812184-0028B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Outer

36-Insulation

411812184-0028C

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Outer

37-Glass Layer

411812184-0029

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Glass10%Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Roof Core - Inner

37-Membrane

411812184-0029A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Inner

37-Insulation

411812184-0029B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Inner

38-Glass Layer

411812184-0030

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)85%Glass15%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Inner

38-Insulation

411812184-0030A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Inner

38-Tar

411812184-0030B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Cellulose<1%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Inner

39-Insulation

411812184-0030C

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof Core - Inner

411812184-0031

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

8%

69%

Glass8%White/Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling (Exterior)

Texture

411812184-0032

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

8%

69%

Glass8%Gray/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Ceiling (Exterior)

Texture

411812184-0033

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

10%

75%

Glass5%White/Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling (Exterior)

Texture

Page 3 of 4ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/23/2018 7:43 AM

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

411812184EMSL Order:

Customer ID: ARM62

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Analyst(s)

Eric Loomis (29)

Katherine Sluder (21)

Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim

Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312

Page 4 of 4ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/23/2018 7:43 AM

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

EMSL Order: 411812184

Customer ID: ARM62

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Sid Havird Phone: (803) 783-3314

ARM Environmental Services, Inc. Fax: (803) 783-2587

1210 1st Street South Extension Received Date: 11/21/2018 10:00 AM

Columbia, SC 29209 Analysis Date: 11/24/2018

Collected Date: 11/20/2018

McIntire AFB - Bld. 1046/ 12-7232-18Project:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via

EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1

Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types

03-Floor Tile

411812184-0034

Beige/White 12x12 VCT w/ Mastic

White/Beige

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

03-Mastic

411812184-0035

Beige/White 12x12 VCT w/ Mastic

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

411812184-0036

Covebase (Black) Mastic

Only

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

09-Floor Tile

411812184-0037

Dark Beige 12x12 VCT w/

Mastic

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

09-Mastic

411812184-0038

Dark Beige 12x12 VCT w/

Mastic

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

411812184-0039

Covebase (Tan) Mastic

Only

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

411812184-0040

Beige Duct Mastic Only White

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

411812184-0041

Dark Tan Duct Mastic Tan

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

411812184-0042

Sink Mastic White

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

36-Synthetic Layer

411812184-0043

Roof Core - Outer Black

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

36-Membrane

411812184-0044

Roof Core - Outer Gray

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

39-Glass Layer

411812184-0045

Roof Core - Inner Black

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC

Initial report from: 11/24/2018 12:49:34

ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012_0002 Printed 11/24/2018 12:49:44PM Page 1 of 2

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

EMSL Order: 411812184

Customer ID: ARM62

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Sid Havird Phone: (803) 783-3314

ARM Environmental Services, Inc. Fax: (803) 783-2587

1210 1st Street South Extension Received Date: 11/21/2018 10:00 AM

Columbia, SC 29209 Analysis Date: 11/24/2018

Collected Date: 11/20/2018

McIntire AFB - Bld. 1046/ 12-7232-18Project:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via

EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1

Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types

39-Membrane

411812184-0046

Roof Core - Inner Gray

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

39-Tar

411812184-0047

Roof Core - Inner Black

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

Analyst(s)

Aaron Hartley (14) Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC

Initial report from: 11/24/2018 12:49:34

ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012_0002 Printed 11/24/2018 12:49:44PM Page 2 of 2

OrderID: 411812184

OrderID: 411812184

Appendix D

Inspectors Licenses and Certifications

Appendix E

XRF Field Data & Characteristics Sheets

Niton XLp 300, 9/24/2004, ed. 1

Performance Characteristic Sheet

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 24, 2004 EDITION NO.: 1

MANUFACTURER AND MODEL:

Make: Niton LLC

Tested Model: XLp 300

Source: 109Cd

Note: This PCS is also applicable to the equivalent model variations indicated below, for the Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, in the XLi and XLp series:

XLi 300A, XLi 301A, XLi 302A and XLi 303A.

XLp 300A, XLp 301A, XLp 302A and XLp 303A.

XLi 700A, XLi 701A, XLi 702A and XLi 703A.

XLp 700A, XLp 701A, XLp 702A, and XLp 703A.

Note: The XLi and XLp versions refer to the shape of the handle part of the instrument. The differences in the model numbers reflect other modes available, in addition to Lead-in- Paint modes. The manufacturer states that specifications for these instruments are identical for the source, detector, and detector electronics relative to the Lead-in-Paint mode.

FIELD OPERATION GUIDANCE

OPERATING PARAMETERS:

Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode.

XRF CALIBRATION CHECK LIMITS:

0.8 to 1.2 mg/cm2 (inclusive)

The calibration of the XRF instrument should be checked using the paint film nearest 1.0 mg/cm2 in the NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) used (e.g., for NIST SRM 2579, use the 1.02 mg/cm2 film).

If readings are outside the acceptable calibration check range, follow the manufacturer's instructions to bring the instruments into control before XRF testing proceeds.

SUBSTRATE CORRECTION:

For XRF results using Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, substrate correction is not needed for:

Brick, Concrete, Drywall, Metal, Plaster, and Wood

INCONCLUSIVE RANGE OR THRESHOLD:

K+L MODE

READING DESCRIPTION

SUBSTRATE THRESHOLD

(mg/cm2)

Results not corrected for substrate bias on any substrate

Brick

Concrete

Drywall

Metal

Plaster

Wood

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

EVALUATION DATA SOURCE AND DATE:

This sheet is supplemental information to be used in conjunction with Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing ("HUD Guidelines"). Performance parameters shown on this sheet are calculated from the EPA/HUD evaluation using archived building components. Testing was conducted in August 2004 on 133 testing combinations. The instruments that were used to perform the testing had new sources; one instrument’s was installed in November 2003 with 40 mCi initial strength, and the other’s was installed June 2004 with 40 mCi initial strength.

OPERATING PARAMETERS:

Performance parameters shown in this sheet are applicable only when properly operating the instrument using the manufacturer's instructions and procedures described in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines.

SUBSTRATE CORRECTION VALUE COMPUTATION:

Substrate correction is not needed for brick, concrete, drywall, metal, plaster or wood when using Lead-in- Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the normal operating mode for these instruments. If substrate correction is desired, refer to Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for guidance on correcting XRF results for substrate bias.

EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF XRF TESTING:

Randomly select ten testing combinations for retesting from each house or from two randomly selected units in multifamily housing. Use the K+L variable time mode readings.

Conduct XRF retesting at the ten testing combinations selected for retesting.

Determine if the XRF testing in the units or house passed or failed the test by applying the steps below.

Compute the Retest Tolerance Limit by the following steps:

Determine XRF results for the original and retest XRF readings. Do not correct the original or retest results for substrate bias. In single-family housing a result is defined as the average of three readings. In multifamily housing, a result is a single reading.

Therefore, there will be ten original and ten retest XRF results for each house or for the two selected units.

Calculate the average of the original XRF result and retest XRF result for each testing combination.

Square the average for each testing combination.

Add the ten squared averages together. Call this quantity C.

Multiply the number C by 0.0072. Call this quantity D.

Add the number 0.032 to D. Call this quantity E.

Take the square root of E. Call this quantity F.

Multiply F by 1.645. The result is the Retest Tolerance Limit.

Compute the average of all ten original XRF results.

Compute the average of all ten re-test XRF results.

Find the absolute difference of the two averages.

If the difference is less than the Retest Tolerance Limit, the inspection has passed the retest. If the difference of the overall averages equals or exceeds the Retest Tolerance Limit, this procedure should be repeated with ten new testing combinations. If the difference of the overall averages is equal to or greater than the Retest Tolerance Limit a second time, then the inspection should be considered deficient.

Use of this procedure is estimated to produce a spurious result approximately 1% of the time. That is, results of this procedure will call for further examination when no examination is warranted in approximately 1 out of 100 dwelling units tested.

TESTING TIMES:

For the Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the instrument continues to read until it is moved away from the testing surface, terminated by the user, or the instrument software indicates the reading is complete. The following table provides testing time information for this testing mode. The times have been adjusted for source decay, normalized to the initial source strengths as noted above. Source strength and type of substrate will affect actual testing times. At the time of testing, the instruments had source strengths of 26.6 and 36.6 mCi.

Testing Times Using K+L Reading Mode (Seconds)

All Data Median for laboratory-measured lead levels (mg/cm2)

Substrate 25th Percentile

Median 75th Percentile

Pb < 0.25 0.25 < Pb<1.0 1.0 < Pb

Wood Drywall

4 11 19 11 15 11

Metal

4 12 18 9 12 14

Brick Concrete Plaster

8 16 22 15 18 16

CLASSIFICATION RESULTS:

XRF results are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to the threshold, and negative if they are less than the threshold.

DOCUMENTATION:

A document titled Methodology for XRF Performance Characteristic Sheets provides an explanation of the statistical methodology used to construct the data in the sheets, and provides empirical results from using the recommended inconclusive ranges or thresholds for specific XRF instruments. For a copy of this document call the National Lead Information Center Clearinghouse at 1-800-424-LEAD.

This XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet was developed by the Midwest Research Institute (MRI) and QuanTech, Inc., under a contract between MRI and the XRF manufacturer. HUD has determined that the information provided here is acceptable when used as guidance in conjunction with Chapter 7, Lead-Based Paint Inspection, of HUD’s Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing.

Appendix F

Photographs

Photograph 1: View of the Corrosion Control Building (#1046) at McEntire Joint National Guard

Base in Eastover, SC where ARM performed a Hazardous Materials Survey which included hazardous materials, asbestos, mold and lead-based paint.

Photograph 2: A view of the center section of Building 1046 which is flanked by two hangars, one on each side. This center section contains offices, lockers, bathrooms, a lounge and several mechanical/electrical rooms.

Photograph 3: A view of the office area inside Building 1046 that was surveyed for hazardous materials, asbestos, mold and lead-based paint.

Photograph 4: This photo was taken inside one of the hangars. The yellow painted lines of the concrete floor tested positive for lead-based paint.

Photograph 5: High intensity lights can be found on the inside and outside of Building 1046.

These lights contain Mercury and should be handled and disposed of properly at a specialized approved recycler.

Photograph 6: This portable tank is one of several in the hangar areas which contain Halon

1211 which is nonflammable but mildly toxic. This liquefied, compressed gas stops the spread of fire by chemically disrupting combustion.

Photograph 7: There are 16lb fire extinguisers located in both hangers at Building 1046. The fire extinguishers, which are under pressure, contain ammonium phosphate which is known to be highly corrosive.

Photograph 8: This photo shows a portable tank in the hangar at Building 1046 which contains jet fuel.

Photograph 9: This photo shows a high intensity light inside the hangar which contains

Mercury. Lights which contain Mercury should be handled and disposed of properly at a specialized approved recycler.

Photograph 10: These drums contain a D-Limonene cleaning compound which can be toxic causing irritation to the eyes and skin. The liquid is also flammable and requires special handling and recycling.

Photograph 11: The fire alarm lights shown here are known to contain Mercury and should be handled and disposed of properly.

Photograph 12: Nickel Cadmium (NiCd) Batteries are found inside the exits signs throughout the building. NiCd batteries are considered a hazardous waste material and should be taken to a specialized recycling center.

Photograph 13: These batteries, which are found inside the fire alarm boxes are considered to be hazardous and should be handled and disposed of properly.

Photograph 14: This photo shows more 12 volt batteries inside the fire alarm boxes. These are also considered to be hazardous and should be handled and disposed of properly.

Photograph 15: The transformers shown here may contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) since there is no wording on the label stating otherwise. Removal and disposal of known or assumed PCB materials should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 761 Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCB’s) Manufacturing, Processing, and Distribution in Commerce, and any state

Photograph 16: The tank shown here contains Jet X- Type C High Expansion Foam Concentrate that can be toxic causing irritation to the eyes and skin. This foam solution should be handled and disposed of properly.

Photograph 17: One of the pad-mounted transformers shown here is labeled “non-PCB containing” while the other has no such wording on its label. If the wording does not exist, it must be assumed that the transformer contains PCB’s and must be handled in accordance with any state regulations that may apply.

Photograph 18: This photo shows a 1,000 gallon Underground Storage Tank (UST) located just behind Building 1046. It is understood that this tank contains jet fuel.