T2976 Appendix B Barriers to Utilization of DBEs 6.9.21.pdf
PDF 736 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 21DPP00642
- Issued by
- Mercer County, New Jersey
About this file
This document is a report titled "Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts" submitted to the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) by Macro International Inc. and Taurus Market Research. The report presents the findings of a qualitative and quantitative analysis conducted to identify barriers faced by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) in obtaining NJDOT contracts, as well as barriers encountered by DBEs in securing subcontracts from Prime Contractors and barriers encountered by Prime Contractors in utilizing the services of DBEs. Key recommendations include holding workshops to bring together DBEs and Prime Contractors, providing new incentives and publicizing existing incentives to use DBEs, better publicizing bid platforms to facilitate connections between Prime Contractors and DBEs, setting aside smaller contracts that DBEs can compete for as Prime Contractors, and increasing oversight of DBE requirements and qualifications.
The report notes that the majority of DBE firms have not received contacts with either the NJDOT directly or through a NJDOT Prime Contractor. It provides quantitative data on the characteristics and contracting experiences of Prime Contractors, Consultants, and DBEs, as well as qualitative insights gathered through interviews. Barriers identified include lack of relationships between Prime Contractors and DBEs, administrative burdens, cash flow and financing issues, and concerns about risk and quality when using new or unfamiliar DBE firms.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| T2976 Appendix A NAICS Codes 6.9.21.pdf | ||
| T2976 Bid Amendment 1 09.03.21~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| T2976 Optional Pre-Quote Conference 6.9.21.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| T2976 Confidentiality and Commitment to Defend 6.9.21.pdf | ||
| T2976 Price Sheet 6.9.21~1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| T2976 Vendor Bidder Checklist 6.9.21.docx | DOCX document | |
| T2976 Revised Bid Solicitation 09.03.21.docx | DOCX document | |
| T2976 Offer and Acceptance Page 6.9.21~1.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BARRIERS TO UTILIZATION OF DBES BY PRIME
CONTRACTORS IN NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS
Qualitative and Quantitative Results
Submitted to:
New Jersey Department of Transportation
1035 Parkway Avenue
P.O. Box 600
Trenton, NJ 08625-0600
Submitted by:
Macro International Inc.
116 John Street, Suite 800
New York, NY 10038
Subcontractor for:
Taurus Market Research
1810 Englishtown Road
Old Bridge, NJ 08857
Appendix B
21DPP00642
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Supportive Services Consultant
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction Purpose Objectives
Methodology Quantitative Methodology Qualitative Methodology
Executive Summary
Conclusions and Recommendations
Quantitative Findings Prime Contractors and Consultants Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs)
Qualitative Findings DBE Experiences with Contracting/Subcontracting DBE Experiences of Prime Contractors Recommendations for Improvement
Appendix: Survey Instruments NJDOT Survey of Prime Contractors & Consultants – 2007 NJDOT Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Supportive Services Survey - 2007 .. 41
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 1
INTRODUCTION
The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) receives Federal funding via the United
States Department of Transportation (USDOT) for various transportation projects throughout the
State. Federal regulations stipulate that at least 10 percent of these Federal funds must be expended with Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs). DBEs are for profit small businesses in which socially and/or economically disadvantaged individuals 1) own at least a 51 percent interest and 2) control management and daily business operations. Socially and economically disadvantaged individuals are members of racial and ethnic minority groups, women, and other individuals on a case-by-case basis. A firm must also meet certain minimum size standards in order to be considered a small business. The goal of the DBE program is to support these firms enough so that they can eventually enter the mainstream construction and consulting industries.
State and local transportation agencies must establish annual goals for the participation of DBEs, as well as continually review individual contracts to establish project specific DBE subcontracting goals. In the State of New Jersey, the NJDOT annually submits a numerical DBE goal to the USDOT, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for the upcoming fiscal year.
Individual project goals are set based on identified DBE subcontracting opportunities. The
Division of Civil Rights/Affirmative Action (DCR/AA) is the NJDOT division responsible for administering the DBE Program.
In addition to establishing goals, transportation agencies who receive USDOT funds must also certify firms as eligible to participate in the DBE program. In order to streamline the certification process and as required by Federal regulations, in 2005 the NJDOT entered into a reciprocal arrangement with New Jersey Transit (NJT) and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
(PANY&NJ) and formed the New Jersey Unified Certification Program (NJUCP). The NJUCP is a reciprocity agreement between the three certifying agencies—NJT, NJDOT and the PANY&NJ.
Under the initiative, a DBE may submit a single application to any one of these agencies and be certified as an eligible DBE for all of them. Firms that are certified as DBEs by any of these agencies are automatically included in the NJUCP database, which contractors can use to find eligible DBEs to work with to meet their contracting goals.
Currently, there are about 200 DBE firms participating in the NJUCP that can potentially perform services for the NJDOT. These firms are typically small, generally have limited resources and often have limited experience with the requirements for administering, documenting, and/or fulfilling contractual requirements on consultant and construction projects. Of DBE firms participating in the NJUCP, 70 percent have never received a contract with a primary NJDOT contractor, and 80 percent have never received one with the NJDOT directly. At present, there are approximately 200 Prime Contractors who perform various professional and construction services for the NJDOT. Generally, these contracts are large enough to present opportunities for subcontracting to DBE firms.
PURPOSE
Given that the majority of DBE firms have not received contacts with either the NJDOT directly or through a NJDOT Prime Contractor, the NJDOT required a needs assessment research to identify why more DBEs are not receiving contracts. NJDOT contracted with Taurus Market
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 2
Research (Taurus) and Macro International, Inc. (Macro) to conduct this research. The
Taurus/Macro team was retained by the NJDOT to conduct a qualitative and quantitative analysis of barriers to utilizing new Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) in NJ DOT contracts.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this research is to perform a needs assessment among both DBEs and Prime
Contractors to identify barriers:
Faced by DBEs in obtaining NJDOT contracts and recommendations for how to overcome these impediments;
Encountered by DBEs in securing subcontracts from Prime Contractors and recommendations as to how to overcome these obstacles;
Encountered by Prime Contractors in utilizing the services of DBEs and recommendations as to how to overcome them.
The quantitative approach used survey data to identify the barriers faced by DBE firms and Prime
Contractors. The qualitative approach used one-on-one interviews to develop recommendations for how to overcome the barriers identified in the surveys.
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 3
METHODOLOGY
QUANTITATIVE METHODOLOGY
In March of 2008, Macro conducted the mail survey of DBEs and Prime Contractors/Consultants.
Macro selected a sample of Prime Contractors (contractors), Prime Consultants (consultants), and
DBE firms (DBEs) from a database provided by the NJDOT. The sample for the three groups combined resulted in a total of 682 firms.
Three mailings were completed over the course of four months, each with a one week telephone follow-up. A maximum of four contact attempts were made to each firm. Of 682 surveys, 309 were returned, for an overall response rate of 45 percent. The highest response rate was among
DBEs, at 53 percent, followed by Consultants at 44 percent, and Contractors at 38 percent. The returned surveys were data entered and tabulations were developed based on groups of interest to the NJDOT.
Table 1. Response Rate by Sample Group
Sample Size Returns Response Rate
Contractors 274 105 38%
Consultants 135 60 44%
DBEs 273 144 53%
Total 682 309 45%
QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGY
The State selected the DBEs and Prime Contractors from the database of completed surveys to be interviewed. Taurus/ Macro worked with the State to determine screening criteria (i.e. number of years certified, number of contracts awarded, size of firm, location, etc.) to participate in one-on-one interviews. A random sample of DBEs and Prime Contractors were screened from the list provided by the State. In order to yield a total of 40 completed face to face interviews (20 DBEs and 20 Prime Contractors) we screened from a pool of approximately 80 potential respondents.
Members of Taurus‘s recruitment unit recruited the DBEs and Prime Contractors. To ensure attendance, respondents were each given a $50 honorarium. After agreeing to participate in the interview, the respondents were sent an information packet that confirmed the time and date of the interview, the location, and directions to the location. Prior to the interview, the respondents were called to verify that they would be attending.
The interviews were conducted during June, July, and August 2008. The primary purpose of the interviews was to gather information to be used in making recommendations for 1) helping DBEs overcome barriers to bidding or participating as subcontractors; and 2) helping Prime Contractors increase their utilization of DBEs.
A total of 40 one-on-one interviews were conducted with Prime Contractors and representatives of DBE firms. The objective was to speak with companies that had served as Prime Contractors on NJ DOT contracts, including those who had and had not used a new DBE company within the past three years; and to speak with representatives of DBE firms that had been used as
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 4 subcontractors on NJ DOT contracts, as well as DBE firms that had not been used as subcontractors. All interviews were audio-taped, and the interviewers also took notes during each interview.
Separate interview guides were developed for each of the four respondent categories seen in the table below:
Table 1: Respondent Groups
Prime Contractors who had used a new DBE within the past 3 years 5
Prime Contractors who had not used a new DBE within the past 3 years 12
DBEs who had been used by a Prime Contractor 16
DBEs who had not been used by a Prime Contractor 7
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Taken together, the quantitative and qualitative studies revealed several common issues for prime contractors and DBEs. The most salient issue is a lack of relationships between the two. From the perspective of prime contractors, respondents to the interviews indicated that they would not use a subcontractor unless they had a good referral or a proven reputation. Similarly, two factors emerged during the survey of prime contractors as most important when selecting a subcontractor: 1) experience—33 percent of contractors and 35 percent of consultants said this was the most important thing; and 2) reputation—the most important among 33 percent of consultants and 24 percent of contractors.
From the perspective of DBEs, interview respondents felt that having a track record with specific
Prime Contractors was the most important factor to getting subcontracts. When asked why they had not performed any work for Primes on NJ DOT contracts, several respondents in this group mentioned the lack of prior relationships with Primes. The survey of Prime Contractors found that three-quarters of Prime Contractors who had been satisfied with the work of a first time DBE maintained a business relationship with the firm. However, DBEs that have subcontracts may not rely only on prior business with Prime Contractors. The interviews revealed that the most striking difference between DBEs who had gotten subcontracts in the past three years and those who had not was the level of marketing activities: DBEs that did more marketing got more contracts.
In the interviews, another barrier expressed by both Prime contractors and DBEs was staffing.
From the perspective of Prime Contractors, many DBEs do not have enough staff to accommodate the needs of the subcontract or to respond to requests in a timely manner. Indeed, the survey results showed that most DBEs are very small—only one-third of respondents had more than 16 employees. From the perspective of DBEs, the paperwork associated with NJ DOT or any government contract was a large responsibility.
Both Prime Contractors and DBEs expressed concerns about risk and considered it a barrier to entering into contracting relationships. From the perspective of Prime contractors, using a DBE
(particularly a new DBE) comes with a great amount of risk. Interviewees said that the risks in using a new DBE—in terms of the reputation of the firm, and the impact on costs and profitability if there are errors—are just too great. Ultimately, they are responsible for making sure that the job gets done, and they need to ensure that their subcontractors are reliable and accurate. From the perspective of DBE interview respondents, their risks come from not being paid by the Prime contractor in a timely manner for work they have done.
Finally, both Prime Contractors and DBE respondents felt that more monitoring and certification should take place to ensure that 1) all DBEs are qualified to do the work; and 2) all DBEs are actually minority owned businesses instead of ―pass through‖ operations. Prime contractors in both the survey and the interviews felt they would be more willing to use a DBE, particularly a new DBE, if there was some rating or vetting process by which they could be assured of quality work. DBEs felt that they often have to compete with firms that are DBEs in name but are not actually owned by members of disadvantaged groups.
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 6
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Hold a workshop for Prime Contractors and DBEs
The majority of respondents to both the survey and the interviews expressed interest in a DOT-sponsored workshop to bring together DBEs and Prime Contractors. Prime contractors felt it would allow them to explain the administrative, logistical, and financial aspects of working on these contracts and DBEs welcomed the opportunity to have a venue where they could introduce themselves to potential Primes. Workshops such as these may address the barrier of lack of relationships between Prime Contractors and DBEs.
For new DBEs, Prime contractors specifically requested that NJ DOT provide some outreach training regarding basic knowledge about the contracting business—how Primes like to be approached, what information they need to make smart business decisions, what NJ DOT‘s expectations are, and what the Prime Contractor needs and expects from subcontractors. Ideally, this training should occur before they actually are used as a subcontractor on a NJ DOT contract, and should include assistance with setting up pricing and systems and processes for contract management and performance monitoring. Not surprisingly, DBE survey respondents requested workshops with the same kinds of information. The topics of most interest to them include contract-related information, accounting and tax information, marketing information, and doing business with the government. This training may also address difficulties with administrative functions that DBEs expressed in interviews.
2) Provide new incentives and publicize existing incentives to use DBEs
Half of the prime contractors who participated in the interviews were not aware of the new NJ
DOT DBE Incentive Program. Clearly, this program needs increased publicity in order to be effective. Further, respondents to both the interviews and the surveys had suggestions for additional incentives: 1) financial incentives; 2) relaxing certain requirements relative to the
Prime Contractor‘s performance rating and the risk assumed by the Prime; and 3) devoting a smaller percentage of the contract to subcontracts if first-time DBEs were used as subcontractors.
Implementing this recommendation would address the barrier of perceived risk on the part of the
Prime Contractor.
3) Better publicize bid express and other modules by which Prime Contractors and DBEs can find each other
One of the common difficulties that both Prime Contractors and DBEs expressed was difficulty finding opportunities to work together. DBEs expressed trouble finding opportunities in a timely manner and Prime Contractors expressed trouble finding DBEs that provide the specialty services that they require subcontractors for (e.g. inspections, geotechnical/surveying, electrical work).
Almost half of all Prime Contractors surveyed used Bid Express, although fewer were aware of the small business section. Bid express was only used by 1 in 10 DBE survey respondents and few were aware of the small business section of this enterprise. However, 75 percent of DBEs expressed an interest in it. Publicizing this channel of communication may benefit both Prime
Contractors and DBEs in finding opportunities to work together.
4) Set aside small contracts that DBEs can compete for as Prime Contractors
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 7
Both Prime Contractors and DBEs suggested that NJ DOT unbundle some of the current larger contracts to set aside smaller contracts that can be awarded directly to DBEs. They said that this would give the DBE an opportunity to comply with DOT‘s contract requirements without putting the reputation and record of an existing Prime Contractor at risk. From the perspective of DBEs, this would allow them more experience with NJDOT projects, making them more attractive to
Prime Contractors on larger contracts. Further, smaller contracts would demand less staff and be better suited to smaller entities as most DBEs are, addressing the staffing barrier.
5) Increase oversight of DBE requirements and qualifications
Both Prime Contractors and DBEs felt that ownership and management of DBE companies be scrutinized more closely to ensure that the companies delivered quality work, and really were
―disadvantaged.‖ Further, some DBE interview respondents urged the NJ DOT to enforce its
DBE requirements more closely so that Prime Contractors adhered to the spirit of the DBE subcontracting requirements.
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 8
QUANTITATIVE FINDINGS
PRIME CONTRACTORS AND CONSULTANTS
COMPANY SPECIALTY
Among contractors responding to the survey, general contracting (37%) and excavation (29%) were the two most frequently reported businesses. For consultants, the main businesses reported by respondents were civil engineering (77%) and environmental engineering (28%).
Industry
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
Architecture - 13
Civil Engineering 2 77
Demolition 9 -
Electrical Engineering - 12
Electrical Contracting 6 -
Environmental Engineering - 28
Excavation 29 -
General Contracting 37 -
HVAC - 7
Landscaping 6 5
Painting 9 -
Plumbing 21 -
Sewer Services 13 3
Traffic Control 8 3
Trucking 6 -
Underground Construction 22 3
Other 53 40
YEARS IN BUSINESS
The majority of contractors (70%) and consultants (72%) have been in business for 21 or more years. Only about one-in-ten of all firms surveyed have been in business for 10 years or less.
Years in Business
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
10 years or less 10 8
11 – 20 years 20 20
21+ years 70 72
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 9
INVOLVEMENT IN PUBLIC CONTRACTING
Among contractors, about six-in-ten (61%) say their business is predominantly public contracting
(contracting with public agencies such as local, state and Federal governments). Contractors who are not primarily involved in public contracting said they are involved in the commercial, industrial, and residential sectors. For consultants, two-thirds (68%) reported that their business was predominantly public contracts. Consultants not primarily involved in public contracting said they were primarily involved in private and commercial sector contracts.
Public Contracting
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
Mainly in Public Contracting 61 68
Not mainly in Public Contracting 39 32
Base: Not Mainly in Public Contracting (41)* (19)*
Other Sectors
Commercial 34 26
Residential 19 21
Industrial 22 11
Private 17 37
Utility 7 16
Construction 7 5
Engineering -- 21
Hospitals 7 --
*Caution: Small base
USE OF SUBCONTRACTORS
Few contractors and consultants regularly use subcontractors. The majority of contractors and consultants have had less than five NJDOT contracts that used subcontractors in the past ten years
(68% and 55%, respectively). Only about one-in-seven contractors or consultants have over 20 projects that involve a subcontractor (13% and 15%) in the past ten years. Among contractors, one-in-five do not subcontract out any of their work (18%). About one-third subcontract one to 10 percent of their projects (32%). For consultants, they are most likely to subcontract between 11 and 30 percent of their contacts (70%).
Use of Subcontractors
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
Number of Contracts % %
Less than 5 68 55
5 – 9 11 12
10 – 20 6 15
Over 20 13 15
Number of Contracts
None 18 -
1 – 10% 32 25
11 – 20% 23 43
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 10
Use of Subcontractors
Contractors Consultants
21 – 30% 11 27
31 – 100% 17 5
Types of Work Subcontracted Most contractors and consultants that do use subcontractors use them for specialty services.
Among contractors, the most often subcontracted work is electrical (48%), followed by landscaping (22%) and paving (20%). Among consultants, just over one-half (55%) subcontract for surveying, followed by environmental (23%) and geotechnical inspections (22%).
Types of Work Subcontracted
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (99) (60)
Concrete 16 --
Electrical 48 7
Inspection -- 5
Landscape 22 2
Plumbing 8 --
Paving 20 --
Surveying -- 55
Guide / Guard Rail 16 --
Construction Inspection -- 17
Environmental -- 23
Geotechnical Inspection -- 22
Traffic -- 12
Air Noise Inspection -- 7
Factors Considered when Selecting a Subcontractor Respondents were asked what factors, other than price, were considered when selecting a subcontractor for the first time. Two factors emerged as of primary importance to both groups.
The primary factor considered when selecting a subcontractor is experience—33 percent among contractors and 35 percent among consultants. The second most important factor for both groups is reputation—33 percent among consultants and 24 percent among contractors. Consultants were nearly equally concerned about quality (32%). Nearly one-in-five contractors listed ability to compete/perform as their next most important consideration.
Factors when Selecting a Subcontractor
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (94) (60)
Ability to Complete / Perform 18 10
Experience 33 35
Reliability 13 7
Quality 16 32
Reputation 24 33
References 14 20
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 11
Required To Meet A DBE Subcontract Goal The majority of contractors and consultants surveyed have been required to meet a DBE subcontract goal (67% and 77%, respectively). Of those who met a DBE goal, contractors had a more difficult time identifying DBE subcontractors than consultants (30% vs. 17%). The primary issue with identifying a subcontractor is that there is simply a lack of them.
Awareness of NJDOT DBE Incentive Program Exactly four-out-of-ten of both contractors and consultants surveyed are aware of the NJDOT
DBE Incentive program. Of those who are aware, about one-third of both contractors (31%) and consultants (32%) feel this program provides adequate incentive to use a first-time DBE. Of those that provided an answer, the majority felt that that there was a lack of experienced DBEs for the work that was required.
Awareness of NJDOT DBE Incentive Program
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
Not Aware of Program 60 60
Aware of Program 40 40
Base: Aware of NJDOT DBE (42)* (24)*
Provides Adequate Incentive 31 32
Does Not Provide Adequate Incentive 69 68
Reasons Why Not (9)* (5)*
Need for experienced DBEs 4 4
Unsure of Incentives 1 1
Other 4 --
* Caution: Small Base
REQUIRED TO MEET DBE GOAL
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
Not required to meet DBE Goal 33 23
Required to meet DBE Goal 67 77
Base: Met DBE Goal (70) (46)
Problem Identifying DBE Subcontractor 30 17
Specific Problems Mentioned (21)* (8)**
Lack of subcontractors 86 4
Can’t achieve DBE goals 19 --
Price 5 1
Other -- 3
*Caution: Small base
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 12
Experience with a First-Time DBE Subcontractor Contractors and consultants had very similar experiences with DBEs in this program. Less than one-third of contractors or consultants had used a first-time DBE subcontractor (31% and 30%, respectively). Two-thirds of both contractors and consultants who had used a first-time DBE found the work to be satisfactory. Across both groups, among those who found the DBE work to be satisfactory, three-quarters reported maintaining a business relationship with the DBE firm.
Experience with a First-Time DBE Subcontractor
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
Ever Used a First Time DBE Subcontractor 31 30
Base: Used a First Time DBE Subcontractor (32)* (18)*
Work Was Satisfactory 69 67
Work Not Satisfactory 31 33
Specific Problems With Work Performed (9)* (6)*
Inexperience of DBEs 3 3
Quality -- 3
Scheduling 3 --
Other 3 --
Maintain Business Relationship 76 71
Did Not maintain Business Relationship 21 29
Reason relationship Not maintained (6)* (5)*
No longer work in area 3 --
Quality -- 4
Other 3 1
* Caution: Small Base
Type of Incentive Needed To Participate in the NJDOT Incentive Program Respondents that have not participated in the DBE incentive program were asked what type of incentive would cause them to seriously consider using a first time DBE subcontractor. The majority of contractors cited some sort of financial incentive, while consultants were more varied in their answers and more often asked for more information about the DBE.
Incentives to Participate in DBE Program
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (66) (41)
Ability to be a prime -- 5
Training hours -- 5
Financial incentive 20 5
References 6 5
Selected on more projects 2 7
Better ratings / information 6 12
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 13
Incentives to Participate in DBE Program
Contractors Consultants
DBEs don’t affect rating 5 5
Past performance 10 5
Do not subcontract 4 --
Suggestions on How to Increase Usage of DBEs When asked what suggestions they have on how to increase the usage of DBEs, one-third of prime contractors were unable to make a suggestion. Among contractors, the most common suggestion was pre-qualification or rating of DBE firm quality. For consultants, the most common suggestion was to provide incentives for using new DBE firms.
Suggestions to Increase Use of DBEs
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (62) (33)
More information 6 --
Incentives for new DBEs -- 15
Pre-qualifications 11 --
None 35 30
Other 50 55
Willingness to Participate in Mentor-Protégé Program Respondents were asked whether they would be willing to participate in a mentor-protégé program with a DBE. Most contractors (68%) said that they would not be willing to participate.
The reasons given by this group included not doing enough work for NJDOT to make this worthwhile, not having enough time to participate, and not having enough information about the program. A little less than half of all consultants (47%) said that they would be unwilling to participate in such a program. Time constraints and being a subcontractor themselves were the main reasons cited by this group.
Willingness to Participate in Mentor-Protégé Program
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
Willing To Partner 42 53
Not Willing To Partner 68 47
Reasons Not Willing to Partner (33) (17)
Not much work 30 12
Takes too much time 20 18
Affect on company 6 --
Not familiar with program 15 12
Already a subcontractor 6 18
Size -- 6
Other 23 34
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 14
Willingness to Participate in an NJDOT-Sponsored Workshop Respondents were asked if they were willing to participate in a NJDOT-sponsored workshop event designed to partner prime contractors and consultants with DBE contractors and consultants. About one-half of contractors (53%) and 70 percent of consultants surveyed said they would participate. More consultants (47%) would prefer such a workshop took place in central New Jersey, about an equal amount of contractors preferred Northern, Central, and
Southern New Jersey as locations for the workshop. Most respondents from both groups preferred workshops to be held in winter months, presumably when there are fewer contracting opportunities available. As for a preference for a particular day of the week, Tuesdays through
Thursdays are preferred. Both contractors and consultants have a preference for the workshop to be held in the morning. In terms of the length of the meeting, contractors prefer the meeting to be one to two hours, while consultants would prefer a longer meeting (three to four hours). One-quarter of contractors are willing to attend a DBE workshop, while among consultants, it is a bit higher (35%). Of those willing to attend, 19 percent of contractors would be willing to pay up to
$99, and 35 percent of consultants would be willing to pay up to $149. Contact by mail or e-mail is the preferred mode of communication among both contractors and consultants.
NJDOT-SPONSORED WORKSHOP
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
Would Participate in NJDOT Workshop 53 70
Location of Workshop
Northern New Jersey 23 28
Central New Jersey 27 47
Southern New Jersey 23 22
Month
January 37 32
February 45 40
March 20 30
April 7 20
May 4 13
June 5 13
July 5 12
August 3 10
September 4 13
October 6 18
November 7 13
December 3 13
Day of the Week
Monday 13 22
Tuesday 26 48
Wednesday 34 50
Thursday 27 53
Friday 15 25
Saturday 6 5
Time of Day
Morning 51 65
Afternoon 18 15
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 15
NJDOT-SPONSORED WORKSHOP
Contractors Consultants
Evening 4 10
Length of Meeting
1 – 2 hours 45 30
3 – 4 hours 19 47
5+ hours 2 3
Willingness to Attend 25 35
Willingness to Pay
Up to $49 7 12
$50 – 99 12 10
$100 – 149 3 13
Notification
Mail 49 50
Phone 4 3
Fax 7 5
E-mail 37 65
Bid Express Member Just over one-half of contractors are Bid Express members (55%), as opposed to just 15 percent of consultants. Of those who are not Bid Express members, only 15 percent of contractors and 35 percent of consultants are interested in becoming one. Among Bid Express members, just over a quarter of contractors (26%) purport to be familiar with the Small Business Network Tab.
BID EXPRESS MEMBER
Contractors Consultants
Base: Total (105) (60)
Bid Express Member 55 15
Not a Bid Express Member 45 85
Base: Not a Bid Express member (47) (51)
Interested in Becoming a Member 14 35
Base: Bid Express Member (46) (1)*
Familiar with Small Business Network Tab 26 --
Used of Small Business Network in Bid Express
Base: Used Small Business Network in Bid Express (105) (60)
Experience with Small Business Network (6)* --
Did not receive responses 1 --
Good 2 --
Not good enough 2 --
Not enough people 1 --
*Caution: Small base
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 16
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs)
Company Specialty Among DBE firms surveyed, the most frequently mentioned specialty is civil engineering (21%).
About one-in-ten mention general contracting (11%) or environmental engineering (9%). All other specialties are mentioned by six percent or less of respondents.
COMPANY’S SPECIALTY
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Company’s Specialty
Architecture 4
Civil Engineering 21
Demolition 4
Electrical Engineering 4
Electrical Contracting 4
Environmental Engineering 9
Excavation 6
General Contracting 11
Landscaping 6
Paving 6
Traffic Control 6
Trucking 4
Underground Construction 6
Other 9
License Types The most commonly held license is for a professional engineer (31%). Exactly one-in-ten have a surveying/mapping license. All other types of licenses held are mentioned much less frequently.
Other responses for types of licenses included the following:
Irrigation and pesticide, Traffic control, Roadway construction, United States Coast Guard, and
State-certified real estate appraiser.
LICENSE TYPES
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
License Types
Electrical 4
Professional Engineer 31
General Contractor 6
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 17
LICENSE TYPES
DBEs
Surveying/Mapping 10
Asphalt/Concrete 6
Architect 4
Traffic Control 4
Other 18
Company’s Years In Business The majority of DBE firms have been in business for 11 years or more (76%). Almost one-third have been in business for 21 years or more (30%). Most companies that have not benefited from being a DBE have existed for at least 11 years (73%), one-third of which for 16 to 20 years
(31%).
COMPANY’S Years in Business
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Company’s Age
0 – 5 years 7
6 – 10 years 17
11 – 15 years 22
16 – 20 24
21+ years 30
Base: Have not Benefited from being a DBE (48)
0 – 5 years 10
6 – 10 years 17
11 – 15 years 21
16 – 20 31
21+ years 21
Public Contracting Involvement About two-thirds of DBE firms are mainly involved in public contracting. Those not primarily involved in public contracting are most likely to be in private sector projects.
Private sector contracts who work for DBEs are as follows:
Goldman Sachs, Private auto insurance and worker‘s comp for the State of NJ, Private distribution and manufacturing industries, Pfizer pharmaceuticals and Johnson and Johnson, and
Private engineering firms.
PUBLIC CONTRACTING INVOLVEMENT
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 18
PUBLIC CONTRACTING INVOLVEMENT
DBEs
Mainly in Public Contracting 62
Not mainly in Public Contracting 38
Base: Not mainly in Public Contracting (55)
Other Sectors
Residential 10
Commercial 16
Private 36
Schools 7
Industrial 13
Government / state 29
Consultant firms 5
Engineering 7
Firm’s Size (Dollars) About seven-out-of-ten DBEs surveyed (73%) have revenues of $500,000 or more.
FIRM’S SIZE
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Under $99,999 8
$100,000 – 299,999 10
$300,000 – 499,999 8
$500,000+ 73
Firm’s Size (Employees) About a third of DBEs have fewer than five employees (34%). Another third have between five and 15 employees (34%), while another third have 16 or more employees (31%).
In terms of seasonal employees, exactly half of the firms have fewer than five. About a quarter of the firms have from five and 15 seasonal employees (24%), while 15 percent have 16 or more.
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Number of Regular Employees
Under 5 34
5 – 10 23
11 – 15 11
16 – 20 9
21+ 22
Number of Seasonal Employees
Under 5 50
5 – 10 18
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 19
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
DBEs
11 – 15 8
16 – 20 7
21+ 8
Branch Off Another Company The vast majority of DBE firms (94%) have not branched off from another company.
BRANCH OFF ANOTHER COMPANY
DBES
Base: Total (144)
Not Branched off from another company 94
Branched off from another company 6
Length of DBE Certification Almost half of DBEs (49%) have been certified with the NJDOT for more than ten years. Only
15 percent have been certified more recently (within the past three years). Almost eight-of-ten companies that have not benefited from being a DBE have been DBE-certified for over five years. The majority of those companies have been certified for over ten years (42%).
LENGTH OF DBE CERTIFICATION
DBES
Base: Total (144)
Length of DBE Certification
Less than 3 years 15
Over 5 years 33
Over 10 years 49
Base: Have not Benefited from being a DBE (48)
Less than 3 years 23
Over 5 years 35
Over 10 years 42
Whether Benefited from being a DBE Six-out-of-ten DBEs claim to have benefited from being a certified DBE. The way in which it has benefited them is that they get more jobs/contracts (46%). For the one-third (37%) who say they have not benefited, the primary reason mentioned was that they did not get any jobs.
WHETHER BENEFITED FROM BEING A DBE
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Have Benefited 63
How Benefited? (67)
More Jobs/contracts 62
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 20
WHETHER BENEFITED FROM BEING A DBE
DBEs
DBE Coverage 22
Networking 7
Other 9
Have Not Benefited 37
How Not Benefited? (45)
Not enough work 24
Outside NJ 16
Size 7
Information 4
Prequalification requirements 9
Lack of Opportunities for DBEs / small companies 11
Other 29
NJDOT Pre-qualified (Construction Contractors) Of DBEs that are construction contractors, 26 percent are pre-qualified.
NJDOT PRE-QUALIFIED (CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS)
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Yes, pre-qualified 26
Pre-qualified (37)*
Paving 16
Utilities maintenance 14
Streets / road / sidewalk maintenance 22
Concrete 19
Steel 14
Electric 14
No, not pre-qualified 74
Not pre-qualified (25)*
Not necessary / time 28
Not enough money 12
Distance 8
No work 12
Too much paperwork 8
Other 32
* Caution: Small Base
Problems Trying To Become Pre-Qualified DBEs who have attempted to become pre-qualified said lack of work and lack of time are the main reasons why they are not qualified.
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 21
PROBLEMS TRYING TO BECOME PRE-QUALIFIED
DBEs
Base: Not Pre-Qualified (21)*
No time 48
Do not subcontract 19
Size 43
Lack of Work 48
* Caution: Small Base
Cost-Based Approved or Pre-qualified Of DBEs that are consultant/professional services contractors, about one-third (32%) of them are pre-qualified.
COST-BASED APPROVED OR PRE-QUALIFIED
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Yes, cost-plus basis approved/pre-qualified 32
No, not cost-plus basis approved/pre-qualified 68
Reasons not cost-plus approved/pre-qualified (34)
Not aware 18
Too much work 12
In the beginning phase 6
No DOT projects 6
Not needed 6
Not Applicable 26
Other 26
NJDOT Contracts Almost half of DBEs (49%) have fewer than five NJDOT contracts. Twenty-one percent claim to have 10 or more projects.
NJDOT CONTRACTS
DBES
Base: Total (144)
Under 5 49
5 – 10 12
10 – 20 8
21+ 13
Reasons for not Working with the NJDOT DBEs that have not worked with the NJDOT cited primarily that they have encountered a lack of opportunities. This question is an open-ended question in the survey instrument with ―lack of opportunities‖ as a code for different types of responses. Some of those include:
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 22
We have not found anything in software development to bid on.
NJDOT does have contract of bids for custom machine parts.
There is not any construction management for small jobs.
There is a problem with amount of contracts. Bigger firms get one big annual contract instead of being broken down into smaller contracts for smaller firms.
There are no DBE goals for bridge painting construction inspection projects.
REASONS FOR NOT WORKING WITH the NJDOT
DBEs
Base: Total (80)
Reasons why DBE has not work with the NJDOT
Location 4
Information 8
Work in another state 3
Lack of opportunities 19
Size 1
Not applicable 34
Competition 1
Other 30
Work with Other Transportation Agencies About three-quarters of DBEs work with other transportation agencies, primarily NJ Transit and
Port Authority.
WORK WITH OTHER TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Work with other transportation firms
No 24
Yes 72
Other transportation firms (92)
Delaware DOT 8
Delaware River Port Authority 13
NJ Transit 47
NY/NJ Port Authority 41
Maryland DOT 3
MTA 11
NYDOT 24
Penn DOT 24
NJ Turnpike Agency 9
NYC DOT 11
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 23
Needs of Company to Develop Beyond Current Capacity The main reason for working with other transportation agencies is the opportunity for more work
(27%). This open-end response in the survey instrument included some of the following responses:
Need of public work contracts that cover the cost of prevailing wage and union scale.
Need of work in construction, project management, inspection, cost and quality estimation.
Need of more work to develop greater capacity.
More projects that advertise with increased DBE percentage.
WORK WITH OTHER TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES
DBEs
Base: Total (96)
More employees / larger facility 6
Set asides 6
More Work 27
Bid opportunities 4
Money 9
Information 8
Not applicable 3
Workshops / networking / conferences 6
None 7
NJDOT-Sponsored Workshop Three-out-of-ten DBEs have participated in a workshop related to their business (31%). Exactly three-fourths of DBEs are very/somewhat interested in participating in a NJDOT sponsored workshop. The topics of most interest to them include contract-related information, accounting and tax information, marketing information, and doing business with the government. DBEs who responded with ―contracting‖ as a topic of interest in NJDOT-sponsored workshops were coded as such. Examples of their responses are:
Interested in Government contracting along with doing business with proper contacts.
Doing business with government contracting to develop and finance your business.
Looking for contracts that are within my bonding range to grow one‘s business to qualify for larger bonding work.
Help with negotiating contracts and knowledge on contract law.
Need help meeting with prime contacts for professional service contracts.
The response ―Accounting / Tax Issues‖ was an answer DBEs could choose from. There are no reasons under it since DBEs only responded with ‗‖Accounting / Tax Issues.‖
NJDOT-SPONSORED WORKSHOP
DBEs
Participate in Any Workshop 31
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 24
DBEs
Would Participate in NJDOT Transportation Workshop
Very interested 37
Somewhat interested 38
Not very interested 14
Not at all interested 9
Topics of Interest Related to Technical Needs (97)
Accounting 2
All of the above 3
Business plan 12
Contracting 33
Business w/ government 19
Business w/ NJDOT 3
Financing 7
Government contracting 14
Marketing 26
Meetings 4
Not Applicable 7
Topics of Interest in Administrative / General Workshop (73)
Accounting / tax issues 32
All of the above 7
QuickBooks 12
None 18
Finance 7
Not Applicable 16
Other 8
Of those willing to attend an NJDOT-sponsored workshop:
Northern and Central New Jersey are the two locations most favored by DBEs, 35 and 31 percent of the time respectively.
DBEs favor the months of January (43%) and February (47%) for the month of the DBE workshop.
Four-of-ten DBEs prefer the workshop to be held on Wednesday or Thursday.
Almost half prefer the workshop to be held in the morning.
At least 80 percent of DBEs are willing to devote one to four hours on a workshop.
Almost half of DBEs prefer to be notified by e-mail or mail.
About 40 percent are willing to spend up to $99.
NJDOT-SPONSORED WORKSHOP
DBEs
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 25
DBEs
Participate in NJDOT DBE Workshop 72
Location of Workshop
Northern New Jersey 31
Central New Jersey 35
Southern New Jersey 21
Month
January 43
February 47
March 33
April 20
May 21
June 17
July 17
August 18
September 20
October 27
November 22
December 20
Day of the Week
Monday 28
Tuesday 35
Wednesday 40
Thursday 40
Friday 33
Saturday 27
Time of Day
Morning 54
Afternoon 31
Evening 19
Length of Meeting
1 – 2 hours 44
3 – 4 hours 39
5+ hours 8
Willingness to Attend 58
Base: Willingness to Pay (83)
Up to $49 23
$50 – 99 14
$100 – 149 8
$150 – 199 6
$200+ 8
Notification
Mail 49
Phone 6
Fax 22
E-mail 56
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 26
Bid Express Membership One-out-of-ten DBEs are Bid Express members. Of those who are not members, about one-half are interested in becoming a member.
Only 13 percent of DBEs are familiar with the small business network tab, while just 7 percent use the Small Business Network in Bid Express.
BID EXPRESS MEMBER
DBEs
Base: Total (144)
Bid Express Member 10
Base: Not a Bid Express Member (100)
Likelihood to Become a Bid Express Member 49
Base: Total (144)
Familiarity with Small Business Network tab
Yes 13
No 87
Use of Small Business Network in Bid Express
Yes 7
No 93
Bid Express is an online information service for transportation bidding that publishes bid-related information from state transportation agencies to vendors and also allows secure bid submissions from vendors to state transportation agencies.
The Small Business Network of Bid Express facilitates the interaction between prime contractors and subcontractors (including DBEs), allowing them to exchange subquotes and communicate about projects.
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 27
Qualitative Findings
DBE Experiences with Contracting/Subcontracting
Overview of Respondents The interviewers spoke with 23 representatives of DBEs, 16 were from firms that had been used as a subcontractor by a Prime Contractor on a NJ DOT contract. Seven of the respondents had not been used by a Prime. For the most part, those who had been used by Prime Contractors said that they had been in business for quite awhile, and that a fair amount of their business was built upon existing relationships.
―I‘ve been working in the field for 23 years,‖ said one. ―I do a good job, so I get repeat business.‖
―Previous work. Word gets around. We‘ve built a good reputation,‖ said another.
Yet a third DBE representative said, ―I had an established business reputation before the
DBE list.‖
In contrast, most of the respondents who had not been used as a subcontractor indicated that they had not been in business for long periods of time, although one did say that he had been ―in business since 1990.‖ Moreover, the DBE firms that had not gotten any subcontracts on NJ DOT contracts to date tended to be general contractors more than specialists in a particular field.
Because Prime Contractors prefer to subcontract out work that they cannot do, lack of specialization in new DBEs may be one part of the problem. ―We like to sub work that we don’t do ourselves. For geotechnical work, we use ______. We [also] subcontract work like air and noise studies,‖ said one Prime.
The types of work done by the DBEs for these Prime Contractors also varied considerably. While one respondent said that their firm did primarily bridge inspection and traffic assessment management, another one installed signs, did highway striping, and supplied items like traffic cones to the Prime Contractor. One firm did a variety of civil engineering tasks for numerous client firms; another dealt primarily with landscaping, providing seeding services and plantings to larger highway projects. Further, many of the DBE firms that received contracts had worked for some of the same major contractors, so it was clear that Prime Contractors were using a variety of
DBE firms to satisfy their subcontracting requirements. Of the 16 DBE firms that had done subcontracting for Prime Contractors on NJ DOT contracts, one firm was mentioned by five different DBEs; one firm was mentioned by four of the respondents; four were mentioned three times; six were mentioned twice; and 45 additional firms were mentioned at least once. These sixteen DBE firms combined had done work for a minimum of 82 Prime Contractors.
Differences between respondent groups All of the DBE firms we talked to had been approved for subcontracting work by NJ DOT. The most striking difference between DBEs who had gotten subcontracts in the past three years, compared with those who had not, was the level of pro-activity of the companies that had been used as a subcontractor, compared to the ―not used‖ category. Those who were successful in getting subcontracts said that they made contact with potential Primes as a part of their general marketing strategy, as well as in response to specific RFPs. Those who had not been successful to
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 28 date said that they were ―on the lists,‖ but their apparent assumption was that potential Primes should contact them, rather than the other way around.
Virtually every DBE that had been used by a Prime Contractor recently reported active marketing efforts, including:
Cold calls to potential Primes, Sending information (and conducting follow-up calls) to potential primes, Attending professional meetings, and
Actively searching for upcoming funding opportunities in a variety of sources.
―I have salesmen that go out and pound the pavement to get work.‖
―We give seminars in the field at professional conferences.‖
―A lot of cold calling, sending them information, word of mouth…‖
―We check [the DOT website] daily and see if prime contractors are listed on projects. Now we know everyone, so we call them more. But they will call us, too. Seventy-five percent, we call them. Twenty-five percent, they call us.‖
―We‘re on the list as a DBE firm for NJ DOT and NJ Transit. I solicited their business. They usually advertise for these jobs, and we see what we qualify for and put our names in.‖
For the DBE firms who had not been used as a subcontractor by a Prime Contractor, few or none of these proactive marketing efforts were reported. When asked how they found out about potential business opportunities with Prime Contractors, this group tended to respond much more passively:
―Normally, they contact me, those who need a minority firm.‖
―Typically, they solicit us for a quote, or we contact them and offer to give them a price on something.‖
The DBE representatives who had not had subcontracts through DOT were asked about their marketing efforts in general.
―We don‘t have any specific marketing efforts. The owner of our company is known in the industry,‖ said one.
―We approached a few companies. We sent about 50 letters total with our qualifications, but we got no response. We also had a web page which was not providing a response.‖
Only one of the unsuccessful DBEs said that they had done any cold calling. His response was, ―In the beginning, when I started the company [I did cold calling]. But not in the last seven years.‖ None of the others had done cold calling at all. ―I don‘t think I have any need for it,‖ said another.
Barriers to Utilization of DBEs in New Jersey Department of Transportation Contracts 29
Barriers to Subcontracting All of the DBE respondents acknowledged that there were some significant barriers that new
DBE firms encountered while trying to get a subcontract with a Prime on a NJ DOT contract. As might be expected, having a track record with specific Prime Contractors was the most important factor to those who were successful in getting subcontracts, and was seen as the greatest barrier to those who had not.
When asked why they had not performed any work for Primes on NJ DOT contracts, several respondents in this group mentioned the lack of prior relationships with Primes.
―Most Prime Contractors have worked with DBEs who they are comfortable with, so they don‘t give us an opportunity.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .