Amd_0003.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT J 1 3

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

April 11, 2013

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

SP0600-13-0379

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

Kabul, Afghanistan

6. ISSUED BY CODE SCO600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

ATTN: Sean L. Turner DLA Energy - FESBB 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2945 Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-6222 Phone: (703) 767-9345 Fax: (703) 767-9338 Email: sean.turner@dla.mil

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., street,city,county,State,and ZIP Code) () 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

x

SP0600-13-R-0508

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

February 27, 2013

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

BIDDER CODE: CAGE CODE:

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[ X ] The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ ] is extended [X ] is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) by separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH

IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not, [ X ] is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SEE PAGES 2-3

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Items 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

ALICIA C. WILLIAMS

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C.DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C.DATE SIGNED

NSN: 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

SP0600-13-R-0508

COCO Storage Services, Kabul, Afghanistan

Amendment 0003, Page 2

A. This amendment is hereby issued to answer the following received questions:

1. Page 3, Section 1.5. The second paragraph mentions total turnover of 5,100 bbls of DF2. Since the stated required capacity for DF2 is 16,000 bbls, please confirm or clarify the estimated throughput requirement for

DF2.

DLA Energy’s Response: DLA Energy confirms the following:

• Through-Put: 5,100 bbls

• Annual Issues: 2,000 bbls

• Annual Receipts: 8,100 bbls

• Product: Diesel (RDF)

• Inventory Turns: 1

2. The RFP states that, “The facility will be capable of receiving tank truck simultaneously (6k to 10k gallon capacity).” Please clarify how many tank trucks the facility must be able to receive simultaneously.

DLA Energy’s Response: Facility should be capable of receiving (25) tank trucks in varying sizes for 6K to 10K Gallons capacity. Facility should be capable of simultaneously receiving four (4) tank trucks in varying sizes for 6K to 10K Gallons capacity. Four receiving points are required, with Meters and filtration capability.

3. The RFP states that, “The facility will be capable of shipping tank truck simultaneously (6k to 10k gallon capacity).” As above, please clarify how many tank trucks the facility must be able to load simultaneously.

DLA Energy’s Response: Facility should be capable of shipping (25) tank trucks in varying sizes for 6K to 10K Gallons capacity. Facility should be capable of simultaneously shipping four (4) tank trucks in varying sizes for 6K to 10K Gallons capacity. Four issuing Points are required, with meters and filtration capability.

4. Section 2.6 of the PWS. The last sentence in the paragraph is, “Do we want the storage tanks to be epoxy coated.” We assume that this is a residual comment from the internal review and editing process. However, please clarify whether in fact the tanks must be epoxy coated?

DLA Energy’s Response: Storage tanks are not required to be epoxy coated. If the contractor would like to put epoxy coating on the tank, approval from DLA Energy is required. Storage tanks should be designated for a single grade of fuel. If a product change is required in a tank(s), the tank shall be inspected, emptied and cleaned and re-inspected to ensure elimination of excessive rust or sludge. Conversions to certain fuels require special cleaning instructions. Contractor shall consult DLA Energy or the Service Control Points to receive instructions for proper cleaning and certification.

5. Section 2.8. of the PWS This section states that the contractor will be required to purchase the necessary additives for the fuel (FSII, CI/LI, and SDA). However, on page 10, the descriptions of the CLINs for the additives (1002 – 1004) state that the Government will normally purchase and provide the required additives.

Please confirm that for this solicitation the contractor will be responsible for purchasing the additives.

DLA Energy’s Response: See Amendment 0001.

6. Line Item 1001. Please clarify the volume of throughput that should be used as the basis for calculating the per barrel cost. This section refers to 105,000 bbls (presumably of F34), but this is inconsistent with the

SP0600-13-R-0508

COCO Storage Services, Kabul, Afghanistan

Amendment 0003, Page 3

1,700,000 bbls of throughput for F34 stated in Section 1.4 (p. 3). There is also no reference to the total throughput of DF2. Please provide clarification regarding the throughput for each fuel to be assumed for the cost calculations of CLIN 1001.

DLA Energy’s Response: DLA Energy confirms the following:

• Through-Put: 1,700,000 bbls

• Annual Issues: 1,630,000 bbls

• Annual Receipts: 1,800,000 bbls

• Inventory Turns: 16.19

• Product: F34 with all associated additives

7. Section B – Paragraph 2.2 Paragraph states, “This meter will be capable of recalibration, reset, and register in U.S. gallons (USG).” May meters register in dekaliters?

DLA Energy’s Response: The use of dekaliters is acceptable. If the contractor is to use the dekaliters, they need to ensure that the paperwork and the receiver are aware that the initial register reading is in dekaliters.

B. Section 3. Volume II, Technical Proposal (a) (Page iii of the RFP) is revised to read as follows:

a) The technical proposal shall demonstrate the offeror’s ability to meet the Government’s requirements as set forth in this solicitation. An offeror’s Technical Management proposal shall provide, at a minimum, the information requested in Clause 52.215-1(2), “INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION” (JAN 2004), DLA Energy Contract Provision L-0004-L116.01 – DATA REQUIREMENTS (STORAGE) (DLA ENERGY JAN 2013), L-0005-L201.02 – INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS (COCO) (DLA ENERGY JAN 2012) and 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commerical Items (JAN 1999). Failure to provide the information requested by any of the evaluation factors may be considered a “no response” and a rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” given to the applicable factor, sub-factor, element or sub element.

C. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

[ X ] The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ ] is extended [X ] is not extended.