TracFone #9 Env Bid_Specs.docx

DOCX document 167 KB Posted

Attached to
2018 TracFone
Solicitation number
RFQ 171 180000000536 1
Issued by
Livonia City, Michigan

About this file

This is a printing services bid request issued by the Department of Technology, Management & Budget for the production of TracFone #9 reply envelopes. The project requires the manufacture of #9 white regular envelopes with side seam construction and gum seal closure. The envelopes are to be printed with two-sided black ink and packaged in carton packs. The specific quantity is not explicitly stated in the available documentation, though the request references a sample and proof for vendor verification.

The Department of Technology, Management & Budget awards printing contracts based on best price and value to the state, meaning the lowest bidder may not automatically receive the award if quality concerns or inability to meet requirements are present. All bids must come from prequalified vendors only. The bid specifications indicate standard printing parameters including 24# text weight stock, two-sided black ink application, and carton packaging. No specific response deadline, award date, contract term, or pricing information is included in the provided documentation.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & BUDGET

PRINTING SERVICES

BID REQUEST

JOB DESCRIPTION

Title: TracFone #9 Reply Envelope

Quantity:
COMMENTS

Finish Size: #9 Regular Env.

#9 White Regular Envelope Side Seam 24# Gum Seal 2 Sided, Black Ink Carton Pack

Ink(s): 2-Sided,Black Ink

Cover:

Text: 24# Side Seam Construction, Gum Seal

Bindery:

Packing: Carton Pack

File:

Sample:

Proof:

The Department of Technology, Management & Budget awards bids on best price and value to the state. In some situations, the lowest bidder may not receive an award because the bid does not provide best value. Examples include past quality concerns or inability to meet requirements. Only prequalified vendors will be considered.

image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .