Asbestos and Lead Report - Basis of Design SCANG PSTE 189001.pdf

Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report

McEntire Joint National Guard

Building 958

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 1461-19-038

PREPARED FOR:

Frankfurt-Short-Bruza Associates, P.C.

5801 Broadway Extension, Suite 500

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118

(405) 840-2937

PREPARED BY:

S&ME, Inc.

134 Suber Road

Columbia, SC 29210

(803) 561-9024

September 12, 2019

ASSESSMENT PERFORMED BY:

Travis Knight, CHMM, CIEC

SCDHEC Lic. #BI-00885

Assessment date: September 4, 2019

S&ME, Inc. | 134 Suber Road | Columbia, SC 29210 | p 803.561.9024 | www.smeinc.com

September 12, 2019

Frankfurt-Short-Bruza Associates, P.C.

5801 Broadway Extension, Suite 500

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118

Attention: Mr. Fred Niggemeyer, AIA, DBIA

Reference: Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Assessment

McEntire JNGB – Building 958

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 1461-19-038

Dear Mr. Niggemeyer:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide the enclosed report detailing our asbestos and lead-based paint assessment at the referenced site. The purpose of the assessment was to identify, to the extent feasible, potential asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint (LBP) associated with the structure which is scheduled for demolition activities. Our services were performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal No. 14-

1800722R3 and our Agreement for services (AS-071), dated July 24, 2019. The following report includes the project background, sampling and analysis procedures, findings and results, and conclusions and recommendations as necessary.

This report is provided for the use of the client. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party's sole risk and S&ME, Inc. disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the assessment and of the specific areas referenced.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene/environmental services. If you have any questions concerning this report, please call us at (803) 561-9024.

Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.

Travis Knight, CHMM, CIEC Tom Behnke, PG, CHMM

Asbestos Building Inspector Environmental Services Manager

(SCDHEC Lic. No. BI-00885) (SCDHEC Lic. No. MP-00004)

Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Assessment

McEntire JNGB – Building 958

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 1461-19-038

September 12, 2019 i

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Asbestos Assessment

2.1 Purpose

2.2 Site Description

2.3 Investigative Procedures and Analysis

2.4 Assessment

2.5 Findings and Results

3.0 Lead-Based Paint Assessment

3.1 Investigative Procedures

3.2 Findings and Results

4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

5.0 Limitations

List of Tables Table I-I – Summary of Asbestos Sampling ............................................................................................. I

Appendices Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Sampling

Appendix II – Photographs

Appendix III – XRF Lead-Based Paint Reading Summary Table

Appendix IV – Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody Record

Appendix V – Copy of SCDHEC Inspectors’ Licenses

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 1461-19-038

September 12, 2019 1

Executive Summary

S&ME conducted an asbestos and lead-based paint assessment of the Logistics Readiness Flight Building

(Building 958) located on Alabama Road on the McEntire Joint National Guard Base (MCJNGB) in Hopkins, South

Carolina on September 4, 2019. The building is a single-story metal framed structure with metal siding and roofing. The structure consists of several offices, restrooms, conference room, break room, and warehouse. The structure measures approximately 3,200 square feet. The purpose of the assessment was to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint coatings associated with the structure prior to demolition activities. The structure was occupied at the time of the assessment.

Asbestos The asbestos assessment was performed in general accordance with the South Carolina Department of Health and

Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Regulation 61-86.1, Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects effective May

27, 2011 and with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and the Asbestos

Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA).

The asbestos assessment included the bulk sampling and analysis of suspect ACMs from the subject structure.

The suspect materials identified in the structure consist of drywall and associated joint compound, acoustical ceiling tile, baseboard mastic, carpet mastic, and door and window caulk.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and SCDHEC define materials as asbestos-containing if an asbestos content of greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample. Asbestos, in concentrations greater than one percent, was not identified as a result of the assessment.

Lead-Based Paint

Painted surfaces throughout the interior and exterior of the subject building were considered suspect and analyzed for lead content using an X-Ray Fluoresnce (XRF) analyzer. The coated surfaces exceeding the SCDHEC disposal criteria of 0.7 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) were considered lead-based paint for the purpose of this assessment. No tested surfaces exceeded the 0.7 mg/cm2 threshold for lead based paint or the

XRF Level of Detection limit.

This summary is for convenience only and should not be relied upon without first reading the full contents of this report, including appended materials.

1.0 Introduction

Frankfurt-Short-Bruza Associates, P.C. (FSB) retained S&ME to conduct an asbestos and lead-based paint assessment of the Logistic Flight Readiness Building (Building 958) located on Alabama Road on the McEntire

Joint National Guard Base (MCJNGB) in Hopkins, South Carolina. The assessment was performed by Travis Knight, CHMM, CIEC, of S&ME on September 4, 2019. Mr. Knight is an Asbestos Building Inspector licensed by the South

Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC). An Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) is defined by State and Federal regulations as a building material containing greater than one percent (>1%) of one

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 1461-19-038

September 12, 2019 2 of the six asbestos minerals regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

This asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal No.

14-1800722R3, dated July 24, 2019 and SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1.

Demolition and renovation activities in public and commercial buildings are regulated by OSHA, EPA and SCDHEC.

The EPA and SCDHEC require asbestos assessments, conducted by licensed individuals, prior to renovation and/or demolition projects. Code 40 of Federal Regulations Part 61, Subpart M, Final Rule, National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 require asbestos assessments, followed by the proper removal, and disposal of ACM that is affected by renovation or demolition. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos.

Identification of ACM is also required by OSHA 1926.1101. The EPA, OSHA and SCDHEC define ACM as materials containing greater than one (1) percent asbestos in a representative sample. However, OSHA also regulates materials containing less than or equal to one percent asbestos.

2.0 Asbestos Assessment

2.1 Purpose

The purpose of the asbestos assessment was to identify the presence and quantity of asbestos-containing materials associated with the interior and exterior of the subject structure prior to demolition activities. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40 Code of the Federal Regulations, part 61, and State Regulation 61-86.1 enforced by the SCDHEC, along with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926 enforced by OSHA.

2.2 Site Description

Building 958 is a single-story metal framed structure with metal siding and metal roof. The structure is approximately 3,200 square feet. The structure consists of several offices, conference room, restrooms, breakroom, and warehouse. We understand the structure is scheduled for demolition activities. The structure was occupied at the time of the assessment.

The following sections describe the assessment procedures used, results of the suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed, and conclusions and recommendations regarding the subject site as related to ACMs.

2.3 Investigative Procedures and Analysis

A visual assessment of the referenced structure was performed to determine the homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspect ACMs. Based on EPA definitions used in the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), 40 CFR

763, an HA of suspect asbestos-containing building material has the same color and texture and is thought to be installed within the same timeframe. S&ME assessed the interior and exterior of the structure, including roofing materials for suspect ACMs, surfacing materials, and miscellaneous materials. Significant destructive investigative

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 1461-19-038

September 12, 2019 3 techniques and sampling were not performed as part of this assessment. Consequently, the possibility exists that suspect materials were not detected in inaccessible areas such as flooring overlays, pipe chases, locked rooms, or wall voids or in areas deemed unsafe to enter by the asbestos inspectors. If additional suspect materials are discovered during future renovation or demolition activities, bulk samples should be collected and analyzed for asbestos content.

Suspect flooring materials identified in the structure consist of carpet mastic. Suspect surfacing materials consisted of joint compound associated with drywall system. No suspect TSI was observed. Additional suspect

ACMs that were observed and sampled include drywall, baseboard mastic, acoustical ceiling tiles, and exterior caulking.

A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials in accordance with OSHA, SCDHEC and EPA. Bulk samples were then extracted from the suspect ACMs, recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to S&ME’s Analytical asbestos laboratory and EMSL Analytical’s asbestos laboratory in Pineville, North Carolina for analysis via the following methods:

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I (1-1-87 edition), Part

763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based on six optical characteristics:

morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of elongation and dispersion staining colors.

The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

In accordance with SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) confirmation analysis is required to be performed on one sample of any non-friable organically bound material (NOB) that tests negative via PLM analysis. The TEM analysis was performed using EPA 600 Method in accordance with ASTM E2356.

Both the PLM and the TEM laboratories are accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation

Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

2.4 Assessment

Identified ACMs were assessed based on the observed condition (good, damaged or significantly damaged) and potential for disturbance. Identified ACMs were also categorized based on the EPA’s NESHAP regulation categories. A friable ACM is classified as an ACM that can be crumbled to a powder by moderate hand pressure.

A non-friable ACM is classified as either Category I or Category II non-friable ACM. Category I and Category II non-friable ACMs are distinguished from each other by their fiber release potential when damaged. Generally, Category I non-friable ACM, which by definition includes intact asbestos-containing roofing materials, gaskets, packing, and resilient floor coverings is less likely to become friable and release fibers in a damaged state.

Category II non-friable ACM include all other non-friable ACMs excluding Category I that have a high probability of being rendered friable during removal activities or demolition. All friable ACM, Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 1461-19-038

September 12, 2019 4 abrading, or Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations are considered to be a Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM).

2.5 Findings and Results

The asbestos assessment conducted on September 4, 2019 included the quantification and random bulk sampling of various suspect asbestos-containing materials located on the interior and exterior of the subject structure. Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed during this assessment, asbestos in concentrations >1% was not identified.

A material with an asbestos content less than or equal to one percent is not classified as an ACM applicable to

EPA and SCDHEC; however, trace levels of asbestos (less than one percent) in a material is subject to OSHA regulatory requirements in 29 CFR 1926.1101, to include, but not limited to, worker protection, using wet methods, proper clean-up, use of proper tools/equipment, engineering controls, etc.

In accordance with SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, TEM analysis was performed on one sample of each of the non-friable, organically-bound (NOB) materials that displayed a result of no asbestos detected or less than 1% asbestos via PLM analysis. NOBs consist of materials such as vinyl floor tiles, vinyl baseboards and mastics. Please refer to Table I-I in Appendix I for more detail regarding which samples of NOB materials were submitted for TEM analysis. The TEM analysis confirmed that no asbestos is present in the samples that were analyzed at concentrations >1%.

Photographs of site conditions are provided in Appendix II. The laboratory reports are provided in Appendix IV.

3.0 Lead-Based Paint Assessment

3.1 Investigative Procedures

The lead-based paint assessment was conducted for compliance with the SCDHEC limit of 0.7 milligrams (mg) of lead per square centimeter (cm2) of painted surface for lead-based paint coated waste. SCDHEC, Health Division defines lead-based paint as a coating containing lead in quantities ≥0.7 mg/cm2 (SCDHEC, Health Division definition #4-53-1320f). Any coated surfaces meeting or exceeding the SCDHEC limit of 0.7 mg/cm2 were considered lead-based paint for the purpose of this assessment.

OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the presence or absence of lead.

The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of thirty micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (30 µg/m3) during an eight-hour day and a permissible exposure level of fifty micrograms per cubic meter (50 µg/m3).

Representative covered building components and surfaces were analyzed utilizing a Niton XLp-300A X-Ray

Fluorescence (XRF) spectrum analyzer (serial #95004). The suspect painted finishes were selected based on the color of the topcoat and the underlying paint layers and/or the substrate on which it was applied. The possibility

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 1461-19-038

September 12, 2019 5 exists that lead-based paint finishes are present in inaccessible areas not tested such as pipe chases, wall voids, etc.

Attached in Appendix III is a summary of the paint readings analyzed by the XRF spectrum lead analyzer. The XRF summary provides the sample numbers, sample location, component, substrate, paint color, condition, and results.

3.2 Findings and Results

Coated surfaces throughout the interior and exterior of the subject structure were tested for the presence of lead-based paint. Coated surfaces meeting or exceeding the SCDHEC limit of 0.7 milligrams of lead per square centimeter (0.7 mg/cm2) were considered lead-based paint for the purpose of this assessment. No tested surfaces exceeded the 0.7 mg/cm2 for lead based paint or the XRF Level of Detection limit.

4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The asbestos and lead-based paint assessment conducted on Building 958 located on Alabama Road at MCJNGB in Hopkins, South Carolina did not identify the presence of asbestos-containing materials or lead-based paint. If additional suspect ACMs not included in this report are discovered and will be disturbed by the renovation/demolition activities, bulk samples must be collected by a licensed asbestos inspector and analyzed for asbestos content, prior to disturbance of the suspect material(s).

SCDHEC requires a 10-working day written notification including submittal of this asbestos assessment report prior to building demolition. This report should be provided to contractors and design entities associated with the building demolition to ensure compliance with SCDHEC requirements for building demolitions.

5.0 Limitations

This report is provided for the sole use of the Client. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party’s sole risk, and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling period and of the specific areas referenced. Under no circumstances is this report to be used as a bidding document, or as a project design or specification for removal of ACM.

S&ME performed the services in accordance with generally accepted practices of reputable environmental consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. S&ME has endeavored to meet this standard of care. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is intended or made with respect to this report or S&ME’s services. Users of this report should consider the scope and limitations related to these services when developing opinions as to risks associated with the site. Additional limitations to our survey are as follows:

Significant destructive sampling was not performed during the asbestos assessment. Additional suspect

ACMs may be present in inaccessible locations such as in wall voids, pipe chases or flooring overlays.

Consequently, if additional suspect materials are discovered during future renovation or demolition activities, bulk samples must be collected and analyzed for asbestos content.

Appendices

Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Sampling

Summary of Asbestos Sampling

Project Name: McEntire JNGB – Building 958 Project Number: 1461-19-038

Location: Hopkins, South Carolina Sampling Date(s): September 4, 2019

NAD = No Asbestos Detected NA = Not Applicable SF = Square feet LF = Linear feet CF = Cubic Feet

1Category: F = Friable I = Category I, Non-Friable II= Category II, Non-Friable

2Type; Misc. = Miscellaneous Surf. = Surfacing TSI = Thermal System Insulation

3Condition: Good, Damaged or Significantly Damaged Accessible during renovation or demolition with Potential for Disturbance; Low or High

4Sample analyzed by TEM

Quantities are approximate and should not be used for cost estimates or bidding purposes.

Table I-I – Summary of Asbestos Sampling

HOMOGENEOUS AREA SAMPLE DATA

HA

Area

Material

Description Material Location Quantity

1Cat

(F/I/II)

2Type

3Condition /

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample

Number Sample Location

Percent and

Type

Asbestos

DW Drywall Throughout 4,300 SF NA Misc. NA/NA

DW-1 N. Side Conf. Room NAD

DW-2 Break Room NAD

DW-3 Front Office NAD

JC Joint compound Drywall system throughout 4,300 SF NA Surf. NA/NA

JC-1 N. Side Conf. Room NAD

JC-2 Break Room NAD

JC-3 Supply Room NAD

JC-4 Back Office NAD

JC-5 Front Office NAD

JC-6 Ladies’ Restroom NAD

JC-7 Men’s Restroom NAD

CT 2’x4’ Ceiling Tile Throughout (except warehouse) 2,800 SF NA Misc. NA/NA

CT-1 N. Side Conf. Room NAD

CT-2 Hallway NAD

CT-3 Ladies’ Restroom NAD

BBM

Tan baseboard mastic

Throughout (except restrooms and warehouse)

1,000 LF NA Misc. NA/NA

BBM-1 Break Room NAD

BBM-2 Front Office NAD

4BB-3 Rear Office NAD

CM Tan Carpet Mastic Office area 2,800 SF NA Misc. NA/NA CM-1 Break Room NAD

CM-2 N. Side Conf. Room NAD

Summary of Asbestos Sampling

Project Name: McEntire JNGB – Building 958 Project Number: 1461-19-038

Location: Hopkins, South Carolina Sampling Date(s): September 4, 2019

NAD = No Asbestos Detected NA = Not Applicable SF = Square feet LF = Linear feet CF = Cubic Feet

1Category: F = Friable I = Category I, Non-Friable II= Category II, Non-Friable

2Type; Misc. = Miscellaneous Surf. = Surfacing TSI = Thermal System Insulation

3Condition: Good, Damaged or Significantly Damaged Accessible during renovation or demolition with Potential for Disturbance; Low or High

4Sample analyzed by TEM

Quantities are approximate and should not be used for cost estimates or bidding purposes.

HOMOGENEOUS AREA SAMPLE DATA

HA

Area

Material

Description Material Location Quantity

1Cat

(F/I/II)

2Type

3Condition /

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample

Number Sample Location

Percent and

Type

Asbestos

4CM-3 Hallway NAD

C Gray Caulk Exterior Windows &

Doors 300 LF NA Misc. NA/NA

C-1 Exterior Window NAD

C-2 Exterior Door NAD

4C-3 Exterior Window NAD

Abbreviations and Hazard Assessment Key

In accordance with the EPA and SCDHEC, a confirmed ACM is assigned a hazard assessment based on its present condition and potential for disturbance. The hazard assessment is used as a tool for prioritization in remedial actions regarding any identified ACM(s). The following key exhibits the criteria that compose the hazard assessment.

Present Condition

F = Friable G = Good (Very localized limited damage)

NF = Non-friable D = Damaged (Damage of less than 10% distributed and less than 25% localized)

SD = Significantly Damaged (Damage equal to or greater than 10% distributed, 25% localized)

Potential for Future Disturbance

LPD = Low Potential for Disturbance (Contact, Vibration, and Air Erosion all of Low Concern)

PD = Potential for Disturbance (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of Moderate Concern)

SPD = Significant Potential for Disturbance (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of High Concern)

Hazard Assessment

Significantly

Damaged

(SD)

Damaged

(D)

Good

(G)

SPD PD LPD SPD PD LPD

7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Appendix II – Photographs

Site Photographs

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project 1461-19-038

Taken by: TK Date: September 4, 2019

1 General view of the subject structure. 2 General view of the office area of the building. Drywall and joint compound tested negative for asbestos.

3 The acoustical ceiling tiles tested negative for asbestos. 4 View of the warehouse portion of the building.

Site Photographs

Hopkins, South Carolina

S&ME Project 1461-19-038

Taken by: TK Date: September 4, 2019

5 View of non-suspect fiberglass insulation located in the warehouse walls. 6 View of the placard indicating the building is designated as

Building 958.

No Photograph

7 Sign indicating that the building is also identified as the Logistics Readiness Flight Building. 8

Appendix III – XRF Lead-Based Paint Reading Summary Table

Serial #95004

PAINT

Site: McEntire Bldg. 958 Date: September 4, 2019 Ranges (NEG<INC<POS): Device PCS

Reading

Number Floor/Area Room Feature Substrate Condition Color Result

XRF

Reading

(mg/cm²)

1 Shutter Cailbration --

2 Calibrate 1.00

3 Calibrate 1.00

4 Calibrate 1.10

5 Interior North Side - Conf. Room Door Metal Non-Det. Tan Negative <LOD

6 Interior North Side - Conf. Room Door Frame Metal Non-Det. Tan Negative <LOD

7 Interior North Side - Conf. Room Wall Drywall Non-Det. White Negative <LOD

8 Interior Supply Closet Wall Drywall Non-Det. White Negative <LOD

9 Interior Office Exterior Door Metal Non-Det. Gray Negative <LOD

10 Interior Office Wall Drywall Non-Det. White Negative <LOD

11 Interior Hallway Door Metal Non-Det. Black Negative <LOD

12 Interior Hallway Door Frame Metal Non-Det. Tan Negative <LOD

13 Interior Office Wall Drywall Non-Det. White Negative <LOD

14 Interior Ladies Restroom Baseboard Ceramic Non-Det. White Negative <LOD

15 Interior Men's Restroom Wall Drywall Non-Det. White Negative <LOD

16 Interior Warehouse I-Beam Metal Non-Det. Red Negative <LOD

17 Interior Warehouse I-Beam Metal Non-Det. Red Negative <LOD

18 Exterior Exterior Siding Metal Non-Det. Tan Negative <LOD

19 Exterior Exterior Door Metal Non-Det. Gray Negative <LOD

20 Exterior Exterior Rollup door Metal Non-Det. Gray Negative <LOD

21 Exterior Exterior Window Metal Non-Det. Black Negative <LOD

22 Post Calibrate 0.90

23 Post Calibrate 1.00

24 Post Calibrate 1.00

*Note: Condition = Deteriorated (Det.) or Non-Deteriorated (Non-Det.)

Project No.: 1461-19-038

XRF LEAD-BASED PAINT READING SUMMARY TABLE

*Note: LOD = Level of Detection

1 of 1 Page 344 of 355

Appendix IV – Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis Sheets and Chain of

Custody Record

Columbia Branch 134 Suber Rd.

Columbia SC 29210

Asbestos Analysis Summary

Client Job

Client Name

Date Analyzed

Date Received

9/5/2019

9/5/2019

McEntire Bldg 958

9771D Southern Pine Boulevard

Charlotte, NC 28273

704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929

NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 1461-19-038

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

80 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

18 GYPSUM19-5052 DW-1 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

2 GLASS

<1 CELLULOSE

98 GYPSUM19-5053 DW-2 BEIGE FIBROUS ND

5 CELLULOSE 95 GYPSUM19-5054 DW-3 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5055 JC-1 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane Wasilewski Laboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 1461-19-038

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER19-5056 JC-2 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5057 JC-3 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5058 JC-4 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5059 JC-5 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5060 JC-6 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5061 JC-7 TAN NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 1461-19-038

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

60 CELLULOSE

5 MINERAL WOOL

35 PERLITE19-5062 CT-1 GREY FIBROUS ND

60 CELLULOSE

5 MINERAL WOOL

35 PERLITE19-5063 CT-2 GREY FIBROUS ND

60 CELLULOSE

5 MINERAL WOOL

35 PERLITE19-5064 CT-3 GREY FIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5065 BBM-1 TAN NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5066 BBM-2 TAN NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5068 CM-1 TAN NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 1461-19-038

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER19-5069 CM-2 TAN NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-5071 C-1 GREY PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER19-5072 C-2 GREY PLIABLE ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

10801 Southern Loop Blvd Pineville, NC 28134

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

EMSL Order: 411908847

Customer ID: SMEI54

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Jane Wasilewski Phone: (704) 940-1830

S&ME, Inc. Fax: (704) 565-4929

9771D Southern Pine Blvd. Received Date: 09/06/2019 11:15 AM

Charlotte, NC 28273 Analysis Date: 09/10/2019

Collected Date:

1461-19-038Project:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via

EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1

Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types

BBM-3

411908847-0001

Mastic Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

CM-3

411908847-0002

Mastic Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

C-3

411908847-0003

Caulk Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

Analyst(s)

Aaron Hartley (3) Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC

Initial report from: 09/10/2019 09:15:24

ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012_0002 Printed 9/10/2019 9:15:26AM Page 1 of 1Page 352 of 355

OrderID: 411908847

Appendix V – Copy of SCDHEC Inspectors’ Licenses

S&ME, Inc. | 134 Suber Road | Columbia, SC 29210 | p 803.561.9024 | www.smeinc.com

South Carolina Department of

Health and Environmental Control

Asbestos License

Travis L. Knight