Solicitation Amendment 2 - W31P4Q26RA0020002.pdf

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL

BUSINESS (WOSB)

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

1. REQUISITION NUMBER PAGE 1 OF

2. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE

DATE

4. ORDER NUMBER 5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE

DATE

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 8. OFFER DUE DATE/

LOCAL TIME

9. ISSUED BY

13b. RATING

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

CODE

15. DELIVER TO 16. ADMINISTERED BY CODE

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE17a. CONTRACTOR/

OFFEROR

CODE

FACILITY

CODE

CODE

TELEPHONE NUMBER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT SUCH ADDRESS IN

OFFER

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a UNLESS BLOCK

BELOW IS CHECKED

REQUEST

FOR QUOTE

(RFQ)

INVITATION

FOR BID

(IFB)

REQUEST

FOR

PROPOSAL

(RFP)

SEE ADDENDUM

19.

ITEM NUMBER

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY

22.

UNIT

23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

(Use Reverse and/or Attach Additional Sheets as Necessary)

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA 26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Government Use Only)

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH

AND DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND

ON ANY ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS

SPECIFIED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REFERENCE OFFER

DATED . . YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 30c. DATE SIGNED

31a. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 31c. DATE SIGNED

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 11/2021)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

10. THIS ACQUISITION IS UNRESTRICTED OR

NORTH AMERICAN

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION

STANDARD (NAICS):

SIZE STANDARD:

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

RATED ORDER UNDER

THE DEFENSE PRIORITIES

AND ALLOCATIONS

SYSTEM - DPAS (15 CFR 700)

SET ASIDE: % FOR:

11. DELIVERY FOR FREE ON

BOARD (FOB) DESTINATION

UNLESS BLOCK IS MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

12. DISCOUNT TERMS

ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE (FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION) FAR 52.212-1, 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3

AND 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED. ADDENDA

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA

8(A)

ECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL

BUSINESS (EDWOSB)

SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

(SDVOSB)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SMALL BUSINESS

NOTE: OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30.

SEE CONTINUATION

SEE CONTINUATION

W31P4Q26RA0020002 31 JUL 2026

STEPHANIE LAMBERT

(520) 674-8075

18 SEP 2026

05:00 PM

W31P4Q 100

W6QK ACC-RSA

AMCOM CONTRACTING CENTER MISSLE, REDSTONE ARSENAL AL 35898-

REDSTONE ARSENAL, AL 35898-5090

UNITED STATES

STEPHANIE LAMBERT, EMAIL: STEPHANIE.L.LAMBERT14.CIV@ARMY.MIL

541614

USD 20,000,000.00

DO-A2

SEE SCHEDULE

Amendment 2 - Questions and Answers are cutoff as of 28 Aug 2026, 5:00PM CST. Questions submitted after the cutoff date/time will not be answered. Questions submitted before the 28 Aug 2026, 5:00PM CST cutoff will be answered and posted on SAM.gov in a forthcoming amendment.

The following documents have been updated/uploaded in attachments:

Attachment 0001 PWS Performance Work Statement

Attachment 0002 Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Attachment 0003 (CUI) AH-64 APACHE ATTACK HELICOPTER (AAH) SCG-27 JUL 22

Attachment 0004 WD 2015-5229 Rev29 (05-13-2026) El Paso TX

Attachment 0005 PWS Attachment 1_ Appendices A-E

Attachment 0006 PWS Attachment 2_Appendix F

Attachment 0007 PWS Attachment 3_Appendix G

Attachment 0008 PWS Attachment 4_Appendix H (Must be requested per amendment 1)

Attachment 0009 PWS Attachment 5_Appendix H (2) (Must be requested per amendment 1)

Attachment 0010 PWS Attachment 6_Appendix I (Must be requested per amendment 1)

Amendment 1 - Updated to extend the proposal due date to 18 Sep 2026 and attach SOW Appendices.

Note: Appendix I cannot be posted to sam.gov and, if needed, must be requested via email to the POCs identified on this solicitation. If approved, Appendix I will be delivered via a secure site.

Appendix H will also need to be requested. It was uploaded in error.

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation Preamble

W31P4Q26RA0020002

(i) This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial services prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

(ii) The solicitation number is W31P4Q-26-R-A002 and is issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP).

(iii) The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Regulation.

(iv) Set-Aside Status: 100% Small Business Set-Aside - SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (SDVOSB) . NAICS Code: 541614 Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services.

(v) Line Items:

(vi) Description of Requirements: The Contractor shall provide logistical management, supply chain analysis, and personnel to support aircraft and missile systems in accordance with the attached Performance Work Statement

(PWS).

*** END OF NARRATIVE ***

The attachments listed in this Section are incorporated by reference and made part of this contract with the same force and effect as if included in full text.

The attachments listed in this Section are incorporated by reference and made part of this contract with the same force and effect as if included in full text.

The attachments listed in this Section are incorporated by reference and made part of this contract with the same force and effect as if included in full text.

*** END OF NARRATIVE ***

1. General Submission Requirements

Offerors shall submit proposals electronically via email to jill.g.freeman.civ@army.mil and stephanie.l.lambert14.

civ@army.mil no later than September 18, 2026, 5:00PM CST. Proposals shall consist of five (5) separate volumes.

Emails shall not exceed 15MB per message. Offerors may send multiple emails if necessary (e.g., 'Email 1 of 3').

Volumes I, II, III, and IV should be submitted as searchable Adobe PDF files. Volume V (Price) shall be submitted as an MS Excel file with all formulas intact.

In accordance with FAR 52.212-1(b), the offeror shall submit a cover document and administrative package that includes:

Proposals shall be organized into the following five (5) separate Volumes:

Volume Title Page Limit

Volume 1 Technical Capability Gateway Maximum 10 Pages (excluding resumes)

Volume 2 Technical / Risk Maximum 10 Pages (excluding crosswalks/matrices)

Volume 3 Management Maximum 15 Pages (excluding resumes and letters of commitment)

Volume 4 Past Performance Maximum 5 Pages

Volume 5 Price No Page Limit

NOTE: This section provides explicit instructions for preparing and submitting a complete and compliant proposal. The burden of submitting a thorough and accurate proposal rests solely with the offeror. Failure to follow these instructions may result in the proposal being deemed non-compliant and therefore ineligible for award. By submitting a proposal, the offeror agrees that its proposal shall remain valid for a minimum of 180 calendar days from the proposal submission deadline.

2. PROPOSAL FILES

1. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and Request for Proposal (RFP) number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

a. Margins Top, Bottom, Left, Right 1"

b. Gutter 0"

c. From Edge Header, Footer 0.5"

d. Page Size, Width 8.5"

e. Page Size, Height 11"

The following additional restrictions apply:

3. VOLUME 1: Technical Capability Gateway (Maximum 10 Pages, excluding resumes) This volume is an initial screening. Offerors shall not submit elaborate management plans. Volume 1 shall be limited to:

1. Corporate Capability Statement: A concise summary demonstrating the offeror's ability to execute the SCOS PWS requirements.

2. Key Personnel Resumes: Commercial-format resumes (max 2 pages each) for the proposed Program Manager and Lead Logistics Analyst.

3. Transition Plan: A brief timeline demonstrating the ability to fully staff and assume SCOS operations within 30 days of contract award.

4. VOLUME 2: Technical/Risk

This volume is comprised of two (2) subfactors. The Offeror shall provide information to demonstrate their technical competence and understanding of the requirement using customary commercial practices. Offerors shall organize their Volume 2 into the following subfactors and key points:

Subfactor 1: Technical Approach and Scenario Responses

Offerors shall provide documentation demonstrating the adequacy of their commercial approach and addressing any associated performance risk. This section must include:

1. Key Point 1: Technical Approach Narrative: A comprehensive narrative detailing the offeror's technical approach to executing the PWS requirements.

2. Key Point 2: Commercial Feasibility Plan: A detailed plan demonstrating how the offeror will accomplish the PWS requirements utilizing customary commercial practices, tools, and methodologies.

3. Key Point 3: Scenario Responses: Offerors shall provide comprehensive and specific responses detailing how they would apply customary commercial practices, tools, and methodologies to solve the following six (6) operational scenarios:

a. Scenario 1: Commercial Logistics Process Optimization: Demonstrate industry best practices for achieving supply chain efficiency.

b. Scenario 2: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) / LMP Integration for Inventory Integrity: Demonstrate the ability to maintain data integrity between your commercial inventory practices and the Government's SAP-based Logistics Modernization Program (LMP).

c. Scenario 3: Commercial Forecasting and Predictive Demand Planning: Detail your approach to anticipating and planning for supply demands.

d. Scenario 4: Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Proactive Supply Chain Risk Mitigation: Describe how you will utilize commercial AI/Machine Learning (ML) capabilities to identify and mitigate risks.

e. Scenario 5: Operational Continuity and Staffing Under Pressure: Demonstrate commercial surge capacity and rapid response capabilities during high-pressure or continuity-of-operations events.

f. Scenario 6: Commercial Cybersecurity and Data Protection in Austere Environments: Detail the application of standard commercial cyber frameworks (e.g., NIST/ISO) to protect data in deployed or austere settings.

4. Key Point 4: PWS Compliance Matrix: A cross-reference index matrix that maps the proposal's technical approach directly to the specific paragraphs of the PWS.

5. Key Point 5: Government-Furnished Property (GFP) List: A complete list of any GFP required for performance that is in addition to what is already identified in the PWS baseline. If no additional GFP is required, an explicit statement to that effect must be included.

Subfactor 2: Workforce Qualifications

Offerors shall demonstrate their ability to provide a qualified workforce that possesses the necessary commercial education, experience, and credentials to execute the PWS requirements. This section must include:

1. Key Point 1: Commercial Labor Categories: If the offeror is proposing commercial labor categories or qualifications that differ from those provided in Appendix C of the PWS, provide a copy of the commercial job classification guide.

2. Key Point 2: Qualifications Crosswalk: A clear, self-sufficient crosswalk matrix mapping the Offeror's proposed personnel qualifications and commercial labor categories directly to the specific requirements outlined in the PWS.

5. VOLUME 3: Management

This volume evaluates the offeror's organizational structure, governance, and resource management. NO COST DATA shall be included.

1. Management & Execution Plan: A narrative addressing the plan for managing the contract, organizational charts, a description of commercial task management systems, and a plan for integrating subcontractors.

2. Personnel Management Plan: The corporate approach to recruiting, training, and retaining qualified personnel for the full contract duration, including standard commercial employee benefits. (Required for prime and all major subcontractors).

3. Certifications: A written certification, signed by an authorized corporate official, stating that all proposed personnel meet or exceed PWS qualifications.

4. Letters of Commitment: For any proposed Key Personnel not currently employed by the offeror or a teaming partner. All salary information must be redacted. (Excluded from page count).

5. Management Scenario-based Questions (Offerors must provide comprehensive responses to the following):

a. Key Personnel Management (PWS 2.5.5): Scenario: Three months into the contract, your proposed Site Operations Manager for Fort Bliss resigns. Question: Describe your immediate containment plan to ensure uninterrupted operations and your long-term strategy for identifying, vetting, and onboarding a qualified replacement without degrading performance.

b. Strategic Recruitment and Retention (PWS 2.5.3): Scenario: The labor market for cleared logisticians with LMP experience is highly competitive. Question: Beyond a standard benefits package, what specific, innovative strategies will you implement to recruit and retain your qualified personnel for the full five-year contract?

c. Subcontractor Cost and Performance Control (PWS 2.5.2): Scenario: A major subcontractor is experiencing performance issues and cost overruns on their fixed-price labor. Question: Detail the steps your Program Manager would take to address this, including your cost control procedures and contractual remedies, to mitigate impacts on the Government.

d. Quality Control and Process Improvement (PWS 3.9): Scenario: After six months, customer satisfaction reports (PWS 3.2.4) indicate a decline in order fulfillment accuracy. Question: Describe how your Quality Control Program would identify the root cause of this issue and what steps you would take to implement and monitor a corrective action plan to restore and improve performance.

e. Contract Transition Management (PWS 4.13): Scenario: You are the incoming contractor.

Question: Provide a detailed plan for the 30-day transition-in period that ensures a seamless transfer of responsibilities from the incumbent, including knowledge transfer, joint inventories, and establishing operational control without any disruption to mission support.

f. Government Property Management (PWS 2.5.6): Scenario: During a Government-led audit, a significant discrepancy is found between the property book records and the physical inventory of Government Furnished Property (GFP) at Building 722, Fort Bliss. Question: As the primary hand receipt holder, describe the immediate actions you would take to investigate this discrepancy, your process for reporting the loss in PIEE, and the corrective measures you would implement in your property control system to prevent recurrence.

6. VOLUME 4: Past Performance Provide up to three (3) references for commercial or government contracts performed within the last three (3) years that are similar in size, scope, and complexity (defined as logistics support exceeding $3M annually or demonstrating equivalent multi-site operational scale). This volume shall be organized into the following sections:

1. Section 1 - Contracts Descriptions.

a. Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and DUNS Number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).

b. Government contracting activity, and current address, Procuring Contracting Officer's name, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

c. Government's technical representative/Contracting Officer's Representative and current email address, telephone, and fax numbers.

d. Government contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officer's name, and current e-mail address, telephone, and fax number.

e. Government contract administration activity's Pre-Award Monitor's name, and current e-mail address, telephone, and fax numbers.

f. Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Delivery Order Numbers.

g. Contract Type (specific type such as Fixed-Price (FP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time & Material (T&M), etc.). In the case of Indefinite Delivery contracts, indicate specific type (Requirements, Definite Quantity, and Indefinite Quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M, etc.).

h. Awarded price/cost.

i. Final or projected final price/cost.

j. Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion or work.

k. Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

2. Section 2 - Performance.

a. For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The offerors shall also provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror or proposed subcontractor.

The offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.

b. For all contracts, the offeror shall provide data on all manufacturing warranty returns. Data shall delineate total number of warranty returns, number of Could Not Duplicate (CND), number of failures attributable to GFE component failures, and number and nature of failures attributable to the offeror's delivered product.

3. Section 3 - Subcontracts. Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the offeror's corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, DUNS Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government PWS subparagraph number. This includes all subcontractors who will be providing critical hardware/services or whose subcontract is for more than %10 of the total proposed cost/price.

This section will further include written consent of major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of their subcontractor's past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors

4. Section 4 - New Corporate Entities. New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving their offices and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited. Information should be included in the files described in the sections above. Letters of Commitment shall be included in the proposal for these employees in order to be considered.

5. Past Performance Questionnaire. For all contracts identified in Section 1, Contract Descriptions, a Past Performance Questionnaire must be completed and submitted. The offeror shall complete Part I of the Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail the questionnaire to both the Government contracting activity and technical representative responsible for the past/current contract. The POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Office no later than the proposal due date, to jill.g.freeman.civ@army.mil. The offeror shall e-mail to the Contracting Officer a list of all the POCs who were sent a questionnaire. The Government must receive this list no later than the proposal due date. The POC List shall be submitted in Word for Windows Table Format to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name; Contract Number; Government Agency;

POC Last Name, First Name; POC Title; POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E-Mail to POC (month/day).

6. Submissions. Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractor's facility, i.

e., in case an offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement. Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency POCs in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs in situations described above.

Note. The Government may use both independently obtained data and information provided by the offeror to evaluate past performance. The Government will not cross-reference other proposal volumes to obtain required information, nor will it seek out additional data to address deficiencies. The responsibility for submitting a complete and acceptable proposal rests solely with the offeror. Proposals that do not include the required information may be rejected.

7. VOLUME 5: Price

Submit a comprehensive pricing spreadsheet. Certified Cost or Pricing Data is NOT required and shall not WARNING:

be submitted.

1. Mandatory Plug-In Values: Offerors shall include the exact unburdened amounts below in their price proposal:

a. CLIN 1005 (Material AWFC Missiles): $27,500.00

b. CLIN 1006 (Travel - Missiles): $6,000.00

c. CLIN 1007 (Other Direct Costs (ODCs) Missiles): $88,500.00

d. CLIN 1013 (Material AWFC Aviation): $27,500.00

e. CLIN 1014 (Travel Aviation): $6,000.00

f. CLIN 1015 (Other Direct Costs (ODCs) Aviation): $88,500.00

2. Prohibition on Indirect Rates, Profit, and Fee: All Government-provided NTE plug-in amounts (CLINs 1005, 1006, 1007, 1013, 1014, and 1015) are strictly unburdened. Offerors shall apply any indirect rates not (including, but not limited to, G&A, Material Handling, or Subcontract Administration burdens) to these NTE amounts. Additionally, offerors shall apply any profit or fee to these amounts. The exact unburdened not amounts listed above must be integrated into the price proposal without modification.

3. Total Evaluated Price: Offerors must roll up the exact, unburdened value of these plug-in CLINs into their Total Proposed Price. Failure to use the exact Government-provided base plug-in amounts may result in the proposal being deemed non-compliant and excluded from further consideration.

*** END OF NARRATIVE ***

1. BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation volumes and subfactors described below.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions. The Government reserves the right to make an award based upon the Price volume (Volume 5) in the event that the Technical/Risk, Management, and Past Performance evaluation results of all the offerors' proposals are substantially the same.

2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY

Evaluation of the offeror's proposal shall address each volume, qualitative subfactor, and scenario-based question as it applies to the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The Government will first evaluate Volume 1: Technical Capability Gateway on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. Proposals evaluated as "Unacceptable" under Volume 1 will not be evaluated further and are ineligible for award.

For those proposals determined to be "Acceptable" under Volume 1, the Government will assign each Technical/Risk and Management subfactor an adjectival rating and write a narrative evaluation reflecting the identified strengths, weaknesses, and risks.

3. Evaluation Volumes

The following volumes will be used to evaluate offers.

Volume Title Evaluation Type

Volume 1 Technical Capability Gateway

Acceptable/Unacceptable (Pass /Fail)

Volume 2 Technical / Risk Adjectival Rating

Volume 3 Management Adjectival Rating

Volume 4 Past Performance Confidence Assessment

Volume 5 Price Completeness and Reasonableness

VOLUME 1: Technical Capability Gateway (Acceptable/Unacceptable)

This volume is evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. To receive an "Acceptable" rating and proceed to further evaluation, the offeror must submit:

VOLUME 2: Technical/Risk

Subfactor 1: Technical Approach and Scenario Responses: The Government will evaluate the adequacy and risk of the Offeror's technical approach narrative, commercial feasibility plan, Government-Furnished Property (GFP) List, and PWS Compliance Matrix for a clear understanding of the requirement. Special emphasis will be placed on the feasibility, innovation, and risk associated with the Offeror's responses to the six (6) Scenario Responses (Commercial Logistics Process Optimization, ERP/LMP Integration, Commercial Forecasting, AI Implementation, Operational Continuity, and Commercial Cybersecurity).

Subfactor 2: Workforce Qualifications: The Government will evaluate the Commercial Labor Categories and Qualifications Crosswalk to determine the Offeror's ability to provide a qualified workforce that possesses the necessary commercial education, experience, and credentials mapped directly to the PWS requirements.

In accordance with the Army Source Selection Supplement (AS3), Section 3.1, the Army methodology for evaluating Technical Approach and Related Risk is the Combined Technical/Risk Rating, (see Table 1 below). This methodology considers risk, in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings.

TABLE 1 - COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is not awardable.

VOLUME 3: Management The Government will evaluate the soundness of the Offeror's organizational structure, governance, and resource management.

In accordance with the Army Source Selection Supplement (AS3), Section 3.1, the Army methodology for evaluating Technical Approach and Related Risk is the Combined Technical/Risk Rating, (see Table 1 below). This methodology considers risk, in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings.

TABLE 1 - COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is not awardable.

VOLUME 4: Past Performance

The Government will evaluate the offeror's record of recent and relevant performance. The past performance factor considers each offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract requirements. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality.

1. RECENCY: The first aspect is to evaluate the recency of the offeror's past performance. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information.

2. RELEVANCY: The second aspect is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. Relevancy is not separately rated; however, the following criteria (see Table 2) will be used to establish what is relevant which shall include similarity of service /support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and degree of subcontract/teaming.

Table 2 - Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

3. QUALITY ASSESSMENT: The third aspect assesses the overall quality of the offeror's past performance.

Documented results from Past Performance Questionnaires, interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment.

Performance Confidence Assessment: Utilize the Performance Confidence Assessment (see Table 3 below) to select the most appropriate confidence level for each Offeror. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance, or for whom information is not available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably and will receive a "Neutral Confidence" rating.

TABLE 3 - Performance Confidence Assessments

Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the facto of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

VOLUME 5: Price

Price will be evaluated for reasonableness and completeness. The Government will verify that the Offeror's Total Evaluated Price accurately incorporates the exact, unburdened Mandatory Plug-In Values for CLINs 1005, 1006, 1007, 1013, 1014, and 1015 without the unauthorized application of indirect rates, profit, or fee.

Over and Above CLINs (Evaluation Purposes Only): The mandatory plug-in values specified for CLINs 1005, 1006, 1007, 1013, 1014, and 1015 are established strictly for evaluation and price-modeling purposes to ensure a fair and common basis for proposal evaluation. These CLINs will be formally established as "Over and Above" CLINs at contract award. Actual work orders, tasks, or services under these CLINs will be negotiated, authorized, and funded on an as-needed basis during contract performance in accordance with the contract's Over and Above procedures.

4. TRADE-OFF METHODOLOGY

Among those offerors rated "Acceptable" under Volume 1 (Technical Capability Gateway), a trade-off may be made between the qualitative, non-price volumes (Volumes 2, 3, and 4) and the Price volume (Volume 5).

The relative importance of the evaluation volumes is established as follows:

Volume 2 (Technical/Risk) and Volume 3 (Management) are of equal importance to one another.

As proposals become more equal in their non-price ratings (Volumes 2, 3, and 4), the evaluated price (Volume 5) becomes more significant in the source selection decision.

*** END OF NARRATIVE ***