Amendment_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

See Block 14

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE SPE603 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SPE60318R0529

X

2018 JUL 02

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of OffersX is extended, is not extended.

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning

DLA ENERGY

BULK PETROLEUM SERVICES

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD

FORT BELVOIR VA 22060

15C. DATE SIGNED 16C. DATE SIGNED

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

Opening/Closing Date Changed to:

2018 JUL 02 / 2018 AUG 24

TIME 1:00 PM

See Attached Continuation Sheet(s).

(X)

CHECK ONE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED: PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES

SPE60318R0529 - 0001

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

The purpose of Amendment 0001 is to:

1.) Incorporate the revised Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment I).

2.) The “Add The Following to Description” under www.fbo.gov is revised as follow:

Questions pertaining to the solicitation should be submitted via email to wing.wong@dla.mil no later than August 13, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. Ft. Belvoir, VA time. Responses will be posted as an amendment to the solicitation. PLEASE note solicitation number and location in subject of email.

3.) L-0006 L198 PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE (SERVICES) (DLA ENERGY FEB 2009) is revised as follow:

L-0006 L198 PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE (SERVICES) (DLA ENERGY FEB 2009)

A Preproposal conference, in conjunction with the site visit, will be held to provide offerors an opportunity to be briefed on the work covered by the solicitation. Attendance at the conference is strongly encouraged. Any comments/ remarks made by Government representatives at the conference should not be construed as a change. Any changes in terms or conditions must be accomplished by a written amendment to the solicitation. Offerors planning to attend are requested to submit to the Contract Specialist: Wing Yi Wong by email: wing.wong@dla.mil the name(s) of the individual

(s) who plan to attend by August 1, 2018, 1:00 P.M., Local Ft. Belvoir VA Time.

The conference date and time is as set forth below:

DATE

August 8-Augst 9, 2018

TIME

08:30am

LOCATION

JB Lewis McChord & Yakima, WA

404th Supply Division Building 9630 ROOM 104 (Attachment II - Map for direction)

Conference Room Location: 404th Supply Division Building 9630 Room 104,JB Lewis McChord & Yakima, WA If you do not possess a CAC, please fill out and Form ___N/A________ and submit to the Contract Specialist: Wing Yi Wong by email: wing.wong@dla.mil NLT __N/A__________, 1:00 P.M., Local Ft. Belvoir Time.

The Government will not be liable for expenses incurred by an offeror prior to contract award.

Offerors are cautioned that remarks and explanations provided at the conference shall not change the terms of this solicitation unless the solicitation is amended in writing.

NOTE: Any additional questions pertaining to the solicitation must be in writing to wing.wong@dla.mil no later than August 13, 2018. Answers to technical questions will be posted to FBO as an amendment to the solicitation.

Please submit questions in a word document. Please note solicitation number and location in subject of email.

4.) Offers are due no later than August 24, 2018 to DLA Energy – FESAB at 1:00 PM Ft. Belvoir, Virginia time.

5.) All termsand conditions remain the same.

CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED: PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES

SPE60318R0529 - 0001

Attachments

List of Attachments

File Name Description ATTACH_Attachment I -

PPQ

TAB 9 (SOLI

ATTACH_Attachment II - Map

TAB 9 (SOLI

ATTACHMENT V – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

SPE603-18-R-0529

LEWIS MCCHORD, WA

ATTACHMENT I

SECTION J

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

(PPQ)

JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD AND YAKIMA TRAINING CENTER, WA

Attachment 4 – Past Performance

JB Lewis McChord, WA

Contract Specialist: wing.wong@dla.mil, and 571-767-9327

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ATTACHMENT I

SOLICITATION SPE603-18-R-0529

CONTRACT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

GENERAL INFORMATION (Offeror to complete this portion)

Contractor Name (Name of Company or Organization)

Name of Point of Contact/Email Address Phone Number Original Contract Price

Name of Contractor Contract Number Period of Performance

Contract Dates Contract Type Worked Performed as: Complexity of Work

Award Date: __________________

Contract Comp. Date: __________

Actual Comp. Date: ___________

Firm Fixed Price

Cost Reimbursement

Other ________________

Prime Contractor

Sub-Contractor

Prime Name: ______________

Joint Venture

High

Medium

Low

Brief Description of work/supplies furnished to Customer

CLIENT INFORMATION (Reference to complete this portion)

Client Information

Name of Person Interviewed / Completing Questionnaire Title Email Address

Client’s Signature and Date

PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM WITH THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO:

JB Lewis McChord, WA

GENERAL GUIDANCE FOR COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE

A. The questionnaire should be completed by the individual most knowledgeable of the Contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of service being rendered. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in their organization, as applicable.

B. Handwritten responses are sufficient. However, request they be legible.

C. Please provide explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible. These narratives need not be lengthy, just descriptive. Space for narrative comments is included after each question and on the last page of the survey. If more space is needed, use the back of the survey or attach additional pages.

D. As the survey relates to an ongoing source selection for the services identified in the cover letter, request that all information provided within the survey be safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure.

E. The following description should be used as a guide in providing element ratings:

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOTE: The adjectival ratings Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unacceptable reflect the ratings in the Contractor Performance Rating System (CPARS). However under the DOD’s streamlined process for evaluating Past Performance under Lowest Price Technically Acceptable, ratings of Acceptable and Unacceptable must be used. Therefore the Contracting Officer has determined that CPARS/Survey ratings of Exceptional, Very

Good and Satisfactory will equate to an Acceptable rating. Ratings of Marginal and Unacceptable will equate to an

Unacceptable rating.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

JB Lewis McChord, WAPage 3 of 5 Contractor Performance Assessment Input Form

Please assess the above contractor’s performance in the below areas. The narrative should include positive and negative statements to match the rating below each section.

1. Quality of Service: Assessment based on the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship to include ability to accommodate change. (I.e. Did the contractor exhibit knowledge of/ and comply with Government (or other) regulations? Demonstrate technical expertise in providing all contractual services? Utilized personnel or possess/utilize tools/equipment necessary to adequately provide the services? Show Cause or Cure Notice or Discrepancy Report ever been issued? Terminated for Default? Display ability to correct problems? Meet standards for Technical Performance/Administrative Performance/Safety &

Health.)

Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:

____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable

2. Schedule: Assessment based on the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements to include responding to any correspondences. (I.e. were tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract? Was contractor responsive to technical and/or contractual direction? Was he compliant with contract terms and conditions? Were any contract concessions/changes/terminations made due to the contractor's failure to accurately plan?)

Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:

____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

JB Lewis McChord, WA

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

3. Cost Control: Assessment based on the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost, employ adequate budgetary internal controls. If the contract is Firm-Fixed Price or Firm-Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment, please mark “Not Applicable”. (I.e. Did contractor perform the effort within the estimated cost/price? Provide accurate and complete billings? Submit accurate invoices on a timely basis?

Demonstrate cost efficiencies in performing the required effort?)

Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:

____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable

4. Management of Key Personnel: Assessment based on the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel. (I.e. Is contractor managing subcontractors in order to meet the requirements of the contract? Did the contractor train personnel? Was the labor turnover in key personnel labor categories minimal? Did it adversely affect/or not the contractor’s performance? Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract who were clearly unqualified.)

Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:

____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable

JB Lewis McChord, WA

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

5. Small Business: (This area applies only to domestic contracts.) Is the contractor in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract related to small business participation. Is the contractor meeting small business goals? Is the contractor making a good faith effort to meet small business subcontracting goals?

Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:

____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable

6. Regulatory Compliance: Is the contractor in compliance with all regulations and codes regarding financial, environmental, labor, and safety. Is the contractor meeting the reporting requirements in a timely manner?

Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:

____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable

7. Business Relationships: Has the contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed?

Maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or CO/CS is apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues? Presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner?

Promptly notified the COR/CS/CO in a timely manner regarding urgent issues? What do you think of the contractor’s overall performance?

Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:

____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable

From I-5 going south take exit 123 and go left at the top of the ramp

Follow that road straight through the roundabout to the Log Center Gate

Attachment II - Map

After the gate, there is a four way stop. You will take a left on to Rainier Drive

Follow Rainier DR to South I Street and turn Right

Bui Building 9630 Entry Parking