Attachment 7 - Questions and Answers.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 1 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SP470325B0002
- Issued by
-
Defense Logistics Agency
About this file
This document is a comprehensive Questions and Answers (Q&A) spreadsheet for two related hangar modification projects at Laughlin Air Force Base (LAFB), specifically for Hangars B50 and B210, in preparation for T-7A aircraft modifications. The Q&A covers multiple technical disciplines including structural, mechanical, electrical, architectural, and hazardous material testing, with responses from government representatives addressing specific design scope, testing limits, equipment requirements, and clarifications about project boundaries.
Key details include modifications to accommodate T-7A aircraft towing, parking, and servicing, with a focus on limited renovations within a $1.9M budget. Responses clarify that the projects will include specific repairs like CMU wall repairs, but exclude broader structural issues like roofing and foundation repairs. Hazardous material testing will be limited to renovation areas, primarily focusing on lead-based paint and asbestos containing materials. The projects require design submittals at various stages (35%, 65%, 95%, 100%), with responses indicating compliance with Executive Order 14057's all-electric requirements and specific technical specifications for mechanical and electrical systems.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Modify Hangar B50
| Item # | Discipline | Initiatior | RFP Section | Request for Information | Response | Status | Subitted to 47th FTW |
| 1 | General | Miller | Statement of Objective (SOO) | Please provide project approved DD1391 | Approved DD1391 shall be provided after contract award. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 2 | General | Miller | SOO Para 1.1.1 | Section states that modifications are only to include what is required to tow, park and service the T-7A. Please confirm this means no design work is expected outside modification to the hangar area and support mechanical and electrical room. Exterior facility roof, building envelope, corrosion control and structrural deficiencies noted in Attach B - LAFB Strcutrual Investigation are not part of the design scope. | The scope for project will include modifications to tow, park, and service the T-7A. Additionally, as noted in Attach B - LAFB Structural Investigation, repairs to the CMU will be necessary. No additional repairs such as roofing and foundaition feather cracks will need to be addressed. The structure must be able to support all T-7A requirements. A re-performance of the structural analysis will be needed to determine if additional support is required. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 3 | General | Miller | B50 FIre Suppression Reconfiguration | Please confirm if intent is to coordinate this deisgn with previous reconfiguration of the fire supression system to implement sundown policy. | The intent of this design is to compliment the design of MXDP 22-1013 100% Design . Please reference design package attachment. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 4 | Hazardous Material Testing | Miller | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | Please provide the limits of the LBP and ACM testing. Is it for the entire facility or limited to the areas to modified in this design. Please provide any existing Hazardous Materail Testing Reports previously accomplished for the facilities. | Hazardous material testing shall be limited to areas disturbed due to the design/construction of this scope of work only. Please reference HazMat reports but do not rely on their results if tests are older than 2021. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 5 | Production Drawings | Miller | SOO | Existing floor plan layouts were provided with CUI markings. Please confirm if design documents are required to be marked simiarly. The SOO does not state any production will be required to be marked CUI. | Design documents are not required to be marked CUI. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 6 | General | Miller | SOO Para 2.2 | Section states that "both facilities meet the general requirements nneded to service the T-7A as described in Attachment C, CDRL #C250 Section 1.3.2." Please clarify if another building is included in this scope outside of B50. | Only B50 is inlcuded in the scope of this project. "Both facilities" is in reference to the similar B210 project which is seperate. Verbiage will be changed in the SOO to reduce confusion. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 7 | Hazardous Material Testing | Veale/ALPHA | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | The SOO states, "The sampling shall include, but is not limited to, Lead Based Paint (LBP) and Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). " What other hazardous materials are anticipated (e.g., PCBs, Universal Wastes, etc.)? | Lead Based Paint and Asbestos are the main hazardous matarials anticipated. We do not expect other hazardous materials. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 8 | General | L. Mendoza | SOO Para 1.1.1 | The SOO states, "The modifications are only to include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." CDRL #250 Table 1.23 recommends a 2 ton overhead bridge crane. Please confirm if a bridge crane is already present or if a new bridge crane is required as part of the design scope. | Bridge crane is not present. Inclusion into scope TBD. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 9 | Structural | L. Mendoza | SOO 2.7.1.6 | The SOO states, "The modifications are only to include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." Attach B - LAFB Structural Investigation states, "Door repairs are necessary for the large sliding doors (Figure 12 & Figure 13) so that the manual opening and closing will not continue to pose a danger to personnel. The leaves of the doors that rub on one another should be repaired. If feasible, an automated door system should be considered for the safety and benefit of the site workers. " Please confirm that Hangar Door replacement is not included as part of the design scope. | The Hangar door is not included as part of the design scope. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 10 | General | L. Mendoza | SOO Para 1.1.1 | The SOO states, "The modifications are only to include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." CDRL #250 Table 1.23 requires the Aircraft Maintenance Bay floor to slope a minimum of 0.5% towards the flight line door or trench drains. Please confirm modifications to the existing floor are not part of the design scope. | Modifications of the existing floor are not included in the design scope. Scope of work is to identify slope towards floor drains. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 11 | Structural | L. Mendoza | SOO 2.7.1.6 | A structural analysis is included as a deliverable for the 35%. What is expected to be included in the Structural Analysis? |
| Based on review of Attach B - LAFB Structural Investigation, B50 shows signs of roof leaks, slab cracking, and CMU wall step cracking/moisture migration. None of these issues appear to require a structural analysis to be conducted. | The scope for project will include modifications to tow, park, and service the T-7A. Additionally, as noted in Attach B - LAFB Structural Investigation, repairs to the CMU will be necessary. No additional repairs such as roofing and foundaition feather cracks will need to be addressed. The structure must be able to support all T-7A requirements. A complete re-performance of the structural analysis will be needed to determine if additional support is required. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |||||
| 12 | General | Stoppel | SOO Para's 2.1 and 2.7.4 | Are the "100%, issued for construction, documents to modify B50" referenced in Para 2.1 the same deliverable as the Final Design (100%) package referenced in Para 2.7.4 or are they separate deliverables with 100% IFC documents being issued after the Final Design (100%) package? | Yes, these documents are the same deliverable. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 13 | General | Janota/Ward | SOO 2.6.1.3 Attachment B Structual Investigation Report | Structural Investigation Section 2.3 indicates deficiencies for B50. Clarify the deficiencies to be addressed from the investigation which are to be included in the scope. | Repairs to the CMU, no roof or floor cracking will be included in Scope. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 14 | General | Stoppel | SOO Para 2.6.1.1 | In what design submittal(s) is the demolition plan (Para 2.6.1.1) expected to be submitted? | Similar to the Statement of Work, a draft demolition plan can be submitted with the 65% design package for review. A finalized one can be submitted with the 95%. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 15 | Architecture | Janota/Ward | SOO Para 1.3.2 | SOO Section 1.3.2 states renovation of “plumbing systems” Clarify extent of plumbing systems to renovated. Clarify whether or not this includes Toilet Room Renovations. | Bathrooms and Toilet rooms are not to be addressed. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 16 | General | Stoppel | SOO Para 2.7.3.8 | What are the requirements for the Statement of Work deliverable mentioned in Para 2.7.3.8? | The statement of work is a description of scope of work and its components to adequately execute the IFCs. If you would like to submit a draft for review, you may do so in the 65% Design Submittal. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 17 | Low Voltage | Stephenson/Cornell | SOO Para. 1.3.2 | The SOO states "The modification of B50 is expected to require the renovation design of... electrical". Confirm extents of telecommunication and security scope of work including, but not limited to, technological refresh or new installation of CAT cabling, work area outlets, headend equipment, public address equipment, CCTV equipment, CATV equipment, intercom equipment, access control equipment, instrusion detection equipment, etc. | Designer shall base scope of work on the T-7A mission bedown requirements as mentioned in th CDRLs provided. If these items are mentioned as requirements in the CDRL then these should be in the design deliverables. Confirmation of the RFI mentioned building systems existence/functionality in the facility is the responsiblity of the designer of record. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 18 | Submittals | Miller | Attachment I - Schedule of Submittals | SOO 6.1 requires A/E to submit all submittals outlined in Attachment I, Schedule of Material Stubmittals, for Government review. Within this attachment, it reference Lauglin Div 01 Specification Attachment X for EAL, AF 103, OPSEC Trng and Project Schedule, however this document is written for Construction Contractors, not AEs. Some alternations have been made to try to apply some of the sections to AEs, but inconsistently. Request clarification which requirements within the document are supposed to apply to the AE versus which seciton are to be used in development of the design specifications. | Schedule of Material Submittals as provided is appropriate for the scope of work. A The AF 103 is included in the event utilies/systems are requested for interuption and Chugach must support or geotechnical investigations are needed. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 19 | Mechanical | C. Haby | SOO 1.1.1 | SOO states that "The modifications are to only include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." CDRL#250 Table 1.23 HVAC section indicates that climate requirements shall be met for "manned spaces" when hangar doors are closed. What is the current HVAC system serving the Hangar Bay? | Confirmation of the mechanical systems existence/functionality in the facility is the responsiblity of the designer of record. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 20 | Mechanical | C. Haby | SOO 1.1.1 | SOO states that "The modifications are to only include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." CDRL#250 Table 1.23 Plumbing section indicates that Drainage systems are required for hangar door mullion pits and sliding hangar door tracks. Please confirm that modifications are not required for the existing hangar door drains. | Hangar doors are required to be 100% functional, drains provide 100% functionality so this shall be provided in this design contract. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 21 | Mechanical | C. Haby | SOO 2.6.1.7 | SOO states that "HVAC equipment shall be Trane." Is this limited to particular equipment types (i.e. AHU, Chiller, FCU etc.)? Is a Justification and Approval (J&A) provided for the sole-sourcing of the Trane equipment? | See attached J&A for Trane Chiller and its associated systems. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 22 | Mechanical | C. Haby | Mechanical General | Will mechanical systems be required to comply with all-electric requirement per EO-14057? Or will a waiver be granted? | Mechanical systems be required to comply with all-electric requirement per EO-14057 as required depending on extent of repair/renovation/replacement. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 23 | Hazardous Material Testing | Veale/ALPHA | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | Will the facilities be occupied during the environmental assessment? | Yes they will be. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 24 | Hazardous Material Testing | Veale/ALPHA | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | Will the ACM/LBP assessments include interior/exterior/roof? | Only the areas that are being renovated need to be assessed. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 25 | Hazardous Material Testing | Veale/ALPHA | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | Please clarify the “plan for any abatement” identified in 2.6.1.2 of the SOOs. Are you looking for a SpecsIntact markup, or an Asbestos Removal Plan? We have provided the SpecsIntacton several occasions; however, an Asbestos Removal Plan is typically something the abatement contractor develops and submits for approvals based on their plans to perform work. It describes in detail where, how and what work will be performed. This would not normally be something prepared by the design team. | For this project, the A/E is sampling for Hazardous Containing material and providing the findings report with the 35% Design Package. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 26 | ||||||||
| 27 | ||||||||
| 28 | ||||||||
| 29 | ||||||||
| 30 | ||||||||
| 31 | ||||||||
| 32 | ||||||||
| 33 | ||||||||
| 34 | ||||||||
| 35 | ||||||||
| 36 | ||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 39 | ||||||||
| 40 | ||||||||
| 41 | ||||||||
| 42 | ||||||||
| 43 | ||||||||
| 44 | ||||||||
| 45 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 47 | ||||||||
| 48 | ||||||||
| 49 | ||||||||
| 50 | ||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||
| 52 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 54 | ||||||||
| 55 | ||||||||
| 56 | ||||||||
| 57 | ||||||||
| 58 | ||||||||
| 59 | ||||||||
| 60 | ||||||||
| 61 | ||||||||
| 62 | ||||||||
| 63 | ||||||||
| 64 | ||||||||
| 65 | ||||||||
| 66 | ||||||||
| 67 | ||||||||
| 68 | ||||||||
| 69 | ||||||||
| 70 | ||||||||
| 71 | ||||||||
| 72 | ||||||||
| 73 | ||||||||
| 74 | ||||||||
| 75 | ||||||||
| 76 | ||||||||
| 77 | ||||||||
| 78 | ||||||||
| 79 | ||||||||
| 80 | ||||||||
| 81 | ||||||||
| 82 | ||||||||
| 83 | ||||||||
| 84 | ||||||||
| 85 | ||||||||
| 86 | ||||||||
| 87 | ||||||||
| 88 | ||||||||
| 89 | ||||||||
| 90 | ||||||||
| 91 | ||||||||
| 92 | ||||||||
| 93 | ||||||||
| 94 | ||||||||
| 95 | ||||||||
| 96 | ||||||||
| 97 | ||||||||
| 98 | ||||||||
| 99 | ||||||||
| 100 | ||||||||
| 101 | ||||||||
| 102 | ||||||||
| 103 | ||||||||
| 104 |
Modify Hangar B210
| Item # | Discipline | Initiatior | RFP Section | Request for Information | Response | Status | Subitted to 47th FTW |
| 1 | General | Miller | Statement of Objective (SOO) | Please provide project approved DD1391 | Approved DD1391 shall be provided after contract award. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 2 | General | Miller | SOO Para 1.1.1 | Section refernced requirements in Attachment C, CDRL #C250 Section 1.3.2 which describes requirements for hangar space, backshop maintenance and admin spaces. Please provide additional detials on what areas of the hangar are to be modfied within the $1.9M programed amount. Please confirm if exterior facility roof, building envelope, corrosion control and structrural deficiencies noted in Attach B - LAFB Strcutrual Investigation are not part of the design scope. | The scope for project will include modifications to tow, park, and service the T-7A. Additionally, as noted in Attach B - LAFB Structural Investigation, repairs to the CMU and to the foundation will be necessary. No additional repairs such as roofing will need to be addressed. The structure must be able to support all T-7A requirements. A re-performance of the structural analysis needed to determine if additional support is required. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 3 | Structural | Miller | LAFB Structural Investigation | What recommendations from the B210 (Hangar 2) structural analysis are to be included in the design? Report indicated requirement to reskin the rook, CMU crackign routing, repointing and sealing, hangar floor spalling and cracking. | Please include CMU cracking routing and hangar floor spalling and cracking. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 4 | Hazardous Material Testing | Miller | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | Please provide the limits of the LBP and ACM testing. Is it for the entire facility or limited to the areas to modified in this design. Please provide any existing Hazardous Materail Testing Reports previously accomplished for the facilities. | Hazardous material testing shall be limited to areas disturbed due to the design/construction of this scope of work only. Please reference HazMat reports but do not rely on their results if tests are older than 2021. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 5 | Prodeuction Drawings | Miller | SOO | Existing floor plan layouts were provided with CUI markings. Please confirm if design documents are required to be marked simiarly. The SOO does not state any production will be required to be marked CUI. | Design documents are not required to be marked CUI. | Response provided 9/17 | 16-Sep-24 |
| 6 | Hazardous Material Testing | Veale/ALPHA | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | The SOO states, "The sampling shall include, but is not limited to, Lead Based Paint (LBP) and Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). " What other hazardous materials are anticipated (e.g., PCBs, Universal Wastes, etc.)? | Lead Based Paint and Asbestos are the main hazardous matarials anticipated. We do not expect other hazardous materials. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 7 | Architectural | Janota/Ward | SOO 2.6.1.3 Attachment B Structual Investigation Report | Structural Investigation Section 2.8 indicates deficiencies for B210. Clarify the deficiencies to be addressed from the investigation which are to be included in the scope. | Repairs to the CMU, floor cracking will be included in Scope for 210. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 8 | General | Stoppel | SOO Para's 2.1 and 2.7.4 | Are the "100%, issued for construction, documents to modify B50" referenced in Para 2.1 the same deliverable as the Final Design (100%) package referenced in Para 2.7.4 or are they separate deliverables with 100% IFC documents being issued after the Final Design (100%) package? | Yes, these documents are the same deliverable. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 9 | General | Stoppel | SOO Para 2.6.1.1 | In what design submittal(s) is the demolition plan (Para 2.6.1.1) expected to be submitted? | Similar to the Statement of Work, a draft demolition plan can be submitted with the 65% design package for review. A finalized one can be submitted with the 95%. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 10 | Architectural | Janota/Ward | SOO Para 1.3.2 | SOO Section 1.3.2 states renovation of “plumbing systems” Clarify extent of plumbing systems to renovated. Clarify whether or not this includes Toilet Room Renovations. | Bathrooms and Toilet rooms are not to be addressed. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 11 | General | L. Mendoza | SOO Para 1.1.1 | The SOO states, "The modifications are only to include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." CDRL #250 Table 1.23 recommends a 2 ton overhead bridge crane. Please confirm if a bridge crane is already present or if a new bridge crane is required as part of the design scope. | Bridge crane is not present. Inclusion into scope TBD. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 12 | Structural | L. Mendoza | SOO 2.7.1.6 | The SOO states, "The modifications are only to include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." Attach B - LAFB Structural Investigation states, "Door repairs are necessary for the large sliding doors (Figure 12 & Figure 13) so that the manual opening and closing will not continue to pose a danger to personnel. The leaves of the doors that rub on one another should be repaired. If feasible, an automated door system should be considered for the safety and benefit of the site workers. " Please confirm that Hangar Door replacement is not included as part of the design scope. | The Hangar door is not included as part of the design scope. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 13 | General | L. Mendoza | SOO Para 1.1.1 | The SOO states, "The modifications are only to include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." CDRL #250 Table 1.23 requires the Aircraft Maintenance Bay floor to slope a minimum of 0.5% towards the flight line door or trench drains. Please confirm modifications to the existing floor are not part of the design scope. | Modifications of the existing floor are not included in the design scope. Scope of work is to identify slope towards floor drains. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 |
| 14 | Structural | L. Mendoza | SOO 2.7.1.6 | A structural analysis is included as a deliverable for the 35%. What is expected to be included in the Structural Analysis? |
| Based on review of Attach B - LAFB Structural Investigation, B50 shows signs of roof leaks, slab cracking, and CMU wall step cracking/moisture migration. None of these issues appear to require a structural analysis to be conducted. | The scope for project will include modifications to tow, park, and service the T-7A. Additionally, as noted in Attach B - LAFB Structural Investigation, repairs to the CMU will be necessary. Foundaition feather cracks will need to be addressed. The structure must be able to support all T-7A requirements. A complete re-performance of the structural analysis will be needed to determine if additional support is required. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |||||
| 15 | General | Stoppel | SOO Para 2.7.3.8 | What are the requirements for the Statement of Work deliverable mentioned in Para 2.7.3.8? | The statement of work is a description of scope of work and its components to adequately execute the IFCs. If you would like to submit a draft for review, you may do so in the 65% Design Submittal. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 16 | Low Voltage | Stephenson/Cornell | SOO Para. 1.3.2 | The SOO states "The modification of B210 is expteced to require the renovation design of... electrical". Confirm extents of telecommunication and security scope of work including, but not limited to, technoligical refresh or new installation of CAT cabling, work area outlets, headend equipment, public address equipment, CCTV equipment, CATV equipment, intercom equipment, access control equipment, instrusion detection equipment, etc. | Designer shall base scope of work on the T-7A mission bedown requirements as mentioned in th CDRLs provided. If these items are mentioned as requirements in the CDRL then these should be in the design deliverables. Confirmation of the RFI mentioned building systems existence/functionality in the facility is the responsiblity of the designer of record. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 17 | Submittals | Miller | Attachment I - Schedule of Submittals | SOO 6.1 requires A/E to submit all submittals outlined in Attachment I, Schedule of Material Stubmittals, for Government review. Within this attachment, it reference Lauglin Div 01 Specification Attachment X for EAL, AF 103, OPSEC Trng and Project Schedule, however this document is written for Construction Contractors, not AEs. Some alternations have been made to try to apply some of the sections to AEs, but inconsistently. Request clarification which requirements with in the document are supposed to apply to the AE versus which seciton are to be used in development of the design specifications. | Schedule of Material Submittals as provided is appropriate for the scope of work. A The AF 103 is included in the event utilies/systems are requested for interuption and Chugach must support or geotechnical investigations are needed. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 18 | Mechanical | C. Haby | SOO 1.1.1 | SOO states that "The modifications are to only include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." CDRL#250 Table 1.23 HVAC section indicates that climate requirements shall be met for "manned spaces" when hangar doors are closed. What is the current HVAC system serving the Hangar Bay? | Confirmation of the mechanical systems existence/functionality in the facility is the responsiblity of the designer of record. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 19 | Mechanical | C. Haby | SOO 1.1.1 | SOO states that "The modifications are to only include what is required to tow, park, and service the T-7A." CDRL#250 Table 1.23 Plumbing section indicates that Drainage systems are required for hangar door mullion pits and sliding hangar door tracks. Please confirm that modifications are not required for the existing hangar door drains. | Hangar doors are required to be 100% functional, drains provide 100% functionality so this shall be provided in this design contract. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 20 | Mechanical | C. Haby | SOO 2.6.1.7 | SOO states that "HVAC equipment shall be Trane." Is this limited to particular equipment types (i.e. AHU, Chiller, FCU etc.)? Is a Justification and Approval (J&A) provided for the sole-sourcing of the Trane equipment? | See attached J&A for Trane Chiller and its associated systems. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 21 | Mechanical | C. Haby | Mechanical General | Will mechanical systems be required to comply with all-electric requirement per EO-14057? Or will a waiver be granted? | Mechanical systems be required to comply with all-electric requirement per EO-14057 as required depending on extent of repair/renovation/replacement. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 22 | Hazardous Material Testing | Veale/ALPHA | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | Will the facilities be occupied during the environmental assessment? | Yes they will be. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 23 | Hazardous Material Testing | Veale/ALPHA | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | Will the ACM/LBP assessments include interior/exterior/roof? | Only the areas that are being renovated need to be assessed. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 24 | Hazardous Material Testing | Veale/ALPHA | SOO Para 2.6.1.2 | Please clarify the “plan for any abatement” identified in 2.6.1.2 of the SOOs. Are you looking for a SpecsIntact markup, or an Asbestos Removal Plan? We have provided the SpecsIntacton several occasions; however, an Asbestos Removal Plan is typically something the abatement contractor develops and submits for approvals based on their plans to perform work. It describes in detail where, how and what work will be performed. This would not normally be something prepared by the design team. | For this project, the A/E is sampling for Hazardous Containing material and providing the findings report with the 35% Design Package. | Response provided 9/18 | 17-Sep-24 | |
| 25 | ||||||||
| 26 | ||||||||
| 27 | ||||||||
| 28 | ||||||||
| 29 | ||||||||
| 30 |
03-03-2025 Ktr Que
| Item # | Date Requested | Contractor's Request for Information | Discipline | DLA/HDR's Response | Reply Date | Status |
| 1 | 3-Mar-25 | Do the Superintendent, SSHO and QC Manager need to be 3 separate individuals? | General | DLA Response: If the Government is being charged for three positions then yes we need them to be here. | Closed | |
| 2 | 3-Mar-25 | Are there any phasing requirements? Are there any temporary heating/cooling requirements? | Mechanical | DLA Response: No Phasing Must Maintain Heating and Air. |
| HDR Response: Existing HVAC unit serving the existing adjacent bank must remain operational throughout construction. | 11-Mar-25 | |||||
| 3 | 3-Mar-25 | Can the period of performance be extended after award once the material/equipment lead times are confirmed due to current market conditions for the equipment for this project? | General | DLA Response: With substantiating details, yes. | Closed | |
| 4 | 3-Mar-25 | Are soil boring reports available? If not, it will be assumed that excavation will be clear of rocks and obstructions. | Civil | DLA Response: No Soil Boring Reports available - address as+E5:E17sumption for bidding. |
| HDR Response: No soil boring reports available | 11-Mar-25 | |||||
| 5 | 3-Mar-25 | Please confirm the manufacturer of the existing roofing system and who carries the current warranty of the roofing system. | Civil | DLA Response: No Warranty | Closed | |
| 6 | 3-Mar-25 | Please provide the site visit attendee sign in sheet. | General | DLA Response: This has been posted to SAM.gov by the KO. | Closed | |
| 7 | 3-Mar-25 | Is there a bulk water fill i.e. a hydrant or water source we can pump from for grading operations in close proximity? | Civil / Fire | DLA Response: Yes, but must have a current Certified Backflow preventer with Tag. | Closed | |
| 8 | 3-Mar-25 | Please confirm whether asbestos or lead is present on this project, and if so, provide relevant the documentation. | Environmental | DLA Response: See Specs |
HDR Response: Building material has been identified to contain asbestos as documented in the Interior Baseline Asbestos Survey (September 2013). Work with ACM shall be performed in accordance with UFGS 02-82-00.
