SF1449_N4008425R0057.pdf
PDF 652 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract for Korean Translation and Interpretation Services
- Solicitation number
- N4008425R0057
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) for an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Korean translation and interpretation services in support of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Far East. The contractor shall provide personnel, facilities, equipment, and other items necessary to translate between Korean and English and provide interpretation services throughout the Republic of Korea and NAVFAC's Far East Area of Responsibility.
The contract includes a 12-month base period and four 12-month option periods. Offers are due by November 18, 2024 at 2:30 PM Korean Standard Time. The contract will be awarded to the responsive and responsible offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable quotation using Lowest Price Technically Acceptable source selection procedures. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement is 541930 with a size standard of $22.5 million.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SEE ADDENDUM
(No Collect Calls)
N4008425R0057 15-Oct-2024
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER
243-9767
8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME
02:30 PM 18 Nov 2024
5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)
Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
(TYPE OR PRINT)
(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)
ADDENDA X ARE
26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )
23.
CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS
SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER
17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT
BELOW IS CHECKED
TELEPHONE NO.
N400849. ISSUED BY
18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK
7. FOR SOLICITATION
INFORMATION CALL:
a. NAME
MOTOKO KAWASHIMA
2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER
(TYPE OR PRINT)
30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.X
25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
1. REQUISITION NUMBER
20.
ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.
OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
ACQR6079512
ARE NOT ATTACHED
27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED
(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE
SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:
. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION
28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN
% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED ORX
SMALL BUSINESS
17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY
OFFEROR CODE
NAVFAC FAR EAST
CORE EXECUTION TEAM
PSC 473 BOX 13
FPO AP 96349-0013
18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE
RATED ORDER UNDER
DPAS (15 CFR 700)
13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A
13b. RATING
CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE N40084 16. ADMINISTERED BY
12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-
TION UNLESS BLOCK IS
MARKED
SEE SCHEDULE
14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION
RFQ IFB RFPX
NAVFAC FAR EAST
INSPECTOR OF RECORD
CORE EXECUTION TEAM
PSC 473 BOX 13
FPO AP 96349-0013
TEL: FAX: (315) 243-2697 DSN
FAX:
TEL: SERVICE-DISABLED
VETERAN-OWNED
SMALL BUSINESS
8(A)
HUBZONE SMALL
BUSINESS
SIZE STANDARD:
$22,500,000
NAICS:
541930
X
OFFER DATED
29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.
DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY
COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND
EMAIL:
TEL:
31c. DATE SIGNED
SEE SCHEDULE
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
24.22.21.19.
WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)
ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM
EDWOSB
32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
(CONTINUED)
PAGE 2 OF79
ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________
32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN
RECEIVED INSPECTED
32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
37. CHECK NUMBER
FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE
36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED
CORRECT FOR
34. VOUCHER NUMBER
FINAL
33. SHIP NUMBER
PARTIAL
38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY
41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT
41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE
42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)
42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)
42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK
Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
SEE SCHEDULE
20.
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES
21.
QUANTITY UNIT
22. 23.
UNIT PRICE
24.
AMOUNT
19.
ITEM NO.
N4008425R0057
Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET
This is a solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotations are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.
The solicitation number is N4008425R0057 and is issued as a request for proposal (RFP) for the Korean Translation Service IDIQ for NAVFAC FE.
The below table describes Korean Translation Support services required throughout Korea and NAVFAC FAR EAST’s Area of Responsibility (AOR) for the Base Period. For Option Periods, please see Attachment 4 Price Schedule.
ITEM 0001 for the Base Year (For the Option Years, see Attachment 4 Price Schedule)
CLIN ELINS TRANSLATION -ENGLISH TO KOREAN (BASE YEAR)
0001 A724 Base Year -Translation -STANDARD Delivery Time -Translation Services
A725 Base Year -Translation -EXPEDITED Delivery Time - Translation Services A726 Base Year -Translation -3rd Party Reviewer STANDARD Delivery Time -Translation Services A727 Base Year -Translation -3rd Party Reviewer EXPEDITED Delivery Time -Translation Services A728 Base Year -Translation -HOURLY Rate for video translation A729 Base Year -Translation -Microsoft PowerPoint Slides
CLIN ELINS TRANSLATION -KOREAN TO ENGLISH (BASE YEAR)
0001 A730 Base Year -Translation -STANDARD Delivery Time -Translation Services
A731 Base Year -Translation -EXPEDITED Delivery Time - Translation Services A732 Base Year -Translation -3rd Party Reviewer STANDARD Delivery Time -Translation Services A733 Base Year -Translation -3rd Party Reviewer EXPEDITED Delivery Time -Translation Services A734 Base Year -Translation -HOURLY Rate for video translation A735 Base Year -Translation -Microsoft PowerPoint Slides
CLIN
INTERPRETATION -KOREAN/ENGLISH (BASE YEAR)
0001 A736 Base Year -Within 150 km of Commander Fleet Activities Chinhae, Republic of Korea
Interpretation -HOURLY Rate for attendance of meetings, conferences, teleconferences, escort interpreting, etc. from Korean to English and English to Korean
A737 Base Year -Within 150 km of Commander Fleet Activities Chinhae, Republic of Korea
Interpretation -DAILY Rate (based on 8 hour days) for attendance of meetings, conferences, teleconferences, escort interpreting, etc. from Korean to English and English to Korean
A738 Base Year –Virtual Interpretation (not in-person Interpretation)
Interpretation -HOURLY Rate for virtual attendance of meetings, conferences, teleconferences, etc. from Korean to English and English to Korean
A739 Base Year - Virtual Interpretation (not in-person Interpretation)
Interpretation -DAILY Rate (based on 8 hour days) for virtual attendance of meetings, conferences, teleconferences, etc. from Korean to English and English to Korean
The description of minimum mandatory requirements is provided in Attachment 1: Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). As indicated in Attachment 1, only new items meeting all of the minimum mandatory requirements may be offered. Reconditioned or used items will not be accepted. Note:
deviation from the minimum mandatory requirements provided in Attachment 1 is NOT allowed and an offeror’s quote that deviates from the minimum mandatory requirements will be determined non-responsive and not eligible for award.
Units must be free on board (FOB) destination (various locations in Korea and the AOR), which means that the seller must deliver the goods on its conveyance to the destination specified by the buyer, and the seller is responsible for the cost of shipping and risk of loss prior to actual delivery at the specified destination. Date(s) and place(s) of delivery and services are specified in Attachment 1: Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).
The following provisions and clauses apply to this acquisition, in addition to those contained in Attachment 2:
Clauses-Provisions. Refer to this Attachment 2 for more detail.
FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items, including addendum.
FAR 52-212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items FAR 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions – Commercial Items, including addendum FAR 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders -
Commercial Items
The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2024-07, effective 09-30-2024. It is the responsibility of the contractor to be familiar with the applicable clauses and provisions. The full text of the referenced clauses may be accessed electronically at:
FAR: https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far DFARS: https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html
It is important to note that this combined synopsis/solicitation requesting a quote shall not be construed as obligating the Government to award a contract or authorizing work to commence and shall not serve as a basis for any future claims against the Government.
The NAICS code for this procurement is 541930; Size standards in millions of dollars: $22.5M.
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX
QUANTITY
UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT
0001 1 Each
BASE PERIOD
FFP
KOREAN TRANSLATION SERVICE IDIQ FOR NAVFAC FE
The Contractor shall provide all personnel, facilities, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, transportation and other items as necessary to interpret and translate from Korean to English in support of this effort and from English to Korean in accordance with the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).
The price for this Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0001 includes the Base Period.
The total of Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELIN) for the Base Year are described as follows:
Base Period: 365 dys ADC ELIN A724 through A739
FOB: Destination
PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: ACQR6079512
PSC CD: R608
MAX
NET AMT
UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT
0002 1 Each
OPTION FIRST OPTION PERIOD
FFP
KOREAN TRANSLATION SERVICE IDIQ FOR NAVFAC FE
The Contractor shall provide all personnel, facilities, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, transportation and other items as necessary to interpret and translate from Korean to English in support of this effort and from English to Korean in accordance with the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).
The price for this Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0002 includes the First Option Period.
The total of Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELIN) for the First Option Year are described as follows:
First Option Period: 365 dys ADC ELIN B724 through B739
FOB: Destination
UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT
0003 1 Each
OPTION SECOND OPTION PERIOD
FFP
KOREAN TRANSLATION SERVICE IDIQ FOR NAVFAC FE
The Contractor shall provide all personnel, facilities, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, transportation and other items as necessary to interpret and translate from Korean to English in support of this effort and from English to Korean in accordance with the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).
The price for this Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0003 includes the Second Option Period.
The total of Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELIN) for the Second Option Year are described as follows:
Second Option Period: 365 dys ADC ELIN C724 through C739
FOB: Destination
UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT
0004 1 Each
OPTION THIRD OPTION PERIOD
FFP
KOREAN TRANSLATION SERVICE IDIQ FOR NAVFAC FE
The Contractor shall provide all personnel, facilities, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, transportation and other items as necessary to interpret and translate from Korean to English in support of this effort and from English to Korean in accordance with the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).
The price for this Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0004 includes the Third Option Period.
The total of Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELIN) for the Third Option Year are described as follows:
Third Option Period: 365 dys ADC ELIN D724 through D739
FOB: Destination
UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT
0005 1 Each
OPTION FOURTH OPTION PERIOD
FFP
KOREAN TRANSLATION SERVICE IDIQ FOR NAVFAC FE
The Contractor shall provide all personnel, facilities, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, transportation and other items as necessary to interpret and translate from Korean to English in support of this effort and from English to Korean in accordance with the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).
The price for this Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0005 includes the Fourth Option Period.
The total of Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELIN) for the Fourth Option Year are described as follows:
Fourth Option Period: 365 dys ADC ELIN E724 through E739
FOB: Destination
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS
Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:
CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY
0001 Destination Government Destination Government 0002 Destination Government Destination Government 0003 Destination Government Destination Government 0004 Destination Government Destination Government 0005 Destination Government Destination Government
DELIVERY INFORMATION
CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /
CAGE
0001 POP 01-FEB-2025 TO
31-JAN-2026
N/A NAVFAC FAR EAST
INSPECTOR OF RECORD
CORE EXECUTION TEAM
PSC 473 BOX 13
FPO AP 96349-0013
FOB: Destination
N40084
0002 POP 01-FEB-2026 TO
31-JAN-2027
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
0003 POP 01-FEB-2027 TO
31-JAN-2028
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
0004 POP 01-FEB-2028 TO
31-JAN-2029
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
0005 POP 01-FEB-2029 TO
31-JAN-2030
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal
Transactions
JUN 2020
52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting AUG 2020 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance AUG 2020 52.204-21 Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information
Systems
NOV 2021
52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Products and Commercial Services
SEP 2023
ADDENDUM 52.212-1
1. DESCRIPTION
This procurement is for Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Korean Translation Service for NAVFAC FE. The period of performance include 12-month base period and four 12-month option periods.
2. APPLICABILITY
This solicitation is a Request for Quotations (RFQ), therefore the words “offer” and “offeror” may be construed to mean “quotation” and “quoter”, where appropriate, and the words “proposal” or “proposing” may be construed to mean “quote” or “quoting”, where appropriate.
Quoters are requested to hold quoted prices firm for 120 days after the date specified for receipt of quotes.
3. PRE-QUOTATION INQUIRIES.
All questions concerning this RFQ shall be addressed to Motoko Kawashima at motoko.kawashima.ln@us.navy.mil and Wencee Narvarte at wencee.p.narvarte.civ@us.navy.mil. Responses to inquiries will be provided in the form of a Notice or an Amendment and posted to the website https://sam.gov/. The end date for any question submittal shall be Monday, 28 October 2024 by 14:30 Korean Standard Time (UTC + 9 hours), and questions submitted after that time may not be answered. Please submit any questions to the Government using Attachment 5, Question and Answer Form.
4. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM) REGISTRATION.
Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to the closing date for receipt of proposals. Contractors may obtain information on registration and annual confirmation requirements via the SAM website accessed via https://www.acquisition.gov or by calling 866-606-8220, or 334-206-7828 for international calls. Quotations from a contractor not registered in the SAM or from a contractor whose SAM registration online Representations and Certifications are not current will not be eligible for award.
5. FAR PROVISION 52.229-11 AND FAR CLAUSE 52.229-12
FAR provision 52.229-11 and FAR clause 52.229-12 are included in this RFQ. This provision and clause concern the imposition of a 2 percent Federal excise tax withholding on any resultant contract award or payment request.
This rule applies to Federal Government contracts for goods or services that are awarded to foreign persons. It implements the Department of the Treasury final regulations published in the Federal Register at 81 FR 55133 on August 18, 2016, under section 5000C of the Internal Revenue Code relating to the 2 percent tax on payments made by the U.S. Government to foreign entities pursuant to certain contracts.
Exemptions from this excise tax must be claimed by a quoter when it submits, with its quote, a U.S.
Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form W-14, Certificate of Foreign Contracting Party Receiving Federal Procurement Payments, available via the internet at www.irs.gov/w14. If not submitted with the quote, exemptions will not be applied to any resulting contract and the Government will withhold a full 2 percent on each payment. Failure to submit IRS Form W-14 with a payment request will also result in an automatic withholding of 2 percent from the payment request.
When filling out the IRS Form W-14 the following information may be used to complete Part I, Line 6 and 7:
Line 6 Contract / reference number: N4008425R0057 Line 7 Name and address of the acquiring agency:
Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Far East City or town, state or province. Include postal code where appropriate Country (do not abbreviate) Bldg. 1828, 1F, Tomari-cho Yokosuka, Kanagawa, 238-0001 Japan Any exemption claimed and self-certified is subject to audit by the IRS. Any disputes concerning this tax are adjudicated by the IRS because the Section 5000C tax is a tax matter not a contract issue.
Quoters are encouraged to seek guidance from their own tax, legal, or accounting professionals for advice concerning the provision, clause, and the execution/submission of IRS Form W-14. Additional information is also available at:
https://www.navfac.navy.mil/navfac_worldwide/pacific/fecs/far_east/about_us/contractors_information.html.
However, quoters are advised to consult Title 26 U.S.C. 5000C and its implementing regulations at 26 CFR 1.5000C-1 through 1.5000C-7 (see FAR 29.402-3, 31.205-41(b)(8)) for specific details and/or updates.
6. RFQ AMENDMENTS.
Any amendments made to this RFQ before the time set for receipt of quotations will be posted on SF30 to the Contract Opportunities at https://sam.gov/. Hard copies of the amendment will not be provided by any other means.
It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the website periodically for any amendments to this solicitation.
Contractors must acknowledge each amendment issued under this solicitation (if any) by completing the necessary section in Attachment 4, Price Schedule and submitting it with the contractor’s quotation package.
7. QUOTATION DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS
Quotations shall be posted electronically or delivered by Monday, 18 November 2024 by 14:30 Korean Standard Time (UTC + 9 hours) (Specified in Block 8 of the Standard Form (SF1449). Quotes and supporting documentation should be submitted so that they are received by the Contracting Officer before the time and date identified as the deadline for the receipt of quotes to ensure that they will be considered for award. All correspondence shall be in English. All documents should be submitted in Adobe PDF format (*.pdf) unless an alternate format is approved by NAVFAC prior to the due date.
The submittal methods of the proposal are electronic submission using Solicitation Module, mail, package delivery service (takuhai bin) or hand-carry. The Offeror shall select either electronic submission or other methods.
However, if the Offeror submits the quotation in both methods and there is any difference found between those copies, the PIEE version shall prevail. If the offeror elects to submit their proposal using electric submission means, the offeror shall use the Solicitation Module in the Department of Defense (DoD) Solicitation Module in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) (Please note that a PIEE account with Solicitation Module access is required to submit proposals through PIEE). Proposal submissions via email or electronic methods other than through the solicitation module will not to be accepted.
ELCTRONIC SUBMISSION
In order to submit a proposal through the Solicitation Module in PIEE, the offeror must have an active Proposal Manager role in PIEE at https://piee.eb.mil. All quotations (with all required supporting documentation) submitted electronically shall be posted submitted through the Solicitation Module in the PIEE website at https://piee.eb.mil/sol/xhtml/unauth/index.xhtml so that they are received by the due date and time specified in aforementioned Block 8 of the SF 1449 (unless revised by formal amendment). Email quotations will not be accepted.
Information and training on PIEE Solicitation Module is available at:
https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/solicitation-module Vendor Solicitation Module Instructions Additional Web-based Training is available at:
https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/index.xhtml https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf
Quotation Submission using Solicitation Module in PIEE To upload the quotation in Solicitation module in PIEE:
1. Ensure you have an active role as the Proposal Manager in PIEE.
2. Log into PIEE at https://piee.eb.mil/ to access the Solicitation Module or go directly to the Solicitation Module at the following link: https://piee.eb.mil/sol/xhtml/unauth/index.xhtml .
3. Select Solicitation icon.
4. At the Home screen of the Solicitation Module, select the Search link to find the solicitation you intend to post an offer against.
5. In the Solicitation Search Criteria filter by entering the complete solicitation number and for Status, select Open, then click Search.
6. When search results display, select the solicitation number link to open the solicitation.
7. The solicitation displays, with information as view only.
8. To post the offer, click the Offer tab.
9. Click the Add button to add an offer to the solicitation.
10. Select the applicable CAGE Code for which you are submitting the offer. The list is prefiltered based on the CAGEs in the Proposal Manager’s profile.
11. Click on the Choose Files link to upload attachments that comprise your offer.
12. Enter Signature Date and click Signature button after entering all necessary information.
13. Sign Document pop-up will be displayed requiring the user to enter a Digital Pin and OTP. Click the Sign and Submit button to continue.
14. After successfully adding the Offer a success message of the submission will be displayed providing confirmation of on-time/late proposal receipt.
Additional information is available at:
https://pacific.navfac.navy.mil/Facilities-Engineering-Commands/NAVFAC-Far-East/About-Us/Contractors- Information/
Offerors are responsible for submitting files in the format specified consistent with requirements stated elsewhere in this solicitation. Files that cannot be opened, or are otherwise missing the required content are the responsibility of Offerors.
It is an Offeror’s responsibility, when transmitting its quotation electronically, to ensure the quotation’s timely delivery by transmitting the quotation sufficiently in advance of the time set for receipt of quotations to allow for timely receipt by the Government no later than the date and time stated in the solicitation. Offerors shall allow adequate time to upload files, which may be slower for non-DoD users, and to avoid other technical difficulties that may be encountered. An Offeror risks the late receipt and rejection of a quotation where it delays transmitting its quotation until the last few minutes before the time set for receipt of quotations. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to confirm receipt of quotations. Quotations that are received after the due date and time in the solicitation shall be treated as late submissions and will not be considered except under facts and circumstances allowed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).
DELIVERY BY MAIL, PACKAGE DELIVERY SERVICE (TAKUHAI BIN) OR HAND-CARRY
Quotations shall be saved in CD and delivered or hand-carried to the following mail address by the aforementioned deadline. Quotations not saved in CD shall not be accepted.
Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC) Far East Attn: Motoko Kawashima, CON2 N4008425R0057
BLDG 1828, 1ST FLOOR, ROOM 101, BOX 13
TOMARI-CHO, YOKOSUKA-SHI, KANAGAWA-KEN 238-0001
JAPAN
8. LATE QUOTATIONS
Notwithstanding subparagraph (f) of FAR 52.212-1, the Government reserves the right to consider late quotations, modifications, and revisions if the Contracting Officer determines such considerations are in the best interest of the Government.
9. INCURRED EXPENSES
The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation
10. NO ALTERNATE OR MULTIPLE PROPOSALS
Neither multiple proposals, nor proposal variations or options, nor alternate or alternative proposal will be considered in the evaluation.\
11. NOTICE
UNITED STATES LAWS AND REGULATIONS PROHIBIT YOU FROM PARTICIPATING IN ANY OF THE
FOLLOWING CONCERNING THIS SOLICITATION/CONTRACT:
BID RIGGING
PRICE FIXING
COLLUSIVE BIDDING
BID ROTATION OFFERING
GRATUTIES OFFERING OR
RECEIVING KICK-BACKS
THE PRICES IN YOUR OFFER MUST BE ARRIVED AT INDEPENDENTLY WITHOUT ANY
CONSULTATION, COMMUNICATION, OR AGREEMENT WITH ANY OTHER OFFEROR OR
COMPETITOR. YOUR OFFER CANNOT BE DISCLOSED BY YOU DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY TO ANY
OTHER OFFEROR OR COMPETITOR BEFORE BID OPENING.
IT IS ALSO UNLAWFUL FOR YOU TO INDUCE ANY OTHER COMPANY TO, OR ALLOW ANOTHER
COMPANY TO INDCUE YOU TO SUBMIT OR NOT SUBMIT AN OFFER FOR THE PURPOSE OF
RESTRICTING COMPETITION.
ALL OF THE ABOVE ACTS ARE ACTS OF DISHONESTY UNDER UNITED STATES LAWS AND
REGULATIONS AND ARE FORBIDDEN.
PENAL TIES COULD INCLUDE DEBARMENT OR SUSPENSION FROM DOING BUSINESS WITH ANY
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CANCELLATION OF CONTRACTS AND RECOUPMENTOF
PRIOR MONIES PAID.
12. ATTACHMENTS:
Title Date Pages Attachment 1: Performance Work Statement (PWS) 15 October 2024 25 and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Attachment 2: Offeror Experience Data Sheet 15 October 2024 2 Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire 15 October 2024 8 Attachment 4: Price Schedule 15 October 2024 6 Attachment 5: Question and Answer Form 15 October 2024 1
Note: DFARS 252.204-7000 Disclosure of Information applies to all Documents, Exhibits, and Attachments as well as FAR 52.204-21 Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems and DFARS 252.204-7008 Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls, 252.204-7009 Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Third-Party Contractor Reported Cyber Incident Information, and 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting.
(End of Addendum)
52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Items NOV 2021
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
This is a solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6 (Streamlined evaluation of offers). This solicitation is issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP) in accordance with FAR 13.106. Written quotes are required (oral offers will not be accepted). Submission of quotes must be in accordance with FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors, Commercial Items. The Government will award a five year IDIQ utilizing the LPTA process because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price. Since award of the IDIQ will be based on initial responses, offerors are highly encouraged to quote their most advantageous pricing in their initial response. Award of the IDIQ will be made using the Simplified Acquisition Procedures in accordance with FAR 13.106-2(a)(3)(b)(1).
A. BASIS FOR AWARD
1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.
2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors.
The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.
3. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.
4. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award.
An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.
B. ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS
Each offeror’s technical factors and past performance will be evaluated separately. Upon the conclusion of the evaluation of the technical factors, and past performance, an overall non-price factors rating of Acceptable (A) or Unacceptable (U) will be assigned to each offeror’s non-price factors proposal.
1. The following adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign a rating to each technical factor. Use upper case letter ratings for major technical factor ratings. The addition of plus (+) or minus (-) to an adjective rating is not allowed.
Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method
Adjectival Rating Description
Acceptable (A) Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable (U)
Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
C. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Past Performance shall be evaluated when using the LPTA process, unless waived by the PCO in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b). Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in the following table:
Past Performance Evaluation Rating Method
Adjectival Rating Description
Acceptable (A) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
Unacceptable (U) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”
(a) Aspects of Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements. There are two aspects of the past performance evaluation.
(1) The first is to evaluate whether the offeror’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. The criteria to establish what is relevant is unique to each LPTA source selection. For this solicitation, a relevant project is defined in Technical Factors under Factor 1 Corporate Experience.
(2) The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.
(b) The Government will review past performance information to determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to the performance confidence assessment.
E. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors
Factor 1 – Quality Management
Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance
Quality Management will be evaluated by the checkboxes on the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) (Attachment 1) which the Offeror shall fill out. The distinction between experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts. Experience will be evaluated by the Offeror Experience Data Sheet (Attachment 2).
Past Performance will be evaluated by the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 3).
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
The price proposal and the non-cost/price proposal shall include page numbers and be clearly marked and organized to present a clear, concise offer.
Non-Cost/Price Proposal (Attachment 1, 2 and 3) Price Proposal (Attachment 4)
PRICE PROPOSAL
1. Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
The price proposal shall include the following:
a. Completed Price Schedule, Attachment 4. Proposals shall be priced only in Korean Won with No Decimal Numbers. Any proposals which contain prices with decimal numbers and/or the prices not in Korean Won such as U.S.dollars are ineligible for award. When the contract is awarded, the price of this CLIN will be expressed in U.S. Dollars for the administrative convenience of the U.S. Government.
Payment will be made in Won. Proposals not priced in Korean Won shall be deemed non-responsive, and will not be eligible for award.
Completed Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) worksheet in Microsoft Excel format as provided to support the amounts specified for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).
b. Copies of all amendments (if applicable) acknowledged.
Although not part of the price evaluation, Offerors should also include the following items if available with their price proposal to assist the Government in validating eligibility to receive an award:
c. An informational page that contains the following information:
(i) Solicitation Number and Title
(ii) Prime Contractor name, address, phone number, point of contact, and email address
1) Unique Entity ID (UEI)
• UEI will be assigned by SAM registration. All offerors (i.e., whether individually or as a joint venture, etc.) responding to this solicitation must be registered in the SAM database at https://sam.gov prior to the closing date for receipt of proposal in order to be eligible for award and must have completed annual Representations and Certifications in SAM. For SAM registration, please access the SAM database at https://sam.gov/content/entity-registration.
2) Cage code
• Once registered in the System for Award Management or SAM (see instructions in part d.), an
Offeror can request a CAGE Code through the Defense Logistics at https://cage.dla.mil/. There is no cost to obtain a Cage code. Offerors do not have to have a Cage code to submit a proposal, however, one will be required before receiving an award.
a. A copy of current SAM registration
Offeror must register with SAM at http://www.sam.gov. As mentioned in c.-1), offeror who do not have SAM registration before the due date will be ineligible for award.
b. Completed Representations and Certifications (found in Representation and Certification of this document)
c. A copy of a Joint Venture (JV) Agreement, Partnership Agreement and/or Teaming Agreement (if applicable). The JV or Partnership must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as the JV or Partnership before receiving an award.
d. Financial Capability, in accordance with FAR 9.104-1 responsibility determination, a contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract. Offeror’s are requested to provide a copy of the latest three years complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. For Joint Venture arrangements discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies and if the Joint Venture has been in existence for less than three years, also provide the latest three years complete fiscal year financial statements for each member of the Joint Venture. The Government may also request additional documentation (i.e. evidence of availability of working/operating capital) to meet the requirements of FAR 9.104-1.
e. Executed FAR Provision 52.229-11.
f. If applicable, completed IRS Form W-14, Certificate of Foreign Contracting Party Receiving Federal
Procurement Payments, if applicable. If not submitted with the offer made by a foreign person, exemptions will not be applied to any resulting contract and the Government will withhold a full 2 percent on each payment.
2. Basis of Evaluation:
The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:
i. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.
ii. Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.
iii. Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.
iv. Comparison of market survey results.
NON-PRICE FACTOR
1. Factor 1, Quality Management:
(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
Offerors shall complete and submit the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) (Attachment 1). Fill out all checkmarks for Attachment 1.
Offeror shall submit proof of being a legally registered company to conduct business in Korea by the RFP due date.
Offeror shall submit proof of having an office located in Korea by the RFP due date.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation:
The Government is seeking to determine if the Offeror has capabilities to manage quality of service in the following points:
1) Does the Offeror have capability to meet all requirements stated on Performance Work Statements (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) stated on Attachment 1?
The Offeror will be rated “Acceptable” if the Offeror is determined to meet all standards described above, whereas the Offeror will be rated “Unacceptable” if it fails to meet any of them.
A proposal receiving an “Unacceptable” evaluation rating for Factor 1 will be ineligible for award.
2. Factor 2. Experience:
Offerors shall submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of three (3) RELEVANT contracts or task orders using the Offeror Experience Data Sheet (Attachment 2). Offerors shall submit a minimum of one (1) RELEVANT contract or task order for each relevant project type (1 and 2) listed below in order to be considered for award. Each data sheet may only contain a single firm-fixed-price type contract. Indefinite- Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contracts will not be accepted (Example: A translation IDIQ contract would NOT be acceptable. Instead of the entire IDIQ, offerors would submit a relevant firm-fixed-price task order under the IDIQ).
A RELEVANT project is defined as a single, firm-fixed-price, contract or task order completed, or substantially completed, within five years of issuance of the subject procurement’s initial RFP issuance date. Substaintially completed means an ongoing contract or task order with at least 80% of work complete by the issuance of the subject procurement’s initial RFP date.
A RELEVANT project is further defined as:
1) Written translation from English to Korean and/or Korean to English for technical documents regarding Safety, Environmental, Engineering references, Engineering manuals, or Engineering guides
2) Oral interpretation services from English to Korean and/or Korean to English for speeches, trainings, presentation, or other interpretation services.
If more than the maximum number of the Offeror Experience Data Sheets (Attachment 2) are submitted, only the first three (3) will be evaluated.
If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. If a project was performed by a JV, and not all partners from that JV are on the JV proposed for this contract, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work was performed by the JV member offering on this contract and shall not include work performed by the JV as a whole.
If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent /LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1449), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate how the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will have involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g., personnel, management, equipment that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies shall commit to the performance of this contract). In particular, the proposal shall clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in the performance of the contract. Vague commitments to support are likely insufficient; rather, they must demonstrate intent/manner of actual performance on the contract action being solicited.
If and Offeror is utilized experience information of subcontractors, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team (e.g., partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.) whose projects are submitted to demonstrate Corporate Experience. The Government will not consider any project submitted for this Factor if it was performed by a firm other than the Offeror and there is no supporting partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment demonstrating the necessary level of meaningful involvement.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation:
The Government is seeking to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated recent and relevant experience as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. An Offeror will be rated “Acceptable” if the offeror submits a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of three (3) relevant contracts or task orders using the Experience Data Sheet (Attachment 2) and a minimum of one (1) RELEVANT contract or task order is provided for each Relevant project type (1 and 2) below. One (1) contract/task order may fulfill both 1 and 2; however, a minimum of two (2) relevant contracts or task orders is required:
1) Written translation from English to Korean or Korean to English for technical documents regarding Safety, Environmental, Engineering references, Engineering manuals, or Engineering guides,.
2) Oral interpretation services from English to Korean and/or Korean to English for speeches, trainings, presentation, or other interpretation services.
An Offeror will be rated “Unacceptable” if it fails to meet the requirements to be rated acceptable described above.
A proposal receiving an “Unacceptable” evaluation rating for Factor 2 will be ineligible for award.
3. Factor 3. Past Performance
Offerors shall clearly demonstrate a history of past performance on contracts/task orders that demonstrates experience in performing work similar to that described in the definition of a relevant project under Factor 2.
Experience. The offeror shall submit past performance information for each contract/task order included in its proposal for Factor 2 Experience. If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation as Attachment 3 is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2 Experience. An offeror should not submit a PPQ when a completed CPARS evaluation is available.
IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact on the PPQ. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 3), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Ms. Motoko Kawashima, via email at Motoko.Kawashima.ln@us.navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.
Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.
Explanations shall not exceed 4 single-sided (2 double-sided) pages in total.
Performance recognition/award(s) or additional similar information submitted will not be considered.
The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s reference or the references’ unwillingness to provide information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.
In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Contractor Assessment Performance Reporting Systems (CPARS) using all CAGE Code/UEI ID of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) or Responsibility / Qualification (RQ) in SAM, Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.
While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation:
The Government is seeking to determine if the Offeror has recent and relevant past performance information that pertain to the requirement outlined in the solicitation. “Recency” and “relevancy” of the performance information was already defined in the aforementioned (i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements of Factor 2.
Experience. The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the Offerors probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The evaluation will consider how well the Offeror performed relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.
The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Offeror’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Offeror’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation.
The Government will evaluate the degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., CPARS, FAPIIS or RQ, eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:
1) A pattern of successful completion of task;
2) A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;
3) A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .