Amendment0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

See Block 14

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE SPE600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SPE60016R0527

X

2016 SEP 29

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of OffersX is extended, X is not extended.

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning

DLA ENERGY

8725 JOHN J KINGMAN RD STE 4950

FT BELVOIR VA 22060-6222

USA

15C. DATE SIGNED 16C. DATE SIGNED

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

10/05/2016

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

See Attached Continuation Sheet(s).

(X)

CHECK ONE

PAGE OF PAGES

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

SPE600-16-R-0527

Corpus Christi, TX

Amendment 0001

A. Amendment 0001 under solicitation SPE600-16-R-0527, dated September 29, 2016 is hereby issued to incorporate the following changes:

1. Page 3, paragraph D. is revised to correct the number of volumes required and should read as follows:

D. FAXED PROPOSALS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED. Please e-mail your proposal to:

bidcustodian@dla.mil. All e-mail proposals MUST be followed-up with the hard copy (consisting of three volumes as outlined below) NO LATER THAN (5) business days after solicitation closing. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208 – Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals.

Offeror’s proposals shall be prepared in three separate volumes and provided in the quantities shown below:

Volume Title No. of Copies Required Page Limit I Technical Proposal 1 original and 1 PDF electronic copy 70 II Offeror Submission

Package (OSP) includes Price Proposal

1 original and 1 PDF electronic copy of Attachment II – OFFEROR SUBMISSION

PACKAGE

None

III Past Performance (PPQ) I PDF electronic copy None

2. Page 5, TABLE OF CONTENTS, SECTION B – SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS, B-0001 is revised to read B34.01 SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND PRICES (DLA ENERGY FEB 2009).

3. The following clause 252.232-7010 LEVIES ON CONTRACT PAYMENTS (DEC 2006) has been incorporated in SECTION G – CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA.

252.232-7010 LEVIES ON CONTRACT PAYMENTS (DEC 2006)

(a) 26 U.S.C. 6331(h) authorizes the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to continuously levy up to 100 percent of contract payments, up to the amount of tax debt.

(b) When a levy is imposed on a payment under this contract and the Contractor believes that the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract, the Contractor shall promptly notify the Procuring Contracting Officer in writing, with a copy to the Administrative Contracting Officer, and shall provide—

(1) The total dollar amount of the levy;

(2) A statement that the Contractor believes that the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract, including rationale and adequate supporting documentation; and

(3) Advice as to whether the inability to perform may adversely affect national security, including rationale and adequate supporting documentation.

(c) DoD shall promptly review the Contractor’s assessment, and the Procuring Contracting Officer shall provide a written notification to the Contractor including–

(1) A statement as to whether DoD agrees that the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract; and

(2)(i) If the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract and the lack of performance will adversely affect national security, the total amount of the monies collected that should be returned to the Contractor; or

(ii) If the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract but will not impact national security, a recommendation that the Contractor promptly notify the IRS to attempt to resolve the tax situation.

(d) Any DoD determination under this clause is not subject to appeal under the Contract Disputes Act.

4. The following clauses 252.211-7007 REPORTING OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY (AUG 2012), 252.215-7008 ONLY ONE OFFER (OCT 2013), 252.219-7003 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (DOD CONTRACTS) (MAR 2016) and 252.237-7010 PROHIBITION ON INTERROGATION OF DETAINEES BY CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL (JUN 2013) have been incorporated in SECTION I –

CONTRACT CLAUSES.

252.211-7007 REPORTING OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY (AUG 2012)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—

“Commercial and Government entity (CAGE) code” means—

(i) A code assigned by the Defense Logistics Agency Logistics Information Service to identify a commercial or Government entity; or

(ii) A code assigned by a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization that the Defense Logistics Agency Logistics Information Service records and maintains in the CAGE master file. The type of code is known as an “NCAGE code.”

“Contractor-acquired property” has the meaning given in FAR clause 52.245-1. Upon acceptance by the Government, contractor-acquired property becomes Government-furnished property.

“Government-furnished property” has the meaning given in FAR clause 52.245-1.

“Item unique identification (IUID)” means a system of assigning, reporting, and marking DoD property with unique item identifiers that have machine-readable data elements to distinguish an item from all other like and unlike items.

“IUID Registry” means the DoD data repository that receives input from both industry and Government sources and provides storage of, and access to, data that identifies and describes tangible Government personal property. The IUID Registry is—

(i) The authoritative source of Government unit acquisition cost for items with unique item identification (see DFARS 252.211-7003) that were acquired after January 1, 2004;

(ii) The master data source for Government-furnished property; and

(iii) An authoritative source for establishing the acquisition cost of end-item equipment.

“National stock number (NSN)” means a 13-digit stock number used to identify items of supply. It consists of a four-digit Federal Supply Code and a nine-digit National Item Identification Number.

“Nomenclature” means—

(i) The combination of a Government-assigned type designation and an approved item name;

(ii) Names assigned to kinds and groups of products; or

(iii) Formal designations assigned to products by customer or supplier (such as model number or model type, design differentiation, or specific design series or configuration).

“Part or identifying number (PIN)” means the identifier assigned by the original design activity, or by the controlling nationally recognized standard, that uniquely identifies (relative to that design activity) a specific item.

“Reparable” means an item, typically in unserviceable condition, furnished to the Contractor for maintenance, repair, modification, or overhaul.

“Serially managed item” means an item designated by DoD to be uniquely tracked, controlled, or managed in maintenance, repair, and/or supply systems by means of its serial number.

“Supply condition code” means a classification of materiel in terms of readiness for issue and use or to identify action underway to change the status of materiel (see http://www2.dla.mil/j-6/dlmso/elibrary/manuals/dlm/dlm_pubs.asp).

“Unique item identifier (UII)” means a set of data elements permanently marked on an item that is globally unique and unambiguous and never changes, in order to provide traceability of the item throughout its total life cycle. The term includes a concatenated UII or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

“Unit acquisition cost” has the meaning given in FAR clause 52.245-1.

(b) Reporting Government-furnished property to the IUID Registry. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this clause, the Contractor shall report, in accordance with paragraph (f), Government-furnished property to the IUID Registry as follows:

(1) Up to and including December 31, 2013, report serially managed Government-furnished property with a unit-acquisition cost of $5,000 or greater.

(2) Beginning January 1, 2014, report—

(i) All serially managed Government-furnished property, regardless of unit-acquisition cost; and

(ii) Contractor receipt of non-serially managed items. Unless tracked as an individual item, the Contractor shall report non-serially managed items to the Registry in the same unit of packaging, e.g., original manufacturer’s package, box, or container, as it was received.

(c) Exceptions. Paragraph (b) of this clause does not apply to–

(1) Contractor-acquired property;

(2) Property under any statutory leasing authority;

(3) Property to which the Government has acquired a lien or title solely because of partial, advance, progress, or performance-based payments;

(4) Intellectual property or software;

(5) Real property; or

(6) Property released for work in process.

(d) Data for reporting to the IUID Registry. To permit reporting of Government-furnished property to the IUID Registry, the Contractor’s property management system shall enable the following data elements in addition to those required by paragraph (f)(1)(iii) (A)(1) through (3), (5), (7), (8), and (10) of the Government Property clause of this contract

(FAR 52.245-1):

(1) Received/Sent (shipped) date.

(2) Status code.

(3) Accountable Government contract number.

(4) Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code on the accountable Government contract.

(5) Mark record.

(i) Bagged or tagged code (for items too small to individually tag or mark).

(ii) Contents (the type of information recorded on the item, e.g., item internal control number).

(iii) Effective date (date the mark is applied).

(iv) Added or removed code/flag.

(v) Marker code (designates which code is used in the marker identifier, e.g., D=CAGE, UN=DUNS, LD=DODAAC).

(vi) Marker identifier, e.g., Contractor’s CAGE code or DUNS number.

(vii) Medium code; how the data is recorded, e.g., barcode, contact memory button.

(viii) Value, e.g., actual text or data string that is recorded in its human-readable form.

(ix) Set (used to group marks when multiple sets exist).

(6) Appropriate supply condition code, required only for reporting of reparables, per Appendix 2 of DoD 4000.25-2-M, Military Standard Transaction Reporting and Accounting Procedures manual (http://www2.dla.mil/j- 6/dlmso/elibrary/manuals/dlm/dlm_pubs.asp).

(e) When Government-furnished property is in the possession of subcontractors, Contractors shall ensure that reporting is accomplished using the data elements required in paragraph (d) of this clause.

(f) Procedures for reporting of Government-furnished property. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this clause, the Contractor shall establish and report to the IUID Registry the information required by FAR clause 52.245-1, paragraphs (e) and (f)(1)(iii), in accordance with the data submission procedures at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/data_submission_information.html.

(g) Procedures for updating the IUID Registry.

(1) Except as provided in paragraph (g)(2), the Contractor shall update the IUID Registry at https://iuid.logisticsinformationservice.dla.mil/ for changes in status, mark, custody, condition code (for reparables only), or disposition of items that are—

(i) Received by the Contractor;

(ii) Delivered or shipped from the Contractor’s plant, under Government instructions, except when shipment is to a subcontractor or other location of the Contractor;

(iii) Consumed or expended, reasonably and properly, or otherwise accounted for, in the performance of the contract as determined by the Government property administrator, including reasonable inventory adjustments;

(iv) Disposed of; or

(v) Transferred to a follow-on or other contract.

(2) The Contractor need not report to the IUID Registry those transactions reported or to be reported to the following DCMA etools:

(i) Plant Clearance Automated Reutilization and Screening System (PCARSS); or

(ii) Lost, Theft, Damaged or Destroyed (LTDD) system.

(3) The contractor shall update the IUID Registry as transactions occur or as otherwise stated in the Contractor’s property management procedure.

252.215-7008 ONLY ONE OFFER (OCT 2013)

(a) After initial submission of offers, the Offeror agrees to submit any subsequently requested additional cost or pricing data if the Contracting Officer notifies the offeror that—

(1) Only one offer was received; and

(2) Additional cost or pricing data is required in order to determine whether the price is fair and reasonable or to comply with the statutory requirement for certified cost or pricing data (10 U.S.C. 2306a and FAR 15.403-3).

(b) Requirement for submission of additional cost or pricing data. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this provision, the Offeror shall submit additional cost or pricing data as follows:

(1) If the Contracting Officer notifies the Offeror that additional cost or pricing data are required in accordance with paragraph (a) of this clause, the data shall be certified unless an exception applies (FAR 15.403-1(b)).

(2) Exceptions from certified cost or pricing data. In lieu of submitting certified cost or pricing data, the Offeror may submit a written request for exception by submitting the information described in the following paragraphs. The Contracting Officer may require additional supporting information, but only to the extent necessary to determine whether an exception should be granted, and whether the price is fair and reasonable.

(i) Identification of the law or regulation establishing the price offered. If the price is controlled under law by periodic rulings, reviews, or similar actions of a governmental body, attach a copy of the controlling document, unless it was previously submitted to the contracting office.

(ii) Commercial item exception. For a commercial item exception, the Offeror shall submit, at a minimum, information on prices at which the same item or/ similar items have previously been sold in the commercial market that is adequate for evaluating the reasonableness of the price for this acquisition. Such information may include—

(A) For catalog items, a copy of or identification of the catalog and its date, or the appropriate pages for the offered items, or a statement that the catalog is on file in the buying office to which the proposal is being submitted. Provide a copy or describe current discount policies and price lists (published or unpublished), e.g., wholesale, original equipment manufacturer, or reseller. Also explain the basis of each offered price and its relationship to the established catalog price, including how the proposed price relates to the price of recent sales in quantities similar to the proposed quantities;

(B) For market-priced items, the source and date or period of the market quotation or other basis for market price, the base amount, and applicable discounts. In addition, describe the nature of the market; or

(C) For items included on an active Federal Supply Service Multiple Award Schedule contract, proof that an exception has been granted for the schedule item.

(3) The Offeror grants the Contracting Officer or an authorized representative the right to examine, at any time before award, books, records, documents, or other directly pertinent records to verify any request for an exception under this provision, and the reasonableness of price. For items priced using catalog or market prices, or law or regulation, access does not extend to cost or profit information or other data relevant solely to the Offeror’s determination of the prices to be offered in the catalog or marketplace.

(4) Requirements for certified cost or pricing data. If the Offeror is not granted an exception from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing data, the following applies:

(i) The Offeror shall prepare and submit certified cost or pricing data and supporting attachments in accordance with the instructions contained in Table 15-2 of FAR 15.408, which is incorporated by reference with the same force and effect as though it were inserted here in full text. The instructions in Table 15-2 are incorporated as a mandatory format to be used, unless the Contracting Officer and the Offeror agree to a different format.

(ii) As soon as practicable after agreement on price, but before contract award (except for unpriced actions such as letter contracts), the offeror shall submit a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data, as prescribed by FAR 15.406-2.

(c) If the Offeror is the Canadian Commercial Corporation, certified cost or pricing data are not required. If the Contracting Officer notifies the Canadian Commercial Corporation that additional data other than certified cost or pricing data are required in accordance with 225.870-4(c), the Canadian Commercial Corporation shall obtain and provide the following:

(1) Profit rate or fee (as applicable).

(2) Analysis provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada to the Canadian Commercial Corporation to determine a fair and reasonable price (comparable to the analysis required at FAR 15.404-1).

(3) Data other than certified cost or pricing data necessary to permit a determination by the U.S. Contracting Officer that the proposed price is fair and reasonable [U.S. Contracting Officer to provide description of the data required in accordance with FAR 15.403-3(a)(1) with the notification].

(4) As specified in FAR 15.403-3(a)(4), an offeror who does not comply with a requirement to submit data that the U.S. Contracting Officer has deemed necessary to determine price reasonableness or cost realism is ineligible for award unless the head of the contracting activity determines that it is in the best interest of the Government to make the award to that offeror.

(d) If negotiations are conducted, the negotiated price should not exceed the offered price.

252.219-7003 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (DOD CONTRACTS) (MAR 2016)

This clause supplements the Federal Acquisition Regulation 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, clause of this contract.

(a) Definitions. “Summary Subcontract Report (SSR) Coordinator,” as used in this clause, means the individual at the department or agency level who is registered in the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) and is responsible for acknowledging receipt or rejecting SSRs in eSRS for the department or agency.

(b) Subcontracts awarded to workshops approved by the Committee for Purchase from People Who are Blind or Severely Disabled (41 U.S.C. 8502-8504), may be counted toward the Contractor’s small business subcontracting goal.

(c) A mentor firm, under the Pilot Mentor-Protege Program established under section 831 of Public Law 101-510, as amended, may count toward its small disadvantaged business goal, subcontracts awarded to—

(1) Protege firms which are qualified organizations employing the severely disabled; and

(2) Former protege firms that meet the criteria in section 831(g)(4) of Public Law 101-510.

(d) The master plan is approved by the Contractor's cognizant contract administration activity.

(e) In those subcontracting plans which specifically identify small businesses, the Contractor shall notify the Administrative Contracting Officer of any substitutions of firms that are not small business firms, for the small business firms specifically identified in the subcontracting plan. Notifications shall be in writing and shall occur within a reasonable period of time after award of the subcontract. Contractor-specified formats shall be acceptable.

(f)(1) For DoD, the Contractor shall submit reports in eSRS as follows:

(i) The Individual Subcontract Report (ISR) shall be submitted to the contracting officer at the procuring contracting office, even when contract administration has been delegated to the Defense Contract Management Agency.

(ii) An SSR for other than a commercial subcontracting plan, or construction and related maintenance repair contracts, shall be submitted in eSRS to the department or agency within DoD that administers the majority of the Contractor’s individual subcontracting plans. An example would be Defense Finance and Accounting Service or Missile Defense Agency.

(2) For DoD, the authority to acknowledge receipt or reject reports in eSRS is as follows:

(i) The authority to acknowledge receipt or reject the ISR resides with the contracting officer who receives it, as described in paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this clause.

(ii) Except as provided in (f)(2)(iii), the authority to acknowledge receipt or reject SSRs in eSRS resides with the SSR Coordinator at the department or agency that administers the majority of the Contractor’s individual subcontracting plans.

(iii) The authority to acknowledge receipt or reject SSRs for construction and related maintenance and repair contracts resides with the SSR Coordinator for each department or agency.

252.237-7010 PROHIBITION ON INTERROGATION OF DETAINEES BY CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL (JUN 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause— “Detainee” means any person captured, detained, held, or otherwise under the effective control of DoD personnel (military or civilian) in connection with hostilities. This includes, but is not limited to, enemy prisoners of war, civilian internees, and retained personnel. This does not include DoD personnel or DoD contractor personnel being held for law enforcement purposes.

“Interrogation of detainees” means a systematic process of formally and officially questioning a detainee for the purpose of obtaining reliable information to satisfy foreign intelligence collection requirements.

(b) Contractor personnel shall not interrogate detainees.

(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts, including subcontracts for commercial items, that may require subcontractor personnel to interact with detainees in the course of their duties.

5. The following clause 52.222-24 – PREAWARD ON-SITE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE EVALUATION (FEB 1999) has been incorporated in SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS.

52.222-24 – PREAWARD ON-SITE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE EVALUATION (FEB 1999)

If a contract in the amount of $10 million or more will result from this solicitation, the prospective Contractor and its known first-tier subcontractors with anticipated subcontracts of $10 million or more shall be subject to a preaward compliance evaluation by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), unless, within the preceding 24 months, OFCCP has conducted an evaluation and found the prospective Contractor and subcontractors to be in compliance with Executive Order 11246.

6. Page 82, SECTION J - ATTACHMENTS, Attachment IV should read as follows…ATTACHMENT IV - DLA ENERGY FORM 2019 Business Subcontracting Plan.

7. Page 101, ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (SEP 2016) paragraph a) is revised to the correct number of volumes required and should read as follows:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (SEP 2016)

Award will be made on the basis of the proposal that conforms to the solicitation and is determined to be the “Best Value” to the Government. The Government will establish a competitive range comprised of all of the highly rated proposals. The competitive range may be further reduced for purposes of efficiency (IAW FAR 15.306(c)(2) – Exchanges with Offerors after Receipt of Proposals). This solicitation does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal or for any other costs incurred by any firm submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation.

a) Offeror’s proposals shall be prepared in three separate volumes and provided in the quantities shown below. Technical/Management proposals shall provide information following the technical proposal factors format. Proposals that do not provide the required information in the prescribed format may be excluded from further consideration.

Volume Title No. of Copies Required Page

Limit I Technical Proposal 1 hard copy and 1 PDF electronic copy 70 II Offeror Submission Package

(OSP) includes Price Proposal

1 original, 1 hard copy and 1 PDF electronic copy of Attachment II – OFFEROR

SUBMISSION PACKAGE

None

III Past Performance 1 PDF electronic copy None

8. Page 105, Note listed under Volume III- Past Performance should read as follows: Note: Offers submitted by Small Businesses need to address this in their proposal, however the DLA Energy Form DLA Energy Form 2019 Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required.

9. Page 108, DLA Energy Provision L73 Inspection of Premises (AARD) (DLA Energy Feb 1970) has been deleted in its entirety from this solicitation.

10. This amendment to the solicitation provides a detailed schedule for the pre-proposal conference and site visits.

L-0006 L198 PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE (SERVICES) (DLA ENERGY FEB 2009)

The Preproposal conference, in conjunction with the site visits, will be held to provide offerors an opportunity to be briefed on the work covered by the solicitation. Attendance at the conference is strongly encouraged. Any comments/remarks made by Government representatives at the conference should not be construed as a change. Any changes in terms or conditions must be accomplished by a written amendment to the solicitation. Offerors are requested to submit acceptance to the Contracting Officer by letter, telephone, facsimile, or email of the name(s) of the individual(s) who plan to attend. Attendance is limited to a maximum of two (2) representatives per company.

The conference date and time is as set forth below:

DATE TIME LOCATION

October 19, 2016 0900 HRS Naval Air Station Corpus Christi

9035 Ocean Drive Bldg. 10, 3rd Floor

Corpus Christi, TX 78419

Attendee Registration Requirements- Offerors that do not possess a valid CAC and /or military ID (retiree, etc) will be required to present a second for of ID (i.e driver’s license, etc). For vehicles to gain temporary access to installation (escorted on), a copy of the vehicle registration will be required.

Note: If you do not have a CAC card the location will be the Pass & ID office parking lot at the Main Gate 1794 Lexington Rd, Corpus Christi, TX 78419. If you need my number as a contact number, it is cell: (425)419-7303.

To arrange attendance, prospective offerors are requested to contact:

Name: Dyeshia Sampson

Telephone: 703-767-9346

E-mail address: Dyeshia.1.sampson@dla.mil

Prospective offerors are requested to submit questions regarding the solicitation in writing via electronic mail to the above e-mail address five (5) days in advance of the conference to allow their inclusion in the agenda. Questions will be considered at any time prior to or during the conference; however, offerors will be asked to confirm verbal questions in writing.

The Government will not be liable for expenses incurred by an offeror prior to contract award.

Offerors are cautioned that remarks and explanations provided at the conference shall not change the terms of this solicitation unless the solicitation is amended in writing. Offerors may obtain a copy of the conference minutes from the Contracting Officer.

NOTE: Any additional technical questions pertaining to the solicitation must be in writing to dyeshia.1.sampson@dla.mil no later than October 24, 2016. Answers to technical questions will be posted to FBO as an amendment to the solicitation. Please submit new questions in a word document, questions submitted prior to this amendment will not be answered. PLEASE note solicitation number and location in subject of email.

11. Page 110, ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 – EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (SEP 2016) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the language below:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 – EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (SEP 2016)

Basis for Award. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

There are three (3) evaluation factors: Factor 1-Technical/Management, Factor 2-Past Performance, and Factor 3- Price.

Awards will be made using formal source selection procedures with lowest price technically acceptable process in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) shall make final selections based on an overall assessment of each offerors' technical/management, past performance and price proposals. The resultant contracts shall represent the best overall value to the Government, after consideration of technical/management factors, past performance and price in accordance with the evaluations clause FAR 52.212 EVALUATIONS OF

OFFERS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999).

The Source Selection Authority will make the final decision as to which offeror will receive the award based on the Best Value offer.

Factor 1: Technical/Management The ratings are established in accordance with Clause FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) and DLA Energy Contract Provision M-001-M72-EVALUATION OF OFFERS (EXCEPTIONS/DEVIATIONS) (DLA Energy, APR 1997). All seven sub-factors are equal in importance to each other. After all sub-factors have been rated, an overall Technical/Management rating will be assigned to the proposals to assure technical capability.

Table A-1

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

RATING DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

The sub-factors under Factor 1 – Technical/Management (Table A-1.1) to be addressed in the Technical Proposal are as follows:

Table A-1.1

Sub-factor 1 - Staffing: Technical, managerial, and operational details of manpower related issues to meet mission requirements. The proposal must provide a staffing approach which demonstrates understanding of the personnel requirements to successfully accomplish all PWS tasks. The proposal must provide a staffing matrix identifying manning by positions and shifts to perform all required tasks and cover required hours of operation for normal daily operations. The proposal must identify all required personnel positions and qualifications. The proposal must address requirements to respond to surge or contingency operations to ensure no mission delay or failure. The proposal must address any manpower issues such as compliance with Service specific requirements, impact of Status of Forces Agreements, recognition of security clearance requirements, or negotiating a Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Sub-factor 2 - Operations: Technical, managerial, and operational details of supporting normal and contingency operations to meet mission requirements. The proposal must provide a concept of operations that demonstrates knowledge of product receipt, storage, issue, and transfer functions and should ensure requirements for normal daily operations are met. The proposal must address procedures to maintain accountability and quality of DWCF product which will ensure compliance with DLA Energy Policies.

Sub-factor 3 - Maintenance: Technical, managerial, and operational details of maintaining operational capability of facilities, vehicles, and equipment to meet mission requirements. The proposal must demonstrate understanding of planning, conducting, monitoring, and documenting operator, preventive, and other maintenance of systems, equipment, buildings, and grounds as required and in accordance with regulations and best commercial practices.

Sub-factor 4 - Safety: Technical, managerial, and operational details incorporating federal, state, and local laws and regulations to ensure safe working environment. The proposal must provide procedures to be implemented to ensure all operations are conducted in accordance with federal, state, local, and international safety laws, regulations, and best commercial practices. The proposal must demonstrate knowledge and understanding of safety issues and specifically address hazards of products, lockout/tagout procedures, and confined space work rules.

Sub-factor 5 - Security: Technical, managerial, and operational details of meeting physical, information, and personnel security requirements. The proposal must provide procedures to be implemented to ensure all aspects of security are maintained. The proposal must indicate a good knowledge of security performance requirements and must specifically address key control, visitor access control, Force Protection condition requirements, contractor personnel security/background checks, and protection of government computer systems and information.

SUB-FACTORS ACCEPTABLE UNACCCEPABLE

Staffing

Operations

Maintenance

Safety

Security

Environmental

Training

OVERALL RATING

Sub-factor 6 - Environmental: Technical, managerial, and operational details of planning and conducting operations in compliance with environmental laws and regulations.The proposal must provide environmental performance requirements details and must specifically address spill prevention and response pertaining to fuel receipt, storage, and issue operations to be to ensure strict compliance with all applicable base, local, state, federal, and international environmental laws, regulations, and plans.

Sub-factor 7 - Training: Technical, managerial, and operational details to ensure contractor personnel have requisite skills and associated training to accomplish all government requirements. The proposal must provide procedures to be implemented to ensure all contractor personnel are qualified and certified to accomplish all required tasks. The proposal must identify required courses and frequencies for maintaining personnel competence and method of documentation and certification. The proposal must also address the requirements for providing training to government personnel.

Negotiations will be held with those offerors determined to be within the competitive range. Questions and/or comments will be addressed during negotiations. The offeror must provide additional written details for any questions and/or exceptions by the date set for submission of the Final Proposal Revision.

Note: Any offeror who receives an overall Technical/Management rating of Unacceptable after final proposal revisions will not be eligible for an award.

FACTOR 2. PAST PERFORMANCE: Past Performance will be rated as Acceptable or Unacceptable. To be considered awardable, offerors must have an Acceptable Past Performance rating.

Offerors are instructed to submit three (3) Past Performance Questionnaires that may include the performance still in progress, however, it should have a minimum of one (1) year of performance history and no more than three (3) years old from the closing date of this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s submitted past performance to include questionnaire from (3) current or previous contracts for relevancy based on how well the contractor performed on projects of similar dollar value, scope, and complexity. The Past Performance questionnaire located Attachment B of this solicitation will be used to solicit information from Offeror’s submitted references in the following area: (1) Quality of Service (2) Schedule (3) Cost Controls (4) Management of Key Personnel, (5) Small Business (if applicable) and (6) Regulatory Compliance.

Past Performance factor shall be evaluated using the following adjectival ratings:

Table A-2

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

RATING DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE 1: The adjectival ratings Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unacceptable reflect the ratings in the Contractor Performance Rating System (CPARS). However, under the DOD’s streamlined process for evaluating Past Performance under Lowest Price Technically Acceptable, ratings of Acceptable and Unacceptable must be used. The contracting officer has reviewed the CPARs rating standards at https://www.cpars.gov/pdfs/CPARSQualityChecklist.pdf and the Contractor Past Performance Questionnaire, Attachment B, and determined that CPARS and Questionnaire ratings of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory and Marginal will equate to an Acceptable rating. Ratings of Unacceptable will equate to an Unacceptable rating.

A record of poor performance may be considered an indication that the offeror has failed to conform to contract requirements and/or to standards of good workmanship; adhere to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance; provide reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction;

and/or display a business-like concern for the interests of the customer. Offerors are advised that the Government may use past performance information obtained from centralized past performance databases and sources other than those identified by the offeror.

Recency and Relevancy are evaluated as part of the Acceptable/Unacceptable ratings. Recent past performance is defined as past performance on contracts performed within the past three years. The evaluation will determine the degree to which a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is relevant to the effort to be acquired through this acquisition. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration shall be given to those aspects of an offeror’s contract history that would give the greatest ability to measure whether the offeror will satisfy the current procurement. This relevancy assessment shall measure the extent of similarity between the service effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming arrangements, and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance. Relevancy and non-relevancy are defined in Table A-3 below.

Table A-3

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

RATING DEFINITION

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Upon determining how recent past performance was, relevancy, and how well the offeror performed, past performance will be rated “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” using the ratings and descriptions outlined in the DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table A-3 as follows:

Note 2: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability, “Unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable”.

Evaluation for Joint Ventures and Teaming Arrangements will be performed by evaluating the performance of each partner in accordance with the procedures outlined above. The ratings for each partner will be combined and the Joint Venture or Teaming Arrangement will receive one rating.

Note 3: A Past Performance evaluation rating of Acceptable shall be required in order to be considered for award.

Factor 3: Price

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract will result from this solicitation. The Contract Team members of the SSEB will perform the evaluation of the offered prices. Price will always be evaluated for reasonableness. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes IAW FAR 52.212-2 – Evaluation – Commercial Items as follows:

1. A total M1GC price offered for Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0001 (Base years 1-4 ) will be multiplied by 48 months. The total M1GC price for the option period under CLIN 0002 (Option years 5-9) will be multiplied by 60 months. Option (Extension Provision) price: In accordance with FAR 52.217-8 (NOV 1999), Option to Extend Services, the Government has the unilateral right to extend any resulting contract under the same terms and conditions for a total of not more than six months. To account for the option period (s) possible under 52.217-8 (maximum of six months), the Government will evaluate the option to extend by adding six months of the Offeror’s performance period price to the Offeror’s total price.

2. Option price: In Accordance with FAR 52.217-9 (MAR 2000) Option to Extend the Term of the Contract, the Government may extend the term of this contract by written notice to the Contractor within thirty (30) days;

provided the Government gives the contractor a preliminary written notice of its intent to extend at least sixty (60) days before the contract expires. The preliminary notice does not commit the Government to an extension.

The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced.

Evaluation of options does not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

The Government reserves the right to perform a price realism analysis to determine whether the offeror understands the requirements and to determine the firm’s responsibility IAW FAR 9.104-1(b). If price realism is performed and an unfavorable determination is made, the Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest price offeror.

Competitive Range:

The Government reserves the right to limit the number of offers included in the competitive range for the purposes of efficiency in accordance with FAR 15.306(c)(2).

IAW 52.219-4, NOTICE OF PRICE EVALUATION PREFERENCE FOR HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS

CONCERN (OCT 2014), offerors will be evaluated by adding a factor of 10 percent to the price of all offers unless the exceptions under Paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) applies (see FAR 52.219-4).

Socioeconomic/ Subcontracting Plan: The offeror (if a large business) shall complete and submit the DLA Energy Form 2019 (Attachment IV) to describe the extent of any planned subcontracting with small, small disadvantaged, veteran-owned small, service- disabled veteran- owned small, and HUBZone small businesses and Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions. Figures stated on the DLA Energy Form 2019 should refer to intended subcontracted amounts for the base period only.

B. This Amendment 0001 also incorporates changes within the OSP as follows:

1. Page 3, QUESTIONS should read as follows:

QUESTIONS:

Questions should be submitted via email to Dyeshia.1.Sampson@dla.mil no later than 9:00 A.M. Fort Belvoir time on October 24, 2016. Please annotate the solicitation number and installation in subject of email.

2. Page 3, INSTRUCTIONS has been revised to correct the following items:

Page 3, Item No. 2. Check all offered prices in Section B-0001 B34.01 SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND PRICES (DLA Energy FEB 2009) for accuracy and legibility prior to submission. Initial any changes. Sign and date the Standard Form 1449 (SF 1449) in ink.

Pages 3-4, Item No. 4. is revised to correct the number of volumes required and should read as follows:

4. FAXED PROPOSALS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED. Please e-mail your proposal to:

bidcustodian@dla.mil. All e-mail proposals MUST be followed-up with the hard copy (consisting of three volumes as outlined below) NO LATER THAN (5) business days after solicitation closing.

Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208 – Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals. Offeror’s proposals shall be prepared in three separate volumes and provided in the quantities shown below:

Volume Title No. of Copies Required Page Limit I Technical Proposal 1 original and 1 PDF electronic copy 70 II Offeror Submission

Package (OSP) includes Price Proposal

1 original and 1 PDF electronic copy of Attachment II – OFFEROR SUBMISSION

PACKAGE

None

III Past Performance (PPQ) I PDF electronic copy None

Page 4, The following sentence has been deleted in its entirety. “Note: In order to be considered for an award for a location, an offeror must submit both a technical proposal and a properly completed Clause B- 0001 B34.01 price proposal for that location.”

Page 4, Item No. 5. A pre-proposal conference is scheduled at Corpus Christi, TX October 19th, 2016 for this solicitation. Interested parties planning to attend should submit names, phone numbers, email addresses, and company represented to Dyeshia Sampson via email at Dyeshia.1.Sampson@dla.mil by October 4, 2016, 12:00 PM EST.

3. Page 5, TABLE OF CONTENTS, SECTION B – SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS, B-0001 is revised to read B34.01 SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND PRICES (DLA ENERGY FEB 2009).

4. Page 10, SECTION J - ATTACHMENTS, Attachment IV should read as follows…ATTACHMENT IV - DLA ENERGY FORM 2019 Business Subcontracting Plan.

5. Clause 252.232-7010 LEVIES ON CONTRACT PAYMENTS (DEC 2006) has been incorporated in SECTION

G – CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA.

C. All other terms and conditions remain the same.