ENCL_1_-TSHS_SOW__MAR07.pdf

09 March 2017 W31P4Q-16-R-0010 i

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR THE

PROCUREMENT OF

TARGET SYSTEMS HARDWARE

AND SUPPORT

(TSHS)

Prepared By

SFAE-STRI-ITTS-Q

Targets Management Office (TMO), Project Manager for Instrumentation, Targets, Threat Simulators and SOF Training Systems (PM ITTS), Program Executive Officer for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation (PEO

STRI)

Redstone Arsenal, AL ii

Approval Page

This document provides the Statement of Work for an Target System and Hardware Support

(TSHS)

CONCURRENCE BY:

Eric Hoffman Project Director, Targets Management Office

Robbin Finley Lead Project Director, Targets Management Office

Bruce Truog Deputy Director, Targets Management Office

Alvin Brown Director, Targets Management Office iii

Table of Contents

1. SCOPE

1.1 Project Objective

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

3. REQUIREMENTS

3.1 General Requirements

3.1.1. Task Orders

3.1.2 Subcontract Activity

3.1.3 Contract Manpower Reporting (CMR)

3.2 Specific Requirements

3.2.1 Target Systems Engineering Services

3.2.2 Target Systems Data Base Management

3.2.3 Target Systems Technical Administrative Support

3.2.4 Target Systems and Component Procurement

3.2.5 Travel

3.3 Engineering Services Memorandum……………………………………………………..28

1. SCOPE

This Statement of Work provides for:

a. Target Systems Engineering Services

b. Target Systems Database Management

c. Target Systems Technical Administrative Support

d. Target Systems and Component Procurement

e. Travel

1.1 Project Objective

The United States Army Program Executive Officer for Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation’s (PEO STRI), Project Manager for Instrumentation, Targets, Threat Simulators and SOF Training Systems (PM ITTS), Targets Management Office (TMO) provides realistic, inexpensive targets to the Army, other Services, and Allied Nation users to support research and development, test and training tracking, live fire, and simulated live fire engagements at DoD ranges and military installations.

Targets will support testing requirements for multiple weapons systems, on-going development efforts and training missions. The TMO requires multiple realistic range target presentations/scenarios to best support United States or Allied forces in the Continental United States (CONUS) and Outside CONUS (OCONUS).

1.2 Background

In order to support testing of weapon systems and training of soldiers, targetry is required. Many targets that are available within the Department of Defense (DoD) are too expensive to employ as live fire targets. Other existing target systems available within the DoD do not adequately represent range target appearances, signatures, or performance characteristics to be successfully employed as surrogate or decoy range targets.

The target hardware to be provided under this contract may be existing off-the-shelf proprietary equipment and/or new hardware developed using Task Orders (TOs). Target hardware includes complete systems, reconfigured subsystems, support equipment, and new hardware which may be a form, fit, and function replacement of existing parts.

This statement of work (SOW) defines the engineering services, data base management, and technical administrative support required to support targetry efforts at ranges in both the United States and Allied Nations. The target system and component requirements include procurement of Target Systems, including targets, support equipment, and system parts and components for use/installation on test and training ranges as well as the transportation of items. This SOW will not replace any existing contract within TMO.

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Applicable top level documents are contained in the Contract Document Summary List (DSL) by number, title, and date. The document versions specified on the DSL take precedence over the generic references (without revision letters) cited in the SOW.

3. REQUIREMENTS

3.1 General Requirements

The Contractor shall provide for engineering services, data base management, technical administrative support, target system and component procurement and contractor travel to support TMO targetry efforts at ranges in both the United States and Allied Nations. The target system and component requirements include procurement of Target Systems, including targets, support equipment, and system parts and components for use/ installation on test and training ranges. All optional efforts under this SOW will be defined in Task Orders (TOs) defining end items needed, with schedule and performance criteria.

3.1.1. Task Orders

All efforts performed by the Contractor under this SOW shall be provided IAW the TOs issued and this SOW. TOs issued by the Government to the Contractor will specify cost, schedule and performance requirements.

3.1.1.1 The Contractor shall under the terms, conditions, and provisions set forth herein, furnish sufficient personnel labor (for engineering services, data base management, and technical administrative support), target system and component procurement and travel to accomplish work in accordance with this SOW.

3.1.1.2 The Government may originate new TOs at any time during the contract ordering periods.

3.1.1.3 The Contractor shall identify a single point of contact (POC) who will be responsible for coordinating with the Contracting Officer’s Technical

Representative (COTR) and other Government counterparts (program management, contracting, budget/billing, etc.) for this SOW and subsequent task orders.

3.1.1.4 Documentation

3.1.1.4.1 The Contractor shall prepare test plans IAW DI-NDTI-80566 (See CDRL A006), and test reports IAW DI-NDTI-80809 (See CDRL A012) as specified in each TO for any tests conducted to support Engineering Service requirements in this SOW paragraph.

3.1.1.4.2 Commercial engineering drawings shall be prepared IAW DI- SESS-81003(See CDRL A019) and MIL-STD-31000 when required by a TO.

Commercial technical manuals shall be prepared IAW-DI-TMSS-80527 (See CDRL A005) when required by a TO.

3.1.1.4.3 At the completion of all TOs, the Contractor shall prepare a final report, IAW DI-MGMT-80061 (See CDRL A001), which includes a description of the task(s), total resources expended, schedules (proposed and actual), description of significant events (problems encountered, resolution, tests conducted, major findings), and disposition of the task(s) (cancelled, completed, carried forward to another TO).

3.1.1.5 TOs issued under this SOW may contain either Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Firm Fixed Price and Cost No Fee (CNF).

3.1.1.5.1 All labor will be CPFF hourly rates for each labor category.

Normal duty hours are Monday through Friday, eight hours per day. In the event that overtime hours are required, they shall be preapproved by the Contracting Officer (KO) for each TO. See Attachment A for all labor categories.

3.1.1.5.2 Target system and component procurements will be CNF or

FFP. Each TO will have a Not to Exceed (NTE) amount identified for target system and component procurements.

3.1.1.5.3 Travel expenditures will be CNF.

3.1.1.5.4 For CNF CLINs, the Contractor shall not expend funds on a TO beyond the original cost prior to Government approval of a revision establishing a new estimated cost. The Contractor shall notify the Government when 75% of the funds allocated to the TO have been expended.

3.1.2 Subcontract Activity

The Contractor will be given subcontracting authority for any/all systems, parts or accessories needed to perform services under this SOW. Subcontracting may be required to obtain proprietary targeting equipment and services. The Contractor shall obtain Government approval prior to acquiring services/supplies for subcontracts.

3.1.3 Contract Manpower Reporting (CMR)

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for the TO via a secure data collection site. The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields using the following web address:

http:/www.ecmra.mil/. Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance during each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs October 1 through September 30. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than October 31 of the each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to the help desk at help desk at:

http://www.ecmra.mil/.

3.2 Specific Requirements

3.2.1 Target Systems Engineering Services

The Contractor shall provide Engineering Service support for Target Systems to improve the capability of the system. This support covers a variety of areas such as program management, test and evaluation management, analysis, training, financial management, quality assurance management, configuration management, safety management, security management, environmental management, information assurance and logistical support. The Contractor shall resolve deficiencies identified in the operation and support of the system and provide development and testing of Target System requirements identified by the Government during the period of contract execution. See Appendix A for labor

3.2.1.1 Program Management

3.2.1.1.1 Except where specifically stated as Government furnished, the Contractor shall provide all personnel, materials, and services to plan, organize, control, staff, report, and direct program efforts required by this

SOW.

3.2.1.1.2 Within thirty days of contract award, and within thirty days following the issuance of each contract TO, the Contractor shall conduct a program review for the Government in which the Contractor’s program management team, program plan, resource projections, and product development plans for execution of the required effort are presented.

When multiple TOs are awarded concurrently, the Contractor may combine the review of individual TOs into a single meeting, or consecutive series of meetings, to reduce the impact on both Government and Contractor personnel.

3.2.1.1.3 The Contractor shall establish an Integrated Product Team (IPT) including both Contractor and Government project management personnel under the technical liaison clause of this contract. IPT meetings may be scheduled by the Contractor on a scheduled or “as required” basis to maintain oversight and control of the project, but shall be conducted at least once every quarter. The Contractor shall coordinate participation of its personnel and subcontractor personnel for IPT meetings. The Government will coordinate participation of its personnel for IPT meetings.

Government representatives participating in IPT meetings may include Government contracted technical and management support Contractor personnel. Non-government parties having access to the Contractor’s nonpublic technical data or computer software on the Government’s behalf will be subject to DFARS 252.227-7025 or individual nondisclosure agreements with the Contractor. IPT meeting locations will be scheduled at the discretion of the Government at either the Government site on Redstone Arsenal, AL, or at the Contractor’s site so as to best support the ongoing activity of the project. The Government may schedule additional meetings of the IPT to address specific project areas or resolve areas of concern as they arise. However, no more than six (6) additional, unscheduled IPT meetings per year will be called by the Government. IPT meetings will be used to share information on ongoing project activities, update members on project progress toward completion of scheduled activities, identify and resolve issues within the project, and facilitate cooperation in accomplishing project objectives. Participation in formal IPT meetings and Program Management Reviews will be in addition to daily personal, telephonic, and electronic coordination between the Contractor and the Government to ensure that project objectives are accomplished in a timely and cost effective manner and that challenges are identified and resolved as early and efficiently as practical.

3.2.1.2 Test and Evaluation Management

3.2.1.2.1 The Contractor shall plan and conduct testing of all Target Systems parts, components, subassemblies, software, and end items modified, replaced, or redesigned under this contract to demonstrate the capability of the modified Target Systems to continue to accomplish all system requirements contained in Section 3.1 of this SOW. The Government shall be allowed to review all test plans and procedures and to observe the conduct of all test activities performed. The Contractor shall document and deliver to the Government IAW DI-QCIC-80553 (See CDRL A006) and DI-MISC-80508 (See CDRL A003) the test plans, test procedures, test execution records, the results of all tests, and analysis proving how the Target system under test accomplished the performance requirements.

3.2.1.2.2 Verification

3.2.1.2.2.1 Quality Conformance. The existing capabilities of the Target Systems procured or developed under this contract may be verified as outlined below for any modifications from the system design proposed by the Contractor under this contract at the direction of the Government. When directed by the Government, the Contractor shall prepare a test plan in accordance with DI-QCIC-80553 (See CDRL A006) and a report in accordance with DI-MISC-80508 (See CDRL A003) indicating the results of the verification effort. The test plan shall have a section addressing the inspection, demonstration, and analysis methodology to be utilized for the verification/acceptance of the component changes and a section addressing production inspection and verification.

3.2.1.2.3 Definitions

a. Inspection: Review of hardware, software, and documentation that results in verification that the required feature or performance has been obtained.

b. Demonstration: A qualitative verification method, accomplished without elaborate instrumentation or special equipment.

c. Analysis: A quantitative verification method based on evaluation of collected or measured data.

3.2.1.3 Analysis

3.2.1.3.1 The Contractor shall analyze design deficiencies, performance issues, and issues related to design and operational procedure modifications to improve performance and serviceability of Range Target systems, support equipment (SE), ancillary equipment (AE), or other related technical areas when directed by the Government per individual TOs.

3.2.1.3.2 The Contractor shall provide target engineering services in support of weapon system test and evaluation programs, training programs, research and development activities, and unique target missions. These services shall require tasks to be performed at the Contractor’s facilities, as well as field modifications and testing at various ranges within the continental

United States (CONUS) and outside of the continental United States

(OCONUS).

3.2.1.3.3 The Contractor shall furnish sufficient personnel, labor, equipment, supplies, materials, engineering and other services to accomplish work IAW this SOW and resulting TOs.

3.2.1.3.4 The Contractor shall not duplicate any work required by any other Government contract.

3.2.1.3.5 Meetings, to include In-process Reviews (IPRs), may be requested by the Contractor or called by the Government to coordinate activities required by the contract. The Government and the Contractor shall mutually agree to the meeting date and proposed agenda.

3.2.1.3.6 The Contractor shall conduct an engineering program that evaluates and improves the Target System devices and support equipment as defined by TO. The engineering support shall consist of design, documentation, Engineering Change Proposals (ECP), prototype fabrication, testing, integration, evaluation, and reporting. The Contractor shall perform the following engineering tasks:

3.2.1.3.6.1 Evaluation and correction of Target System hardware deficiencies discovered during field operation. For deficiencies that have explosive and/or hazardous components, the testing shall be performed using DoD Ammunitions and Explosives Hazard Classification Procedures, TB 700-2 for reference and information only, and data shall be prepared IAW DI-SAFT-81299 (See CDRL A024).

3.2.1.3.6.2 Technical engineering, field support for field testing and demonstration, range testing and demonstration of Target Systems and support equipment.

3.2.1.3.6.3 Assessment and evaluation of target systems devices, i.e., signature augmentation, operation, recovery, improvements, and other Target Systems modifications and associated hardware.

3.2.1.3.6.4 The Contractor shall maintain design, development, and fabrication of hardware for field operation and testing. This shall include integration of Target Systems hardware into new, modified, and existing hardware.

3.2.1.3.6.5 The Contractor shall design, develop, modify and test software resident in Target Systems, support equipment, and Target Systems remote control systems to various locations IAW Di-IPSC-81488 (See CDRL A029). These software efforts would be intended to overcome deficiencies identified during field operations, enable new target capabilities, or retain compatibility with Government or commercial software packages used in the Range Target systems.

3.2.1.3.6.6 The Contractor shall provide coordination and technical support to other activities, to include US Government (DoD, Navy, USMC, and Air Force) and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) programs involving Target Systems, devices, and support equipment.

3.2.1.3.6.7 The Contractor shall identify, investigate, and evaluate COTS technologies that are candidates to resolve Target Systems deficiencies.

3.2.1.3.6.8 The Contractor shall ensure that the inherent safety designed into the target system is not degraded by the addition of new Target Systems equipment or other modifications resulting from TO completion. Significant changes to the system that affect the inherent safety designed into the system shall be documented in an update to the existing Range Target System Safety Assessment Report (SAR) IAW DI- SAFT-80102 (See CDRL A003) or the development of a new Target System SAR IAW DI-SAFT-80102 (See CDRL A003).

3.2.1.3.6.9 The Contractor shall maintain an accident prevention program during all Target Systems operations to ensure that Government assets and the public are protected from damage and injury. Reports of accident/incidents shall be prepared IAW DI-SAFT-81563 (See CDRL A030) and coordinated with the Government Technical Representative, appropriate Government range safety personnel, TMO, and AMCOM Safety Office as appropriate. Initial reporting of any accident or incident shall be in person, if the Government Technical Representative is on site, or by a telephone call to the Government Technical Representative.

3.2.1.3.6.10 The Contractor shall be required to perform testing on modifications of systems/subsystems involving energetic materials not previously approved through a DoD agency. For CONUS locations, it is anticipated to occur at test ranges such as but not limited to White Sands Missile Range, NM, and Eglin Air Force Base, FL. For OCONUS locations, the test location will be identified in the specific TO.

3.2.1.3.6.11 The Contractor shall provide reproduction of existing technical data applicable to work performed under this SOW IAW DI- EDRS-80940 (See CDRL A017) when requested by the Government.

3.2.1.3.6.12 Configuration Documentation (CD)

3.2.1.3.6.12.1 Commercial Drawing shall be used IAW DI-SESS-

81003(See CDRL A019) to satisfy the configuration documentation requirements of this statement of work. Commercial Drawings or existing data used shall be such that every line, number, letter, and character is clearly legible.

3.2.1.3.6.12.2 Purchase Parts Identification. The Contractor shall identify all purchased parts (other than Military Standard parts) by either a Government format vendor item drawing (formerly specification control drawing) or by manufacturer’s Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and vendor part number in the appropriate assembly parts list. Vendor items include altered items and selected items.

3.2.1.4 Training

3.2.1.4.1 The Contractor shall provide training in the operation and maintenance of range targetry systems provided to post, camps, stations, and ranges worldwide that will be operated and maintained by the gaining organization following installation. Training shall consist of all information necessary to set up equipment, operate equipment, maintain equipment, and replace equipment components that become inoperable during use.

3.2.1.4.2 When directed by the Government, the Contractor shall prepare a training plan IAW DI-SESS-81958 (See CDRL A033) and training materials IAW DI-ILSS-80872 (See CDRL A014) to be presented to the intended trainees for the system to be trained. Training materials may be required in the native language of the host nation personnel receiving the training.

3.2.1.4.3 When directed by the Government, the Contractor shall present the approved training program to the target audience. Training presentation will be observed by Government representatives to ensure that the training audience is properly qualified in the operation and maintenance of the equipment being provided.

3.2.1.5 Financial Management

Performance and Cost Reports. The Contractor shall prepare a Performance and Cost Report IAW DI-FNCL-80912 (See CDRL A015) for each cost reimbursable CLIN awarded under this contract. The report shall address the cost and work status of each cost element of the TSHS effort by TO.

3.2.1.6 Quality Assurance Management

The Contractor shall provide Quality Assurance (QA) technical expertise to include the utilization of QA management and technical principals, inspection techniques, and other analytical and empirical tools during the development and production of systems/subsystems/components.

The Contractor shall implement and maintain a quality system that meets the requirements of ANSI/ASQC/Q9001/ISO/Q9001/Q10012-1, AS9100, or propose an equivalent system. The Contractor's quality procedures, planning and all other documentation and data that comprise the quality system (for both hardware and software) shall be made available for Government review throughout the contract.

3.2.1.6.1 Quality System Plan (QSP)

The Contractor shall provide its QSP IAW DI-QCIC-81379 (See CDRL A025). The Contractor’s QSP shall describe in detail the approach to implement and maintain a basic quality system that meets the requirements of ANSI/ASQC/Q9001/ISO/Q9001/Q10012-1, AS9100, or equivalent. The QSP shall provide for controls of process and product characteristics and include criteria and methodology that are used to validate conformance to performance specifications and to achieve functional areas in the design, test, production, and management processes. If the Contractor proposes to use a quality system that has not been approved under the Department of Defense Common Process (or Standard Process) Initiatives for DoD contracts, the description shall address at least the following 20 elements: management responsibility;

quality system; contract review; design control; document and data control; purchasing; control of customer supplied product; product identification and traceability; process control; inspection and test status;

control of inspection, measuring and test equipment; inspection and test status; control of nonconforming product; corrective and preventive action;

handling, storage, packaging, preservation, and delivery; control of quality records; internal quality audits; training; servicing; and statistical techniques.

The QSP shall also include a description of the Contractor’s

• Electrostatic Discharge Protection,

• Quality Assurance Provisions,

• Product Acceptance System and validation methodology,

• Environmental Stress Screening, and

• Special Test/Inspection Equipment and validation methodology.

3.2.1.6.2 Parts, Materials, and Processes (PMP) Control Program. The Contractor shall submit a PMP Control Program Plan as part of the QSP IAW DI-SDMP-81748 (See CDRL A032). The PMP Control Program Plan shall include a description of the methods of process controls, documentation, and verification of continued process improvement, and the controls and policies for the following subjects as applicable:

• Parts selection and qualification

• Parts survivability

• Parts approval

• Approved parts list

• Parts control

• Supplier selection

• Supplier management

• Parts screening

• Parts documentation

• Parts quality

• Parts validation

• Plastic encapsulated devices

• COTS selection and qualification

• Obsolete parts/diminishing manufacturing sources and material shortages-test analysis requirements to assure piece parts/materials specification compliance for parts procured non-compliant to Government or DoD-adopted industry standards, including custom parts

• Printed wiring assembly (PWA) design and component mounting processes

• Electrostatic discharge control

• Maintenance and equipment used for electronic manufacturing processes

• Process controls, workmanship methodologies and procedures

• Training/proficiency of the workforce

• Rework and repair of PWAs and cable assemblies

3.2.1.6.3 Electronics Fabrication Procedures. Processes utilized for the manufacture and repair of electronic hardware will produce assemblies and equipment that meet the system performance requirements. The Contractor’s electronic fabrication plan shall describe the materials, methods, and verification criteria for producing quality electrical interconnections and assemblies and shall utilize process control methodologies for the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the fabrication process. The Contractor shall use IPC/EIA J-STD- 001, Class 3 as guidance in developing this plan. Plans will be reviewed and approved by Government in accordance with QSP IAW DI-QCIC-81379 (See

CDRL A025).

3.2.1.6.4 Test Plans. The Contractor shall prepare and submit acceptance test plans IAW DI-NDTI-80566 (See CDRL A006) and acceptance test reports IAW DI-NDTI-80809 (See CDRL A012) for Government approval. For any product or service provided under this contract, the Contractor shall make all test plans and reports available for Government review and verification.

3.2.1.6.5 Validation of Special Inspection/Test Equipment. Inspection and test equipment used to verify acceptance criteria specified in the controlling document shall require validation. The Contractor shall verify that the Special Inspection Equipment will perform the function for which it has been designed and shall perform an equipment validation/proofing. The validation/proofing shall be in accordance with Contractor developed instructions and shall assure acceptance of known good hardware and the rejection of hardware with known faults. The Government reserves the right to witness the validation/proofing activities. Any change that invalidates the original criteria may require revalidation. Final approval for use of Special Inspection/Test Equipment rests with the Government.

3.2.1.6.6 Quality Accreditation Programs. A contractor with an

ANSI/ASQC/Q9001/ISO/Q9001/Q10012-1, AS9100, third party registration (through a registrar accredited by the Registrar's Accreditation Board) may submit the scope of the registration as evidence of the Contractor’s compliance to the basic quality system requirements or a Contractor may submit evidence of DOD approval of a Common Process or Standard Process Initiative for its basic quality system. If the Contractor furnishes either of the cited documents as evidence of meeting the basic quality requirements, the overall QSP shall address as a minimum the requirements of the PMP Control Program and the Electronic Fabrication Procedures sections of this document.

3.2.1.7 Configuration Management (CM)

3.2.1.7.1 The contractor shall implement a CM program to manage the configurations provided under this contract. The contractor shall prepare a configuration management plan IAW DI-CMAN-80858 (See CDRL A013), using MIL-HDBK61 as a guide. The contractor’s configuration management process shall include the procedures for identification, preparation, reviewing, auditing, releasing, controlling, changing, and providing the status of all technical data.

3.2.1.7.2 Configuration Administration. The contractor shall designate a single point of contact that shall be the technical authority and have the program responsibility for all functions related to the CM. The contractor CM designee shall document and maintain configuration items to maximize identification, definition and control.

3.2.1.7.3 Configuration Identification. The contractor shall implement a

Performance Data Management (PDM) system that shall control the configuration of all components and interfaces.

3.2.1.7.4 Functional Baseline. The contractor shall prepare changes to a functional baseline IAW DI-SDMP-81465 (See CDRL A028).

3.2.1.7.5 Allocated Baseline. The contractor shall prepare changes to the allocated baseline. The Allocated Baseline consists of the SRSs, IDDs, and

SDDs. Once Government has formally approved the changes, the Allocated Baseline shall be under formal contractor configuration control under formal contractor control IAW the CMP.

3.2.1.7.6 Product Baseline. The contractor shall develop changes to the product baselines that include the production documentation and engineering drawings, assembly drawings, software source and executable code and integration procedures for each CI IAW with control para below. The Contractor shall prepare all new or revised Product Drawings and Associated Lists for the as detail, assembly, installation, control, interface, electrical and special application drawings as defined in ASME-Y14.24, IAW DI-SESS- 81000 (See CDRL A018).

3.2.1.7.7 Interface Changes. The contractor shall identify all system level interface requirements and prepare an ICD list IAW DI-CMAN-81248 (See CDRL A022). The contractor shall define and control all interface requirements and ensure compatibility and interoperability for hardware and software components IAW requirements described in System Specification.

3.2.1.7.8 Configuration Control. The contractor shall recommend changes to controlled documentation IAW DI-CMAN-80639 (See CDRL A008), DI- CMAN-80640 (See CDRL A009), DI-CMAN-80641 (See CDRL A010) and DI- CMAN-80642 (See CDRL A011). Any changes that impact ICDs, or other controlled documentation shall not be implemented by the contractor without prior contractual change. Any proposed contract action that impacts current or future production and /or operational support costs shall contain life cycle cost justification. Contractor recommended changes to the product baseline shall be submitted following the PCA.

3.2.1.7.9 Configuration Status Accounting (CSA). The Contractor shall maintain current and historical records for the baseline technical data, change and nonconformance actions, and new and updated documentation, including identification of all as-designed and as-built configurations. The Contractor shall prepare CSA information IAW DI-CMAN-81253 (See CDRL A023) for the “as-built” record.

3.2.1.7.9.1 A copy of the Contractor’s production performance specifications, drawings, and process control specifications shall be available to the Government for inspection and review IAW DI-CMAN- 81253 (See CDRL A023).

3.2.1.7.9.2 The Contractor shall do an internal release of the functional, allocated, and product baselines and imbedded spare/repair parts documentation. A copy of these documents will be provided to the Government IAW DI-CMAN-81121 (See CDRL A021).

3.2.1.7.10 Configuration Audits. Using MIL-HDBK-61 for guidance and information, the contractor shall conduct Functional and Physical Configuration Audits (FCA/PCA) for the hardware/software and interfaces IAW the Contractor’s CMP and resolve any reported discrepancies. The Contractor shall support Government participation in selected Audits and prepare a Configuration Audit Summary Report to record and report the result of each audit to include the status and final disposition of identified discrepancies IAW DI-CMAN-81022 (See CDRL A020).

3.2.1.7.11 Configuration forms

3.2.1.7.11.1 Performance based product / process specifications. New specifications shall be prepared IAW with DI-SDMP-81465 (See CDRL A028) and MIL-STD-961. Specifications shall be prepared to the lowest level of the work breakdown structure necessary to adequately define the system/ equipment.

3.2.1.7.11.2 Engineering drawings and associated lists. Engineering drawings and associated lists shall be prepared IAW DI-SESS-81000 (See CDRL A018) and MIL STD-31000.

3.2.1.7.12 Contractor Assurances

3.2.1.7.12.1 The Contractor shall assure that all hardware has been built or acquired to the configuration documentation, to include changes, furnished to the Government under this contract.

3.2.1.7.12.2 The Contractor shall assure that the contract

documentation prepared in accordance with this contract, together with the existing data utilized in performing this contract, discloses complete design, engineering, logistics, procurement and manufacturing requirements and quality assurance provisions applicable to the material and software for which effort is required under this contract.

3.2.1.8 Safety Management

3.2.1.8.1 System Safety Program. The Contractor shall establish and implement a System Safety Program (SSP). The Contractor shall establish and execute a hazard identification and mitigation effort using Task 101 of MIL-STD-882, Standard Practice for System Safety, as a guide. The Contractor shall document the system safety effort in a System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) using Task 102 of MIL-STD-882 and DI-SAFT-81626 (See CDRL A031).

3.2.1.8.2 Risk Analysis. The Contractor shall use Section 4, MIL-STD-882 for development of a risk matrix, hazard severity levels, and probability levels.

3.2.1.8.3 Integrated Product Team / Working Group Support. The

Contractor shall implement a System Safety integrated product team / working group using MIL-STD-882 Task 105 as a guide.

3.2.1.8.4 Hazard Tracking System. The Contractor shall implement a hazard tracking system using MIL-STD-882, Task 106, as a guide as needed.

3.2.1.8.5 Accident Investigation and Reporting. Reports of accidents / incidents shall be coordinated with the TMO Technical Representative, local Range Safety personnel at the mission site, and the AMCOM Safety Office.

Immediate reporting shall be by telephone call to the TMO Technical Representative and in person or by telephone/radio to the local Range Safety personnel. The TMO Technical Representative will provide notification to the AMCOM Safety Office (ASMSA-SF). Investigation and reporting of all remotely piloted vehicle target accidents shall be accomplished using Army Regulation 385-40 and in accordance with DI-SAFT-81563 (See CDRL A030).

3.2.1.8.6 Hazard Analysis. The Contractor shall conduct a system hazard analysis using MIL-STD-882, Task 203, 204, 205, 206, and 208 for guidance.

3.2.1.8.7 Safety Assessment Report. The Contractor shall prepare and implement a Safety Assessment Report using MIL-STD-882 as a guide and in accordance with DI-SAFT-80102 (See CDRL A003).

3.2.1.8.8 Safety during Mission Support. The Contractor shall comply with all safety procedures and practices set out herein during exercises or mission support activities at host installations/ranges. The Contractor shall provide safety designees as required by range safety regulations and range user documentation for the host range.

3.2.1.8.9 Electrical Storm Safety. In the event of an impending electrical storm, within five miles and incoming, the Contractor shall cease operations and all personnel shall evacuate the area as directed by the Government customer.

3.2.1.8.10 Motor Vehicle Regulations Compliance. Contractor personnel assigned to operate motor vehicles shall comply with regulations pertaining to motor vehicle operation, security, law enforcement, fire prevention, safety and accident prevention, and Range Target Systems range safety requirements established by the individual ranges/sites. Commercial interstate ground transportation shall be conducted in compliance with Department of Transportation requirements for personnel, equipment and cargo.

3.2.1.8.11 Contractor Safety Officers. The Contractor shall

provide/designate primary and alternate safety officers as required by range safety regulations and range user documentation. These individuals shall be familiar with Range Target Systems initiation procedures and operations and shall be responsible to range safety personnel for safe operating procedures.

3.2.1.8.12 Safety Hazard Notification. The Contractor shall notify the

Government of any apparent safety hazards posed by the planned efforts. In the event of an extreme emergency, the Contractor shall be allowed to abort the Range Target Systems effort. Safety hazard notification shall be made to the TMO Technical Representative, the supported organization, and the appropriate Range Safety personnel at the range where the mission is being conducted. Reporting shall be in person or by a telephone to the TMO Technical Representative, in person or by telephone to the supported organization, and in person or by telephone / radio to the appropriate Range Safety personnel.

3.2.1.9 Security Management

3.2.1.9.1 Classified information provided by the Government in support of the Target Systems project, or developed or acquired by the Contractor in accomplishing this contract, shall be handled in accordance with the procedures established in DoD 5220.22-M, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, and in accordance with the DoD Form 254, DoD Contract Security Classification Specification, incorporated into the contract.

3.2.1.9.2 For Official Use Only (FOUO) information provided by the Government in support of the Target Systems project, or developed or acquired by the Contractor in accomplishing this contract, shall be handled in accordance with the procedures established in DoD 5200.1-R, DoD Information Security Program.

3.2.1.9.3 The Contractor shall provide any request for release of information on the Target Systems project from persons or organizations outside of the Government. All request will be referred to the Contracting Officer for consideration in accordance with DoD 5400.7-R, DoD Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Program.

3.2.1.9.4 The Contractor shall provide release of general business reports or product information to the general public, including media representatives, pertaining to the Contractor’s organization, finances, or publicly available products if not restricted in any way by this SOW.

3.2.1.9.5 Employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access to Army installations, facilities and controlled access areas shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 30 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. The Contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected Contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer, if a COR is not assigned, within 30 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel. AT level I awareness training is available at the following website: https://atlevel1.dtic.mil/at.

3.2.1.9.6 Access and General Protection/Security Policy and Procedures.

Contractor and all associated subcontractors employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by government representative). The Contractor shall also provide all information required for background checks to meet installation access requirements to be accomplished by installation Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services or Security Office. Contractor workforce must comply with all personal identity verification requirements as directed by DoD, HQDA and local policy. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) at any individual facility or installation change, the Government may require changes in Contractor security matters or processes.

3.2.1.9.7 AT Awareness Training for Contractor Personnel Traveling Overseas. This standard language text requires US-based Contractor employees and associated sub-contractor employees to make available and to receive Government provided area of responsibility (AOR) specific AT awareness training as directed by AR 525-13. Specific AOR training content is directed by the combatant commander with the unit Antiterrorism Officer (ATO) being the local point of contact.

3.2.1.9.8 IWATCH Training. The Contractor and all associated sub- Contractors shall brief all employees on the local watch program (training standards provided by the requiring activity ATO). This local developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the COR. This training shall be completed within 60 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 60 calendar days after contract award.

3.2.1.9.9 The Contractor shall complete the DoD Information Assurance Awareness training prior to access to the IS and then annually thereafter.

3.2.1.9.10 For Contracts that Require an Operations Security (OPSEC) Standing Operating Procedure/Plan. The Contractor shall develop an OPSEC Standing Operating Procedure (SOP)/Plan IAW DI-MGMT-80934 (See CDRL A016) within 90 calendar days of contract award, to be reviewed https://atlevel1.dtic.mil/at and approved by the responsible Government OPSEC officer, per AR 530-1, Operations Security. This SOP/Plan will include the Government's critical information, why it needs to be protected, where it is located, who is responsible for it, and how to protect it. In addition, the Contractor shall identify an individual who will be an OPSEC Coordinator. The Contractor will ensure this individual becomes OPSEC Level II certified per AR 530-1.

3.2.1.9.11 For Contracts that Require OPSEC Training. Per AR 530-1, Operations Security, new Contractor employees must complete Level I OPSEC training within 30 calendar days of their reporting for duty. All Contractor employees must complete annual OPSEC awareness training.

3.2.1.9.12 For Information Assurance (IA)/information technology (IT) training. All Contractor employees and associated sub-Contractor employees shall complete the DoD IA awareness training before issuance of network access and annually thereafter. All Contractor employees working IA/IT functions shall comply with DoD and Army training requirements in DoD 8570.01, DoD 8570.01-M and AR 25-2 within six months of employment.

3.2.1.9.13 For Contract Requiring Performance or Delivery in a Foreign

Country, DFARS Clause 252.225-7043, Antiterrorism/Force Protection for Defense Contractors Outside the US. The clause shall be used in solicitations and contracts that require performance or delivery in a foreign country. This clause applies to both contingencies and non-contingency support. The key AT requirement is for non-local national Contractor personnel to comply with theater clearance requirements and allows the combatant commander to exercise oversight to ensure the Contractor’s compliance with combatant commander and subordinate task force commander policies and directives.

3.2.1.9.14 For Contracts That Require Handling or Access to Classified

Information. Contractor shall comply with FAR 52.204-2, Security Requirements. This clause involves access to information classified “Confidential,” “Secret,” or “Top Secret” and requires Contractors to comply with The Security Agreement (DD Form 441), including the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD 5220.22-M) and any revisions to DOD 5220.22-M, notice of which has been furnished to the Contractor.

3.2.1.10 Environmental Management

3.2.1.10.1 The Contractor and its subcontractor activities shall be in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. The Contractor shall accomplish all required tasks to ensure that design, maintenance, operation, manufacturing, programmatic decisions, and trade-off studies strive to eliminate or reduce hazardous materials and wastes. The Contractor shall establish priorities and goals for achievement of the above.

3.2.1.10.2 The Contractor shall maintain, continue to implement, and update as necessary the Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan for the Range Target Systems program using National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 411 for reference and information. The HMMP Plan shall be updated, if necessary, in accordance with DI-MGMT-81398 (See CRL A027). The Contractor shall not use any Class I Ozone Depleting Chemical/ Ozone Depleting substance (ODC/ODS) (identified at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/ods.html or any ODC/ODS solvents (identified at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/index.html in the manufacture or support of items required by this SOW unless a waiver is obtained from the Army Acquisition Executive. Any ODC/ODS refrigerant alternatives used must appear in the EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) list (identified at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/index.html and have received a toxicity clearance from the U.S. Army Public Health Command (USAPHC).

3.2.1.10.3 The Contractor shall prepare annual HMMP reports IAW DI-

MISC-81397 (See CDRL A026). The HMMP reports shall provide the following information:

3.2.1.10.3.1 Any of the following materials that are contained within a user end item: EPA 17 List materials (identified at http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/3350/33finb1.htm), beryllium, coatings (identified by MIL SPEC), functional fluids (e.g. coolant, hydraulic fluid, petroleum products), energetics/solid rocket motor components (including Explosives Class Number), advanced composite materials (e.g. fabricated from silica, graphite, carbon, boron, fiberglass), batteries, Class I / Class II ODS / ODC materials, and asbestos.

3.2.1.10.3.2 A general description (to include a graphic or drawing) of where these materials are located within the end item.

3.2.1.10.3.3 Required maintenance/repair/support materials to include:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 17 List materials, sealants, adhesives, coatings (identified by MIL SPEC), and Class I/Class II ODS/ODC materials.

3.2.1.10.3.4 Any EPCRA 302/313 materials (identified at

http://www.epa.gov/emergencies/docs/chem/title3_Oct_2006.pdf) utilized in the manufacturing process. The Contractor shall provide immediate notification of any proposed hazardous material mitigation/elimination efforts that may adversely impact schedules, cost and performance.

3.2.1.11 Information Assurance (IA)

http://www.epa.gov/ozone/ods.html http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/index.html http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/index.html http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/3350/33finb1.htm http://www.epa.gov/emergencies/docs/chem/title3_Oct_2006.pdf

The Contractor shall provide IA system-level support functions IAW provisions in the following documentation and references: DoDD 8500.01 and DoDI 8500.02 to include the product specification and evaluation requirements stated in paragraph E3.2.5 (Common Criteria) and the DoD Unified Capabilities (UC) Approved Product List(APL), DoDI 8580.1, DoDI 8510.01, DoDD 8570.01, DoD 8570.01-M, AR 25-2, and BBP 05-PR-M-002 (Army Best Business Practices), the acquisition life cycle requirements of DoDD 5000.01 and DoDI 5000.2, Federal Information System Management Act (FISMA) security requirements, Appendix III of OMB A-130, to include the configuring systems to Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) compliance, patch management, Information Assurance Vulnerability Management (IAVM), AR 380-5, National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems Security Policy (NSTISSP), No. 11 with revisions, “National Policy Governing the Acquisition of Information Assurance(IA) and IA-enabled Information Technology Product,” DoDD 8500.01E, paragraph E2.1.16.4 of the current version of PEO STRI Basic Accreditation Manual (BAM) and cyclical support to remediate or mitigate known critical issues, and other Information Assurance functions as required.

3.2.1.11.1 In accordance with DoD 8570.01, AR 25-2 (4-3 Information

Assurance Training), and Army BBP 05-PR-M-002, the Contractor shall require that lead and support personnel performing IA-enabled job functions possess the Information Assurance Management (IAM) or Information Assurance Technical (IAT) certification relevant to their role within the execution of this contract. IA engineers, analysts, and technicians shall complete the required "IA Awareness Training.” Method of training for "IA Awareness Training" is https://ia.signal.army.mil, titled "DoD Information Assurance Awareness Mandatory IA Training.” The Contractor’s IA Team shall complete the required "Information Assurance Fundamentals Training."

All Contractor IA training certifications must be sent to TMO IAM and or PEO STRI IA designee through the Government Technical Representative.

3.2.1.11.2 The Contractor shall establish a program IA liaison with the

Government Technical Representative, or designee, to provide and maintain up-to-date status of IA accreditation/remediation efforts. The Contractor shall assist in the upkeep of the System Identification Profile (SIP) and the DoD Information Assurance Process Implementation Plan (DIP) for each system configuration as necessary.

3.2.1.11.3 The Contractor shall configure the system to maintain an

Authority to operate certification as required to the Mission Assurance Category and Certification Level. The Contractor shall coordinate with the Government Technical Representative to maintain the system accreditation by incorporating the necessary Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) compliance updates and mitigating the results of penetration…