| A lead paint survey has not been completed; however, due to the age of the building, lead based paint (LBP) may be present. Prior to disturbing painted surfaces, the presence of LBP shall be determined, and material managed in accordance with UFGS 02-83-00. | 11-Mar-25 | ||||
| 9 | 3-Mar-25 | Please provide the contact information for the building controls contractor. | General | DLA Response: Controls are handled in house. What controls? |
| HDR Response: New split system controls consists of wall mounted programmable thermostat provided by the split system manufacturer per DUCTLESS MINI-SPLIT HEAT PUMP SCHEDULE on M-601. No need to tie into the base wide control system. | 11-Mar-25 | |||||
| 10 | 3-Mar-25 | Please provide the contact information for the building fire alarm company. | General / Fire | DLA Response: DSCR | Closed | |
| 11 | 3-Mar-25 | Please confirm the cybersecurity requirements for HVAC. | Cybersecurity | DLA Response: See Specs |
| HDR Response: The cybersecurity requirements for HVAC are outlined within UFGS 25 05 11 00, Cybersecurity for Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Facility-Related Control Systems. | 11-Mar-25 | ||||
| 12 | 3-Mar-25 | Please confirm the cybersecurity requirements for Fire Alarm. | Cybersecurity | DLA Response: See Specs |
| HDR Response: The cybersecurity requirements for the Fire Alarm are outlined within UFGS 25 05 11 01, Cybersecurity for Fire and life Safety (FLS) Facility-Related Control Systems. | 11-Mar-25 | ||||
| 13 | 3-Mar-25 | Please confirm if the contractor is responsible for the removal of communication equipment? | Low Voltage | DLA Response: Yes But we need the Credit Union needs to maintain comms. |
| HDR Response: Yes, contractor will remove all telecom infrastructure, wiring, and devices within the designated demo area ( the hatched area on TD101) as well as the exterior cable tray between B19 and adjacent building and contents of the tray will be disconnected and removed. The existing coax OSP/babckbone cable to the credit union, the contractor needs to verify the route and protect the cable for the continued operation of the credit union. | 11-Mar-25 | |||||
| 14 | 3-Mar-25 | Please confirm the quantity of communication equipment needed to be removed in hatched area. TD101, Sheet Keynote #1 | Low Voltage | HDR Response: Quantity not defined; the contractor needs to verify existing conditions and quantity before work begins. | 11-Mar-25 | |
| 15 | 3-Mar-25 | Please provide as-built information to confirm quantity of communication cabling required to be disconnected and removed. TD101. Sheet Keynote #1 | Low Voltage | HDR Response: As-built data is not available. Quantity not defined; the contractor needs to verify existing conditions and quantity before work begins. | 11-Mar-25 | |
| 16 | 3-Mar-25 | With regard to Drawing No. SD101B note 4 "EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB AND FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED ENTIRELY" please provide slab depth and dimensions of foundations to be removed. | Structural | HDR Response: Slab depth to be verified in field per General Sheet Note 2 and Detail A1/S-501. Dimensions of foundations are currently unknown. | 11-Mar-25 | |
| 17 | 3-Mar-25 | Please clarify the number of foundations to be removed. | Structural | HDR Response: Number of assumed isolated spread footings below concrete/steel columns is (14). Continuous spread footings assumed at load bearing CMU walls. | 11-Mar-25 | |
| 18 | 3-Mar-25 | Please provide detail for the existing in-slab truck lift to be removed. | Structural | HDR Response: See attached photo of as-built plan detail. | 11-Mar-25 | |
| ERROR:#VALUE! | ||||||
| 21 | 3-Mar-25 | What is the existing top of footing elevation? | Structural | HDR Response: At least 18" below grade to meet frost depth requirements. | 11-Mar-25 | |
| 22 | 3-Mar-25 | Please provide a section thru drawing detail of the roof cutoff area. Please provide spec for distance and finish of the new portion of roof/wall where we will be drying in the remaining portion of the building. | Structural | HDR Response: See Detail A1/S-501 and Sheet A-310. | 11-Mar-25 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .