SOLICITATION ATTACHMENT 04 - Past Performance Questionnaire for General Contractor.pdf
PDF 242 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PJ0024R0061
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a General Contractor related to a federal contract opportunity for the seismic retrofit and limited modernization of the historic Mike Mansfield Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Butte, Montana.
The key details are:
- The solicitation is for a design-build or integrated project delivery (IPD) project with a minimum contract value of $20 million.
- The project involves the renovation, repair, or alteration of the existing building, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and covers a minimum of 25,000 gross square feet.
- The Past Performance Questionnaire is to be completed by the offeror and then distributed to references, who will fill out Section 2 and submit the completed form directly to the Contracting Officer.
- The solicitation documents are available upon request, and all questions must be submitted in writing by June 20, 2024. Phase 1 qualification submissions are due by July 9, 2024.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION ATTACHMENT 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR
INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror is responsible for the completion of Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaires for each Similar Project. After completing Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaire for each Similar Project, the Offeror shall distribute the Past Performance Questionnaires to the References who will complete Section 2. Each Reference, after completion of Section 2, shall submit the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the GSA Contracting Officer in accordance with the instructions to Offerors for submission of proposals.
Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted directly to:
Christie VandenDries, Contracting Officer at christie.vandendries@gsa.gov
Email subject lines should reference “Solicitation No. 47PJ0024R0061, Mike Mansfield FB/CH Seismic Retrofit DB”
Similar Project (SP) means a project for renovation, repair, or alteration of an existing commercial or government office or courthouse building. The project must feature all of the following:
Substantial completion occurred within the last 12 years prior to the submission deadline for Phase 1 proposals;
The renovation or repair project covered a minimum of 25,000 gross square feet;
The building must have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places during the period of the renovation or repair;
The total cost at award of the contract for project was at least $20 million; and The project substantially used the design–build or integrated project delivery (IPD) methods. For the purposes of this evaluation factor, IPD is defined as the execution of a multiparty agreement in which the owner or developer contracted with a single offeror to provide all or substantially all, of the design and construction services for that project.
SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR
Name of Offeror/Firm:
Contract Number:
Was the Offeror the Prime Contractor:
Place of Performance (City and State):
Period of Performance (include start date and substantial completion date):
Was the delivery method DB or IPD:
Gross Square Footage of Commercial Building Construction:
Contract Value at initial award: $
Total Contract Value (including modifications): $
Briefly describe all construction work performed under this contract (address construction of site utilities, storm drainage, grading, roads, and security):
Continued on next page mailto:christie.vandendries@gsa.gov
Section 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE NOTE: If the offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last twelve (12) years, that meet the Similar Project definition, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Name of Respondent/Title:
Firm Name:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
Performance Information: Please check the level of the Offeror’s overall performance in each of the past performance categories listed below.
Check “N/A” if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated. If any portion of the contract performance was performed by subcontractors, please include the subcontractor’s performance on the same chart.
KEY: Poor – A Poor rating indicates the Offeror/Firm completely failed to meet the requirements.
Marginal – A Marginal rating indicates the Offeror/Firm failed to meet some of the contract requirements.
Average – An average rating indicates the Offeror/Firm met the contract requirements.
Very Good – A Very Good rating indicates the Offeror/Firm exceeded some of the contract requirements.
Excellent – An Excellent rating indicates the Offeror/Firm significantly exceeded the contract requirements.
PAST PERFORMANCE CATEGORY Poor Marginal Average Very Good
Excellent N/A
Quality of workmanship
Timely performance of contract requirements
Reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction
Effectiveness of on-site management (including subcontractors, materials, and labor force)
Identification/correction of deficient work in a timely manner
Overall Rating of the Contractor’s Performance
Continued on next page
1. Would you award to this contractor again? YES ________ NO __________
2. Could you provide another contact for further information? YES ________ NO __________
Remarks: (Please provide detailed facts concerning specific events/actions to justify your rating. Attach additional pages if necessary):
| Construction Work Description: |
| Offeror/Name of Firm: |
| Contract Number: |
| Prime: |
| Place of Performance: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Delivery Method: |
| Gross SqFt: |
| Contract Value at Award: |
| Total Contract Value: |
| Name of Respondent & Title: |
| Firm Name: |
| Address: |
| Phone: |
| Email: |
| Check Box16: Off |
| Check Box17: Off |
| Check Box18: Off |
| Check Box19: Off |
| Check Box20: Off |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box36: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box28: Off |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box26: Off |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box21: Off |
| Check Box15: Off |
| Check Box14: Off |
| Check Box13: Off |
| Check Box12: Off |
| Check Box11: Off |
| Check Box10: Off |
| Check Box9: Off |
| Check Box8: Off |
| Check Box7: Off |
| Check Box6: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box37: Off |
| Check Box38: Off |
| Check Box39: Off |
| Check Box40: Off |
| Rating Details: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .