ATTCH_2_Past_Perf_Cover_Letter_ _Questionaire.docx
DOCX document 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Picatinny/ARDEC IT Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W15QKN16R0070
About this file
ATTCH 2 Past Perf Cover Letter Questionaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W15QKN16R0070-0004.pdf | ||
| W15QKN16R0070-0003.pdf | ||
| ATTCH_1_Picatinny_ARDEC_IT_Support_Services_PWS-Task_1-20Jun16.doc | DOC document | |
| W15QKN-16-R-0070-0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6_Labor_Category_Description.docx | DOCX document | |
| W15QKN-16-R-0070-0001.pdf | ||
| W15KQN-16-R-0070.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_A_Base_CDRLs_-_DD1423.pdf | ||
| ATTCH_5_CDRLS_DD1423-2_Task_1.pdf | ||
| ATTCH_4_QASP_Basic.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTCH_1_Picatinny_ARDEC_IT_Support_Services_PWS-Task_1-2May16.doc | DOC document | |
| ATTCH_3_LABOR_CATEGORIES_AND_RATES_TABLE.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTCH_6_Labor_Category_Descriptions.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND – NEW JERSEY
PICATINNY ARSENAL, NEW JERSEY 07806-5000
May 19, 2016
Dear Sir or Madam:
The Army Contracting Command – New Jersey is acquiring Information Support for Picatinny Arsenal Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC) to fulfill its mission. Requirements include the purchase of various quantities over a five year ordering period along with delivery of associated Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) items.
The U.S. Army is conducting a performance risk assessment in anticipation of a possible contract award. An Offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract which the Offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the Offeror in the area of past performance. The Questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the Offeror’s performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to our evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
Please complete and submit the Questionnaire within 15 days of receipt via e-mail to the undersigned Contracting Officer at katherine.n.conklin.civ@mail.mil. Please also copy by E-mail frank.j.corradi.civ@mail.mil and austin.m.alpaugh.civ@mail.mil. If you have any questions relative to the enclosed Questionnaire, please contact any of the above.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely, //signed//
| Katherine N. Conklin |
| Contracting Officer |
Past Performance Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire within 15 days after receipt. Thank you.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
FAX Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) A. Compliance of Products, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship.
· Exceeds Contractual Requirements (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Meets Contractual Requirements
· Failed to Meet Contractual Requirements (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Satisfactory
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
C. Timeliness of Performance for Product Deliverables, including the Administrative Aspects of Performance.
· Exceeds Contractual Requirements (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Meets Contractual Requirements
· Failed to Meet Contractual Requirements (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Project Cost.
· Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Satisfactory
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) image2.emf image3.emf image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .